Mathematics Project: Study Time vs Exam Performance
1. Problem Identification
1.1 Description of the Problem:
At Royalty Academy, student academic performance varies widely. It is assumed that increased study time
results in better exam performance, but this assumption hasn't been analyzed mathematically.
1.2 Statement of Intent:
This project uses statistics and linear regression to examine the relationship between hours studied and
exam scores.
1.3 Design:
- Collect student data (study hours vs exam marks)
- Use correlation and regression to model the relationship
- Interpret results using a regression line and correlation coefficient
2. Investigation of Related Ideas
2.1 Evidence:
- Correlation measures how two variables are related.
- Regression provides a predictive linear equation.
- Used commonly in educational studies.
2.2 Analysis:
| Idea | Merits | Demerits |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Scatter plots | Visual and effective | Can be misleading if non-linear |
| Correlation coefficient | Quantifies relationship | Doesn't imply causation |
| Grouped data comparison | Easy to interpret | Loss of individual detail |
Mathematics Project: Study Time vs Exam Performance
3. Generation of Ideas
3.1 Solutions:
1. Use raw student data with regression - accurate but time-consuming.
2. Use grouped data - easy but less detailed.
3. Use software - quick but less transparent.
Chosen: Use raw data with regression manually and through Excel for accuracy.
4. Development and Refinement
4.1 Chosen Method: Regression on raw data.
4.2 Justification:
- Gives real insights.
- Teaches regression and interpretation.
4.3 Development:
- Collect data from 10 students
- Calculate Pearson's r and regression line
- Plot graph and analyze
Example regression line: y = 3.7x + 40
Meaning: Each hour of study improves marks by ~3.7.
5. Presentation of Final Solution
Example Dataset:
| Hours | Score |
Mathematics Project: Study Time vs Exam Performance
|-------|-------|
|2 | 45 |
|4 | 55 |
|5 | 60 |
|6 | 63 |
|7 | 66 |
|8 | 70 |
|9 | 72 |
| 10 | 78 |
| 11 | 82 |
| 12 | 85 |
Regression line: y = 3.7x + 40
Correlation coefficient: r ~ 0.97 (strong positive correlation)
6. Evaluation and Recommendations
6.1 Relevance:
Strong correlation found - confirms relationship.
6.2 Challenges:
- Accurate data collection
- Small sample size
6.3 Recommendations:
- Increase study hours gradually
- Explore study quality in future research
- Use this model across subjects and terms