IN THE COURT SH.
YOGESH KHANNA: DJ: ROHINI
IN RE :
STATE VS. PAWAN
FIR NO. 704/14
U/S 307 IPC
25/27/54/59 ARMS ACT
P.S. BHARAT NAGAR
SENT TO J.C. 10/12/14
N.D.O.H. 25/03/15
APPLICATION FOR BAIL U/S 439 CR.P.C.ON
BEHALF OF ACCUSED PAWAN
RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the injured in the above noted case has already been
discharged from the hospital.
2. That the investigation in the above noted case has already been
completed as the charge sheet has been filed in the court.
3. That the applicant has been falsely implicated in the false case.
In fact he has nothing to do with the offence alleged against
him.
4. That nothing incriminating has been recovered from or at the
instance of the accused and recovery if any is planted upon
him.
5. That the applicant is not a previous convict or habitual offender
moreover he belongs to the respectable family having roots in
the society.
6. That there is no chance of absconding or tempering with the
prosecution evidence.
7. That the previous bail application on behalf of the accused has
already been dismissed.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble court
may kindly be admitted on bail, in the interest of justice.
DELHI APPLICANT
THROUGH
DATED COUNSEL