Scribd
Upload
89 views3 pages

Bail Application Neeraj Judi 439 377 4 Pocso

The document is a bail application for Ramesh, who has been accused under sections 377 and 342 of the IPC and section 4 of POCSO, and has been in judicial custody since May 3, 2017. The application argues that Ramesh has been falsely implicated, has no prior convictions, and poses no risk of absconding or tampering with evidence. The applicant requests bail in the interest of justice, emphasizing the hardships faced by Ramesh during his time in jail.

Uploaded by

kuldeep singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
89 views3 pages

Bail Application Neeraj Judi 439 377 4 Pocso

The document is a bail application for Ramesh, who has been accused under sections 377 and 342 of the IPC and section 4 of POCSO, and has been in judicial custody since May 3, 2017. The application argues that Ramesh has been falsely implicated, has no prior convictions, and poses no risk of absconding or tampering with evidence. The applicant requests bail in the interest of justice, emphasizing the hardships faced by Ramesh during his time in jail.

Uploaded by

kuldeep singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IN THE COURT OF DISTT.

& SESSIONS JUDGE


:ROHINI
Bail application no…. of 2017

IN RE :

STATE VS. RAMESH AGED 28 YRS.


S/O SH.SHANKAR SETHI
R/O H-2/73,JAHANGIRPURI,
DELHI -33
FIR NO. 198 /14

U/S 377/342 IPC &


4 POCSO

P.S. JAHANGIRPURI

SENT TO JAIL 03/05/2017

I APPLICATION FOR BAIL U/S 439 CR.P.C.

RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the accused has been falsely implicated in this case,

in fact he has nothing to do with the offence alleged against

him.

2. That nothing incriminating has been recovered from or at

the instance of the accused.

3. That the accused is not a previous convict or habitual

offender, moreover he belongs to a respectable family

having roots in the society.

4. That there is no chance of his absconding or tempering

with the prosecution evidence if released on bail moreover

he has suffered a lot in the jail as he has been in the

judicial custody.
5. That the accused is not required for the investigation

purpose as he has been in judicial custody.

6. That the accused is permanent resident of Delhi and

undertakes to furnish sound local surety up to the

satisfaction of this Hon’ble court.

7. That the accused undertakes to appear before the trial

court as and when required.

8. That no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the

accused in J.C. any more in the company of hardcore

criminals as the accused has already suffered a lot at jail.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that

the accused /applicant may kindly be admitted on bail, in

the interest of justice.

DELHI APPLICANT/ACCUSED

DATED THROUGH

VIJAY SACHDEVA & SURESH TOMAR


D-667-87 & D-3034-99
ADVOCATES
CH.NO.907, Rohini Courts, Delhi
Ph. No. 9312987083, 9311826508
IN THE COURT OF DISTT. & SESSIONS JUDGE :ROHINI

BAIL APPLICATION NO. … OF 2017

IN RE :

STATE VS. RAMESH AGED 28 YRS.


S/O SH.SHANKAR SETHI
R/O H-2/73,JAHANGIRPURI,
DELHI -33
FIR NO. 198 /14

U/S 377/342 IPC &


4 POCSO

P.S. JAHANGIRPURI

SENT TO JAIL 03/05/2017

INDEX

S.No. Particulars Court Pages


Fees

1. Application for bail -

2. Copy of FIR

3. Copy of order dated

6. Vakalatnama

DELHI APPLICANT/ACCUSED

DATED THROUGH

VIJAY SACHDEVA & SURESH TOMAR


D-667-87 & D-3034-99
ADVOCATES
CH.NO.907, Rohini Courts, Delhi
Ph. No. 9312987083, 9311826508

You might also like