Scribd
Upload
17 views2 pages

Chander

The Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9604/2025 filed by Chander Shekhar against the State of Haryana, referencing a related case where anticipatory bail was denied. The court granted the petitioner three weeks to surrender and apply for regular bail concerning FIR No. 15 of 2024. The decision was made by a bench comprising Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh.

Uploaded by

Mujaid ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views2 pages

Chander

The Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9604/2025 filed by Chander Shekhar against the State of Haryana, referencing a related case where anticipatory bail was denied. The court granted the petitioner three weeks to surrender and apply for regular bail concerning FIR No. 15 of 2024. The decision was made by a bench comprising Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh.

Uploaded by

Mujaid ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.

13 SECTION II-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO(S). 9604/2025

[ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 01-05-2025


IN CRM-M NO. 18126/2025 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH]

CHANDER SHEKHAR PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA RESPONDENT(S)

IA NO. 152944/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED


JUDGMENT

Date : 04-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
(PARTIAL COURT WORKING DAYS BENCH)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreeyash Uday Lalit, Adv.


Mr. Ishaan George, AOR

For Respondent(s) :

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R

We have been informed that arising from the same FIR

another matter came to this court on rejection of the

anticipatory bail prayer of the co-accused wherein this

court refused to entertain the Special Leave Petition

i.e., Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)

No(s).9398 of 2025.

Having regard to the above as also detailed reasons


Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
BORRA LM VALLI
Date: 2025.07.04
assigned by the High Court, we decline to entertain this
[Link] IST
Reason:

Special Leave Petition.

1
The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the petitioner may be granted a short time

to enable him to surrender and apply for regular bail.

In view of the aforesaid request, we deem it

appropriate to grant three weeks’ time to the petitioner

to surrender and apply for regular bail before the

appropriate court in connection with FIR NO.15 of 2024.

(B. LAKSHMI MANIKYA VALLI) (AVGV RAMU)


COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

You might also like