14 Ad - 213 Ad
14 Ad - 213 Ad
Era Summary
The period 14 AD to 213 AD was marked by relative stability across the great empires, yet it ended
with signs of major transitions. In the Mediterranean world, the early Roman Empire (Principate)
enjoyed the Pax Romana – a long phase of internal peace and prosperity under emperors from
Augustus to Marcus Aurelius 1 . Han China similarly experienced a high point of imperial stability and
expansion during the Eastern Han dynasty (25–220 AD). Global connectivity increased: trade routes by
land and sea linked Europe and Asia as never before, carrying goods, ideas, and travelers between
Rome, Parthia, India, and Han China 2 3 . By the end of the era, however, cracks were showing –
the Roman world faced plagues and political turmoil, and Han China was rocked by peasant rebellions,
foreshadowing imperial collapse. Overall, this era saw flourishing classical civilizations at their peak
sizes and cultural achievement, before an age of upheaval. (At the start of this era, the world economy was
dominated by Asia: the Indian subcontinent alone produced about 30% of global GDP 4 , and Han China
another large share, while the Roman Empire was the preeminent power of Europe and the Near East.)
Power Triad
• Dominant Power: Roman Empire – At its height under the “Five Good Emperors” (96–180 AD),
Rome enjoyed unmatched military and economic power around the Mediterranean 1 . It had
~60–75 million subjects and vast wealth (with an annual GDP around 60 billion sesterces) 5 6 .
Roman law, engineering, and culture spread across Europe, North Africa, and the Near East.
• Rising Power: Kushan Empire – A Central Asian dynasty (1st–3rd c. AD) that united parts of
northern India, Afghanistan, and the Silk Road corridors. The Kushans became pivotal
middlemen of Eurasian trade and patrons of Buddhism, helping transmit Buddhism from India
into Central Asia and China 7 . Under King Kanishka (c.127–150 AD), the Kushan realm
expanded and prospered, fostering relative peace along the Silk Road (“Pax Kushana”) 7 .
• Waning Power: Han Dynasty (China) – The Eastern Han Empire (reestablished 25 AD) initially
thrived – stabilizing China’s bureaucracy and opening Central Asian trade – but entered decline
by the late 2nd century. After 168 AD the Han court was paralyzed by eunuch factions and
peasant unrest. The Yellow Turban Rebellion of 184 AD and warlordism fatally weakened Han
rule 8 9 . The dynasty officially collapsed in 220 AD, ending centuries of unified imperial
China.
1
• Agriculture & Infrastructure: Intensive farming supported population growth (~250 million
world population by 1 AD 13 ). The Romans built vast irrigation and road networks – e.g. over
80,000 km of paved roads and aqueducts supplying cities 14 15 – boosting regional trade and
urbanization. The Han Chinese likewise expanded canals and granaries; Eastern Han engineers
invented the rotary winnowing fan and improved animal-drawn plows, raising farm productivity.
• Knowledge & Arts: Papermaking was invented in China by Cai Lun in 105 AD, using mulberry
bark and rags to create a cheap writing medium 16 17 . This facilitated record-keeping and
literature in East Asia. In the Roman sphere, literature and science flourished: Galen
systematized medical knowledge; Ptolemy’s Geography (c.150 AD) mapped the known world; and
concrete architecture reached new heights (the Pantheon in Rome, built 125 AD, featured a 43-
meter dome that remains the world’s largest unreinforced concrete dome).
• Textiles & Luxury Goods: Production of high-value goods expanded. Chinese silk weaving
became an imperial monopoly, exporting fine silk textiles west. Roman Egypt and India were
renowned for cotton and linen fabrics. Glassblowing, perfected in the Roman Levant, turned
out affordable glassware for the masses. These industries spurred urban craft employment and
interregional trade in luxury goods.
Negative Events:
- Antonine Plague (165–180 AD, Roman Empire) – A devastating smallpox outbreak brought back by
troops from campaigns in West Asia 21 . It killed an estimated 10% of the empire’s population – up to
7–8 million people 22 – with death tolls peaking at 2,000 per day in Rome 23 . Immediate causes were
viral contagion along trade and military routes. The disease ravaged the Roman army, forcing
Emperor Marcus Aurelius to halt offensives 23 . It also decimated villages and elite families, leaving
2
farms abandoned from Egypt to Gaul 23 . Downstream, this pandemic weakened Rome’s defenses
(foreshadowing greater pressures in the 3rd century) and, some scholars argue, spurred a spiritual
search – the empire saw rising conversions to new faiths (such as Christianity) as traditional pagan
rituals failed to halt the plague 24 25 .
- Yellow Turban Rebellion (184 AD, Eastern Han China) – A massive peasant uprising led by a Taoist
secret society amid festering economic misery and corruption 8 . Triggered by crop failures, heavy
taxes, and disenfranchisement by court eunuchs, tens of thousands of rebels wearing yellow
headscarves rose across north China 8 . Although the Han military crushed the main revolt by 185 AD,
it took 21 years of warfare to fully suppress remnant bands 26 . This rebellion fatally weakened the
Han state – the court had to delegate power to regional warlords, sowing fragmentation. The long-
term effect was the collapse of the 400-year-old Han dynasty by 220 AD 8 , ushering in an age of
disunity (Three Kingdoms period) and economic disruption in China’s North China Plain (once the
imperial heartland).
- Jewish-Roman Wars (66–136 AD, Eastern Mediterranean) – A series of fierce revolts by the Jews of
Judaea against Roman rule. The Great Jewish Revolt (66–73 AD) and especially the Bar Kokhba Revolt
(132–136 AD) were precipitated by religious repression (Hadrian’s ban on circumcision) and Roman
colonial policies. Roman legions brutally suppressed the Bar Kokhba uprising, flattening 50 fortified
towns and 985 villages in Judaea 23 27 . Over half a million Jews perished, and survivors were largely
expelled (the diaspora) 23 . The immediate impact was enormous loss of life and cultural trauma (e.g.
Judea’s fertile heartland was renamed Palestina by Rome). The long-term effect was the scattering of
the Jewish people across the Roman Empire and beyond, profoundly shaping Jewish history.
Meanwhile, the Roman Empire emerged victorious but at the cost of significant manpower and
resources spent in repeated repression of the province.
Geographic Impact
• Regions Prospering: The urbanized Mediterranean core of the Roman Empire saw the
greatest gains. Provinces like Italy, Asia Minor, and Egypt thrived from Pax Romana stability –
e.g. Egypt’s grain exports fed cities, and Asia Minor’s cities (Ephesus, Smyrna) grew rich on trade.
In East Asia, the Yangtze River valley in Han China benefited from internal peace and
agricultural expansion (becoming China’s rice basket). The Kushan domains in Greater India
(Gandhara, Punjab) prospered as crossroads of Eurasian commerce and culture, experiencing a
renaissance in art (the Greco-Buddhist Gandhara art blending Greek and Indian styles) and
serving as hubs for caravan trade 7 . Also notable is Funan in Southeast Asia – emerging in the
2nd century as a trading state in the Mekong Delta that eagerly absorbed Indian commerce and
ideas (writing, Hindu-Buddhist religion), Funan’s ports grew wealthy from burgeoning East–West
maritime trade.
• Regions Hardest Hit: North China Plain – the heart of Han China – was ravaged by the
late-2nd-century turmoil. War and rebellion depopulated once-thriving areas: for example, the
Yellow Turban revolt and subsequent warlord battles caused farming to collapse in huge swaths
of Hebei and Henan, leading to famine. Mesopotamia and the Levant endured repeated
conflict as well – the eastern Roman-Parthian frontier saw destructive wars (e.g. Emperor Trajan’s
campaign 115–117 AD, which ravaged Parthian Armenia and Mesopotamian cities). In the
Roman Empire, provincial frontiers suffered occasional incursions: the Marcomannic invasions
(167–175 AD) devastated the Danube borderlands (Pannonia, Dacia), where Germanic raids
destroyed towns and displaced tens of thousands of Roman villagers. Additionally, Judea
(Palestine) was catastrophically affected by the Jewish wars – Jerusalem was razed in 70 AD and
again after 135 AD Jews were barred from the city, and the province’s population and economic
capacity took centuries to recover. Finally, regions connected to major pandemics suffered: for
instance, central Italy and provincial cities like Lyons in Gaul were epicenters of the Antonine
3
Plague, which left mass graves and significantly reduced populations, dampening economic
activity in those locales 23 .
213 AD – 392 AD
Era Summary
The era 213 to 392 AD was a time of upheaval and transformation, as the classical giants struggled
and new powers took shape. Early in this period, the Roman Empire was shaken by the Crisis of the
Third Century (235–284) – a near-collapse under pressures of civil war, foreign invasions, plague, and
economic breakdown 1 . Rome survived by dramatic reforms: Emperor Diocletian (r. 284–305)
reorganized the empire and Constantine (r. 306–337) later founded a new eastern capital at Byzantium
(Constantinople) and embraced Christianity (Edict of Milan, 313). By 392 AD, Rome was officially
Christian and administratively split into Eastern and Western Empires. Meanwhile, Persia was
resurgent under the Sasanian Empire (founded 224 AD), which replaced the Parthians and dueled
Rome for dominance in West Asia. In South Asia, the Gupta Empire (c.320–550) arose, ushering in a
“Golden Age” of Indian culture and science. China, after nearly 400 years of disunity following Han’s fall,
saw the Western Jin dynasty temporarily reunify the country in 280 AD, only to fragment again –
leading to the Age of Division (Jin court in the south, rival states in the north). Crucially, this era
witnessed the Great Migration of nomadic peoples: Hunnic and Germanic tribes were pushed
westward by Central Asian upheavals, eventually breaching Roman frontiers (e.g. Goths crossing the
Danube in 376). Globally, the mid-4th century was a turning point: the old order (Rome, Han) gave
way to medieval successors. Despite warfare and demographic losses, there were pockets of flourishing
– Gupta India and Constantinople’s realm enjoyed stability – but overall it was a transitional era from
classical antiquity toward late antiquity, with power centers shifting and major religions (Christianity,
Buddhism) taking firmer root across continents.
Power Triad
• Dominant Power: Roman Empire (East & West) – Despite severe crises, the Roman Empire
remained the largest polity in Eurasia by territory and influence for much of this period. Under
Diocletian and Constantine, it recovered from the 3rd-century chaos. By the late 4th century, a
dual-imperial system had emerged: the wealthier Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) and the
embattled Western Roman Empire. Combined, they still boasted perhaps 50–60 million people
and formidable armies. Roman diplomacy and culture radiated widely – e.g. influencing
Germanic federates and Christianizing much of Europe and the Near East. However, by 392 AD
the West was weakening and reliant on foederati troops, while the East (capital at
Constantinople) was increasingly the empire’s dominant half.
• Rising Power: Gupta Empire (India) – Founded by Chandragupta I around 320 AD, the Gupta
state rapidly expanded over northern India (Magadha, Ganges basin). By the mid-4th century
under Samudragupta and Chandragupta II, it became a paramount power in South Asia,
known for prosperity and patronage of learning (sometimes called India’s “Golden Age”). The
Guptas’ rise filled the power void left after centuries of smaller kingdoms, unifying much of the
subcontinent. They pioneered advances in mathematics (e.g. early use of zero), astronomy, and
literature. Economically, the Gupta realm benefited from thriving agriculture and trade (Indian
cotton, spices, and steel were exported via Silk Road and sea). Their growing influence extended
culturally into Southeast Asia. By 392 AD, the Gupta Empire was at its zenith – a rising force
relative to a waning Rome and Persia.
4
• Waning Power: Western Roman Empire – Although the Roman world as a whole stayed
dominant, its western half was in decline by the end of this era. After 350 AD, waves of
Germanic migrations (Visigoths, Vandals, etc.) and internal usurpations strained the Western
Empire. Key setbacks – like the crushing Gothic victory over Rome at Adrianople in 378 AD –
revealed the West’s fragility. Economic contraction hit the Western provinces as imperial
authority faltered (e.g. Britain, Gaul faced barbarian incursions and usurpers). In contrast, the
Eastern Empire proved more resilient and wealthy. Thus, the western Roman Empire (with its
capital moving from Rome to Milan to Trier and Ravenna) can be seen as the waning power: it
was still in existence in 392 AD under Emperor Theodosius I, but increasingly fragmented and on
the verge of permanent split after his death (395). Its decline would culminate a few decades
later (formally in 476), but the weakening trends – depopulation of cities, loss of territorial
control, financial crisis – were well underway.
5
• Agriculture & Manufacturing: In agriculture, heavy plow technology spread gradually in
Europe (the first use of a moldboard plow in the Roman north is attested by the late 4th century,
enabling deeper tillage of heavy soils especially in Gaul). Also, rice cultivation techniques
improved in Southern China under the Eastern Jin, including better irrigation pumps and multi-
cropping, leading to population growth in the Yangtze region. In manufacturing, silk and textile
production in East Asia and Persia grew with rising demand. The Sasanian Empire became
famous for its silk brocades and woven carpets, spurring trade with Central Asia. The Eastern
Roman (Byzantine) workshops in cities like Antioch similarly produced fine textiles and luxury
goods, maintaining the Eastern Empire’s economic strength even as the West declined.
fertile soil in the Valley of Mexico, fueled its growth. The city’s influence extended to the Maya lands –
Teotihuacán traders and perhaps armies ventured to Maya cities like Tikal (which shows Teotihuacán
cultural influence around 378 AD). Effects: Teotihuacán became a center of innovation in urban
planning and art – it featured a grid layout and monumental pyramids (Sun and Moon Pyramids) that
influenced later Mesoamerican architecture 29 . Its dominance of obsidian trade and prestige as a
religious center (“City of the Gods”) impacted the development of other Mesoamerican cultures. Even
after its mysterious decline (c. 550 AD), Teotihuacán’s legacy persisted in the region’s mythology and city
planning for centuries.
Negative Events:
- Crisis of the Third Century (235–284 AD, Roman Empire) – A period of prolonged chaos when the
6
Roman Empire nearly disintegrated 1 . It was triggered by a perfect storm: rapid turnover of emperors
(over 20 emperors in 50 years, often installed by the army), widespread civil wars, barbarian invasions
(Franks, Goths, Alamanni breaching frontiers), and repeated plagues. By the 260s, the empire split into
three rival regimes (the Gallic Empire in the West, the Palmyrene Empire in the East, and the central
Roman core) and suffered economic collapse (hyperinflation, coinage debasement). The crisis was
eventually resolved by Emperor Aurelian and then Diocletian’s rise in 284 AD 1 , but downstream
effects were profound: the old Roman economy and provincial system were altered permanently. To
survive, Diocletian had to institute sweeping reforms – fortifying the frontiers, enlarging the army (at
great cost), price-fixing edicts, and the Tetrarchy (rule by four). These changes transformed Rome from
a principate to a more autocratic Dominate phase. The crisis also paved the way for Christianity’s spread
– a population seeking solace amid calamity found hope in the new faith, setting the stage for
Constantine’s conversion. Historians view this crisis as the end of Rome’s classical antiquity,
transitioning into Late Antiquity 31 .
- Fall of the Western Roman Empire’s Frontiers (376–378 AD, Gothic War) – A specific disaster struck
the Western Empire when the Goths, fleeing the Huns, were allowed to cross the Danube in 376 as
refugees. Roman mishandling (corrupt officials causing a famine among the Goths) led the desperate
Goths to revolt. The war culminated in the Battle of Adrianople (378 AD) in the Eastern Balkans, where
the Gothic cavalry famously annihilated a Roman field army and killed Emperor Valens. This defeat
was precipitated by the empire’s failure to integrate or control the massive influx of migrants. Impact:
The battle shattered the invincibility of Roman legions – it “shook the empire to its core” as
contemporary Ammianus noted. The immediate region (Thrace) was devastated, and the Roman army’s
eastern command structure was decapitated. Downstream, Adrianople forced the Romans to negotiate
settlements with entire Gothic peoples inside imperial territory – a precedent that weakened imperial
authority. It exposed the Western Empire’s vulnerability and foreshadowed further loss of control;
indeed, within decades, Visigothic and other Germanic kingdoms would form on formerly Roman soil.
In sum, Adrianople marked the beginning of the end for Western Rome’s territorial integrity.
- Hunnic Invasions in Eurasia (mid-5th century AD) – The Hun nomads from Central Asia wreaked
havoc across both Asia and Europe in this era. In South Asia, the Alchon Huns (White Huns) invaded the
Gupta Empire’s northwest in the late 400s. They overran the Gupta defenses, sacked cities, and by
500 AD had conquered much of Punjab and Malwa. Contemporary sources attest that repeated Huna
invasions were the main cause of the Gupta Empire’s decline】 32 . The Guptas expended
enormous resources fighting the Huns, and though a coalition drove the Huns out by 528 AD 33
34 , the Gupta golden age had been fatally undermined (the empire fragmented soon after 540).
Meanwhile in Europe, the Huns under Attila ravaged Gaul and Italy (451–453 AD). Attila’s forces
pillaged Roman Gaul until a joint Roman-Visigoth army barely halted them at the Battle of the
Catalaunian Plains (451). In 452, Attila invaded Italy, devastating the rich plains of Northern Italy –
archaeological and literary evidence indicates that many cities in northern Italy were destroyed
and the region was depopulated for generations 35 . Refugees from these provinces famously fled to
coastal lagoons, laying the foundations of Venice 35 . Downstream effects: The Hunnic onslaughts greatly
weakened both the Roman and Gupta Empires, contributing directly to the Western Roman Empire’s
collapse in 476 and the disintegration of Gupta rule by mid-6th century. The Huns also set in motion
further migrations – in Europe, their westward push had earlier forced the Goths into Roman lands
(triggering the events leading to Rome’s fall), and after Attila’s death the power vacuum led to new
barbarian kingdoms. In essence, the Huns acted as a grim catalyst of the late antique “domino effect” of
imperial falls.
Geographic Impact
• Regions Positively Affected: Northern India and the Ganges Plain under the Guptas enjoyed
stability and prosperity unknown since Mauryan times. Centers like Pataliputra, Ujjain, and
Nalanda thrived in the 4th century as the empire provided peace and royal patronage for trade
7
and education. There was an expansion of irrigated agriculture in the fertile Gangetic plains,
supporting population growth and urbanization. The Eastern Mediterranean & Anatolia (core
of the Eastern Roman Empire) also fared relatively well by the late 4th century. After the 3rd-
century turmoil, the East rebounded strongly – cities like Antioch, Alexandria, and
Constantinople grew in wealth. Constantinople itself, protected by massive Theodosian Walls,
became the most populous and well-defended city in Europe by 392 AD, and a hub of commerce
moving between Europe and Asia. Additionally, Southeast Asia saw some benefit during this
period: increased trade with Gupta India and China led to the rise of small kingdoms like Funan
(in the Mekong Delta). Funan in the 3rd–5th centuries welcomed Hindu and Buddhist influence
and prospered as a trading intermediary, suggesting that even as great empires faltered
elsewhere, the maritime spice routes enriched parts of Southeast Asia.
• Regions Hardest Hit: Western and Central Europe endured heavy strain, especially in the
second half of this era. The provinces of Gaul, the Danubian frontier, and Italy were repeatedly
ravaged – first by internal strife during Rome’s 3rd-century crisis, then by barbarian invasions in
the 4th century. For instance, large swathes of the Balkans were depopulated by Gothic and
Hunnic wars; archaeological surveys show abandoned farming villages in what is now Serbia and
Bulgaria after the Gothic War of 376–382. Northern Italy – once a Roman heartland – was
devastated by Attila’s 452 invasion, as noted, with cities like Aquileia reportedly so thoroughly
destroyed “nothing remained” and survivors fled 35 . In Asia, north China suffered immensely
during the Wu Hu (Five Barbarians) invasions after the fall of Western Jin in 316 AD. The Northern
Chinese states (Sixteen Kingdoms period) saw constant warfare; the Yellow River basin, formerly
densely populated, experienced massacres and refugee flight (Chinese chronicles lament the
desolation of the Central Plain in 4th century). This pushed the center of Chinese prosperity
south to the Yangtze region (under Eastern Jin) while the north lagged for generations. Finally,
Persia and Mesopotamia – the Rome–Sasanian frontier – were frequently fought over: for
example, the Roman–Sasanian war of 337–363 ravaged Mesopotamian cities (Amida was
besieged, and Ctesiphon threatened). Although the Sasanian Empire emerged stronger, the
border regions (Armenia, Syria) were left war-torn. In sum, the old imperial borderlands and
migration routes (Danube, steppe, north China plain) were the most consistently hard-hit zones
in this volatile era.
392 AD – 590 AD
Era Summary
The period 392 to 590 AD spans the late 4th, 5th, and 6th centuries, a time of falling empires and
emergent new orders. Early in this era came the final collapse of the Western Roman Empire
(476 AD) – when the last emperor, a boy named Romulus Augustulus, was deposed by the barbarian
general Odoacer 36 . Western Europe fragmented into Germanic kingdoms (Visigoths in Hispania,
Franks in Gaul, Ostrogoths then Lombards in Italy, etc.), entering the early medieval period. The
Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, however, survived and even reconquered some western
territories under Emperor Justinian (527–565). Justinian’s reign saw a temporary “restoration” – the
reconquest of North Africa and Italy, the codification of Roman law (Corpus Juris Civilis), and the
construction of the Hagia Sophia. Yet Justinian’s successes were limited by the cataclysmic Plague of
Justinian (541–542), which killed a huge portion of the Eastern Empire’s population. In Persia, the
Sasanian Empire reached a zenith under Kings like Khosrow I (531–579), becoming a stable rival
superpower controlling Iran and Mesopotamia. In South Asia, the Gupta Empire disintegrated by
mid-6th century under pressure from Hun invasions and local revolts, ushering in regional kingdoms.
Arabia was still a collection of tribes and small kingdoms (e.g. Himyarites in Yemen) – within a few
8
decades after 590, it would give birth to Islam, but in this era it remained largely peripheral. China went
through extreme fluctuations: after long division, the Sui Dynasty finally reunified China in 589 AD (just
at era’s end), following the turmoil of the Northern and Southern dynasties. Meanwhile, Mesoamerica
saw the end of Teotihuacán’s dominance (~550 AD, likely sacked internally) and the rise of Classic Maya
city-states. This era is often dubbed the “Late Antiquity” or “Dark Ages” (for Europe) – characterized by
declining old urban centers in the West, migrations, and the transition from ancient to medieval
structures. Nevertheless, it also laid foundations: Latin Christian culture took root in the post-Roman
West, while Byzantium and Persia preserved urban civilization in the Near East. By 590 AD, the classical
world had been irrevocably transformed, and new powers (Islamic Caliphates, Tang China) were on
the horizon.
Power Triad
• Dominant Power: Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire – Through this era, the Eastern Roman
Empire based in Constantinople stood out as the most sophisticated and powerful single state. It
withstood barbarian assaults that wrecked the West and maintained Roman institutions, a
professional army, and a wealthy economy (especially in the 5th–6th centuries). Emperor
Justinian I’s ambitious reign (527–565) exemplified this dominance: the Eastern Empire fielded
armies to reclaim Italy and North Africa, made Constantinople a dazzling imperial capital, and
was the arbiter of luxury trade between Asia and Europe. Despite setbacks (plague, war
exhaustion), the Byzantine Empire in 590 still controlled Greece, the Balkans, Anatolia, the
Levant, Egypt, and parts of Italy – effectively the most developed portions of the former
Roman world. It had a population of perhaps 20–26 million and a flourishing high culture in
Greek language. No other polity of the time matched Byzantium’s combination of size,
urbanization, and administrative sophistication.
• Rising Power: Frankish Kingdom (Merovingian Gaul) – In the power vacuum of post-Roman
Western Europe, the Franks emerged as a formidable new force. Clovis I, king of the Salian
Franks, converted to Nicene Christianity around 496 AD and united most of Roman Gaul under
his rule (founding the Merovingian dynasty). By 590 AD, the Frankish Kingdom (covering much of
modern France and western Germany) had become the most stable and expansive Germanic
successor state. It benefited from fertile Gallic lands and the assimilation of Roman
administrative remnants (Clovis cleverly retained Roman elites as administrators). The Franks’
rise was also buoyed by religious legitimacy – being the only major Catholic (as opposed to
Arian) barbarian kingdom, they gained the support of the Gallo-Roman Church. Thus, while
other Germanic kingdoms were falling (the Ostrogoths in Italy were conquered by Byzantium;
the Visigoths in Spain faced internal strife), the Frankish realm was on an upward trajectory to
dominate early medieval Europe.
• Waning Power: Sasanian Persian Empire – Though still strong in 590, the Sasanian Empire had
reached a high-water mark and was heading toward crisis. For most of this era, the Sasanian
Persians rivaled Byzantium: Kings like Kavadh I and Khosrow I expanded infrastructure (bridges,
irrigation), reformed the tax system, and patronized learning (the Academy of Gondeshapur
flourished, integrating Greek and Indian knowledge). However, decades of constant warfare with
the Eastern Romans (the Byzantine–Sasanian wars, especially the brutal war of 602–628 shortly
after this era) overstrained Persia. By the late 6th century, signs of overextension appeared:
heavy taxation to fund wars, religious strife (between Zoroastrian orthodoxy and sects like
Mazdakism), and succession disputes. In 590 AD, a civil war erupted when the general Bahram
Chobin usurped the throne from Khosrow II (who fled to Byzantine aid) – indicating the political
volatility setting in 31 . Though the Sasanian Empire would rally once more (early 7th century)
before its sudden fall to Arab conquerors (in the 630s), 590 marks the beginning of its end. After
centuries as a superpower, Persia was entering a period of internal weakness and vulnerability to
the coming Islamic caliphate.
9
Key Industries & Innovations
• Silk & Luxury Trade: The 5th–6th centuries saw luxury trade networks persist (even as other
commerce shrank in the West). The Eastern Roman and Persian courts eagerly traded silk,
spices, gems, and fine textiles. A major innovation was the development of local silk
production in the Byzantine Empire: according to legend, around 552 AD, monks smuggled
silkworm eggs from China to Constantinople hidden in bamboo canes 1 . This allowed the
Byzantines to start producing their own silk, breaking the Chinese monopoly. By late 6th century,
imperial workshops in Constantinople, Antioch, and Thebes were weaving high-quality silks,
reducing reliance on the Silk Road. The Persian Sasanian Empire also became famed for its silk
weaving and polychrome silk designs (many Sasanian silks have been found in tombs from
China to France). These industries not only enriched the empires but spread technology:
techniques of sericulture and weaving passed from East to West.
• Agricultural Transfers & Adaptation: In this era of migrations, crops and farming techniques
spread to new regions. For example, drought-resistant crops like sorghum and new strains of
millet may have been introduced into Africa (Nile region) via trade from India. In Europe, the
collapse of Roman latifundia led to more localized subsistence farming, but the introduction of
the heavy moldboard plow in the wetter north improved yields in heavy soils (this innovation,
which began in earlier centuries, was more widely adopted by Slavic and Germanic farmers in
the 6th–7th c.). The Terracing and irrigation techniques in Yemen (Marib Dam repairs) and
Persia (qanat underground canals) were maintained or improved in this period, securing food
production in arid zones. Also notable: the spread of the camel as a pack animal in North Africa
following the 5th century – camels enabled the growth of Trans-Saharan trade (though major
camel caravans became significant slightly after 590, the groundwork was being laid as Berber
societies adopted camel pastoralism).
• Religious Architecture & Art: With new dominant religions, construction and art took
innovative directions. The Byzantine Empire pioneered the domed basilica style, culminating in
the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople (built 532–537) – its massive dome (32 m diameter) perched
on pendentives was an architectural breakthrough that influenced church and mosque designs
for centuries 31 . In Western Europe, the building of monasteries in remote areas (e.g. Monte
Cassino founded by Benedict in 529) introduced self-sufficient complexes that preserved literacy;
these early medieval monastic estates became centers of innovation in agriculture and
viticulture. In South Asia, the post-Gupta period saw the Ajanta Caves (late 5th c.) and Ellora
(mid-6th c.) elaborately sculpted – rock-cut architecture flourished as a technical and artistic feat,
synthesizing engineering and art in new ways. The Maya cities in the Americas were also
innovating: by the 6th century, Maya architects in places like Tikal and Palenque had developed
the corbel arch and complex calendar inscriptions on stelae, reflecting advances in astronomy
and mathematics packaged into their ceremonial architecture.
• Military & Naval Tech: The frequent wars led to gradual military improvements. The Byzantines
developed a combined-arms approach codified in Strategikon of Maurice (written ~600,
reflecting late 6th-century practice) – including new cavalry tactics with armored lancers
supported by horse-archers (inherited from Huns and Avars). The era also saw early use of the
camel cavalry (particularly by Arab and Berber forces, giving mobility in desert warfare). In
naval matters, the Eastern Romans improved on the Mediterranean dromon warship, adding
lateen sails for maneuverability and possibly fore-mounted flame projectors (precursors to
“Greek Fire” which appears in 7th century). These would prove crucial in later naval battles.
Additionally, the invention of the horseshoe (possibly in late antiquity, around 5th c. in Europe)
and the stirrup (arriving in Europe by late 6th–7th c.) gradually enhanced cavalry effectiveness –
though stirrups became widespread only after 590, their introduction via Avars was an
innovation underway by this era’s end.
10
Major Events & Their Causes/Effects
Positive Events:
- Fall of Western Rome & Germanic Kingdoms’ Formation (c. 400–500 AD, Western Europe) –
Paradoxically, the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 can be seen to have positive long-term
outcomes amid the immediate chaos. The event itself – Odoacer’s takeover of Italy 36 – was
precipitated by Western Rome’s weakness and the rise of Germanic generals. In the short term, urban
decline and insecurity followed the empire’s collapse. However, downstream effects included the
decentralization of power which allowed new hybrid Romano-Germanic cultures to form. The
establishment of kingdoms such as the Visigothic Kingdom in Spain (c.419), the Vandal Kingdom in
North Africa (439), and the Frankish Kingdom in Gaul (481) provided regional stability after initial
violence. Many of these new rulers converted to Roman Christianity (Clovis’s conversion in 496 being a
prime example) and became protectors of the Latin Church. This fusion of Roman administration,
Christian religion, and Germanic custom eventually sowed the seeds of medieval European
civilization. In essence, while the empire’s fall was a “negative” in the short run, it positively liberated
Western Europe to reorganize politically; small-scale local rule and the Church’s guidance helped
preserve knowledge and order in a new form, ensuring continuity of Roman legacies (law, language,
faith) within the emerging medieval world.
- Reunification of China under the Sui Dynasty (589 AD, East Asia) – After nearly three centuries of
division following Han’s collapse, China was reunified when the Sui Kingdom from north China
conquered the south (Chen dynasty) in 589 AD. The Sui Dynasty’s reunification (completed just one
year before 590) was driven by the able leadership of Emperor Wen (Yang Jian), who had already
stabilized the north and instituted economic reforms. Immediate effects: China’s internal wars ceased,
allowing massive infrastructure projects – notably, Emperor Wen and his son initiated the building of
the Grand Canal to link the Yellow River and Yangtze River regions, boosting trade and integration. The
Sui also re-established a unified bureaucratic examination system to recruit officials on merit,
reviving Confucian administration empire-wide. Downstream: Although the Sui Dynasty itself was
short-lived (589–618), its reunification set the stage for the glorious Tang Dynasty that followed. A
united China in 590 meant the beginning of a new golden age – the Tang era would see explosive
growth in commerce, cosmopolitan culture, and technological innovation that would profoundly
influence Asia. Thus, the Sui reunification was a highly positive turning point that ended centuries of
fragmentation and laid foundations for medieval China’s prosperity.
- Justinian’s Reconquests and Legal Reforms (533–565 AD, Byzantine Empire) – Eastern Roman
Emperor Justinian I launched a remarkable series of initiatives. Starting in 533 AD, his general
Belisarius reconquered the Vandal Kingdom in North Africa; by 540, Ostrogothic Italy was largely
retaken (and by 552 the Gothic War ended). These campaigns briefly restored much former Roman
territory. Justinian also undertook sweeping legal reform – commissioning the Corpus Juris Civilis
(Body of Civil Law), completed in 534 AD 31 . This comprehensive codification of Roman law
immediately provided the Byzantine state with a clear, unified legal system. Effects: Justinian’s
reconquests, though costly and not all lasting (Italy was soon contested again), temporarily reconnected
East and West, facilitating renewed trade in the Mediterranean (grain from North Africa again supplied
Constantinople). His Corpus Juris had an even greater downstream impact: it preserved Roman legal
principles that later became the bedrock of European civil law traditions 31 . Many centuries later
(11th–12th c.), this code was rediscovered in the West and informed the development of modern legal
systems. In the short term, Justinian’s projects also left a legacy of monumental architecture – e.g. the
Hagia Sophia (constructed 532–537) as an engineering marvel – symbolizing Byzantine dominance and
inspiring sacred architecture thereafter. Despite causing imperial overstretch and heavy taxes,
Justinian’s efforts positively shaped the cultural and legal inheritance of both the Byzantine Empire
and, eventually, Western Europe.
11
Negative Events:
- Fall of the Western Roman Empire (Dispatch of 476 AD, Europe) – The official end of the Western
Empire in 476 was a major civilizational shock. The ouster of the last emperor was itself largely symbolic
(real power had been in barbarian generals’ hands already), but it signified the end of centralized
Roman authority in the West. The immediate causes included decades of internal decay, loss of
territories, and reliance on barbarian mercenaries who no longer saw a need for a puppet emperor.
Immediate impacts: The Roman state’s collapse led to a steep decline in urban life and long-distance
economy in Western Europe. For instance, Rome’s population plummeted from hundreds of thousands
to perhaps 30,000 by 500 AD as aqueducts fell into disrepair and security waned. Literacy rates and
monumental building in the West dropped as resources shifted to subsistence needs and local
warlords. Downstream: The power vacuum led to incessant warfare between emerging Germanic
kingdoms (e.g. wars between Visigoths and Franks). The absence of Roman legions also left regions like
Britain open to invasions (Angles, Saxons). In summary, the fall of Rome caused political
fragmentation, economic regression (trade routes like the Rhine-Danube axis shriveled), and
demographic contraction in Western Europe – changes so profound that historians long dubbed the
period the “Dark Ages.” It would take centuries for Europe to climb back to the levels of organization
and output it had under Rome.
- Plague of Justinian (541–542 AD, Mediterranean World) – A catastrophic bubonic plague pandemic
struck the Eastern Roman Empire and beyond in the mid-6th century. Likely originating in Egypt (the
granary of Constantinople), the plague reached the capital in 542 AD. Contemporary accounts (e.g. by
Procopius) report that at its height Constantinople saw up to 5,000 deaths per day, eventually killing
perhaps 40% of the city’s inhabitants. Modern estimates suggest the plague killed 25 to 50 million
people empire-wide – roughly 1/3 of the Eastern Mediterranean population 37 38 . This first plague
pandemic, caused by Yersinia pestis, recurred in waves for two centuries. Effects: The immediate impact
was devastating demographic collapse – villages and farms were abandoned, causing labor scarcity.
The empire’s military was crippled (Justinian, unable to muster manpower, had to end his reconquests;
his planned campaigns against the Persians stalled). Economically, the plague ushered in recession:
with fewer taxpayers and consumers, state revenues plummeted and trade volumes fell. It arguably
weakened Byzantium so much that it lost gains in Italy and could not resist subsequent Lombard
invasions there (568 AD). The plague also hit Persia and port cities around the Mediterranean, similarly
undermining Sasanian strength. In the longer term, some historians suggest this pandemic shifted the
course of history – softening both Byzantines and Persians so that neither could withstand the
coming 7th-century onslaught of Islamic armies. Thus, the Plague of Justinian was a major negative
turning point, ending any hope of a fully revived Roman Mediterranean and exacerbating the divide
between a now much poorer West and an East struggling to recover.
- Climate Cooling & Famine (“Late Antique Little Ice Age”, 536–545 AD) – An often overlooked but
severe event cluster: in 536 AD a mysterious volcanic eruption (or comet impact) blanketed the
atmosphere with dust, dimming the sun for 18 months. Byzantine historian Procopius wrote that the
sun’s light was “like the moon” and summer temperatures dropped sharply. This marked the start of a
decade of climatic chaos – modern dendrochronology shows 536 was the coldest year in several
millennia, and additional eruptions in 540 and 547 prolonged the cooling 21 . Consequences: Crop
failures and famine spread across the Northern Hemisphere. Irish annals record “a failure of bread” in
536–539, and Chinese chronicles speak of snow in summer, with resulting famine and epidemic disease.
These famines likely weakened populations and made them more susceptible to the plague of 541. For
example, food shortages in the Eastern Mediterranean circa 536–540 undermined the nutrition and
immunity of urban dwellers just before the Plague of Justinian hit, amplifying mortality. In China, the
climate anomaly has been linked to hardships during the Northern Wei–Eastern Wei period (mass
migrations south for food). The global impact was widespread misery: the population decline from
famine (though not precisely quantified) was significant in Scandinavia and the British Isles (some
settlements were abandoned). In Mesoamerica, too, around the 6th century, Teotihuacán’s collapse
(~550) coincides intriguingly with this adverse climate period, which may have led to internal unrest or
12
resource scarcity. In sum, this “Late Antique Little Ice Age” and associated famines represent a profound
negative shock to human societies, contributing to political turmoil and the precipitous fall of multiple
civilizations (e.g. accelerating Teotihuacán’s fall and weakening Byzantium and Persia on the eve of
great changes).
Geographic Impact
• Regions Positively Affected: Byzantine Anatolia and the Levant remained relatively secure
and productive. Through turmoil elsewhere, Asia Minor (Turkey) actually saw population influx as
people from more exposed Balkans and Syria sought refuge in the well-defended Anatolian
interior. Cities like Thessaloniki in Greece and Tarsus in Cilicia continued as bustling centers,
protected by the Eastern Empire’s stronghold. Similarly, Southern China (Yangtze Valley)
thrived under the Southern Dynasties (e.g. Liang Dynasty) while the north was in chaos. Nanjing
(Jiankang), the Southern capital, was a wealthy metropolis of perhaps 1 million by early 500s,
benefiting from fertile rice agriculture and relative peace. When the Sui reunified China in 589,
this economically robust south greatly aided China’s recovery and future Tang prosperity.
Arabian Peninsula (Hejaz) – though not powerful yet – avoided the era’s plagues due to its
isolation and saw trade benefit from turmoil elsewhere: as wars raged between Byzantium and
Persia, the Red Sea trade via Mecca and Indian Ocean routes via Yemen became alternative
channels for spices and silk. Thus, Arabian merchant towns quietly gained wealth in the 6th
century, setting the stage for the rise of Mecca’s Quraysh clan (and eventually Islam) early in the
next era.
• Regions Hardest Hit: Italy and the Italian Peninsula were extremely hard-hit in this era. After
Odoacer’s rule, Italy became a battleground: the Gothic War (535–554) between Justinian’s
forces and the Ostrogoths devastated the land. Prolonged sieges of Rome, Naples, and Milan led
to famine and slaughter; by war’s end, Italy’s population was a fraction of what it had been.
The city of Rome, which had perhaps 500,000 people in 400 AD, fell to under 100,000 by 600 AD,
its aqueducts cut in war and many monuments in ruins 39 . The Balkans also suffered: repeated
raids by Huns, Goths, and later Slavs and Avars (after 550) turned much of the Balkans into a
depopulated frontier. Entire provinces like Pannonia and Dacia were essentially lost to
migrating Slavic tribes by the century’s end. The Persian–Byzantine borderlands (Northern
Mesopotamia, Armenia, Syria) saw continuous fighting. Cities like Antioch were captured and
sacked by Persians (in 540 AD Khosrow I looted Antioch, deporting its population to Persia).
These regions also bore the brunt of the Justinianic Plague – e.g. Alexandria and coastal Egypt
lost huge numbers, crippling Egypt’s grain output and starving both empires’ cities. In the far
west, Britain post-Rome was hammered by both famine and war: the withdrawal of Roman
legions left Britons defenceless against Anglo-Saxon invaders. Archaeological evidence shows a
sharp decline in living standards; urban life vanished and some highland areas reforested as
population fell. Lastly, in the Americas, Central Mexico and the Maya Lowlands faced setbacks:
Teotihuacán’s fall around 550 AD led to political fragmentation in Central Mexico (the Toltec state
would only arise later), and in the Maya world, many cities show evidence of disruption in the
late 6th century (possibly linked to climate swings and Teotihuacán’s collapse). Overall, the
former core areas of empire – Italy, the Balkans, northern China, and major trade cities –
were hardest hit, whereas power and population shifted to new loci (Constantinople, Chang’an
of the Sui/Tang, Mecca, etc.) that would define the next age.
13
590 AD – 809 AD
Era Summary
The period 590 to 809 AD saw the rise of new universal religions and empires that reshaped the Old
World, truly inaugurating the early medieval era. It opened with Islam’s emergence in Arabia: Prophet
Muhammad’s preaching (610–632) united the Arabian tribes, and within a century of his death the
Islamic Caliphate exploded across the map (the Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphates, 632–750). The
Arab-Muslim conquests rapidly overran the Sasanian Persian Empire (fall of Persia by 651) and took
large parts of the Byzantine Empire (Syria, Egypt, North Africa), reaching Spain and Central Asia. This
ushered in an Islamic Golden Age in the mid-8th century under the Abbasid Caliphate (founded 750,
capital in Baghdad) 7 . Meanwhile, Western Europe gradually stabilized: the Frankish Kingdom
(Merovingian, then Carolingian) became dominant, and by 800 AD Charlemagne was crowned Emperor
in the West (reviving the idea of a Western Empire). In the East, China’s Tang Dynasty (618–907) rose
after the short-lived Sui: by 709 AD, Tang China was at a high point – a united empire stretching into
Central Asia, with a cosmopolitan capital at Chang’an and influence radiating to Korea and Japan 19 .
The Tang and the Abbasids were the era’s economic and cultural superpowers, linked by revived Silk
Road trade. Across Central Asia and the steppes, the Turkic peoples became prominent: the Western
and Eastern Turkic Khaganates (6th–8th c.) and later the Uyghur Khaganate (mid-8th c.) controlled Inner
Asia and interacted with both Tang and Islamic realms. This era also saw the flowering of
Mesoamerican civilization: the Classic Maya city-states (Tikal, Palenque, etc.) reached their peak in the
7th–8th centuries with grand temple complexes and advanced astronomy, while in the Andes the
Tiwanaku and Wari states began to form. Globally, 600–800 AD was a time of integration and
innovation: the Islamic world created a vast zone of commerce and intellectual exchange from Spain to
India 4 ; Chinese influence spread via tribute and trade (e.g. Chinese papermaking technology reached
the Middle East after the Battle of Talas 751). Yet it was also an era of fierce conflicts: Arab vs. Byzantine
wars, Tang vs. Tibetan and Arab wars, and the rise of Viking raids by the late 8th century (793 sacking of
Lindisfarne marks the Viking Age dawn). By 809 AD (the year Charlemagne died), the map of Afro-
Eurasia had been dramatically transformed from 590: a Muslim Caliphate dominated the south-
central zones, a revivalist Christian empire emerged in the Frankish West, and Tang China stood
confident in the East, while the older Byzantine Empire survived in a reduced form.
Power Triad
• Dominant Power: Umayyad/Abbasid Caliphate – The Islamic Caliphate was the era’s largest
and arguably most influential empire. Under the Umayyad Dynasty (661–750), the Caliphate
expanded from Iberia and Morocco across North Africa, the Middle East, to Persia and parts of
Central Asia – a realm of over 11 million km², unprecedented in extent 7 . It united dozens of
previously separate regions under one administration, one faith (Islam), and a common lingua
franca (Arabic). After the Abbasid revolution in 750, the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258) took the
mantle, ruling from Baghdad. At its height (c. 800 AD, during Caliph Harun al-Rashid’s reign), the
Abbasid Caliphate was the world’s economic center: it controlled the vital east-west trade
routes, and its cities like Baghdad, Basra, Damascus, and Cairo were thriving metropolises. The
Caliphate’s cultural impact was enormous – it preserved and synthesized knowledge (Greek,
Persian, Indian) and innovated in science, math, medicine, and literature. With perhaps
30 million subjects and a flourishing agrarian base (irrigation in the Fertile Crescent, Nile valley),
the Caliphate of this era was unrivaled in wealth and intellectual output 4 .
• Rising Power: Tang China – The Tang Dynasty (618–907) ascended in early 7th century and by
the 8th century was soaring. Tang China is often considered a golden age of Chinese civilization:
it expanded Chinese territory deep into Central Asia (victory over the Turks, dominance until the
14
setback at Talas in 751), and exerted suzerainty over Korea (Silla as a vassal) and Vietnam.
Economically, Tang China was booming – the population rebounded (est. 50–80 million by
800 AD) and great cities like Chang’an (Xi’an) and Luoyang each hosted perhaps 500,000
residents, filled with traders from across Asia. The rise of Tang was facilitated by internal reforms
(equal-field land system, law codes) and its openness to trade; Chinese silk and ceramics were
coveted exports, while imports like glassware, horses, and spices flowed in 19 . Though mid-era
Tang faced the An Lushan Rebellion (755–763) which shook the empire, by 809 the dynasty had
survived and adjusted (albeit with more regional warlords). Tang’s cultural brilliance – poetry (Li
Bai, Du Fu), painting, woodblock printing (invented ~8th century) – and its central position in East
Asian politics mark it as a core rising power of the age. It was not yet at Abbasid level in
geographic spread, but it was a rising East Asian hegemon, setting norms for its neighbors and
engaging confidently in Silk Road diplomacy and trade.
• Waning Power: Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire – Though Byzantium was dominant in the
previous era, by 590–809 it had sharply declined in relative power. The 7th century was
disastrous for the Eastern Empire: it lost Syria, Palestine, Egypt, and North Africa to the Arab
conquests by 710 AD, stripping away over half its territory and much of its richest lands.
Constantinople itself barely survived Arab sieges in 674–678 and again in 717–718. The Byzantine
Empire that emerged by 800 AD was a smaller, more defensive state, confined mostly to Asia
Minor (Anatolia) and parts of the Balkans and Italy. It had dramatically less population and
revenue compared to the Caliphate or Tang. Internally, Byzantium went through upheavals like
the Iconoclast controversy (8th c.) which caused social and religious turmoil. While it stabilized
somewhat in the later 8th century (the Isaurian and then Macedonian dynasties reformed the
army and administration), the Eastern Empire was no longer the unrivaled Mediterranean
superpower – it had become one regional power among others. Importantly, it also faced a new
competitor in Europe: Charlemagne’s Frankish Empire, which by 800 claimed the Western
imperial title, straining East-West relations. Thus, by 809, the Byzantine Empire was a waning
power: much reduced in extent and influence from the 6th century, overshadowed militarily by
the Caliphate (which had taken Byzantine lands) and challenged in influence by the Carolingian
and Islamic civilizations rising around it.
15
• Scientific and Cultural Innovations: The synergy of cultures under the Caliphate led to
pioneering advances. In the 8th century, the Abbasids actively translated Greek, Persian, and
Indian works into Arabic (Translation Movement) – works on medicine (Galen, Sushruta),
astronomy, and philosophy (Aristotle) were rendered in Arabic 4 . Using this knowledge,
scholars in Baghdad and other centers made original contributions: e.g. Al-Khwarizmi (c. 820)
developed algebra (his Al-jabr treatise) and introduced Hindu-Arabic numerals and the concept
of zero to the Islamic world, drawing on Gupta mathematics. Astronomy flourished: Baghdad’s
astronomers improved astrolabes and measured Earth’s circumference (Al-Ma’mun’s team c. 830,
slightly after our period, but building on earlier groundwork). In Tang China, the invention of
woodblock printing by the 700s revolutionized information – the world’s first printed
newspaper appeared in Beijing by 713, and the Diamond Sutra was printed in 868 (just after
809). Earlier, Tang engineers also built mechanical water clocks and south-pointing chariots (an
early compass vehicle), showcasing technical creativity. Culturally, literature and art reached
new heights: the Tang era’s poets (Li Bai, Du Fu) and Abbasid era’s literary works (e.g. the
compiling of One Thousand and One Nights folk tales, development of calligraphy and
arabesque art) left enduring legacies. These innovations in science and culture created a bridge
between ancient knowledge and future Renaissance learning.
• Agricultural and Culinary Transfers: With expanded trade and conquest came the diffusion of
crops and farming techniques, sometimes called the “Islamic Green Revolution.” The early
Caliphate transferred numerous crops across its vast realm: rice, cotton, sugarcane, bananas,
plantains, mangoes, citrus fruits (like oranges, lemons), and various vegetables were
introduced westward from South or Southeast Asia into the Middle East and Mediterranean 4 .
For instance, sugar cultivation spread in the 8th century – Arab agronomists in Syria and al-
Andalus (Spain) learned sugarcane farming and refining from India, establishing the
Mediterranean’s first sugar plantations. Cotton became a major cash crop in places like Egypt
and Iran, fueling textile industries (the word “muslin” for fine cotton cloth hints at Mosul in Iraq).
New irrigation techniques were adopted: the Persians’ qanat and the Romans’ aqueduct
knowledge were combined with Indian waterwheel (saqiya) technology, improving water-lifting
in arid zones. The result was an agricultural boom in parts of the Caliphate by the 9th century –
increased food variety, year-round planting cycles, and urban garden cultivation. In Tang China,
new fast-ripening rice strains from Champa (Vietnam) were introduced (slightly later in 9th c.),
but even in our period the southward expansion of rice paddies increased food output. These
agricultural exchanges improved nutrition and population growth across the Islamic world and
China, laying groundwork for economic prosperity.
• Military Developments: The era’s conflicts spurred notable military evolution. The heavy
cavalry of the Franks (armored knights) began to take shape by late 8th century, with Charles
Martel reputedly reorganizing Frankish cavalry (circa 730s) to better counter Muslim cavalry –
possibly adopting the stirrup more widely in Europe (the stirrup, likely transmitted via the Avars
to Europe in the 7th century, allowed more effective shock cavalry). The Muslim armies
innovated in siege warfare, quickly learning from Persian and Byzantine engineers; by the early
8th century they had perfected use of catapults and siege towers, allowing them to capture
fortified cities like Carthage (697) and Constantinople’s suburb Pergamus. At sea, the navies of
the Caliphate grew – the Arabs, building on Byzantine ship designs, constructed fleets that
conquered Cyprus (649) and defeated the Byzantines at the Battle of the Masts (655). The
concept of “fire ships” (using flaming oil or “Greek fire”) was adopted by the Byzantines in the
670s to repel Arab fleets, an innovation that kept Constantinople safe and was a guarded state
secret. In East Asia, the Tang military employed combined forces: Chinese armies used
crossbows in mass formations and improved iron stirrups for cavalry, and notably, the first use
of gunpowder occurred in the late Tang (by 8th–9th c., Chinese alchemists had formulated
gunpowder and it was used in crude bombs against nomads). By 809 AD these latter
developments were still nascent, but the stage was set for the next era’s military revolutions.
16
Major Events & Their Causes/Effects
Positive Events:
- Rise of Islam and the First Caliphates (610–750 AD, Arabia to Eurasia) – The birth of Islam in the
7th century was a transformative global event. Prophet Muhammad’s preaching (610–632) in Mecca
and Medina unified the Arabian tribes under a monotheistic faith emphasizing community (umma) and
social justice. After Muhammad’s death, the Rashidun Caliphs and then the Umayyad Caliphate
carried Islam forth in a series of astonishing conquests (634–711): within a century, they conquered the
Persian Empire and much of the Byzantine Empire’s territories, as well as North Africa and Spain.
Causes: The Arabian armies were energized by religious fervor and the promise of plunder, and they
found the Byzantine and Sasanian states militarily exhausted from decades of war with each other 31 .
Immediate effects: The political map was revolutionized – a single Islamic empire now stretched from
the Atlantic to the Indus. This meant the end of the Sasanian Empire and the severe weakening of
Byzantium. However, the conquests generally allowed local populations (many still agrarian Aramaic-,
Coptic-, or Persian-speakers) to continue their lives, now paying taxes to Muslim governors (often less
onerous than previous taxes) and with religious tolerance albeit under dhimmi status for non-Muslims.
Downstream: Islam’s rise inaugurated a new civilization that blended Greco-Roman, Persian, and
Indian knowledge under an Arabic-Islamic framework. It led to the Islamization and Arabization of the
Middle East and North Africa – over centuries, regions from Egypt to Iran gradually adopted the Arabic
language and Islamic religion, profoundly shifting cultural identities. The unification under the
Caliphate also created an immense free-trade zone, propelling the early medieval economic revival (the
Islamic Golden Age in science and trade blossomed by the 8th–9th centuries 4 ). Additionally, Islam’s
spread linked sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia more closely into global networks (e.g. the trans-
Saharan trade for gold and salt expanded as Muslim traders reached West Africa by 8th century). The
rise of Islam is thus a centerpiece positive event: it forged a vast, culturally rich empire that became a
driving force of medieval progress in science, philosophy, and art, and it fostered a cosmopolitan Afro-
Eurasian world where knowledge and commerce flowed more freely than in fragmented post-Roman
times.
- Tang Cultural Flourishing (c. 710–755 AD, China) – The Tang Dynasty’s golden age during the early
8th century was a high point of arts, culture, and cosmopolitan exchange in East Asia. With the empire
stable and prosperous under Emperor Xuanzong (r. 712–756), Chang’an became a vibrant world capital
– hosting traders and envoys from India, Persia, Arabia, Korea, and Japan. Causes: Tang’s strong
governance, the reopening of Silk Road caravans (thanks in part to Tang control deep into Central Asia
by 750), and patronage of the arts by the imperial court. Manifestations: Literature thrived – the Tang
era produced China’s greatest poets, like Li Bai and Du Fu, whose works (written in the 740s–750s) set
enduring standards in Chinese literature. Painting and pottery also flourished; Tang artisans pioneered
new glazes (e.g. sancai “three-color” ceramics) and lifelike figurines. The capital Chang’an had
bustling foreign quarters, where one could find Zoroastrian temples, Nestorian Christian churches
(following a 635 mission’s success), and Buddhist monasteries – making it one of the most
cosmopolitan cities in the world 19 . Effects: Tang China’s high culture had immense influence on its
neighbors – Japan in particular imported Tang fashions, architecture (Nara and Heian laid out like
Chang’an), and Buddhism via missions in this period. Korea’s Silla kingdom similarly mirrored Tang
models in its government and arts. The era saw the diffusion of technologies: papermaking and
printing techniques began to disseminate; even as far as Baghdad, Chinese paper was known after mid-
century. Internally, the flowering bolstered Chinese national identity and set a benchmark for
subsequent dynasties. Though interrupted by the An Lushan Rebellion mid-century, Tang cultural
achievements endured and were recorded – they provided a rich heritage that later Song and even
modern Chinese culture look back to as a pinnacle. In summary, the Tang golden age was a positive
zenith of human creativity and cross-cultural fertilization in the 8th century, leaving a legacy in
literature, art, and international connections.
- Charlemagne’s Imperial Coronation (800 AD, Western Europe) – On Christmas Day of 800 AD,
17
Frankish King Charlemagne was crowned “Emperor of the Romans” by Pope Leo III in Rome,
symbolically reviving the Western Roman Empire under a Christian Germanic ruler. Causes:
Charlemagne (r. 768–814) had expanded the Frankish realm into the Carolingian Empire covering
modern France, Germany, northern Italy, and beyond – the largest Western European state since
Rome’s fall. The pope, seeking a powerful protector, and Charlemagne, seeking imperial legitimacy,
found mutual benefit in this act 31 . Immediate effects: The coronation established the Holy Roman
Empire (though not called that yet) and gave Charlemagne elevated status to negotiate with the
Byzantine Empire as an equal. It also tightened the alliance between the Frankish monarchy and the
Latin Church, fostering what would become medieval Europe’s defining partnership (church and state).
Downstream: Charlemagne’s rule kickstarted the Carolingian Renaissance – a revival of learning and
the arts. He gathered scholars (like Alcuin of York) to his court; monasteries expanded scriptoria that
preserved and copied classical Latin texts (leading to the standardized Carolingian minuscule script that
improved readability across Europe). There were reforms in church music (development of Gregorian
chant) and education (cathedral schools). Politically, Charlemagne’s empire, though it split among his
grandsons in 843, laid the groundwork for the modern states of France and Germany and a concept of
a unified Western Christendom. The idea of an imperial authority in the West persisted through the
Middle Ages via the Holy Roman Emperors. Culturally, Charlemagne’s coronation and patronage unified
disparate European tribes under a common Christian-Roman heritage, helping Europe begin to
emerge from fragmentation. In sum, Charlemagne’s imperial coronation was a pivotal positive
milestone: it restored a semblance of Roman continuity in the West, stimulated intellectual revival, and
set Europe on a path of cohesion that would later enable nation-states and further renaissances.
Negative Events:
- An Lushan Rebellion (755–763 AD, China) – A devastating internal war in the mid-Tang era, the An
Lushan Rebellion nearly toppled the dynasty. General An Lushan, a Tang frontier commander (of
Sogdian-Turkic origin), feeling marginalized at court, declared himself Emperor and led a revolt in
755 AD, seizing the northern capital Luoyang and even capturing Chang’an in 756. Causes: corruption
at Xuanzong’s court, high taxation, and reliance on non-Chinese frontier troops created discontent; An
Lushan exploited these, rallying an army of over 100,000. Immediate impacts: The war raged for
nearly 8 years, causing massive destruction – it’s estimated tens of millions died, making it one of
history’s deadliest conflicts. The north China plain was ravaged by battles and famine; cities like
Chang’an were sacked (the imperial palace was looted). The Tang only quelled the rebellion with
difficulty – calling in foreign Uighur allies and regional warlords. Downstream: The Tang government
never fully recovered. The central authority weakened, ceding much power to provincial military
governors (jiedushi) who had helped suppress the revolt but then became essentially autonomous
warlords. Tang finances were wrecked – the equal-field land system collapsed as estates went untaxed,
and the dynasty had to allow tax-exempt mercantile “hu” families and foreigners more influence to
revive the economy. The rebellion also shifted demographics: the north’s population greatly declined,
and many refugees fled south, accelerating the economic rise of the Yangtze delta. Culturally, the
golden age euphoria was punctured – later Tang art and poetry reflect a sense of loss. In summary, the
An Lushan Rebellion was a cataclysm for China, shattering Tang’s prosperity and marking the start of
its decline, even though the dynasty limped on for another century and a half.
- Sack of Baghdad & Abbasid Fragmentation (during the Abbasid Revolution, 750 AD, Middle East) –
While the Abbasid overthrow of the Umayyads in 750 eventually led to a cultural flourishing, the
revolutionary period itself was violent and nearly rent the Islamic realm apart. The culmination was the
Battle of the Zab (750) where the Abbasids defeated Umayyad forces, followed by the sack of the
Umayyad capital Damascus and later relentless persecution of Umayyad loyalists. The new Abbasid
regime relocated the capital east to found Baghdad (762), but even as they rose, the unity of the
Caliphate began fraying: provinces distant from Baghdad started to break away. Causes: Sectarian and
ethnic discontent under the Umayyads (who favored Arab elites) fueled the Abbasid revolt, which was
backed by Persian mawali converts and Shi’a partisans. Immediate impacts: The civil war likely caused
18
tens of thousands of deaths across the Fertile Crescent and Iran as cities like Wasit and Damascus saw
battles or massacres. The Umayyad family (save one prince who fled to Spain) was largely exterminated
at a treacherous “reconciliation” banquet in 750. Downstream: The violence and shifting power center
caused some peripheral regions to drift – in al-Andalus (Spain), an Umayyad survivor established an
independent Emirate (756) separate from Abbasid authority. Similarly, Morocco and Ifriqiya (Tunisia)
fell under autonomous dynasties like the Idrisids and Aghlabids by the late 8th century. Within the
Abbasid lands, the power of Baghdad’s caliphs waned in the later 8th century as regional governors (like
the semi-independent Barmakids in Khurasan) gained autonomy. Essentially, the unity of Dar al-Islam
was fractured earlier than often recognized – the Abbasid Revolution set in motion a trend where the
caliph’s writ did not equally run everywhere. This political fragmentation meant more frequent local
conflicts and weaker central response to external threats (like inability to prevent Charlemagne’s attacks
on Umayyad Spain or to fully control the Silk Road beyond Khurasan). In sum, the violent birth of the
Abbasid order, while leading to prosperity in Iraq, also splintered the once unitary Caliphate,
ushering in a more politically divided Islamic world.
- Viking Raids Begin (793 AD onwards, Northern Europe) – In June 793, Scandinavian seafarers
(vikings from Norway) launched a sudden raid on the Lindisfarne monastery off England’s coast,
slaughtering monks and plundering treasures. This event is often cited as the start of the Viking Age, a
period of recurring brutal raids and incursions by Norse warriors across coastal Europe. Causes: Internal
factors in Scandinavia (population growth, political consolidation, and shipbuilding advances – the
clinker-built longship capable of open-sea and river navigation) pushed warriors to seek wealth abroad.
Additionally, they found rich, undefended targets – monasteries and towns of Britain, Ireland, and
Frankish Europe – made easy prey. Immediate impacts: Communities across the British Isles and
Carolingian coasts were traumatized. Lindisfarne’s attack was followed by raids on Ireland (Dublin
area) and Western Francia within a few years. These raids were extremely violent – churches and
villages were burnt, treasures looted, and captives taken as slaves. The psychological effect was
immense, described by Alcuin as “never before has such terror appeared in Britain.” Downstream: The
late 8th and early 9th centuries saw these hit-and-run raids escalate into larger incursions. By 799,
vikings overwintered on foreign soil; by 820s–830s they started to penetrate rivers (Seine, Loire) to hit
inland sites. Eventually, this would lead to Norse settlements (Danelaw in England, Normandy in France)
and even the founding of kingdoms (e.g. Dublin as a Norse-ruled city-state). In the short term of our
era, the nascent Viking onslaught forced coastal populations to adapt: the Carolingians began building
coastal defenses and watchtowers; some monasteries relocated relics inland for safety. Trade in the
North Sea faltered due to piracy. Thus, what began in 793 as isolated “hit-and-run” violence soon
became a persistent menace that destabilized northern Europe’s frontiers, contributing to the
Carolingian Empire’s later fragmentation and ushering in a new era of feudal fortification and
militarization as communities sought protection from the sea-borne invaders.
Geographic Impact
• Regions Positively Affected: The Middle East and Transoxiana blossomed under the unified
Caliphate. Mesopotamia (especially Iraq around the new capital Baghdad) became
extraordinarily prosperous – extensive irrigation on the Tigris-Euphrates delta made it a
breadbasket, and Baghdad grew into possibly the world’s largest city by 800 (estimated
population 500k to 1 million). The Nile Valley (Egypt) also benefited, now integrated in a vast
market: Egyptian grain fed Arabian and Levantine cities, and Egyptian ports like Alexandria and
Fustat handled booming trade between the Med and Indian Ocean. In East Asia, the Tarim
Basin and Silk Road oases (Kashgar, Khotan, Samarkand) enjoyed a golden period early in the
8th century when Tang influence and then (after Talas) Abbasid influence secured the routes.
These Central Asian cities, often with mixed Chinese, Sogdian, and Turkic populations, thrived on
caravan trade of silk, paper, spices, and horses. Northern Europe’s fringe – ironically,
Scandinavia – also saw gains: the Viking homelands of Norway, Sweden, Denmark experienced
19
an economic upturn as Vikings brought back silver, slaves, and goods from raids/trade. For
instance, hoards of Abbasid silver coins (dirhams) in Sweden attest to lively exchange via Russian
rivers. Over time, this influx of wealth spurred urbanization in Scandinavia (towns like Birka and
Hedeby grew). Finally, Southeast Asia profited from being the crossroads of Indian Ocean and
East Asian trade: the Srivijaya Empire (centred in Sumatra, flourishing ~700–1000) controlled
the Malacca/Sunda straits and grew rich by taxing Chinese and Arab merchant ships. Srivijaya’s
capital Palembang became a cosmopolitan entrepôt visited by Tang envoys and Arab traders,
spreading Buddhism and fostering Malay culture – a clear beneficiary of the era’s increased
connectivity.
• Regions Hardest Hit: The Byzantine-Anatolian frontier turned into a permanent war zone.
From the mid-7th through 8th centuries, Arab raids into Asia Minor were annual occurrences,
laying waste to border themes (provinces). Whole stretches of eastern Anatolia (Cappadocia,
Armenia) saw villages destroyed and were intermittently depopulated as Byzantine and Arab
armies surged back and forth. Similarly, the Maghreb (Northwest Africa) suffered in the initial
Islamic conquest and subsequent unrest – the Great Berber Revolt (740–743) in North Africa
against Arab rule led to chaotic warfare; cities like Carthage (destroyed earlier in 698) never
recovered fully, and the region west of Egypt fragmented (leading to loss of caliphal control). In
Western Europe, the areas targeted by Vikings were brutalized: coastal and riverine
monasteries and towns in the British Isles and Frankish realms saw repeated lootings. The
kingdoms of Northumbria and East Anglia in England, for instance, entered steep decline after
Viking assaults in the late 8th and early 9th centuries; many smaller monastic schools were
permanently destroyed, affecting learning. Ireland’s proto-urban monasteries (like Armagh)
were hit over and over (e.g. the annals record multiple burnings of Armagh in the 790s– 8̱0s),
undermining the Gaelic social order and leading to Norse-Irish mix in coastal ports. Another
hard-hit zone was Central Asia after the Tang–Tibetan–Arab power struggle: Tibet’s expansion
in the 8th century (it even took the Tang capital Chang’an briefly in 763 during the An Lushan
chaos) and Arab influence caused instability – e.g. the Sogdian cities (like Samarkand)
experienced revolts and changes of regime, and Chinese garrisons were lost after Talas (751).
This meant the flourishing oasis culture faced new uncertainties: indeed, in the late 8th century,
many Central Asian merchants relocated to more stable lands (some Sogdian traders moved into
China proper or to the Abbasid court). Finally, Japan and Korea saw indirect strain – not from
invasion, but from overextension due to emulating Tang models: e.g. Japan’s Nara state in late
8th century faced economic distress partly from trying to match Tang grandeur, and smallpox
epidemics (735–737) decimated perhaps 1/3 of Japan’s population, undermining the state – a
crisis that led the capital to move to Heian (Kyoto) in 794. While not caused by war, these
epidemics (likely spread via increased contact with the mainland) made parts of East Asia suffer
during this era. Overall, regions at the interface of civilizations or on invasion routes –
Anatolia, North Africa, coastal Europe, Central Asian Silk Road hubs – endured the heaviest
blows in this dynamic period.
809 AD – 1007 AD
Era Summary
The period 809 to 1007 AD spans the 9th and 10th centuries, a time of consolidation, religious
expansion, and feudal fragmentation across much of the world. At the start, the great empires of the
previous era were fracturing: the Abbasid Caliphate entered decline after 809 (Caliph Harun al-Rashid’s
death), with de facto independent dynasties cropping up – e.g. the Tulunids in Egypt (868), Samanids
in Central Asia (874), and later Fatimids in North Africa (909). The Islamic world, however, continued
20
to expand its faith: by 1000 AD, Islam had spread via trade and proselytization to West Africa (the Sahel
kingdoms), East Africa’s Swahili coast, Central Asia (Turkic peoples converting), and begun making
inroads into South Asia (initial Muslim incursions into Sind and Gujarat). In East Asia, Tang China went
into decline after the Huang Chao Rebellion (874–884) and finally collapsed in 907 AD, fragmenting into
the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. But by 960 the Song Dynasty reunited most of China
(Song was firmly established by 1007). Meanwhile, nomadic powers like the Khitan Liao Empire
(founded 907 in Manchuria) and the steppe confederations of Turks and later early Mongols
(Khitan, Shiwei, etc.) rose in prominence along China’s borders. In South Asia, the post-Gupta
regionalism continued: the Rajput dynasties in the north and powerful southern kingdoms like the
Cholas (who rose c. 850 and by 1000 were a naval empire) characterized India. Crucially, Hinduism
and Buddhism spread further into Southeast Asia – the Angkor Empire (Khmer) emerged ~802 AD in
Cambodia and the Sri Vijaya continued thriving in Indonesia. In Europe, the Carolingian Empire broke
apart by 888, ushering in a feudal age of decentralized lords. The Holy Roman Empire was revived under
Otto I in 962 but remained a loose German-Italian confederation. The Viking Age peaked: Norse Vikings
settled Normandy (911), founded Kievan Rus’ in Eastern Europe (882 with Oleg at Kiev), and reached
North America by circa 1000 (Leif Erikson’s voyage). Christianization progressed: by 1000 AD, most of
Europe including Scandinavia was at least nominally Christian, and new Slavic states (Poland, Hungary)
adopted Latin Christianity, while Kievan Rus’ would take Byzantine Christianity in 988. In summary, this
era saw the old classical centers give way to medieval polities – the Abbasids and Tang faded,
replaced by successor states and new cultural syntheses (e.g. Persianate Islamic culture under
Samanids, Neo-Confucian ethos emerging under Song). It was a dynamic era of religious missionary
work and technological diffusion (e.g. gunpowder and printing gradually moving west, papermaking
reaching Europe by late 10th c.), even as political power was often fragmented and regional powers
(rather than universal empires) predominated. By 1007 AD, the world was a patchwork of these
regional kingdoms and caliphates, setting the stage for the high medieval period.
Power Triad
• Dominant Power: Abbasid Caliphate (in name, 9th–10th c.) – Although politically fragmented,
the Abbasid Caliphate remained the symbolic center of the Islamic world and the era’s
largest cultural-economic sphere. Through the 9th century, the Abbasid court in Baghdad still
wielded significant influence, and the caliphate’s territories (direct or nominal) stretched across
the Middle East. Even as breakaway dynasties ruled locally, they often paid at least lip-service to
Abbasid suzerainty. The Abbasid realm’s cities – Baghdad, Basra, Damascus, Córdoba (under
Umayyad splinter rule), Bukhara – were the most advanced in the world at the time, with
scholars, libraries, hospitals (the great House of Wisdom in Baghdad continued translating and
producing knowledge). The Abbasid dominion facilitated a thriving Indian Ocean and trans-
Eurasian trade: Muslim merchants dominated commerce from Africa to China, and the caliph
was the spiritual leader for an expanding Muslim population across three continents. So, despite
political weakening (especially after the 970s Buyid takeover of Baghdad), the Abbasid
Caliphate circa 1000 AD was still the dominant civilizational force, defining the intellectual and
economic high end of this era.
• Rising Power: Song Dynasty China – After the fragmentation of post-Tang, the Song Dynasty
(established 960) rapidly rose to prosperity. By 1007 AD, the Northern Song had stabilized
most of China proper (though not the Liao-held north beyond the Great Wall) and was
pioneering a remarkable economic revolution. The Song state dramatically expanded rice
cultivation (thanks to improved Champa rice), leading to population boom (China’s population
perhaps ~100 million by 1100, but even by 1000 it significantly exceeded any other country 4 ).
Urbanization soared – Kaifeng, the Song capital, had over 1 million residents around 1000,
teeming with commerce. Technologically, Song China was on the cutting edge: by the 990s, they
had mass-produced printed books, widespread gunpowder weapons (flame-throwers, bombs
21
against Liao), advanced shipbuilding (compass-guided ocean navigation). The Song economy
was moving towards proto-industrialization with large ironworks and cash (copper coin) in broad
circulation. While militarily the Song were cautious (paying tribute to the Khitans instead of
conquering them), internally they were extremely strong in governance and productivity. Thus,
the Song Dynasty was the rising powerhouse of East Asia, set to become the world’s richest
state in subsequent centuries.
• Waning Power: Vikings (Norse Scandinavian Influence) – By the early 11th century, the era of
the independent Viking raiders was drawing to a close. In 809, Scandinavians were an
ascendant threat, but by 1007 the Norse had either settled into Christian kingdoms or were
being absorbed. For example, in England the Viking Danes initially carved out the Danelaw in the
9th century, but by 954 the last Viking kingdom in York fell to the English; even though a Danish
king (Cnut) would rule England for a time (1016–1035), the era of constant expansion was
ending. In Normandy, Vikings settled and became the Normans, adopting French language and
Christianity, no longer “Vikings” per se. Similarly, in Ireland and Eastern Europe (Kievan Rus),
Norse elites assimilated into local cultures. The brutal pagan raids that characterized the 9th
century had largely ceased; Scandinavia itself was Christianizing (conversion of Denmark by
960s, Olaf Tryggvason’s attempts in Norway by 1000). With conversion and state formation, the
Norse peoples shifted from raiders to more settled monarchies. Thus, the “Viking” as a dominant
maritime marauder was a waning force by 1000 AD – replaced in influence by their own
descendants now rooted in places like Normandy and Rus. In the broad view, the decentralized,
fearsome Viking impact was giving way to more organized polities; the Norse cultural
expansion had peaked and now their role was evolving (often into allies or vassals of larger
Christian kingdoms). So, as a distinct power disrupting Christendom and beyond, the Vikings
were on the decline by the close of this era.
22
in the 10th-century Muslim world could use a suftaja (bill of exchange) or sakk (check) to cash
money with agents in distant cities 41 . This banking concept meant a Baghdad trader could
travel to Cairo without hauling heavy coin, then draw funds from a local partner. In Song China,
the government authorized the first paper money (banknotes) in 1020s (just after our period),
but the practice of merchants issuing feiqian (“flying cash”) credit notes began in late Tang and
continued – essentially cash vouchers that could be redeemed in other cities, to expedite trade.
The guild-like merchant associations in both China and the Islamic world helped enforce these
instruments. Maritime trade industries boomed: in the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean, Persian
and Arab dhow ships up to 200 tons plied routes regularly; the port of Siraf on the Persian Gulf
was thriving in the 10th century (archaeology shows affluent multi-story houses of traders
dealing in East-West trade). Joint ventures and early insurance-like arrangements emerged
among caravan traders to pool risk. All this indicates a sophisticated commercial economy taking
shape. Also, new market hubs developed: Cairo (founded 969 by Fatimids) became a major
trade and craft center linking Mediterranean with Indian Ocean; Kaifeng in Song China had
huge markets and specialized shops (one 11th-c. account lists hundreds of trade guilds and daily
market turnover). In Europe, commerce was slower to revive, but by the late 10th century the
Italian city-states like Venice and Amalfi were actively trading with the Levant, and silver from
new mines (like Saxony’s) fueled more coinage (the Ottonian emperors issued consistent silver
pennies). The Champagne fairs in France started around 11th century – beyond our period – but
their foundation was laid by the growing need for East-West exchange (e.g. via Jewish Radhanite
merchants in 10th c.). Overall, this era laid critical groundwork for a medieval commercial
revolution through innovation in credit, currency, and trade networks.
• Agricultural Productivity: Key improvements in agriculture spread and took root, leading to the
Medieval Agricultural Revolution in Europe and sustained growth in Asia. In Europe, the
adoption of the three-field crop rotation system (leaving 1/3 fallow, planting two different
crops in others) by the 10th century increased yields and diversified production. The heavy
moldboard plow (widespread in the damp heavy soils of northern Europe by 9th–10th c.) and
the horse collar allowed deeper plowing and more land under cultivation 33 . One result was the
expansion of settlements into previously uncultivated lands – e.g. large parts of the Black Forest
and Eastern Europe were gradually opened to farming by Germanic settlers (Ostsiedlung)
starting around the 10th–11th centuries. In the Islamic world, new crops introduced earlier fully
took off: durum wheat, rice, sorghum, sugarcane, cotton, citrus, bananas etc., grown under
advanced irrigation in Spain, North Africa, and the Middle East. By the 10th century, Al-Andalus
(Muslim Spain) was exporting olive oil, wine, and grains and famous for its cordovan leather
and Toledo steel, byproducts of its thriving agrarian and artisanal economy. In Song China,
agricultural innovation was epitomized by the spread (circa 10th c.) of Champa rice, a fast-
maturing, drought-resistant strain from Vietnam that allowed two harvests per year in central/
southern China. This led to surpluses and population boom. The government distribution of
improved seeds and promotion of techniques (outlined in agricultural treatises like the 9th-c.
Qimin Yaoshu and later Song works) show an early form of extension services. Likewise, the
invention of water-powered grain mills and windmills (first recorded in Persia in 9th c.,
reached Europe by late 12th c.) began to mechanize processing. These agricultural
improvements significantly boosted food supply – Europe’s population, stagnant after Rome’s
fall, began rising by late 10th century; China’s population soared, as noted. The increase in
reliable food production supported urbanization and freed labor for crafts, thus fueling overall
economic growth into the High Middle Ages.
• Knowledge Transfer and Education: The 9th–10th centuries witnessed vital knowledge
preservation and transfer. In the Islamic world, the translation movement that began earlier
bore fruit in practical terms: medical knowledge from Greek and Indian sources was compiled
and advanced by physicians like al-Razi (Rhazes) who wrote an extensive medical encyclopedia in
the 900s, and Ibn Sina (Avicenna) who around 1000 AD was composing The Canon of Medicine.
23
These texts synthesized world knowledge and became standard references globally 4 .
Baghdad and Cordoba had great hospitals and libraries fostering continuous learning.
Mathematics and astronomy advanced – Al-Khwarizmi’s algebra (c. 820) was built upon by later
scholars like Al-Battani, whose astronomic tables (c. 900) refined planetary motion calculations
and influenced later European astronomy. Crucially, Hindu-Arabic numerals with zero were
transmitted west: by the 10th century, learned people in the Islamic world widely used this
numeric system (an arithmetic revolution that Europe would fully adopt in the 12th–13th c.). In
Byzantine Empire, scholars like Leo the Mathematician (early 9th c.) revitalized Greek learning
and even reputedly invented a signal telegraph system across Anatolia to warn of Arab
invasions. Byzantium’s preservation of classical knowledge continued in its schools in
Constantinople, which in turn supplied teachers to emerging Slavic states (Cyril and Methodius,
Byzantine missionaries, created the Glagolitic/Cyrillic script in 9th c. to spread literacy among
Slavs). In Western Europe, educational structures were at a low ebb early on, but by the
mid-900s monastic and cathedral schools revived under figures like Gerbert of Aurillac (later
Pope Sylvester II), who studied in Catalonia and learned abacus use with Arabic numerals. His
effort symbolized the tiny trickle of advanced knowledge into Europe. Thus, while Europe still
lagged, seeds were planted: the first universities would emerge in the next century. Over this
era, the groundwork for future scholastic growth was laid by the cross-pollination of knowledge
from the Islamic and Byzantine worlds into Western awareness. The spread of paper
(Papermaking reached Spain by the 10th century via Islamic Sicily) made texts cheaper, aiding
literacy gradually. Overall, the collaborative and accumulative intellectual efforts of this era –
especially within the Dar al-Islam – represent an innovation in knowledge as an industry, setting
humanity up for significant scientific and philosophical achievements in subsequent centuries.
24
Francia (Germany) was crowned “Emperor” by Pope John XII, reviving the imperial title in the West
since Charlemagne. This event established the Holy Roman Empire, which would endure (in various
forms) for over eight centuries. Causes: Otto, having defeated the Magyars at Lechfeld in 955 (ending
their threat) and brought Italy under his control, sought to legitimize his rule in both Germany and
northern Italy as the successor of Charlemagne. The papacy, weak and threatened by local Italian lords,
needed Otto’s military protection, so it acquiesced in granting him the imperial crown. Immediate
effects: The coronation of 962 cemented the concept of a German-led empire that spanned from the
North Sea to central Italy. Otto I implemented reforms: he strengthened royal authority by using the
Church (bishops and abbots) as administrators (the “Ottonian Church system”), reducing the power of
secular dukes. The empire provided relative stability in Central Europe – under the Ottonians and their
successors, trade and arts blossomed (the 10th-century Ottonian Renaissance saw a revival in Latin
learning, manuscript illumination, and architecture, blending Carolingian and Byzantine influences –
e.g. the splendid coronation gospel books and the construction of cathedrals at Cologne, Magdeburg,
etc.). Downstream: The Holy Roman Empire became a core political entity of Europe, defending
Christendom’s eastern frontier and fostering a distinct German-Central European culture. It facilitated
the Christianization and assimilation of border regions (Otto’s successors pushed missionary work
eastward to Poles, Czechs, Wends). Also, by tying Italy and Germany together, it indirectly stimulated the
prosperity of northern Italian cities (which, under imperial aegis, grew autonomous and rich by the
High Middle Ages). Though conflicts between emperors and popes would later arise, the initial
formation of the HRE in 962 was a positive move toward political order out of post-Carolingian chaos,
establishing a central authority that promoted learning (e.g. Otto II inviting scholars from Byzantium)
and acted as guardian against external threats (like continued defense against new Magyar incursions
or Slav pagan tribes).
- Song Economic Revolution (10th century, China) – The Song Dynasty’s ascension in 960 ushered in
a sustained economic and technological boom often termed the Song Economic Revolution. By the
late 10th century, changes were evident: mass urbanization, burgeoning inter-regional trade, and
productivity advances. Causes: Peace and unity under the Song (after warlordism of Five Dynasties),
improved agricultural base (Champa rice, better tools), and a government promotion of commerce (the
Song state lightened mercantile restrictions and invested in infrastructure like the Grand Canal upkeep).
Manifestations by ~1000 AD: China had world-leading iron production (as noted, per capita iron
output soared; the army was equipping hundreds of thousands of soldiers with iron weapons).
Porcelain manufacture became a major export industry – the kilns of Jingdezhen were operating on a
proto-industrial scale by the 11th century. The use of paper money started regionally (Sichuan
merchants used paper notes by 990s) to accommodate higher commerce volume. Maritime trade
expanded – Chinese sea-going junks frequented Southeast Asian ports; the Song established a
maritime trade office in Guangzhou and Quanzhou, and taxed trade yielding significant revenue 4 .
The immediate effect was a dramatic rise in living standards for many: more diverse diets (widespread
tea drinking, sugar use), population growth (estimates suggest a doubling of China’s population
between 750 and 1100), and a thriving middle class in cities. Downstream: The Song Economic
Revolution laid the foundation for China’s status as the world’s richest economy pre-modern times 4 .
Innovations like moveable-type printing (invented by Bi Sheng ~1040) and gunpowder weaponry in
Song times would later spread globally. Domestically, the increased wealth enabled extensive public
works (bridges, dikes) and art patronage. It also fostered scientific inquiry (Shen Kuo, born shortly after
1007, would write on geometry, magnetism, etc. building on Song’s intellectual milieu). In essence, the
10th-century surge under Song was a profoundly positive event for East Asia – it represented an early
“modernization” in pre-industrial terms, with remarkable economic dynamism that would influence
trade networks across Asia (e.g. Song coins found in Japan, Indonesia, even East Africa’s Kilwa).
Negative Events:
- Sack of Baghdad by Buyids (945 AD, Middle East) – On December 18, 945, a Buyid army (Persian
Shi’a warlords from Daylam) entered Baghdad and seized control, reducing the once-mighty Abbasid
25
Caliph to a figurehead. Causes: The Abbasids had been weakening – Turkish slave soldiers dominated
politics, finances were dire, and rival dynasties controlled provinces. The Buyids took advantage of a
power vacuum and internal strife, coming essentially as invited arbiters and then taking over.
Immediate impacts: The Buyid takeover marked the effective end of Abbasid political power. The
Buyid emirs, though they left the Sunni caliph on the throne, held all real authority and even
humiliated the caliphate (one caliph was imprisoned and tortured). Baghdad, which had already
suffered economically from disturbances, now saw further decline: chroniclers note neglect of
infrastructure – canals silted, leading to agricultural decline in Iraq’s once-fertile lands. The Buyids were
Shi’a-leaning and occasionally antagonized the Sunni majority (e.g. promoting Shi’ite public rituals),
stoking sectarian tensions and riots in Baghdad. Downstream: The unity of the Islamic realm fractured
further. Without a strong central government, provincial breakaways accelerated – for instance, in
969 the Fatimids (Ismaili Shi’a) conquered Egypt and proclaimed their own rival caliphate, openly
challenging Abbasid legitimacy. The loss of Abbasid control made it harder to coordinate defense; thus,
when the Seljuk Turks later came (11th c.), the disunited landscape succumbed easily. Baghdad’s
cultural preeminence also waned to some degree as regional courts (Fatimid Cairo, Samanid Bukhara)
became new centers of patronage. In summary, the Buyid occupation of Baghdad in 945 is a stark
milestone in the decline of the Islamic Golden Age’s political cohesion: it symbolized the caliphate’s
fall from power and ushered in an era of fragmentation and localism that, despite cultural continuities,
left the Muslim world more vulnerable (e.g. to Crusaders in 11th–12th c., to Mongols in 13th).
- Collapse of Tang Dynasty (907 AD, China) – The fall of the Tang in 907 after years of internal
rebellion and warlordism was a major negative turning point for China. Causes: Long-term erosion of
central authority after the An Lushan Rebellion, plus economic strain (eunuch domination of court,
heavy taxation sparking peasant uprisings like Huang Chao’s 874–884 rebellion), and the rise of
powerful provincial governors who ignored the throne. In 907, the warlord Zhu Wen deposed the last
Tang emperor and founded the short-lived Later Liang. Immediate impacts: China fragmented into at
least 10 independent kingdoms and 5 rival regimes in the north – a period aptly called Five
Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms (907–960). This meant constant warfare among states (e.g. between
Later Liang, Later Tang, Jin, etc.), causing devastation particularly in the North China Plain which was
fought over repeatedly. The great capital Chang’an was abandoned and severely depopulated – once
one of the world’s largest cities, it never recovered its prominence after 907 (the political center shifted
east to Kaifeng, Luoyang). Downstream: The disunity persisted for over 50 years, delaying recovery of
the Chinese economy – although the southern kingdoms (like Wu-Yue, Shu) prospered in trade, the
north’s agriculture suffered. It also left China vulnerable to invasion – the Khitans (proto-Mongolic
people) took advantage by seizing a chunk of the north (founding the Liao Dynasty in 916). Culturally,
some achievements stalled; for example, the momentum of Tang cosmopolitan culture slowed as
regional isolation set in. The disunity only ended with the Song reunification in 960, but by then some
territories (like the north beyond the Great Wall) were permanently lost to “barbarian” regimes (Liao,
later Jin). In sum, the collapse of the Tang was a significant setback for Chinese civilization: it meant
decades of political chaos, economic disruption, and loss of life (the final years of Tang and ensuing
wars saw population decline – census records show tens of millions missing compared to earlier
counts). It took half a century and a new dynasty to heal these wounds, making Tang’s fall one of China’s
great historical tragedies.
- Great Scandinavian Famine and Civil Strife (c. 1000 AD, Northern Europe) – As Scandinavia
transitioned from the Viking Age, it faced its own share of strife. Around the late 10th and early 11th
centuries, there is evidence of severe famine in parts of the North: Iceland’s “Great Famine” of 976–
javascript:; (and again in the 1000s) saw widespread hunger, with perhaps 50% of livestock dying and
many people perishing or forced to leave. Causes: A combination of climate cooling (this period saw the
onset of the Medieval Cool Period after the Roman/Migration era warmth), volcanic eruptions affecting
weather, and ecological overextension (e.g. overgrazing in Iceland, deforestation in Norway leading to
soil erosion) might have triggered successive poor harvests. Immediate impacts: Chroniclers like the
Icelandic sagas record terrible starvation – people reputedly resorted to eating vermin or even corpse
26
flesh in dire times. These famines greatly weakened Norse communities. In Norway and Sweden, such
hardship likely fueled the internal conflicts that accompanied Christianization: fierce battles between
pagan and Christian factions (e.g. Norway’s Olaf Tryggvason imposing conversion by force in the 990s,
facing revolts). Downstream: The famines and internal wars hastened the end of Viking out-migrations
– when home populations are starving, raiding/settlement abroad can either increase (to seek better
land) or decrease (lack of able-bodied men and resources). In this case, it arguably led to a
consolidation: Norway and Denmark, for instance, unified under kings (Olaf II, Sweyn Forkbeard) who
promised stability and relief, but that also meant an end to the old free-wheeling Viking ethos. Some
Norse emigrated permanently (e.g. Greenland was settled by Eric the Red in 980s, partly as an escape
from overcrowding/famine in Iceland, and Vinland attempted around 1000). Many smaller Norse
communities in Greenland and Vinland later succumbed likely due to the harsh climate of the Little Ice
Age that was starting. While less famous than wars, these environmental crises were devastating for
ordinary people and checked the demographic growth of the Norse. By 1007, Scandinavia was on the
mend under new Christian monarchies, but the echoes of those famines endured in sagas and possibly
contributed to the Norse population’s reduced resilience (Greenland’s Norse died out by 15th c.,
possibly due to marginal food supply exacerbated by cooling climate). Thus the famine and civil strife
around 1000 AD in Scandinavia, though regionally confined, were a negative factor that effectively drew
the curtain on the Viking Age, transforming Norse society through trauma and necessity.
Geographic Impact
• Regions Positively Affected: Western Europe’s peripheries thrived anew as stability returned
in the 10th century. For instance, England under the Saxon kings (from Alfred to Aethelstan,
871–939) achieved relative peace after repelling Vikings and unifying the realm – agriculture
flourished in the English shires, market towns grew (London was revived as a major trading port
by Aethelred’s time), and a cultural renaissance (the Winchester school of illumination,
translation of Latin texts into Old English) occurred under royal patronage. Similarly, Catalonia
(NE Spain) and Italy’s northern city-states blossomed: freed from Magyar raids after 955, cities
like Milan, Venice, and Florence expanded trade and self-government. Venice in particular,
leveraging Byzantine and Muslim connections, turned into a bustling commercial hub by 1000,
controlling Adriatic trade. Central Asia’s Samanid Emirate (875–999) was a beacon of prosperity
and learning – centered in Bukhara (in modern Uzbekistan), it sat on the Silk Road and enjoyed
economic vibrancy through silk and spice trade between China and the West. Bukhara and
Samarkand saw a cultural golden age (the Persian language’s renaissance, poets like Rudaki)
under Samanid benign rule. Southern Song China (Jiangnan) – even before full reunification –
was doing well: regions like the lower Yangtze (Suzhou, Hangzhou) had largely escaped the
worst of late Tang wars and, by 10th century, were dense with rice paddies, cash-crop mulberry
orchards for silk, and busy shipyards. When the Song reunified, they chose Kaifeng (in the Yellow
River region) as capital, but the economic gravity was shifting to the Yangtze Delta, which
became one of the richest agricultural zones on earth. This southern Chinese prosperity would
anchor China’s economy henceforth. Additionally, in East Africa, the 10th century was boom
time for Swahili coast port cities (Kilwa, Mombasa, Mogadishu). With the Indian Ocean trade
at high tide under the Abbasids, these African cities grew wealthy exporting ivory, gold (from
Great Zimbabwe’s hinterland), and slaves, and importing Persian and Chinese luxuries.
Archaeology in Kilwa shows substantial stone houses and coins minted, indicating it was
positively transformed by global trade at this time.
• Regions Hardest Hit: The Arab–Byzantine frontier in Anatolia and the Armenian Highlands
remained a contested and ravaged zone through much of the 9th–10th centuries. Although
Byzantium went on a counter-offensive in the mid-10th (Nikephoros Phokas reconquering Crete
961 and parts of Syria 969), the frontier areas had already endured generations of raid-and-
counter-raid. Cilicia and northern Syria were depopulated in parts – cities like Tarsus and
27
Aleppo changed hands multiple times and suffered sieges. Southern Italy and Sicily also saw
devastation: the Muslim conquest of Sicily (827–902) and raids into southern Italy wrecked many
old towns; for example, the sack of Taranto in 927 by Saracen raiders left it deserted for
decades. Northern and Eastern Europe faced the tail end of Viking and Magyar ravages in the
900s – German Saxony and Bavaria were repeatedly pillaged by Magyars until 955 (villages
burned, people taken as slaves to markets in Spain or the East); similarly, coastal Ireland and
Scotland suffered incessant Viking raiding and factional wars (the once flourishing monastic
culture of Ireland was a shadow of itself by 1000, after roughly 200 years of intermittent plunder
and warfare). The Steppe regions around the Aral Sea and Caspian (modern Kazakhstan) were
volatile: the collapse of the Uyghur Khaganate (840) led to power struggles among Kirghiz,
Karluks, and others – trade through this part of the Silk Road waned as these nomads fought.
And by late 10th c., the rising Turkic Seljuks began pushing west, causing turmoil among Oghuz
tribes and precipitating migrations that would soon hit Persia (this turmoil was beginning by
1000, setting the stage for the Seljuk takeover in the 11th). Finally, South Asia’s northwest (the
Punjab, Sind) endured violent incursions: Mahmud of Ghazni’s raids starting 1001 brought
destruction to rich Hindu and Buddhist centers (the famed looting of the Somnath Temple
happened slightly after our period, in 1025, but earlier raids on Multan, Thanesar etc., occurred
in 10th c.). These campaigns entailed slaughter and enslavement, initiating a long period of
upheaval in the north Indian plains. In short, the zones of conflict between expanding faiths
and peoples – whether Latin vs. Norse in Britain, Christian vs. Muslim in Mediterranean,
Muslim vs. Hindu in India, or Chinese vs. nomads in Asia – were hardest hit, often
experiencing depopulation, economic regression, and cultural loss as the old order gave way
painfully to the new.
1007 AD – 1226 AD
Era Summary
The period 1007 to 1226 AD corresponds to the High Middle Ages in many regions – a time of
expanding trade, population growth, and empire-building, as well as devastating conflicts like the
Crusades and Mongol invasions (the latter beginning in the 1220s). At the start of this era, global
population was rising thanks to improving agriculture (world pop ~ 265 million in 1000; by 1200 it
neared 360 million 42 ). In East Asia, the Song Dynasty (Northern Song until 1127, then Southern Song)
presided over a prosperous, urbanized China, even after losing North China to the Jurchen Jin Dynasty
in 1127. In the Islamic world, the once-united Abbasid realm had fragmented: Seljuk Turks swept in
during the 11th century, taking Baghdad in 1055 (though keeping the caliph as figurehead) and
defeating Byzantines at Manzikert (1071). The Crusades (1095–1291) erupted from 1096 onward:
European Christian armies captured Jerusalem in 1099 and established Crusader states in the Levant,
leading to two centuries of holy wars and cultural exchange between Europe and the Middle East 31 . In
South Asia, Muslim Turkic dynasties (Ghaznavids, then Ghurids) invaded the Indo-Gangetic plain – by
1206, the Delhi Sultanate was founded, firmly entrenching Islam in North India. Meanwhile, Hindu
kingdoms (Cholas, Western Chalukyas, etc.) thrived in the south, and Indic culture spread to
Southeast Asia (e.g. the Khmer Empire’s Angkor Wat, early 12th c., and East Java’s Kediri kingdom).
Europe underwent the Feudal Age: strong kingdoms like Norman England (est. 1066), Capetian
France, and the Holy Roman Empire consolidated power, while the Catholic Church reached the height
of its influence (the Papacy asserted authority over emperors in the Investiture Controversy 1076–1122
31 ). Economic revival in Europe saw medieval warm period climate boosting harvests, cities growing
(Paris, Venice, etc.), and institutions like universities (Bologna 1088, Oxford ~1096) emerging. By 1226,
Europe had a network of chartered towns and trade fairs (Champagne fairs linking Italian and Hanseatic
28
trade). In Africa, Ghana Empire (West Africa) gave way to Mali Empire (Sundiata’s victory 1235, just
after our period), while Ethiopia’s Zagwe Dynasty (built rock churches of Lalibela ~1200) and Great
Zimbabwe (thriving by 13th c.) were notable civilizations. Finally, at era’s end, the Mongols under
Genghis Khan (Chinggis) erupted onto the scene: by 1226 they had conquered Xi Xia and obliterated
the Khwarazmian Empire in Persia 43 , presaging the largest contiguous empire ever. Thus, 1007–1226
was a dynamic era marked by cultural florescence (Song China’s brilliance, High Gothic art in
Europe, scholastic philosophy), increased interregional contact (Crusades, Silk Road trade), and
the first stirrings of global Mongol upheaval. It was truly global: from the Temple of Angkor Wat to
Chartres Cathedral to Baghdad’s House of Wisdom, the era produced lasting legacies but also
upheavals that would drastically reshape the 13th-century world.
Power Triad
• Dominant Power: Song Dynasty (China) – Despite losing the north to the Jurchens, the
Southern Song Empire (1127–1279) was arguably the world’s wealthiest and most advanced
state during this period. It commanded South China – the economic engine of East Asia, with
fertile rice lands and bustling ports like Quanzhou (Zaiton) which by 1200 was one of the globe’s
busiest harbors (hosting Arab, Persian, and Southeast Asian traders). Song China’s GDP is
estimated to have been ~25–30% of world output circa 1200, far exceeding any other single
polity 4 . The government was sophisticated, employing a meritocratic civil service (the exam
system in full flower) and pioneering policies like paper money currency nationwide.
Technologically, the Song were far ahead: they had gunpowder weapons (by mid-13th c.,
employing grenades, flame-throwers, and early rockets), advanced navigation (magnetic
compasses for ocean sailing), and printing presses. Culturally, they nurtured Neo-Confucian
philosophy (Zhu Xi’s teachings, 12th c.), painting, and poetry. Militarily, the Song navy was
dominant in East Asian waters (they defeated several Jin naval incursions). While the Song had
strategic vulnerabilities (relying on diplomacy and fortifications to keep the Jin and later Mongols
at bay), up to 1226 they stood firm as a dominant economic-civilizational force, a beacon of
urban sophistication – Marco Polo’s later marveling at Song cities underscores this eminence.
• Rising Power: Mongol Empire – In the early 13th century, the Mongols under Genghis Khan
exploded out of the steppes as a radically new force. From Genghis’s unification of the Mongol
tribes in 1206, in just two decades they conquered the Xi Xia (by 1227) and devastated the Jin
Empire, and annihilated the Khwarezmian Empire in Central Asia (1219–1221). By 1226 (one
year before Genghis’s death), the Mongols had carved out a huge empire stretching from the
Yellow River to the Caspian Sea – unprecedented in speed and scale. The Mongol military
system (highly mobile cavalry, composite bows, psychological warfare, and later siegecraft via
Chinese engineers) was peerless. Though not yet at their maximum extent, by 1226 the Mongols
were clearly ascendant – poised to invade Song China, Russia, and the Middle East in the
coming years. Their rise disrupted the old power balance: they had crushed long-established
states (Western Xia, Khwarezm, the Abbasid-allied state of Transoxiana). Economically, they
controlled the Silk Roads, and their empire’s Pax Mongolica (to fully manifest after mid-13th c.)
would foster unprecedented trade. In our timeframe, the Mongols are the quintessential rising
power – from obscurity to terror of the world in a generation.
• Waning Power: Byzantine Empire – By 1007, the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire was
actually resurgent, having conquered parts of Syria and Armenia in the late 10th century under
Basil II. However, after 1025 the empire entered decline: weak rulers, court intrigues, and
neglect of the military themes led to decay. The catastrophic Battle of Manzikert (1071) saw the
Seljuk Turks shatter the Byzantine army and conquer most of Anatolia – the empire’s heartland
was irretrievably lost, along with critical manpower and grain. Though Byzantium survived (and
even partly recovered during the Comnenian restoration, 1090s–1180s), it was a diminished
power. The Fourth Crusade’s sack of Constantinople in 1204 delivered the fatal blow: Latin
29
crusaders occupied the capital, and the empire splintered into Greek successor states (Nicaea,
Epirus, Trebizond) and a Latin Empire. Although the Greeks of Nicaea would recapture
Constantinople in 1261, the Byzantium of 1226 was effectively ruined. At that moment, a Latin
emperor sat in Constantinople, and Byzantine civilization was in eclipse, its territories mostly
carved up. Thus the Byzantine Empire – so dominant in late Antiquity – was the waning power of
this era, essentially collapsing as a major force. Its economy shrank, its once-formidable navy
disappeared (Italian maritime republics like Venice took control of trade), and population
declined. By 1226, what remained of Byzantine Greek rule (like Nicaea or Epirus) was a regional
rump state. The long arc of Byzantine decline (11th–13th c.) reaches its nadir just in this period,
making it the emblematic waning power.
30
currency circulation vastly increased: the discovery of new silver mines (e.g. MittelEuropa’s
mines in Bohemia, Saxony, and the Harz Mountains in the 12th c.) flooded Europe with silver,
enabling the minting of abundant silver coins (the Italian denari grossi, French gros tournois,
and later English sterling pennies) which facilitated trade. In Song China, paper money (Jiaozi)
introduced earlier became fully institutionalized – by 1120s the Song state had issued the world’s
first government-backed paper currency to solve coin shortages, a remarkable financial
innovation 4 . All these developments in banking, credit, and currency greatly lubricated
commerce, allowing medieval economies to scale up beyond barter and local scope.
• Urban Manufacturing & Guilds: The High Middle Ages saw towns grow into manufacturing
centers with skilled craft guilds controlling production and quality. In Europe, guilds of textile
weavers, metalworkers, tanners, masons, etc. emerged by the 12th century in nearly every
city 4 . They organized training (apprentice-journeyman-master system), set standards, and
often held monopolies. Notable industries: woolen cloth production in Flanders and northern
Italy soared – cities like Ghent, Bruges, and Florence imported raw wool (from England or Spain)
and turned it into fine cloth that was exported widely (by 1300, wool textiles comprised a
majority of Europe’s interregional exports). To power these industries, watermills and windmills
proliferated: in 1086, the Domesday Book recorded ~6,000 watermills in England; by 1300, tens
of thousands dotted Europe, used for grinding grain, fulling cloth, and even powering bellows
for iron forges. This mechanization improved efficiency. In China, the Song era had large
government-run ironworks (such as at Hangzhou and near the capital Kaifeng) employing
hundreds, using hydraulic bellows to boost output to around 125,000+ tons/year by 1078 – a
level not reached in Europe until the 18th c. 4 . Song porcelain kilns at places like Jingdezhen
scaled up to export ceramics globally (Song porcelain shards are found from East Africa to
Philippines). The world’s first mass-production of books happened in this era: Song printers
(often government run) printed millions of pages (by 1100, entire Confucian classics sets were
printed for imperial exams). In the 13th century, Korea’s Goryeo kingdom even invented the
first movable metal type (1234), just ahead of Europe’s Gutenberg by 200 years. So across
Eurasia, specialized manufacturing flourished, often concentrated in cities or regions known for
particular wares: e.g. Damascus was famed for steel blades and silk, Toledo for swords, Milan
for armor, Lübeck for beer and salted fish (in the Hanseatic league). These industries were
usually guild-regulated or state-regulated (in China). They provided livelihoods for urban
populations and produced trade goods fueling long-distance commerce. The guild system also
had social impact: it assured quality and mutual support for members, and in Europe, guilds
often participated in city governance, becoming a backbone of civic life. Overall, manufacturing
became more structured, output increased, and technology (like mills and improved tools)
underpinned a pre-industrial “commercial revolution” during this era.
• Military Technology: Two revolutionary military technologies matured: gunpowder weapons
and the composite bow on horseback (the latter as part of Mongol tactics). In Song China, as
mentioned, gunpowder (invented earlier in Tang) saw its first widespread military use: the Song
navy used bombs and fire arrows against the Jurchen in early 12th c., and by late 13th c. the
Chinese had developed the “fire lance” (proto-gun) and rockets. Knowledge of gunpowder
filtered west via the Mongols; by 1250s-1280s, the Islamic world and then Europe got the recipe
(the first European gunpowder artillery appears in early 14th c. records, but the Mongols likely
used Chinese engineers to employ rudimentary cannon in attacks on Middle Eastern fortresses
by 1260s). The other major factor was the perfected use of mounted archery by steppe nomads
– not new, but the Mongols elevated it to a new level with superior bows (composite recurved
bows with range 300+ meters), disciplined unit tactics (feigned retreats), and coordination (via
signal flags/drums). This allowed an unprecedented string of victories that sedentary armies
could rarely counter until gunpowder firearms evolved later. Also notable: fortification design
responded – Europeans built concentric castles (Crusader castles like Krak des Chevaliers, c.
1170, with multiple layers of walls) and thicker towers to withstand sieges. Siege engines
31
improved too: the counterweight trebuchet (likely first appearing among Islamic armies in
12th c., then adopted by Mongols and Europeans) could hurl 100+kg stones with great force, far
surpassing old torsion catapults. Naval warfare progressed as well: beyond Greek fire (still used
by Byzantines), Mediterranean fleets by 1200 used enormous galleys (50+ oars per side) with
towers for archers. Lastly, the knightly cavalry in Europe reached its zenith: armored knights
(full chainmail, later partial plate) with couched lances became the decisive force in European
battles (e.g. knights at First Crusade’s Antioch charge 1098, or cavalry at Bouvines 1214).
However, their dominance would soon be tested by the rising effectiveness of infantry and
crossbows (the crossbow, considered an important innovation, had become common – the
Genoese crossbowmen were famous mercenaries by 13th c., and a crossbow bolt could pierce
knightly mail). In summary, the era’s military tech saw transitional innovations that would soon
end the medieval status quo: gunpowder on the horizon and nomadic horse archers temporarily
supreme, forcing others to adapt quickly or perish.
32
Universities produced a new educated class – lawyers, theologians, administrators – who
professionalized European governance and scholarship. Notably, Scholastic philosophers like Saint
Anselm (d.1109), Peter Abelard (1120s), and later Thomas Aquinas (d.1274) applied rigorous dialectical
reasoning to reconcile faith with reason. This methodology – disputation and logic – was taught to
thousands of students, laying the intellectual groundwork of the later Renaissance and Scientific
Revolution. Downstream: The university movement led to rapid growth in literacy and knowledge
preservation in Europe. Legal studies at Bologna helped spur the development of common legal codes
(the revival of Roman law concepts shaped emerging national laws). Medical faculties (e.g. Salerno,
Montpellier) collated Greco-Arabic medical knowledge, improving healthcare (though slowly). Perhaps
most importantly, the Scholastics’ effort to synthesize Aristotle’s philosophy with Christian doctrine
created a robust intellectual tradition, culminating in Aquinas’s Summa Theologica (1265–1274) which
systematized theology rationally 4 . This tradition encouraged debate, curiosity, and ultimately
skepticism – sowing seeds for questioning authority, which centuries later would bloom as the
humanism of the Renaissance. In the shorter term, by 1226 universities in at least half a dozen
European centers were producing graduates who became the clerks and diplomats of kings and popes,
fostering more sophisticated governance and cross-border scholarly networks (e.g. via Latin as a
common academic language). Thus, the rise of Scholasticism and universities was a profoundly positive
development, elevating Europe’s intellectual level and aligning it more with the advanced knowledge
of the Islamic and Byzantine worlds (which Europeans now absorbed and built upon).
- Genghis Khan’s Administrative & Cultural Policies (c. 1206–1226, Mongol Empire) – Though
Genghis Khan is often remembered for conquest, his rule also brought progressive administrative
innovations and a certain cultural flowering within the Mongol Empire. After uniting the Mongol tribes
in 1206, Genghis implemented groundbreaking policies for a nomadic empire. Policies and effects: He
promulgated the Yassa (Great Law) – a code that, among other things, forbade tribal blood feuds,
ensured religious tolerance, and harshly punished theft and betrayal. This legal unification helped
end centuries of internecine strife on the steppe, creating an unprecedented peace among formerly
warring clans 7 . Genghis also handpicked talented individuals regardless of origin: he employed
Chinese engineers, Persian administrators, Uyghur scribes (adopting the Uyghur script for Mongolian
writing), thus meritocratizing governance. He famously said that in his administration, “like the four
colors [races] of a horse, all are equal.” Immediate effects included a more efficient and cohesive
empire – for example, the creation of the yam (postal relay) system with stations and horses allowed
messages (and trade caravans) to travel rapidly across Asia. This speed of communication was unheard
of and facilitated governance across vast distances 19 . Genghis’s policy of religious tolerance allowed
Muslims, Buddhists, Christians, and others to live in peace under Mongol rule (for instance, he
exempted religious leaders from taxes and service, winning goodwill). Downstream: These enlightened
policies bore fruit most fully under his successors (the Pax Mongolica of mid-13th century), but even by
1226, large swathes of the Silk Road were safe under Mongol protection, reviving overland trade
between East and West to levels not seen since the Tang era. The mixing of cultures accelerated:
Chinese gunpowder and printing began moving west, while Persian and Islamic knowledge moved east
(e.g. astronomy texts translated into Mongolian, artisans from Samarkand resettled in Mongolia).
Moreover, the Mongol promotion of capable foreigners led to cosmopolitan courts – e.g. Yelu Chucai (a
Khitan) served as Genghis’s chief adviser, introducing Chinese-style taxation in conquered lands which
was far more humane and productive than traditional pillage. This prevented economic ruin in northern
China and Persia, helping those regions recover faster under stable taxation. In summary, Genghis
Khan’s contributions as a state-builder – forging the steppe peoples into a disciplined entity with
uniform laws, fostering trade and communication, and respecting pluralism – were a surprising positive
legacy of his rule, enabling what would become the largest free-trade zone of the medieval world and a
conduit for ideas and goods that greatly benefited Eurasian civilization.
Negative Events:
- The Annihilation of the Khwarezmian Empire by Mongols (1219–1221, Central Asia) – Genghis
33
Khan’s campaign against the Khwarezmian Empire (covering Persia and Central Asia) was
catastrophically destructive. Provoked by the Khwarezm Shah’s execution of Mongol envoys and
merchants in 1218, Genghis invaded with fury in 1219. Cities like Samarkand, Bukhara, Urgench,
Balkh, Merv, Nishapur – some of the most cultured and prosperous in the Islamic world – were
systematically razed 44 . Contemporary chroniclers (e.g. Juvaini) describe entire populations
slaughtered: Merv’s death toll was said to be 700,000; Nishapur’s around 1.7 million (likely exaggerated,
but indicative of huge losses). Many irrigation canals were destroyed, turning fertile agricultural land
(like the Khwarezm oasis) into wasteland. Immediate impacts: The Khwarezmian state collapsed
utterly; Shah Ala ad-Din Muhammad fled and died ignominiously on an island in the Caspian. The
political void left Persia in chaos (which the Mongols would later fill by establishing the Ilkhanate). The
extermination of so many artisans, scholars, and farmers was a massive intellectual and economic blow
– Central Asia, which had been a center of Islamic learning and commerce, entered a long decline.
Downstream effects: Persia and Central Asia’s demographic decline lasted generations. For example,
historians note that cities like Merv and Balkh, which had been among the world’s largest in 1200, never
recovered their importance; the region’s center of gravity shifted west (towards Tabriz and later Herat
under the Ilkhanate). The Mongol terror also sent shockwaves: refugees fled west and south – some
scholars argue the Mongol pressure on Turkic tribes contributed indirectly to the later Delhi
Sultanate’s surge of Turkic migrants into India (as they fled the Mongols). Culturally, countless
libraries and mosques were burned – an incalculable loss of manuscripts and art. The famous House of
Wisdom in Samarkand and similar institutions were likely destroyed, erasing centuries of accumulated
knowledge in that locus. Ecologically, the ruin of irrigation works turned formerly cultivated land to
desert (some of those Karakum canals were rebuilt only in the 20th century). In sum, the Mongol
destruction of the Khwarezmian Empire was one of history’s great civilizational setbacks, akin to the
fall of Rome, leaving a scar on the Islamic heartland and symbolizing the darkest side of Mongol
conquest.
- Fourth Crusade and Sack of Constantinople (1204, Byzantine Empire) – Originally intended to
conquer Muslim Egypt, the Fourth Crusade (diverted by Venetian influence and dynastic intrigues)
instead attacked Constantinople, the Christian Byzantine capital, in April 1204. The crusaders
captured and mercilessly looted the city for days 31 . Causes: Venice, led by Doge Enrico Dandolo,
agreed to transport the crusaders but diverted them to Zara (a Christian rival port) and then towards
Constantinople to settle a dispute in exchange for payment and trade advantages. When promises fell
through, the crusaders (Catholics resentful of Orthodox Byzantines) besieged Constantinople.
Immediate impact: The sack was horrific – many thousands of civilians were killed, churches
desecrated (even the great Hagia Sophia saw soldiers stabling horses inside), and enormous treasures
– accumulated over 900 years of Byzantine glory – were carried off to the West. The Latins tore bronze
statues (including the ancient bronze horses now at St. Mark’s Basilica in Venice 31 ), melted
precious icons, and destroyed or stole countless works of art and relics (e.g. the Venetians stole St.
Mark’s supposed relics earlier, but in 1204 they took relics of the True Cross, saints’ bones, etc.). The
Byzantine Empire was partitioned – a Latin Empire of Constantinople was set up, and Venice took key
ports and islands (Crete, parts of the Aegean) transforming the Eastern Mediterranean’s power balance.
Downstream: The sack crippled Byzantium permanently. Though Greek successor states like Nicaea
retook Constantinople in 1261, Byzantium was a ghost of itself: population had plunged, the economy
(especially artisan production and trade) was taken over by Venetians and Genoese who gained
capitulatory rights. The empire lost its navy and much of its revenue base, rendering it weak against
rising foes like the Ottomans. Culturally, the Fourth Crusade ended the last remnants of East-West
Christian goodwill – cementing the Great Schism (already since 1054) with enduring bitterness. Many
scholars date the start of Byzantine final decline to 1204, as it never recovered strength, falling finally in
1453. The looting also ironically transferred a lot of knowledge and art to the West – e.g. some Greek
manuscripts made their way to Italy. However, overall it was a massive negative event: it destroyed the
greatest city in Christendom (Constantinople’s population fell from perhaps 400k to 50k) and with it,
many irreplaceable classical and medieval Greek works. As historian Nicetas Choniates lamented, the
34
Latins “destroyed in a few days what had survived for centuries.”
- Great Famine of 1200–1201 (Global Climate Crisis) – Around the turn of the 13th century, chroniclers
across multiple regions note unusual climate events causing famine. In Europe, 1195–1202 saw
erratic weather: excessive rains and cold led to poor harvests. England suffered a bad famine in 1196;
France in 1197–98 endured “seven years’ famine” culminating around 1200, where many resorted to
eating roots and bark. More dramatically, in 1200–1201 extreme events (possibly related to a volcanic
eruption) caused a severe famine in Japan – the Shōkyū famine of 1201–02 killed perhaps 200,000 in
Kyushu and western Honshu. Similarly, Korea had terrible famine around 1202; the Goryeo Annals
report cannibalism and mass deaths. In Yemen, 1197–1202 famine was recorded, coinciding with
unusual flooding. Causes: Likely a large volcanic eruption in 1190s (candidates: Vanuatu ~ 1195, or
unknown) injected aerosols causing cooling and abnormal weather. The simultaneous occurrence in
diverse locales suggests a global climate cooling spike. Immediate effects: Massive mortality – e.g.
French annals claim up to half the population died in some villages. Social upheaval followed: hungry
peasants revolted or turned to banditry. In Japan, the famine weakened the Kyushu clans right before
the rise of the Kamakura shogunate, influencing political shifts. Downstream: These recurring famines
underscored the fragility of medieval agriculture. They prompted some changes: e.g. the French crown
under Philip II began developing better grain storage and trade networks to alleviate shortages (an
early attempt at government relief). In Japan, the famine contributed to the decline of the Imperial
court’s credibility and the ascendancy of the samurai-led Kamakura government which promised better
order. In Korea and parts of China, famine undermined public order and might have facilitated disease
outbreaks (there were epidemic reports after the famine). Moreover, starving populations were less able
to resist conquests: historians speculate that hardships in the Western Xia around 1200 (due to
drought/famine) softened them just as the Mongols attacked in early 1200s. While not as famous as
plagues, these climatic famines delivered a heavy demographic blow (perhaps millions died
cumulatively across Eurasia). They were a prelude to the later and even worse Great Famine of 1315–17
in Europe. Importantly, they highlight how even before the Mongol invasions or Black Death, natural
disasters could cause widespread suffering in this era, sharply checking population growth. In
conclusion, the climate-driven famines around 1200 were a significant negative event, demonstrating
the limit of medieval societal resilience and foreshadowing future crises.
Geographic Impact
• Regions Positively Affected: Western Europe’s Atlantic fringe soared in this era. England, for
example, benefited hugely from the Medieval Warm Period (roughly 950–1250): longer growing
seasons meant more consistent harvests (until the 14th c.), and the population tripled between
1100 and 1300. English wool, a key export, enriched not only English monasteries and lords but
also fed the textile industry of Flanders, creating a symbiotic boom. France’s Ile-de-France and
Champagne regions thrived: the royal domain expanded and the famed Champagne fairs
(12th–13th c.) turned towns like Troyes and Provins into bustling international marketplaces,
attracting merchants from Italy, Spain, and the Hanseatic lands. These fairs helped standardize
currencies and credit instruments, strongly benefiting the region’s economy and establishing
France as a central trade nexus. Southeast Asia likewise flourished: the Khmer Empire (capital
Angkor) reached its apogee in the late 12th century under Jayavarman VII – massive temple-
building (Angkor Thom, Bayon) and an extensive irrigation network allowed two rice crops per
year, supporting perhaps 1 million people in the Angkor metropolitan area (one of the world’s
largest cities then). Also, Srivijaya/Malaya (port of Malacca emerging by 1200) and Pagan
(Burma) enjoyed stability and wealth from controlling trade routes (Srivijaya dominated the
Strait of Malacca tolls, Pagan grew rich on rice and as a Theravada Buddhist center with
hundreds of stupas built). Egypt under the Ayyubid Dynasty (Saladin’s family, late 12th–early
13th c.) also did well: with Cairo and Alexandria secure, Egypt regained its status as the
breadbasket and intellectual hub (the Al-Azhar University in Cairo thrived, and trade with Italian
35
cities grew – e.g. Ayyubids exported grain, sugar, and textiles to Europe and imported metal and
timber). Saladin’s enlightened rule and relatively peaceful relations with Italian merchants meant
Egypt’s economy boomed (Cairo was likely the largest city outside China around 1200, at
400,000+ people).
• Regions Hardest Hit: Northern China and North Persia/Central Asia were devastated by the
Mongol onslaught. The Jin Dynasty’s north Chinese provinces (today’s Hebei, Shanxi, etc.)
suffered immensely during Genghis Khan’s invasion in 1211–1215 and subsequent wars: whole
counties were depopulated, the Yellow River’s dike infrastructure collapsed in places leading to
floods, and famine raged. When the Mongols finally conquered the Jin in 1234 (just after our
era), contemporary accounts suggest northern China’s population was perhaps halved from
pre-1200 levels. The once-prosperous Yellow River-Henan region became a wasteland of ruins,
with survivors fleeing south to Song territory – profoundly altering China’s demographic map
(the center of Chinese population and culture shifted permanently to the Yangtze valley
thereafter). Central Asia and Eastern Persia, as noted, were smashed by Mongol reprisals
against Khwarezm: cities like Balkh, Herat, Tus were burnt and their qanat irrigation destroyed,
turning them into ghost towns for decades. It’s estimated that areas like Khurasan lost 3/4 of
their population between 1220 and 1260, a catastrophic decline. This created a power vacuum
that took centuries to fill (not until Timur in 14th c. did the region see significant urban recovery).
The Middle East’s Crusader-Saracen battlegrounds also suffered: repeated wars in Palestine
and Syria (First through Third Crusades, 1096–1192, then later campaigns) depopulated villages
and disrupted agriculture. The countryside of Jerusalem and Antioch changed hands multiple
times, with peasants often fleeing or being killed; large swathes of the Levantine interior became
unsafe, hurting local economies. Although coastal trade towns rebounded under Italian
merchants, inland Syria (except maybe Aleppo and Damascus which maintained continuity under
Muslim rule) lagged. Eastern Europe’s borderlands faced devastation too: the Magyars’ Great
Plain was pillaged by Mongols in 1241 (slightly beyond our end date) but set up by prior
nomadic incursions and internal anarchy earlier. Also, Poland and Silesia were hit by Mongol
raids in 1241. But even before that, the Cumans’ and other steppe peoples’ constant raids in
the late 12th–early 13th had made life in the Rus borderlands precarious. The Mongols exploited
that chaos to conquer Kievan Rus (which happens in 1237–1240, just beyond our scope, but
cracks were visible by 1226). And though Western Europe mostly thrived, there were pockets of
suffering: the Rhineland and part of France saw terrible pogroms and unrest during the First/
Second Crusades (e.g. Rhineland massacres of Jews, 1096, where entire Jewish communities in
Mainz, Worms, Cologne were wiped out), a grim toll on a minority community. In summary,
wherever the Mongol hooves trod or crusader swords crossed, the regions experienced steep
declines – so the 13th century opened with a dramatic contrast: relative peace and growth in
Western Europe, Middle East, and parts of Asia, versus utter devastation in Mongol-conquered
territories, a duality that would shape the coming world.
36
7 19 Kushan Empire - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kushan_Empire
21 22 23 24 25 27 What Rome Learned From the Deadly Antonine Plague of 165 A.D.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-rome-learned-deadly-antonine-plague-165-d-180974758/
35 What was the impact of Attila the Hun on the Roman Empire - DailyHistory.org
https://www.dailyhistory.org/What_was_the_impact_of_Attila_the_Hun_on_the_Roman_Empire
38 Age Patterns of Mortality During the Black Death in London, A.D. ...
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3094018/
37