Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Workplace Application Plan (WAP)
Type of WAP: Control Number: ________________________________
Application of Education
Application of Learning and Development
I. Profile
Name of Learner/ Position and Office Teacher III
Proponent SHEENA KATRINA P. PACINOS
Del Monte National High School
Title of Education/ DIVISION-LED MUNICIPAL-BASED Date of Delivery/ Dates: June 30 to July 01-02, 2025
CONDUCT OF THE TRAINING OF GRADES Participation
PD Program Attended No. of Learning Hours Attended: 24
2, 3, 5, AND 8 TEACHERS ON THE REVISED
K TO 12 CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION Modality _ Face-to-face
– Values Education 8 ___ Online
___ Blended
Name of Learning Department of Education and National
Service Provider (LSP) Educators Academy of the Philippines (NEAP)
Objective/s of the To deepen understanding of the revised K to Classification of LSP __ Government Agency/Institution
Education/ PD 12 curriculum for Values Education 8
program attended ___ Non-Government Organization
To enhance competency in content mapping, ___ Private Institution
unpacking of standards, and development of
performance tasks
To promote the integration of ICT and
learner-centered pedagogies
Name of Immediate Office and Position School Head/ Principal I
Supervisor/School GILDA P. CASTROMAYOR
Head Del Monte National High School
II. Background and Rationale of WAP:
The Division-led seminar equipped Grade 8 teachers with updates and pedagogical strategies for implementing the revised K to 12 Curriculum in Values Education.
This aims to develop teachers to be more equipped with knowledge and strategies in need of the new curriculum. The only thing constant is change. Then, changes are
vital in the development of quality education. This implementation calls for retooling teachers to adapt their planning, instruction, and assessment practices. Having
completed the 3-day training, I intend to apply the insights, skills, and knowledge gained to enhance instructional practices, model learner-centered strategies, and
support peers in unpacking the curriculum to ensure alignment with the MELCs, curriculum standards, and responsive approaches that promote learners’ holistic values
formation.
III. Expected Performance Improvement
Competencies for Development Key Result Area(s) Expected Improvement Means of Verification
in Performance
Indicator
Curriculum content unpacking and mapping Curriculum Implementation Clear alignment of lessons Lesson plans, content maps
with MELCs and performance
standards
Use of ICT in teaching values Teaching and Learning Process Engaging ICT-integrated Class observation notes, screenshots
lessons that promote
reflection and morality
Assessment task creation (performance-based) Assessment and Reporting Authentic assessments aligned Sample student outputs, rubrics
with values formation
objectives
IV. Type of Intervention (Please check interventions you will apply for the implementation)
Job-Embedded Learning Relationship and Discussion- Formal Learning Activities (e.g. Others, please specify
(e.g. Committee Work, based Learning (e.g. Coaching, Training programs, Seminars,
Job Expansion, Job Mentoring, Peer-assisted Conferences, Workshops) ✔ Job-Embedded
Shadowing, Special Learning (PAL), Community of Benchmarking Learning
Projects, Stretch Practice (CoP)) Graduate and Post Graduate
Assignments, Informal
✔ Relationship and
Degree Programs
JEL Activities) Discussion-based
Learning
✔ Formal Learning
Activities
✔ Others: LAC Sharing
and Peer Review
Briefly describe the intervention (e.g. type of special project, nature of committee and role of learners, etc.), and specify duration and office
where learner will be assigned, if appropriate. Use on or two paragraphs.
I will lead a mini-workshop and learning action cell (LAC) session with fellow Values Education teachers in the Grade Level to demonstrate and share strategies such
as content mapping, ICT integration, and development of performance tasks. This will give teachers who are handling subject that are not align with their
specialization. This will be complemented with continuous mentoring and peer feedback. The intervention will span from July to October 2025 within my school.
V. Implementation Plan [the WAP must be implemented within 6 months after the training]
Application Objective [it must be aligned with the PD Program Goals; State what learners will be able to do by the end of the WAP)
To improve instruction in Values Education 8 by applying content mapping, ICT integration, and performance-based assessments
Activities Date of Expected Output/ MOVs Expected Resources Needed Source Success Indicator
Impleme (It represents what is Beneficiaries of Fund (What will serve as
(Activities that learner will ntation predicted or intended to (Human such as evidence of
engage in to meet happen or what will be Immediate Supervisor success of the
Application objective) produced as a result of or peer assigned to WAP?)
implementing a specific guide the teacher/
task or initiative) Material))
Conduct demo lessons using
Enhanced teaching
revised plans; Facilitate LAC
July to Revised lesson plans, Values Ed quality observed
session; Provide peer mentoring Laptop, projector, DepEd School
October documentation of LAC, teachers and through class
modules, peer support MOOE
2025 assessment outputs students monitoring and
outputs
Enhanced teaching
Participate in seminar/ Values strategies among
Year Laptop, projector, DepEd School
workshops related to the Insights, notes Education the teachers of
Round modules, peer support MOOE
subject Teachers ValEd in the
District
Enhanced students
Students outputs like poster, knowledge with
Conduct Values Month Novembe Students and Laptop, art materials, School
slogan, that related to the inculcating Values
Celebration r 2025 Teachers Memorandum MOOE
theme of the celebration Education through
different activites
Prepared by (name and position): Signature Date
07/02/2025
SHEENA KATRINA P. PACINOS
*Reviewed by (name and position): Signature Date
FE P. QUINTAS
07/02/2025
Master Teacher I
*Recommending Approval by (name and Signature Date
position):
Assistant Principal
**Approved by (name and position): Signature Date
07/02/2025
GILDA P. CASTROMAYOR
*for proficient teacher: *reviewed by the master teacher and **approved by the school head/head teacher/OIC (for schools without Master Teacher: reviewed by school head and **approved by ASDS as PDC Chair
*for master teacher: reviewed by the school head and **approved by ASDS as PDC Chair
*for school head: reviewed by the PSDS, **recommending approval by the CID Chief/SGOD Chief (depending on where PPA is being lodged) and ***approved by the ASDS as PDC Chair
*for supervisor: reviewed by the CID Chief/SGOD Chief (depending on where PPA is lodged) and **approved by the ASDS as PDC Chair
*for non-teaching personnel: reviewed by the immediate supervisor or their RPMS rater and **approved by RPMS Approving Authority
Learner refers to the teaching, teaching-related or non-teaching personnel who participated the PD program.
