CIRCUIT: VHURONGA 1 CENTRAL MARKING
SUBJECT: Mathematics JUNE EXAM TOP 10 2025
Position Name Percentage Name of school
1 Nemukula Lucky 96 Edison Nesengani
2 Malaudzi 89 John Mutheiwana
Phathutshedzo
3 Madzhara Light 84 Mugoidwa
4 Vhutshivha 82 John Mutheiwana
Balanganani
5 Govheni 81 Edison Nesengani
Tshinakaho
5 Mafune Fulufhelo 81 Davhana
7 Muthambi Khuliso 80 Edison Nesengani
8 Mudau Thomas 79 Ratshikwekwete
8 Mudau Mpho 79 Mugoidwa
10 Muavha Vhutanzi 76 Mugoidwa
School performance
Position Name of school Percentage Pass Percentage Fail
1 Mugoidwa 83% 17
2 John Mutheiwana 80% 20%
3 Davhana 79% 21%
4 Muthurwana 67% 33%
5 Ratshikwekwete 54% 46%
6 Julius 52% 48%
7 Edison Nesengani 47% 53%
7 Matodzi 43% 57%
9 Tshimbupfe 33% 67%
10 Lwenzhe 03% 97%
Analysis of Results
#Individual Student Performance
This section lists the top 10 students, their percentages, and their respective schools.
- **Key Observations:**
1. **Top Performer:**
- **Name:** Nemukula Lucky
- **Percentage:** 96%
- **School:** Edison Nesengani
2. **Score Distribution:**
- Scores range from 76% (10th place) to 96% (1st place).
- Two students tied at 81% (Govheni Tshinakaho and Mafune Fulufhelo) and two at 79% (Mudau
Thomas and Mudau Mpho).
3. **School Representation:**
- **Edison Nesengani:** 3 students (1st, 5th, 7th)
- **Mugoidwa:** 3 students (3rd, 9th, 10th)
- **John Muthelwana:** 2 students (2nd, 4th)
- **Davhana:** 1 student (6th)
- **Ratshikwekwete:** 1 student (7th)
4. **Trends:**
- Edison Nesengani and Mugoidwa each have three students in the top 10, indicating strong
individual performance.
- The top 5 students scored above 80%, showing a high level of achievement among the leaders.
School Performance
This section ranks schools based on their pass and fail percentages.
- **Key Observations:**
1. **Top Performing School:**
- **Name:** Mugoidwa
- **Pass Rate:** 83%
- **Fail Rate:** 17%
2. **Pass Rate Distribution:**
- Pass rates range from 3% (Lwenzhe) to 83% (Mugoidwa).
- Only three schools have pass rates above 75%: Mugoidwa (83%), John Mutheiwana (80%), and
Davhana (79%).
3. **Fail Rate Issues:**
- **Highest Fail Rate:** Matodzi (57%), followed by Edison Nesengani (53%) and Ratshikwekwete
(46%).
- **Lowest Fail Rate:** Mugoidwa (17%), followed by Julius (18%) and John Mutheiwana (20%).
4. **Data Anomalies:**
- **Tshimbupfe:** Fail rate listed as 37%, but this seems inconsistent as pass + fail should ideally sum
to 100%. This could indicate a typo or unaccounted data (e.g., absentees).
- **Lwenzhe:** Fail rate is blank, but pass rate is 3%, suggesting a possible error or near-total failure.
- **School Rankings:**
1. Mugoidwa (83% pass)
2. John Mutheiwana (80% pass)
3. Davhana (79% pass)
4. Muthurwana (67% pass)
5. Ratshikwekwete (54% pass)
6. Julius (52% pass)
7. Edison Nesengani (47% pass)
8. Matodzi (43% pass)
9. Tshimbupfe (33% pass)
10. Lwenzhe (3% pass)
**Cross-Analysis: Individual vs. School Performance**
- **Mugoidwa:**
- Ranks 1st in school pass rate (83%) and has three students in the top 10 (3rd, 9th, 10th), indicating
consistent performance across individual and collective metrics.
- **John Mutheiwana:**
- Ranks 2nd in pass rate (80%) and has two students in the top 10 (2nd, 4th), showing strong
individual and overall results.
- **Edison Nesengani:**
- Ranks 7th in pass rate (47%), but has three students in the top 10, including the highest scorer
(96%). This suggests a wide performance gap—strong individual outliers but weaker overall results.
- **Davhana:**
- Ranks 3rd in pass rate (79%) but only has one student in the top 10 (6th), indicating solid overall
performance but fewer standout individuals.
- **Ratshikwekwete:**
- Ranks 5th in pass rate (54%) and has one student in the top 10 (7th), reflecting moderate
performance.
**Key Insights**
1. **High Performers:**
- Mugoidwa and John Mutheiwana excel in both individual student scores and overall pass rates,
making them the strongest schools in this circuit.
- Nemukula Lucky (96%) from Edison Nesengani is the top individual performer.
2. **Discrepancies:**
- Edison Nesengani shows a stark contrast: top individual performers but a low pass rate (47%) and
high fail rate (53%), suggesting inconsistent performance across students.
- Lwenzhe’s 3% pass rate is alarming and may indicate systemic issues or data errors.
3. **Data Quality:**
- Inconsistencies in fail rates (e.g., Tshimbupfe’s 33% pass and 37% fail don’t add up to 100%) and
missing data (e.g., Lwenzhe’s fail rate) suggest potential errors in reporting or OCR transcription.
**Recommendations**
1. **For Schools:**
- **Edison Nesengani:* Investigate the gap between high individual scores and low pass rate. Focus on
supporting lower-performing students.
- **Lwenzhe:** Urgent intervention needed to address the 3% pass rate—review teaching methods,
resources, and student support.
2. **Data Verification:**
- Confirm fail rate data for Tshimbupfe and Lwenzhe to ensure accuracy.
3. **Best Practices:*
- Schools like Mugoidwa and John Mutheiwana could share strategies (e.g., teaching methods,
student support) with lower-performing schools like Lwenzhe and Matodzi.
