Dissertation
Dissertation
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, the way consumers shop has undergone a
dramatic transformation. From traditional brick-and-mortar retail to the rise of e-commerce,
the retail sector has continuously adapted to meet consumer expectations. One of the most
revolutionary developments in this space is the emergence of Quick Commerce
(Q-Commerce), a retail model that promises ultrafast delivery—often within 10 to 30
minutes of placing an order. This model is redefining convenience and shaping a new era in
consumer behaviour.
The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated the demand for quick and contactless
deliveries, as health-conscious consumers began prioritizing safety, convenience, and
efficiency over traditional in-store experiences. This has caused a major behavioural shift,
especially in urban markets. Consumers now expect not just "same-day" but "same-hour"
or "instant" deliveries. These evolving expectations have prompted Q-Commerce
companies to invest heavily in technology, supply chain optimization, and marketing
strategies to capture and retain customer attention.
At the core of this industry lies consumer behaviour—the patterns, preferences, and
triggers that define how and why consumers engage with Q-Commerce platforms. Factors
such as time sensitivity, trust in brand, ease of app use, delivery charges, return policies,
and product availability play significant roles in shaping user decisions. Consumers today
are not only evaluating the product and price but also the overall experience—from app
interface to delivery speed to customer service.
With the Indian youth being tech-savvy, busy, and largely dependent on mobile-first
solutions, Q-Commerce is rapidly becoming a daily habit for many. According to a report by
Redseer (2023), more than 60% of Q-Commerce users fall within the age bracket of 18–30
years, and many make repeat purchases within a week of their first order. This makes the
segment both lucrative and competitive, pushing companies to constantly innovate and
differentiate themselves.
In this context, the present study aims to explore the impact of quick commerce on
consumer behaviour, analyze how marketing strategies influence decision-making, and
understand the expectations and satisfaction levels of users. As this sector continues to
grow, insights into consumer preferences and psychological triggers will be critical for
businesses aiming to sustain and scale their operations.
The Quick Commerce (Q-Commerce) industry is one of the most disruptive innovations in
the modern retail ecosystem. It is transforming the way people shop by delivering essential
items to their doorstep in a matter of minutes. With the growing urban population, hectic
lifestyles, increased digital adoption, and rising expectations for convenience and instant
gratification, there is a significant need to examine the role of Q-Commerce in shaping
modern consumer behaviour.
The need for this study arises from multiple important factors:
Quick commerce is driven by speed, trust, and convenience. Consumers are increasingly
expecting near-instant deliveries, not just as a luxury, but as a standard. This expectation
marks a fundamental change in consumer psychology, moving from a product-centric to a
service-centric mindset. Studying this shift helps companies better tailor their offerings to
meet evolving customer expectations.
With so many platforms offering similar services, customer loyalty and satisfaction
become crucial differentiators. What convinces a user to stick with one platform over
another? Is it the delivery speed, customer service, discounts, or product range? This study
is essential to identify the key factors that contribute to user satisfaction, helping
businesses improve retention and reduce customer churn.
The primary users of Q-Commerce platforms are young urban dwellers—college students,
working professionals, and nuclear families—who have less time and higher digital
dependency. Their behaviour and feedback offer real-time insights into current and future
market trends. Since this group is highly dynamic and tech-savvy, their preferences shape
the industry. Studying their choices can help brands optimize their marketing and service
strategies.
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the digital adoption curve and changed consumer
shopping behaviour permanently. Safety, hygiene, speed, and convenience became more
critical than ever. Q-Commerce capitalized on these shifts and positioned itself as a reliable
alternative to traditional shopping. Even after the pandemic, these habits persist. This study
aims to understand how long-term these changes are, and whether Q-Commerce has
become a permanent part of urban consumer life.
From an academic perspective, this study bridges the gap between theoretical concepts of
marketing and their practical application in an emerging business model. It provides
actionable insights for students, researchers, marketers, and Q-Commerce companies. As
the sector is still evolving, understanding real-time consumer insights is both timely and
crucial.
The Quick Commerce (Q-Commerce) model is rapidly becoming a major force in the retail
and delivery ecosystem, especially in urban India. As platforms like Zepto, Blinkit, Swiggy
Instamart, Dunzo, and others compete for market dominance, it becomes essential to
understand the key consumer behaviour patterns and the marketing strategies that
influence them. The objective of this study is to dive deep into these areas and generate
insights that are both academically valuable and practically relevant.
The overarching aim of this study is to analyze the impact of quick commerce services
on consumer behaviour, with a specific focus on user expectations, marketing influence,
purchase decisions, and satisfaction levels.
This study aims to assess how consumers view and value Q-Commerce services. Are
these platforms considered reliable? Do users trust the quality of products delivered? What
kind of needs are users fulfilling through Q-Commerce (urgent needs vs. convenience vs.
indulgence)? These insights will help understand the broader attitudinal perception
towards the Q-Commerce industry.
Another objective is to identify how often consumers are using Q-Commerce platforms, and
for what types of products—groceries, snacks, personal care, medicines, etc. This will
include a demographic breakdown (age, gender, occupation, etc.) to identify key user
segments and their behaviour patterns.
● Is it speed of delivery?
By identifying these factors, Q-Commerce platforms can prioritize features that matter most
to customers.
4. To evaluate the role of marketing strategies in influencing behaviour
● Push notifications
● Personalized recommendations
● Influencer tie-ups
● In-app promotions
This study seeks to understand how effective these tools are in driving purchases, and
whether consumers feel positively or negatively impacted by such strategies.
Once a user tries a Q-Commerce platform, what keeps them coming back? Is it consistent
performance, exclusive deals, or positive delivery experiences? This study aims to
evaluate the overall satisfaction levels and understand what encourages repeat usage
and brand loyalty.
While Q-Commerce offers speed and convenience, users may have concerns regarding:
● Delivery reliability
Identifying these pain points will help companies address the barriers to user satisfaction
and long-term retention.
7. To provide strategic recommendations to businesses
Based on the findings, the final objective of this project is to suggest actionable marketing
strategies and operational improvements for Q-Commerce platforms to better align with
consumer expectations and improve their market standing.
A literature review forms the foundation for any research study by analyzing existing
knowledge, identifying theoretical gaps, and establishing the context in which the current
research is situated. In the case of the Quick Commerce (Q-Commerce) industry,
understanding how consumer behaviour interacts with ultrafast delivery models requires us
to study not only consumer psychology but also digital marketing, e-commerce evolution,
and the role of technology in modern retail.
This review draws from academic literature, industry reports, and recent market research
that provide insights into consumer decision-making, marketing influence, and emerging
digital commerce models like Q-Commerce.
Their model is especially relevant in the Q-Commerce context, where convenience and
emotional gratification (like the joy of instant delivery) are key motivators. The fast pace
of Q-Commerce aligns well with the consumer desire for speed, ease, and control, all of
which influence buying behaviour in this space.
In their landmark book Marketing Management, Kotler and Keller introduce the idea of
holistic marketing, where all elements of a business—product, promotion, people, place,
and process—must align to deliver value to the customer. They stress the importance of
adapting marketing strategies to evolving customer needs and digital disruptions.
Chakraborty and Saha’s study focused on urban Indian consumers and their response to
promotional pricing, revealing that while discounts and cashback offers are powerful tools
for driving short-term purchases, they do not necessarily build long-term loyalty.
This finding is highly relevant in the Q-Commerce space, where platforms frequently use
flash discounts, free deliveries, and cashback to attract users. However, if these
promotions are not backed by quality service and reliable delivery, customers tend to switch
to competitors easily.
Their work highlights the concept of "promotional elasticity," suggesting that businesses
must move beyond just price-based incentives to include value-based engagement like app
experience, personalized suggestions, and prompt customer service.
● The most ordered categories include snacks, daily groceries, personal care, and
beverages.
● Convenience, speed, and UI/UX experience are top factors in consumer retention.
The report also highlights the rising competition among platforms like Zepto, Blinkit, and
Swiggy Instamart, and how brand loyalty is weak, with users often switching platforms for
better offers or faster service. These trends affirm the importance of continuously innovating
and redefining value propositions.
This report focused on the shift in consumer habits post-COVID-19, emphasizing that
online shopping is no longer limited to luxury or tech-savvy consumers. With hygiene
concerns, lockdowns, and social distancing, even older generations began adopting digital
platforms, especially for essential needs.
It noted a 70% increase in first-time grocery app downloads during lockdown periods,
many of which later became regular users. Q-Commerce platforms were quick to capitalize
on this shift by offering contactless deliveries, hygiene-certified products, and
round-the-clock support.
McKinsey's insights on consumer psychology in the age of digital convenience suggest that
today's consumers are driven by immediacy and low-friction experiences. Waiting even a
few hours for a product now seems inconvenient when a faster option exists.
Q-Commerce taps directly into this desire for instant gratification. According to McKinsey,
brands that reduce "purchase friction" by streamlining their order-to-delivery journey often
see higher conversion rates and repeat purchases.
Nielsen's study on digital marketing revealed that social media advertisements, influencer
recommendations, and app-based push notifications significantly impact millennial and
Gen Z buying behaviour. These users often act on impulse triggers, especially when
products are positioned as time-sensitive or limited edition—a technique Q-Commerce
platforms frequently use.
The research methodology is a critical component of any academic study as it outlines the
approach, techniques, and tools used to collect, analyze, and interpret data. For this
project titled “Quick Commerce Industry: Consumer Behaviour and Market Impact,” a
systematic and structured approach has been adopted to ensure accuracy, objectivity,
and relevance of findings.
The primary aim of this methodology is to gather meaningful insights into consumer
preferences, attitudes, and behavioural patterns in the context of India’s rapidly growing
Quick Commerce (Q-Commerce) sector.
1. Type of Research
2. Data Sources
The study relies on both primary data and secondary data to ensure a comprehensive
analysis.
Primary Data:
● The core of the study is based on data collected through an online questionnaire
developed using Google Forms.
● The survey was shared with a randomly selected group of urban consumers,
primarily in the age group of 18–35 years, as this demographic is the most active
user base of Q-Commerce platforms.
Secondary Data:
○ Company websites and whitepapers from platforms like Blinkit and Zepto
This blend of data provides both practical consumer insights and theoretical context.
3. Sampling Methodology
● Sample Size: A total of 80 respondents were surveyed. This sample size was
chosen to ensure the feasibility of analysis while maintaining diversity in responses.
● Demographics Covered:
● Data was automatically recorded in Google Sheets for easy export and analysis.
○ Percentage analysis
● Interpretation focused on trends, patterns, and anomalies that could inform marketing
or business strategy.
● What concerns (e.g., pricing, security, product quality) affect user trust?
7. Ethical Considerations
● Participation in the survey was voluntary, with respondents given the option to skip
any question.
● Responses were kept confidential and used strictly for academic purposes.
● All secondary sources have been cited and acknowledged to maintain academic
integrity.
1.6 Limitations of the Study
While this study makes a sincere attempt to explore the evolving landscape of the Quick
Commerce (Q-Commerce) industry and understand consumer behaviour within it, it is
important to acknowledge certain limitations that may impact the depth, generalizability,
and accuracy of the findings. Every research study is constrained by resources, scope, and
practical realities, and this one is no exception.
Recognizing these limitations allows readers and future researchers to interpret the results
with the appropriate context and also presents opportunities for improvement in subsequent
studies.
One of the key limitations of the study is the relatively small sample size of 80
respondents. While efforts were made to ensure diversity in terms of age, gender, and
occupation, the sample may not fully represent the broader population of Q-Commerce
users across different cities, socio-economic classes, and regions in India.
A larger sample would allow for more robust statistical analysis and the identification of more
granular behavioural patterns.
2. Urban-Centric Focus
The survey responses were collected primarily from urban populations, particularly Tier-I
cities such as Kolkata, Mumbai, and Delhi. While this aligns with the current Q-Commerce
business model—which primarily targets urban consumers—the findings may not accurately
reflect the perceptions and preferences of:
As Q-Commerce begins to expand into smaller towns, future research should aim for a more
inclusive geographic distribution.
The primary data was collected using Google Forms, which naturally limits responses to
those who:
● Have access to smartphones and the internet
This method may exclude older individuals, less tech-savvy users, and people without
regular access to digital devices. As a result, the sample is likely skewed toward younger,
more digitally active demographics.
4. Time Constraints
Due to academic deadlines and limited research duration, the study was conducted over a
short period. This restricts the ability to:
Consumer preferences and platform performance can evolve rapidly in dynamic industries
like Q-Commerce, and a longitudinal study would offer deeper insights.
5. Self-Reported Data
All responses in the survey were self-reported by participants. While anonymity encourages
honesty, self-reporting carries inherent risks such as:
● Misinterpretation of questions
As a result, some answers may reflect perception more than actual usage patterns.
● Pricing models
● Delivery reliability
● Marketing styles
A more platform-specific analysis would require a larger sample and additional research
tools, such as in-depth interviews or platform audits.
The study touches on marketing influences such as social media ads, influencer
recommendations, and app notifications. However, it does not include a full analysis of
marketing ROI, brand recall, or A/B testing results that companies typically use to evaluate
the effectiveness of their campaigns. These advanced metrics are often proprietary and not
publicly available.
The research relies on what consumers say they do, not what they actually do in real
time. Behavioural tracking tools like heat maps, in-app user journeys, and order logs would
provide more accurate insights but are beyond the scope of this academic study.
The study does not segment users based on income levels or spending behaviour, which
could have offered useful insights into how affordability affects platform preference, delivery
fee tolerance, and premium service adoption.
A well-organized and thoughtfully structured report is crucial for presenting research findings
in a clear and logical manner. In this project, titled “Quick Commerce Industry: Consumer
Behaviour and Market Impact,” the content is divided into four main chapters along with
supporting sections such as a bibliography and annexure. Each chapter is strategically
planned to build upon the previous one, guiding the reader through the research
journey—from background understanding to data-driven conclusions.
The following is a detailed outline of the chapter planning used in this study:
Chapter 1: Introduction
This chapter lays the foundation of the study. It starts by explaining the background and
the rise of Quick Commerce as a new-age retail model. It highlights the need for the study,
especially in the context of changing consumer habits and the digital economy. The
objectives of the research are clearly stated, outlining what the study aims to achieve. The
literature review explores relevant academic and industry work to provide a theoretical
base. The research methodology section describes the tools and approaches used to
collect and analyze data, while the limitations discuss the boundaries and challenges of the
study. This chapter sets the tone for the rest of the report by defining the scope and intent of
the research.
This chapter provides a theoretical and contextual understanding of the key concepts
involved in the study. It introduces and defines Quick Commerce, explaining how it differs
from traditional retail and e-commerce. The chapter is divided into two major parts:
This is the core analytical chapter of the project. It presents the primary data collected
from the survey of 80 respondents. Each survey question is accompanied by:
● Percentage analysis
● Interpretation of results
The data is analyzed to extract insights into user preferences, frequency of app usage,
favourite platforms, purchase triggers, satisfaction levels, and perceptions of delivery
experience. Patterns and trends are identified and discussed in detail.
Additionally, this chapter draws connections between the survey findings and the literature
reviewed in Chapter 1.4. It highlights how consumer behaviour aligns or contrasts with
theoretical expectations and current market trends.
The final chapter brings together all the key insights and addresses the objectives outlined in
Chapter 1.3. It summarizes the main findings of the research and offers a concise overview
of consumer behaviour in the Q-Commerce space.
● Customer engagement
● Marketing effectiveness
● Platform loyalty
● Service satisfaction
The recommendations are based on real survey responses and market understanding,
making them actionable for stakeholders in the industry.
Bibliography
This section lists all the sources referred to throughout the project, including:
Annexure
The annexure includes the original survey questionnaire used to collect primary data. It
acts as a reference point for the methodology section and allows readers to understand the
type of questions asked during the data collection process.
This study is structured around several key components that interact with each other to
shape consumer responses to Q-Commerce platforms:
1. Independent Variables – Marketing Strategies
Marketing strategies act as external stimuli that influence consumer behaviour. These
include:
● Pricing Tactics: Discount coupons, flash sales, cashback offers, and free delivery
thresholds.
● Delivery Experience: Real-time order tracking, delivery agent rating, and on-time
performance.
These marketing variables are designed to stimulate consumer interest, create urgency, and
ultimately convert users into customers.
The goal of Q-Commerce marketing strategies is to impact consumer decisions and actions.
The key behavioural outcomes include:
● Impulse Buying: Whether consumers buy things they didn’t plan due to time-limited
offers.
● Retention and Loyalty: Whether users return for repeat purchases and recommend
to others.
● Occupation – Students and working professionals prefer speed and flexibility due to
time constraints.
● Income Level – Determines price sensitivity and willingness to pay for premium
services.
● Digital Literacy – Plays a role in app navigation, adoption, and use frequency.
4. Theoretical Underpinnings
Several established models of marketing and consumer behaviour are incorporated into this
conceptual framework:
● Kotler’s 4Ps and 7Ps Model: Emphasizes how Product, Price, Place, and
Promotion (and additional Ps like People, Process, Physical Evidence) collectively
influence consumer perception.
For example, when a consumer receives a push notification about a flash sale on Zepto,
this acts as a marketing input (independent variable). The consumer’s attitude towards the
app, past experience, and income level may moderate their decision to open the app and
place an order (dependent variable). If the delivery is fast and the product quality is high,
the consumer may experience satisfaction, leading to repeat usage and platform loyalty.
Visual Representation (Suggested for Project Report)
css
CopyEdit
[Marketing Inputs] ──► [Consumer Attitudes] ──► [Purchase Decision &
Satisfaction]
│ ▲
└────► Influenced by Demographic & Psychological Factors
This conceptual framework serves as the foundation for interpreting the primary data
collected in this research. It helps in:
By integrating theory and real-world application, this framework ensures that the study
remains academically rigorous while also being practically insightful for Q-Commerce
brands.
These segments expect fast, hassle-free, and affordable delivery of groceries, snacks,
beverages, household items, and personal care products.
Blinkit
Zepto
● Founded in 2021 and gained rapid popularity for delivering groceries in under 10
minutes.
Swiggy Instamart
● A vertical under the Swiggy brand, leveraging its existing delivery fleet.
● Focuses on offering a wide variety of products from daily essentials to quick snacks.
● Known for its user-friendly app and late-night delivery options.
Dunzo Daily
The Indian consumer, especially in metro cities, has rapidly adapted to the Q-Commerce
model. Some emerging behavioural trends include:
● Impulse Buying: Time-limited deals and push notifications often lead to unplanned
purchases.
● Low Patience for Delays: Delivery delays beyond the promised timeframe often
lead to dissatisfaction and app-switching.
● Brand Switching: Most Q-Commerce users are not loyal to one brand—they
frequently compare prices, discounts, and delivery timelines.
To stay competitive in this crowded market, Q-Commerce brands in India invest heavily in
aggressive marketing strategies, including:
● Flash Sales and Coupons: Used to create urgency and attract price-sensitive
users.
● In-App Gamification: Spin-the-wheel offers, daily streak rewards, etc., to increase
engagement.
Brands are also experimenting with festive campaigns, like "15-Minute Diwali Shopping" or
"Quick Rakhi Delivery", to align with cultural moments and capitalize on seasonal demand.
Although Tier-I cities are the strongholds of Q-Commerce, there is growing traction in
Tier-II cities such as Lucknow, Indore, Jaipur, and Coimbatore. However, challenges
remain:
● Logistical Constraints: Traffic congestion, narrow lanes, and lack of trained delivery
agents in certain areas.
● Operational Costs: High delivery expenses for low average order value items.
● Profitability Pressure: Despite large volumes, many companies are still burning
cash due to aggressive pricing and delivery costs.
The Indian government is gradually increasing scrutiny over data privacy, gig worker
rights, and last-mile delivery standards. Regulations related to FSSAI licensing, labor
laws, and e-waste management are expected to influence how Q-Commerce platforms
operate in the coming years.
7. Future Outlook
India’s Q-Commerce space is evolving from being offer-driven to becoming value-driven.
Companies are now focusing on:
● Subscription models
● AI-driven personalization
The next phase of growth will be driven by data intelligence, last-mile efficiency, and
loyalty-based engagement.
Across the globe, Q-Commerce is emerging as a powerful vertical within the broader
e-commerce and retail ecosystem. Cities in Europe, North America, the Middle East, and
Asia are witnessing a rapid rise in on-demand micro-fulfillment models, led by startups,
legacy e-commerce giants, and even grocery chains.
These technologies and innovations are now being adopted by major players in the U.S.,
Europe, Latin America, and Southeast Asia.
GoPuff (USA)
● One of the first Q-Commerce platforms to gain national recognition in the United
States.
● Offers membership plans (GoPuff Fam) for free deliveries and exclusive deals.
Glovo (Spain)
● Offers not just groceries, but also food, medicine, and parcel delivery.
Zapp (UK)
● High value on convenience: Consumers are willing to pay a premium for faster
delivery and better service.
● Over 70% of urban Gen Z and millennial users in Europe expect same-day or
same-hour delivery as a default option.
● In the U.S., subscription-based users (like GoPuff members) exhibit 2.3x higher
monthly spend compared to non-members.
● Subscription loyalty models – Offering perks like zero delivery fees, early access
to deals, or priority delivery.
● Labour laws and gig worker policies – Especially in the EU and California, where
worker protection laws are tightening.
● Profitability pressures – Q-Commerce margins are thin due to high delivery costs
and low order values.
● Last-mile robotics & drones: In pilot phases in countries like the U.S., Japan, and
China.
● Data analytics dashboards: Helping brands track conversion rates, repeat usage,
and customer churn in real-time.
● Cloud kitchens and delivery-only stores: Expanding the Q-Commerce model to
include food, bakery items, and local crafts.
In mature Q-Commerce markets like Germany, France, and the Netherlands, there is an
increasing push towards eco-friendly delivery models, including:
● Bicycle deliveries
● Electric scooters
Moreover, some platforms are experimenting with community commerce, where deliveries
are made in batches to reduce carbon impact, or customers can pick up from local fulfillment
kiosks.
CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Conclusion
Firstly, the study confirms that Q-Commerce appeals most strongly to young, digitally
connected consumers—primarily those aged between 18–25. This demographic values
speed, convenience, and tech-enabled experiences over traditional shopping models.
For them, Q-Commerce is not just a luxury but a lifestyle habit integrated into their daily
routines.
The survey reveals that delivery speed is the most critical driver of usage. Users expect
items to be delivered within 10 to 30 minutes, and platforms that consistently meet this
expectation enjoy higher satisfaction and repeat usage. However, discounts and offers
also play a major role, particularly for price-sensitive customers such as students and young
professionals. This highlights a balance between service efficiency and perceived value.
Among the major players, Zepto and Blinkit emerged as the most preferred platforms,
owing to their aggressive marketing, intuitive user interfaces, and rapid expansion of dark
stores. While consumers appreciate the convenience these platforms offer, the study also
found that brand loyalty is weak—users frequently switch between apps based on current
promotions or faster delivery options. This suggests that the Q-Commerce space is highly
competitive, and maintaining customer retention requires more than just pricing
advantages.
However, the research also uncovered some concerns. More than half of the respondents
have experienced issues such as late deliveries, wrong items, or lack of customer support.
While these issues may not immediately drive users away due to the convenience offered,
they do affect long-term trust and willingness to pay for premium services.
In summary, this study concludes that Q-Commerce in India is growing rapidly but still
maturing. It has successfully disrupted traditional shopping models but now faces the
challenge of sustainability, profitability, and consistent service quality. Platforms that
can optimize operations, personalize marketing, and provide seamless customer
experiences will be best positioned to lead the market in the long run.
4.2 Recommendations
Based on the insights gathered from the survey and supporting research, the following
recommendations are proposed for Quick Commerce companies to improve consumer
satisfaction, marketing effectiveness, and long-term growth:
● Use AI-powered route planning to avoid delays and optimize delivery paths.
● Offer compensation (e.g., coupons) for missed delivery windows to retain trust.
● Add easy-to-access help centers in-app with FAQs and live chat.
● Partner with influencers who match your brand tone and resonate with your
customer base.
● Notify users about how their data (e.g., wishlist, location) is used for personalization.
✅ 9. Sustainability as a Differentiator
● Use eco-friendly packaging and electric vehicles wherever feasible.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A bibliography is an essential part of any academic research. It acknowledges the sources of
information that have contributed to the research and ensures transparency, credibility, and
academic integrity. For this project on the Quick Commerce industry, a combination of
books, research papers, industry reports, and online articles has been consulted.
1. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th Edition). Pearson
Education.
2. Sethna, Z., & Blythe, J. (2016). Consumer Behaviour. SAGE Publications.
3. Solomon, M. R. (2017). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being (12th
Edition). Pearson Education.
4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes.
Industry Reports
8. McKinsey & Company (2023). The Rise of Instant Delivery and What It Means for
Urban Consumers.
9. NielsenIQ (2021). The Power of Personalization in Digital Commerce.
13.The Economic Times – “Zepto plans to double dark store network in 2024”
Others