Almatar, 2022
Almatar, 2022
Article
Transit-Oriented Development in Saudi Arabia: Riyadh as
a Case Study
Khalid Mohammed Almatar
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin
Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31451, Saudi Arabia; kmalmatar@[Link]
2. Literature Review
Peter Calthorpe introduced the TOD concept with a specific focus on transit plan-
ning [11]. TOD has mainly been categorized as one kind of sustainable urban transport
that creates a high level of human interaction. Bernick and Cervero have strongly focused
on the three Ds’ (design, diversity, and density) role in TOD [11,12]. During the 1980s, after
observing suburban congestion, researchers and urban designers focused on alternatives,
such as developments around transit areas, with the main objective of reducing motorized
trips. During the Paris Agreement in 2015, the kingdom (KSA) showed its commitment
to reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases and adhering to the mitigations related
to climate change [13]. The kingdom has demonstrated its dedication and capacity to
reduce more than 130 million tons of carbon dioxide by the end of 2030 [13]. The vision of
2030 is set out in the country’s national determined contribution (NDC), which is aligned
with the United Nations’ concept on the issue of climate change. This NDC can bring
a high level of economic diversification and become highly adaptive to the impact of
climate change [13,14]. According to Noland et al. (2017), both transportation and infras-
tructure are considered significant forms of urbanization [15]. In the current economic
times, urban-based transportation is gaining close attention. It is a significant pillar for
travelers’ mobility that focuses specifically on expanding these areas. Statistics revealed
that 80% of the country’s population lives in urban areas, which shows that urbanization
is at its peak in the country [15]. Papa and Bertolini (2015) indicated that since Riyadh
is becoming a financial hub for Saudi Arabia, and the current king is looking forward to
expanding its position in the context of the goal for 2030, the congestion problem may
increase rapidly [16]. Thus, the country desperately needs TOD to achieve sustainable
transportation that aims to minimize or eradicate environmental problems, maximizing
the quality of life by enhancing social-based inclusions. Wey and Chiu (2013) conducted a
study in which the benefits related to TOD were mentioned [17]. The study was conducted
Sustainability 2022, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 10
Sustainability 2022, 14, 16129 enhancing social-based inclusions. Wey and Chiu (2013) conducted a study in which 3 of the
10
benefits related to TOD were mentioned [17]. The study was conducted in Turkey, in
which the sustainable tourism factor was highlighted. The researcher used quantitative
inmeasures
Turkey, in towhich
complete the research,
the sustainable using quantification
tourism for the same
factor was highlighted. The purpose.
researcherThe used re-
searcher used a sample of 404 individuals and found that countries
quantitative measures to complete the research, using quantification for the same purpose. can achieve social
benefits
The by implementing
researcher used a sample [Link] The
404 analysis
individualsfoundand that social
found indicators
that countries include the sta-
can achieve
tus ofbenefits
social humanby health, community-based
implementing livability,found
TOD. The analysis and the
thatequity factor. Theinclude
social indicators researcher
the
revealed
status that TOD
of human is helpful
health, for the people
community-based of Turkey
livability, and theto obtain
equity affordable, green, and
factor. The researcher
sustainable
revealed thattransport that could
TOD is helpful for positively
the peopleincrease
of Turkeytheirtosocial
obtain well-being
affordable, [17].
green, and
sustainable transport that could positively increase their social well-being [17]. was con-
There was another study conducted in the same domain, and the research
ducted by was
There Renne (2009).study
another The researcher
conductedidentified
in the same that one of the
domain, andmain benefits was
the research of TODcon-is
the achievement
ducted by Renne (2009).of environmental
The researchersustainability
identified using
that one environmental indicators.
of the main benefits Envi-
of TOD
isronmental sustainability
the achievement includes overcoming
of environmental sustainabilitypollution, creating a betterindicators.
using environmental environment Envi-for
wildlife, and
ronmental creating a includes
sustainability manageable vehicle system.
overcoming pollution,These elements
creating a better areenvironment
achievable, and for
the researcher
wildlife, has identified
and creating them before
a manageable vehicle[18]. Endorsing
system. These the same idea,
elements Zandiatashbar,
are achievable, and
the researcher
Hamidi, Foster,hasand identified themrevealed
Park (2019) before [18].
that,Endorsing
apart fromthe same idea, Zandiatashbar,
environmental indicators, cer-
Hamidi, Foster, and
tain indicators Park (2019)
of economic revealed that,
well-being apart from
are directly andenvironmental indicators,
indirectly connected certain
with TOD
indicators
[19]. Theseofeconomic
economicindicators
well-being aregain
help directly and indirectly
immense benefits and connected
viability with
in theTOD [19].
transpor-
These
tationeconomic
system and indicators
benefithelp gain immense
the overall community benefits and
[19]. Theviability
studiesincovered
the transportation
above were
system andconducted
generally benefit the in overall community
the European [19].and
areas, Thevery
studies
fewcovered
studies above were conducted
have been generally
conducted
specificallyinintheSaudi
European
Arabia,areas, and very
especially few studies
in Riyadh. have been
Therefore, thisconducted
study wasspecifically
carried outinto
Saudi Arabia,
determine theespecially
benefit ofinTOD Riyadh. Therefore,
in Riyadh [Link] study was carried out to determine the
benefit of TOD in Riyadh City.
3. Methods
3. Methods
3.1. Study Setting
3.1. Study Setting
In the Arabian Peninsula, the Saudi Arabian kingdom is the largest nation, with a
In the Arabian Peninsula, the Saudi Arabian kingdom is the2 largest nation, with a
population of more than 30 million and an area of 2.14 million km . The geographical focus
population of more than 30 million and an area of 2.14 million km2 . The geographical focus
of this research study was Riyadh City, the capital of Saudi Arabia, with a population of
of this research study was Riyadh City, the capital of Saudi Arabia, with a population of
5.5million
5.5 million(Figure
(Figure1).1).Currently,
Currently, thethe spatial
spatial area
area of Riyadh
of Riyadh City
City is almost
is almost 30003000
km,km, cover-
covering
ingdistricts
209 209 districts
and 13and 13 municipalities.
municipalities. In 2014,Inthe
2014,
citythe city initiated
initiated the integrated
the integrated transporttransport
system,
system, with a budget of more than USD 23 billion. This
with a budget of more than USD 23 billion. This was important, as the city’s was important, as population
the city’s pop- is
ulation istoexpected
expected reach 10 to reachby
million 10 2030.
million by 2030.
[Link]
Figure RiyadhCity
CityMap.
Map.
Sustainability 2022, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 10
4. Results
The main aim of this section is to present the findings to address the research question.
This section presents information on the benefits of transit-oriented development in Riyadh,
Saudi Arabia.
TOD could reduce GHG by almost 35%, smog by 20%, and respiratory disease by 7.9%
through proper transportation planning. The plan includes reducing the use of automobiles
and increasing access to transportation.
Table 3 lists the findings of the TOD economic benefits in Riyadh City from a general
and personal perspective. From a personal perspective, the economic benefit of TOD in
terms of providing business opportunities obtained the highest score of 4.2. On the other
hand, from a general perspective, the findings show that the maximum economic benefit
that could be achieved is that TOD would encourage the use of public transport.
The findings of the TOD social benefits in Riyadh City from a general and personal
perspective are shown in Table 4. From a personal perspective, the TOD benefit in providing
services that enhance transit community mobility attained the highest mean score of 3.08.
From a general point of view, the findings show that the maximum benefit that could be
achieved is that TOD would provide options for mobility to older and young people who
do not have cars.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 16129 7 of 10
5. Discussion
The present study used a mixed methodology to determine the benefits of transit-
oriented development in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. The findings of this study show that
TOD in Riyadh City would positively impact economic, environmental, and social aspects.
One of the important findings of this study is that TOD would increase property value,
which has been accepted at large. Previous studies have demonstrated that TOD has a
positive effect on home values and land prices. For example, a study was carried out in
Hong Kong, where it was found that TOD increased the housing price between 5–35% [20].
In another study carried out by Zhang, (2020) in Wuhan, China, it was found that properties
that lay within 100 m of transit showed an increase of 17% in value, whereas those within
100–400 m showed an increase of 8% in their property value [11].
The study findings show that TOD would provide health benefits due to increased
bicycling and walking. Considering this benefit, a study was conducted in Washington,
which demonstrated that an increase in walking and cycling helps in reducing obesity.
Many problems are related to obesity, such as diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and high
blood pressure. Through TOD implementation, urban development and lower pollution
can be achieved, which results in health benefits. The findings of this study demonstrate
a relationship between physical activity and TOD. This finding is in line with studies
conducted around the world [11,20]. A number of studies have demonstrated that transit-
oriented development correlates with physical activity, irrespective of whether people
live near TOD [21–23]. Studies have shown that transit travelers take walking trips more
to access different services [21–23]. The findings of this study, along with the previous
studies, clearly show that TOD increases walking activities. Considering these health
benefits, further studies that involve medical records and direct measurements are needed
to determine the actual health benefits associated with TOD implementation.
In the last few years, the reduction in the use of private vehicles has been the major
focus of research because of the negative effect on the environment as well people’s social
life. The findings of this study show that implementing TOD would be beneficial in
mitigating these issues. These findings are in line with previous studies, where it was
demonstrated TOD would improve comfort and convenience by increasing access to
activities and services, such as economic benefits, medical services, and financial savings,
as well as enjoyment from being able to attend recreational activities [24,25].
In economic terms, TOD would bring economic benefits to Riyadh City. The findings
of this study revealed that TOD would support the economy of Riyadh City by creating jobs.
These findings align with previous studies, which stated that investing in TOD supports
economic activities [26,27]. In one study, it was found that people living closer to the
public transit service usually work more days every year as compared to those who lack
Sustainability 2022, 14, 16129 8 of 10
access to this transit service [28]. Transit ridership would increase by implementing TOD,
bringing additional revenues into the transit system and localities. This finding is in line
with previous studies [26,27]. One study demonstrated that TOD would reduce the need
for the construction of roads as well as the cost associated with the long-term maintenance
of roads [28]. In another study, it was found that TOD would reduce the transportation
cost of highways and externalities, such as infrastructure expenses, road maintenance, and
fuel consumption costs [29]. The results of this study generated a general hope among
most participants that implementing TOD would reduce household spending as they
change their mode of transportation by switching to use public transport. Moreover, TOD
would improve the accessibility of the city and save time and, at the same time, improve
automobile mobility and reduce congestion costs.
From the point of view of environmental benefit, the findings show that TOD would
help reduce environmental pollution by reducing the use of private vehicles. Most partici-
pants argued that TOD is needed to improve the city’s air quality. Increasing awareness
of TOD-related environmental considerations is important, as it would help discourage
people from using private vehicles. These findings show that investing in TOD would
provide the administration of Riyadh City with an opportunity to change their current
system of transportation and to reduce the consumption of energy, which ultimately helps
in creating an environmentally friendly city. Another study by Li et al. (2019) found that
transit-oriented development is linked with environmental benefits [30]. It can be stated
here that the more efficient the TOD in the Riyadh region, the more environmental benefits
can be gained for the city, such as reducing pollution, enhancing air quality, and reducing
congestion. Each of these benefits was found to be very important in the sustainable
development of Riyadh City. Based on these findings, it is recommended that policymakers
make strong policies so that the city can achieve environmental benefits and enhance the
air quality with the implementation of TOD. The country is looking forward to diversifying
its operations from an oil-oriented economy to a tourism-friendly economy and achieving
the objective of environmental benefits.
Another important finding of this study is that social benefits are expected to increase
for Riyadh City due to the implementation of TOD. Similar results were found in a study
by Pendall et al. (2012), in which researchers linked transit-oriented development with
social benefits and found that the more efficient the TOD, the more social benefits could
be increased for the city [31]. Similar findings were found in another study by Higgins
and Kanaroglou (2018), which found that TOD provides more efficient and faster trips by
reducing travel time and allowing people to have an active lifestyle [32]. These findings
imply that TOD is also important for the social well-being of people in Riyadh City, as it
can help provide its citizens with all the fundamental rights. Based on the findings and
previous studies conducted in the same domain, it is recommended that policymakers
consider the concept of TOD in their region to bring more viability to their city, as this
outcome would help achieve the 2030 vision.
6. Conclusions
This study aimed to evaluate the importance of transit-oriented development for
the city of Riyadh, KSA. A mixed-study research was carried out. TOD is essential to
strengthening Riyadh’s social, environmental, and economic well-being. Regarding social
benefits, TOD would help provide more mobility options for those without a car, the
elderly, and the young. In terms of environmental benefits, TOD would improve the urban
design quality and increase the urban landscape’s aesthetic beauty. From an economic
point of view, TOD would provide accessibility to alternative transport means that would
increase the volume in terms of the mobility of people by a single system. This study’s
outcome provides useful insight into the benefits of TOD. There is a need to incorporate
the combined action of various stakeholders to achieve the 2030 vision of a sustainable
environment. To achieve significant transport development in Riyadh City, government
Sustainability 2022, 14, 16129 9 of 10
authorities must show political commitment and form a comprehensive policy to integrate
TOD into the urban transport system.
References
1. Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. New urban models for more sustainable, liveable and healthier cities post covid19; reducing air pollution,
noise and heat island effects and increasing green space and physical activity. Environ. Int. 2021, 157, 106850. [CrossRef]
2. Qi, F.; Abu-Rumman, A.; Al Shraah, A.; Muda, I.; Huerta-Soto, R.; Hai Yen, T.T.; Abdul-Samad, Z.; Michel, M. Moving a step
closer towards environmental sustainability in Asian countries: Focusing on real income, urbanization, transport infrastructure,
and research and development. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2022, 1–20. [CrossRef]
3. Albuquerque, F.D.; Maraqa, M.A.; Chowdhury, R.; Mauga, T.; Alzard, M. Greenhouse gas emissions associated with road
transport projects: Current status, benchmarking, and assessment tools. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 48, 2018–2030. [CrossRef]
4. Alajmi, R.G. Factors that impact greenhouse gas emissions in Saudi Arabia: Decomposition analysis using LMDI. Energy Policy
2021, 156, 112454. [CrossRef]
5. Khan, A.; Bibi, S.; Ardito, L.; Lyu, J.; Hayat, H.; Arif, A.M. Revisiting the dynamics of tourism, economic growth, and environmental
pollutants in the emerging economies—Sustainable tourism policy implications. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2533. [CrossRef]
6. Papagiannakis, A.; Yiannakou, A. Do Citizens Understand the Benefits of Transit-Oriented Development? Exploring and Modeling
Community Perceptions of a Metro Line under Construction in Thessaloniki, Greece. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7043. [CrossRef]
7. Abubakar, I.R.; Dano, U.L. Sustainable urban planning strategies for mitigating climate change in Saudi Arabia. Environ. Dev.
Sustain. 2020, 22, 5129–5152. [CrossRef]
8. Rahman, M.M.; Hasan, M.A.; Shafiullah, M.; Rahman, M.S.; Arifuzzaman, M.; Islam, M.K.; Islam, M.M.; Rahman, S.M. A Critical,
Temporal Analysis of Saudi Arabia’s Initiatives for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction in the Energy Sector. Sustainability 2022,
14, 12651. [CrossRef]
9. Oakil, A.T.; Anwar, A.M.; Alhussaini, A.; Al Hosain, N.; Muhsen, A.; Arora, A. Urban transport energy demand model for Riyadh:
Methodology and a preliminary analysis. Urban Plan. Transp. Res. 2022, 10, 253–273. [CrossRef]
10. Carlton, I. Transit planners’ transit-oriented development-related practices and theories. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2019, 39, 508–519.
[CrossRef]
11. Zhang, M. A Chinese approach to “transit oriented development” (TOD). In Handbook on Transport and Urban Transformation in
China; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2020; pp. 116–130.
12. Knowles, R.D.; Ferbrache, F. Introduction to Transit Oriented Development and Sustainable Cities: Economics, Community and
Methods. In Transit Oriented Development and Sustainable Cities; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2019; pp. 1–10.
13. Wogan, D.; Carey, E.; Cooke, D. Policy Pathways to Meet Saudi Arabia’s Contribution to the Paris Agreement; King Abdullah Petroleum
Studies and Research Center (KAPSARC): Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2019.
14. Hamieh, A.; Rowaihy, F.; Al-Juaied, M.; Abo-Khatwa, A.N.; Afifi, A.M.; Hoteit, H. Quantification and analysis of CO2 footprint
from industrial facilities in Saudi Arabia. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2022, 16, 100299. [CrossRef]
15. Noland, R.B.; Weiner, M.D.; DiPetrillo, S.; Kay, A.I. Attitudes towards transit-oriented development: Resident experiences and
professional perspectives. J. Transp. Geogr. 2017, 60, 130–140. [CrossRef]
16. Papa, E.; Bertolini, L. Accessibility and transit-oriented development in European metropolitan areas. J. Transp. Geogr. 2015, 47, 70–83.
[CrossRef]
17. Wey, W.-M.; Chiu, Y.-H. Assessing the walkability of pedestrian environment under the transit-oriented development. Habitat Int.
2013, 38, 106–118. [CrossRef]
18. Renne, J.L. Evaluating transit-oriented development using a sustainability framework: Lessons from Perth’s network city. In
Planning Sustainable Communities: Diversity of Approaches and Implementation Challenges; Tsenkova, S., Ed.; University of Calgary:
Calgary, AB, Canada, 2009; pp. 115–148.
19. Zandiatashbar, A.; Hamidi, S.; Foster, N.; Park, K. The missing link between place and productivity? The impact of transit-oriented
development on the knowledge and creative economy. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2019, 39, 429–441. [CrossRef]
20. Cervero, R.; Murakami, J. Rail and property development in Hong Kong: Experiences and extensions. Urban Stud. 2009, 46,
2019–2043. [CrossRef]
21. Langlois, M.; Wasfi, R.A.; Ross, N.A.; El-Geneidy, A.M. Can transit-oriented developments help achieve the recommended weekly
level of physical activity? J. Transp. Health 2016, 3, 181–190. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2022, 14, 16129 10 of 10
22. Frank, L.D.; Fox, E.H.; Ulmer, J.M.; Chapman, J.E.; Braun, L.M. Quantifying the health benefits of transit-oriented development:
Creation and application of the San Diego Public Health Assessment Model (SD-PHAM). Transp. Policy 2022, 115, 14–26. [CrossRef]
23. Durand, C.P.; Andalib, M.; Dunton, G.F.; Wolch, J.; Pentz, M.A. A systematic review of built environment factors related to
physical activity and obesity risk: Implications for smart growth urban planning. Obes. Rev. 2011, 12, e173–e182. [CrossRef]
24. Litman, T. Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2015.
25. Litman, T. Evaluating Public Transportation Health Benefits; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2012.
26. Nesmachnow, S.; Hipogrosso, S. Transit oriented development analysis of Parque Rodó neighborhood, Montevideo, Uruguay.
World Dev. Sustain. 2022, 1, 100017. [CrossRef]
27. Dutta, U.; Consortium, M.N.T.R. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in Metro Detroit; Mineta National Transit Research Consor-
tium: Detroit, MI, USA, 2014.
28. Semeraro, L. Approaches to Transit Oriented Development: How Existing Infrastructure Can Lend Itself to Implementation of Transit
Oriented Development Techniques; Columbia University: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
29. Mudigonda, S.; Ozbay, K.; Ozturk, O.; Iyer, S.; Noland, R.B. Quantifying transportation benefits of transit-oriented development
in New Jersey. Transp. Res. Rec. 2014, 2417, 111–120. [CrossRef]
30. Li, Z.; Han, Z.; Xin, J.; Luo, X.; Su, S.; Weng, M. Transit oriented development among metro station areas in Shanghai, China:
Variations, typology, optimization and implications for land use planning. Land Use Policy 2019, 82, 269–282. [CrossRef]
31. Pendall, R.; Gainsborough, J.; Lowe, K.; Nguyen, M. Bringing equity to transit-oriented development: Stations, systems, and
regional resilience. Build. Resilient Reg. Urban Reg. Policy Its Eff. 2012, 4, 148–192.
32. Higgins, C.; Kanaroglou, P. Rapid transit, transit-oriented development, and the contextual sensitivity of land value uplift in
Toronto. Urban Stud. 2018, 55, 2197–2225. [CrossRef]