CPC Complete Notes
CPC Complete Notes
MODULE-I.................................................................................................................................................. 6
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 6
MODULE 2................................................................................................................................................ 12
Page | 2
MODULE 3................................................................................................................................................ 19
Page | 3
Summon, Mode of Service (Section 27-29, Order. V) ........................................................................... 32
Appearance of Parties, Examination, Production of Documents, Admission. (Section 30, Order. IX-XIII)
................................................................................................................................................................ 37
Powers of the Court for Discovery and Evidence (Section 30) .......................................................... 40
MODULE 6................................................................................................................................................ 46
Page | 4
Affidavits (Order. XIX) .......................................................................................................................... 53
MODULE 7................................................................................................................................................ 55
Compensatory Costs for False or Vexatious Claims or Defenses (Section 35A) ............................... 56
Page | 5
MODULE-I
Introduction
Definitions: Decree, Decree Holder, Foreign Judgment, Foreign Court, Judgment, Judgment
Debtor, Mesne Profit, Legal Representative, Order etc. (Section 2)
Suits of Civil Nature (Section 9)
Res sub judice (Section 10)
Introduction
The Civil Procedure Code was passed in 1908 and came into force on 1st January 1909. The Civil Procedure
Code neither creates nor takes away any right. It is intended to regulate the procedures followed by the civil
court. Laws can be divided into two groups –
1. Substantive law
2. Adjective or Procedural Law
The Preamble of the Code states that it was enacted to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the
procedure to be followed in the civil courts having civil jurisdiction in India. The main reason why some
parts of the law are codified is that the law should be ascertained from the language used in the enactment
and not from the preceding act.
In Prem Lal Nahata v. Chandi Prasad Sikaria, the court observed that the CPC deals with substantive rights
but mainly aims to consolidate the law relating to civil courts and procedures.
The Civil Procedure Code was passed in 1908 and came into force on 1st January 1909. The Code is
applicable to the whole country.
The main object of this civil procedure code is to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the procedures
of the Court of Civil Judicature. It collects all the laws that should be adopted by the civil courts. The main
aim of the CPC is to facilitate justice and seek an end to the litigation rather than provide any form of
punishment and penalties.
Page | 6
Definitions (Section 2)
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Key Definitions (Only key elements are pointed out here, please read it
with Bare Act)
Decree (sub-section 2)
Types
1. Preliminary decree: When further proceedings are needed
2. Final decree: Completely disposes of the suit
3. Partly preliminary and partly final
Decree-holder (sub-section 3)
India (sub-section 9)
Territory of India excluding the State of Jammu and Kashmir (with some exceptions)
Page | 7
Judge (sub-section 10)
Profits received or could have been received with ordinary diligence from wrongfully possessed
property
Includes interest on such profits
Excludes profits due to improvements made by the wrongful possessor
Includes various categories of officials such as: a) Judges b) Members of All-India Services c)
Commissioned or gazetted military, naval, or air force officers serving under the Government d) Court
Page | 8
officers with specific duties e) Officers empowered to keep persons in confinement f) Government officers
responsible for preventing offences, bringing offenders to justice, or protecting public interests g) Officers
handling government property, finances, or documents h) Officers in government service or paid by the
government for public duties
These definitions provide a foundation for understanding the terminology used in the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908, and are crucial for interpreting and applying the law correctly.
General Rule:
~ Civil Courts have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature.
~ This jurisdiction is subject to the provisions contained in the Code of Civil Procedure.
Exception:
~ Civil Courts cannot try suits where their cognizance is expressly or impliedly barred by law.
1. The section establishes a broad jurisdiction for civil courts, allowing them to hear all civil matters
unless specifically prohibited.
2. It clarifies that disputes over religious offices or property rights related to religious matters fall
under civil jurisdiction, despite their religious nature.
3. The section aims to provide a clear distinction between civil and other types of cases, ensuring that
matters of a civil nature have a proper forum for resolution.
Page | 9
4. The explanations help to prevent confusion in cases where religious and civil matters might overlap,
ensuring that important property and office disputes can be heard in civil courts regardless of their
religious connections.
This section is fundamental in defining the scope of civil courts' jurisdiction in India, providing a basis for
determining which cases can be brought before these courts.
General Rule:
~ A court must stay (not proceed with) a suit if: a) The matter in issue is directly and substantially
in issue in a previously instituted suit. b) The previously instituted suit is between the same
parties or their representatives. c) The parties are litigating under the same title.
1. Purpose: This section aims to prevent multiple proceedings on the same issue between the same
parties, avoiding conflicting judgments and unnecessary litigation.
2. "Directly and substantially in issue": The issues in both suits must be significantly similar, not
merely incidental or tangentially related.
3. "Same parties": Includes not just identical parties but also those claiming through them or
litigating under the same title.
4. Discretionary power: While the language uses "shall," courts have interpreted this as a
discretionary power to be exercised judiciously.
Page | 10
5. Burden of proof: The party seeking a stay must prove that the conditions of Section 10 are
satisfied.
6. Foreign courts: The explanation clarifies that suits pending in foreign courts (other than those
established by the Central Government) do not bar Indian courts from hearing similar cases.
7. Application: This section applies to suits, not to other proceedings like execution proceedings or
arbitrations.
8. Stage of application: The plea for stay can be raised at any stage of the suit, but preferably at the
earliest opportunity.
This section is crucial in managing parallel litigation and ensuring judicial economy by preventing multiple
courts from simultaneously deciding the same issues between the same parties.
Page | 11
MODULE 2
Doctrine of Res judicata (Section 11)
Comparison between Section 10 & Section 11
Foreign Judgment and Presumption as to Foreign Judgment (Section 13&14)
Res judicata and estoppel are legal principles in the Indian legal system, which serve to prevent repetitive
litigation and ensure fairness and consistency in judicial proceedings.
Res judicata, governed by Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is a doctrine that prohibits a
court from re-examining a case that has already been conclusively decided by the same court, involving the
same parties, subject matter, and under the same title.
In simple terms, if a matter has been previously adjudicated and a final judgment has been delivered on it,
it cannot be re-litigated. This post seeks to examine the various nuances and the multiple issues circling this
principle.
The doctrine of Res Judicata serves several important objectives in the legal system. These objectives are
based on three underlying maxims:
1. Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa: This Latin proverb means “no man should be
vexed twice for the same cause”. The basic goal of Res Judicata is to save the parties from having
to go through endless litigation over the same problem. Once an issue has been determined
definitively by a competent court, the same parties should not be permitted to re-litigate the same
dispute.
2. Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium: This Latin maxim means “it is in the best interests of the
State to put an end to litigation”. The Res Judicata concept enhances judicial efficiency and the
finality of rulings. It guarantees that disagreements are settled definitively, lowering the pressure
on the legal system and eliminating unnecessary and time-consuming litigation.
3. Res judicata pro veritate occipitur: This Latin proverb translates as “a matter adjudged is
accepted as correct”. Res Judicata creates a presumption of validity and finality for decisions made
Page | 12
by competent courts. The court’s judgements are said to be founded on a thorough assessment of
the facts and law, and they should not be readily reversed
Main Principle
A court shall not try any suit or issue where the matter has been directly and substantially in issue in a
former suit between the same parties (or their representatives), litigating under the same title, in a competent
court, and has been heard and finally decided by that court.
Key Elements
1. Same matter: Directly and substantially in issue
4. Competent court
Explanations
1. "Former suit":
2. Competence of Court:
o Must have been alleged by one party and denied or admitted by the other
o Includes matters that could and should have been raised as grounds of defense or attack in
the former suit
o Any relief claimed but not expressly granted is deemed to have been refused
Page | 13
6. Representative suits:
o In cases of public rights or private rights claimed in common, all interested persons are
deemed to claim under the litigating parties
1. Purpose: To prevent multiple litigations on the same issue and ensure finality of judgments
4. Constructive Res Judicata: Extends to matters that should have been raised in the former suit
5. Representative Actions: Decisions in public interest or common right cases bind all interested
parties
7. Limited Jurisdiction: Even decisions by courts with limited jurisdiction can have res judicata effect
on specific issues
This section is crucial in preventing repetitive litigation, ensuring judicial economy, and maintaining the
sanctity of judicial decisions. It requires careful analysis of previous litigation to determine if a new suit or
issue is barred by res judicata.
In essence, Section 10 deals with the management of concurrent litigation, while Section 11 deals with the
effects of concluded litigation on subsequent cases. Both serve to promote judicial economy and
consistency, but at different stages of the litigation process.
Page | 14
Basis Section 10- Res sub judice Section 11- Res judicata
Timing and Stage of Applies to ongoing, concurrent Applies after a suit has been decided. It
Proceedings proceedings. It deals with a deals with a former suit that has already
previously instituted suit that is still been heard and finally decided.
pending.
Court Action Requires the court to stay (pause) the Prohibits the court from trying the
later suit. subsequent suit or issue.
Finality of Decision No final decision is required in the Requires that the matter has been heard
previous suit. and finally decided in the former suit.
Scope of Application Applies only to suits pending in Applies to all competent courts,
Indian courts or certain foreign regardless of their location.
courts established by the Central
Government.
Foreign Court Explicitly states that pendency of a No such exception; if a foreign court's
Exception suit in a foreign court doesn't decision meets the criteria, it can have
preclude Indian courts from trying res judicata effect.
the same matter.
Nature of Bar Creates a temporary bar (stay) on the Creates a permanent bar on re-litigation
proceedings. of the decided issues.
Constructive Doesn't have a concept similar to Includes the concept of constructive res
Application constructive res judicata. judicata, barring matters that could and
should have been raised in the former
suit.
Discretion of the Courts have some discretion in Courts have less discretion; if all
Court applying the stay. conditions are met, they must apply res
judicata.
Page | 15
Purpose Aims to prevent parallel proceedings Aims to prevent re-litigation of decided
and potentially conflicting matters, ensuring finality of judgments.
decisions.
Main Principle:
A foreign judgment is generally conclusive on matters directly adjudicated between the same parties or
their representatives. However, there are exceptions where a foreign judgment will not be considered
conclusive.
Exceptions:
A foreign judgment is not conclusive if:
1. Lack of Jurisdiction:
2. Not on Merits:
o The judgment refuses to recognize Indian law in cases where it should apply.
o The proceedings in which the judgment was obtained violate principles of natural justice.
5. Obtained by Fraud:
Page | 16
6. Breach of Indian Law:
o The judgment sustains a claim founded on a breach of any law in force in India.
Key Points
These exceptions protect against enforcement of foreign judgments that may be unjust or contrary
to Indian legal principles.
The burden of proving these exceptions generally lies on the party challenging the foreign
judgment.
Main Principle:
There is a presumption of validity for foreign judgments, but this presumption can be challenged.
Key Points:
1. Initial Presumption:
2. Exception on Record:
o This presumption applies unless the contrary appears on the record itself.
4. Burden of Proof:
o The burden of proving lack of jurisdiction lies on the party challenging the foreign
judgment.
Important Considerations:
This section creates a rebuttable presumption in favor of the validity of foreign judgments.
It simplifies the process of recognizing foreign judgments by not requiring proof of jurisdiction in
every case.
However, it still allows for challenges to jurisdiction when there are grounds to do so.
Page | 17
Relationship between Sections 13 and 14
Section 13 outlines when a foreign judgment is not conclusive, including lack of jurisdiction.
Together, these sections balance the recognition of foreign judgments with the need to ensure their
validity and fairness under Indian law.
These sections are crucial in determining the enforceability of foreign judgments in India, providing both a
framework for acceptance and grounds for challenge when necessary.
Page | 18
MODULE 3
Place of Suing (Section 15 To 20)
Objection to Place of Suing (Section 21 And 21-A)
Transfer of Suits (Section 22 To 25)
Every suit must be filed in the court of the lowest grade competent to try it.
Suits concerning immovable property (for recovery, partition, foreclosure, rights, compensation)
should be filed in the court where the property is located.
Exception: If relief can be obtained through personal obedience of the defendant, the suit can also
be filed where the defendant resides or works.
If the property is in different jurisdictions, the suit can be filed in any court where a portion of the
property is located.
The chosen court must be competent to handle the entire claim value.
If the jurisdiction is uncertain, any competent court can record this uncertainty and proceed with
the case.
Appellate courts should not allow objections to jurisdiction unless there was no reasonable ground
for uncertainty at the time of filing.
Can be filed either where the wrong was done or where the defendant resides/works.
Page | 19
Section 20: General Rule for Other Suits
Other suits Suits can be filed where: a) The defendant(s) reside or work. b) Any defendant resides
or works (with court permission or other defendants' agreement). c) The cause of action wholly or
partly arises..
A corporation is deemed to carry on business at its principal office in India or at a subordinate
office if the cause of action arises there.
These sections provide the framework for determining the appropriate court for filing various types of civil
suits, balancing convenience for parties with the principle of natural justice.
No suit can be filed to challenge the validity of a decree passed in a former suit on grounds related
to the place of suing.
This applies when: i) The parties in both suits are the same, or ii) The parties are claiming under
the same title as in the former suit.
Page | 20
Explanation:
"Former suit" refers to a suit that has been decided before the decision in the current suit where the
decree's validity is being questioned.
The order of filing the suits doesn't matter; what matters is the order of decisions.
1. Objections to jurisdiction (place of suing, pecuniary limits, or local limits) must be raised at the
earliest opportunity in the original court.
2. Such objections cannot be entertained by higher courts unless there has been a failure of justice.
3. Once a decree has been passed, its validity cannot be challenged in a separate suit on grounds
related to the place of suing.
These provisions aim to prevent parties from raising jurisdictional issues at later stages of legal proceedings
or in separate suits, thereby promoting efficiency and finality in the legal process.
Requirements: a) Notice must be given to other parties b) Application must be made at the earliest
opportunity c) In cases with settled issues, application must be made before or during settlement
The court will consider objections from other parties before deciding which court should handle
the case
When courts are under the same Appellate Court- Apply to the Appellate Court
When courts are under different Appellate Courts but the same High Court- Apply to that High
Court
When courts are under different High Courts- Apply to the High Court with jurisdiction over the
court where the suit was filed
Page | 21
General Power of Transfer and Withdrawal (Section 24)
High Court or District Court can: a) Transfer cases to subordinate courts b) Withdraw cases from
subordinate courts
Options after withdrawal: a) Try the case itself b) Transfer to another subordinate court c) Return
to the original court
The new court can either retry the case or continue from where it was transferred
Additional notes: a) Additional and Assistant Judges' Courts are considered subordinate to District
Court b) "Proceeding" includes execution of decrees or orders c) For transferred small causes suits,
the new court is considered a Small Causes Court d) Cases can be transferred even from courts
lacking jurisdiction
Process:
The receiving court can retry or continue from the transfer point
If the application is dismissed as frivolous or vexatious, the Supreme Court may order
compensation (up to 2000 rupees) to the opposing party
3. Higher courts have broad powers to transfer or withdraw cases from lower courts
Page | 22
4. The Supreme Court can transfer cases between states if it serves justice
These provisions aim to ensure that cases are heard in the most appropriate court, allowing for flexibility
in the legal system while maintaining consistency in the application of law.
Page | 23
MODULE 4 & 5
Parties to Suit (Order. I)
Framing of Suits (Order. II)
Institution of Suit (Section 26, Order. IV)
Pleading (Order. VI)
Plaint (Order. VII)
Summon, Mode of Service (Section 27-29, Order. V)
Written Statement (Order. VIII)
Appearance of Parties, Examination, Production of Documents, Admission. (Section 30, Order. IX-
XIII)
Joinder of Plaintiffs
Multiple persons can be joined as plaintiffs in a single suit if:
a) They have a right to relief arising from the same act or transaction
b) Their separate suits would involve common questions of law or fact
The court can order separate trials if joinder may cause embarrassment or delay
Joinder of Defendants
Multiple persons can be joined as defendants in a single suit if:
a) Relief is sought against them arising from the same act or transaction
b) Separate suits against them would involve common questions of law or fact
The court can order separate trials if joinder may cause embarrassment or delay
The court can give judgment against one or more defendants according to their liability
Not every defendant needs to be interested in all the relief claimed in the suit
Page | 24
Flexible Joinder Rules
Plaintiffs can join multiple parties liable on the same contract in a single suit
When unsure about the responsible party, plaintiffs can join multiple defendants to determine
liability
Representative Suits
Where numerous persons have the same interest in a suit, one or more can represent all, the court
must give notice to all interested parties
Court's Powers
The court can permit interested persons or bodies to present opinions on legal questions
The court can request any pleader to address it regarding affected interests
The court can deal with the rights of parties actually before it
Procedural Aspects
The court can substitute plaintiffs in case of mistakes in naming the right plaintiff
When adding defendants, the plaint must be amended and served accordingly
Framing of Suits
Suits should be framed to allow for final decisions on disputed subjects
Page | 25
Inclusion of Whole Claim
A suit must include the entire claim related to the cause of action
When entitled to multiple reliefs, a plaintiff should sue for all, or risk losing the right to claim
omitted reliefs later
Multiple plaintiffs can join causes of action if they have joint interests against the same defendant(s)
The court's jurisdiction in such cases depends on the aggregate value of subject matters
Exceptions include: a) Claims for mesne profits or rent arrears b) Damages for breach of contract
related to the property c) Claims based on the same cause of action
Note: This doesn't prevent asking for possession in foreclosure or redemption suits
Exception: When personal claims arise from or are related to the estate they represent
Objections to Misjoinder
Objections to misjoinder of causes of action must be raised at the earliest opportunity
For cases with settled issues, objections must be raised before or during settlement
Page | 26
Institution of Suit (Section 26, Order. IV)
The law allows for other prescribed methods of instituting a suit, though presenting a plaint is the
most common.
This requirement ensures that the facts presented to the court are verified and sworn to be true.
This provision ensures consistency and standardization in the way affidavits are prepared and
presented to the court.
It can be presented to the court directly or to an officer appointed by the court for this purpose
The plaint must comply with the rules specified in Orders VI and VII of the Code of Civil Procedure
This register records the particulars of every suit filed in the court
The numbering follows the order in which plaints are admitted by the court
Page | 27
Pleading (Order. VI)
Definition of Pleading
Pleading means either a plaint or a written statement
Content of Pleadings
Must contain only material facts, not evidence
Forms of Pleading
Should follow forms in Appendix A when applicable
Conditions Precedent
Must be specifically mentioned if intended to be contested
Consistency in Pleadings
No new grounds or inconsistent facts allowed except through amendment
Denial of Contract
A bare denial is construed as denial of facts, not legality or sufficiency
Legal Presumptions
Need not be alleged unless specifically denied by the other party
Page | 28
Signing of Pleadings
Must be signed by the party and their pleader (if any)
Verification of Pleadings
Must be verified at the foot by the party or someone acquainted with the facts
Amendment of Pleadings
Court may allow amendments to determine real issues in controversy
The expression plaint has not been defined in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). It can be said to be
a statement of claim, a document by presentation of which the suit is instituted. Its object is to state the
grounds upon which the assistance of the court is sought by the plaintiff.
Rule 1 of Order IV lays down that a plaint is to be presented in duplicate to the Court or such officer
as may be appointed by the Court.
Every plaint shall comply with the rules contained in Orders VI and VII of CPC.
A suit is instituted when the plaint is presented and not when the suit is registered.
Page | 29
Statement if any party is a minor or of unsound mind
Relief claimed
Page | 30
Return of Plaint (Rule 10)
Court may return plaint to be filed in proper court
Undervaluation of relief
Documents not produced may not be admitted as evidence without court's permission
Rule 10B: Power of appellate Court to transfer suit to the proper Court
Rule 13: Rejection of plaint does not preclude presentation of fresh plaint
Page | 31
Summon, Mode of Service (Section 27-29, Order. V)
When a suit is properly filed, the court can issue a summons to the defendant.
The summons requires the defendant to appear and respond to the claim.
It must be served within 30 days from the date the suit was filed.
The method of sending must follow the rules of the receiving state.
After proceeding with the summons, the receiving court must return it to the original court.
o If the record is in a language other than Hindi or English, the translation should be in either
Hindi or English.
This section applies to summonses and processes issued by: a) Civil or Revenue Courts in parts of
India where the Code doesn't apply b) Civil or Revenue Courts established by the Central
Government outside India c) Other foreign Civil or Revenue Courts specified by the Central
Government
Page | 32
They are to be served as if they were summonses issued by the receiving courts.
The summons requires the defendant to appear, answer the claim, and file a written statement within
30 days of service.
If the defendant fails to file the written statement within 30 days, they may be allowed to file it later
(up to 120 days from service) with court permission and payment of costs.
After 120 days, the defendant forfeits the right to file a written statement.
a) In person
b) Through a pleader (lawyer) who can answer all material questions
c) With a pleader accompanied by someone who can answer all questions
Parties can only be ordered to appear in person if they reside within certain distance limits
Page | 33
Registered post with acknowledgment
If the defendant refuses or can't be found, the summons is affixed to the outer door of their residence
or place of business
The serving officer must endorse the manner and time of service
This includes affixing the summons in a conspicuous place in the court and the defendant's last
known residence
Special provisions for service in prisons, foreign countries, and on public officers
Page | 34
Service on Soldiers, Sailors, or Airmen (Rule 28)
Summons is sent to the commanding officer
If unable to file within 30 days, the court may allow up to 120 days from the date of service of
summons.
After 120 days, the defendant forfeits the right to file a written statement.
If a document is not in the defendant's possession, they must state whose possession it is in.
Documents not produced as required may not be accepted as evidence later without court
permission.
Defenses like fraud, limitation, release, payment, performance, or illegality must be specifically
pleaded.
For commercial cases, the defendant must state which allegations they deny, admit, or require proof
of.
Page | 35
Evasive denials are not allowed; the defendant must answer the substance of each allegation.
Set-off (Rule 6)
The defendant can claim a set-off for an ascertained sum of money recoverable from the plaintiff.
The set-off is treated like a cross-suit, allowing the court to give judgment on both the original
claim and the set-off.
The court can exclude a counter-claim if it believes it should be dealt with in a separate suit.
The court can require additional written statements from any party within 30 days.
Page | 36
The court cannot extend the time for filing a written statement beyond the limits set in Rule 1.
Exception: If the defendant appears despite this failure, the suit won't be dismissed.
If sufficient cause is shown, the court may set aside the dismissal and proceed with the suit.
Exceptions: If plaintiff shows best efforts to locate defendant, proves defendant is avoiding service,
or shows other sufficient cause.
If summons was served but not in time, the hearing will be postponed.
Page | 37
Late Appearance of Defendant (Rule 7)
If defendant appears late but shows good cause, they may be heard upon such terms as the court
directs.
If part of the claim is admitted, a decree will be passed for that part and the rest dismissed.
Plaintiff may apply to set aside dismissal if sufficient cause for non-appearance is shown.
The decree may be set aside on such terms as the court thinks fit.
A decree won't be set aside merely for irregularity in service if the defendant had notice and
sufficient time to appear.
Page | 38
Order X: Examination of Parties by the Court
The court will fix a date for appearance before the chosen forum or authority.
If conciliation fails, the matter is referred back to the court, and parties are directed to appear on a
fixed date.
At subsequent hearings: a) The court may orally examine parties present in person. b) The court
may examine persons accompanying parties who can answer material questions.
The court may ask questions suggested by either party during the examination.
If the party fails to appear without lawful excuse on the appointed day: a) The court may pronounce
judgment against them. b) The court may make any other appropriate order related to the suit.
Page | 39
These rules outline the court's power to examine parties and their companions, the procedure for recording
such examinations, and the consequences if a pleader is unable to answer material questions. The rules also
emphasize the importance of exploring alternative dispute resolution methods before proceeding with the
suit.
Section 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, outlines the court's powers to order discovery and manage
evidence. This section can be divided into three main parts:
Important Points:
1. The court can exercise these powers at any time during the proceedings.
2. The court can act on its own motion or upon the application of any party involved in the case.
3. These powers give the court significant control over the evidence-gathering process and help ensure
a fair trial.
Page | 40
These powers help the court gather all necessary information to make informed decisions and conduct a
fair trial.
The court decides which interrogatories are necessary within 7 days of application.
The court may refuse, adjourn, or make an order for discovery as it sees fit.
Affidavit of documents must specify which documents the party objects to produce.
The court can order production of documents at any time during the suit.
The party receiving notice must respond within 10 days, stating a time for inspection.
The court can make an order for inspection if the party fails to allow inspection.
Page | 41
For business books, the court may order verified copies instead of original documents.
A plaintiff whose suit is dismissed is precluded from bringing a fresh suit on the same cause of
action.
The court may require other parts of the answer to be put in if they are connected.
These rules outline the procedures for discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits, including the
use of interrogatories, production of documents, and consequences for non-compliance.
If a party refuses or neglects to admit a document after notice, they may have to pay the costs of
proving that document, regardless of the suit's outcome.
Page | 42
Costs for proving a document won't be allowed without such notice, unless the court finds that
omitting the notice saved expenses.
Rule 2A:
Documents are deemed admitted if not specifically denied after receiving notice.
If a party unreasonably refuses to admit a document, the court may order them to pay compensation
to the other party.
Rule 3: The notice to admit documents should follow Form No. 9 in Appendix C, with necessary variations.
Rule 3A: The court can, at any stage and on its own, ask a party to admit any document and record their
response.
If they refuse or neglect to admit, they may have to pay the costs of proving those facts.
Admissions made this way are only for the current suit.
Rule 5: Notices to admit facts should follow Form No. 10, and admissions of facts should follow Form
No. 11 in Appendix C.
Evidence of Admissions Rule 7: An affidavit by the pleader or their clerk about the signature on
admissions is sufficient evidence of those admissions.
Page | 43
Notice to Produce Documents Rule 8:
Notice to produce documents should follow Form No. 12 in Appendix C.
An affidavit by the pleader or their clerk about serving this notice is sufficient evidence of service.
These rules aim to streamline the legal process by encouraging parties to admit facts and documents,
reducing the need for formal proof and potentially speeding up proceedings.
o For public records or third-party books, the court may require copies.
Page | 44
Endorsements on Rejected Documents (Rule 6)
o Inadmissible documents are endorsed with suit details and rejection statement.
o In appealable cases, documents are returned after the appeal period or appeal disposal.
Application to Material Objects (Rule 11) :These rules apply to other material objects producible as
evidence.
Page | 45
MODULE 6
Framing of Issues (Order. XIV)
Hearing of Parties (Order. XV)
Summon to Witnesses (Section 31-32, Order. XVI)
Adjournment (Order. XVII)
Hearing of the Suit (Order. XVIII)
Affidavits (Order. XIX)
o Material propositions are facts or laws essential for a plaintiff's right to sue or a defendant's
defense.
o Court frames issues after reading pleadings, examining parties, and hearing arguments.
o For mixed issues of law and fact, court may try law issue first if it relates to: a) Court's
jurisdiction b) Legal bar to the suit
o Other issues may be postponed until after the law issue is determined.
Page | 46
o Allegations in pleadings or answers to interrogatories
o Court can strike out wrongly framed or introduced issues before passing decree.
o They can enter into a written agreement specifying outcomes based on court's finding, such
as: a) Payment of money b) Declaration of rights or liabilities c) Delivery of property d)
Performance or abstention from specific acts
o Court tries the issue and pronounces judgment according to the agreement.
Page | 47
Dealing with Multiple Defendants (Rule 2)
o If one defendant is not at issue with the plaintiff, the court may: a) Pronounce judgment for
or against that defendant immediately b) Continue the suit against other defendants
o Decree is drawn up based on this judgment and bears the date of judgment pronouncement
o Court can determine issues and pronounce judgment if findings are sufficient
o This applies whether summons was for issue settlement or final disposal
o For issue settlement summons, all parties/pleaders must be present and not object
o If findings are insufficient, court postpones hearing and sets date for further
evidence/arguments
o If a party fails to produce evidence without sufficient cause, the court may: a) Pronounce
judgment immediately, or b) Frame and record issues, then adjourn for necessary evidence
production
The provisions in sections 27, 28, and 29 (which likely deal with general summons procedures)
also apply to summons issued for:
a) Giving evidence
b) Producing documents
c) Producing other material objects
Page | 48
Section 32: Penalty for Default
This section gives the court power to compel attendance of a person summoned under section 30
(which likely deals with summoning witnesses).
These provisions demonstrate the serious consequences for failing to appear when summoned by the court
as a witness. They give the court significant powers to ensure compliance with its summons, ranging from
financial penalties to arrest and imprisonment.
Page | 49
Service of Summons (Rules 7A-9)
o Court may allow parties to serve summons
This order provides a comprehensive framework for summoning witnesses, ensuring their attendance, and
dealing with non-compliance in civil proceedings.
Page | 50
o No more than three adjournments can be granted to a party during the hearing
Costs of Adjournment
o Court must fix a day for further hearing
Continuity of Hearings
o Once started, hearings should continue day-to-day until all witnesses are examined
Restrictions on Adjournments
o Adjournments granted only for circumstances beyond a party's control
o Illness of pleader must be verified; party should have tried to engage another pleader
o If substantial evidence is already recorded, court may proceed as if the party were present
This Order aims to prevent unnecessary delays in legal proceedings by limiting adjournments and providing
guidelines for handling various scenarios of non-appearance or unpreparedness of parties.
Page | 51
o Defendant may begin if they admit facts but contest on legal grounds
Page | 52
Remarks on Witness Demeanor (Rule 12)
o Court may record remarks on witness demeanor
This Order provides a comprehensive framework for conducting hearings, examining witnesses, and
managing evidence in civil suits.
Page | 53
o Unnecessary hearsay or argumentative matter may incur costs
o Must state which statements are from personal knowledge vs. information/belief
Amendment to Rule 1
o Court may order attendance of witness for cross-examination if deemed necessary, even
after filing of affidavit
This Order provides detailed guidelines on the use of affidavits in civil proceedings, including their content,
format, and the court's power to control and regulate affidavit evidence. It also emphasizes the court's
discretion in managing affidavit evidence and ensures that parties have the opportunity for cross-
examination when necessary.
Page | 54
MODULE 7
Judgment and Decree (Section.33)
Interest (Section.34)
Costs (Section.33-35-B)
Note: A judgment is the court's reasoning and decision, while a decree is the formal expression of that
decision.
This section deals with the court's power to award interest in money decrees:
a) Pre-decree Interest:
The court may order interest on the principal sum from the date of the suit to the date of the decree.
This is in addition to any interest awarded for the period before the suit was filed.
b) Post-decree Interest:
The court may award further interest from the date of the decree to the date of payment.
For liabilities arising from commercial transactions, the post-decree interest rate may exceed 6%
per annum.
It cannot exceed the contractual interest rate or the rate at which nationalized banks lend for
commercial transactions (if no contractual rate exists).
d) Definitions:
Page | 55
"Nationalized bank" refers to corresponding new banks as defined in the Banking Companies Act,
1970.
If the decree is silent on post-decree interest, it's assumed the court has refused such interest.
a) Court's Discretion:
The court has discretion to determine costs, subject to prescribed conditions and limitations.
The court can decide who pays the costs, from what property, and to what extent.
Lack of jurisdiction to try the suit doesn't bar the court from exercising these powers.
If the court decides that costs should not follow the event (i.e., the losing party doesn't pay), it must
provide written reasons for this decision.
a) Applicability:
Applies to any suit or proceeding, including execution proceedings, but excluding appeals and
revisions.
Page | 56
c) Court's Power:
The court may order the party who made the false or vexatious claim/defense to pay compensatory
costs to the objector.
The court must record its reasons for holding the claim/defense false or vexatious.
Maximum amount: Rs. 3,000 or the court's pecuniary jurisdiction limit, whichever is less.
Special provision for Small Cause Courts with jurisdiction below Rs. 250.
High Court can empower or limit the amount awarded by lower courts.
e) Criminal Liability:
Payment of compensatory costs doesn't exempt the person from criminal liability for the false
claim/defense.
The compensatory costs awarded must be considered in any subsequent suit for damages related to
the same claim/defense.
b) Court's Power:
The court may order the party causing delay to pay costs to the other party.
The costs should be sufficient to reimburse the other party's expenses for attending court on that
date.
Payment of these costs is a condition for further prosecution of the suit (if plaintiff is ordered to
pay) or defense (if defendant is ordered to pay).
Page | 57
d) Separate Defenses:
If there are separate defenses by different defendants, payment of costs is a condition for further
prosecution of defense by the specific defendant(s) ordered to pay.
e) Treatment of Costs:
If paid, these costs are not included in the costs awarded in the final decree.
If unpaid, a separate executable order is drawn up specifying the amount and the persons liable to
pay.
These provisions aim to discourage false or vexatious litigation and unnecessary delays in court
proceedings, providing the court with tools to penalize such behavior and compensate the affected parties.
Page | 58