Name: Ardilyn K.
Villanueva
Subject: N203-Statistical Method in Nursing
ASSIGNEMENT NO. 1 (One-way ANOVA Test)
Determine the significant difference as to employment status in terms of:
1. Lifestyle
2. Social status
3. AIO
4. Attitude
One-Way ANOVA (Welch's)
F df1 df2 p
LIFESTYLE 3.545 2 12.0 0.062
SOCIAL STATUS 14.478 2 20.4 < .001
AIO 4.743 2 15.2 0.025
ATTITUDES 0.246 2 11.3 0.786
Group Descriptives
Employment Status N Mean SD SE
LIFESTYLE Employed 43 2.80 0.577 0.0879
Not Employed 5 2.60 0.374 0.1673
Student 52 2.51 0.459 0.0637
SOCIAL STATUS Employed 43 3.29 0.591 0.0901
Not Employed 5 2.60 0.200 0.0894
Student 52 2.91 0.640 0.0888
AIO Employed 43 3.29 0.515 0.0786
Not Employed 5 2.92 0.228 0.1020
Student 52 3.03 0.489 0.0678
ATTITUDES Employed 43 3.00 0.409 0.0624
Not Employed 5 2.96 0.434 0.1939
Student 52 3.06 0.473 0.0655
Tukey Post-Hoc Test – LIFESTYLE
Employed Not Employed Student
Employed Mean difference — 0.205 0.2970
Name: Ardilyn K. Villanueva
Subject: N203-Statistical Method in Nursing
Tukey Post-Hoc Test – LIFESTYLE
Employed Not Employed Student
p-value — 0.674 0.016
Not Employed Mean difference — 0.0923
p-value — 0.921
Student Mean difference —
p-value —
Tukey Post-Hoc Test – SOCIAL STATUS
Employed Not Employed Student
Employed Mean difference — 0.693 0.385
p-value — 0.046 0.008
Not Employed Mean difference — -0.308
p-value — 0.527
Student Mean difference —
p-value —
Tukey Post-Hoc Test – AIO
Employed Not Employed Student
Employed Mean difference — 0.368 0.258
p-value — 0.258 0.034
Not Employed Mean difference — -0.111
p-value — 0.881
Student Mean difference —
p-value —
Tukey Post-Hoc Test – ATTITUDES
Employed Not Employed Student
Employed Mean difference — 0.0400 -0.0577
p-value — 0.980 0.804
Not Employed Mean difference — -0.0977
p-value — 0.886
Name: Ardilyn K. Villanueva
Subject: N203-Statistical Method in Nursing
Tukey Post-Hoc Test – ATTITUDES
Employed Not Employed Student
Student Mean difference —
p-value —
A one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of employment status on
lifestyle, social status, activities, interests, and opinions and attitude scores from the
survey conducted on the respondents.
A one-way ANOVA revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in the
social status scores between at least two groups (F(2, 20.4) = 14.478, p = < .001) and
the activities, interests, and opinions scores between at least two groups (F(2, 15.2) =
4.743, p = 0.025)
Tukey’s HSD Test for multiple comparisons found that the mean value of the social
status scores was significantly different between students and employed individuals (p =
0.008) and the mean value of the activities, interests, and opinions scores was
significantly different between students and employed individuals (p = 0.034)
There were no statistically significant differences noted in the lifestyle scores (p = 0.062)
and the attitude scores (p = 0.786) among the respondents.