FVD 6 22AE Module5
FVD 6 22AE Module5
Mechanical and hydro-mechanical flight control systems are relatively heavy and
require careful routing of flight control cables through the aircraft by systems of
pulleys, cranks, tension cables, and hydraulic pipes.
Both systems often require redundant backups to deal with failures, which again
increases weight. Also, both have limited ability to compensate for changing
aerodynamic conditions. The term fly-by-wire implies a purely electrically-signaled
control system. However, it is used in the general sense of computer- configured
controls, where a computer system is interposed between the operator and the final
control actuators or surfaces. This modifies the manual inputs of the pilot in
accordance with control parameters.
Operation: When a pilot moves the control column (also referred to as sidestick or
joystick), a signal is sent to a computer through multiple wires or channels. The
computer receives the signals, which are then sent to the control surface actuator,
resulting in surface motion. Potentiometers in the actuator send a signal back to the
computer reporting the position of the actuator. When the actuator reaches the
desired position, the two signals (incoming and outgoing) cancel each other out and
the actuator stops moving.
Fly-by-wire control systems allow aircraft computers to perform tasks without pilot
input. Automatic stability systems operate in this way. Gyroscopes fitted with sensors
are mounted in an aircraft to sense movement changes in the pitch, roll, and yaw
axes. Any movement results in signals to the computer, which automatically moves
control actuators to stabilize the aircraft to nominal conditions.
Digital Fly-By-Wire:
A digital fly-by-wire flight control system is similar to its analog counterpart. However,
the signal processing is done by digital computers and the pilot literally can "fly-via-
computer". This also increases the flexibility of the flight control system, since the
digital computers can receive input from any aircraft sensor, e.g., altimeters and pitot
tube. This also increases the electronic stability, because the system is less
dependent on the values of critical electrical components in an analog controller. The
computers sense position and force inputs from pilot controls and aircraft sensors.
They solve differential equations to determine the appropriate command signals that
move the flight controls to execute the intentions of the pilot. The Airbus Industries
Airbus A320 became the first airliner to fly with an all-digital fly-by-wire control
system.
Main advantages:
Summing up, the main advantages of fly-by-wire systems are:
Decrease in weight, which results in fuel savings
Reduction in maintenance time (instead of adjusting the system, pieces are
simply changed by new ones, so that maintenance is made more agile)
Better response to air gusts, which results in more comfort for passengers
Automatic control of maneuvers (the systems avoid the pilot executing
maneuvers with exceed of force in the controls).
2.0 Landing Gear And Subsystem
2.1 Introduction
0f all of the many internal components that must be defined in an aircraft
configuration design layout, the landing gear will usually cause the most trouble.
The tires and shock strut must be just the right size, and if the plane gets heavier
than planned, they must get larger. The wheels must be properly located in the
down position for takeoff and landing, or the airplane might crash. If retractable,
the landing gear must somehow fold into the aircraft without chopping up the
structure, obliterating(destroy utterly; wipe out:) the fuel tanks, or bulging out into the
slipstream. The landing-gear design, as specified by Fig. 11.1
2.2 Landing-Gear Arrangements
The common options for landing-gear arrangement are shown in Fig. 11.2. The
single main gear is used for many sailplanes because of its simplicity. The wheel
can be forward of the center of gravity (c.g.), as shown here, or can be aft of the
c.g. with a skid under the cockpit.
Bicycle" gear has two main wheels, fore and aft of the c.g., with small "outrigger"
wheels on the wings to prevent the aircraft from tipping sideways. The bicycle
landing gear has the aft wheel so far behind the c.g. that the aircraft must take off
and land in a flat attitude, which limits this type of gear to aircraft with high lift at
low angles of attack (i.e., high-aspect-ratio wings with large camber and/or flaps).
Bicycle gear has been used mainly on aircraft with narrow fuselage and wide
wing span such as the B-47.
The "taildragger" landing gear has two main wheels forward of the c.g. and an
auxiliary wheel at the tail. Taildragger gear is also called "conventional" landing gear
because it was the most widely used arrangement during the first 40 years of
aviation, but today it is uncommon except on sport airplanes. Taildragger gear
provides more propeller clearance, has less drag and weight, and allows the wing to
generate more lift for rough-field operation than does tricycle gear. However,
taildragger landing gears inherently unstable. If the aircraft starts to turn, the location
of the c.g. behind the main gear causes the turn to get tighter until a "ground loop" is
encountered, and the aircraft either drags a wing tip, collapses the landing gear, or
runs off the side of the runway. To prevent this, the pilot of a taildragger aircraft must
align the aircraft almost perfectly with the runway at touchdown and "dance" on the
rudder pedals until the aircraft stops.
The most commonly used arrangement today is the "tricycle" gear, with two main
wheels aft of the c.g. and an auxiliary wheel forward of the c.g. With a tricycle
landing gear, the c.g. is ahead of the main wheels so that the aircraft is stable on the
ground and can be landed at a fairly large "crab" angle (i.e., nose not aligned with
the runway). Also, tricycle landing gear improves forward visibility on the ground and
permits a flat cabin floor for passenger and cargo loading.
Quadricycle gear is much like bicycle gear but with wheels at the sides of
the fuselage. Quadricycle gear also requires a flat takeoff and landing attitude.
It is used on the B-52 and several cargo planes where it has the advantage of
permitting a cargo floor very low to the ground.
Landing gear and its subsystems are crucial components of an aircraft, providing the
necessary support during takeoff, landing, and taxiing. Here's an overview of the
landing gear and its main subsystems:
1. Main Landing Gear (MLG):
Purpose: Provides the primary support for the aircraft's weight during landing
and taxiing.
Components:
o Struts: Hydraulic or pneumatic shock-absorbing elements.
o Wheels: Provide a rolling surface for the aircraft to move on the
ground.
o Brakes: Systems to decelerate the aircraft during landing or when
taxiing.
o Tires: They absorb loads and provide friction on the runway.
2. Nose Landing Gear (NLG):
Purpose: Supports the front of the aircraft and allows for steering on the
ground.
Components:
o Struts: Like the MLG but smaller and lighter.
o Wheel/Tire: Smaller in diameter than the MLG wheels.
o Steering Mechanism: Allows the pilot or ground crew to control the
direction of the aircraft on the ground.
3. Shock Absorber:
Purpose: To absorb the impact and forces during landing.
Components:
o Hydraulic or Pneumatic System: These systems are typically used in
modern landing gear to dampen the shock load.
o Damper: Helps control the extension and retraction speed of the
landing gear.
4. Retracting Mechanism:
Purpose: To stow the landing gear into the fuselage during flight to reduce
drag.
Components:
o Actuators: Hydraulic or electric systems used to retract and extend the
gear.
o Linkages: Mechanical components that connect and allow the
movement of the landing gear.
5. Braking System:
Purpose: To slow down or stop the aircraft after landing or during taxiing.
Components:
o Disc Brakes: Common in modern aircraft; used to generate friction
and slow down the wheels.
o Anti-skid System: Prevents the wheels from locking up, which can
cause loss of control.
o Brake Pedals: Controlled by the pilot to apply braking force to the
aircraft.
6. Steering System:
Purpose: Allows for controlled movement of the aircraft on the ground.
Components:
o Nose Wheel Steering: Controlled by the pilot through the rudder
pedals or a dedicated steering tiller.
o Differential Braking: Uses the brakes to steer the aircraft, particularly
when the nose gear does not provide enough steering.
7. Warning and Indication System:
Purpose: Alerts the pilot to the status of the landing gear.
Components:
o Landing Gear Indicators: Show the status of the gear (up, down, or in
transit).
o Warning Lights: Indicate issues such as the gear not being fully
extended, or any malfunction in the system.
8. Auxiliary Power and Control Systems:
Purpose: Support the landing gear's function, particularly in emergencies.
Components:
o Hydraulic Power Unit: Provides power for landing gear retraction and
extension.
o Emergency Extension System: Often powered by gravity or a
separate hydraulic system in case the primary system fails.
9. Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) / Anti-skid System:
Purpose: Prevents wheel lock-up during braking, which could cause a loss of
control, especially in adverse weather.
Components:
o Sensors: Monitor wheel speed to detect if a wheel is locking up.
o Control Unit: Adjusts brake pressure to ensure the wheels don't lock
up.
10. Fuselage and Structural Integration:
Purpose: Supports and houses the landing gear in the aircraft.
Components:
o Mounting Points: Where the landing gear attaches to the aircraft
structure.
o Doors: Close around the landing gear to streamline the aircraft during
flight.
Landing gear systems must be robust and reliable, as they endure heavy loads and
significant stress during operations. Their design and technology continue to evolve
to ensure greater efficiency, safety, and performance.
3.0 Propulsion and Fuel System Integration
3.1 Propulsion
3.1.1 Introduction
Gliders are fun, but they aren't very useful. Practical airplanes need thrust, and
providing that thrust has a large effect on the aircraft conceptual design layout.
Whatever the type, the engine will be one of the largest single items in weight and
size. Along with its associated hardware, the integration of the engine will drive the
configuration arrangement more than almost anything else.
In a piston-prop, these steps are done intermittently in the cylinders via the
reciprocating pistons.
In a turbine engine, these steps are done continuously, but in three distinct parts of
the engine.
3.1.3 Piston-Prop
Piston-prop engines have two advantages. They are cheap, and they have
the lowest fuel consumption at lower speeds. However, piston engines are
heavy and produce a lot of noise and vibration. Also, the propeller by its
very nature produces less and less thrust as velocity increases.
The piston-prop was the first form of aircraft propulsion. While experiments had been
made with electric motors and steam engines, the Wright Brothers and all the other
earlier aviation pioneers relied upon the gasoline internal combustion engine to make
power and a propeller to turn that power into thrust.
Actually, the propeller turns shaft power into thrust power, namely, the product of
thrust force and velocity. Because no propeller is perfect, some of that shaft power is
"lost" along the way, typically 20%. We define propeller efficiency as the thrust
power obtained divided by the engine power used, 80%. Thrust is then found as
power times prop efficiency, divided by velocity. typically
While the Wrights' engine wasn't very good, their propeller was amazing. They had
expected to apply ship propeller theory to the design of an airplane propeller but
discovered that there wasn't such a theory. So, they developed their own, a modified
strip theory not too different from one used today. This allowed them to design a
propeller that was twice as efficient as all others, with an efficiency of about 60%.
Twice the efficiency means twice the thrust per horsepower-a significant advantage!
3.1.4 Turbojet
The turbine engine consists of a compressor, a burner, and a turbine. These
separately perform the three functions of the reciprocating piston in a piston engine.
The compressor takes the air delivered by the inlet system and compresses it to
many times atmospheric pressure. This compressed air passes to the burner, where
fuel is injected and mixed with the air and the resulting mixture ignited.
The hot gases could be immediately expelled out of the rear to provide thrust but are
first passed through a turbine to extract enough mechanical power to drive the
compressor. It is interesting to note that one early jet engine used a separate piston
engine to drive the compressor.
There are two types of compressors. The centrifugal compressor relies upon
centrifugal force to "fling" the air into an increasingly narrow channel, which raises
the pressure. In contrast, an axial compressor relies upon blade aerodynamics to
force the air into an increasingly narrow channel. An axial compressor typically has
about six to ten stages, each of which consists of a rotor (i.e., rotating) disk of blades
and a stator (i.e., stationary) disk of blades. The rotors tend to swirl the air, so the
stators are used to remove the swirl.
For commercial aircraft, the turboprop fell out of favor with the dawn of the jet age
and the passengers' newfound expectation of transonic speeds. Recent
developments might bring them back. The "prop-fan" or "unducted fan" is essentially
a turboprop with an advanced aerodynamics propeller capable of near-sonic speeds.
These were successfully flight tested in the 1980s but did not find application, mostly
due to noise and the lingering perception that they were "just" propellers.
The latest variant called an "open rotor" has "propellers" that look and act more like
the fan rotors at the front of a turbofan engine. Indications are that an open rotor
engine will offer a 10-30% improvement in SFC compared to a turbofan, but suffer a
10-db increase in noise. Ongoing development work is addressing the issues of
weight, complexity, and noise. If successful, open rotor engines could be seen on the
next generation of new airliners.
For the turbofan engine, the mechanical power taken from the exhaust gases by a
turbine is applied to a ducted fan of one or more stages. This accelerates additional
air, which improves efficiency as described above. For most turbofans, the
accelerated fan air is split, with part of the air being "bypassed" around the engine to
exit unburned, while the rest is ducted into the main part of the engine for further
compression and burning. In effect, this acts like supercharging the "core," the
turbojet engine that resides inside every turbofan engine.
The key parameter for turbofan engines is the "bypass ratio," which is the mass-flow
ratio of the bypassed air, to the air that goes into the core of the engine. Bypass
ratios normally range from as high as 12 to as low as 0.25
(the so-called leaky turbojet).
Another benefit of the turbofan engine is noise reduction. The duct around the fan
suppresses its noise, and the reduced exit velocity of the fan air vs a pure turbojet
means that the noise-generating shear layers have reduced strength.
The turbofan engine offers better efficiency than a turbojet at subsonic speeds, but at
supersonic and higher speeds the drag of the fan increases so that the net benefit
reduces. Aircraft designed for efficient operation at speeds over Mach 2 are likely to
have pure turbojets.
3.1.6 Afterburner {Reheat}
The ideal turbine engine would inject enough fuel to completely combust all of the
compressed air, producing maximum thrust for a given engine size. Unfortunately,
this "stoichiometric" air/fuel mixture ratio of about 15 to 1 produces temperatures far
greater than the capabilities of known materials and would therefore burn up the
turbine blades.
To lower the temperature seen by the turbine blades, excess air is used. Currently
engines are limited to a turbine temperature of about 2000- 25000F {1100-1400°C},
which requires an air /fuel mixture ratio of about 60 to 1. Thus, only about a quarter
of the captured and compressed air is actually used for combustion. The exhaust is
75% unused hot air.
If fuel is injected into this largely un-combusted hot air, it will mix and burn. This will
raise the thrust as much as a factor of two and is known as "afterburning" ("reheat" in
the United Kingdom). Unfortunately, afterburning is inefficient in terms of fuel usage
because the burning is done at a lower pressure and the oxygen has already been
partially depleted. The fuel flow required to produce a pound of thrust in afterburner
is approximately double that used to produce a pound of thrust during normal engine
operations.
The choice between a piston-prop and a turboprop can depend upon several
additional factors. The turboprop uses more fuel than a piston prop of the same
power, but is substantially lighter and more reliable. Also, turboprops are usually
quieter. For these reasons turbine engines have largely replaced piston engines for
helicopters, business twins, and short-range commuter airplanes regardless of
design speed. However, piston-props are substantially cheaper and will likely remain
the default choice for light aircraft for a long time.
Electric propulsion is finally becoming practical although it is still far from competitive
with fuel-based propulsion due to the weight of the power supply. To date, electric
power has been applied mostly to propellers because they provide more thrust per
unit power, but electric fans are also in use.
There must be strong aircraft structure at the locations of the engine motor mounts.
These can be found on the engine company's installation drawing. For commercial
engines these are typically on the top, one toward the front, and one toward the
back. For military engines there are typically one on the top toward the front and one
on each side somewhere in the middle of the engine, or vice versa.
Figure 10.3 depicts a jet-engine installation including inlet ducts, a remotely mounted
nozzle (to better balance this particular design), control lines, fuel lines and fuel
system components, and various engine-driven accessories such as hydraulic
pumps and electrical generators. Note the clearance around the engine for cooling
airflow and the use of ring frame wing carrythrough structure.
3.1.8.1 Engine Dimensions
If the aircraft is designed using an existing, off-the-shelf engine, the dimensions are
obtained from the manufacturer. If a "rubber" engine is being used, the dimensions
for the engine must be obtained by scaling from some nominal engine size by
whatever scale factor is required to provide the desired thrust. The nominal engine
can be obtained by several methods.
In the major aircraft companies, designers can obtain estimated data for hypothetical
rubber engines from the engine companies. These data are presented for a nominal
engine size, and precise scaling laws are provided. Appendix E provides data for
several hypothetical advanced engines.
Another method for defining a nominal engine assumes that the new engine will be a
scaled version of an existing one, perhaps with some performance improvement due
to the use of newer technologies.
Figure 10.4 illustrates the dimensions that must be scaled from the nominal engine.
The scale factor SF is the ratio between the required thrust and the actual thrust of
the nominal engine. Equations (10.1-10.3) show how length, diameter, and weight
vary with the scale factor for the typical jet engine.
L = L actual (SF)0·4 (10.1)
D = D actual (SF)0.5 (10.2)
W = W actual (SF)1.1 (10.3)
Although statistically derived, these equations make intuitive(inherent) sense. Thrust
is roughly proportional to the mass flow of air used by the engine, which is related to
the cross-sectional area of the engine. Because area is proportional to the square of
the diameter, it follows that the diameter should be proportional to the square root of
the thrust scale-factor.
Note the engine-accessories package beneath the engine. The accessories include
fuel pumps, oil pumps, power-takeoff gearboxes, and engine control boxes. The
location and size of the accessory package vary widely for different types of engines.
In the absence of a drawing, the accessory package can be assumed to extend
below the engine to a radius of about 20-40% greater than the engine radius. On
some engines these accessories have been located in the compressor spinner or
other places.
However, the total pressure in the oncoming air must be maintained as it passes into
and through the inlet duct. As the air slows down and thus loses dynamic pressure,
its static pressure must go up accordingly so that the nozzle can use it to accelerate
the exhaust back to the aircraft's speed.
Thrust comes from an exhaust velocity greater than the aircraft speed. If total
pressure is lost by the inlet duct then engine power must be wasted to make up for it,
just to get the air back to its original speed. Roughly speaking, a 10% reduction in
inlet pressure recovery (total pressure delivered to the engine divided by freestream
total pressure) will reduce thrust by about 13%.
Thus, it is extremely important that the airflow into and inside the inlet duct be slowed
down in a manner that, as velocity is reduced, increases the static pressure. Slowing
down the air inside a duct by expanding the cross- sectional area of the duct is a
"good way" because it raises static pressure to hold total pressure constant. Slowing
down the air by skin friction along the sides is a "bad way" -the static pressure isn't
raised.
So, the installed performance of a jet engine greatly depends upon the design of the
air induction (inlet) system. The type and geometry of the inlet and inlet duct will
determine the pressure loss and distortion of the air supplied to the engine, which
will affect the installed thrust and fuel consumption. Also, the inlet's external
geometry including the cowl and boundary-layer diverter will influence the aircraft
drag.
There are four basic types of inlets, as shown in Fig. 10.5. The NACA flush inlet was
used by several early jet aircraft but is rarely seen today for aircraft propulsion
systems because of its poor pressure recovery. At the subsonic speeds for which the
NACA inlet is suitable, a pitot-type inlet will have virtually 100% pressure recovery is
about 90% for a well-designed NACA inlet. However, the NACA inlet tends to reduce
aircraft wetted area and weight if the engine is in the fuselage.
The capture area of an inlet is the cross-section area of the inlet front face,
measured in the flow direction to the front-most part of the lip. Capture area is pure
geometry, defined on the configuration layout. It is not the same as the freestream
cross-section area of the air that is captured by the engine because in subsonic flight
the flow spreads out as it approaches the inlet (Fig. 10.16).
Capture area is important. If it isn't correct, the engine might be starved for air
especially at low speeds, or it might have excessive aerodynamic drag. Not only
must capture area be sized to provide sufficient air to the engine at all aircraft
speeds, but for many aircraft the capture area must also provide "secondary air" for
cooling and environmental control and also provide for the boundary-layer air that is
bled off the inlet ramps and thrown overboard.
So, the initial design layout must include a good estimate of the capture area. The
actual calculations are described below and aren't too laborious, but a quick
statistical method gives a pretty good result. Figure 10.17 estimates the required
inlet capture area for subsonic and supersonic inlets, including appropriate amounts
of bleed and secondary airflows. This estimation is based upon the design Mach
number and the engine mass flow, normally obtained in the manufacturer's engine
data.
To determine the required capture area, the engine's mass flow is multiplied by the
value read from Fig. 10.17. If mass flow is not known, it can be estimated as 26
times the square of the engine front-face diameter in feet {127 times meters
squared}. If engine front face diameter is not known, it can be estimated as 80% of
maximum diameter.
As can be seen on the graph, the largest capture area is usually required at the
highest Mach number. Sometimes, though, takeoff requirements are even worse. If
so, consider using auxiliary suck-in (or blow-in) doors during takeoff.
A better method for calculating capture area for a subsonic inlet starts with the
geometry of Fig. 10.16. Note the capture area shown by dotted lines and the flow
streamlines expanding as they approach the inlet.
The aircraft's forebody builds up its own boundary layer. If this low-energy, turbulent
air is allowed to enter the engine, it will reduce engine performance and at
supersonic speeds and might even prevent proper inlet operation. Unless the
aircraft's inlets are very near the nose (within two to four inlet diameters), some form
of boundary-layer removal should be used just in front of the inlet.
The four major varieties of boundary-layer diverter are shown in Fig. 10.21.
The step diverter is suitable only for subsonic aircraft and relies upon the boundary
layer itself for operation. The boundary layer consists of low-energy air, compared to
the air outside of the boundary layer. The step diverter works by forcing the
boundary-layer air to either climb the step, pushing aside high-energy air outside the
boundary layer, or to follow the step, pushing aside other boundary-layer air that is of
lower energy. If the step diverter is properly shaped, the latter option prevails. The
step diverter should have an airfoil-like shape that is faired smoothly to the nacelle.
The diverter should extend about one inlet diameter forward of the inlet and should
have a depth equal to roughly 2-4% of the forebody length ahead of the inlet.
The boundary-layer bypass duct (simply a separate inlet duct) admits the
boundary-layer air and ducts it to an aft-facing hole. The internal duct shape should
expand roughly 30% from intake to exit to compensate for the internal friction losses.
The suction form of boundary-layer diverter is similar. The boundary layer air is
removed by suction through holes or slots just forward of the inlet and ducted to an
aft-facing hole. This type of diverter does not benefit from the ram impact of the
boundary-layer air and therefore does not work as well.
The channel diverter (Fig. 10.22) is the most common boundary-layer diverter for
supersonic aircraft. It provides the best performance and the least weight in most
cases. The inlet front face is located some distance away from the fuselage, with a
"splitter plate" to ensure that the boundary layer air does not get into the inlet. The
boundary-layer air is caught between the splitter plate and the fuselage and pushed
out of the resulting channel by the diverter ramps. The diverter ramps should have
an angle of no more than about 30 deg.
3.1.8.6 Nozzle Integration
The fundamental problem in jet-engine nozzle design is the mismatch in desired exit
areas at different speeds, altitudes, and thrust settings. The engine can be viewed as
a producer of high-pressure subsonic gases. The nozzle accelerates those gases to
the desired exit speed, which is controlled by the exit area.
The exit area to obtain a desired exhaust velocity depends upon the engine mass
flow (i.e., percent power). This is especially a problem with after burning engines in
which the desired exit area for supersonic afterburning operation can be three times
the desired area for subsonic, part-thrust operation.
Typical nozzles are shown in Fig. 10.23. In the past, the nozzle of a jet engine was
considered an integral part of the engine, to be installed on the aircraft without
question or change. This is still the case for subsonic commercial aircraft but is
changing for supersonic military aircraft due to the emergence of two-dimensional
and other advanced nozzles.
The fixed convergent nozzle: is almost universally used for subsonic commercial
turbojet and turbofan engines. The nozzle exit area is selected for cruise efficiency,
resulting in a slight loss of performance at lower speeds. However, the simplicity and
weight reduction of the fixed nozzle more than makes up for the performance loss in
most subsonic applications.
Translating Plug Nozzle: Another means to vary the exit area of a convergent
nozzle is the translating plug. This was used on the engine for the Me-262, the first
jet to be employed in combat in substantial numbers. The plug slides aft to decrease
exit area.
The ejector nozzle takes engine bypass air that has been used to cool the
afterburner and ejects it into the exhaust air, thus cooling the nozzle as well.
Generally speaking, the larger the propeller diameter, the more efficient the propeller
will be. The old rule of thumb was "keep it as long as possible." Countering this, an
overly long propeller will be heavy, will increase the loads on the motor mounts, and
might require longer landing gear. The main limitation on propeller diameter is the
propeller tip speed, which should be kept well below sonic speed.
The tip of a propeller follows a helical path through the air. Tip speed is the vector
sum of the rotational speed [Eq. (10.21)] and the aircraft's forward speed as defined
in Eq. (10.22):
[Watch the units! Rotation rate is normally given as revolutions per minute
(rpm) and must be converted to revolutions per second by dividing by 60.]
To avoid shocks on the tips during high-speed flight, the calculated tip speed should
be less than the critical Mach number of the propeller airfoil. This is approximated in
the following rule of thumb:
At sea level the helical tip speed of a metal propeller should not exceed 950
fps {290 m/s}.
A wooden propeller, which must be thicker, should be kept below 850 fps {260
m/s}.
If noise is of concern, the upper limit for metal or wood should be about 700
fps {213 m/s} during takeoff.
The appropriate speed limitation is factored into Eq. (10.22) and then Eq. (10.21) to
determine allowable diameter.
As forward velocity increases, the angle of attack seen by the blades of a fixed-pitch
propeller will decrease. This limits the thrust obtained at higher speeds. If the fixed
pitch is increased, the blades will tend to stall at low speeds, which reduces
low-speed thrust. A fixed-pitch propeller is called a "cruise prop" or "climb prop"
depending upon the flight regime the designer has decided to emphasize.
A variable-pitch propeller can be used to improve thrust across a broad speed range.
A controllable-pitch propeller has its pitch directly controlled by the pilot through a
lever alongside the throttle. A constant-speed propeller is automatically controlled in
pitch to maintain the engine at its optimal rpm.
The pusher location does have some advantages and has been used on a number
of more-recent designs. Most important, it can reduce aircraft skin-friction drag
because the pusher location allows the aircraft to fly in undisturbed air. With a tractor
propeller the aircraft flies in the turbulence from the propeller wake.
The pusher propeller reduces cabin noise because the engine exhaust is pointed
away from the cabin, and the windscreen is not buffeted by prop wash. The pusher
arrangement usually improves the pilot's outside vision, and reduces the very real
danger from fire, smoke, and C02.
However, the pusher configuration suffers several disadvantages. The propeller has
reduced efficiency because it is forced to work with disturbed airflow off the fuselage,
wing, and tails. It usually moves the center of gravity to the rear so the tails need to
be larger.
Most multi-engine aircraft have the engines out on the wings. This reduces wing
structural weight through a span-loading effect, and reduces fuselage drag by
removing the fuselage from the propeller wake. There are engine out controllability
problems that are usually solved by an increase in the size of the rudder and vertical
tail. t.
Upper-fuselage pods and tail-mounted pods are used mostly for seaplane and
amphibian designs. These need a huge clearance between the water and the
propeller (minimum of 18 in. {46 cm}, preferably one propeller diameter, but more is
even better. The high thrust line can cause undesirable control characteristics in
which application of power for an emergency go-around produces a nose-down
pitching moment. In fact, it may be difficult to raise the nose for takeoff if careful
calculations aren't performed during the design process.
Despite an old rule of thumb that says that the exit area should be 30% larger than
the intake area, recent analysis has shown that an exit area slightly smaller than the
intake is actually better. For preliminary layout this suggests designing to a ratio A exit/
Ainlet of 0.8 and providing adjustable cowl flaps that open to a ratio of 2 or more.
Adjustable cowl flaps let us change the exit area in flight, which changes the cooling
airflow. It is not necessary to vary the cooling intake area because the cooling airflow
always adjusts to the exit area. If you don't want the complexity of a variable exit, try
an exit that is 30% larger than the intake, then carefully reduce it during the flight-test
program while watching the cylinder head temperatures.
For tractor engines, the cooling-air intake is usually located directly in front of the
engine cylinders. The air is diverted over the top of the engine by "baffles," which are
flat sheets of metal that direct the airflow within the engine compartment. The air
then flows down through and around the cylinders into the area beneath the engine
and then exits through an aft-facing hole below the fuselage. This is referred to as
"downdraft" cooling.
Downdraft cooling exits the air beneath the fuselage, which is a high pressure area
and therefore a poor place to exit air. "Updraft" cooling flows the cooling air upward
through the cylinders and exits it into low-pressure air above the fuselage, creating
more efficient cooling flow due to a suction effect.
However, updraft cooling dumps hot air in front of the windscreen; this can heat up
the cabin. An engine oil leak can coat the windscreen with black oil. Aircraft engines
have the exhaust pipes below the cylinders, so updraft cooling causes the cooling air
to be heated by the exhaust pipes before reaching the cylinders.
For pusher engines, cooling is much more difficult. On the ground a front-mounted
propeller blows air into the cooling intakes. This is not the case for a pusher engine.
Also, the cooling-air intakes for a pusher engine are at the rear of the fuselage where
the boundary layer is thick and slow-moving. For these reasons most piston-pushers
use updraft cooling with a large scoop mounted below the fuselage. Internal fans are
sometimes needed to improve cooling on pusher configurations.
While these are all important during detail design, usually the tanks themselves are
the only components that affect the overall aircraft layout. For some aircraft like the
B-70 (Fig. 10.28), the fuel tanks define most of the internal volume of the aircraft. For
normal airplanes, the tanks usually consist of a "wet" wing box and perhaps a few
tanks in the fuselage. Their integration into the aircraft design is a major undertaking.
There are three types of fuel tanks: discrete, bladder, and integral. Discrete tanks are
fuel containers that are separately fabricated and mounted in the aircraft by bolts or
straps. Discrete tanks are normally used only for small general aviation and
homebuilt aircraft. They are often shaped like the front of an airfoil and placed at the
inboard wing leading edge, or are square-ish and placed in the fuselage directly
behind the engine and above the pilot's feet.
Bladder tanks are made by stuffing a shaped rubber bag into a cavity in the
structure. The rubber bag is thick, causing the loss of about 10% of the available fuel
volume. Despite this loss, bladder tanks are widely used for military aircraft because
they can be made self-sealing. If a bullet passes through a self-sealing tank, the
rubber will fill in the hole preventing a large fuel loss and fire hazard. This offers a
major improvement in aircraft survivability as approximately a third of combat losses
are attributed to hits in the fuel tanks.
Integral tanks are cavities within the airframe structure that are sealed to form a fuel
tank. Ideally, an integral tank would be created simply by sealing existing structure
such as wing boxes and cavities created between two fuselage bulkheads.
When designing the subsystems of an aircraft, safety constraints are a critical factor
to ensure the reliability, survivability, and protection of the passengers, crew, and
aircraft itself. These constraints focus on minimizing the risk of failure, addressing
potential hazards, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. Below are the
key safety constraints for various aircraft subsystems:
Fuel Leak Detection and Containment: Aircraft fuel systems must include
systems to detect fuel leaks quickly and safely contain the leaked fuel. Fuel
lines must be routed through protected areas, with barriers in place to prevent
ignition.
Fuel Tank Safety: To minimize the risk of fuel tank explosions or fires, fuel
tanks are equipped with inerting systems that reduce the likelihood of
combustion by flooding the tank with non-flammable gases (e.g., nitrogen).
Redundant Fuel Pumps: In case of failure of one pump, other pumps should
be able to supply fuel to the engines to prevent engine failure.
Pressure and Temperature Control: The ECS must ensure that the cabin
and cockpit remain at safe pressure and temperature levels throughout the
flight, especially at high altitudes where external conditions are extreme.
Air Quality: The system must provide clean, breathable air to prevent oxygen
depletion or contamination due to toxic fumes or carbon dioxide buildup.
Backup Systems: Redundancy in pressure and temperature control, along
with backup oxygen systems, is essential to ensure safety in case of failure.
Escape Routes: The cabin must be designed with sufficient exits and
evacuation routes that can be used quickly and effectively in the event of an
emergency. This includes emergency exits, escape slides, and clear signage.
Fire Suppression: The cabin must have fire detection and suppression
systems to minimize the risk of fire in-flight. Fire-resistant materials are often
used in the cabin.
Passenger Restraints: The seatbelts, oxygen masks, and other safety
systems must be designed to keep passengers safe during turbulence,
takeoff, landing, and emergencies.
FAA and EASA Standards: The design of all subsystems must comply with
the relevant aviation authority regulations, such as the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) or the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA),
to ensure the aircraft meets the highest safety standards.
Maintenance and Inspection: There should be clear maintenance protocols
and regular inspections to ensure the integrity of all subsystems, in
compliance with airworthiness directives.
1. Strength-to-Weight Ratio
The strength-to-weight ratio is one of the most critical criteria in aircraft design.
Aircraft must be strong enough to withstand aerodynamic forces, engine vibrations,
impacts, and landing loads, but they must also be as lightweight as possible to
maximize efficiency and fuel economy.
High Strength-to-Weight Materials: Aircraft materials must possess high
tensile and compressive strength while minimizing weight. Aluminum alloys,
titanium, and composite materials (such as carbon fiber-reinforced
polymers) are often used because they offer excellent strength-to-weight
ratios.
Trade-off between Strength and Weight: Designers must carefully balance
strength and weight.
For example, while titanium is very strong, it is heavier than aluminum, so its
use is generally limited to specific high-stress areas like engine components
and landing gear.