A

Mini Project
On

"Organizational Structure Analysis"

Submitted By
Mr. Jadhav Krishna Sanjay (PRN No- 2124PMBM1083)

For the requirement of Course 103-Basics of

Marketing,
Formative Assessment No. 1
Batch 2024-26

Under the Guidance

Prof. Harshada Jadhav

Submitted to

Dept. of MBA
School of Commerce & Management,
 Organizational Structure Analysis

Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1 Overview of McKinsey
1.2 Overview of Ford Motor Company
1.3 Industry, Size, and Scope of Operations

2. Organizational Structure Analysis

2.1 McKinsey’s Organizational Structure
2.1.1 Type of Structure
2.1.2 Characteristics: Hierarchy, Responsibilities, and Decision-Making
2.2 Ford Motor Company’s Organizational Structure
2.2.1 Type of Structure
2.2.2 Characteristics: Hierarchy, Responsibilities, and Decision-Making
3. Comparison of Structures
3.1 Similarities in Organizational Structures
3.2 Differences in Organizational Structures
4. Conclusion
4.1 Key Findings
4.2 Recommendations

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 2

 Organizational Structure Analysis

1. Introduction.
In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, an organization’s structure plays a critical
role in determining its efficiency, adaptability, and ability to innovate. Organizational
structure defines the framework within which a company operates, specifying the
division of tasks, responsibilities, and authority. It also influences decision-making
processes and the overall strategy for growth and competitiveness.

This project aims to compare and analyze the organizational structures of two prominent
companies: McKinsey & Company, a global leader in management consulting, and
Ford Motor Company, one of the world’s largest and most influential automotive
manufacturers. Despite their differences in industry, size, and scope of operations, both
organizations have developed complex structures to support their strategic goals and
global operations.

McKinsey operates in a knowledge-based industry where flexibility, client-centric

approaches, and innovation are key, while Ford is part of a highly competitive and
capital-intensive automotive sector that demands operational efficiency and large-scale
coordination. This comparative analysis will delve into the types of organizational
structures these companies utilize, their key characteristics, and how they affect each
company’s ability to compete and grow.

The analysis will focus on the types of structures, including McKinsey’s matrix-based
structure and Ford’s divisional structure, followed by a comparison of their
similarities and differences. This project will highlight the strengths and limitations of
each structure, with a view towards understanding how organizational design can impact
a company’s overall performance and adaptability in their respective industries.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 3

 Organizational Structure Analysis

1.1 Overview of McKinsey

McKinsey & Company is a prestigious global management consulting firm, established

in 1926 by James O. McKinsey, a professor at the University of Chicago. Over the
decades, McKinsey has become synonymous with strategic advice and business
transformation, offering its services to a wide range of organizations, including major
corporations, governments, and non-profit institutions.

The firm's primary focus is on helping clients solve their most pressing business
challenges, guiding them in areas like strategy formulation, operational efficiency,
organizational change, and digital transformation. McKinsey’s reputation is built on its
data-driven approach, in which it employs advanced analytics, cutting-edge technology,
and deep expertise across a variety of sectors to deliver tailored solutions.

Operating in a knowledge-based industry, McKinsey draws upon a wealth of expertise

from a diverse team of over 30,000 consultants and professionals. These experts come
from various fields, including finance, marketing, operations, healthcare, and technology,
enabling McKinsey to tackle complex, multi-disciplinary problems. McKinsey’s
consultants work closely with clients, not just advising them but partnering to implement
solutions and drive measurable results.

The firm serves clients in over 60 countries, making it one of the most geographically
widespread consulting firms in the world. It operates through a network of regional
offices, each adapted to the local business environment while leveraging the firm's global
resources. McKinsey works across industries, from automotive and energy to healthcare,
retail, technology, and public sector, positioning itself as a leader in both the private and
public domains.

Beyond its consulting services, McKinsey has embraced the digital era, helping clients
navigate the complexities of digital transformation by integrating advanced
technologies such as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and data analytics into

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 4

 Organizational Structure Analysis

business processes. The firm’s efforts in the digital space have been bolstered by its
acquisitions of tech-focused consultancies, allowing McKinsey to blend traditional
strategic advice with cutting-edge digital capabilities.

In summary, McKinsey & Company stands as a pillar of the management consulting

industry, known for its analytical rigor, deep expertise, and ability to shape industries by
guiding organizations through periods of transformation and growth. Its global
presence, wide industry focus, and relentless pursuit of client impact have solidified its
position as a trusted advisor to the world's most influential organizations.

1.2 Overview of Ford Motor Company.

Ford Motor Company is an iconic American multinational automaker founded by

Henry Ford in 1903. As one of the world’s largest and most influential automobile
manufacturers, Ford revolutionized the automotive industry with the introduction of the
moving assembly line in 1913, which drastically reduced the cost of production and
made automobiles accessible to the average consumer. This innovation set the foundation
for modern mass production and helped Ford become a dominant force in the global
automotive market.

Headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan, Ford is known for producing a wide range of

vehicles, including cars, trucks, SUVs, and electric vehicles (EVs). Some of its most
popular models include the Ford F-Series (one of the best-selling trucks in the world),
the Ford Mustang, and the Ford Explorer. In recent years, the company has also
become a significant player in the electric vehicle market with its Ford Mustang Mach-
E and the F-150 [Link] operates in over 100 countries with a workforce of
more than 180,000 employees. The company manages a vast global production network,
with manufacturing plants strategically located across North America, Europe, Asia-
Pacific, and other regions. Its operations are divided into key geographical regions and

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 5

 Organizational Structure Analysis

product divisions, allowing Ford to tailor its products and strategies to meet the needs of
various markets.

In addition to its primary focus on automobiles, Ford has also expanded into financial
services through its subsidiary, Ford Credit, which provides financing solutions for
customers and dealerships. This adds another layer to Ford’s business model, allowing it
to offer comprehensive services that cover both the sale and financing of vehicles.

In recent years, Ford has aggressively pursued a strategy of technological innovation,

particularly in the areas of electric vehicles (EVs), autonomous driving, and connectivity.
The company has invested billions into the development of EVs and aims to become a
leader in sustainable mobility by electrifying its product portfolio. It has also embraced
smart mobility solutions, partnering with tech companies to integrate advanced features
such as autonomous driving technologies and connected vehicle systems into its
vehicles.

Ford’s organizational structure is largely divisional, with distinct segments for different
geographic regions (e.g., Ford North America, Ford Europe, Ford China) and product
categories. This structure allows the company to manage its complex operations more
efficiently, ensuring that each division is able to focus on specific market needs and
operational challenges.

In conclusion, Ford Motor Company is a powerhouse in the global automotive industry,

with a rich history of innovation and a forward-looking approach to mobility. Its
continued investments in electric and autonomous vehicles, combined with its global
production and distribution network, ensure that Ford remains a key player in shaping the
future of transportation.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 6

 Organizational Structure Analysis

1.3 Industry, Size, and Scope of Operations

McKinsey & Company operates in the management consulting industry, which is

characterized by providing expert advisory services to businesses, governments, and
organizations across a wide array of sectors. McKinsey’s primary services include
strategic planning, operational improvements, organizational restructuring, and digital
transformation. The firm employs over 30,000 professionals across more than 60
countries, allowing it to serve a global client base. As a leading player in the consulting
industry, McKinsey’s scope is broad, covering industries such as healthcare, finance,
technology, energy, and retail. Its knowledge-based business model focuses on delivering
high-impact solutions to complex business problems, emphasizing analytical rigor, client-
specific insights, and thought leadership.

On the other hand, Ford Motor Company operates within the automotive industry,
which is highly competitive and capital-intensive. The industry revolves around the
design, manufacturing, marketing, and sale of motor vehicles, and includes various
players in the production of cars, trucks, and electric vehicles (EVs). Ford is one of the
largest automakers in the world, with a workforce of approximately 180,000 employees
and production facilities in key regions including North America, Europe, and Asia-
Pacific. The company’s operations span more than 100 countries, and it has an extensive
distribution and service network. Ford’s product portfolio includes a range of vehicles
from traditional combustion-engine models to cutting-edge electric and hybrid cars.
Additionally, Ford has entered the smart mobility and autonomous vehicle markets,
signaling its commitment to evolving with industry trends and technological
advancements.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 7

 Organizational Structure Analysis

2. Organizational Structure Analysis

2.1 McKinsey’s Organizational Structure

2.1.1 Type of Structure

McKinsey & Company operates with a matrix organizational structure that integrates
both functional and project-based components. This structure is designed to maximize
the firm's efficiency and adaptability by combining the strengths of both functional
specialization and project-focused teamwork.

• Functional Component: In McKinsey's matrix structure, consultants are grouped

into specialized practice areas based on their expertise, such as strategy,
operations, digital transformation, and other key areas. Each practice area
serves as a center of excellence, developing deep knowledge and skills relevant to
its field.
• Project Component: Consultants are also assigned to cross-functional project
teams that work on specific client engagements. These teams are composed of
members from various functional areas, allowing them to tackle complex client
challenges from multiple perspectives. This arrangement enables McKinsey to
leverage its specialized knowledge while providing tailored solutions to meet
diverse client needs.

The matrix structure supports McKinsey’s ability to be highly adaptable and responsive
to changing client requirements and market conditions. By organizing around both
functional expertise and client projects, McKinsey can efficiently deploy its talent and
resources where they are most needed, ensuring that each client engagement benefits
from a broad range of skills and insights.

2.1.2 Characteristics: Hierarchy, Responsibilities, and Decision-Making

• Hierarchy: McKinsey’s hierarchy is relatively flat compared to traditional

corporate structures. The organization is structured into several key levels:
o Junior Consultants: Entry-level consultants who support project teams
and gain experience.
o Consultants: More experienced professionals who contribute to project
work and client interactions.
o Managers: Oversee project teams, ensuring that client engagements are
on track and aligned with objectives.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 8

 Organizational Structure Analysis

o Associates: Senior consultants who take on leadership roles in projects

and practice areas.
o Partners: Senior leaders responsible for major client relationships, firm-
wide strategy, and business development.

This flatter hierarchy fosters a collaborative and inclusive environment,

encouraging open communication and knowledge sharing across different levels.
It also enhances teamwork and innovation, as senior leaders are actively
involved in guiding projects and mentoring junior staff.

• Responsibilities: Responsibilities at McKinsey are organized around both client

engagements and functional expertise:
o Client Engagements: Consultants are assigned to project teams based on
their expertise and the specific needs of the client. Each team focuses on
delivering customized solutions, leveraging the combined knowledge from
various practice areas.
o Functional Expertise: Consultants develop specialized knowledge in
their respective practice areas, contributing to the firm’s thought
leadership and overall expertise.

Senior partners and managers oversee the alignment of projects with client
expectations and strategic goals. They ensure that each project is effectively
managed and that solutions are delivered in line with McKinsey’s high standards
of quality.

• Decision-Making: McKinsey employs a decentralized decision-making

approach:
o Strategic Decisions: Senior partners set the strategic direction for the firm
and make high-level decisions related to major client engagements and
firm-wide initiatives.
o Operational Decisions: Project teams have the autonomy to make
decisions regarding the execution of their work. This decentralized
approach allows for quick responses to client needs and fosters
innovative problem-solving.

By empowering teams to make decisions within their projects, McKinsey

supports its emphasis on adaptability and client-centric solutions, enabling the
firm to address complex challenges effectively and deliver impactful results.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 9

 Organizational Structure Analysis

2.2 Ford Motor Company’s Organizational Structure

2.2.1 Type of Structure

Ford Motor Company utilizes a divisional organizational structure, which segments the
company into geographic and product-based divisions. This structure helps Ford
manage its extensive global operations and product portfolio efficiently.

• Geographic Divisions: Ford is divided into regional units such as Ford North
America, Ford Europe, Ford Asia-Pacific, and Ford South America. Each
geographic division oversees the company's operations within its specific region,
including manufacturing, marketing, and sales. This structure allows Ford to tailor
its strategies to local market conditions and consumer preferences, ensuring that
regional needs are met effectively.
• Product Divisions: Ford’s operations are also organized around product
categories such as trucks, SUVs, cars, and electric vehicles. Each product
division is responsible for the development, production, and marketing of its
specific vehicle types. This division enables Ford to focus on innovation and
efficiency within each product category, driving advancements and maintaining
competitiveness across its diverse vehicle lineup.

The divisional structure supports Ford’s ability to manage its large-scale operations and
adapt strategies to varying market and product demands. By segmenting the organization
into geographic and product divisions, Ford can effectively address the complexities of
its global business.

2.2.2 Characteristics: Hierarchy, Responsibilities, and Decision-Making

• Hierarchy: Ford’s organizational structure is characterized by a hierarchical

framework with multiple layers of management:
o Executive Leadership: Includes the CEO and board of directors,
responsible for setting overall company strategy and making high-level
decisions.
o Divisional Managers: Oversee operations within specific geographic or
product divisions, ensuring that regional and product strategies are
implemented effectively.
o Regional Directors: Manage day-to-day operations within their respective
regions, handling local manufacturing, marketing, and sales activities.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 10

 Organizational Structure Analysis

o Departmental Supervisors: Oversee specific functions within divisions,

ensuring smooth operations and adherence to corporate standards.

This hierarchical structure allows for clear lines of authority and accountability,
supporting efficient management of Ford’s extensive global operations and
diverse product portfolio.

• Responsibilities: Responsibilities at Ford are divided between geographic and

product-based divisions:
o Geographic Divisions: Handle local manufacturing, marketing, and sales,
adapting strategies to meet regional demands and regulatory requirements.
o Product Divisions: Focus on the development and management of
specific vehicle types, including research and development, production,
and market positioning.

Each division is responsible for its performance, contributing to Ford’s overall

success by aligning with both regional and product-specific objectives.

• Decision-Making: Decision-making at Ford is centralized at the top levels for

strategic issues:
o Strategic Decisions: Made by the executive leadership team, including
decisions related to company strategy, major investments, and global
initiatives.
o Operational Decisions: Delegated to divisional and regional managers,
who handle decisions related to daily operations and local market
conditions.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 11

 Organizational Structure Analysis

3. Comparison of Structures

3.1 Similarities in Organizational Structures

Despite operating in vastly different industries and scales, McKinsey & Company and
Ford Motor Company exhibit some similarities in their organizational structures:

• Focus on Expertise and Specialization: Both McKinsey and Ford emphasize the
importance of specialized knowledge within their organizational frameworks.
McKinsey's matrix structure organizes consultants into functional practice areas,
allowing for deep expertise in fields such as strategy and operations. Similarly,
Ford’s divisional structure segments the company by product categories and
geographic regions, ensuring that specialized knowledge in vehicle development
and regional market conditions is effectively harnessed.
• Client-Centric Approach: Both organizations place a strong emphasis on
serving their clients’ needs through their organizational design. McKinsey’s
matrix structure allows for tailored project teams that address specific client
challenges, integrating diverse expertise for customized solutions. Ford’s
divisional structure enables the company to adapt its operations to regional and
product-specific demands, ensuring that customer needs are met through localized
manufacturing, marketing, and sales strategies.
• Decentralized Decision-Making for Operational Efficiency: Both McKinsey
and Ford utilize decentralized decision-making within their structures to enhance
operational efficiency. At McKinsey, project teams have autonomy in executing
client engagements, enabling quick and responsive solutions. Ford’s divisional
and regional managers make operational decisions tailored to their specific areas,
allowing for efficient handling of local market conditions and production
challenges.
• Emphasis on Leadership and Management Roles: In both organizations,
leadership roles are crucial in guiding strategic direction and overseeing
performance. McKinsey’s senior partners are deeply involved in high-level client
relationships and firm-wide strategy, while Ford’s executive leadership and
divisional managers play key roles in steering the company’s strategic initiatives
and operational management.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 12

 Organizational Structure Analysis

Responsibilities Focus Pie Charts

70%

60%

50%

40%
McKinsey (%)
30%
Ford (%)

20%

10%

0%
Client Functional Geographic Product
Engagements Expertise Management Management

3.2 Differences in Organizational Structures

While there are similarities, McKinsey & Company and Ford Motor Company also have
distinct differences in their organizational structures that reflect their unique business
needs and operational environments:

• Structure Type: McKinsey operates with a matrix organizational structure,

which integrates functional and project-based elements to foster flexibility and
expertise sharing across different client projects. In contrast, Ford utilizes a
divisional organizational structure, which divides the company into geographic
and product-based divisions to manage large-scale operations and product lines
efficiently. The matrix structure at McKinsey supports a dynamic, project-
oriented approach, while Ford’s divisional structure facilitates more structured
management of global and product-specific activities.
• Hierarchy and Management Levels: McKinsey’s organizational hierarchy is
relatively flat, promoting a collaborative and open communication environment.
Senior partners work closely with project teams, and decision-making is
decentralized. Ford, on the other hand, features a more hierarchical framework
with multiple management layers, including executive leadership, divisional

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 13

 Organizational Structure Analysis

managers, regional directors, and departmental supervisors. This hierarchical

approach supports a clear chain of command and structured management across
its extensive global operations.
• Decision-Making Processes: Decision-making at McKinsey is highly
decentralized, with project teams given significant autonomy in their client
engagements. This decentralization supports rapid adaptation and innovation. In
contrast, Ford’s decision-making is more centralized for strategic matters, with
executive leadership making high-level decisions while delegating operational
decisions to divisional and regional managers. This centralized approach ensures
alignment with overall corporate strategy and facilitates effective management of
complex operations.
• Adaptability and Flexibility: McKinsey’s matrix structure allows for high
adaptability and flexibility, enabling the firm to respond quickly to changing
client needs and project requirements. The structure promotes dynamic team
configurations and knowledge integration. Ford’s divisional structure, while
effective for managing large-scale operations, may be less flexible in rapidly
adapting to market changes due to its more segmented approach. However, it
provides clear focus and accountability within each division.
• Client Interaction and Service Delivery: McKinsey’s matrix structure is
designed to provide highly customized solutions through project teams that
integrate various functional areas. This approach allows for close client
interaction and tailored service delivery. Ford’s divisional structure organizes its
operations around geographic and product divisions, with a focus on managing
extensive manufacturing and distribution networks. While Ford also adapts to
client needs, its approach is more structured around regional and product-specific
requirements.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 14

 Organizational Structure Analysis

Adaptability and Flexibility Comparison

Ford Rating - -
Innovation
Product

Ford Rating - -
Flexibility
Regional

5-Oct 6-Oct 6-Oct 7-Oct 7-Oct

Organizational Effectiveness Metrics

Ford Value - -
Product Quality Rating

Ford Value - -
Market Share

0% 1000000% 2000000% 3000000% 4000000% 5000000%

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 15

 Organizational Structure Analysis

4. Conclusion

4.1 Key Findings

After analyzing the organizational structures of McKinsey & Company and Ford Motor
Company, several key findings emerge:

1. Structure Type and Flexibility: McKinsey employs a matrix organizational

structure, which combines functional and project-based elements to facilitate
flexibility and adaptability. This structure allows for efficient allocation of
specialized knowledge across diverse client projects and enables the firm to
respond quickly to client needs. In contrast, Ford uses a divisional organizational
structure, segmented by geographic regions and product categories. This structure
supports efficient management of large-scale operations and product lines but
may be less flexible in rapidly changing market conditions.
2. Hierarchy and Management: McKinsey’s relatively flat hierarchy promotes a
collaborative and open environment, encouraging communication and teamwork
across different levels. Senior partners play a crucial role in guiding projects and
strategic decisions, with decentralized decision-making empowering project
teams. Ford’s hierarchical framework includes multiple management layers, from
executive leadership to departmental supervisors. This structured approach
ensures clear lines of authority and accountability, supporting effective
management of global and product-specific operations.
3. Responsibilities and Specialization: Both organizations emphasize
specialization, but in different ways. McKinsey organizes consultants into
functional practice areas and cross-functional project teams, allowing for deep
expertise and tailored client solutions. Ford divides responsibilities between
geographic and product-based divisions, focusing on regional and product-
specific management to optimize manufacturing, marketing, and sales.
4. Decision-Making Processes: Decision-making at McKinsey is decentralized,
with project teams having significant autonomy in their client engagements. This

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 16

 Organizational Structure Analysis

approach fosters innovation and rapid response to client needs. Ford’s decision-
making is more centralized for strategic matters, with executive leadership
making high-level decisions while operational decisions are delegated to
divisional and regional managers. This centralized approach ensures alignment
with corporate strategy and efficient management of extensive operations.
5. Client-Centric Focus: Both McKinsey and Ford design their organizational
structures to serve their clients effectively. McKinsey’s matrix structure facilitates
customized, project-specific solutions through integrated teams. Ford’s divisional
structure allows for tailored strategies in different regions and product lines,
ensuring that local and product-specific needs are addressed.

4.2 Recommendations

Based on the analysis of McKinsey’s and Ford’s organizational structures, the following
recommendations can be made for each company to enhance their effectiveness:

For McKinsey & Company:

1. Enhance Cross-Functional Collaboration: While the matrix structure facilitates

cross-functional collaboration, McKinsey could further enhance this by
implementing additional tools and processes for knowledge sharing and
collaboration across project teams. This could include more integrated technology
platforms or regular cross-practice workshops.
2. Strengthen Leadership Development: Given the flat hierarchy and decentralized
decision-making, McKinsey should focus on developing leadership skills at all
levels. Investing in training programs for junior consultants and managers will
ensure that they are well-prepared to take on greater responsibilities and
contribute to the firm's strategic goals.
3. Monitor and Adapt to Market Changes: McKinsey’s matrix structure supports
adaptability, but it is important for the firm to continuously monitor market trends
and client needs. Implementing a more systematic approach for tracking industry

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 17

 Organizational Structure Analysis

changes and client feedback could help McKinsey stay ahead of emerging trends
and maintain its competitive edge.

For Ford Motor Company:

1. Increase Flexibility in Product Divisions: While the divisional structure

supports effective management of product lines, Ford could benefit from
incorporating more flexibility within its product divisions. This could involve
adopting agile methodologies or creating cross-divisional teams to address
emerging trends in automotive technology and consumer preferences.
2. Enhance Regional Autonomy: To improve responsiveness to local market
conditions, Ford might consider granting more autonomy to regional divisions.
This could include empowering regional managers to make more strategic
decisions and tailoring regional strategies based on local insights and consumer
behavior.
3. Integrate Innovation Across Divisions: Ford should focus on integrating
innovation across its geographic and product divisions. Encouraging collaboration
between divisions and investing in innovation hubs or cross-divisional projects
could help drive advancements in technology and product development, ensuring
that Ford remains competitive in the evolving automotive industry.
4. Optimize Decision-Making Processes: Ford’s centralized decision-making
approach is effective for strategic alignment, but the company could explore ways
to streamline decision-making processes to enhance agility. Implementing
decision-support systems or delegating more operational decisions to divisional
managers could improve efficiency and responsiveness.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 18

 Organizational Structure Analysis

5. References

1. McKinsey & Company. (2024). About Us. Retrieved from

[Link]
2. Ford Motor Company. (2024). Corporate Overview. Retrieved from
[Link]
3. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization:
How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment.
Harvard Business Review Press.
4. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the
Research. Prentice-Hall.
5. Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change. Pearson
Education.
6. Daft, R. L. (2018). Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
7. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of
Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill.
8. Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (2002). Designing Effective Organizations: How to
Create Structured Networks. Harvard Business Review Press.
9. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
10. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment:
Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard University Press.
11. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley.
12. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior
Performance. Free Press.

FA-1 Fundamentals of management MBA Sem-1, 2024 19