University of the Punjab

Institute of Information Management

Assignment:
The Importance of Metadata in Organizing Digital
Collections

Submitted by : Ahmad Mujtaba

Submitted To: Dr. Hafiz Nazir

Subject: Information Services and Sources

Department: Information Management

Semester: IIM BS 2nd Semester (Afternoon)

Roll no: 31

Session: 2024-2028

Date Submission: 3 June 2025

Contents
1.Title Page ………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
2.Table of Content ………………………………………………………………………………......
2
3. Abstract...............................................................................................................................................3
4.Introduction to Metadata...................................................................................................................4
i. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................4
Types of Metadata............................................................................................................................5
ii. Background: Context and Summarized Relevant Research............................................................6
iii. Gap and Justification: Research Gap and Approach......................................................................6
iv. Problem Statement: the Core Issue Being Addressed.....................................................................7
v. Structure Overview: Summarize the Structure of the Paper............................................................7
5. Objectives...........................................................................................................................................7
6. Literature Review..............................................................................................................................8
Themes in the Literature......................................................................................................................8
Trends in Metadata Research and Practice..........................................................................................8
Gaps in the Literature..........................................................................................................................9
Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................9
7. Methodology.......................................................................................................................................9
Literature Survey.................................................................................................................................9
Databases and Sources Used..............................................................................................................10
Search Strategy..................................................................................................................................10
Keywords Used..................................................................................................................................10
8. Results...............................................................................................................................................11
i. Classification and Functions of Metadata.......................................................................................11
ii. Metadata Standards Usage.............................................................................................................11
iii. Role in Digital Libraries and Archives.........................................................................................12
iv. Metadata Creation Practices.........................................................................................................12
v. Challenges Identified.....................................................................................................................12
vi. Case Studies and Examples..........................................................................................................12
Summary of Key Insights..................................................................................................................13
9. Significance of Study / Implications...............................................................................................13
Contribution to Knowledge...............................................................................................................13
Practical Implications........................................................................................................................13
Policy Implications............................................................................................................................14
Implications for Future Research.......................................................................................................14
10. Conclusion......................................................................................................................................14
 Key Findings Recap...........................................................................................................................15
Reinforcing the Importance of the Study...........................................................................................15
Recommendations for Future Research.............................................................................................15
11. References.......................................................................................................................................16

3. Abstract
This research investigates the importance and implementation of metadata in the
organization, discovery, and long-term preservation of digital collections. The primary
objective is to examine how different types of metadata—descriptive, structural, technical,
administrative, and preservation—support the lifecycle of digital resources, particularly
within digital libraries and archives. The study employs a qualitative review methodology,
synthesizing established frameworks such as the OAIS (Open Archival Information System)
model and standards like Dublin Core, PREMIS, METS, and MODS. Key findings reveal
that metadata not only facilitates efficient information retrieval and user access but also
ensures the authenticity, provenance, and sustainability of digital content over time. Case
studies, including the PANDORA project and Helsinki University Library’s metadata model,
demonstrate the practical application of metadata standards in real-world digital preservation
initiatives. The study also identifies challenges such as inconsistency in metadata practices,
lack of professional expertise, and technical obsolescence. In conclusion, the paper
emphasizes the need for standardized metadata frameworks, ongoing professional training,
and the integration of emerging technologies like AI and linked data to enhance metadata
creation, interoperability, and preservation workflows. These measures are crucial for
ensuring the reliability and usability of digital repositories in the evolving digital information
landscape.
The Importance of Metadata in Organizing Digital
Collections

4.Introduction to Metadata
i. Introduction
In an age where digital content is being produced at an unprecedented rate, the need to
manage and organize this information has become more critical than ever. From scanned
books and academic research papers to photographs, videos, and government records, the
digital world is vast and continuously expanding. Yet, without a proper system in place, this
information can quickly become overwhelming and even useless. This is where metadata
steps in. Often called “data about data,” metadata provides the structure and meaning behind
digital resources, helping users locate, understand, and preserve them. It acts like a digital
librarian—guiding, organizing, and safeguarding our growing digital heritage.

Metadata, often described as "data about data," is a fundamental component in the

management and preservation of digital collections. It serves as the backbone for organizing,
identifying, and ensuring the long-term accessibility of digital resources, which include both
born-digital materials (created digitally, such as websites or digital photographs) and digitized
content (converted from ana log formats, like scanned books or archived audio recordings).
As the volume of digital information grows exponentially, the role of metadata becomes
increasingly critical in maintaining the usability, discoverability, and integrity of these
collections over time.
Metadata enables institutions to describe digital objects in a structured manner, providing
essential context that aids users in locating and understanding the resources. For example, an
image might be tagged with metadata such as the creator’s name, creation date, subject
keywords, and technical details like resolution or file format. Similarly, a video file could
include metadata about its duration, encoding format, and thematic content. These
descriptions not only enhance discoverability but also ensure that the resources can be
managed and preserved effectively.
The importance of metadata extends beyond basic resource discovery. It plays a vital role in
digital preservation, as highlighted in the OAIS (Open Archival Information System)
Reference Model, which emphasizes the need for preservation metadata to capture the
context, provenance, and technical environment of digital objects. Without comprehensive
metadata, digital resources risk becoming inaccessible as technologies evolve. For instance,
metadata documenting the software and hardware required to render a file ensures that future
users can understand and access the content even as original systems become obsolete.
Metadata can be categorized into several types, each serving distinct functions:
1. Descriptive Metadata: Facilitates discovery and identification, such as titles, authors,
and keywords.
2. Structural Metadata: Defines relationships between components, like the order of
pages in a digitized book.
 3. Technical Metadata: Includes technical details like file formats, checksums, and
hardware/software requirements.
4. Administrative Metadata: Covers rights management, preservation actions, and
provenance.
Projects like PREMIS (Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies) and standards like
METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard) provide frameworks for
implementing preservation metadata, ensuring interoperability across systems. Meanwhile,
initiatives such as the CEDARS and PANDORA projects demonstrate how metadata can be
tailored to specific preservation needs, such as documenting migration histories or
authenticity checks.

Types of Metadata
Metadata serves as the foundational element for the organization, discovery, management,
and preservation of digital content. Different types of metadata fulfill distinct purposes across
the lifecycle of a digital object, from creation to long-term preservation. According to various
preservation and archival frameworks such as the Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
and PREMIS, metadata can be broadly classified into five major categories: descriptive,
structural, administrative, technical, and preservation metadata.
Descriptive Metadata
Descriptive metadata is used to identify and describe the intellectual content of a resource. It
includes elements such as the title, creator, subject, keywords, and description, all of which
support search, discovery, and access. For example, in digital libraries, descriptive metadata
helps users locate specific documents or images through keyword searches. Standards like
Dublin Core and MODS are commonly used for descriptive metadata. As noted in the
Helsinki University Library model, these elements can be further refined to support
preservation by including metadata qualifiers such as “strategy,” “tools used,” or “changes
made”.
Structural Metadata
Structural metadata defines the relationships between components of a digital object. This
includes page order in digitized books, chapter hierarchy in eBooks, or file sequences in
multimedia collections. For instance, a digitized journal may contain images, texts, and audio
annotations, and structural metadata ensures these are organized logically and presented in
the correct sequence. Standards like METS and MPEG-21 DIDL are used to encode such
relationships in XML-based metadata containers.
Administrative Metadata
Administrative metadata supports the management of digital resources. It includes rights and
access control, licensing, ownership, acquisition details, and version history. This metadata
ensures that digital objects comply with legal requirements and that institutions can maintain
control over digital assets. The Dublin Core framework recognizes these as essential for long-
term control, especially in recordkeeping and archival systems.
Technical Metadata
Technical metadata captures the technical details necessary for rendering and maintaining
digital objects. It includes file format, compression algorithms, software and hardware
requirements, color depth, resolution, and digitization methods. Standards such as MIX
(Metadata for Images in XML Schema) and Text MD (for text-based objects) define content-
type-specific technical metadata to ensure files are usable across systems and over time.

Preservation Metadata
Preservation metadata is specifically designed to support long-term digital preservation. It
includes information about the provenance, fixity (such as checksums), authenticity,
preservation actions (e.g., migrations), and technical dependencies. Frameworks like
PREMIS define semantic units such as object history, event tracking, and agents involved in
preservation. Preservation metadata ensures that digital resources can be validated,
understood, and used even decades after their creation.

Example: Scanned Newspaper Page

A scanned newspaper page is a good example to illustrate these metadata types:
 Descriptive: Title, date, article headlines, and subject tags.
 Structural: Page number, position in issue, related articles or advertisements.
 Administrative: Institution that scanned the page, copyright holder, and access rights.
 Technical: Image resolution (600dpi), file format (TIFF), scanner settings.
 Preservation: Format migration logs, fixity information (checksums), and
documentation of any changes made during preservation.
This structured classification of metadata is essential for ensuring the usability, authenticity,
and interoperability of digital collections. Each type supports a unique function, and
collectively, they provide a comprehensive framework for the effective management of
digital resources throughout their lifecycle.

ii. Background: Context and Summarized Relevant Research

Over the years, metadata has been widely studied and implemented across various digital
environments, especially in libraries, museums, archives, and educational institutions.
Researchers and practitioners have developed multiple metadata standards to support
different needs. For example, Dublin Core is commonly used for general description of
resources, while PREMIS is designed specifically for preservation metadata. Other standards
like METS, MODS, and MARC help package, describe, and manage complex digital
objects. These frameworks not only improve resource discovery and access but also ensure
long-term usability and compliance with institutional policies. The role of metadata in digital
preservation, authentication, and system interoperability has been emphasized in models like
the OAIS (Open Archival Information System), which many digital repositories follow.

iii. Gap and Justification: Research Gap and Approach

Despite the availability of various metadata standards and tools, there is a significant gap
between theoretical knowledge and real-world implementation. Many organizations either do
not fully understand how to apply these standards or lack the trained personnel and resources
to do so effectively. In some cases, metadata is created inconsistently or not maintained over
time, which leads to issues in data retrieval, loss of context, and digital decay. This research
aims to bridge that gap by examining the types, roles, and management of metadata in digital
libraries and archives. It also explores best practices and tools for metadata creation and
highlights examples from successful case studies to provide practical insights and solutions.

iv. Problem Statement: the Core Issue Being Addressed

The core issue this paper addresses is the inconsistent and underdeveloped use of
metadata in digital collections. While metadata is essential for organizing, preserving, and
retrieving digital information, many institutions face difficulties in standardizing metadata
practices, maintaining quality over time, and integrating multiple systems. As a result,
valuable digital content often becomes inaccessible, difficult to locate, or at risk of permanent
loss. This not only limits user access and engagement but also threatens the sustainability and
integrity of digital repositories. Without proper metadata strategies, even the most
comprehensive digital collections lose their value over time.

v. Structure Overview: Summarize the Structure of the Paper

This paper is organized into ten main sections. It begins with an introduction to metadata
and its importance in managing digital resources. Next, it explores the different types of
metadata, including descriptive, structural, technical, administrative, and preservation
metadata. The following sections examine the role of metadata in digital libraries and
archives, as well as key standards and schemas used worldwide. After that, the paper
discusses metadata creation and management, followed by the connection between
metadata and digital preservation. Further sections highlight how metadata supports search
and retrieval, the challenges faced in its implementation, and a review of case studies or
examples demonstrating best practices. The paper concludes with a summary and
recommendations for future directions in metadata usage.
5. Objectives
This research aims to explore the significance, structure, and implementation of metadata in
digital collections, particularly within libraries and archives. The key objectives are:

 To define metadata and explain its various types and functions in digital
environments.
 To analyze the role of metadata in organizing, preserving, and retrieving digital
content.
 To examine widely used metadata standards and schemas, such as Dublin Core,
PREMIS, METS, and MODS.
 To investigate methods and tools for creating, managing, and validating metadata.
 To identify common challenges and limitations in metadata implementation across
institutions.
 To study real-world case examples that demonstrate effective metadata usage.
 To recommend strategies and future directions for improving metadata practices,
including the use of AI and linked data.

6. Literature Review
Metadata has been a cornerstone of digital information management, evolving from simple
resource descriptions to complex frameworks supporting digital preservation,
interoperability, and intelligent retrieval systems. The literature consistently emphasizes
metadata’s dual role in enhancing discoverability and ensuring the long-term usability of
digital content.

Themes in the Literature

A foundational theme is the categorization of metadata into key types—descriptive,
structural, administrative, technical, and preservation. Each serves a unique purpose
across the digital object lifecycle (Caplan, 2017; Zeng & Qin, 2016). For example,
descriptive metadata aids in search and access, while preservation metadata documents fixity,
provenance, and transformations—critical for digital longevity (PREMIS Editorial
Committee, 2015).

The OAIS model (Lavoie, 2014; CCSDS, 2012) provides a high-level conceptual framework
that many institutions use to guide metadata design and repository development. It introduces
Preservation Description Information (PDI), which includes provenance, reference, fixity,
and context metadata—all necessary for trust and reuse of digital content.

The literature also details metadata standards and their role in supporting interoperability
and data exchange. Widely used schemas include:

 Dublin Core for general description (Baca, 2016)

  MARC for library cataloging (Caplan & Guenther, 2016)
 MODS for detailed bibliographic information (Library of Congress)
 METS and MPEG-21 DIDL as XML containers for metadata aggregation
 PREMIS for recording preservation-related events and technical dependencies
(Dappert & Enders, 2010)

These standards are often combined within institutional repositories to ensure scalability and
cross-platform metadata integration (Park & Tosaka, 2010).

Trends in Metadata Research and Practice

Emerging trends point toward increasing automation in metadata creation. AI and machine
learning are being used to extract and enhance metadata from text, images, and audiovisual
materials (Lynch, 2017; Europeana Foundation, 2019). For instance, EXIF data embedded in
image files or auto-tagging software can streamline metadata generation, particularly for
large datasets.

Another trend is the development of linked open data and semantic metadata models,
which enhance connectivity and discoverability across digital platforms. Projects like
Europeana and the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) leverage semantic web
technologies to link metadata records, improving the richness and reusability of metadata
across disciplines.

Institution-specific adaptations, such as the three-level metadata model at Helsinki

University Library, show how institutions are refining standards to suit local preservation
needs (Helsinki University Library, 2018).

Gaps in the Literature

Despite the progress, several gaps and challenges persist:

 Inconsistent application of metadata standards across institutions results in poor

interoperability and metadata silos (Park & Tosaka, 2010).
 Many institutions still rely on locally developed or ad hoc schemas, limiting data
sharing capabilities (Tani et al., 2013).
 Metadata quality and validation are often neglected due to resource constraints and
lack of skilled staff (Erway, 2013).
 The sustainability of metadata systems is uncertain in light of evolving technologies
and the need for regular schema updates (Harvey, 2010).

There is also limited empirical research on metadata implementation outcomes, especially

in non-Western or resource-constrained institutions. Case studies like PANDORA (National
Library of Australia, 2020) illustrate success but may not reflect broader institutional
capabilities.
7. Methodology
This section outlines the research process used to gather and analyze relevant literature on
metadata and its role in digital collection management and preservation.

Literature Survey
A systematic literature survey was conducted to explore existing research, scholarly
discussions, and institutional practices related to metadata creation, standards, and
applications. The focus was on peer-reviewed articles, technical reports, books, and metadata
framework documentation published between 2000 and 2024. Emphasis was placed on
sources that discussed metadata types, digital preservation strategies, and the role of metadata
in digital libraries and archives.

The survey included foundational texts (such as Introduction to Metadata by Baca and
Metadata Fundamentals by Caplan), empirical studies, and case reports (like those on
PANDORA and PREMIS), as well as technical frameworks like OAIS and PREMIS.

Databases and Sources Used

To ensure the credibility and diversity of sources, the following academic databases and
repositories were used:

 Google Scholar – for a wide array of academic publications and citations.

 JSTOR – for scholarly journal articles in library and information science.
 Emerald Insight – for peer-reviewed articles in digital curation and metadata
management.
 IEEE Xplore – for technical articles related to digital preservation systems.
 ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) – for information science and
library education materials.
 Library of Congress and PREMIS websites – for official standards and
implementation guidelines.
 OCLC Research & Europeana Foundation – for institutional reports and metadata
implementation case studies.

Search Strategy
The research was conducted using a structured search strategy to ensure relevance and focus.
The steps included:

1. Initial Screening: Abstracts and titles were reviewed to identify studies focusing
specifically on metadata in digital collections, digital preservation, and library
science.
2. Inclusion Criteria:
o Published between 2000–2024.
o Focused on metadata standards, preservation strategies, or digital library
practices.
o Provided case studies, models, or empirical analysis.
 3. Exclusion Criteria:
o Articles focused exclusively on non-digital preservation (e.g., analog
archives).
o Resources lacking academic credibility (e.g., blogs or forum posts).

Full-text review was conducted for selected articles, and key points were extracted using
note-taking tools and citation managers for organization.

Keywords Used
To ensure comprehensive coverage, the following keywords and phrases were used in various
combinations during database searches:

 “Metadata in digital libraries”

 “Types of metadata”
 “Digital preservation metadata”
 “PREMIS metadata standard”
 “OAIS model”
 “Descriptive and technical metadata”
 “METS schema”
 “Dublin Core applications”
 “Digital curation best practices”
 “Metadata interoperability and quality”

Boolean operators (AND, OR), quotation marks, and filters for publication date and subject
area were used to refine search results.

8. Results
The findings from the literature review and metadata framework analysis are organized
according to key themes relevant to the organization, preservation, and accessibility of digital
collections. These insights align closely with the research objectives and methodology,
demonstrating the multifaceted role of metadata in digital environments.

i. Classification and Functions of Metadata

The research confirmed that metadata is classified into five major types, each playing a
unique role in the lifecycle of digital resources:

Type of Metadata Function

Descriptive Enables search and discovery through titles, subjects, creators.

Structural Organizes relationships within digital objects (e.g., chapters, file order).
Type of Metadata Function

Technical Records technical details like file format, resolution, software dependencies.

Administrative Manages access rights, licensing, and ownership.

Preservation Documents fixity, provenance, and preservation actions (e.g., migration logs).

ii. Metadata Standards Usage

Several widely adopted metadata standards were identified across institutions:

 Dublin Core: Used for simple, general-purpose resource description.

 MARC: Traditional library cataloging, still in use for legacy system compatibility.
 MODS: XML-based, suitable for detailed bibliographic data.
 PREMIS: Essential for preservation metadata, focusing on object, event, agent, and
rights information.
 METS: Acts as a metadata container that combines descriptive, administrative, and
structural metadata.

iii. Role in Digital Libraries and Archives

Key functions of metadata in digital libraries and archives include:

 Resource Discovery: Users can search digital collections using metadata filters (e.g.,
keyword, date, format).
 Authenticity & Provenance: Preservation metadata verifies file integrity and
transformation history.
 Interoperability: Standards like OAIS and PREMIS ensure metadata can be reused
and exchanged across systems.

iv. Metadata Creation Practices

Findings indicate a mixed approach to metadata creation:

 Manual Creation: Applied to complex or unique items (e.g., historical manuscripts).

 Automated Tools: Used for extracting technical metadata via tools like JHOVE and
EXIF readers.
 Best Practices: Controlled vocabularies and schema validation tools (e.g.,
Schematron, XML validators) are recommended for ensuring metadata quality.
v. Challenges Identified
The study revealed several recurring implementation challenges:

 Inconsistent application of metadata standards.

 Shortage of trained metadata professionals.
 High cost and time involved in manual metadata creation.
 Metadata obsolescence and maintenance in response to evolving technologies.

vi. Case Studies and Examples

Real-world implementations highlight the importance and success of metadata strategies:

 PANDORA Project (Australia): Demonstrated structured metadata use for

preserving web content.
 Helsinki University Library: Developed extended Dublin Core for preservation
needs.
 PREMIS Framework: Supported consistent documentation of preservation actions
like file migration and fixity checks.

Summary of Key Insights

 Metadata is essential for access, preservation, and trust in digital collections.
 Standardized schemas improve consistency, sharing, and long-term usability.
 The future of metadata lies in automation, linked data, and enhanced
interoperability.

9. Significance of Study / Implications

The findings of this study significantly contribute to both academic understanding and
practical applications in the field of information management, especially within digital
libraries, archives, and digital preservation systems.

Contribution to Knowledge
 Enhanced Understanding of Metadata Functions: This research provides a
comprehensive overview of the five major types of metadata (descriptive, structural,
technical, administrative, and preservation), offering a clear framework for how each
type contributes to digital object management.
 Clarification of Standards and Best Practices: The study identifies and compares
various metadata standards (e.g., Dublin Core, PREMIS, METS), clarifying their
appropriate usage scenarios and promoting standardized implementation.
  Awareness of Real-world Applications: Through analysis of case studies like the
PANDORA Project and Helsinki University Library, the study bridges theory and
practice, illustrating how metadata functions in live institutional settings.

Practical Implications
 For Libraries and Archives: Institutions can use the insights to develop or improve
metadata strategies, ensuring that digital resources remain discoverable, authentic, and
preserved over time. It encourages adopting interoperable metadata standards and
validation tools.
 For Digital Preservation Projects: The emphasis on preservation metadata
underscores the importance of documenting file integrity, migration history, and
provenance—vital for long-term accessibility and trust.
 For Metadata Creators and IT Professionals: The study highlights the need for
trained personnel and the integration of automated tools like JHOVE, helping balance
accuracy with efficiency.

Policy Implications
 Standardization Policies: Institutions should adopt international metadata standards
and establish internal metadata profiles to ensure interoperability and consistency
across systems.
 Training and Capacity Building: The shortage of metadata specialists suggests a
need for academic programs and professional training focused on metadata practices,
preservation frameworks, and metadata quality control.

Implications for Future Research

 AI and Automated Metadata Creation: Future studies can explore how artificial
intelligence can further enhance metadata generation, especially for complex media
types like audio, video, or multilingual text.
 Linked Data and Interoperability: As institutions adopt linked open data models,
research should focus on metadata integration across repositories and platforms to
improve semantic connectivity.
 Metadata in Non-Western Contexts: More empirical studies are needed to evaluate
metadata practices in developing countries or non-English-speaking regions where
institutional infrastructure may differ.

This study not only emphasizes the critical role metadata plays in organizing and preserving
digital collections but also lays a foundation for future advancements in digital curation. By
understanding the implications of metadata at both theoretical and practical levels,
institutions and researchers are better equipped to manage the growing complexity of digital
information systems.

10. Conclusion
This study has explored the critical role of metadata in the organization, discovery, and long-
term preservation of digital collections. Through a comprehensive review of literature,
metadata standards, and real-world applications, several important insights and conclusions
have emerged.

Key Findings Recap

 Types and Functions of Metadata: Metadata is classified into descriptive, structural,
administrative, technical, and preservation types. Each serves a vital role in managing
digital content across its lifecycle.
 Standards and Interoperability: International standards such as Dublin Core,
PREMIS, METS, and MODS ensure metadata consistency, enhance discoverability,
and support digital preservation efforts across institutions.
 Digital Libraries and Archives: Metadata enables efficient cataloguing,
searchability, and validation of digital content, thereby supporting both user access
and institutional responsibilities.
 Creation and Management: A combination of manual and automated methods is
used for metadata generation. Best practices include use of controlled vocabularies,
validation tools, and metadata profiles.
 Preservation and Trustworthiness: Preservation metadata captures important
historical and technical information, ensuring that digital objects remain accessible
and authentic despite technological changes.
 Challenges: Key issues include inconsistent metadata practices, lack of trained
professionals, high cost of manual entry, and challenges in maintaining metadata over
time.

Reinforcing the Importance of the Study

This study underscores that metadata is not optional—it is foundational to every digital
information system. Without structured metadata, digital collections risk becoming
unsearchable, unusable, or lost to obsolescence. The effective use of metadata enhances
institutional efficiency, supports legal compliance, and ensures the long-term value of digital
assets.

Recommendations for Future Research

 Investigating the use of AI and machine learning for scalable metadata generation.
  Evaluating metadata quality assurance models across different cultural and
institutional contexts.
 Exploring linked open data and semantic technologies for richer metadata
relationships and interoperability.
 Assessing the impact of metadata training programs in academic and professional
environments.

In conclusion, metadata plays a central and transformative role in digital curation.

Institutions must prioritize its standardization, creation, and preservation to ensure that digital
collections continue to serve users now and in the future.

11. References
Baca, M. (Ed.). (2016). Introduction to metadata (3rd ed.). Getty Publications.

Caplan, P. (2017). Metadata fundamentals for all librarians. ALA Editions.

Caplan, P., & Guenther, R. (2016). Practical preservation metadata. D-Lib Magazine, 22(1/2).
https://doi.org/10.1045/january2016-caplan

CCSDS. (2012). Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) (ISO
14721:2012). Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. https://public.ccsds.org

Calanag, M. L., Sugimoto, S., & Tabata, K. (2001). A metadata approach to digital
preservation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata
Applications (pp. 143–147).

Dappert, A., & Enders, M. (2010). Digital preservation metadata standards. Information
Standards Quarterly, 22(2), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv22n2.2010.02

Erway, R. (2013). You’ve got to walk before you can run: First steps for managing born-
digital content. OCLC Research. https://oclc.org/research/publications/library/2013/2013-
01r.html

Europeana Foundation. (2019). Europeana metadata standards.

https://pro.europeana.eu/page/metadata

Harvey, R. (2010). Digital curation: A how-to-do-it manual. Neal-Schuman.

Helsinki University Library. (2018). Metadata model for digital preservation.

https://www.helsinki.fi/en/library
Lavoie, B. (2014). The open archival information system (OAIS) reference model. DPC
Technology Watch Report. Digital Preservation Coalition. https://www.dpconline.org

Lynch, C. (2017). Stewardship in the "age of algorithms." First Monday, 22(12).

https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i12.8097

National Library of Australia. (2020). PANDORA archive: Preservation metadata

framework. https://www.nla.gov.au/pandora

Park, J.-R., & Tosaka, Y. (2010). Metadata creation practices in digital repositories and
collections: Schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability. Information Technology and
Libraries, 29(3), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i3.3145

PREMIS Editorial Committee. (2015). PREMIS data dictionary for preservation metadata
(Version 3.0). Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/

Tani, A., Candela, L., & Castelli, D. (2013). Dealing with metadata quality. Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 823–837.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22844

Zeng, M. L., & Qin, J. (2016). Metadata (2nd ed.). Neal-Schuman.