Complex Regulatory Scheme

The Constitution for the United States granted congress the power to: 

Lay and collect taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common
defence and general welfare of the United States. [Art. I sec. 8, cl. 4]; 

To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, [Art. I sec. 8 cl. 3]; 

To establish uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcy, [Art. I sec. 8 cl. 4]; 

To declare war, grant letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land
and water, [Art. I sec. 8 cl. 11]; 

To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases, whatsoever, over such district (not to exceed ten miles
square) as may, by cession of particular states, and acceptance by congress, become the seat of
government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the
consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection Forts, Magazines,
Arsenals, dock yards and other needful things.

Congress has the power under Article I of the Constitution to authorize an administrative agency
administering a complex regulatory scheme to allocate costs and benefits among voluntary
participants in the program without providing an Article III adjudication of claims. [Am. Jur. 2nd
Fedcourts sec. 7].

Congress, acting for a valid legislative purpose, pursuant to its powers under Article I, may create a
―seemingly private‖ right that is so closely integrated into a public regulatory scheme as to be a
matter appropriate for agency resolution with limited involvement by the Article III judiciary.
Agency resolution of such federal rights may take the form of binding arbitration with limited
judicial review. [Am. Jur. 2nd Fedcourts sec 7]

So, to cement their encroachment of power over the American people beyond the ten miles square,
congress created a complex regulatory scheme called the federal (and state) Statutes, Codes and
Regulations, to allocate costs, for the collection of taxes, duties and excises, for the payment of the
national debt, and to provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States.

Congress so closely integrated a seemingly private right (right to contract) into this complex
regulatory scheme to turn unsuspecting American sovereigns, creators of the United States, into
seemingly voluntary participants in the program; seemingly voluntary participants in binding
contracts, having received limited or no valuable consideration in the exchange and failing full
disclosure of the terms and conditions of said contracts which are contrary to the best interest of the
American people.

591
The federal courts have become administrative courts employing Executive Administrators charged
with the enforcement of codes and statutes, [FRC v GE 281 US 464, KELLER v PE 261 US 428, 1
Stat. 138-1788], to collect the taxes, duties, imposts and excises for the payment of the national debt
in accordance with Article I of the Constitution. In 1976 Public Law 94-381 officially brought the
federal courts under the executive branch operating under Article I of the Constitution in violation
of the separation of powers.
The U.S. District courts have original jurisdiction over all maritime causes; of all land seizures
under the Admiralty Extension Act; of all actions of Prize; and of all nonmaritime seizures under
any law of the United States on land or water. [28 USCA sec. 1356]

The Commerce Clause, [Art. I sec. 8, cl. 13] of the Constitution is a sufficient basis for federal
admiralty power while the Admiralty Extension Act brought the Admiralty jurisdiction inland.

The Trading With The Enemy Act made all Americans enemy combatants and enemies of the
United States and placed all Americans on the list maintained by the Custodian of the Alien
Property, [Secretary of the U.S. Treasury] making all Americans subject to the seizure of our bodies
and our private property under the laws of war or the Laws of Prize under Choses in action for
satisfaction of a contractual obligation, express or implied.

When one defaults on his contractual obligations to pay his share of the national debt, which is
based on the Law of Contributions, his private property becomes subject to seizure, Juri Belli, out
of the hands of the enemy by the right or laws of Prize, by Privateers acting under Letters of
Marque and Reprisal under Article I, sec. 8, cl. 11 of the Constitution.

Congress has empowered members of the private B.A.R. Association with a monopoly in the U.S.
courts, as Privateers acting under Letters of Marque and Reprisal, (B.A.R. Association Card No. =
Letter of Marque document no.) to seize the property and the body of the offender in order to obtain
satisfaction for the obligations for which he has contracted, knowingly or otherwise.

However, there are several things intrinsically flawed, unconscionable and/or fraudulent about this
complex regulatory scheme.

We the People of America are Party to an important equity contract with the United States; the
―Original Equity Contract‖, whereby We the People allow the United States the use of our ‗good
faith and credit‘ which is transmitted to the U.S. via the transmitting utility, public vessel
‗strawman‘. Said public vessel, transmitting utility was created and registered by the state only days
after our birth into this world, obviously without our consent. In exchange for the use of our credit
the United States has promised to pay/discharge all of the debt of the sovereign, via the public
vessel, providing the dual consideration necessary for a valid contract.

It has been established as a matter of fact that the United States has executed said equity contract
with this Petitioner, having created funds from the credit of Petitioner, thereby charging their debtor
obligation for the exchange. It has been established in fact that, ―All that government does and
provides legitimately is in pursuit of its duty to provide protection for private rights [Wynnhammer
v People, 13 NY 378] which duty is a debt owed to its creator, We the People of America, and the
un-enfranchised individual; which debt and duty is never extinguished nor discharged, and is
perpetual. No matter what the defacto government provides for us in the manner 592 of
convenience and safety, the un-enfranchised individual owes nothing to the government. [Hale v
Henkle 201 US 43]

―We the People have discharged any debt which is said to exist or owed to the state. The
governments are, presumably, indebted continually to the People, because the People, the
sovereigns, presumably accented to the creation of the government corporation and because we
suffer its continued existence. The continued debt owed to the American People is discharged only
as it continues not to violate our private rights, and when government fails in its duty to provide
protection- discharge its duty to the People- it is an abandonment (delictual default) of any and all
power, authority or vestige of sovereignty which it may have otherwise possessed, and the law
remains the same, the sovereignty reverting back to the People whence it came.‖ [Downes v Bidwell
182 US 244 (1901)]

It is an accepted maxim of law that a contract is controlling until superseded by a new contract,
whereby the new contract becomes the controlling document. To overcome the United States‘
debtor obligations to We the American People for the use of our good faith and credit in the
‗original equity contract‘, Congress embedded numerous secret adhesion contracts and
assumptions/presumptions into their complex regulatory scheme for which they hold the People
accountable. If a [government] comes down from their position of sovereignty, and enters the
domain of commerce, it submits itself to the same laws that govern individuals there. The U.S. must
do business on business terms. Once the United States waives its immunity and does business with
its citizens, it does so much as a party never cloaked in immunity.

Parties to a contract have an obligation to operate with full disclosure and honesty, acting in good
faith and with clean hands. ―Even in the domain of private contract law, the author of a standard
form agreement is required to state its terms with clarity and candor. Surely, no less is required [396
US 222] of the United States when it does business with its citizens.‖ [US v Seckinger 397 US 203]

In the complex regulatory scheme created by congress, the U.S. secretly presumes that the living
man, American sovereign, to be the legal fiction public vessel, its surety and/or beneficiary. The
U.S. presumes that the American sovereign has assented to paying the debt of the corporation; to
being a debtor and insolvent bankrupt having pledged ourselves as sureties for the debts of the U.S.

The United States has never informed the American People of these assumptions/ presumptions
which they hold against us nor the consequences thereof. In the contrary, the U.S. has invested 75
years of propaganda to indoctrinate the American People that: 
The sovereign is the legal fiction transmitting utility; 

The S.S. # is mandatory; 

The filing of an IRS 1040 form is mandatory for the American sovereign; 

It is mandatory for the American People to register our private property with the state, effectively
and secretly transferring title to the state;
 The Codes and Statutes pertain to the American sovereign; 

These secret adhesion contracts are valid and binding, having failed to inform the American
sovereign of the terms and conditions of the secret adhesion contracts attached thereto; having
failed at equal, dual consideration;

593 

The Codes and Statutes pertain to all sovereigns and not just to agents and employees of the U.S.

And much, much more. The U.S. has failed at full disclosure; having failed to inform the American
sovereign of the existence of the original contract which was executed when we were/are only days
old without full disclosure and/or our consent, or that these secret contracts effectively void our
original contract and have effectively allowed the United States to steal the personal exemptions of
the American people thereby leaving the American People and this Petitioner without a remedy.
The United States has not only failed at full disclosure but has taken overt steps to deceive and
misinform the American People. The U.S. has employed the use of threats and intimidation to
maintain the illusion they have invested years creating to side step their debtor obligations to the
American People in our original equity contracts.

The postal zone, general post office, seat of government of the United States, under the direction of
the postmaster general, John (Jack) E. Potter, has become a continuing criminal enterprise
consistently operating contrary to the best interest of the American People, whose property has been
placed at risk to fund the U.S., and a breach of the original contract(s) with this Petitioner and each
and every one of the American People.

The establishment of the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office under the
direction of John (Jack) E. Potter, by the organic post office for the united states of America is a
breach of contract for its failure to provide a republican form of government for the American
People.

The United States has been operating in receivership continuously for decades with numerous
reorganizations. The receivership has exceeded its term life by several years. The time has come to
liquidate the beast and close the books on the receivership. It is time for the American People to
exercise our right of redemption of our private property that has been placed at risk to fund the
receivership.

The United States is restraining the American people‘s right of redemption of the property to extend
the term of receivership and the criminal activity which has infected the entire zone. The United
States has blocked numerous attempts by this Treaty Executor to redeem the property via discharge
of the debt. The United States, operating under the direction of the Post Master General has used
threats, intimidation, imprisonment, trickery and deceit to steal the American people‘s personal
exemption(s), blocking our right of redemption and leaving the American people with no available
remedy.