ISSN (Online) 2581-9429

IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal
Impact Factor: 7.53 Volume 4, Issue 4, March 2024

A Study on Delegated Legislation

Vijay Anand. T
BA.,LLB(Hons)
Hindustan School of Law, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Hindustan University, Padur
vijayanandstr7@[Link]

Abstract: The Constitution of Indian empowers Legislature to make laws for the country. One of the
significant legislative functions is to determine a legislative policy and to frame it as a rule of conduct.
Obviously such powers cannot be conferred on other institutions. But keeping in mind various multifarious
activities of a welfare State, it is not possible for the legislature to perform all the functions. In such
situations, the delegated legislation comes into the picture. Delegated Legislature is one of the essential
elements of administration whereby the executive has to perform certain legislative functions. However, one
must not forget the risk associated with the process of delegation. Very often, an overburdened Legislature
may unduly exceed the limits of delegation. It may not lay down any policy; may declare any of its policy as
vague and may set down any guidelines for the executive thereby conferring wide discretion to the executive
to change or modify any policy framed by it without reserving for itself any control over subordinate
legislation. Therefore, even though the Legislature can delegate some of its functions, it must not lose its
control completely over such functions. The Privy Council was the most astounding Court for claim from
India in sacred issues till 1949. The topic of lawfulness preceded the Privy Council in the acclaimed
instance of [Link]. Birah (1878) 3 AC 889.(Tamil Nadu (India). Legislature. Legislative Assembly. Committee
on Delegated Legislation) An Act was passed in 1869 by the Indian Legislature to expel Goro Hills from the
common and criminal ward of Bengal and vested the forces of common and criminal organization in an
official named by the Legislative Governor of Bengal. The main aim of the paper is to study the history of
delegated legislation and the objectives are To study the delegated legislation and to study criticisms of
delegated legislation and to study the history of delegated legislation. The sample size are The number of
samples taken are [Link] dependent variables are, Do you think delegated legislation saves the time of
parliament, Are you aware of delegated legislation. The independent variable is *gender. From the
research paper I would like to conclude that though delegated legislation has various criticisms the
delegated legislation widely helps to reduce the burden of the parliament and enables the state makes laws
for people welfare and states development.

Keywords: Delegated legislation , enabling act, constitution, administration, legislation, executive

I. INTRODUCTION
The issue of delegated legislation has been one of the most discussed issues in the area of lawful hypothesis on account
of its different ramifications.(“III. Parliamentary Criticisms of Delegated Legislation”) Researchers have reliably
introduced varying and notwithstanding negating perspectives about appointment of capacity to enact and have in this
manner taken various stands on the issue.(Elliott and Varuhas) While Delegated Legislation has been a boundless
practice in current occasions and is very nearly an acknowledged standard, there have been opposite perspectives. For
example Cooley has communicated a staunchly basic perspective on the ability to assign.(Clements) He has expressed
that "One of the settled sayings in sacred law is that the power given upon the assembly to make laws can't be assigned
by that division to some other body or specialist.(Chen) Where the sovereign intensity of the State has found the expert,
there it must remain; and by the sacred organization alone the laws must be made until the constitution itself is
changed.(Mitchell and Else Mitchell) The ability to whose judgment, insight, and nationalism this high privilege has
been depended can't calm itself of the duty by picking different organizations whereupon the power will be
degenerated, nor would it be able to substitute the judgment, astuteness, and enthusiasm of some other body for those to
which alone the general population have wanted to trust this sovereign trust.(Pemberton)" Further ha has additionally

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/568 581

[Link]
 ISSN (Online) 2581-9429
IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal
Impact Factor: 7.53 Volume 4, Issue 4, March 2024

seen that "No authoritative body can delegate to another branch of the legislature, or to some other expert, the power,
either for the most part or uniquely, to establish laws.(Carr) The reason is found in the very presence of its own forces.
This high privilege has been endowed to its very own intelligence, judgment, and nationalism, and not to those of
different people, and it will act ultra vires on the off chance that it embraces to appoint the trust, rather than executing
it.(Pearce)While such positions do bring up the issues about the legitimacy of designating the ability to enact by higher
authoritative bodies to the lower ones, the reality remains this has been a general practice followed in all cutting edge
majority rule nations.(Hewitt) Consequently it is essential to comprehend what is right off the bat implied by appointed
enactment and after that examine its different viewpoints.(Bharadvaja)

II. HISTORY OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION

The Privy Council was the most astounding Court for claim from India in sacred issues till 1949. The topic of
lawfulness preceded the Privy Council in the acclaimed instance of [Link]. Birah (1878) 3 AC 889.(Tamil Nadu (India).
Legislature. Legislative Assembly. Committee on Delegated Legislation) An Act was passed in 1869 by the Indian
Legislature to expel Goro Hills from the common and criminal ward of Bengal and vested the forces of common and
criminal organization in an official named by the Legislative Governor of Bengal.(Page) The Legislative Governor was
additionally approved by section 9 of the Act to broaden any arrangement of this Act with accidental changes to Khasi
and Jaintia Hills. By a warning the Legislative-Governor broadened every one of the arrangements of the Act to the
locale of Khasi and Jaintia Hills.(Great Britain: Parliament: House of Lords: Select Committee on the Constitution) One
Burah was gone after for homicide by the magistrate of Khasi and Jaintia Hills and was condemned to
death.(Secretariat and Commonwealth Secretariat) The Calcutta High Court pronounced area 9 as unlawful
appointment of authoritative power by the Indian governing body. The ground was that the Indian Legislature is an
agent of British Parliament, in this way, a representative can't further delegate.(Martinek) The Privy Council on offer
switched the choice of the Calcutta High Court and maintained the lawfulness of Section on the ground that it is just a
contingent enactment.(Pan and Reiss) The choice of the Privy Council was deciphered in two unique ways. (Vendrame)
(I) Indian governing body was not delegate of British Parliament; there is no restriction on the designation of
authoritative capacities.
(ii) Since Privy Council has approved just contingent enactment. Along these lines, assignment of administrative power
isn't allowable.
In this way, it didn't turn out to be certain whether undeniable assigned enactment was permitted or just contingent
enactment was permitted.

CRITICISM OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION

Delegated legislation is condemned for its different primary deformities which are as per the following:-
• It has been recommended that by permitting assigned enactment it has permitted to make and correct laws.(Walbert)
• It needs vote based system as an excessive amount of designated enactment is made by delegated individuals.
(Schütze)
• Delegated legislations liable to less Parliamentary examination than essential enactment. Parliament along these lines
has an absence of authority over assigned enactment and this can prompt irregularities in laws.(Tauschinsky and Weiß)
Appointed enactment along these lines can possibly be utilized in manners which Parliament had not foreseen when it
presented the power through the Act of Parliament.(Svrčinová and Janout)
• Delegated enactment is the absence of exposure encompassing it. At the point when law is made by statutory
instrument the open are not regularly told of it while with Acts of Parliament, then again, they are generally
publicized.(Fraser et al.)One explanation behind the absence of exposure encompassing assigned enactment is a direct
result of the volume of appointed enactment made and this outcome in the open not being educated regarding the
progressions to law. There has additionally been concern communicated that an excess of law is made through
appointed enactment.(Donnelly et al.)

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/568 582

[Link]
 ISSN (Online) 2581-9429
IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal
Impact Factor: 7.53 Volume 4, Issue 4, March 2024

TYPES OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION

1. Power to bring an Act into operation eq: on rule date on the Govt. by notification in the Gazette. Example: on such
date as the government by notification in the gazette because govt. has better knowledge of the practical exigencies of
bringing the law into force.(Merks et al.) The Court Cannot Ask the Govt. to bring the law into force. It was held in
A.K. Roy. v. UOI AIR 1982 SC 710 where the constitution of the Advisory Board was in question and the term
qualified to be a High Court judge changed to actual or had been a High Court judge.(Ross et al.) National Security Act.
1980 did not have this provision it was held by the that the court cannot ask the Govt. to implement.(Goetz et al.)
(II) Conditional Legislation : - The legislation make the law but leaves it to the executive to bring the act into operation
when conditions demanding such operation are obtained.
to bring an enactment into operation
To extend the application of any act in force in one territory.
(c) To extend or to except from the operation of an Act certain categories of subjects or territories.

DOCTRINES TO CHECK LAWS MADE UNDER DELEGATED LEGISLATION

DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATION
This doctrine literally means “what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly”. This doctrine checks the
jurisdiction of states in making a law under delegated legislation. Case law: Bihar land reforms act. In this case, the
state of Bihar enacted a law Bihar land reforms act ordering the goods vehicles to pay separate tax which passes
through the state. When the petitioner approached the court, the court held that the act made by Bihar state is invalid
since it falls under the doctrine of colourable legislation.

DOCTRINE OF PITH AND SUBSTANCE

The doctrine literally means true nature of law. This is doctrine applied to check the true nature of that provision made
by the state. Case law: F.N. BALSARA VS STATE OF BOMBAY. In this case, the state of Bombay made a law
restricting the storage and supply of liquor in the state of Bombay. The respondent F.n. Balsara filed a suit. When the
court interpreted the law made by Bombay was given validity. It was said that though the law made by state of Bombay
is beyond their power and falls under union list the law was made with the view of people welfare, the law made by
Bombay was given validity. The main aim of the paper is to study the history of delegated legislation.

OBJECTIVES
To study the delegated legislation and to study criticisms of delegated legislation and to study the history of delegated
legislation.

III. REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Delegated Legislation reduces the burden of already overburdened Legislature by enabling the executive to make or
alter the law under the authority of Legislature. Thus, this helps the Legislature to concentrate on more important
matters and frame policies regarding [Link] allows the law to be made by those who have the required knowledge and
experience. For instance, a local authority can be permitted to enact laws with respect to their locality taking into
account the local needs instead of making law across the board which may not suit their particular [Link] process of
delegated legislation also plays a significant role in an emergency situation since there is no need to wait for particular
Act to be passed through Parliament to resolve the particular [Link], delegated legislation often covers those
situations which have not been anticipated by the Parliament during the time of enacting legislation, which makes it
flexible and very useful to law-making. Delegated legislation is, therefore, able to meet the changing needs of society
and also situations which Parliament had not anticipated when they enacted the Act of [Link] is argued that
delegated legislation enables authorities other than Legislation to make and amend laws thus resulting in overlapping of
[Link] against the spirit of democracy as too much-delegated legislation is made by unelected [Link]
legislation subject to less Parliamentary scrutiny than primary legislation. Parliament, therefore, has a lack of control
over delegated legislation, and this can lead to inconsistencies in laws. Delegated legislation, therefore, has the potential
to be used in ways which Parliament had not anticipated when it conferred the power through the Act of
Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/568 583
[Link]
 ISSN (Online) 2581-9429
IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal
Impact Factor: 7.53 Volume 4, Issue 4, March 2024

[Link] legislation generally suffers from a lack of publicity. Since the law made by a statutory authority
not notified to the public. On the other hand, the laws of the Parliament are widely publicised. The reason behind the
lack of publicity is the large extent of legislation that is being delegated. There has also been concern expressed that too
much law is made through delegated [Link] legislation (sometimes referred to as secondary legislation or
subordinate legislation or subsidiary legislation) is a process by which the executive authority is given powers by
primary legislation to make laws in order to implement and administer the requirements of that primary legislation.
Such law is the law made by a person or body other than the legislature but with the legislature’s [Link]
by any statutory authority or local or other body other than the Legislature but under the authority of the competent
legislature is called Delegated legislation. It is legislation made by a person or body other than Parliament. Parliament
thereby, through primary legislation, enables others to make laws and rules through a process of delegated
[Link] Constitution of Indian empowers Legislature to make laws for the country. One of the significant
legislative functions is to determine a legislative policy and to frame it as a rule of conduct. Obviously such powers
cannot be conferred on other institutions. But keeping in mind various multifarious activities of a welfare State, it is not
possible for the legislature to perform all the functions. In such situation, the delegated legislation comes into the
picture. Delegated Legislature is one of the essential elements of administration whereby the executive has to perform
certain legislative functions. However, one must not forget the risk associated with the process of delegation. Very
often, an overburdened Legislature may unduly exceed the limits of delegation. It may not lay down any policy; may
declare any of its policy as vague and may set down any guidelines for the executive thereby conferring wide discretion
to the executive to change or modify any policy framed by it without reserving for itself any control over subordinate
legislation. Therefore, even though the Legislature can delegate some of its functions, it must not lose its control
completely over such functions.

IV. MATERIALS AND METHODS

TYPE OF RESEARCH
Empirical type of research. This paper used both primary and secondary information which are collected from the
general public through.
SAMPLING METHOD
Simple random sampling method.
SAMPLE SIZE
The number of samples taken are 1500 .
DEPENDENT VARIABLES
The dependent variables are
Do you think delegated legislation saves the time of parliament.
Are you aware of delegated legislation.
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE
The independent variable is *gender.
STATISTICS
The analysis of the survey is done by using chi-square and percentage analysis.

V. DATA ANALYSIS
FREQUENCY TABLE
2. Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid FEMALE 855 57.0 57.0 57.0
MALE 582 38.8 38.8 95.8
PREFER NOT TO SAY 63 4.2 4.2 100.0
Total 1500 100.0 100.0

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/568 584

[Link]
 ISSN (Online) 2581-9429
IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal
Impact Factor: 7.53 Volume 4, Issue 4, March 2024

From the above table it is clear that the Gender group of Female are with frequency 855 out of 1500 and percent 57.0
out of 100 and valid percent 57.0 out of 100 and cumulative percent 57.0. The Gender group of Male are with
frequency 582 out of 1500 and percent 38.8 out of 100 and valid percent 38.8 out of 100 and cumulative percent 95.8.
The People who prefer not to say with frequency 63 out of 1500 and percent 4.2 out of 100 and valid percent 4.2 out of
100 and cumulative percent 100.0.
[Link] you 1 of delegated legislation?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid YES 689 45.9 45.9 45.9
NO 811 54.1 54.1 100.0
Total 1500 100.0 100.0

From the above table it is clear that the people answered “Yes” are with frequency 689 out of 1500 and percent 45.9 out
of 100 and valid percent 45.9 out of 100 and cumulative percent 45.9 . The people answered “No” are with frequency
811 out of 1500 and percent 54.1 out of 100 and valid percent 54.1 out of 100 and cumulative percent 100.0.

16. Do you 1 that there are certain disadvantages for delegated legislation?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid YES 655 43.7 43.7 43.7
NO 650 43.3 43.3 87.0
MAYBE 195 13.0 13.0 100.0
Total 1500 100.0 100.0

From the above table it is clear that the people answered “Yes” are with frequency 655 out of 1500 and percent 43.7 out
of 100 and valid percent 43.7 out of 100 and cumulative percent 43.7 . The people answered “No” are with frequency
650 out of 1500 and percent 43.3 out of 100 and valid percent 43.3 out of 100 and cumulative percent 87.0. The people
answered “Maybe” are with frequency 195 out of 1500 and percent 13.0 out of 100 and valid percent 13.0 out of 100
and cumulative percent 100.0.

HYPOTHESIS
NULL HYPOTHESIS
There is no significant in the relation between independent variable gender and dependent variable with the statement
that are you aware of delegated legislation.
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS
There is significant in the relation between independent variable gender and dependent variable with the statement that
are you aware of delegated legislation.

2. Gender *
[Link] you 1 of delegated legislation?
Crosstab
Count
[Link] you 1 of delegated legislation?
YES NO Total
2. Gender FEMALE 432 423 855
MALE 219 363 582
PREFER NOT TO SAY 38 25 63
Total 689 811 1500

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/568 585

[Link]
 ISSN (Online) 2581-9429
IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal
Impact Factor: 7.53 Volume 4, Issue 4, March 2024

From the above table it is understood that male among 855 432 said aware and 423 said that they unaware about
delegated legislation. Female among 582 219 were aware and 363 were unaware about delegated legislation and prefer
not to say among 63 38 were aware and 25 were unaware about delegated legislation.
Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 28.673a 2 .000
Likelihood Ratio 28.865 2 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 7.346 1 .007
N of Valid Cases 1500
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28.94.
From the above table it is understood that the null hypothesis is accepted and alternate hypothesis is rejected.

HYPOTHESIS
NULL HYPOTHESIS
There is no significant in the relation between independent variable gender and dependent variable with the statement
that do you know that there are certain disadvantages for delegated legislation.
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS
There is significant in the relation between independent variable gender and dependent variable with the statement that
there are certain disadvantages for the delegated legislation.

2. Gender *
16. Do you 1 that there are certain disadvantages for delegated legislation?
Crosstab
Count
16. Do you 1 that there are certain disadvantages for
delegated legislation?
YES NO MAYBE Total
2. Gender FEMALE 438 342 75 855
MALE 200 285 97 582
PREFER NOT TO SAY 17 23 23 63
Total 655 650 195 1500
From the above table it is understood that female among 855 438 said there are certain disadvantages for delegated
legislation and 342 said that there are no disadvantages in delegated legislation and 75 said that there may be certain
disadvantages in delegated legislation. Male among 582 200 said that there are disadvantages in delegated legislation
and 285 said there are no disadvantages in delegated legislation and 97 said that there maybe certain disadvantages in
delegated legislation. Prefer not to say among 63 17 said that there are disadvantages in delegated legislation and 23
said that there are no disadvantages in delegated legislation and 12 said that there may be certain disadvantages in
delegated legislation.
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 78.436a 4 .000
Likelihood Ratio 71.457 4 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 67.289 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 1500
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.19.
From the above table it is understood that the null hypothesis is accepted and alternate hypothesis is rejected.
Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/568 586
[Link]
 ISSN (Online) 2581-9429
IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal
Impact Factor: 7.53 Volume 4, Issue 4, March 2024

VI. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

Delegated or subordinate legislation means principles of law made under the expert of an Act of Parliament. In spite of
the fact that law making is the capacity of lawmaking body, it might, by a rule, delegate its capacity to different bodies
or people. The resolution which delegates such power is known as Enabling Act. By Enabling Act the assembly, sets
out the wide rules and nitty gritty principles are authorized by the appointed expert. Appointed enactment is allowed by
the Indian Constitution. It exists in type of bye rules, guidelines, orders, bye laws and so on. There are numerous
components in charge of its expansion: Parliament and State Legislature are too occupied to even think about dealing
with the expanding mass of enactments, which are important to direct day by day issues. Present day enactment requires
detail and aptitude information of issues of different fields, our lawmakers, who are government officials are not
expected to have such learning. Subordinate enactments are increasingly adaptable, rapidly and effectively amendable
and revocable than normal enactment, if there should be an occurrence of disappointment or deformity in its
application. At the point when possibilities emerge which were not foreseeable at the time of making it, subordinate
enactment can pass a demonstration rapidly to deal with them. Speedy, powerful and private choices are impractical in
group of legislatives. Along these lines, officials are designated with capacity to make standards to manage such
circumstances. These are the principle factors, other than numerous others, for the quick increment in assigned
enactment today. Equity P B Mukerjee has expressed "Designated enactment is an articulation which covers a huge
number of disarray. It is a reason for the officials, a shield for the executives and an incitement to the sacred legal
advisers. It is applauded as a need and felt as unavoidable in our reality where social monetary innovative mental and
regulatory speed exceeds the extensive and tranquil conventional authoritative beliefs and procedures. It is censured as
an abandonment of intensity by lawmakers and a getaway from the obligation forced on them by voters of majority
rules system. In England the ruler lost the administrative power at Runnymede and parliament lost authoritative at rush
that pursued since to give the legislature to the nation through organization and administration.

REFERENCES
[1]. Bharadvaja, Brahma. Delegated Legislation in India. Meerut : Meenakshi Prakashan, 1975.
[2]. Carr, Cecil T. Delegated Legislation. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
[3]. Chen, Chih-Mai. Parliamentary Opinion of Delegated Legislation. 1933, doi:10.7312/chen92244.
[4]. Clements, Richard. “11. Administrative Law: Ombudsmen, Tribunals, and Delegated Legislation.” Law
Trove, 2018, doi:10.1093/he/9780198819912.003.0011.
[5]. Donnelly, Sarah, et al. “How Are People with Dementia Involved in Care-Planning and Decision-Making?
An Irish Social Work Perspective.” Dementia , Jan. 2018, p. 1471301218763180.
[6]. Elliott, Mark, and Jason Varuhas. “16. Delegated Legislation.” Law Trove, 2017,
doi:10.1093/he/9780198719465.003.0016.
[7]. Fraser, Alan G., et al. “The Need for Transparency of Clinical Evidence for Medical Devices in Europe.” The
Lancet, vol. 392, no. 10146, Aug. 2018, pp. 521–30.
[8]. Goetz, Katja, et al. “At the Dawn of Delegation? Experiences and Attitudes of General Practitioners in
Germany - a Questionnaire Survey.” BMC Family Practice, vol. 18, no. 1, Dec. 2017, p. 102.
[9]. Great Britain: Parliament: House of Lords: Select Committee on the Constitution. HLP 116 - Delegated
Legislation and Parliament: A Response to the Strathclyde Review. The Stationery Office, 2016.
[10]. Hewitt, Desmond J. The Control of Delegated Legislation: Being a Study of the Doctrine of Ultra Vires in
Relation to the Legislative Powers of the Executive Government, with Special Reference to Great Britain,
Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Sydney : Butterworth, 1953.
[11]. “III. Parliamentary Criticisms of Delegated Legislation.” Parliamentary Opinion of Delegated Legislation,
1933, pp. 68–89, doi:10.7312/chen92244-003.
[12]. Martinek, Madeleine. Experimental Legislation in China between Efficiency and Legality: The Delegated
Legislative Power of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone. Springer, 2019.
[13]. Merks, Piotr, et al. “The European Falsified Medicines Directive in Poland: Background, Implementation and
Potential Recommendations for Pharmacists.” European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. Science and
Practice, vol. 25, no. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 10–15.
Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/568 587
[Link]
 ISSN (Online) 2581-9429
IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal
Impact Factor: 7.53 Volume 4, Issue 4, March 2024

[14]. Mitchell, R. Else, and R. Else Mitchell. “DELEGATED AND SUB-DELEGATED LEGISLATION.”
Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 4, no. 7, 1943, pp. 298–307, doi:10.1111/j.1467-
8500.1943.tb02389.x.
[15]. Page, Edward. Governing by Numbers: Delegated Legislation and Everyday Policy-Making. Hart Publishing,
2001.
[16]. Pan, Richard J., and Dorit Rubinstein Reiss. “Vaccine Medical Exemptions Are a Delegated Public Health
Authority.” Pediatrics, vol. 142, no. 5, Nov. 2018, doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2009.
[17]. Pearce, Dennis Charles. Delegated Legislation in Australia and New Zealand. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1977.
[18]. Pemberton, John E. “Delegated Legislation and Administrative Tribunals.” British Official Publications,
1973, pp. 146–59, doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-017797-7.50015-2.
[19]. Ross, Hana, et al. “Why Governments Cannot Afford Codentify to Support Their Track and Trace Solutions.”
Tobacco Control, vol. 27, no. 6, Nov. 2018, pp. 706–08.
[20]. Schütze, Robert. “‘Delegated’ Legislation in the (new) European Union: A Constitutional Analysis.” The
Modern Law Review, vol. 74, no. 5, 2011, pp. 661–93, doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00866.x.
[21]. Secretariat, Commonwealth, and Commonwealth Secretariat. Delegated Powers to Make Legislation. 2017,
doi:10.14217/9781848599635-18-en.
[22]. Svrčinová, Pavla, and Vladimír Janout. “Comparison of Official Food Safety Control Systems in Member
States of the European Union.” Central European Journal of Public Health, vol. 26, no. 4, Dec. 2018, pp.
321–25.
[23]. Tamil Nadu (India). Legislature. Legislative Assembly. Committee on Delegated Legislation. Report. 1974.
[24]. Tauschinsky, Eljalill, and Wolfgang Weiß. The Legislative Choice Between Delegated and Implementing
Acts in EU Law: Walking a Labyrinth. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
[25]. Vendrame, Alan. “When Evidence Is Not Enough: A Case Study on Alcohol Marketing Legislation in
Brazil.” Addiction , vol. 112 Suppl 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 81–85.
[26]. Walbert, Helmut. “[Calculating all delegated services according to GOÄ].” MMW Fortschritte der Medizin,
vol. 158, no. 2, Feb. 2016, p. 27.

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/568 588

[Link]