0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views6 pages

Data Collection Methods

The document outlines various data collection methods, focusing on questionnaires and interviews. It details the advantages and disadvantages of each method, emphasizing the importance of design in questionnaires and the depth of information that interviews can provide. Additionally, it highlights the challenges associated with both methods, such as response bias and limited generalizability.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views6 pages

Data Collection Methods

The document outlines various data collection methods, focusing on questionnaires and interviews. It details the advantages and disadvantages of each method, emphasizing the importance of design in questionnaires and the depth of information that interviews can provide. Additionally, it highlights the challenges associated with both methods, such as response bias and limited generalizability.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Data collection methods

-Questionnaire

-interview

-environmental quality survey

1. Questionnaire

Primary data

It is a set of pre- designed questions used to gather data from a selected sample of respondents

It involves people’s opinions, attitudes, experiences and behaviours related to specific Geographical
topics.

It gathers first hand information that is relevant to the investigation.

What makes a good questionnaire

 It has an introduction, containing all the information about who is asking questions
 Includes thank you at the end
 Simple vocabulary: Use easy-to-understand language.
 Avoid jargon: Avoid technical terms or specialized language.
 Clear instructions: Provide clear instructions on how to complete the questionnaire.
 Aligned with research objectives: Questions should be relevant to the research goals.
 Specific and well-defined: Questions should be specific and well-defined.
 Avoid unnecessary questions: Only ask questions that are necessary for the research.
 Avoid leading questions: Questions should not influence respondents' answers.
 Avoid biased language: Language should be neutral and unbiased.
 Avoid double-barreled questions: Ask one question at a time.

Advantages

1. Cost-effective: Questionnaires can be distributed to a large number of people at a relatively low


cost.

2. Time-efficient: Questionnaires can be completed quickly, and responses can be collected and
analyzed efficiently.

3. Wide reach: Questionnaires can be distributed to a large and geographically diverse population.

4. Anonymity: Respondents can remain anonymous, which can encourage honest responses.

5. Standardization: Questionnaires can ensure that all respondents are asked the same questions in
the same way.

Disadvantages

1. Limited depth: Questionnaires may not allow for in-depth response

2. Response bias: Respondents may not answer questions truthfully or accurately.


3. Low response rate: Some people may not respond to the questionnaire, which can lead to biased
results.

4. Lack of context: Questionnaires may not provide enough context for respondents to fully
understand the questions.

5. Difficulty in clarifying responses: It can be challenging to clarify or follow up on responses, which


can lead to misunderstandings.

Carrying out a questionnaire

Questionnaire makes use of close and open ended questions


Advantages and disadvantages of open ended and closed questions

2. interview

An interview is a conversation between two or more people, where one person, the interviewer,
asks questions to gather information, insights, or opinions from the other person, the interviewee.

Advantages

Detailed information: Interviews can provide rich, detailed information about the interviewee's
thoughts, feelings, and experiences.

Nuanced understanding: Interviews can help to gain a deeper understanding of complex issues.

Adaptable: Interviews can be adapted to various contexts and purposes.

Follow-up questions: Interviews allow for follow-up questions to clarify or probe further.

Building rapport: Interviews can establish a personal connection between the interviewer and
interviewee.
Trust and openness: Interviews can foster trust and openness, leading to more honest and revealing
responses.

Contextual information: Interviews can provide contextual information about the interviewee's
experiences and perspectives.

Nonverbal cues: Interviews

can pick up on nonverbal cues, such as body language and tone of voice.

Disadvantages

Personal biases: Interviewers may bring their own biases and prejudices to the interview.

Leading questions: Interviewers may ask leading questions that influence the interviewee's
responses.

Small sample size: Interviews often involve a small sample size, which may not be representative of
the larger population.

Limited generalizability: Findings from interviews may not be generalizable to other contexts or
populations.

Interpretation bias: Interviewers may interpret responses subjectively, which can lead to biased
conclusions.

Data analysis challenges: Analyzing interview data can be challenging, especially when dealing with
large amounts of qualitative data.

Social desirability bias: Interviewees may respond in a way that is socially desirable, rather than
truthfully.

Lack of honesty: Interviewees may not always respond honestly, especially if the topic is sensitive or
personal.

Cost: Conducting interviews can be resource-intensive, especially if travel or equipment is required.

Training: Interviewers may require training to conduct effective interviews.


Environmental Quality Survey

You might also like