GS FORM 4 – PC_OD PANEL’S COMMENT ON THESIS / DISSERTATION FINAL DEFENSE
STUDENT INFORMATION DEFENSE INFORMATION
LAST NAME ND
MARAMOT AY / TERM / SEMESTER 2
FIRST NAME
JHONEL DATE MAY 09, 2025
MIDDLE NAME
MAMACLAY TIME 1:00 PM
ID NUMBER
46218 VENUE GS CONFERENCE ROOM
PROGRAM ☐PROPOSAL ☒FINAL
MASTER IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
THESIS / DISSERTATION TITLE
Extent of Human Relations in the Workplace and the Employee’s Level of Work Engagement and Productivity
COMMENTS AND ACTIONS PAGE REMARKS
SUGGESTIONS (STUDENT) (STUDENT) (STUDENT)
1. On page 4, mention in the introduction part the actual Modified 4 Satisfactorily
score versus the ideal one complied with
2. On pages 5 and 6, avoid conclusive statements Modified 5-6 Satisfactorily
complied with
3. Improve the thesis statement in the last part of the Improved 6 Satisfactorily
introduction complied with
4. In the theoretical framework, review the theories Modified 10 Satisfactorily
presented and relate them to the current study complied with
5. Provide an introductory paragraph in the conceptual Modified 10-11 Satisfactorily
framework complied with
6. Observe the proper tenses of the verb in the statement Modified 13 Satisfactorily
of the problem complied with
7. Follow the format in presenting the beneficiaries (in Modified 14-15 Satisfactorily
the significance of the study) complied with
8. Improve the discussion of the scope, limitation, and Improved 16 Satisfactorily
delimitation. Clearly draw the line between scope, complied with
limitation, and delimitation
9. On page 16, specify who the participants are Modified 16 Satisfactorily
complied with
10. In the definition of terms, follow the institutional Modified 16-18 Satisfactorily
format. Include a definition of output, the definition complied with
of work engagement, and the other variables included
in the study
11. Improve the synthesis of the literature review. Improved 46-48 Satisfactorily
Highlight the emergent gaps and patterns. Balance the complied with
inclusion of the presentation of the review of
literature.
12. In Chapter 3, under the research instrument, improve Improved 51 Satisfactorily
the discussion of the questionnaire complied with
13. For the entire paper, observe academic writing (ensure Modified all Satisfactorily
formality in writing) complied with
14. On page 59, improve the discussion focusing on the Improved 55 Satisfactorily
last part of the data gathering procedure complied with
15. For ethical consideration, improve the discussion and Improved 56 Satisfactorily
including other ethical principles. complied with
16. Chapter 4 - highlight the lowest and highest points of Modified 57-79 Satisfactorily
the results complied with
17. Make sure that the implications are discussed and Modified 57-79 Satisfactorily
connect the findings to the relevant theories. Include complied with
in the discussion the justification for how the theories
support the findings
18. On page 80, follow the institutional format Modified 76 Satisfactorily
complied with
19. In the summary of findings, revise the presentation (it Modified 83-84 Satisfactorily
should be a recap of the results) complied with
20. Restate the conclusions Modified 84-85 Satisfactorily
complied with
21. Findings, and conclusions should be parallel. Modified 83-85 Satisfactorily
complied with
22. The recommendations should be based on the key Improved 85-87 Satisfactorily
findings of the study. complied with
23. The recommendations should be practical and doable Improved 85-87 Satisfactorily
(who will take the action, what action is proposed, and complied with
why)
24. Include specific activities in the content of the output. Modified 80-82 Satisfactorily
It should be original. Consider a work and financial complied with
plan as an addition to support the action plan. Provide
a specific objective for the output.
25. Remove parts in the paper that are not part of the Deleted all Satisfactorily
scope of the study. complied with
26. Attach a grammarian and proofreading certificate. Inserted 125 Satisfactorily
complied with
Name Signature Date
THESIS ADVISER (Checked the inclusion of comments and suggestions)
DR. CHRISTIAN ANTHONY C. AGUTAYA
PANEL MEMBER
ROMEL CARANDANG, MAEd
PANEL MEMBER
DON ZIAN ENCARNACION
PANEL MEMBER
SHYNIE VEE TELMO, Ph.D.
CHAIRMAN
GLEACEL HERNANDEZ, Ph.D.
PROGRAM COORDINATOR: (SI_____/institutional format)
DR. MARIA ANGIE S. CUBILLAS, LPT
GRADUATE SCHOOL DEAN
DR. ALELI C. DUGAN, CPA
