DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

WDFC PHASE-1
COMBINED PACKAGE
CTP-1 AND CTP-2

GEOTECHNICAL INTERPRETATIVE REPORT

FOR IR/DFC MAJOR BRIDGE NO. 379
AT IR/DFC CHAINAGE 313.2-3/40244,
DFC SECTION 12

Document No.
DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208

0 19.11.2014 Sneha Ashish

Jayanth Gupta J. Rastogi
Designer
L&T Name Sign Name Sign Name Sign
Ramboll Rev Date
Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by

Sign:

Chief Bridge Design Engineer

Name & Designation
(Samit Shrivastava)
 PREFACE
Submitted herewith is the Geotechnical Interpretative Report for Major Bridge Structure at

IR/DFC Chainage 313.2-3/40244, DFC Section 12 for the project

“Design and construction of combined package CTP-1 & CTP-2 for Rewari to Iqbalgarh section for

Western Dedicated Freight Corridor”.

This Geotechnical Interpretative Report No. DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208 is submitted as per Cl.

1.3.8(6) pg. 743- Appendix 14, Part-2 of Contract Agreement for review of Engineer. The report also

includes information collected from the geotechnical investigation, like boring / drilling log with soil

profile, reduced level, SPT-N values along with sampling details for laboratory tests and depth of

water table. This report is submitted for the review of the Engineer, as per Cl. 15.4(4) of Employers’

Requirement Design Part-2 of contract document.

 Contents
1 Introduction 2
1.1 Project Description 2
1.2 Scope of Report 3
1.3 Objectives of Report 3
1.4 Limitations of Report 3
1.5 Available Information 4

2 Site Description 5
2.1 Location and Description 5
2.2 Regional Geology 5
2.3 Seismicity 7

3 Ground Investigation 8
3.1 Scope 8
3.2 Field Testing 8
3.3 Laboratory Testing 8

4 Design Methodology 9
4.1 General 9
4.2 Foundation Assessment 9
4.3 Design Parameters 11

5 Foundation Design Summary 13

5.1 General 13
5.2 Foundation Design 13

References 15

Annexure 17

Annexure 1 (Sub-soil Profile)

Annexure 2 (Computations)

Annexure 3 (Field Logs and Lab Test Results)

Annexure 4 (General Arrangement Drawing)

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

1 Introduction

1.1 Project Description

Ministry of Railways (MOR), Government of India has planned to construct a
High Axle Load Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) covering about 3325 km on
two Corridors, one on Western part and the other on eastern part of India. The
Western Corridor extends from Jawaharlal Nehru Port, Mumbai to Tughlakabad/
Dadri near Delhi. The construction of this 1483 km long corridor (JNPT –
Ahmadabad – Palanpur – Rewari – Asaoti - Dadri) is planned to be implemented
in two phases (Figure 1.1), the first phase encompassing 935 km stretch between
Vadodara and Rewari. The project entails the assemblage of double-track
electrified railway lines capable of handling 32.5 ton axle load, longer trains and
double stack containers. The bridges and other structures along the corridor will be
designed to allow movement of 32.5 ton axle load while the rail tracks connecting
structures will be designed for 25 ton axle load operating at maximum train speed
of up to 100 km/hr.

Aaaa MJB 379

Figure 1.1 Western Dedicated Freight Corridor

Construction of the 1st phase of the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (WDFC)
has been planned through eight contract packages encompassing following four
civil work packages:

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 2
 1. CTP-1 Civil/Building/Track Works Rewari – Ajmer Section;

2. CTP-2 Civil/Building/Track Works Ajmer – Iqbalgarh Section;

3. CTP-3 Civil/Building/Track Works Iqbalgarh – Vadodara Section (excluding

bridges across river Mahi and Sabarmati);

4. CTP-3A Special Steel Bridges across river Mahi and Sabarmati;

Sojitz-L&T Consortium has been awarded with CTP-1 & CTP-2 on Design &
Build lumpsum price basis. With total length of 660 km the combined package
CTP-1 & CTP-2 includes 1340 structures. This combined package is further
divided into three design packages, DP-1, DP-2 & DP-3.

The scope of Sojitz-L&T’s detailed design consultant for 145 structures in DP-2 is
the basis of this report. Out of 145 structures, 96 major structures require detailed
foundation design. These major structures include Important bridges (linear waterway
> 300 m), major bridges (linear waterway > 18 m OR clear opening > 12 m), Road
Over rail Bridge (ROB), Railway Fly Over (RFO), Viaducts and minor bridges and Road
Under rail Bridges (RUB) with clear span > 6 m.

1.2 Scope of Report

This report sets out the Geotechnical design of the structure foundations for major
bridge no. 379 based on the ground investigation information provided by L&T.

1.3 Objectives of Report

The main objectives of this report are as follows:

 Summarize the findings from the existing ground investigation data,

providing an initial interpretation of the ground and groundwater
conditions.
 Provide geotechnical parameters for bearing capacity and settlement
estimation.
 Present design criteria for detailed geotechnical design.
 Provide recommendations for abutment/pier/structure specific
foundation designs (as applicable).

1.4 Limitations of Report

This report is based on the information from ground investigation data and details
of proposed structures that has been made available to Consultant. The
conclusions drawn in this report are considered correct although any subsequent
additional information may allow refinement of the conclusions. It should be
noted that:

 The findings and opinions conveyed in this report are based on

information obtained from a variety of sources as detailed within this
report, and which Consultant believes are reliable. Nevertheless,

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 3
 Consultant cannot and does not guarantee the authenticity or reliability of
the referenced information.
 The opinions presented in this report are based on findings derived from a
review of records. Consultant has found indicators that suggest the likely
existence of geotechnical hazards along the route which warrants
mitigation or consideration appropriate to the end use.
 An assessment of geotechnical hazards that could impact the design
process and in turn construction aspects has been made using the available
data and information. These identified hazards, associated risks and its
potential impact on design and construction along with proposed
mitigation measures are presented in a separate Geotechnical Risk Register
prepared for the entire project. It is expected that Contractor shall take
appropriate measures to avoid or mitigate the risks associated with the
identified hazards.

1.5 Available Information

The following sources of information were available for preparation of this report:

 L&T Construction – Infrastructure (2013), Factual Report on Ground

Investigation (field logs and laboratory test results)

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 4
2 Site Description

2.1 Location and Description

The project site under DP-2 starts from Indian Railways (IR) chainage 272.810
(near Kishangarh, Distt. Ajmer, Rajasthan) and extends up to IR chainage 631.000
(near Iqbalgarh, Distt. Banaskantha, Gujarat). The 358.19 km long route travels
from two different states (Rajasthan and Gujarat) with varying topographical,
geographical and geological features along it.

Situated in the foothills of Aravalli mountain range, a large variation in ground

elevation has been noted. The topography of the site is dominated by rocky and
hilly terrain. The route crosses number of rivers, natural streams, existing roads
and existing IR tracks. All of this calls for construction of various structures along
the proposed WDFC route such as cross-drainage structures (bridges and
culverts), grade-separators (railway flyovers, ROB and underpasses) as well as
viaducts.

The site of major bridge no. 379 is situated between Makrera and Sardhana
stations in the state of Rajasthan. The distance between existing IR bridge and the
proposed DFC bridge is about 41.5 m. This bridge is proposed to cross a local
stream. The site was observed to be dry location when visited in the month of
November 2013.

Figure 2.1 Site of MJB 379 near existing IR Bridge

2.2 Regional Geology

Geologically the site of DP-2 is part of the Delhi and Aravalli systems and it can
be further divided into several groups and formations.

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 5
 The rocks in Ajmer region occur from Deyi in the north-east through Kishangarh
to Sarwar area, underlying the marwar plains and comprises meta-sedimentary
sequences with associated magmatic complex and igneous rocks. The main Aravalli
range extending from Rupnagar in north to Todgarh in south is occupied by the
rocks of Delhi Supergroup which comprises calcareous, argillacious and
arenaceous meta-sedimentary sequences with associated basic volcanics and
igneous rocks. The rocks of this region have been complexly folded and faulted,
metamorphosed and magmatised during orogenic episodes related to different
geological cycles. The geological sequence in Ajmer region as worked out by
Geological Survey of India is shown as under.

Erinpura granites
Sendra Ambaji granite gneisses
Post Delhi Intrusives Kishangarh syenite
Phulad ophiolite suit

Barr Formation Ajab Ajmer

Kumbhal Kotra Formation garh For-
SuperGroup

garh Beawar Group mation

Delhi

Group Formation
Sendra Formation
Todgarh
Formation
Gogunda Kelwara Alwar Nau-
Group Formation Group lakha
Antalia For-
Formation mation
Sri-
nagar
For-
mation
Intrusive
Bhilwara Super Group

Sawar Group Morhi Formation

Giyan Asind Rajpur-jalayan Mafic

Acid Rocks Rocks

Mangalwar Sandmata Complex

Complex Kekri Banranch formation
Formation

The geology of site towards and within Gujarat end is dominated by quartzites,
phyllites and schists. Quartzites being hard and resistant to weathering action, form
steep narrow ridges with serrated tops arranged along the strike, while valleys and
plains are occupied by phyllites and schists, these being soft. Granites typically
form low to high hills with loose boulders of large dimensions standing insitu; thus
granite country can easily be recognized from a distance. The region also falls
under Archaeans group and indicates old age of the formations. Archaeans are the
oldest groups of rocks forming the basement for later formations. They are

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 6
 mineral bearing and thus have importance from the point of view of potential
wealth. The major formations under this group in this region are: Banded Gneissic
complex rocks, which are of highly intricate and varied gneissic complex; they are
mostly of igneous origin, but on account of interfoliar injection, they have a
general northerly foliation strike, and are continuous with gneissic complex of
Central Mewar. Rocks of Aravalli and Delhi systems such as Erinpura granite is
also common in this region.

The geological observations at MJB 379 indicate the presence of metamorphic

mica-schist rock.

2.3 Seismicity
Seismic hazard levels in India are defined in IS 1893 (2002), Part 1, which classifies
India into four distinct seismic zones (Figure 2.2). In accordance with IS 1893 the
DP-2 site can be classified in Zone II (towards Rajasthan side) and Zone III
(towards Gujarat side), i.e. a low to moderate seismic intensity zone. Zone II
corresponds to a Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), or Z factor, of 0.1g for
seismic design, while Zone III corresponds to 0.16g as the zone factor of the
PGA. The site for MJB 379 falls in Zone II.

Figure 2.2 Seismic Zoning of India (Source: IS 1893, 2002)

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 7
3 Ground Investigation

3.1 Scope
Ground investigation data in the form of boring & lithological logs and laboratory
test results were provided by L&T for review and preparation of this report. The
ground investigation was designed and supervised by L&T between September
2013 and February 2014. Drilling of four exploratory boreholes viz, BH-1 to BH-4
upto specified depth was carried out with sampling, locating water table, field and
lab testing as main activities. The locations of drilled boreholes with respect to
proposed DFC Bridge on WDFC alignment plan is shown in Annexure 1 (Sub-soil
profile).

3.2 Field Testing

Standard penetration tests (SPT) were performed along with split barrel sampling
(disturbed samples). SPT was conducted as per IS 2131 (1981). When rebound or
refusal was resulted during SPT attempt, the drilling bit was changed to TC
(tungsten carbide) or diamond and core recovery, RQD (rock quality designation)
both were measured.

The logs of boring and drilling with field observations are included in Annexure 3.

3.3 Laboratory Testing

Soil and rock laboratory testing was performed on selected (disturbed and
undisturbed) samples recovered during drilling of boreholes. Results from the
laboratory testing are included in Annexure 3. The laboratory testing comprised
the following:

Soil

 Particle size distribution

 Consistency Limits
 Bulk density and moisture content
 Specific gravity
 Direct Shear test
 Chemical analysis (pH, sulphate and chloride content)

Rock
 Density
 Porosity and water absorption
 Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS)
 Point load

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 8
4 Design Methodology

4.1 General
Geotechnical design of foundations for bridges is primarily based on IRS-2003.
However, other relevant guidelines and standards, such as BIS, FHWA and IRC
have been referred when IRS does not cover any design case. The results of the
ground investigation, field and laboratory testing work have been analyzed to
arrive at geotechnical design parameters.

4.2 Foundation Assessment

4.2.1 Ground conditions

Ground investigation at MJB 379 reveals the presence of 4.5 m to 6.0 m thick silty
sand deposit in medium dense to dense condition. These soil deposits overlay
completely weathered grade V rock followed by weathered grade III Mica-schist
rock. The weathering condition of this rock was found as highly and moderately
weathered up to the explored depth of 20.0 m. Total core recovery (CR) in grade V
and grade IV rock varied from 11% to 31% with RQD value ranging between 0%
and 22%. CR and RQD in grade III rock varied from 15% to 69% and 0% to 57%
respectively. The maximum depth of exploration was 20.0 m. It is evident that the
core recovery was poor and good quality cores were generally not recovered from
the rocky strata. Also, not much information was obtained for completely
weathered rock stratum (except refusal SPT). This material whose state and
behaviour neither resemble soil nor rock, is termed as intermediate geo material
(IGM) (refer IRC 78- amendment 68, FHWA (2006)).

4.2.2 Scour consideration

The maximum scour levels (MSL) have been referred from hydrology report
(refer- DOC/CTP2/DGN/BR/303). When the stratum below soil deposits is of
IGM and rocky nature, the scour levels based on soil silt factor cannot be extended
in such strata. Hence MSLs have been restricted at the top of IGM and rocky
strata. Computations of silt factor based on available grain size analysis results are
included in Annexure 2.

4.2.3 Depth of foundation

When the shallow foundation is resting in soil, a minimum foundation depth of

1.75 m below maximum scour level needs to be provided as per IRS 2003. In case
non-scourable bed (IGM or rock) governs the maximum scour level the minimum
embedment within such strata shall be 1.5 m. However when the foundation is
resting on rocks with UCS > 10 MPa, the minimum embedment shall reduce to
0.6 m. This approach is in line with IRC 78, 2000. At MJB 379, the founding level
for abutments and piers have been decided after review of existing IR bridge’s
founding level, i.e. 439.333 mRL. This gives deeper founding level than what can

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 9
 be arrived from analysis (i.e. MSL - 1.75 m). The recommended founding level for
all abutments and piers at MJB 379 is 438.833 mRL, i.e. 0.5 m below existing IR
bridge founding level.

4.2.4 Bearing Capacity

When no core recovery (CR) or core recovery of less than 35% was achieved from
the weathered rock strata below foundation, the bearing capacity estimation shall
be based on IS 6403 and IS 1904, i.e. treating it as soil deposit, as per IRS-2003.
The shear strength parameters (cohesion and angle of internal friction) adopted for
estimation of bearing capacity in such strata are considered to be zero kPa and 36o,
respectively, based on engineering judgment and to be on safe side. The detailed
computations are included in Annexure 2. When footings are resting in sandy
stratum, phi value is used after review of available direct shear test results within
that stratum. Refer Annexure 2 for detailed calculations.

4.2.5 Settlement

Estimation of settlement in cohesionless (sandy) strata is based on IS 8009 part 1

Figure 9. Settlement value (for 100 kPa bearing pressure) corresponding to average
SPT N (averaged up to a depth equal to 1.5 times the width of footing) is read
from Figure 9 in IS 8009 part 1. It is then multiplied to actual live load pressure
and then corrected for rigidity, depth and water table, as applicable.

The IGMs and rocks are stiff and strong enough that bearing capacity and
settlement considerations generally do not govern the design of spread footing
supported on such a material. As settlement estimate is necessary for shallow
foundations supported on an IGM or rock, a method based on elasticity theory is
probably the best approach (FHWA -2006), which uses following equation.

Where, δV : vertical settlement at surface

Cd : shape and rigidity factors ( given in Table 8-13 of FHWA-2006)
Δp : change in stress at top of rock surface due to applied footing load
Bf : footing width
ν : Poisson’s ratio
Em : Young’s modulus of rock mass

As per IRS-2003, the settlement shall not normally exceed 25 mm after the end of
the construction period for bridges with simply supported spans. Based on this,
the settlement due to design Live Load has been checked. Settlement
computations based on each borehole are presented in Annexure 2.

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 10
4.2.6 Groundwater

Groundwater table was not encountered in any borehole during its measurement
in the month of October 2013. For design purpose in this report, the ground water
table is considered at the ground surface to account for worst case scenario at the
water body crossing bridge.

4.3 Design Parameters

4.3.1 Unit weight

Unit weights of encountered deposits have been determined after review of the
test results when available or it is assigned based on engineering judgment and
published literature (e.g. Look G. Burt, 2007). Below table presents the unit
weights of deposits which are encountered at the three bridges.

Table 4.1 Design unit weights

Stratum Unit weight (γ) kN/m3
Medium Dense Sand 17
Dense Sand 18
Completely Weathered Rock 20
Highly Weathered Rock 21
Moderately Weathered Rock 22

4.3.2 Rock-Weathering

The following weathering grades of bedrock are considered when determining the
geotechnical design parameters:

Table 4.2 Summary of weathering grades

Degree of Weathering Grade
Completely weathered V
Highly weathered IV
Moderately weathered III

4.3.3 Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS)

Depending on the type of rock sample recovered from the borehole, i.e. a good
core of about 10 cm length or a smaller piece, either UCS or point load test was
conducted, respectively. It is noted that the variation of compressive strength
within one geological feature is significant. The results of UCS and point loads, as
available, are summarized in the below table. As per IS 8764-1998, Section 1.3, test
results with point load strength index less than 1 MPa are not reliable and hence
have been discarded.

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 11
 Table 4.3 Summary of UCS and Point Load Strength Indices
Point
Br BH- UCS Load
Depth (m) Rock
No. ID (MPa) Index
(MPa)
BH-1 13.00-14.00 Gr III Mica Schist - 3.23
BH-1 14.00-15.00 Gr III Mica Schist 30.52 -
BH-1 15.00-16.00 Gr III Mica Schist 35.62 -
BH-2 15.00-16.00 Gr III Mica Schist 9.66 -
379 BH-2 16.00-17.00 Gr III Mica Schist 14.49 -
BH-3 10.00-11.00 Gr IV Mica Schist - 2.14
BH-3 15.00-16.00 Gr IV Mica Schist 8.61 -
BH-3 17.00-18.00 Gr III Mica Schist 1.43 -
BH-4 11.20-12.00 Gr IV Mica Schist - 1.25

4.3.4 Deformation Modulus (E or Em)

No laboratory or field tests were conducted to determine the deformation modulus

in IGM or rock at MJB 379. Based on the review of the available data at all
locations and considering the variation in the test results, the deformation modulus
for IGMs, i.e. Completely weathered Gr V and Highly weathered Gr IV rocks with
CR<35% is taken as 60 MPa.

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 12
5 Foundation Design Summary

5.1 General
Geotechnical assessment suggests shallow foundations at all piers and abutments
at MJB 379.

5.2 Foundation Design

The shallow foundations will be checked against a minimum factor of safety of 2.5
in soil and 3 in rock and IGM. The sizes of isolated and combined footings are
referenced to General Arrangement Drawing (Annexure 4) whereas the pressure
on foundation and intensity of live loads on each foundation are provided by
structure engineer. Table 5.1 summarizes the allowable bearing pressure and
estimated settlement corresponding to post construction loading, i.e. live load
intensity, for shallow foundations at MJB 379. The detailed calculations are
provided in Annexure 2.

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 13
 Table 5.1 Foundation Design Summary for MJB 379
Maximum Allowable Live
Foundation Founding Depth of LL Foundation
Abutment/ BH BH GL Scour Stratum at Founding Bearing Load
Dimension Level footing Settlement Pressure
Pier No. (mRL) Level level Pressure Pressure
(m) (mRL) (m) (mm) (kN/m2)
(mRL) (kN/m2) (kPa)
Chainage: 313/2-3 ; Bridge No. 379 Major Bridge
A1 BH-4 13.5 x 8.05 445.000 442.653 438.833 6.17 CW Grade V Rock 340 28 4.0 318
P1, P2 BH-3 15.5 x 5.6 444.800 441.506 438.833 5.97 Dense sand 400 43 5.2 193
P3,P4,P5 BH-2 15.5 x 5.6 444.600 441.506 438.833 5.77 Dense sand 340 43 3.9 193
P6 BH-1 15.5 x 5.6 444.000 441.506 438.833 5.17 Dense sand 240 43 4.2 193
A2 BH-1 13.5 x 8.05 444.000 442.653 438.833 5.17 Dense sand 340 28 2.9 318
Note: The allowable bearing pressure for uniform design of piers shall be 240 kPa and that for abutments shall be 340 kPa.

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 14
References

1. L&T Construction – Infrastructure (2013), Factual Report on Ground Investigation (field logs
and laboratory test results).

2. Preliminary Design Manual -Bridges (2013), Doc. No. DOC/CTP 1&2/DGN/BR/0002, WDFC
Phase-1 Combined Package CTP-1 and CTP-2, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India
Limited.

3. Indian Railway Standard, Code of Practice for the Design of Sub-Structures and Foundations of
Bridges, Bridge Sub-Structures & Foundation Code, Government of India Ministry of Railway
(Railway Board), Issued by Research Designs and Standards Organization (RDSO), Lucknow,
2003.

4. Indian Standards, IRC 78-2000, Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges,
Section: VII Foundation and Substructure; and Notification no. 68, 2011 to IRC 78.

5. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1893, part 1 - 2002, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures-Part 1- General Provisions and Buildings, Fifth Revision.

6. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 8764- 1998, Method for Determination of Point Load Strength
Index of Rocks.

7. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 6403-1971, Code of Practice for Determination of Bearing

Capacity of Shallow foundations.

8. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1904-1986 (Reaffirmed 1995), Code of Practice for Design and
Construction of Foundations in Soils: General Requirements.

9. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 12070-1987 (Reaffirmed 2010), Code of Practice for Design and
Construction of Shallow foundations on Rock.

10. Dasgupta N., Pal T., Sen J. and Ghosh T., “Characteristics of pegmatoidal granite exposed near
Bayalan, Ajmer district, Rajasthan”, Journal of Earth Systems Science, Vol. 120, No. 4, August 2011,
pp. 617–626.

11. Kulkarni VN, “Geology of Gujarat”, Navnirman Special Issue by Irrigation, R & B Deptt.,
Gujarat State, Vol. XXVI, No.2, July-December-1985.

12. Keaton Jeffrey R., Mishra Su K. and Clopper Paul E., “Scour at Bridge Foundations on Rock:
Overview of NCHRP Project No. 24-29”, Proceedings of 5th ICSE on Rock Scour, 2008, pp. 749–756.

13. FHWA (2006), Soils and Foundations- Reference Manual, Volume II, Publication No. FHWA-
NHI-06-089, U.S. Department of Transportation, federal Highway Administration, 2006

14. Bowles J.E., (1997), Foundation Analysis and Design, 5th Edition, The McGraw-Hill.

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 15
 15. CIRIA 143 (1995), The Standard Penetration Test (SPT): Methods and Use. Report 143.

16. Look, G. Burt, (2007), Handbook of Geotechnical Investigation and Design Tables, 1 st Edition,
Taylor & Francis, 2007

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 16
Annexure

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

Page 17
 Annexure 1

Sub-soil Profile

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

 Annexure 2

Computations

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208 - Rev.0

 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code: 479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Safe Bearing Capacity of Open Foundation- Verified by: AG Sheet no: 1
Subject
IGM/Rock (CR<35%) Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results
Computation of Safe Bearing Capacity- Rectangular Footing

Stretch 303-339 Structure Major Bridge

Chainage 313/2-3 Borehole ID BH-4
Bridge No. 379 Location A1
Founding Stratum CW Gr V Rock

Footing Dimensions IS: 6403 :1981

Length of footing, L 13.50 m (Reaffirmed 2002)
Width of footing, B 8.05 m Code of Practice for
Depth of Footing, D 6.17 m Deteremination of
Embedment below MSL 3.82 m (msl- 442.653) Bearing Capacity of
Shallow Foundations
Soil Parameters
Depth of GWT 0.0 m
Cohesion of soil, c 0 kPa
Angle of internal friction Φ 36 deg SPT N = R
Inclination of Load α 0
Effective Overburden pressure q 30.56 kPa
Density of soil at base γ1 20 kN/m3

Failure Condition General Shear Failure

Modified Angle of internal friction Φ' N/A deg
Modified Cohesion, c' N/A kPa

Factor of Safety against shear 3.0

GWT correction w' 0.5

General Formula for Bearing Capacity:

qnult = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5Bγ1Nγsγdγiγw' Section 5.1.2
qnsafe =qnult/FoS

Bearing Capacity Factors: Nc 51.96 Nq 39.48 Nγ 60.31

Shape Factors: Sc 1.12 Sq 1.12 Sγ 0.76
Depth Factors: dc 1.19 dq 1.09 dγ 1.09
Load Inclination Factors: ic 1.00 iq 1.00 iγ 1.00

2
Ultimate net bearing capacity qnult 3459 kN/m
2
Net Safe bearing capacity qnsafe 1153 kN/m

Recommended Allowable Bearing Pressure at founding level, kPa = 340

 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code:479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 2
Subject Settlement Computation-IGM/Rock (CR<35%)
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results
Live Load Settlement

Input Data
Length of Footing, L = 13.50 m FHWA Reference
Breadth of Footing, B = 8.05 m Manual Vol II
Depth of Footing, D = 6.17 m Soils and Foundations
Ratio L/B = 1.68 Section 8.7

Load Intensity below footing, Dp = 28 kPa

Poissons ratio of soil, n = 0.35
Shape and Rigidity Factor, CD = 1.204
Youngs Modulus of IGM/Rock, Em = 60 MPa

Equation for Settlement

dv = CD . Dp . B . (1-n2) / Em

Settlement for 28 kPa = 4.0 mm (< 25mm)

 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code: 479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 1
Subject Safe Bearing Capacity of Open Foundation in Soil
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results
Computation of Safe Bearing Capacity- Intermediate Shear Failure

Stretch 303-339 Structure Major Bridge

Chainage 313/2-3 Borehole ID BH-3
Bridge No. 379 Location P1, P2
Founding Stratum Dense Sand

Footing Dimensions IS: 6403 :1981

Length of footing, L 15.50 m (Reaffirmed 2002)
Width of footing, B 5.60 m Code of Practice for
Depth of Footing, D 5.97 m Deteremination of
Embedment below MSL 2.67 m (msl- 441.506) Bearing Capacity of
Shallow Foundations
Soil Parameters
Depth of GWT 0 m
Cohesion of soil, c 0 kPa
Angle of internal friction Φ 33 deg SPT N = 32
Inclination of Load α 0
Effective Overburden pressure q 21.384 kPa
Density of soil below base γ1 18 kN/m3

Failure Condition Intermediate Shear Failure

Modified Angle of internal friction Φ' 23 deg
Modified Cohesion, c' 0 kPa

Factor of Safety against shear 2.5

GWT correction w' 0.50

General Formula for Bearing Capacity:

qnult = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5Bγ1Nγsγdγiγw' Section 5.1.2
qnsafe =qnult/FoS

Bearing Capacity Factors:

GSF Nc 39.728 Nq 27.340 Nγ 37.8 General Shear Failure
LSF Nc 18.364 Nq 8.956 Nγ 8.68 Local Shear Failure
Interpolation for ISF Nc 31.717 Nq 20.446 Nγ 26.9 Intermediate Shear Failure
Shape Factors: Sc 1.07 Sq 1.07 Sγ 0.86 Interpolate BC factors
Depth Factors: dc 1.18 dq 1.09 dγ 1.09 between limiting phi of 36
Load Inclination Factors: ic 1.00 iq 1.00 iγ 1.00 (GSF) and 28 (LSF)

Ultimate net bearing capacity qnult 1115 kN/m2

2
Net Safe bearing capacity qnsafe 446 kN/m

Recommended Allowable Bearing Pressure at founding level, kPa = 400

Rev 0
 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code:479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 2
Subject Settlement Computation
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results

Live Load Settlement

IS: 8009 Part I :1976
Input Data (Reaffirmed 1998)
Length of Footing, L = 15.50 m
Code of Practice for
Breadth of Footing, B = 5.60 m
Calculation of
Depth of Footing, D = 5.97 m
Settlements of
Ratio L/B = 2.8
Foundations Part I:
SPT N below Footing = 32
Shallow Foundations

Settlement per 100kPa pressure = 0.0095 m Section 9.1.4

Load Intensity below footing, Dp = 43 kPa Fig 9
Settlement = 4.1 mm

Ground water table correction factor = 0.50 D/(LB)^0.5 LB/D^0.5

Depth Correction factor = 0.8
Rigidity Correction factor = 0.8 0.64 35.52

Settlement for 43 kPa = 5.2 mm (< 25mm)

 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code: 479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 1
Subject Safe Bearing Capacity of Open Foundation in Soil
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results
Computation of Safe Bearing Capacity- Intermediate Shear Failure

Stretch 303-339 Structure Major Bridge

Chainage 313/2-3 Borehole ID BH-2
Bridge No. 379 Location P3,P4,P5
Founding Stratum Dense Sand

Footing Dimensions IS: 6403 :1981

Length of footing, L 15.50 m (Reaffirmed 2002)
Width of footing, B 5.60 m Code of Practice for
Depth of Footing, D 5.77 m Deteremination of
Embedment below MSL 2.67 m (msl- 441.506) Bearing Capacity of
Shallow Foundations
Soil Parameters
Depth of GWT 0 m
Cohesion of soil, c 0 kPa
Angle of internal friction Φ 32 deg SPT N = 41
Inclination of Load α 0
Effective Overburden pressure q 21.384 kPa
Density of soil below base γ1 18 kN/m3

Failure Condition Intermediate Shear Failure

Modified Angle of internal friction Φ' 23 deg
Modified Cohesion, c' 0 kPa

Factor of Safety against shear 2.5

GWT correction w' 0.50

General Formula for Bearing Capacity:

qnult = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5Bγ1Nγsγdγiγw' Section 5.1.2
qnsafe =qnult/FoS

Bearing Capacity Factors:

GSF Nc 36.532 Nq 24.360 Nγ 32.7 General Shear Failure
LSF Nc 17.186 Nq 8.104 Nγ 7.59 Local Shear Failure
Interpolation for ISF Nc 26.859 Nq 16.232 Nγ 20.1 Intermediate Shear Failure
Shape Factors: Sc 1.07 Sq 1.07 Sγ 0.86 Interpolate BC factors
Depth Factors: dc 1.17 dq 1.09 dγ 1.09 between limiting phi of 36
Load Inclination Factors: ic 1.00 iq 1.00 iγ 1.00 (GSF) and 28 (LSF)

Ultimate net bearing capacity qnult 850 kN/m2

2
Net Safe bearing capacity qnsafe 340 kN/m

Recommended Allowable Bearing Pressure at founding level, kPa = 340

Rev 0
 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code:479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 2
Subject Settlement Computation
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results

Live Load Settlement

IS: 8009 Part I :1976
Input Data (Reaffirmed 1998)
Length of Footing, L = 15.50 m
Code of Practice for
Breadth of Footing, B = 5.60 m
Calculation of
Depth of Footing, D = 5.77 m
Settlements of
Ratio L/B = 2.8
Foundations Part I:
SPT N below Footing = 41
Shallow Foundations

Settlement per 100kPa pressure = 0.007 m Section 9.1.4

Load Intensity below footing, Dp = 43 kPa Fig 9
Settlement = 3.0 mm

Ground water table correction factor = 0.50 D/(LB)^0.5 LB/D^0.5

Depth Correction factor = 0.81
Rigidity Correction factor = 0.8 0.62 36.14

Settlement for 43 kPa = 3.9 mm (< 25mm)

 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code: 479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 1
Subject Safe Bearing Capacity of Open Foundation in Soil
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results
Computation of Safe Bearing Capacity- Intermediate Shear Failure

Stretch 303-339 Structure Major Bridge

Chainage 313/2-3 Borehole ID BH-1
Bridge No. 379 Location P6
Founding Stratum Dense Sand

Footing Dimensions IS: 6403 :1981

Length of footing, L 15.50 m (Reaffirmed 2002)
Width of footing, B 5.60 m Code of Practice for
Depth of Footing, D 5.17 m Deteremination of
Embedment below MSL 2.67 m (msl- 441.506) Bearing Capacity of
Shallow Foundations
Soil Parameters
Depth of GWT 0 m
Cohesion of soil, c 0 kPa
Angle of internal friction Φ 31 deg SPT N = 38
Inclination of Load α 0
Effective Overburden pressure q 21.384 kPa
Density of soil below base γ1 18 kN/m3

Failure Condition Intermediate Shear Failure

Modified Angle of internal friction Φ' 22 deg
Modified Cohesion, c' 0 kPa

Factor of Safety against shear 2.5

GWT correction w' 0.50

General Formula for Bearing Capacity:

qnult = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5Bγ1Nγsγdγiγw' Section 5.1.2
qnsafe =qnult/FoS

Bearing Capacity Factors:

GSF Nc 33.336 Nq 21.380 Nγ 27.5 General Shear Failure
LSF Nc 16.008 Nq 7.252 Nγ 6.49 Local Shear Failure
Interpolation for ISF Nc 22.506 Nq 12.550 Nγ 14.4 Intermediate Shear Failure
Shape Factors: Sc 1.07 Sq 1.07 Sγ 0.86 Interpolate BC factors
Depth Factors: dc 1.17 dq 1.08 dγ 1.08 between limiting phi of 36
Load Inclination Factors: ic 1.00 iq 1.00 iγ 1.00 (GSF) and 28 (LSF)

Ultimate net bearing capacity qnult 623 kN/m2

2
Net Safe bearing capacity qnsafe 249 kN/m

Recommended Allowable Bearing Pressure at founding level, kPa = 240

Rev 0
 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code:479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 2
Subject Settlement Computation
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results

Live Load Settlement

IS: 8009 Part I :1976
Input Data (Reaffirmed 1998)
Length of Footing, L = 15.50 m
Code of Practice for
Breadth of Footing, B = 5.60 m
Calculation of
Depth of Footing, D = 5.17 m
Settlements of
Ratio L/B = 2.8
Foundations Part I:
SPT N below Footing = 38
Shallow Foundations

Settlement per 100kPa pressure = 0.0075 m Section 9.1.4

Load Intensity below footing, Dp = 43 kPa Fig 9
Settlement = 3.2 mm

Ground water table correction factor = 0.50 D/(LB)^0.5 LB/D^0.5

Depth Correction factor = 0.82
Rigidity Correction factor = 0.8 0.55 38.17

Settlement for 43 kPa = 4.2 mm (< 25mm)

 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code: 479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 1
Subject Safe Bearing Capacity of Open Foundation in Soil
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results
Computation of Safe Bearing Capacity- Intermediate Shear Failure

Stretch 303-339 Structure Major Bridge

Chainage 313/2-3 Borehole ID BH-1
Bridge No. 379 Location A2
Founding Stratum Dense Sand

Footing Dimensions IS: 6403 :1981

Length of footing, L 13.50 m (Reaffirmed 2002)
Width of footing, B 8.05 m Code of Practice for
Depth of Footing, D 5.17 m Deteremination of
Embedment below MSL 3.82 m (msl- 442.653) Bearing Capacity of
Shallow Foundations
Soil Parameters
Depth of GWT 0 m
Cohesion of soil, c 0 kPa
Angle of internal friction Φ 31 deg SPT N = 38
Inclination of Load α 0
Effective Overburden pressure q 30.56 kPa
Density of soil below base γ1 18 kN/m3

Failure Condition Intermediate Shear Failure

Modified Angle of internal friction Φ' 22 deg
Modified Cohesion, c' 0 kPa

Factor of Safety against shear 2.5

GWT correction w' 0.50

General Formula for Bearing Capacity:

qnult = cNcscdcic + q(Nq-1)sqdqiq + 0.5Bγ1Nγsγdγiγw' Section 5.1.2
qnsafe =qnult/FoS

Bearing Capacity Factors:

GSF Nc 33.336 Nq 21.380 Nγ 27.5 General Shear Failure
LSF Nc 16.008 Nq 7.252 Nγ 6.49 Local Shear Failure
Interpolation for ISF Nc 22.506 Nq 12.550 Nγ 14.4 Intermediate Shear Failure
Shape Factors: Sc 1.12 Sq 1.12 Sγ 0.76 Interpolate BC factors
Depth Factors: dc 1.17 dq 1.08 dγ 1.08 between limiting phi of 36
Load Inclination Factors: ic 1.00 iq 1.00 iγ 1.00 (GSF) and 28 (LSF)

Ultimate net bearing capacity qnult 858 kN/m2

2
Net Safe bearing capacity qnsafe 343 kN/m

Recommended Allowable Bearing Pressure at founding level, kPa = 340

Rev 0
 C
c CALCULATION SHEET
A
Western Dedicated Freight Corridor-Rewari to Created by: SJ Project code:479057
Project
Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 12.11.2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: AG Sheet no: 2
Subject Settlement Computation
Date: 12.11.2014 Revision: 0
References/results

Live Load Settlement

IS: 8009 Part I :1976
Input Data (Reaffirmed 1998)
Length of Footing, L = 13.50 m
Code of Practice for
Breadth of Footing, B = 8.05 m
Calculation of
Depth of Footing, D = 5.17 m
Settlements of
Ratio L/B = 1.7
Foundations Part I:
SPT N below Footing = 38
Shallow Foundations

Settlement per 100kPa pressure = 0.0075 m Section 9.1.4

Load Intensity below footing, Dp = 28 kPa Fig 9
Settlement = 2.1 mm

Ground water table correction factor = 0.50 D/(LB)^0.5 LB/D^0.5

Depth Correction factor = 0.85
Rigidity Correction factor = 0.8 0.50 47.8

Settlement for 28 kPa = 2.9 mm (< 25mm)

 Calculation sheet

Western Dedicated Freight Corridor- Created by: MKD Project code: 479057
Project
Rewari to Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 7/31/2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: SJ Sheet no: 1
Subject Computation of Silt Factor
Date: 7/31/2014 Revision: 1

Stretch 304-381 Bridge No. 379 IR Chainage 313/2-3 Ref- IRS-2003

(Cl. 4.6.5)
Borehole No. BH-1 Stratum M.D. sand Depth (m) 1.5-1.95

% Average Sieve % Retained x Avg Mean dia. (Dm),

Sieve Size (mm) % Retained Silt factor, f
Passing Size sieve size mm
10.000 100 0 10.000 0
4.750 99 1 7.375 7.375
2.250 98 1 3.5 3.5
1.150 95 3 1.7 5.1
0.600 93 2 0.875 1.75
0.425 90 3 0.5125 1.5375 0.308 0.977
0.300 80 10 0.3625 3.625
0.150 60 20 0.225 4.5
0.075 44 16 0.1125 1.8
Pan 44 0.0375 1.65
Sum 100 30.8375

Borehole No. BH-1 Stratum Dense sand Depth (m) 3-3.4

% Average Sieve % Retained x Avg Mean dia. (Dm),

Sieve Size (mm) % Retained Silt factor, f
Passing Size sieve size mm
10.000 100 0 10.000 0
4.750 98 2 7.375 14.75
2.250 90 8 3.5 28
1.150 51 39 1.7 66.3
0.600 32 19 0.875 16.625
0.425 29 3 0.5125 1.5375 1.318 2.021
0.300 25 4 0.3625 1.45
0.150 16 9 0.225 2.025
0.075 9 7 0.1125 0.7875
Pan 9 0.0375 0.3375
Sum 100 131.8125

Borehole No. BH-2 Stratum M.D. sand Depth (m) 1.5-1.95

% Average Sieve % Retained x Avg Mean dia. (Dm),

Sieve Size (mm) % Retained Silt factor, f
Passing Size sieve size mm
10.000 100 0 10.000 0
4.750 93 7 7.375 51.625
2.250 84 9 3.5 31.5
1.150 79 5 1.7 8.5
0.600 73 6 0.875 5.25
0.425 61 12 0.5125 6.15 1.143 1.882
0.300 50 11 0.3625 3.9875
0.150 30 20 0.225 4.5
0.075 8 22 0.1125 2.475
Pan 8 0.0375 0.3
Sum 100 114.2875

Borehole No. BH-2 Stratum M.D. sand Depth (m) 3.00-3.45

% Average Sieve % Retained x Avg Mean dia. (Dm),

Sieve Size (mm) % Retained Silt factor, f
Passing Size sieve size mm
10.000 100 0 10.000 0
4.750 94 6 7.375 44.25
2.250 85 9 3.5 31.5
1.150 80 5 1.7 8.5
0.600 68 12 0.875 10.5
0.425 60 8 0.5125 4.1 1.092 1.839
0.300 50 10 0.3625 3.625
0.150 33 17 0.225 3.825
0.075 11 22 0.1125 2.475
Pan 11 0.0375 0.4125
Sum 100 109.1875
 Calculation sheet

Western Dedicated Freight Corridor- Created by: MKD Project code: 479057
Project
Rewari to Iqbalgarh (CTP-1 & CTP-2) Date: 7/31/2014 Serial no: .03.03
Verified by: SJ Sheet no: 1
Subject Computation of Silt Factor
Date: 7/31/2014 Revision: 1

Stretch 304-381 Bridge No. 379 IR Chainage 313/2-3 Ref- IRS-2003

(Cl. 4.6.5)
Borehole No. BH-3 Stratum M.D. sand Depth (m) 1.5-1.95

% Average Sieve % Retained x Avg Mean dia. (Dm),

Sieve Size (mm) % Retained Silt factor, f
Passing Size sieve size mm
10.000 100 0 10.000 0
4.750 94 6 7.375 44.25
2.250 86 8 3.5 28
1.150 81 5 1.7 8.5
0.600 75 6 0.875 5.25
0.425 63 12 0.5125 6.15 1.036 1.792
0.300 51 12 0.3625 4.35
0.150 32 19 0.225 4.275
0.075 10 22 0.1125 2.475
Pan 10 0.0375 0.375
Sum 100 103.625

Borehole No. BH-3 Stratum Dense sand Depth (m) 3-3.3

% Average Sieve % Retained x Avg Mean dia. (Dm),

Sieve Size (mm) % Retained Silt factor, f
Passing Size sieve size mm
10.000 100 0 10.000 0
4.750 91 9 7.375 66.375
2.250 84 7 3.5 24.5
1.150 79 5 1.7 8.5
0.600 66 13 0.875 11.375
0.425 57 9 0.5125 4.6125 1.251 1.968
0.300 48 9 0.3625 3.2625
0.150 32 16 0.225 3.6
0.075 10 22 0.1125 2.475
Pan 10 0.0375 0.375
Sum 100 125.075

Borehole No. BH-4 Stratum Dense sand Depth (m) 1.5-1.95

% Average Sieve % Retained x Avg Mean dia. (Dm),

Sieve Size (mm) % Retained Silt factor, f
Passing Size sieve size mm
10.000 100 0 10.000 0
4.750 94 6 7.375 44.25
2.250 83 11 3.5 38.5
1.150 78 5 1.7 8.5
0.600 72 6 0.875 5.25
0.425 62 10 0.5125 5.125 1.119 1.861
0.300 52 10 0.3625 3.625
0.150 36 16 0.225 3.6
0.075 14 22 0.1125 2.475
Pan 14 0.0375 0.525
Sum 100 111.85

Borehole No. BH-4 Stratum Dense sand Depth (m) 3-3.4

% Average Sieve % Retained x Avg Mean dia. (Dm),

Sieve Size (mm) % Retained Silt factor, f
Passing Size sieve size mm
10.000 100 0 10.000 0
4.750 93 7 7.375 51.625
2.250 83 10 3.5 35
1.150 76 7 1.7 11.9
0.600 66 10 0.875 8.75
0.425 56 10 0.5125 5.125 1.223 1.946
0.300 46 10 0.3625 3.625
0.150 30 16 0.225 3.6
0.075 10 20 0.1125 2.25
Pan 10 0.0375 0.375
Sum 100 122.25
 Annexure 3

Field Logs and Lab Test Results

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208- Rev.0

PROJECT: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR STRUCTURE LOCATION FOR
WDFCCPACKAGE 1 & 2 SECTION 2 & 3

APPENDIX–42
STRUCTURE:379/DFC/IR
AT CH.: DFC.:40244 IR CH.:313/2-3KMS

SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.

 PROJECT: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR STRUCTURE LOCATION FOR
WDFCCPACKAGE 1 & 2 SECTION 2 & 3

APPENDIX–41
STRUCTURE:379/DFC/IR
AT CH.: DFC.:40244 IR CH.:313/2-3KMS

PAGES

PAGE NO.
Plan Of Field Investigation 1

ILLUSTRATIONS

PAGE
PAGENO.
NO.
Boring Record For Soil & Rock 2-13
Laboratory Test Results 14-29
Pressuremeter Test Results 30-32
Photographs 33

SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.

PROJECT: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR STRUCTURE LOCATION FOR
WDFCCPACKAGE 1 & 2 SECTION 2 & 3

CHAINAGE Bridge No.

IR DFC IR DFC

313/2-3 40244 379 379

SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.

1
BORELOG RECORD FOR SOIL
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379
Chainage 313/2-3 Co-Ordinates E454424.81,E2911498.47 Borehole No. BH 1
Boreing Method Rotary Drilling Boring Dia. 150 Equipment Calyx Rig
Circulation Fluid Bentonite Casing Size 150 Casinfg Depth 7.50m BGL
Orientation Vertical Ground Level .444.00 GWT with Date Nil - 28/9/2013
Start Date 25/9/2013 End Date 27/9/2013 Sheet No. 1 of 3
Borehole Termination Depth 20.00m

SPT
Depth Sample
(No. of Blows) Additional
Below Type / In- Description of Strata *
0-15 cm 15 - 30 30 - 45
N
Observation *
EGL (m) Situ Test
(Seating) cm cm
0.00/
DS 1
Brownish medium dense
1.50/ silty sand (SM)
SPT 1 8 10 13 23
1.95
3.00/
UDS 1
3.40 Brownish dense
4.50/ silty sand (SM)
SPT 2 10 16 22 38
4.95

6.00/ Completely weathered, brownish , ROCK

SPT 3 46 52 R
6.19

7.50/
SPT 4 52 R
7.64

Type of In-Situ Test / Sampling : No. of UDS / DS Colleted

SPT - Standard Penetration Test PMT - Pressure Meter Test No. of DS :
VST - Vane Shear Test UDS- Undisturbed Sample No. of UDS :
BORELOG RECORD FOR ROCK
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379 Co-Ordinates E454424.81,E2911498.47 Borehole No. BH 1
Chainage 313/2-3 Ground Level .444.00 Size of Hole NX
Orientation Vertical Pressure Used 0.5 KG Collar Elevation 7.5
Start Date 25/9/2013 End Date 27/9/2013 GWT with Date Nil - 28/9/2013
Borehole Termination Depth 20.00m Sheet No. 2 of 3

Depth Drilled Legh of Core Pieces

Time Clour of Type of
(m) Core SPT * Total Depth recovered TCR SCR RQD Water
wash Barrel & Bit Type of Formation Observation
No. No. of drill (m) <10-25 25 % % % Loss
From To From To <10 cm water used
cm cm
8.00 9.00 7.50 9.00 1 to 2 50 1.50 7 7% NIL
10.00 11.00 9.00 10.00 3 to 4 50 1.00 4 4% NIL Brownish
12.00 13.00 10.00 11.00 5 to 7 50 1.00 6 -- -- 6% --
15.00 16.00 11.00 12.00 8 to 10 50 1.00 10 -- 10% weathered.
17.00 18.00 12.00 13.00 11 To13 1.00 15 -- 15% 7% NIL greyish, micaschist
8.00 9.30 13.00 14.00 14 To18 1.00 8 62 -- 70% 62% 62%
10%
10.00 11.30 14.00 15.00 19 To25 1.00 18 42 -- 60% 42% 42% DT Daimond
Greyish
12.30 14.00 15.00 16.00 26 To32 1.00 32 10 -- 42% 24% 10%
14.30 15.30 16.00 17.00 33 To38 1.00 15 -- 15%
16.00 17.00 17.00 18.00 34 To48 1.00 37 -- 37% 25% NIL
17.30 18.30 18.00 19.00 49 To51 1.00 44 -- 44% 44% 44%
8.00 9.00 19.00 20.00 52 To55 1.00 3 40 -- 43% 40% 40%

* SPT shall be conducted where ever TCR <10 % . No. of blows with respect to penetration shall be recorded
TCR -Total Core Recovery SCR - Solid Core Recovery RQD - Rock Quality Designation 85
BOREHOLE LITHOLOGICAL LOG
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379 Co-Ordinates E454424.81,E2911498.47 Borehole No. BH 1
Chainage 313/2-3 Ground Level .444.00 Size of Hole NX
Orientation Vertical Pressure Used 0.5 KG Sheet No. 3 of 3
Borehole Termination Depth 20.00m

Depth Drilled
Fracture &
(m) Total Depth of Colour Grain Structure & Weathering Mineral Specifica
Texture Strength * fracture Rock Name
drill (m) of Rock Size Discontinuities * Grade * Composition Observation
From To Index *

7.50 9.00 1.50 Greyish Medium foliated >2000mm V 1-5.0 2/1.5

9.00 10.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated >2000mm V 1-5.0 2/m
10.00 11.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated >2000mm V 1-5.0 2/m
11.00 12.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated >2000mm V 1-5.0 2/m
12.00 13.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated >2000mm V 1-5.0 2/m
13.00 14.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 60-200mm II 100-250 4/m Mica, quartz,
Micaschist
14.00 15.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 60-200mm II 100-250 6/m feldspar
15.00 16.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 50-100 6/m
16.00 17.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm IV 25-50 5/m
17.00 18.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 25-50 9/m
18.00 19.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 25-50 3/m
19.00 20.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 25-50 8/m
BORELOG RECORD FOR SOIL
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379
Chainage 313/2-3 Co-Ordinates E454426.41,N2911480 Borehole No. BH 2
Boreing Method Rotary Drilling Boring Dia. 150 Equipment Calyx Rig
Circulation Fluid Bentonite Casing Size 150 Casinfg Depth 7.50m BGL
Orientation Vertical Ground Level .444.600 GWT with Date Nil - 28/9/2013
Start Date 25/9/2013 End Date 27/9/2013 Sheet No. 1 of 3
Borehole Termination Depth 20.00m

SPT
Depth Sample
(No. of Blows) Additional
Below Type / In- Description of Strata *
EGL (m) Situ Test
0-15 cm 15 - 30 30 - 45
N
Observation *
(Seating) cm cm
0.00/
DS 1
Brownish medium dense
1.50/ Silty sand (SM)
SPT 1 5 6 10 16
1.95
3.00/
UDS 1
3.40
4.50/
SPT 2 8 11 13 24
4.95
6.00/ Brownish medium dense
SPT 3 14 18 23 41
6.45 Silty sand (SM)
7.50/
SPT 4 55 R
7.55
9.00 Completely weathered,
SPT 5 55 R
9.05 brownish , ROCK

Type of In-Situ Test / Sampling : No. of UDS / DS Colleted

SPT - Standard Penetration Test PMT - Pressure Meter Test No. of DS :
VST - Vane Shear Test UDS- Undisturbed Sample No. of UDS :
BORELOG RECORD FOR ROCK
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location [Link]. 379 Co-Ordinates E454426.41,N2911480 Borehole No. BH 2
Chainage 313/2-3 Ground Level .444.600 Size of Hole NX
Orientation Vertical Pressure Used 0.5 kg Collar Elevation 7.5
Start Date 25/9/2013 End Date 27/9/2013 GWT with Date Nil - 28/9/2013
Borehole Termination Depth 20.00m Sheet No. 2 of 3

Legh of Core Pieces Water

Time Depth Drilled (m) Clour of Type of
Core SPT * Total Depth recovered TCR SCR RQD Loss Type of
wash Barrel & Bit Observation
No. No. of drill (m) <10-25 25 % % % Formation
From To From To <10 cm water used
cm cm
8.00 8.45 9.00 10.00 1 to 4 50 1.00 8 8% NIL Brownish
9.30 10.00 10.00 11.00 5 to 7 50 1.00 8 8% NIL
10.30 11.00 11.00 12.00 8 to 10 50 1.00 15 -- -- 15% 7% --
11.30 12.00 12.00 13.00 11 to 13 50 1.00 7 27 -- 34% 34% 27%
12.30 13.00 13.00 14.00 14 To 20 1.00 23 11 -- 34% 21% 11%
14.00 14.30 14.00 15.00 21 To 26 1.00 25 25 25% 19% NIL DT weathered
15%
15.00 15.30 15.00 16.00 27 To 30 1.00 32 32 32% 32% NIL Greyish Daimond .greyish,
16.00 16.30 16.00 17.00 31 To 36 1.00 19 15 34 34% 25% 15% micaschist
17.00 17.45 17.00 18.00 37 To 40 1.00 29 29 29% 29% NIL
8.00 9.00 18.00 19.00 41 To50 1.00 34 -- 34% 25% NIL
9.30 10.30 19.00 20.00 51 To54 1.00 9 22 -- 31% 27% 22%

* SPT shall be conducted where ever TCR <10 % . No. of blows with respect to penetration shall be recorded
TCR -Total Core Recovery SCR - Solid Core Recovery RQD - Rock Quality Designation
BOREHOLE LITHOLOGICAL LOG
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379 Co-Ordinates E454426.41,N2911480 Borehole No. BH 2
Chainage 313/2-3 Ground Level .444.600 Size of Hole NX
Orientation Vertical Pressure Used 0.5kg Sheet No.
Borehole termination Depth 20.00m

Depth Drilled
Fracture &
(m) Total Depth of Colour Structure & Weathering Strength Mineral Specifica
Grain Size Texture fracture Rock Name
drill (m) of Rock Discontinuities * Grade * * Composition Observation
From To Index *

9.0 10.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm V `5-25 4/m

10.0 11.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm V `5-25 2/m
11.0 12.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm V `5-25 2/m
12.0 13.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 25-50 3/m
13.0 14.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 25-50 6/m
Mica. Feldspar,
14.0 15.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 25-50 5/m Micaschist
quartz
15.0 16.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 25-50 3/m
16.0 17.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm III 25-50 4/m
17.0 18.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm IV 25-May 3/m
18.0 19.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm IV 25-May 9/m
19.0 20.0 1.0 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm IV 25-May 3/m
BORELOG RECORD FOR SOIL
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379
Chainage 313/2-3 Co-Ordinates E454424.66,E2911457.86 Borehole No. BH 3
Boreing Method Rotary Drilling Boring Dia. 150 Equipment Calyx Rig
Circulation Fluid Bentonite Casing Size 150 Casinfg Depth 7.50m BGL
Orientation Vertical Ground Level .444.80 GWT with Date Nil - 28/9/2013
Start Date 24/9/2013 End Date 26/9/2013 Sheet No. 1 of 3
Borehole Termination Depth 18.00m

SPT
Depth Sample
(No. of Blows) Additional
Below Type / In- Description of Strata *
0-15 cm 15 - 30 30 - 45
N
Observation *
EGL (m) Situ Test
(Seating) cm cm
0.00/
DS 1
1.50 Brownish medium dense
1.50/ silty sand (SM)
SPT 1 8 11 15 26
1.95
3.00/
UDS 1
3.30 Brownish dense
4.50/ silty sand (SM)
SPT 2 8 13 19 32
4.95
4.50/
DS 1
6.00 Completely weathered,
6.00/ SPT 3 41 52 R brownish , ROCK
6.20
7.50/
SPT 4 52 R
7.60

Type of In-Situ Test / Sampling : No. of UDS / DS Colleted

SPT - Standard Penetration Test PMT - Pressure Meter Test No. of DS :
VST - Vane Shear Test UDS- Undisturbed Sample No. of UDS :
BORELOG RECORD FOR ROCK
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379 Co-Ordinates E454424.66,E2911457.86 Borehole No. BH 3
Chainage 313/2-3 Ground Level .444.80 Size of Hole NX
Orientation Vertical Pressure Used 0.5 KG Collar Elevation 7.5
Start Date 24/9/2013 End Date 26/9/2013 GWT with Date Nil - 28/9/2013
Borehole Termination Depth 18.00m Sheet No. 2 of 3

Depth Drilled Legh of Core Pieces

Time Clour of Type of
(m) Core SPT * Total Depth recovered TCR SCR RQD Water
wash Barrel & Bit Type of Formation Observation
No. No. of drill (m) <10-25 25 % % % Loss
From To From To <10 cm water used
cm cm
12.00 12.30 8.00 9.00 1 to 3 -- 1.00 15 15% NIL
13.00 13.50 9.00 10.00 4 to 6 1.00 13 13% 5% NIL Brownish
14.00 14.30 10.00 11.00 7 to 9 1.00 18 -- -- 18% 14% --
15.00 15.30 11.00 12.00 10 to 15 1.00 17 -- 17% weathered.
16.00 16.30 12.00 13.00 16 To19 1.00 12 -- 12% NIL greyish, micaschist
15%
9.00 9.30 13.00 14.00 20 To22 1.00 11 -- 11% DT Daimond
Greyish
10.00 10.30 14.00 15.00 23 To27 1.00 11 -- 11% 6%
11.00 11.30 15.00 16.00 28 To31 1.00 12 -- 12% 5%
12.00 12.30 16.00 17.00 32 To36 1.00 20 -- 20% 10%
13.00 13.50 17.00 18.00 37 To45 1.00 30 -- 30% 5%

* SPT shall be conducted where ever TCR <10 % . No. of blows with respect to penetration shall be recorded
TCR -Total Core Recovery SCR - Solid Core Recovery RQD - Rock Quality Designation 85
BOREHOLE LITHOLOGICAL LOG
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379 Co-Ordinates E454424.66,E2911457.86 Borehole No. BH 3
Chainage 313/2-3 Ground Level .444.80 Size of Hole NX
Orientation Vertical Pressure Used 0.5 KG Sheet No. 3 of 3
Borehole Termination Depth 18.00m

Depth Drilled
Fracture &
(m) Total Depth of Colour Grain Structure & Weathering Mineral Specifica
Texture Strength * fracture Rock Name
drill (m) of Rock Size Discontinuities * Grade * Composition Observation
From To Index *

8.00 9.00 1.00 3

9.00 10.00 1.00 3
10.00 11.00 1.00 3
11.00 12.00 1.00 5
12.00 13.00 1.00 600-2000MM V 1-5. 4 Mica, quartz,
Greyish Medium foliated Micaschist
13.00 14.00 1.00 2 feldspar
14.00 15.00 1.00 4
15.00 16.00 1.00 3
16.00 17.00 1.00 4
17.00 18.00 1.00 200-600mm III 50-25 7
BORELOG RECORD FOR SOIL
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379
Chainage 313/2-3 Co-Ordinates E454424.6,N2911439.4 Borehole No. BH 4
Boreing Method Rotary Drilling Boring Dia. 150 Equipment Calyx Rig
Circulation Fluid Bentonite Casing Size 150 Casinfg Depth 7.50m BGL
Orientation Vertical Ground Level .445.000 GWT with Date Nil - 28/9/2013
Start Date 24/9/2013 End Date 26/9/2013 Sheet No. 1 of 3
Borehole Termination Depth 19.00m

SPT
Depth Sample
(No. of Blows) Additional
Below Type / In- Description of Strata *
EGL (m) Situ Test
0-15 cm 15 - 30 30 - 45
N
Observation *
(Seating) cm cm
0.00/
DS 1
Brownish dense
1.50/ Silty sand (SM)
SPT 1 12 15 22 37
1.95
3.00/
UDS 1
3.40
4.50/
SPT 2 11 18 24 42
4.95
6.00/ Completely weathered,
SPT 3 36 44 52 R
6.35 brownish , ROCK
7.50/
SPT 4 42 52 R
7.75
9..00/
SPT 5 52 - R
9.11

Type of In-Situ Test / Sampling : No. of UDS / DS Colleted

SPT - Standard Penetration Test PMT - Pressure Meter Test No. of DS :
VST - Vane Shear Test UDS- Undisturbed Sample No. of UDS :
BORELOG RECORD FOR ROCK
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379 Co-Ordinates E454424.6,N2911439.4 Borehole No. BH 4
Chainage 313/2-3 Ground Level .445.000 Size of Hole NX
Orientation Vertical Pressure Used 0.5 KG Collar Elevation 7.5
Start Date 24/9/2013 End Date 26/9/2013 GWT with Date Nil - 28/9/2013
Borehole Termination Depth 19.00m Sheet No. 2 of 3

Legh of Core Pieces Water

Time Depth Drilled (m) Clour of Type of
Core SPT * Total Depth recovered TCR SCR RQD Loss Type of
wash Barrel & Bit Observation
No. No. of drill (m) <10-25 25 % % % Formation
From To From To <10 cm water used
cm cm
16.00 17.00 9.00 10.00 1 to 4 1.00 11 11% 5 NIL
17.20 18.20 10.00 11.00 5 to 7 1.00 15 15% 11 NIL
18.40 19.30 11.00 12.00 8 to 9 1.00 3 20 -- 23% 20% 20%
7.30 8.50 12.00 13.50 10 to 19 1.50 40 -- 27% 13% NIL
15% DT DIAMOND
9.30 11.00 13.50 15.00 20 To 31 1.50 32 62 -- 63% 42% 42% Greyish Moderatly weathred,
11.30 13.00 15.00 16.50 32 To 43 1.50 26 71 -- 65% 48% 48% Brownish, micaschist
13.40 16.00 16.50 18.00 44 To 53 1.50 16 86 -- 69% 57% 57%
16.20 17.40 18.00 19.00 54 To 63 1.00 42 25 -- 67% 25% 25%

* SPT shall be conducted where ever TCR <10 % . No. of blows with respect to penetration shall be recorded
TCR -Total Core Recovery SCR - Solid Core Recovery RQD - Rock Quality Designation 85
BOREHOLE LITHOLOGICAL LOG
Project Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
Client L&T CONSTRUCTION
Agency SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
Location Bridge no. 379 Co-Ordinates E454424.6,N2911439.4 Borehole No. BH 4
Chainage 313/2-3 Ground Level .445.000 Size of Hole NX
Orientation Vertical Pressure Used 0.5kg Sheet No. 3 of 3
Borehole termination Depth 19.00m

Depth Drilled
Fracture &
(m) Total Depth of Colour Grain Structure & Weathering Mineral Specifica
Texture Strength * fracture Rock Name
drill (m) of Rock Size Discontinuities * Grade * Composition Observation
From To Index *

9.00 10.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm V `1-5 4

10.00 11.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 600-2000mm V `1-5 3
11.00 12.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm IV `1-5 2
12.00 13.50 1.50 Greyish Medium foliated 200-600mm IV `5-25 10/1.5 Mica quartz,
Micaschist
13.50 15.00 1.50 Greyish Medium foliated 60-200mm III 100-250 12/1.5 feldspar
15.00 16.50 1.50 Greyish Medium foliated 60-200mm III 100-250 11/1.5
16.50 18.00 1.50 Greyish Medium foliated 60-200mm III 100-250 9/1.5
18.00 19.00 1.00 Greyish Medium foliated 60-200mm III 100-250 9/1.5
 CH. 313/2-3 CH. 313/2-3 CH. 313/2-3 CH. 313/2-3
BH-1A BH-02 BH-03 BH-04
GL.445.00m GL.445.00m. GL.445.00m
GL.444.600m.
DS1
444.00 GL.444.000m. DS1 GL.444.80m. 444.00
DS1 DS1 N=37
443.00 N=16 443.00
N=23 N=26
442.00 UDS1 ( I ) 442.00
UDS1 (I)
(I)
441.00 (I) (I) 441.00
UDS1 UDS1
N=42
440.00 N=24 440.00
N=38 N=32
439.00 N=R 439.00
N=41
438.00 438.00
( II ) N=R N=R ( II ) ( II )
N=R
437.00 N=R ( II ) 437.00
( II )
CR% RQD%
N=R N=R
436.00 CR% RQD% CR% RQD% 436.00
N=R
07 NIL CR% RQD%
N=R 15 NIL 11 NIL
435.00 08 NIL 435.00
04 NIL 13 NIL 15 NIL
434.00 08 NIL 434.00
06 NIL 18 NIL 23 20
433.00 15 NIL 433.00
10 NIL 17 NIL
432.00 27 NIL 432.00
34 27
15 NIL 12 NIL
431.00 34 11 431.00
63 42
70 62 11 NIL
430.00 ( III ) 25 NIL ( III ) 430.00
( III ) ( III )
60 42 11 NIL
429.00 32 NIL 65 48 429.00
42 10 12 NIL
428.00 34 15 428.00
69 57
15 NIL 20 NIL
427.00 29 NIL 427.00
37 NIL 30 NIL 67 25
426.00 34 NIL 426.00
44 44 (426.8m.)
425.00 (426.00m.) 425.00
31 22
43 40
424.00 (424.6m.) 424.00
(424.000m.)
CLIENT :
LEGEND :
LAYERS
L & T CONSTRUCTION
( I ) SILTY SAND
TITLE : Sub Surface Profile Through Bore Holes for Proposed Western Dedicated Freight Corridor
( II ) COMPLETELY
WEATHERED Corporation (DFCC) CTP-1&2 at Haryana to Iqbalgarh in Gujarat, Via-Rajasthan.
ROCK
( III ) SCHIST
SKW SOIL AND SURVEY CO.
B-105,PLOT NO.92 TO 96 PANCHVATI [Link], SECTOR-5,GHANSOLI(W), NAVI MUMBAI
( IV ) BOULDERS
Drawn By : Dinesh Shelar Date : July - 2014
( V ) MARBLE
Checked By : VSP Scale : H:- 1:500, V:- 1:100
Appr. by. : SKW Drg. No. : skw/section-3/L&T/SSP1
 TEST CERTIFICATE

LOCATION : 313/2-3 (BH-01)

SAMPLE COLLECTED :
SAMPLE DROWN BY : SKW SOIL &SURVEY CO.
SUBJECT : LABORATORY TEST
TESTED BY: AECS ENGINEERING &GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES P. LTD.

IS:1121(Part-1) 1974
IS:2720 (Part-5) 1985

IS:13030-1991
IS:9143-1979

IS:8764-1998
By Calculation
IS:1498 - IS:2720
IS Code Reference IS:2720 (Part-4) - 1985 IS:2720 (Part-5) - 1985 IS:2720 (Part-5) 1985 IS:2720
1970 (Part-4)
1980

Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limit Direct Shear Test Chemical Analysis Rock
[Link].

Angle of Internal Friction,Phi

ompressive
Sample Description

onate (%)
ssification

est (Mpa)
phate (%)
ntent (%)

oride (%)

Water Absorrbtion %
Cohesion In tercept,
y (g/cc)

Oragnic Matter (%)

ndex(%)

Gravity
ple ID

Strength ((Mpa)
Deptth (M)

m2)

y%
Plastic (%)
Gravel ((%)

Liquid ((%)

es)
%)

%)

%)
Sand (%

C (Kg/Cm
Silt 0(%

Clay (%

Calcium Carbo
Bulk Density

Porosity
Samp

(Degree

Point Load Te
Moisture con

Soluble Chlo
Plasticity In

Soluble Sulp
Specific G

Unconfined Co
Soil Clas

pH
1 SPT-1 Silty Sand 0.00-3.00 SM 0 76 24 0 1.86 2.60 20.63

2 UDS-1 Clayey Sand 3.00-4.50 ML-CL 2 88 6 4 23 18 5 1.89 16.58 0.20 30 8.32 0.019 1.52 14.95 0.01

3 SPT-2 ML 24 NON PLASTIC 2.67 0.15 29

Silty Sand 4.50-12.00

4 SPT-3 SM 9 90 1 0

5 ROCK 2.68 3.23 1.23

6 ROCK Mica Schist 12.00-17.00 2.75 30.52 0.93

7 ROCK 35.62
 Grain Size in Millimeters

SPT-1 UDS-1 SPT-3

100

90

80

70
Percentage Passing

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

Fig. 1: Grain Size Distribution Curves of 313/2-3 (BH-01)

 DRAINED DIRECT SHEAR TEST ON SOIL
(IS : 2720 (PART-13)-1986, RA-2010)
Chainage: 313/2-3 (BH-1) Sample Depth: 3.00-3.40m Sample Description: Silty Sand
SAMPLE DETAILS TEST RESULTS
Sample No.: UDS-1
Cohesion Intercept, c
0.20
Type Remoulded (kg/cm2):
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm3): 1.62 Angle of Internal
30
Condition Saturated Friction, φ (degrees):
Rate of Strain (mm/min) 0.25 0.25 0.25
Vertical Pressure (kg/cm2) 1 2 3
Shear Stress (Kg/cm2) 0.81 1.4 2.05

DIRECT SHEAR TEST 1

Fig. 1 Shear Stress Vs Normal Stress
UDS-1
C = 0.20kg/cm2
3.50
Ф = 30º

3.25

3.00

2.75

2.50

2.25
Shear Shear Stress, Kg/cm2

2.00

1.75

1.50

1.25

1.00

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.00
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25 3.5
Normal Stress ,Kg/cm2
 DRAINED DIRECT SHEAR TEST ON SOIL
(IS : 2720 (PART-13)-1986, RA-2010)
Chainage: 313/2-3 (BH-1) Sample Depth: 4.50-4.95m Sample Description: Silty Sand
SAMPLE DETAILS TEST RESULTS
Sample No.: SPT-2
Cohesion Intercept, c
0.15
Type Remoulded (kg/cm2):
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm3): 1.63 Angle of Internal
29
Condition Saturated Friction, φ (degrees):
Rate of Strain (mm/min) 0.25 0.25 0.25
Vertical Pressure (kg/cm2) 1 2 3
Shear Stress (Kg/cm2) 0.75 1.33 2

DIRECT SHEAR TEST 1

Fig. 2 Shear Stress Vs Normal Stress
SPT-2
C = 0.15kg/cm2
3.50

3.25

3.00

2.75

2.50

2.25
Shear Shear Stress, Kg/cm2

2.00

1.75

1.50

1.25

1.00

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.00
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25 3.5
Normal Stress ,Kg/cm2
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
[Link].

Client:
Project:

SUBJECT:
Sample ID/N-Value/[Link].
LOCATION :
Bore Hole No:

UDS-1

SPT-3(43)
SPT-2(24)
SPT-1(16)

ROCK (31)
ROCK (27)
ROCK (13)
2

Sample Description
313/2-3

Silty Sand

Mica Schist
IS Code Reference
Depth (M)
LABORATORY TEST

0.00-12.00

12.00-17.00
L & T CONSTRUCTION

Gravel (%)

6.2
8.5
9.1
7.7
SAMPLE DROWN BY : SKW SOIL &SURVEY CO.

Sand (%)

83.2
77.1
81.5
84.8
IS:2720 (Part-4) - 1985
Silt (%)

9.4
7.6

10.6
14.4
Grain Size Analysis
TESTED BY: NOBLE GEO STRUCTS, MULUND(W), MUMBAI.

Clay (%)

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Liquid (%)

Plastic (%) IS:2720 (Part-5) - 1985

NP
NP
NP
NP
Atterberg Limit

Plastic Index(%)

IS Classification IS: 1498 -1970

SM

SP-SM
SP-SM

-
Bulk Density (g/cc) By Calculation

2.48
2.45
1.90
1.85

-
-
Specific Gravity IS:2720 (Part-4) 1980

2.51
2.66
2.69
2.69
2.68
TEST CERTIFICATE

Moisture content (%) IS:2720 (Part-5) 1985

18.47
21.02

Cohesion Intercept
0.00
0.00

IS:2720 (Part-5) 1985

Angle of Internal Friction
33.0
31.0

(Degrees)
Direct Shear Test
Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3

pH IS: 2720 (Part 26) 1982

6.8

Soluble Sulphate (%) IS: 2720 (Part -27) 1982

Oragnic Matter (%) IS: 2720 (Part -22) 1983

Chemical Analysis

Soluble Chloride (%) IS: 2720 (Part -23) 1984

0.0212 0.6013 0.05

Unconfined Compressive
-

IS:9143-1979
9.66

Strength(Mpa)
14.49

Point Load Strength

-
-

IS:8764-1998
0.37

Index (Mpa)
-
-

Porosity (%) IS:13030-1991

1.79
Rock testing

-
-

Water Absorbtion(%) IS:13030-1991

0.54
CLIENT : L&T
PROJECT : Geo Technical investigation work for DFCC Western Corridor , Rajastan
LOCATION : 313/2-3 (BH 2)
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL

100

80
percent passing,%

60

40

20
BH 2/SPT1

BH2/UDS

0
0.001 0.01 0.1 sieve size,mm 1 10

BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % [Link] NMC % DD g/cc
BH 2/SPT1 1.50 7.65 84.80 7.55 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.68 - -
BH2/UDS 3.00 9.10 81.50 9.40 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.69 21.02 1.53

19
CLIENT : L&T
PROJECT : Geo Technical investigation work for DFCC Western Corridor , Rajastan
LOCATION : 313/2-3 (BH 2)
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL

100

80
percent passing,%

60

40

20
BH 2/SPT2

BH2/SPT3

0
0.001 0.01 0.1 sieve size,mm 1 10

BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % [Link] NMC % DD g/cc
BH 2/SPT2 4.50 8.50 77.10 14.40 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.69 - -
BH2/SPT3 6.00 6.20 83.23 10.58 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.66 - -

20
Client: L&T CONSTRUCTION
Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
LOCATION : 313/2-3
Sample Drawn by SKW SOIL &SURVEY CO. BH NO : 2
Sample UDS1 Depth: 3.0 -3.4 m
Tested by NOBLE GEO STRUCTS, MULUND(W), MUMBAI.
Normal Stress Kg/cm2 0 1 1.5 2

Shear Stress Kg/cm2 0 0.61 0.87 1.18

Cohesion kg/cm2 0 φ 31 degree

Direct shear test

2.5

2
τ , Shear stress (Kg/cm 2)

1.5

0.5

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

σ,Normal Stress (Kg/cm 2 )

21
 DIRECT SHEAR TEST
CLIENT:L&T CONSTRUCTION
Project: Geotechnical Inves tigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3

Location: 313/2-3 BH No. 2

Height of the s pecim en = 2 cm SAMPLE ID. UDS 1

Rate of s train = 1.25 m m /m in. Area of the specim en = 36 s q. cm

Depth = 3 m L.C. of s rain dial gauge = 0.01

Moisture Content(%) 21 Bulk Density(g/cc) 1.85

Norm al s tres s (kg/cm 2) σ1 σ1.5 σ2.0 2

DIRECT SHEAR TEST
Strain Dial 2
τ Shear s tres s (kg/cm ) σ1 σ1.5 σ2.0
[Link] Strain %
0 0 0 0.00 0.000
0.5 0.83 0.055 0.13 0.228
1 1.67 0.072 0.18 0.296 1.5
1.5 2.50 0.087 0.23 0.336
2 3.33 0.157 0.26

2
0.438

SHEAR STRESS Kg/cm

2.5 4.17 0.170 0.35 0.546
3 5.00 0.208 0.37 0.614 1
3.5 5.83 0.226 0.41 0.696
4 6.67 0.268 0.45 0.726
4.5 7.50 0.284 0.49 0.782
5 8.33 0.321 0.54 0.836
0.5
5.5 9.17 0.379 0.60 0.921
6 10.00 0.405 0.63 0.947
6.5 10.83 0.430 0.67 0.989
7 11.67 0.469 0.70 1.005
7.5 12.50 0.500 0.74 0
1.078
0 5 10 15 20
8 13.33 0.519 0.79 1.108
8.5 14.17 0.564 0.86 1.120
9 15.00 0.597 0.87 1.155
9.5 15.83 0.614 0.87 STRAIN, %
1.181
10 16.67 0.602 0.87 1.158

22
Client: L&T CONSTRUCTION
Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
LOCATION : 313/2-3
Sample Drawn by SKW SOIL &SURVEY CO. BH NO : 2
Sample SPT3 Depth: 6.0 -6.45 m
Tested by NOBLE GEO STRUCTS, MULUND(W), MUMBAI.
Normal Stress Kg/cm2 0 1 1.5 2

Shear Stress Kg/cm2 0 0.65 0.97 1.29

Cohesion kg/cm2 0 φ 33 degree

Direct shear test

2.5

2
τ , Shear stress (Kg/cm2)

1.5

0.5

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

σ,Normal Stress (Kg/cm 2 )

23
 DIRECT SHEAR TEST
CLIENT:L&T CONSTRUCTION
Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3

Location: 313/2-3 BH No. 2

Height of the specimen = 2 cm SAMPLE ID. (SPT3)

Rate of s train = 1.25 mm/min. Area of the s pecimen = 36 sq. cm

Depth = 6 m L.C. of srain dial gauge = 0.01

Moisture Content(%) 18.47 Bulk Density(g/cc) 1.9

Normal s tres s(kg/cm 2) σ1 σ1.5 σ2.0 2

DIRECT SHEAR TEST
Strain Dial 2
τ Shear stress(kg/cm ) σ1 σ1.5 σ2.0
[Link] Strain %
0 0 0 0.00 0.000
0.5 0.83 0.086 0.13 0.259
1 1.67 0.111 0.18 0.340 1.5
1.5 2.50 0.151 0.25 0.421
2 3.33 0.168 0.30

2
0.519

SHEAR STRESS Kg/cm

2.5 4.17 0.197 0.34 0.562
3 5.00 0.248 0.39 0.644 1
3.5 5.83 0.274 0.46 0.734
4 6.67 0.303 0.52 0.825
4.5 7.50 0.306 0.58 0.881
5 8.33 0.347 0.63 0.944
0.5
5.5 9.17 0.370 0.67 0.985
6 10.00 0.414 0.73 1.023
6.5 10.83 0.426 0.78 1.080
7 11.67 0.488 0.86 1.135
7.5 12.50 0.512 0.89 0
1.161
0 5 10 15 20
8 13.33 0.544 0.92 1.192
8.5 14.17 0.600 0.95 1.198
9 15.00 0.614 0.97 1.265
9.5 15.83 0.652 0.97 STRAIN, %
1.293
10 16.67 0.629 0.97 1.276

24
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
SL.N
No. Client:
Project:

SUBJECT:
Sample ID/N-Value/[Link].
LOCATION :
Bore Hole No:

UDS-1

ROCK (7)
SPT-3(.R)
SPT-2(32)
SPT-1(26)

ROCK (42)
ROCK (31)
3

Sample Description
313/2-3

Silty Sand

Mica Schist
IS Code Reference
Depth (M)
LABORATORY TEST

0.00-10.00

10.00-18.00
L & T CONSTRUCTION

Gravel (%)

6.5
8.4
9.1
6.3
SAMPLE DROWN BY : SKW SOIL &SURVEY CO.

Sand (%)

85.1
78.5
81.5
84.2
IS:2720 (Part-4) - 1985
Silt (%)

8.4
9.4
9.5

13.1
TESTED BY: NOBLE GEO STRUCTS, MULUND(W), MUMBAI.

Grain Size Analysis

Clay (%)

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Liquid (%)

Plastic (%) IS:2720 (Part-5) - 1985

NP
NP
NP
NP
Atterberg Limit

Plastic Index(%)

IS Classification IS: 1498 -1970

SM

SP-SM
SP-SM

-
-
Bulk Density (g/cc) By Calculation

2.43
1.90
1.86

-
-
Specific Gravity IS:2720 (Part-4) 1980

2.46
2.67
2.66
2.67
2.68
TEST CERTIFICATE

Moisture content (%) IS:2720 (Part-5) 1985

18.5
22.9

Cohesion Intercept
0.00
0.00

IS:2720 (Part-5) 1985

Angle of Internal Friction
33.0
31.0

(Degrees)
Geotechnical Investigation for Structure Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3

Direct Shear Test

pH IS: 2720 (Part 26) 1982

Soluble Sulphate (%) IS: 2720 (Part -27) 1982

Oragnic Matter (%) IS: 2720 (Part -22) 1983

Chemical Analysis

Soluble Chloride (%) IS: 2720 (Part -23) 1984

Unconfined Compressive
-
-

IS:9143-1979
8.61

Strength(Mpa)

Point Load Strength Index

-

IS:8764-1998
1.43
2.14

(Mpa)
-
-

Porosity (%) IS:13030-1991

2.85
Rock testing

-
-

Water Absorbtion(%) IS:13030-1991

1.68
CLIENT : L&T
PROJECT : Geo Technical investigation work for DFCC Western Corridor , Rajastan
LOCATION : 313/2-3 (BH 3)
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL

100

80
percent passing,%

60

40

20
BH 3/SPT1

BH3/UDS

0
0.001 0.01 0.1 sieve size,mm 1 10

BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % [Link] NMC % DD g/cc
BH 3/SPT1 1.50 6.30 84.20 9.50 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.68 - -

BH3/UDS 3.00 9.10 81.50 9.40 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.67 22.87 1.51

26
CLIENT : L&T
PROJECT : Geo Technical investigation work for DFCC Western Corridor , Rajastan
LOCATION : 313/2-3 (BH 3)
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL

100

80
percent passing,%

60

40

20
BH 3/SPT2

BH3/SPT3

0
0.001 0.01 0.1 sieve size,mm 1 10

BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % [Link] NMC % DD g/cc
BH 3/SPT2 4.50 8.40 78.50 13.10 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.66 - -

BH3/SPT3 6.00 6.50 85.10 8.40 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.67 - -

27
Client: L&T CONSTRUCTION
Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
LOCATION : 313/2-3
Sample Drawn by SKW SOIL &SURVEY CO. BH NO : 3
Sample UDS1 Depth: 3.0 -3.3 m
Tested by NOBLE GEO STRUCTS, MULUND(W), MUMBAI.
Normal Stress Kg/cm2 0 1 1.5 2

Shear Stress Kg/cm2 0 0.61 0.88 1.17

Cohesion kg/cm2 0 φ 31 degree

Direct shear test

2.5

2
τ , Shear stress (Kg/cm2)

1.5

0.5

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

σ,Normal Stress (Kg/cm 2)

28
 DIRECT SHEAR TEST
CLIENT:L&T CONSTRUCTION
Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3

Location: 313/2-3 BH No. 3

Height of the s pecimen = 2 cm SAMPLE ID. UDS 1

Rate of s train = 1.25 mm/min. Area of the s pecimen = 36 s q. cm

Depth = 3 m L.C. of s rain dial gauge = 0.01

Moisture Content(%) 21 Bulk Density(g/cc) 1.85

Normal stres s(kg/cm 2) σ1 σ1.5 σ2.0 2

DIRECT SHEAR TEST
Strain Dial 2
τ Shear s tress (kg/cm ) σ1 σ1.5 σ2.0
[Link] Strain %
0 0 0 0.00 0.000
0.5 0.83 0.030 0.17 0.301
1 1.67 0.052 0.23 0.357 1.5
1.5 2.50 0.059 0.25 0.416
2 3.33 0.089 0.29

2
0.459

SHEAR STRESS Kg/cm

2.5 4.17 0.117 0.37 0.515
3 5.00 0.139 0.44 0.609 1
3.5 5.83 0.180 0.49 0.671
4 6.67 0.218 0.51 0.720
4.5 7.50 0.268 0.58 0.754
5 8.33 0.287 0.60 0.810
0.5
5.5 9.17 0.311 0.67 0.866
6 10.00 0.349 0.67 0.934
6.5 10.83 0.416 0.73 0.969
7 11.67 0.429 0.78 0.977
7.5 12.50 0.459 0.82 0
1.033
0 5 10 15 20
8 13.33 0.549 0.84 1.061
8.5 14.17 0.569 0.88 1.139
9 15.00 0.611 0.88 1.168
9.5 15.83 0.611 0.88 STRAIN, %
1.168
10 16.67 0.611 0.86 1.168

29
Client: L&T CONSTRUCTION
Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3
LOCATION : 313/2-3
Sample Drawn by SKW SOIL &SURVEY CO. BH NO : 3
Sample SPT2 Depth: 4.5 -4.95 m
Tested by NOBLE GEO STRUCTS, MULUND(W), MUMBAI.
Normal Stress Kg/cm2 0 1 1.5 2

Shear Stress Kg/cm2 0 0.65 0.97 1.29

Cohesion kg/cm2 0 φ 33 degree

Direct shear test

2.5

2
τ , Shear stress (Kg/cm2)

1.5

0.5

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

σ,Normal Stress (Kg/cm2 )

30
 DIRECT SHEAR TEST
CLIENT:L&T CONSTRUCTION
Project: Geotechnical Investigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3

Location: 313/2-3 BH No. 3

Height of the specim en = 2 cm SAMPLE ID. (SPT2)

Rate of strain = 1.25 mm /min. Area of the specim en = 36 s q. cm

Depth = 4.5 m L.C. of srain dial gauge = 0.01

Mois ture Content(%) 18.47 Bulk Density(g/cc) 1.9

Norm al stress(kg/cm 2) σ1 σ1.5 σ2.0 2

DIRECT SHEAR TEST
Strain Dial 2
τ Shear stress(kg/cm ) σ1 σ1.5 σ2.0
readg.m m Strain %
0 0 0 0.00 0.000
0.5 0.83 0.086 0.13 0.259
1 1.67 0.111 0.18 0.340 1.5
1.5 2.50 0.151 0.25 0.421
2 3.33 0.168 0.30

2
0.519

SHEAR STRESS Kg/cm

2.5 4.17 0.197 0.34 0.562
3 5.00 0.248 0.39 0.644 1
3.5 5.83 0.274 0.46 0.734
4 6.67 0.303 0.52 0.825
4.5 7.50 0.306 0.58 0.881
5 8.33 0.347 0.63 0.944
0.5
5.5 9.17 0.370 0.67 0.985
6 10.00 0.414 0.73 1.023
6.5 10.83 0.426 0.78 1.080
7 11.67 0.488 0.86 1.135
7.5 12.50 0.512 0.89 0
1.161
0 5 10 15 20
8 13.33 0.544 0.92 1.192
8.5 14.17 0.600 0.95 1.198
9 15.00 0.614 0.97 1.265
9.5 15.83 0.652 0.97 STRAIN, %
1.293
10 16.67 0.629 0.97 1.276

31
3
2
1
SL.N
No.
Client:
Project:

SUBJECT:
Sample ID/N-Value/[Link].
LOCATION :
Bore Hole No:

SPT-2
SPT-1

ROCK (9)
4

Sample Description
313/2-3

Silty Sand

Mica Schist
IS Code Reference
Depth (M)
LABORATORY TEST

0.00-11.20

11.20-12.00
SAMPLE DROWN BY : SKW SOIL &SURV
L & T CONSTRUCTION

Gravel (%)

7.5
5.6
Sand (%)

82.6
80.7
IS:2720 (Part-4) - 1985
Silt (%)

9.9
13.7
Grain Size Analysis
TESTED BY: NOBLE GEO STRUCTS, MULUND(W), MUMBAI.

Clay (%)

0.0
0.0
Liquid (%)

Plastic (%) IS:2720 (Part-5) - 1985

NP
NP
Atterberg Limit

Plastic Index(%)

IS Classification IS: 1498 -1970

SM

SP-SM
Bulk Density (g/cc) By Calculation

2.54
Specific Gravity IS:2720 (Part-4) 1980

2.57
2.68
2.67
TEST CERTIFICATE

Moisture content (%) IS:2720 (Part-5) 1985

Cohesion Intercept
( c ) (kg/cm2 )
IS:2720 (Part-5) 1985
Angle of Internal Friction
(Degrees)
Geotechnical Investigation for Structur Location for WDFCC Package 1 & 2 Section 2 & 3

Direct Shear Test

pH IS: 2720 (Part 26) 1982

Soluble Sulphate (%) IS: 2720 (Part -27) 1982

Oragnic Matter (%) IS: 2720 (Part -22) 1983

Chemical Analysis

Soluble Chloride (%) IS: 2720 (Part -23) 1984

Unconfined Compressive
-

IS:9143-1979
Strength(Mpa)

Point Load Strength

IS:8764-1998
1.25

Index (Mpa)

Porosity (%) IS:13030-1991

1.44
Rock testing

Water Absorbtion(%) IS:13030-1991

0.28
CLIENT : L&T
PROJECT : Geo Technical investigation work for DFCC Western Corridor , Rajastan
LOCATION : 313/2-3 (BH 4)
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL

100

80
percent passing,%

60

40

20
BH 4/SPT1

BH4/SPT2

0
0.001 0.01 0.1 sieve size,mm 1 10

BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % [Link] NMC % DD g/cc
BH 4/SPT1 1.50 5.61 80.73 13.66 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.67 - -
BH4/SPT2 3.00 7.50 82.60 9.90 0.00 NP NP NP NP 2.68 - -

33
PROJECT: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR STRUCTURE LOCATION FOR
WDFCCPACKAGE 1 & 2 SECTION 2 & 3

SKW SOIL SURVEY CO.

34
 Annexure 4

General Arrangement Drawing

Doc No.: DOC/CTP2/DGN/GB/208 - Rev.0