0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views1 page

SOLID Principles Interview Reference

The document outlines the SOLID principles of software design, which include the Single Responsibility Principle, Open/Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. Each principle is defined with its goal and benefits, emphasizing maintainability, safety in feature upgrades, prevention of unexpected behavior, cleanliness of classes, and decoupling of components. These principles serve as guidelines for creating robust and flexible software systems.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views1 page

SOLID Principles Interview Reference

The document outlines the SOLID principles of software design, which include the Single Responsibility Principle, Open/Closed Principle, Liskov Substitution Principle, Interface Segregation Principle, and Dependency Inversion Principle. Each principle is defined with its goal and benefits, emphasizing maintainability, safety in feature upgrades, prevention of unexpected behavior, cleanliness of classes, and decoupling of components. These principles serve as guidelines for creating robust and flexible software systems.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SOLID Principles - Interview Reference

Principle Full Form Definition Goal Benefit

SRP Single Responsibility A class should have only one responsibility One reason to Better maintainabil

Principle or reason to change. change

OCP Open/Closed Principle Software entities should be open for Extend, don't modify Safer feature upgra

extension but closed for modification.

LSP Liskov Substitution Subclasses should be replaceable for their Subtypes work as Prevents unexpect

Principle base classes without breaking the program base

behavior.

ISP Interface Segregation Clients should not be forced to depend on Use only needed Keeps classes fo

Principle methods they do not use. interfaces clean

DIP Dependency Inversion High-level modules should not depend on Depend on Decouples compon

Principle low-level modules. Both should depend on abstractions

abstractions.

Page 1

You might also like