Disclaimer
Answer correct-a nu check pannikkonga
By: Aadarsh Vivek Mitra
(Only for paper 5984-24 LLB. Remaining questions are for BALLB)
Question Paper: May 2024 – 5984-24
Question 8
Self-employment – Repeated question.
Refer previous answers
Question 9
Repeated.
Refer previous answer
Relevant Section: Sec 202 – Indian Contract Act, 1872
Point: Cannot revoke the agency
Question 10
Repeated
Relevant Section: Sec 15 – Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Case Law: Nicholson and Venn v. Smith Marriott
Question Paper: May 2024 – 6005-24
Question 8
Relevant Section: Sec 154 – Indian Contract Act, 1872
Point: B is liable for unauthorized use under bailment
Question 9 & 10
Already written
Question Paper: May 2023 – 5682-23
Question 8
Section: Sec 170 – Bailee’s particular lien, Indian Contract
Act, 1872
Point: B can retain the TV for repair charge under Sec 170
Question 9
Repeated
Section: Sec 15 – Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Case Law: Varley v. Whipp
Point: Reaping machine not compliant with sale description
– can return
Question 10
Section: Sec 2(7) – Consumer Protection Act, 2019
Case Law: Laxmi Engineering Works v. PSG Industrial
Institute
Explanation: Goods purchased for business = Not self-
employment = Not a consumer
Question Paper: November 2023 – 5886-33
Question 8
Provision: Sec 2(11) – Deficiency in service, Consumer
Protection Act, 2019
Case Laws:
Spring Meadows Hospital v. Harjol Ahluwalia – Son
died due to wrong treatment, compensation upheld
Arvind Shah (Dr.) v. Kamlaben Kushwaha –
Compensation awarded
Conclusion: Yes, Raman can file in Consumer Redressal
Commission
Question 9
Section: Sec 124 – Contract of Indemnity, Indian Contract
Act, 1872
Explanation: Defined and applied
Question 10
Section: Sec 220 – Indian Contract Act, 1872
Point: No remuneration for agent in case of misconduct
Question Paper: December 2022 – 5388-22
Question 8
Section: Sec 156 – Bailee’s duty to separate goods
Section: Sec 157 – Compensation if not separated
Question 9
Section: Sec 16(1) – Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Case Law: Priest v. Last
: Breach of implied condition as to quality and fitness –
compensation to be given
Question 10
Part (a): Yes, nominee is a consumer (Sec 2(7), CPA 2019)
Sec 2 (42) service : comes under service so nominee is
consumer
Sec 2 (11) deficiency in service
Part (b): Yes, public authority service receiver is consumer
Public authority comes under definition service sec 2 (42) so
liable
Case Law: Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir
Singh
Judgment says people should not be made run from
pillar to post for seeking public service in government
office.
Question Paper: February 2022 – 5042-21
Question 8
Repeated
Question
: Agency by necessity between husband and wife
If the husband and wife living in same house then agency by
necessity is applicable for purchase of necessary items for basic
needs.
If they are not living in the same house due to matrimonial
disputes then Matrimonial Proceedings & Property Act, 1970
applied initially but now Maintenance of necessity is governed by
personal laws.
Question 10
Section: Sec 50 – Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Case Law: Whitehead v. Anderson
Decision : Yes, Mahesh can stop goods in transit
Question Paper: February 2022 – 5083-21
Question 7
Repeated
Question 8
Section: Sec 163 – Duty to deliver increase/profit of goods
bailed
CASE LAW :
Standard chartered bank V. Custodian ( bonus shares,
divident cannot be retained for pledges shares)
Decision : so A can get the puppy also similar to the case
law.
Question 9
Repeated
Section: Sec 15 – Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Implied condition in sale by description
Case Law: Nicholson & Venn v. Smith Marriott
Question 10
Section: Sec 178-A – Indian Contract Act, 1872
Case Law: Phillips v. Brooks
DECISION : pledge bought in good faith is valid until it
become void contract which from undue influence. ( Voidable
contract) pledge of stolen goods is void
Question 11
Section: Sec 14 – Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Case Law: Foster v. Hale
Point: Property bought in partner’s name with firm money
belongs to the firm only
Question 12
Section: Sec 30 – Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Point: yes minor's share is attached to pay the firm's loss
Question Paper: June 2022 – 5211-22
Question 8
Section: Sec 149 – Agent’s duty
Case Law: Ultzen v. Nichols
Sec 71 – Finder of goods
Sec 161 – Bailee liable for loss
Sec 238 – Principal liable for agent
Conclusion: B liable for employee’s act
Question 9
Section: Sec 26 – Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Point: Loss for shop owner; agreement to sell, not sale
Question 10
Section: Sec 16(1) – Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Case Law: Frost v. Aylesbury Dairy Co
Question Paper: January 2021 – 4602-20
Question 8
Section: Sec 216 – Principal’s right against agent
Case Law: De Bussche v. Alt
Question 9
Section: Sec 147 – Co-surety liability – Equal share
Question 10
Repeated
Question Paper: November 2019 – 4415-19
Question 8
Repeated
Question 9
Section: Sec 150 – Bailor’s duty
Case Law: Hyman v. Nye & Sons (1881)
Question 10
Section: Sec 128 – Surety's liability
Case Law: Narayan Singh v. Chatter Singh
Point: Surety not liable – Debt wiped by Debt Relief Act
Question Paper: November 2018 – 3982-18
All questions repeated
Question Paper: May 2017 – 3558-17
Question 7, 8, 9
Repeated
Question 10
Section: Sec 20 – Implied authority, Indian Partnership Act,
1932
Point: C not bound; remaining partners liable under Sec 13
Question 11
Section: Sec 148 – Bailment
Case Law: Kaliaperumal v. Visalakshmi
Point: Owner’s control = No bailment
Question 12
Section: Sec 194 – Substituted agent
Point: C is substituted agent, not sub-agent
Question Paper: November 2017 – 3644-17
Question 7, 8, 9, 10
Repeated
Question 11
Section: Sec 16(1) – Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Case Law: Chaproniere v. Mason
Question 12
Section: Sec 31(2) – Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Point: New partner not liable for old debts
If you want this arranged content exported as a PDF, let me know
—I can generate that next.