IJSDP Manuscript
IJSDP Manuscript
Planning
Vol., No., Month, Year, pp. **-**
Journal homepage: [Link]
Greening the Cityscape: Strategies for Sustainable Urbanization, Low Carbon Emissions,
and Robust Economic Growth
Amira Houaneb 1* , Uzma Khan2 , Aarif Mohammad Khan3
1
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, College of Business Administration, Al-kharj, KSA11942 Email:
[Link]@[Link]; [Link]@[Link] ORCID: 0000-0002-7790-8944
2
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, College of Business Administration, Al-kharj, KSA 11942 Email:
uzmakhanafridi@[Link]; [Link]@[Link] ORCID: 0000-0002-7248-090X
3
Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India 202002 Email: khanaarifeco@[Link] ORCID: 0000-0002-7190-6518
Copyright: ©2024 The author(s). This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license
([Link]
[Link]
ABSTRACT
[Link]
Received: This study thoroughly investigates the intricate association concerning urbanization, energy
Revised: consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in Saudi Arabia from 1968 to 2022.
Accepted: Using advanced econometric models and time-series data analysis, we reveal a complex
association in which economic growth and urbanization influence energy consumption,
Available online:
leading to increased carbon emissions. The adjustment coefficients for this relationship are
estimated to be 0.16%. The causality test findings revealed the existence of both
Keywords: unidirectional and bidirectional causality. Urbanization has a direct impact on both energy
Carbon emissions, Economic Growth, consumption and carbon emissions. In turn, carbon emissions affect both energy use and
Energy consumption, VECM, Al-Kharj economic growth. Ultimately, carbon emissions influence both energy consumption and
economic growth. Our results highlight the urgent need for strategies to reduce carbon
emissions by implementing sustainable energy practices, urban planning, and legislative
measures. These implications for sustainable development are crucial for Saudi Arabia and
offer a structure for other rapidly urbanizing nations dealing with comparable difficulties.
Given the potential for change, policymakers must carefully consider and implement these
results.
Energy Use
Selection of the Variables
This can also be constituted in a log-linear econometric Economic Growth Data Selection 1968-2022
structure as:
Urbanization
Yes
Pairwise Granger
Causality Test
The Long-run model can be expressed as: Conclusion, Limitations, Future Research Prospects
LNC represents the lag value of carbon emissions, LNG A comprehensive descriptive statistics analysis and
represents economic growth, LNE represents the lag value of correlation coefficient matrix are displayed in Table 1. The
energy consumption, LNU represents the log value of several matrix emphasizes the following four variables: Urbanization
(LNU), economic growth (LNG), carbon emissions (LNC),
urbanizations, ҩ is the coefficient, and u represents the error.
and energy consumption (LNE). The 'Mean' denotes the
Stationarity tests, a complex yet essential aspect of
arithmetic average of each variable; LNU is 16.3, LNC and
econometrics and statistics, are commonly used to determine
LNE are both 5.4, and LNG is 26.6. The 'Median' denotes the
the order of integration for each variable within a system. A
central values of the datasets, which correspond
wide range of tests, each with its intricacies, are used in
approximately to the norms of LNG (26.6) and LNE (5.4). In
analytical and empirical research to assess the integration
contrast, LNU has a median score of 16.5, whereas LNC has
order, considering various factors. In our systematic
a marginally higher median score of 5.5. The terms
empirical stationarity analysis, we will delve into the
'Minimum' and 'Maximum' denote the upper and lower limits
complexities of the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and
of the observations within each dataset. As an illustration, the
Phillips-Perron tests while considering intercepts. After the
LNU dataset spans from 14.7 to 17.2, whereas the LNC
unit root test, we will proceed with the co-integration test by
dataset spans from 4.1 to 6.5. The final statistical metric,
Johansen co-integration. If the co-integration is present, we
standard deviation, measures the degree of dispersion or
will proceed with the Vector Error Correction Model
variation relative to the mean. The values in this instance
(VECM). If not, we will use the Vector Autoregressive
vary between 0.28 (LNE) and 0.75 (LNC), signifying distinct
Model (VAR). If co-integration is present, we will go for the
degrees of dispersion among the datasets. The analysis of the
further estimation of long- and short-term estimates; the error
correlation coefficient matrix indicates that the variables
correction term can be estimated as:
exhibit a strong positive coefficient correlation. Table 1
ECT t −1=[ Y t−1−η j χ t −1−ξ m Rt −1 ] (5) presents a comprehensive summary of each variable's central
Furthermore, this study employs the vector error correction tendency, variability, range of values, and correlation matrix,
model framework to ascertain the causal direction among lnc, furnishing abundant information about the dataset's attributes.
lne, lng, and lnu. Equation 6 examines the causal relationship
between the variables under consideration. Where ECT Table 1: Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficient matrix
represents the error correction term, σ represents the first L L L L
difference, and φ represents the white noise residual ∂, which Vari Me Me M Mini Std. N N N N
signifies the direction of short-term causality. able an dian ax. mum Dev. C E G U
[ ][] [ ][ ][ ] [ ]
6.
lnct θ1 ∂11 ∂12 ∂13 ∂14 lnc t−n ω 1 φ
LNC 5.4 1 5.5 5 4.1 0.75 1
m
lnet θ ∂21 ∂22 ∂23 ∂24 lne t−n ω 2 φ2 5. 0.
σ = 2 +∑ σ n + [ ECT
LNE t−1 + ]
5.4 . .(6) 8
5.4 4.8 0.28 98 1
lng t θ3 n =1 ∂31 ∂32 ∂33 ∂34 lng t−n ω 3 LN 26.φ3 27 0. 0.
lnu t θ4 ∂41 ∂42 ∂43 ∂44 lnu t−n ω 4 G 6 φ 26.6 .4
4
25 0.52 88 8 1
LN 16. 17 0. 0. 0.
U 3 16.5 .2 14.7 0.73 98 93 9 1
Table 2 shows the results of the unit root test, which is a part
of the Augmented-Dicky Fuller test and the Phillips-Perron
test, which are used to figure out if the series is stationary or
not and at what level, i.e., at I (0), I (1) and I (2) level. The
series for carbon emissions from energy stopped changing at
I (1) levels for both tests. This means the series for carbon
emissions has become stationary at the first level. Moreover, The significant co-integration test result at the 0.05 level
a similar finding exists for energy consumption and economic indicates the presence of both short-run and long-run
growth. Furthermore, the urbanization series became connections between carbon dioxide emissions from energy,
stationary at I (0) levels by the Phillips-Perron test. However, primary energy consumption, economic growth, and
the ADF indicates that the series became stationary at the urbanization. The normalized co-integrating coefficient
second level, further supported by the PP test. This shows succinctly captures this relationship as:
that the series has reached a point where it is stationary at the lnc=0.65 lne+ 0.29lng +0.71 lnu
second order of difference. Due to this second order of Our objective is to examine whether the long-term changes in
difference, we will not use the ARDL bound test. carbon dioxide emissions from energy (lnc), energy
consumption (lne), economic growth (lng), and urbanization
Table 2: Unit Root Test (lnu) positively and statistically significantly influence this
ADF. Phillips-Perron variable. The results have significant implications: a one
Variable Level Prob percent increase in energy consumption corresponds to a 0.65
t-statistic Prob. Adj. t-stat. percent increase in carbon dioxide emissions from energy.
.
I (0) -0.93 0.77 -1.03 0.74 Similarly, urbanization exhibits a comparable impact, leading
LNC to a 0.71 percentage point increase in urban-related carbon
I (1) -8.13 0.00* -8.37 0.0* dioxide emissions for every percentage of urban growth.
I (0) -0.71 0.83 -0.63 0.85 Notably, carbon dioxide emissions from economic growth
LNE
I (1) -8.54 0.00* -8.61 0.0* display a positive correlation with carbon consumption,
0.02* indicating that a percentage change in economic growth leads
I (0) -3.27 -2.83 0.06 to a change in carbon emissions level by 0.29 percent. These
LNG *
I (1) -5.2 0.0* -5.3 0.0* findings, supported by Johansen's co-integration test,
underscore the urgent need to address these factors to
I (0) -2.56 0.11 -12.9 0.0* mitigate carbon dioxide emissions.
LNU I (1) -1.34 0.6 -1.02 0.74 The error correction coefficient, a vital measure of the
0.01 model's precision, gives the speed of adjustments with which
I (2) -6.03 0.0* -3.5
* the model will restore its equilibrium following any
*, ** represents 1&5% significance level source; Authors disturbances. The coefficient of ECT with lnc as a dependent
computation variable is negative and statistically significant, indicating a
convergence from short dynamics towards long-run
equilibrium. The adjustment coefficients are 0.16 percent,
Following the unit root test, we delve deeper into the models
respectively, towards long-run equilibrium in a
using a second-order lag. Table 3 showcases the results of the
disequilibrium situation, further reinforcing the robustness of
Johansen co-integration test, a pivotal step in our analysis.
our model.
The asterisk (*) mark indicates that at least one series has a
Short-term changes ultimately lead to long-term balance. The
co-integration, which denotes both long-term and short-term
statistically significant and negative coefficients for economic
effects. This finding paves the way for the vector error
growth, urban expansion, carbon dioxide emissions from
correction model (VECM), a powerful tool in our analysis,
energy use, and primary energy consumption support this. In
demonstrating our research's practical relevance and
cases of prolonged imbalance, the adjustment coefficients
applicability.
were 0.16%. The short-run equation model can be
represented and written using the following notation:
Table 3 Johansen Co-integration Test for LNG as a dependent
variable ∆ lnc t=−0.16 ECT t−1−0.11lnc t−1−0.01 lnet −1−0.16 lngt −1
Max- Pr
Eig Trace 0.05
Prob Eigen
0.05
ob
With a negative ECT, we can infer that primary energy
env Statis Critica Critica consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions from
.** Statisti .*
alue tics l Value l Value energy use all have a long-run causal relationship. A negative
cs *
0. sign for the coefficient indicates the ability to return to
No 0.5 0.00
69.4 47.86 42.95 27.58 00 equilibrium. According to the short-run coefficient, there was
ne* 6 02
03 an increase in carbon emissions from the previous year.
At Carbon emissions are expected to rise by 1.1 percent. As
0.2 0.
mos 26.45 29.8 0.12 17.13 21.13 primary energy consumption rises, carbon emissions from
8 17
t 1*
power plants will also increase by 1 percent. For every
At
mos
0.1
9.32 15.49 0.34 6.42 14.26
0. percentage point of economic growth, carbon emissions from
1 56 the energy sector will increase by 1.6%, and urban growth in
t2
At the short run reveals a decrease in carbon emissions of 8.4
0.0 0. percent. This might be due to sustainable urban planning.
mos 2.90 3.84 0.09 2.9 3.84
53 09
t3
LNC LNE LNG LNU Table 4 Robustness Check by Co-integration Regression
1 -0.65 -0.29 -0.71 Variable FMOLS DOLS CCR
0.14 0.06 0.112 0.0
LNE 1.29 1.25 0.00 1.31 0.00
0
**MacKinnnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values
0.0 0.0
Source; Authors Computations LNG 0.16 0.24 0.15 0.00
0 0
0.0 0.0
LNU 0.44 0.28 0.44 0.00
0 0
0.0 0.0
C -13.04 -12.3 -12.9 0.00
0 0
2
Adj R 0.99 0.99 0.99
Jarque-Bera 2.71 0.26 1.78 0.41 1.48 0.48
C; Co-integration coefficient deterministic; * represents 1 per
cent of significance level
Source: Author Computation
Figure 1 depicts the Granger Causality Test, where *and **
represent the 5% and 1 % significance levels, respectively.
When we do the analysis, we will also use the fully modified
ordinary least squares (FMOLS), dynamic ordinary least Figure 1 visually represents the pairwise Granger causality
squares (DOLS), and Canonical Co-integration Regression test results, revealing both unidirectional and bidirectional
(CCR) methods for co-integration regression. This will make causality. A key finding is the unidirectional relationship
our results even more reliable. These methods are frequently between carbon emissions, energy consumption, and
employed in econometrics to examine the enduring economic development. We also identify a bidirectional
connections between variables. The findings of a co- causal relationship between energy consumption and
integration regression analysis using FMOLS, DOLS and economic growth. Furthermore, a unidirectional causal
CCR methods are presented in Table 4. The dependent relationship exists between urbanization carbon emissions
variable in this analysis is carbon emissions. The model aims and energy consumption. The significance of the Breusch-
to elucidate the relationship between carbon emissions and Godfrey serial correlation LM test, the Breusch-Pagan-
other variables. Within this framework, the variable in Godfrey heteroscedasticity test, and the Jarque-Bera
question is the dependent variable. The regression model normality test cannot be overstated. These tests are crucial in
includes independent variables such as energy consumption, validating our analysis, confirming the absence of serial
economic growth, urbanization, and carbon emissions. They correlation and homoscedasticity and the normal distribution
are indicators of variables that could impact carbon of the series, and instilling confidence in the reliability of our
emissions. findings.
Our significant statistical findings reveal that the energy
consumption coefficient is 1.29. This suggests that a carbon 5. CONCLUSION
emission increase of 1.29 units is associated with every one-
unit increase in energy consumption. The coefficients for Global concerns regarding climate change and the associated
economic growth (0.16) and urbanization (0.44) both indicate adversities have manifested the necessity for achieving
positive correlations. The constant term (C) is -13.04, a environmentally sustainable growth by phasing out the
concerning value. Importantly, all exogenous variables are traditional trade-off between economic gains and
significant at the 1% level, providing robust evidence for our environmental losses. In this regard, reducing carbon
analysis. emissions has become a significant concern worldwide.
Our findings continue to underscore the positive correlation Although the issue of establishing low-carbon economic
between the variables. The energy consumption coefficient is growth has been widely acknowledged in the Paris
1.25, suggesting a direct relationship. The coefficient Agreement and the SDG declarations of the United Nations
associated with economic growth is 0.24, indicating a [9], not much emphasis has been devoted to the literature on
positive correlation with the variable of interest. Similarly, identifying the macroeconomic factors influencing the level
the coefficient for urbanization is also positive, at 0.28. All of carbon emissions. Hence, this current study attempted to
exogenous variables are statistically significant at the 1% evaluate the effects of energy consumption, economic
significance level, with the constant term (C) having a value growth, and urbanization on the carbon productivity levels in
of -12.3. These results emphasize the urgent need to address Saudi Arabia and in the Al-Kharj Municipal Region, a region
these issues. known for its rapid urbanization and significant contribution
According to the CCR coefficients, the energy consumption to the country's carbon emissions. In addition, further
coefficient is 1.31, indicating a positive correlation. Given addressing the literature gap and if energy efficiency gains
that the coefficient for economic growth is 0.15, there is a indirectly influence carbon productivity levels by
positive correlation between the variable of interest and the moderating/mediating the impacts of other macroeconomic
coefficient for urbanization (0.44). All exogenous variables factors on carbon productivity, this study also focused on
investigated in this study are statistically significant at the 1% unearthing and estimating these effects. Therefore, the
level, meaning they strongly influence carbon emissions. The present study was meticulously designed to develop a
constant term (C) is -12.9, indicating the expected value of comprehensive strategy for investigating the
carbon emissions when all other variables are zero, which is interrelationships among carbon emissions, economic growth,
harmful. energy consumption, and urbanization in the context of Saudi
The robustness of our model is evident in the high R-squared Arabia at a macro level spanning 1968–2022.
and adjusted R-squared values (0.995 and 0.994 for CCR, Our findings on the harmful energy consumption-CO2
0.998 and 0.997 for DOLS, and 0.995 and 0.994 for emissions tightening (ECT) indicate a long-term causal
FMOLS). These values indicate that the independent relationship between primary energy consumption, economic
variables can explain a significant portion of the variation in growth, and carbon emissions from energy use. Importantly,
carbon emissions, demonstrating a solid fit of the model to these findings offer hope. The negative coefficient suggests a
the data. The Jarque-Bera test further underscores the tendency to return to equilibrium, implying that we can steer
importance of our findings. these factors towards a more sustainable path with the right
interventions. The short-term coefficient, however, shows a
3.5* Economic Growth
Energy consumption
8.7**
Urbanization
3
.
9
*
rise in carbon emissions from the previous year, projecting an specific results to overall panel outcomes using advanced
increase of 1.1 percent. As primary energy consumption econometric methodologies and panel estimations. These
increases, carbon emissions from power plants are expected comparisons could offer valuable insights, emphasizing the
to rise by 1 percent. necessity for a more comprehensive understanding of
Similarly, for every percentage point of economic growth, environmental degradation.
carbon emissions from the energy sector are projected to
increase by 1.6%. However, amidst these projections, short- 6.1 RECOMMENDATION
term urban growth indicates an 8.4% decrease in carbon
emissions, possibly due to sustainable urban planning. This Redirecting investments towards more miniature cities and
finding underscores the potential for change and the towns, which still need to be saturated with job creation and
importance of sustainable practices in our urban areas, congestion, holds immense potential. Our study strongly
instilling optimism for the future. advocates for a shift from Riyadh to the Al-Kharj region.
Furthermore, we conducted a robustness test using co- This moves promises to relieve the strain on megacities and
integration regression analysis by FMOLS, DOLS, and CCR. foster more balanced regional development, instilling a sense
These regression analyses reveal that energy consumption is of optimism for a brighter future.
the most common, urbanization is second, and economic Implementing and spreading automated energy control
growth stands last in causing carbon emissions. At the end, systems in the residential sector is crucial for energy
we conduct a pairwise Granger causality test to reveal the conservation. However, it is equally important to underscore
direction of causality, indicating both unidirectional and the pivotal role of public knowledge and effective policies.
bidirectional. The relationship between carbon emissions and We can significantly reduce energy usage and emissions by
energy consumption is one-way causation, a robust finding promoting awareness and implementing policies that
supported by Al-Dhubaibi et al. [41]. Furthermore, the one- encourage energy conservation. This, coupled with adopting
way link between carbon emissions and economic growth, zero-emission buildings as the standard, can empower us to
which is supported by Bah & Azam [42] and Ali et al. [43], shape a more sustainable future.
and the two-way link between energy use and economic
growth, which was found and supported by Malik [44], Yuan
et al. [45], and Belloumi [46], make our research even more ACKNOWLEDGMENT
reliable.
The results of the Breusch-Godfrey serial correlation LM test, The authors extend their appreciation to Prince Sattam bin
the Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey heteroscedasticity test, and the Abdulaziz University for funding this research work through
Jarque-Bera normality test all show that our research method the project number PSAU/2024/02/28646)
is robust. These tests confirm the absence of serial
correlation, or homoscedasticity, and the normal distribution REFERENCES
of the series. This further strengthens the validity of our
findings on the unidirectional causal relationship between [1] United Nations (2016). Resolution adopted by the
urbanization, carbon emissions, and energy consumption. General Assembly on 23 December 2016. Available
from: [Link]
6. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH [Link] . Accessed 2024 May 27
[2] IEA (2024). Empowering Urban Energy Transitions
The findings of this study, delving into the dynamic interplay Smart cities and smart grids
of economic growth, energy consumption, and urbanization [Link]
on CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia, could have significant energy-transitions/executive-summary
implications for the fields of environmental economics and [3] Alam, M.S., (2006). Economic growth with energy.
econometrics. This study could act as a launching pad for MPRA Paper No. 1260. [Link]
further research in developing countries, employing different [Link]/1260/1/MPRA_paper_1260.pdf
econometric models. Additionally, future research could [4] Ojinnaka, I.J., (2008). Energy crisis in Nigeria, the
delve into growth determinants that still need to be addressed, role of natural gas. Bullion, The Publication of
such as forested areas, agricultural productivity, Central Bank of Nigeria, 22(4): 78-97.
globalization, technological innovation, trade openness, [Link]
financial development, foreign direct investments, [5] Khan Uzma (2023). Effects of Oil Consumption,
industrialization, and more. While this study focused on Urbanization, Economic Growth on Greenhouse Gas
carbon dioxide emissions as an indicator of environmental Emissions: India via Quantile Approach.
degradation, future studies could explore other measures, International Journal of Energy Economic Policy.
such as consumption-based carbon emissions or other 13(3), 171-176. [Link]
environmental emissions like nitrous oxide (N2O), sulfur [6] Raihan, A., Tuspekova, A. (2022), Toward a
dioxide (SO2), methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), sustainable environment: Nexus between economic
ground-level ozone (O3), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and other growth, renewable energy use, forested area, and
short-lived climate forces (SLCF), to further enhance carbon emissions in Malaysia. Resources,
environmental quality in Saudi Arabia. Conservation and Recycling Advances, 15, 200096.
Although carbon dioxide emissions are a crucial indicator [7] Zi, C., Jie, W., Hong-Bo, C. (2016), CO2 emissions
of environmental degradation, they are not the sole cause of and urbanization correlation in China based on
environmental pollution. This study could be enriched by threshold analysis. Ecological Indicators, 61(2), 193-
incorporating more environmental pollution indicators, such 201
as water and land pollution, in future research on Saudi [8] Murshed, M., Khan, U., Khan, A.M., Ozturk, I.
Arabia. Furthermore, future research could compare country- (2023), Can energy productivity gains harness the
carbon dioxide-inhibiting agenda of the Next 11 consumption and economic activity: empirical
countries? Implications for achieving sustainable evidence from India. Energy 2014; 66:324–31.
development. Sustainable Development, 31, 307- [22] Shahbaz M, Lean HH (2012). Does financial
320. development increase energy consumption? The role
[9] Khan, U., Khan, A.M., Khan, M.S., Ahmed, P., of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia.
Haque, A., Parvin, R.A. (2022), Are the impacts of Energy Policy 2012; 40:473–9.
renewable energy use on load capacity factors [Link]
homogeneous for developed and developing [23] Liu YB (2009). Exploring the Relationship between
nations? Evidence from the G7 and E7 nations. Urbanization and Energy Consumption in China
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Using ARDL (Autoregressive Distributed Lag) and
International, 30, 24629-24640. FDM (Factor Decomposition Model). Energy 2009;
[10] Murshed, M., Apergis, N., Alam, M.S., Khan, U., 34:1846–54.
Mahmud, S. (2022), The impacts of renewable [24] Mishra, V., Sharma, S.S., Smyth, R. (2009). Is
energy, financial inclusivity, globalization, economic development export-led or import-led in
economic growth, and urbanization on carbon the Pacific Island Countries? Evidence from panel
productivity: Evidence from net moderation and data models. Pacific Economic Bulletin 25, 46–63.
mediation effects of energy efficiency gains. [25] Shahbaz M, Sbia R, Hamdi H, Ozturk I (2014).
Renewable Energy, 196, 824-838. Economic growth, electricity consumption,
[11] Baz, K., Xu, D., Ali, H., Khan, U., Cheng, J., Abbas, urbanization and environmental degradation
K., Ali, I. (2022), Nexus of minerals-technology relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecol Indic
complexity and fossil fuels with carbon dioxide 2014; 45:622–31.
emission: Emerging Asian economies based on [26] Al-mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JYM. Sab, CNBC
product complexity index. Journal of Cleaner (2013). Exploring the relationship between
Production, 373, 133703. urbanization, energy consumption, and CO 2
[12] Raihan, A., Begum, R.A., Nizam, M., Said, M., emission in MENA countries. Renew Sustain
Pereira, J.J. (2022), Dynamic impacts of energy use, Energy Rev 2013; 23:107–12.
agricultural land expansion, and deforestation on [27] Li Ke, Lin Boqiang (2015). Impacts of urbanization
CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Environmental and and industrialization on energy consumption / CO2
Ecological Statistics, 29(3), 477-507. emissions: does the level of development matter?
[13] Murshed, M., Khan, U., Khan, A.M., Ozturk, I. Renew Sustain Energy Rev; 52:1107–22.
(2023a), Can energy productivity gains harness the [28] Wang Qiang, Wu Shi-dai, Zeng Yue-e, Wu Bo-wei
carbon dioxide-inhibiting agenda of the Next 11 (2016). Exploring the relationship between
countries? Implications for achieving sustainable urbanization, energy consumption, and CO2
development. Sustainable Development, 31(1), 307- emissions in different provinces of China. Renew
320. Sustain Energy Rev 2016; 54:1563–79.
[14] Yabo Zhao, Wang Shaojian (2015). The [29] Inmaculada, Martinez-Zarzoso, Maruotti Antonello
Relationship between Urbanization, Economic (2011). The impact of urbanization on CO2
Growth and Energy Consumption in China: an emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol
Econometric Perspective Analysis. Sustainability Econ 2011; 70:1344–53.
2015; 7:5609–27. [30] Richard, Y, Rosa EA. Dietz T (2003). STIRPAT,
[Link] IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the
[15] Wang ZH, Yin FC, Zhang YX, Zhang X (2012). An driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ
empirical research on the influencing factors of 2003:351–65.
regional CO 2 emissions: evidence from Beijing [31] Ying, Fan, Liu Lan-Cui, Wu Gang, Wei Yi-Ming
city, China. Appl Energy 2012; 100: 277–84. (2006). Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions
[16] Jones DW (1989). Urbanization and energy use in using the STIRPAT model. Environ Impact Assess
economic development. Energy J. 10:29–44. Rev 2006; 26:377–95.
[17] Jones DW (1991). How urbanization affects energy [32] Zhang C, Lin Y (2012). Panel estimation for
use in developing countries. Energy Policy, 19:621– urbanization, energy consumption and CO2
30. emissions: a regional analysis in China. Energy
[18] Dahl C, Erdogan M (1994). Oil demand in the Policy 2012; 49:488–98.
developing world: lessons from the 1980s applied to [33] Zhang, L., Li, Z., Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T.S.,
the 1990s. Energy J 1994;15: 69–78. Adeshola, I., Akinsola, G.D. (2021). Modeling CO2
[19] Parikh V, Shukla J (1995). Urbanization, energy use emissions in Malaysia: an application of Maki
and greenhouse effects in economic development: cointegration and wavelet coherence tests. Environ.
results from across-national study of developing Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28 (20), 26030–26044.
countries. Glob Environ Chang, 5:87–103. [Link]
[20] Lenzen M, Wier M, Cohen C, Hayami H, Pachauri [34] Adebayo, T.S., Kalmaz, D.B., (2021). Determinants
S, Schaeffer R (2006). A comparative multivariate of CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from Egypt.
analysis of household energy requirements in Environ. Ecol. Stat. 28 (2), 239–262.
Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan. Energy [Link] 020-00482-0.
2006; 31:181–207. [35] Nondo, C., Kahsai, M.S. (2020). The impact of
[21] Ghosh S, Kanjilal K (2014). Long-term equilibrium energy intensity, urbanisation, industrialisation, and
relationship between urbanization, energy income on CO2 emissions in South Africa: an
ARDL bounds testing approach. Afr. J. Econ.
Sustain. Dev. 7 (4), 307–330. [Link]
10.1504/AJESD.2020.106826.
[36] Kirikkaleli, D., Kalmaz, D.B. (2020). Testing the
moderating role of urbanization on the
environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence
from an emerging market. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
Int. 27 (30), 38169–38180. [Link]
s11356-020-09870-2.
[37] Islam, M.M., Khan, M.K., Tareque, M., Jehan, N.,
Dagar, V. (2021). Impact of globalization, foreign
direct investment, and energy consumption on CO2
emissions in Bangladesh: does institutional quality
matter? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28, 48851–
48871. [Link]
[38] Shaha F, Khan, AM, Zulfiqar, Z and Bafaqeer, SM
(2024) Saudi Arabia's Green Vision: Examining the
Kingdom's Path to Sustainability, Covering Energy,
Economy, Tourism, and Carbon Dynamics.
International Journal of Energy Economic and
Policy. 14(3). [Link]
[39] Khan Uzma (2023). Effects of Oil
Consumption, Urbanization, Economic Growth on
Greenhouse Gas Emissions: India via Quantile
Approach. International Journal of Energy
Economic Policy. 13(3), 171-176.
[Link]
[40] Khan, U., Khan, A.M., Khan, M.S., Ahmed, P.,
Haque, A., Parvin, R.A. (2022), Are the impacts of
renewable energy use on load capacity factors
homogeneous for developed and developing
nations? Evidence from the G7 and E7 nations.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
International, 30, 24629-24640.
[41] Al-Dhubaibi, A A S, Khan, AM, Sharaf-Addin, H H,
Solichin, M (2024). Strategic Integration: Fostering
Sustainability in Low-Income Country through
Poverty Alleviation, Carbon Efficiency, Energy and
Economic Resilience. International Journal of
Energy Economic Policy. 14(3), 524-532.
[Link]
[42] Bah, M.M., Azam, M. (2017), Investigating the
relationship between electricity consumption and
economic growth: Evidence from South Africa.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80,
531-537.
[43] Ali, W., Abdullah, A., Azam, M. (2017), Re-visiting
the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for
Malaysia: Fresh evidence from ARDL bounds
testing approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 77, 990-1000.
[44] Malik, M.A. (2021), Economic growth, energy
consumption, and environmental quality nexus in
Turkey: Evidence from simultaneous equation
models. Environmental Science and Pollution
Research, 28(31), 41988-41999
[45] Yuan, J., Zhao, C., Yu, S., Hu, Z. (2007), Electricity
consumption and economic growth in China:
Cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy
Economics, 29, 1179-1191
[46] Belloumi, M. (2009), Energy consumption and GDP
in Tunisia: Cointegration and causality analysis.
Energy Policy, 37, 2745-2753.