IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, UT.
CHANDIGARH
HMA Petition No.___________ of 2025
PARAMBIR SAHOTA S/O SH. HARMESH LAL R/O
H.NO.803-C SMALL FLAT DHANAS, UT.
CHANDIGARH.
…..Petitioner
Versus
TANISHQ KAUR RAJORIA D/O SH. DALWINDER
PAL RAJORIA R/O H.NO.1404/13, SECTOR 65
PHASE XI, SAS NAGAR MOHALI.
…..Respondent
PETITION under Section 9 of
the Hindu Marriage Act 1955
for restitution of Conjugal
rights.
……
Respectfully Showeth:
1. That the marriage of the petitioner was
solemnized with the Respondent on 6.10.2024
as per Sikh rites and ceremonies at
Gurudwara Sahib, Phase IX Mohali. An
affidavit to this effect is attached
herewith this petition.
2. That after the solemnization of the
marriage the respondent came to Matrimonial
house and out of wedlock no issue was born
out.
3. That it is further mentioned here that the
respondent/wife left the matrimonial home
on 14.3.2025 and presently she is residing
with her parents house without the consent
of the petitioner.
4. That the petitioner is doing Private job
and monthly salary of the petitioner is
Rs.12,000/- p.m. and the respondent is
doing job in Just Dial and getting salary
of Rs.25,000/- p.m.
5. That the petitioner and respondent lodged
a complaint against each other on 4.5.2025.
6. That it is pertinent to mention here that
the respondent threatened to the petitioner
to make a suicide and the respondent tried
the same so many times.
7. That the Police official of P.S. of
Police Station Sector 34 Chandigarh made a
pressure upon the petitioner to make a
compromise with the respondent.
8. That the petitioner called through mobile
phone to the respondent but the respondent
is not bothered the genuine request of the
petitioner. It is further mentioned that
the respondent kept all belongings
articles, jewellery etc who took with her
parents.
9. That it is further mentioned here that the
respondent kept all the dowry articles,
jewellery etc with her parents house.
10. That all efforts made by the petitioner
and his family have failed and the
respondent is not ready to come and join
the petitioner home.
11. That the cause of action arose in favour
of the petitioner firstly on in the month
of 14.3.2025 when the respondent left
petitioner home without intimation/consent
and she is not returning back without any
reason and with the intention not to come
back and the cause of action is continuing
thereafter, on each of the day when the
petitioner and his family members tried to
persuade the respondent but the respondent
refused to join the petitioner home.
12. That this Hon’ble court has territorial
jurisdiction to try and decide the matter.
13. That there is no other legal ground why
the relief claim in the petition should not
be granted to the petitioner.
14. That neither such or similar petition is
pending nor decided by any Court of law.
15. That the requisite court fee has been
affixed with the petition.
It is, therefore, respectfully prayed
that a decree for a restitution of Conjugal
rights may kindly be passed in favour of
the petitioner and against the respondent,
in the interest of justice.
Place : CHANDIGARH Petitioner
Dated : 13.05.2025
Through Counsel:-
(AMIT GUPTA)(BAKUL GARG)
ADVOCATES
COUNSELS FOT THE PETITIONER
VERIFICATION:
Verified that the contents of paras No.1 to
11 are true and correct to my knowledge and
rest of the paras No.11 to 15 are also true
and correct to my information received from
the counsel and believed to be correct.
Place : Chandigarh Petitioner
Dated : 13.5.2025
