Group 2 Mod II Cat Assignment
Group 2 Mod II Cat Assignment
GROUP MEMBERS
2.1.3 POLYGAMY
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Constitution provides for the equal rights of parties to a marriage at the time of
the marriage, during the marriage and at the dissolution of the marriage 2. It also
advocates for equality before the law where everyone has the right to equal protection
and equal benefit of the law 3.It also prohibits all forms of discrimination against a
1
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) (adopted 18 December
1979, entered into force 3 September 1981) 1249 UNTS 13
2
Article 45(3) of the Constitution of Kenya ,2010
3
Article 27 of the COK,2010
person on grounds such as sex4. 5
Article 28 provides for human dignity where
everyone has inherent dignity and has the right to have that dignity respected and
6
protected. Article 29 provides for the freedom and the security of a person where
everyone has a right not to be subjected to: any form of violence, torture in any
manner, or to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading manner.
The Marriage Act 2014 defines marriage as a voluntary union 10 Societal pressures,
cultural expectations, and family coercion often undermine genuine consent. 11 Chinua
Achebe’s Things Fall Apart depicts marriage as a transaction where women's consent
is secondary to male authority In AOW v GMK [2011] eKLR, the court annulled a
marriage where evidence showed lack of consent, reinforcing that consent must be
free and full12.
Section 5 of the Kadhis’ Court Act (Cap 11)13 gives Kadhis’ courts jurisdiction over
personal matters of Muslim parties. The impact of section 49(3) of these provisions is
that Muslim women are excluded from the benefits guaranteed under the Constitution
4
ibid
5
The constitution of Kenya,2010
6
Ibid
7
Article 16(1) (b), CEDAW.
8
9
Articles 45(2) of the c.o.k.,2010
10
Marriage Act 2014 (Kenya), s 3(2).
11
Chinua Achebe, *Things Fall Apart* (Heinemann 1958)
12
AOW v GMK [2011] eKLR
13
Kadhis’ Court Act (Chapter 11), Laws of Kenya.
and the Marriage Act, 2014, which recognize the equality of men and women in
marriage. This means that Muslim women are governed by sharia law, which
occasions discrimination in marriage.14
The CEDAW Committee has observed that “a woman’s right to choose a spouse and
enter freely into marriage is central to her life and to her dignity and equality as a
human being”15.
Kenya has come up with legislation to curb child marriages as seen in the Sexual
Offences Act16, the Marriage Act17 where section 4 prescribes the minimum age of
marriage as eighteen and the Children’s Act18.The Maputo Protocol guarantees that no
marriage shall take place without the free and full consent of both parties and that the
minimum age of marriage for women shall be 18 years 19. Section 4 of the marriage
act expressly stipulates that: “A person shall not marry unless that person has attained
the age of eighteen years.” In fact, the Act recognizes that marriages contracted with a
person below the minimum age of marriage are void. 20 This is consistent with Article
16(2) of CEDAW, which recognizes that betrothal and the marriage of a child shall
have no legal effect. It is an offence to marry a person below the age of 18 years with
a prescribed imprisonment term of five years or a fine not exceeding Ksh 1 million.21
However, in as much as there are vast legal reforms protecting the female gender from
harmful practices, some communities which are deeply rooted to their traditions, still
subject their girls to early marriages making it evident that these laws are not
effectively implemented to protect girls. Child marriage has been associated with;
polygamous marriage, increased school drop-out rates and high adolescent and
14
Samia Bano, “In pursuit of religious and legal diversity: a response to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the
‘Sharia debate’ in Britain”, Ecclesiastical Law Journal 10 (2008) p. 283.
15
CEDAW Committee, General Recommendation 21 on equality in marriage and family relations (1994), para. 16
16
Sexual Offences Act, No. 3 of 2006
17
Section 11, Marriage Act, CAP 150
18
Children’s Act, No. 29 of 2022
19
Article 6(a) and (b), Maputo Protocol.
20
Section 11(1) (a), Marriage Act, 2014.
21
Section 87, Marriage Act, 2014.
maternal mortality.22 Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), although banned in Kenya, is
considered as a rite of passage in certain communities which is closely linked to early
marriages where girls who have undergone this practice, notwithstanding their young
age, are viewed as ready for marriage thereby giving rise to child brides. Statistics
have shown that amongst urban women aged 25 - 49 years, at least 30 percent of them
got married before attaining age 18 and in the rural and marginalized areas the
proportion was above 50 percent.23
2.1.3 Polygamy
Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o’s The River Between portrays how polygamy constrains women’s
agency24 In SMW v MGS [2015] eKLR, the court emphasized the importance of
protecting women's rights in polygamous settings25.
The Penal Code awards the liability, trial or punishment of a person for any offence
against the common law or against any other law in Kenya hence plays a major role in
addressing gender discrimination in personal safety by criminalizing offences based
on Gender-based violence (GBV), including rape, female genital mutilation (FGM),
and intimate partner violence.
The Protection Against Domestic Violence Act seeks to provide for the protection and
relief of the victims of domestic violence. It also provides mechanisms for victims to
seek protection orders and legal redress. The act also seeks to protect victims of
domestic violence by giving them freedom to apply to the court for a protection order
in respect of that other person26.
22
Collaborating Organizations: Population Studies and Research Institute, National Council for Population and
Development, UNFPA ‘Youth: Curbing Early Marriage Improves their Prospects’ Policy Brief No. 37 September
2013
23
2008-09 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey
24
Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o, *The River Between* (Heinemann 1965)
25
SMW v MGS [2015] eKLR.
26
Protection Against Domestic Violence Act, CAP 151, section 8
In the case of C.K( a child) & 11 others v Commissioner of Police/ Inspector
General of the National Police Service & 2 Others [2012] eKLR a group of young
girls, aged between 5 and 15 years, were challenging the government on its inaction
regarding the sexual abuse of children. The girls were on diverse dates between the
year 2008 and 2012 victims of defilement and other forms of Sexual violence and
child abuse. They had reported their complaints at various police stations within Meru
County, however, the police officers at those various Police Stations neglected,
omitted, refused, and failed to conduct prompt, effective and proper investigations
into the petitioners’ complaints. They also failed to or visit the crime scenes or
interview the witnesses or collect and preserve evidence. As a result of the police
officers’ neglect, refusal and failure, the petitioners contended that they suffered grave
unspeakable and immeasurable physical and physiological trauma and that the
perpetrators of the aforesaid unlawful acts were able to roam freely and continued to
threaten the physical and psychological well being of the petitioners. The judge held
that the neglect, omission, refusal and/or failure of the police to conduct prompt,
effective, proper and professional investigations into the first eleven petitioners’
complaints of defilement violates the first eleven petitioner’s fundamental rights and
freedoms.
Martial rape refers to any non-consensual sexual acts committed by a spouse. Such an
offence occurs when the victim, who is the spouse, is unable to consent, is forced or
threatened. In Kenya, the Sexual Offences Act does not recognize the offence of
marital rape; in fact, it provides for an exemption under section 43(5). As a result,
women in marriages who suffer from domestic violence and marital rape seem to have
no recourse.27
In the context of SGBV, there are arguments that a husband cannot possibly rape his
wife where the covenant of marriage exists. Within the African setting, women are
viewed as subordinate to men and are not entirely entitled to their own bodies upon
marriage. This gives rise to the misconception that they can be subjected to whatever
act the other spouse deems fit in the performance of their wifely ‘duties.’ This means
that whenever men feel entitled to sex and are denied, then they are allowed to take it
27
International Commission of Jurists(ICJ), ‘Making Rape In Marriage A Crime Can Boost SGBV War’,
December 13, 2023
however and whenever, therefore breeding a ground for abuse and violence, in
marriages28.
Article 29 provides the right not to be subjected to any form of violence from either
public or private sources30 or treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading
manner.31 Article 44(3) states that a person shall not compel another person to
perform, observe or undergo any cultural practice or rite. In addition, Article 53(1) (d)
protects every child from abuse, neglect, harmful cultural practices and all forms of
violence, inhuman treatment and punishment. The Prohibition of Female Genital
Mutilation Act, 2011 stipulates harsh sentences for those who are convicted, including
a prison term of not less than three years or a fine of not less than Ksh 200,000. The
penalty is life imprisonment where a crime of female genital mutilation results in the
death of the victim.32
28
Ibid
29
Second Voluntary National Review on the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (June 2020) p.
51.
30
Article 29(c), Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
31
Article 29(f), Constitution of Kenya, 2010
32
Section 19(2), Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act, 2011
33
Joint General Recommendation 31 of the CEDAW Committee/General Comment 18 of the Committee on the
Rights of the Child on harmful practices (2014)
34
Ibid. para. 31.
to:Ensure that the Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act is widely known and
implemented, and that perpetrators of female genital mutilation, including medical
practitioners, are prosecuted and adequately punished, take measures to eradicate
female genital mutilation, and to update the 2010 female genital mutilation policy35
Section 3 of the Act establishes the Anti-Female Genital Mutilation Board with the
mandate to, inter alia, design, supervise and co-ordinate public awareness
programmes against the practice of female genital mutilation and design programmes
aimed at eradication of female genital mutilation.36
Article 5 of the Maputo Protocol calls on states to prohibit and condemn all forms of
harmful practices which negatively affect the human rights of women and to take all
necessary legislative and other measures to eliminate such practices through
legislative measures backed by sanctions, of all forms of female genital mutilation,
scarification, medicalisation and para-medicalisation of female genital mutilation and
all other practices in order to eradicate them.
A petition was filed in the High Court seeking to legalize female genital mutilation.
One of the grounds advanced for the petition was the right of willing adult women to
participate and enjoy their culture. The court dismissed this argument.
Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act prohibits the practice of female genital
mutilation, so as to safeguard against violation of a person’s mental or physical
integrity through the practice of female genital mutilation and for connected purposes.
A worthy move, Kenya recently adopted the revised National Policy on the
Eradication of Female Genital Mutilation, 2019. 37 The Policy aims, inter alia “to
strengthen multi-sectoral coordination and networking, partnership and community
participation towards eradication of FGM”.
35
Ibid, para. 21
36
Section 5(a)(e), Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act, 2011
37
Kenya, Ministry of Public Service, Youth and Gender, National Policy for the Eradication of Female Genital
Mutilation, 2019, Sessional paper No. 3 of 2019
The Marriage Act, under section 3(2), provides that parties to a marriage have equal
rights and obligations at the time of the marriage, during the marriage and at the
dissolution of the marriage38
43
The State's Constitution has a provision for the Kadhi's courts , which are the
tribunals with Muslim law jurisdiction, including the power to hear divorce matters.
Marriage and Divorce Act directly discriminates in the provisions on marital age,
allowing marriage of women at 16, compared to 18 for men44.
Section 4 of the Act provides for the equal status of spouses where a married woman
has the same rights as a married man48. Section 7 of the Act provides for the
ownership and division of matrimonial property upon divorce or dissolution according
to contribution, which, according to sec 2 of the Act can be : Domestic work,
management of the matrimonial home,childcare, companionship, management of
family business or property and farm work, This provision, according to Justice
Mativo in the case of Federation of Women Lawyers Kenya (FIDA) v Attorney
General & another49, addresses the greatest injustice which was the failure to reward
or recognize a spouse whose contribution to the family was through being a
homemaker, performing household chores, bearing children and raising children or a
spouse who used his or her resources for the day today subsistence requirements of
the family and thereby deprived himself or herself of the opportunity of acquiring
durable property.
45
Peter Mburu Echaria v Priscilla Njeri Echaria [2007] eKLR
46
Mary Rono v Jane Rono & another [2005] eKLR Civil Appeal 66 of 2002
47
Article 45(3) of the constituion of Kenya,2010
48
ibid
49
Federation of Women Lawyers Kenya (FIDA) v Attorney General & another
[2018] KEHC 7130 (KLR)
In the case of UMM v IMM (201450) , the court used the clause in the matrimonial
property act 51 to recognize the wife's non-monetary contributions to family wealth.
In the case of Anne Mumbi Hinga v Peter Gachau Hinga (2017), the first wife,
sought a share of her ex-husband’s estate, arguing she contributed through domestic
work, childcare, and supporting his career even though the properties were registered
under his name52. The court affirmed that non-monetary contributions have equal
value to financial input under the Matrimonial Property Act (2013)
In the case of Agnes Nanjala William vs Jacob Petrus Nicolas Vander Goes 53, where
the Court of Appeal observed that Article 45(3) of the Constitution gives parties to a
marriage equal rights before, during and after a marriage. Article 60(1)(f) provides for
the elimination of gender discrimination in law, customs and practices related to land
and property in land.
In the case of Kivuitu v Kivuitu case (1991) eKLR 248, the court established a
presumption that when property is jointly registered in the names of both spouses,
each spouse owns an equal, undivided share in that property.
Divorce restrictions are binding sites for the subordination of women which
exacerbate gender inequalities and discrimination. 54 A good example is the
Matrimonial Property Act55 which focuses on division of matrimonial property
according to contribution and the burden of proof is often disadvantageous to women
who are unable to prove their non-monetary contributions.
50
U M M v I M M (Civil Suit 39 of 2012)
51
TheMatrimonial Property Act 2013 section 7. section 2 , section 14
52
Anne Mumbi Hinga v Peter Gachau Hinga (2017)eKLR
53
Agnes Nanjala William vs Jacob Petrus Nicolas Vander Goes, Civil Appeal No. 127 of 2011
54
Karin Carmit Yefet, ‘Divorce As A Formal Gender-Equality Right’ Journal Of Constitutional Law (2020) Vol 22:3
55
Matrimonial Property Act, CAP 152 section 7
own families. Women have historically and structurally been disadvantaged in family
inheritance, highlighting the gaps between law and practice and advocating for
transformative reforms that truly honour the spirit of equality enshrined in Kenya's
2010 constitution.
The law of succession act has often failed to adequately protect women’s
inheritance rights as it 56allows for the application of customary law in certain areas,
leading to the exclusion of women especially daughters and widows from inheriting
land and livestock. In the cases of Re Ruenji57 and Re ogolla58, the respective testators
drew wills that did not Carter for their customary wives and the court held that these
wives were not wives for the purposes of succession.
The position of customary wives was codified in Sec 3(5) of the law of succession
Act. According to section 3(5) of succession Act, a woman married to a man under a
system that allows polygamy is a wife for succession purposes under sections 26 and
40 of the Act despite the fact that the Husband may have contracted prior or
subsequent monogamous marriage59. In Peter Kirara Kuria & Another v Hannah
Nyambura Kuria [2004] eKLR, the court boldly refused to uphold Kikuyu customary
law that excluded a married daughter from inheriting her father’s land. The petitioners
relied on the earlier case of Wambugu w/o Gatimu v Stephen Nyaga Kimani , justice
Musinga rejected that precedent, emphasizing that Section 40(1) of the Law of
Succession Act treats sons and daughters equally in polygamous succession. The court
clarified that being a married woman did not strip one of inheritance rights, especially
when she had resettled on her father’s land after widowhood. This progressive
interpretation respected both Section 3 of the Act and Article 27 of the Constitution,
which prohibits gender discrimination.
However, some courts still fail to meet this provision as seen in the case of
WAMBUGU W/O GATIMU VS STEPHEN NYAGA KIMANI (1992) 2 KAR 292
where the Courts of Appeal took the judicial notice of a Kikuyu custom which stated
that a married woman cannot inherit her father’s land and in turn the woman was
56
Section 32 and 33 of the law of suceesion act
57
Re Ruenji’s Estate (1977) EA 21
58
Ogola’s Estate (1978) EA 21
59
The law of sucession Act
denied access to such inheritance on the basis that courts have the power to take
judicial notice of all written and unwritten laws as per Section 60(1)(a) and Section
60(1)(o) of the Evidence Act .
One of the most striking illustrations of the injustice women face under customary
inheritance systems is captured in the words of a woman quoted in the Equal Rights
Trust report In the Spirit of Harambee60: “My brother inherited the land, yet I was
the one who took care of our father in his final days.”
Under Islamic Sharia law (Sunni tradition), the rules of inheritance are strictly
prescribed in the Qur’an, particularly in Surah An-Nisa61. These rules are considered
divine and immutable, meaning no human authority can alter them. Sharia law does
guarantee women a share of inheritance but that share is often unequal compared to
men’s. For instance: A daughter inherits half the share of a son, a wife inherits one-
eighth of her husband’s estate (if they have children), or one-quarter (if there are no
children) , a mother inherits one-sixth, and so on.
The Constitution of Kenya article 27, article 53(2), the Children's Act 2022 and the
Maputo protocol62 champion for equality for both parents in terms of parental
responsibility for a child, whether married or not. Both parents have no claim or right
over the other parent. The Marriage Act, 201463 calls for equality of spouses during
marriage or when divorcing.
Section 32 of the Children's Act, 202264 provides that the mother automatically has the
advantage of parental responsibility. The father can only attain parental responsibility
after he has resided with the mother for at least 12 months, maintained the child,
acknowledged paternity in any form, entered into a parental responsibility agreement
with the mother or by getting a court order. The mother automatically being assigned
60
Equal Rights Trust, In the Spirit of Harambee: Addressing Discrimination and Inequality in Kenya (2012)
61
Quran Chapter 4
62
Article 7( c) of the Maputo protocol,
63
The Marriage Act, 2014
64
Children's Act 2022 section 32
parental custody, establishes a clear picture of gender discrimination, leaving only the
father to seek for legal aid to acquire parental responsibility.
The "tender years doctrine," which presumes that mothers should have custody of
young children unless proven unfit, inherently perpetuates gender discrimination by
favoring women over men in family law. This principle, prioritizes maternal custody
based on traditional gender roles, often sidelining capable fathers and undermining
their parental rights. Critics argue it reinforces stereotypes that mothers are inherently
better caregivers, placing responsible fathers at a disadvantage. While intended to
serve the child’s best interests, its application can overlook paternal contributions. For
instance, in 67HKM v DMA [Civil Appeal 136 of 2011], Kisii High Court prioritized
the child’s welfare and stability over the tender years doctrine, granting custody to the
respondent despite the appellant’s parental rights claim, highlighting the need to
balance child-centric principles with gender-neutral considerations to ensure equitable
custody outcomes.
65
EWG v JMN & another [2017] KEHC 688 (KLR)
66
Cap 176
67
HKM v DMA ( Civil Appeal 136 of 2011)
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
In regards to divorce laws and division of matrimonial property:
Section 10 of the Act should be emended in that any liability by one of the spouses
on the matrimonial property should be valued at the spouse’s’ contribution to the
given liability.
In regard to divorce:
Legal Aid: Ensure the complete execution of the Legal Aid Act 2016 to ensure that
indigent women receive help with their divorce cases
Constitutional Supremacy Must Reign Supreme: All personal and customary laws
must be interpreted in light of the Constitution's Articles 2(4) and 27, which prohibit
any law or practice that discriminates based on gender. Courts should apply the
Constitution boldly, even when confronted with deeply held traditions or religious
norms.
Amendment of The Law of Succession Act : The Law of Succession Act, while
progressive in some areas, still leaves gaps that disadvantage women, particularly in
polygamous settings. Section 3(5)68 recognizes customary wives, but it remains
unclear how estates are divided among children of different unions. Daughters
frequently face discrimination, despite the Act's neutral language. Amendments
should clearly state equal rights for all children, regardless of gender or marital status.
Reforming Sharia law : Reforming Kadhi’s Courts is essential to ensure that their
application of Islamic law aligns with the principles of equality and justice enshrined
in the Constitution. While Sharia law, particularly Sunni interpretation, often
prescribes unequal inheritance shares between men and women, progressive Islamic
thought offers space for reinterpretation through ijtihad (independent reasoning).
Countries like Tunisia and Morocco have already embraced reforms that promote
women's rights without abandoning religious values. Kenya can adopt similar
approaches by encouraging gen der-sensitive training for Kadhis and supporting
reinterpretations that reflect the modern economic and social roles of Muslim women.
This balance would honour both faith and fairness.
68
The Law of Succession Act
69
High Court of Kenya, Tatu Kamau v. Attorney General & 2 others; Equality Now & 9 others (Interested Parties);
Katiba Institute & another (Amicus Curiae) [2021] eKLR, Constitutional Petition No. 244 of 2019.
Amend section 24 of the Act, which provides for the offence of failure to report an act
of female genital mutilation. The section is likely to affect victims of female genital
mutilation for failure to report the offence.
Amend the Act to charge doctors and health workers as well as penalize institutions
that accommodate female genital mutilation on the premises.
The State should ensure that the Anti-Female Genital Mutilation Board is properly
resourced to effectively carry out its mandate.
The State should also intensify public education and awareness campaigns, especially
in areas where female genital mutilation is prevalent, to encourage change of attitude.
Develop a clear guide on alternative rites of passage.
Judges, magistrates, lawyers and other professionals revolving around family law
should all undergo deep and sensitive training on gender equality, the impact of
unconscious bias and how gender dynamics affect parenting. Insights from social
sciences, literature and also the public should be incorporated to the training to
cultivate more understanding of gender discrimination and how to fully attain gender
equality.
Alienating discriminatory family laws out of customary laws can be a starting point.
Where conflicts arise, the principles of child welfare and equality as provided for in
the Constitution should prevail. Co-parenting and Mediation processes can solve these
family cases efficiently and effectively, given that the ADRs mechanism ensures that
the interests of the child are put first. Co-parenting is easier as parents can decide
which system works for them as long as it does not affect any aspect of the child’s life
negatively.
Fostering stronger and better collaboration between the arms of government, judiciary
and legislature in particular and civil society organizations working on gender
equality and rights of children to create and apply thorough strategies to fight gender
discrimination in the country. International Conventions and Treaties for example
UNHRC and the Maputo Protocol are a guidance to fostering gender equality in
Kenya.
5.0 CONCLUSION
In sum, no person: Woman or man should be left behind just because tradition,
custom, or systemic bias says so. It is wrong that women face discrimination in family
matters like marriage, inheritance, property, or custody. Laws exist to fix this, but they
need stronger action and more awareness to truly work. Kenya can create a fairer
society by pushing for change and ensuring every woman’s rights are respected in
family life.