Atish Mathur Polity 2025
Atish Mathur Polity 2025
Subject Polity
Jurisprudence, Legal
History, Territory,
L1: MCP 2025 16 Feb 2025 : 1 p.m. Portal
Citizenship, Preamble, FR,
DPSP, FD.
Jurisprudence, Legal
Current Affairs relating History, Territory,
16 Feb 2025 : 7 p.m. Youtube(Free)
to L1: MCP 2025 Citizenship, Preamble, FR,
DPSP, FD.
Bodies (Constitutional,
Statutory, Executive),
L5: MCP 2025 16 Mar 2025 : 1 p.m. Portal
Regulatory, Quasi Judicial,
Sectoral etc.
Bodies (Constitutional,
Current Affairs relating Statutory, Executive),
16 Mar 2025 : 7 p.m. Youtube(Free)
to L5: MCP 2025 Regulatory, Quasi Judicial,
Sectoral etc.
Lec 1 Jurisprudence, Legal History, Territory, Citizenship, Preamble, FR, DPSP, FD.
Rule of Law, Constitutionalism, British Acts & Aspirational Docs, Types of Majorities, Dimensions
of Territory and Core Provisions, States Reorganisation, Citizenship & Related Terms, Principles &
Provisions, Comparisons & Classifications : Preamble, FR, DPSP, FD Preamble : Key Word
Meaning, Status, Rights : Meaning of State & Supremacy, Equality; Non Discrimination, Affirmative
Lec 1 Action, Reservation, Untouchability, Titles, Freedoms; Dissent, Censorship, Exceptions [Link] &
Topics Liberty; Dignified Life, Privacy, Environment, Gender, other applications, Due Process, Natural
Justice, Relationship between Equality, Freedoms, and Liberty, Criminal Justice and Protection
Rights, Anti Exploitation & Child Labour Rights, Secularism, Freedom of Religion, Minority
Rights Property Rights, Law of Writs, Amenability of FRs : Doctrine of Basic Structure,
Relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
Lec 4 Federalism, C/S Relations, Scheduled Areas, Emergency, Local Self Govt.
Legislative Relations & Emergency Provisions, Administrative Relations Financial Relations, Fiscal
Lec 4 Federalism, Inter State Water Disputes Special Cases : Delhi, Scheduled Areas, Special Status &
Topics Category States, Art 370, Art 371, PRI : Structure, ULBs : Structure, PESA, V Schedule, VI
Schedule : Features
Lec 5 Bodies
Meaning :
A legal doctrine wherein decisions taken by the State are based on established and just laws. It
restricts the powers of the State by compelling it to conform to the laws of the land.
International Report :
India ranks 79th out of 142 in the Rule of Law Index 2024 prepared by World Justice Project
Pillars :
Absence of Arbitrary Power
An action taken by the State by the application of their own mind and not the application of
law.
Equality Before Law
Everyone is equally accountable for violating the law and no special treatment for anyone
irrespective of any criteria
Predominance of Legal Spirit
Courts have the power to review an action objectionable to law
Application of Rule of Law in India :
Rule of Law is NOT explicitly mentioned in the Constitution of India but is reflected in many of
our Constitutional Provisions and/or Constitutional principles relating to
Written/Singularly Codified Constitution
Fundamental Rights
Procedure Established by Law and Due Process of Law
Principles of Natural Justice
Democracy and Universal Adult Suffrage
Judicial Independence
Judicial Review
Separation of Powers
Federalism
The Constitution of India places the duty to uphold Rule of Law primarily with the Judiciary.
Essentially a doctrine, the SC has repeatedly recognised Rule of Law as a part of the Basic Structure
contact@[Link] | [Link]
[Link] | contact@[Link] | [Link]
PCN 1 : MCP 2025 : Atish Mathur
Meaning A legal concept that seeks Means through which An exhaustive legislation
to limit the powers of the structure and limitations of that singularly seeks to
Govt. the Govt are sought. provide structure and
limitations of the Govt.
1. Constitutionalism :
a. A concept of political science and legal philosophy
which states that it is necessary to limit the powers
Democracy
of the Govt.
b. The doctrine of Rule of Law is the basis of
Constitutionalism.
c. Democracy is non negotiable for both Rule of Law
and Constitutionalism.
d. A Constitutional Govt. is a govt whose powers are
limited. This can be done by Constitutional Laws Rule of Law Constitutionalism
including a Constitution.
e. Governments with unlimited powers can never be
democratic Govts. Therefore, Constitutional
Governments are always democratic Governments.
[Link] Law :
Branch of law dealing with sources of law that determine the structures and/or
limitations of government. Sources include :
Legislation : Constitution (1950), Pres & VP Elections Act, 1952 etc.
Judicial Precedent : Kesavananda Bharti(1973) , Minerva Mills(1980)
Customs/Conventions : senior most SC judge to become CJI
[Link]
Part of Original
Yes Yes Yes No (via 42nd CA, 1976)
Constitutional Text
Source of Inspiration Objectives Resolution US Constitution Bill of Rights Irish Constitution USSR
Socio Economic
Interpretation Aid, Key to
Democracy,
Purpose minds of Constitution Political & Civil Democracy Citizen Expectations
fundamental for
Makers
governance
Independent Source
of Legis. & Exec. No Yes Yes Yes
Power
Independent
Limitation on Legis. & No Yes No No
Exec Power
Source of Judicial
No Yes No No
Power
Enforceable by
Legislation, Executive Enforceable by Legislation,
Enforceable by Legislation,
Action, NOT Executive Action, NOT
Legal Status No independent legal status Executive Action, Enforceable IN
Enforceable IN a court Enforceable IN a court of
a court of Law (higher judiciary)
of Law (higher Law (higher judiciary)
judiciary)
Amenability (subject
CA u/a Art 368 Spl.
to Basic Structure CA u/a Art 368 Spl. Maj. II CA u/a Art 368 Spl. Maj. II CA u/a Art 368 Spl. Maj. II
Maj. II
Doctrine)
Classification of Rights
Placement Part III of the Constitution Constitution but not in Part III Any other law
Classification of FR
Coverage Citizen Rights - would be explicitly mentioned for each right Art 29 : Cultural and Educational Rights
Mandatory Non Self Executory : Rights which necessarily need Art 23: Prohibition of traffic in human beings and
to be furthered by an additional law or measure. forced labour
Classification of DPSP
Fundamental Rights :
UDHR (1948) & Preamble, FR, 1. 86th CA 2002
Yes
DPSP, FD a. Art 21A : Right to Education
2. 97th CA 2011 :
FR & FD No a. Art 19(1)(c) : Added cooperative societies to the freedom to
form association and unions
3. 103 CA 2019 :
FR & DPSP No a. Art 15(6) and Art 16(6) : 10% EWS Quota in Education and
Public Employment
DPSP and FD No
Directive Principles of State Policy
1. 42 CA 1976
FR & LR (Legal Rights) No
a. Art 39(f): Secure opportunities for healthy development of
children
FD & LD (Legal Duties) No b. Art 39A: Equal justice and free legal aid
c. Art 43A : Participation of workers in management of
industries
d. Art 48A : Protection and improvement of environment and
International HR Doc Status safeguarding of forests and wild life
2. 44 CA 1978
International HR Document India’s Status a. Art 38 : State to secure a social order for the promotion of
welfare of the people
UHDR (not legally binding) Supported 3. 86 CA 2002
a. Art 45 : Early childhood care and education to children
below the age of six years
ICCPR, ICESCR, CEDAW(Women), 4. 97 CA 2011
CRC(Child), CRPD(Disabilities),
a. Promotion of co-operative societies
ICERD(Racial Discrimination), ILO Ratified
Conventions (Forced & Child
Labour) Fundamental Duties
1. 42 CA 1976
a. Art 51A : Fundamental Duties were added
CAT(Torture) Signatory
2. 86 CA 2002
a. parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education
to his child between the 6 - 14 years
Criteria Issue
Special Phrasing ‘key to Constitution makers’ minds’; ‘Identity Card’; ‘Political horoscope’
Amendment Procedure Under Art 368 without State Ratification (Special Majority II)
Extent of Amendment Changes can be made without altering the meaning of objectives
Phrase Meaning
Phrase Meaning
Addressing root causes of inequality
Justice
(Social, Economic, Political)
External and Internal Non
Soveriegn Interference
Independent Nation Max development of oneself
Liberty No/Limited external constraints
(thought, expression, faith, belief, worship)
Socialist State Intervention for Welfare
Reflections of Equality
Absence of Arbitrariness
Legal Spirit
Equality
Violation of
Provisions Overview
1. Components
a. Equality Before Law & Courts of Law
b. Equal Protection of Law
2. Exemptions
a. Art 31C : Laws implementing Art 39(c) and (d)
b. Art 105/194 : MP/MLA Immunities/Privileges
c. Art 359(1) : Emergency Proclamation
d. Art 361 : President & Governor Immunities
Art 14 All State Self Executory
i. Professional Actions : Absolute Civil and
Criminal
ii. Personal Actions : Criminal till holding
office, and 2 months notice prior starting
civil proceedings
e. Art 361A : Immunity while publishing true
reports of Parliamentary Proceedings
f. Diplomatic Immunity
Art 16(1) Citzens State Self Executory Equal opportunity in State employment
All
Non Self
Art 15(3) women & State State can make special provisions for women & children
Executory
children
1. State can make special provisions for SC, ST, SEBC (SEBC
Non Self
Art 15(4) Citizens State and OBC are interchangeably used)
Executory
a. Added via 1st CA, 1951
Non Self State can make special provisions for Backward Classes (now
Art 16(4) Citizens State
Executory read as OBCs)
Art Non Self 1. Carry forward policy for all reserved sections except EWS
- State
16(4B) Executory a. Added via 81st CA, 2000
The President, by
The President, by
public The President, by public Government Policy;
public notification as
Specified By notification as notification as per Art. Effectuated via
per Art. 342 of the
per Art. 341 of 342A of the Constitution. Government notification.
Constitution.
the Constitution.
No formal sub
No formal sub
classification at No formal sub classification
classification at national No formal sub
Sub Classification national level; at national level; Applicable
level; states can sub- classification
states can sub- in some states.
classify
classify
Group - Enabling
Method Quantum Special Remarks
> Criteria Provisions
School Art. 15(5) Art. 15(6) Sec. 12, RTE Act, 2009; Basis - EWS - Public &
Min 25%
Education Art. 21-A. Private Schools
SC ST OBC Cap at
50%
Art. 16 (4), (4A), (4B),(6)
15% for SC Promotion
Art. 335 (admin
Public Guidelines, Orders and 7.5% for ST Reservation with
efficiency must not be
Employment Notifications etc. 27% for OBC Seniority only for SC
compromised while
10% for EWS ST
giving reservation)
Carry Forward for SC
ST OBC not for EWS
General Provisions
Art 46: Directs the State to promote the educational and economic interests of SCs, STs, and other weaker sections and
protect them from social injustice and exploitation.
Art 340: Empowers the President to appoint a commission to investigate the conditions of backward classes and
recommend measures for their welfare. (Hence, NCSC, NCST, NCBC)
SC on Education Reservation
State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951)
Declared castebased reservations in educational institutions unconstitutional under Art 29(2),
leading to the First Constitutional Amendment (1951), which inserted Art 15(4).
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)
Upheld 27% OBC reservation in employment and introduced the concept of the "creamy
layer" for OBCs but ruled that reservations do not apply to promotions. This principle was
later extended to educational institutions.
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002)
Held that private unaided institutions have the right to admit students but cannot be forced
to implement state reservations.
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra (2005)
Ruled that reservations cannot be imposed on private unaided institutions, leading to the
93rd Constitutional Amendment, inserting Art 15(5).
Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2022)
Upheld the 103rd Constitutional Amendment, validating the 10% EWS reservation.
SC on Employment Reservation
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992):
Upheld OBC reservations under Art 16(4) but excluded reservations in promotions.
Capped total reservations at 50%, barring exceptional circumstances.
Introduced the concept of the "creamy layer" to exclude economically advanced sections
within OBCs from reservation benefits.
M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (2006):
Upheld constitutional amendments allowing reservation in promotions (Arts 16(4A) and
16(4B)).
Mandated states to provide quantifiable data on backwardness, inadequate representation,
and administrative efficiency before implementing such reservations.
Rajeev Kumar Gupta v. Union of India (2016):
Allowed reservation in promotions for persons with disabilities under the Persons with
Disabilities Act, 1995, stating it does not violate Art 16.
Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018):
Removed the requirement to prove "backwardness" for SCs/STs while implementing
promotion reservations.
Reaffirmed that states must collect quantifiable data on inadequate representation and
ensure administrative efficiency.
Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2022):
Upheld the constitutionality of the 103rd Amendment, which introduced EWS reservations.
State of Punjab v Davinder Singh (2024)
Upheld the constitutional validity of subclassification in the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled
Tribe categories.
SC Interpretations
1. Sovereignty & Integrity# Dissent
Peaceful Assembly 2. Public Order Does not include right to strike
without Arms [under Art 19(3)] Includes the right to peaceful protest
19(1)(b) (#Added via 16 CA, 1963) Sedition only when speech incites
violence (BNS does not include
explicitly include Sedition anymore)
SC Interpretations
Move freely [19(1)(d)], 1. General Public Interest Inter and intra state movements included
reside, settle in India’s 2. ST Interest but subject to restrictions
Territory [19(1)(e)] [under Art 19(5)] Arrests, Imprisonments, Preventive
Detention, Containment etc permissable
1. Legal Recognition of Electronic Records: Recognises electronic records and signatures as legally valid.
2. Electronic Governance:
Enables e-filing and digital transactions, recognition of contracts formed through electronic means.
3. Compensation for :unauthorised access or damage to computer systems and failure to protect sensitive personal data.
4. Cybercrimes and Offences:
Section 65: Tampering with computer source documents.
Section 66: Identity theft, impersonation, and fraud.
Section 66F: Cyber terrorism.
Section 67: Publishing obscene content electronically.
Section 69: Government’s power to intercept, monitor, and decrypt information.
Section 69A: Power to block public access to information.
5. Intermediary Liability:
Section 79: Provides conditional immunity to intermediaries from liability for user-generated content.
6. Cybersecurity:
Section 70B: Establishes the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) for cybersecurity incident
response.
7. Jurisdiction:
Section 75: IT Act applies to offences committed outside India if they impact an Indian system.
8. Miscellaneous:
Section 81: The IT Act overrides other laws in case of conflicts.
Section 85: Companies are liable for cybercrimes committed by employees.
Key Provisions of the IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021:
1. Due Diligence by Intermediaries:
Publish user policies prohibiting illegal content (e.g., child abuse, hate speech, misinformation).
Remove unlawful content within 36 hours of a government or court order.
Retain user data for 180 days after account closure.
Report cybersecurity incidents to CERT-In.
2. Grievance Redressal Mechanism:
A three-tier structure for grievance redressal: self-regulation by publishers, self-regulation by self-regulating bodies, and
an oversight mechanism by the Central Government.
Grievance Officer: Appointed by intermediaries to handle complaints within 24 hours and resolve them within 15 days.
Grievance Appellate Committee (GAC): Established by the government to review complaints that remain unresolved.
3. Significant Social Media Intermediary (SSMI) Compliance:
Platforms with a large user base (threshold set by the government) must:
Appoint Chief Compliance Officer, Nodal Contact Person, and Resident Grievance Officer.
Publish monthly compliance reports.
Enabling identification of the first originator of information on its platform
Deploying technology-based measures to proactively identify and remove information depicting child sexual abuse
or rape.
Providing users with a mechanism to voluntarily verify their accounts.
4. Content Moderation & Fact-Checking:
Online curated content must be classified into categories (U, U/A 7+, U/A 13+, U/A 16+, A) based on themes, violence,
nudity, sex, language, drug use, and horror.
Prohibition of Misinformation: False content about government business can be flagged by fact-check units.
Platforms must ensure age-gated content for minors.
Publishers of news and current affairs content and online curated content must adhere to a Code of Ethics. The
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting oversees adherence to the Code of Ethics, develops an Oversight Mechanism,
and can issue guidance and advisories to publishers.
5. Digital News and OTT Regulations:
Online publishers must adhere to a three-tier grievance mechanism for digital content.
OTT platforms must self-classify content based on age appropriateness.
6. Online Gaming Regulations (2023 Amendments) :
Online games involving real money must be verified by self-regulatory bodies.
Ban on betting and harmful online games.
Gaming platforms must conduct user KYC verification.
*86th CA, 2002 is the only CA that amends FR, DPSP, FD simultaneously. Added Art 21 A, changed Art 45 (DPSP : from 6-14
to 0-6 years), added Art 51A(k) (FD)
NFSA, 2013
School Edu NCPCR
(Concurrent List) RTE Act, 2009
Right to Education Art 21A PM Poshan
SCPCR
RTE Rules
1. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act)
Every child (6-14) has the right to free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school.
Requires private unaided schools to reserve 25% of seats for children from economically weaker
sections (EWS) and disadvantaged groups.
Schools cannot demand any donation or fee for admission.
No child can be denied admission for lack of documents.
No child shall be subjected to physical or mental harassment.
National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) is authorized to prescribe minimum qualifications
for teachers in elementary education (Classes I-VIII)
Passing the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) is mandatory for appointment as a teacher in both
government and private schools
TET is conducted by the appropriate government (Central or State) following NCTE guidelines
A defined teacher student ratio is to be maintained to ensure quality education.
National and State Commissions for Protection of Child Rights monitor the implementation.
School Management Committees to be setup to ensure participatory governance in schools
Schools must fulfil set criteria to be eligible to be a RTE School.
States are required to frame their own rules under the RTE Act while adhering to its core principles
2. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Amendment) Rules, 2024 (RTE Rules)
Mandatory exams for Class 5 and 8.
Students failing to meet the criteria will receive additional instruction and re-examination
within two months. If they fail again, they may be held back in Class 5 or 8.
Schools cannot expel any student before completing elementary education.
Stakeholders
All offences are crimes, but not all crimes are offences under Indian law.
Offences are violations of the law that are defined and punishable under specific laws, while crimes are broader wrongful
acts that may or may not be defined and punishable under Indian law. Eg. Marital Rape is a crime but not an offence.
Types of Offences
Bail as a right, Discretionary Arrest w/o Arrest only upon Affect individuals Affect individuals
less serious Bail, warrant warrant Can be settled & society
offences, More serious Investigation No investigation mutually between Can’t be settled
can be granted offences, can begin w/o court parties
by courts and Can only be without Court permission Sometimes,
police granted by permission No direct FIR, court’s
(bail as such courts FIR must be complaint permission is
not defined) registered forwarded to required to settle.
immediately Court/Magistrate
Journey of a Crime
Reporting Investigation Trial
Can be reported to Closure Report/ Acquitted (Not guilty)
Witness, Evidence,
Police Charge Sheet Convicted (Guilty)/Sentencing
Forensics are examined.
Magistrate Death (rarest of the rare)
Jail (life - 14, tenure) {lifetime in some cases)
Fine
Summons (Arrest, Search, Seizure) can be issued by Court/Magistrate only
FIR not defined anywhere Accused Arrested (Warrant or w/o warrant)
Arrest: To take a person into legal custody.
It is done by Police officers, to prevent Produced before Magistrate within 24 hours
escape and begin Investigation. Custody requested if further needed
Custody: The Act of detention of a person Police Custody : Shorter, direct police investigation
by legal authorities. Arrest is just the initial
Judicial Custody : Longer, police need court permission to interrogate
action that leads to custody.
Remand: Sending an accused person to Plea Bargaining
judicial custody (jail) or police custody after Introduced in 2005, defendant/accused agrees to plead guilty in exchange for
arrest while awaiting trial or further concessions from the prosecutor or court.
investigation. It is ordered by a magistrate.
I.e., remand leads to Custody. Does not apply to offences leading to 7+ years of imprisonment, women &
children, adversing socio economic conditions of society
Sentencing can be reversed, lightened, reduced by President/Governor subject to Constitutional division of Union & State Legislative Powers.
Jail Time can also be shortened/adjusted subject to laws - Parole - discretionary, Furlough - temporary due to an emergency
Constitutional Protections
Provision Remarks
Double Jeopardy
autrefois convict : if convicted for an offence, cannot be prosecuted and/or punished again for
the same offence.
Art 20(2)
does not apply to administrative enquiries
autrefois acquit (does not apply in India) : even if acquitted for an offence, cannot be tried again
for the same offence
Self Incrimination
Art 20(3) person has to officially ‘accused’ of an offence
can’t be forced to be a witness or give evidence against themselves
Arrest
available for all
right to legal counsel
right to be informed
to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours (travel time and holidays not counted)
Preventive Detention (Union & Concurrent List)
not available for enemy aliens
right to be informed
no right to legal counsel, but can challenge detention order
Preventive Detention laws cannot allow for than 3 months of detention
In case more, advisory board comprising of HC Judges or equivalent must approve
Art 22 Major Laws : UAPA, PMLA ‘02, National Security Act ‘80, AFSPA ‘58, Official Secrets Act 1923
UAPA, 1967 (4 major amendments : ‘04, 08, ‘12, ‘19)
Extends to the entire country and also applies to Indian citizens outside India.
Establishes a Tribunal to adjudicate if an association should be banned.
Defines terrorist acts, including acts causing harm to India's unity, integrity, security, or
economic security.
Allows seizure of proceeds of terrorism, including funds and assets used for terrorist
purposes.
Individuals can also be declared as terrorists not just organisations.
Provides death penalty or life imprisonment for terrorist acts.
Denies bail if prima facie evidence exists against the accused.
Allows electronic evidence & intercepted communications as admissible evidence.
Adds terrorism & organised crime as offences Mandates forensic investigation for offences punishable with
Includes crimes such as kidnapping, extortion and cyber- seven years of imprisonment or more.
crime committed on behalf of a crime syndicate. Petty All trials, inquiries, and proceedings may be held in electronic
organised crime is also an offence now mode. Production of electronic communication devices, likely
Murder by a group of five or more persons on grounds of to contain digital evidence, will be allowed for investigation,
certain identity markers such as caste, language or personal inquiry, or trial.
belief will be an offence with penalty life imprisonment or If a proclaimed offender has absconded to evade trial and
death, and with a fine there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, the trial can
be conducted and judgement pronounced in his absence.
Against State & Private : People’s Union for Democratic Rights vs. Union of India (1982)
Human Trafficking : Exploitation of any kind, consent is immaterial
Begar : Forced work without pay
Forced Labour : Forced with less than minimum wage pay or no pay
Bonded Labour : Forced work due to inability to pay debt
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1984)
Art 23(1) Trafficking defined under BNS, 2023;
Included as an Organised Crime under BNS, 2023.
Covers slavery as well as sexual exploitation.
International Instruments (India has ratified both)
UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime, 2000
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and
Children (Palermo Protocol)
Allows for State to impose compulsory service without discriminating on religion, race, caste, or
Art 23(2)
class or a combination of them.
District Magistrate,
Rescue Trafficking Police Child Welfare
State govt may allow Preferably women
Investigation Officers, Special Police Officers,
Executive Magistrate officers, Special Courts
Trial Courts Special Courts
to hear cases
Child Welfare
Vigilance committees
Committee decides
Protective Homes, focus on providing
Relief and whether to send
intermediate safe economic N.A.
Rehabilitation the child to parents
custody of victims. rehabilitation, and
or a rehabilitation
credit to freed labour
home.
Laws governing Provident Fund, Child Labour, Manual Scavenging, Bonded Labour not subsumed under any Labour Code
POSH Act, 2013 (Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act)
Organisations with 10 or more employees must constitute an ICC to address sexual harassment complaints.
The ICC should have a woman presiding officer, at least two employee members, and one external member with expertise
in sexual harassment issues
Local Committee set up at the District Level
Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997) [Victim was Bhanwari Devi, Vishakha was the name of the NGO]
Sexual harassment as a violation of Art 21
Court defined sexual harassment and issued guidelines as Judicial Legislation in force until 2013 legislation.
Secularism (Added via 42nd CA, India is secular but not an anti-religious State - Seervai
Preamble
1976) Based on principles of Equality, Liberty, and Neutrality
Art 16(5) Law can be made ensuring members of bodies governing religious institutions are of the same religion
Source Provisions
Section of citizens residing in any part of the territory of India, having distinct script, language or
Art 29(1) culture have a right to conserve the same
No subjected to reasonable restrictions embodied in Article 19(6)
Safeguards to all citizens including minorities against discrimination in the matter of admission to State
Art 29(2) maintained or State aided educational institutions on the grounds only of religion, race, caste,
language or any of them
Religion based and Linguistic minorities shall have the right to establish and administer educational
Art 30(1)
institutions of their choice.
Art 30(2) State can’t discriminate against minority educational institutions while giving grants
Added via 7th CA, 1956 (Enabling State Reorganisation Act, 1956)
Art 350A States to provide for mother tongue medium edu. in primary edu for linguistic minorities within the
states, President can also issue such directions if necessary
Added via 7th CA, 1956 (Enabling State Reorganisation Act, 1956)
Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities
Art 350B
Apptd. by President, reports to be laid before Union & State Legislatures and sent to both Govts.
No qualifications, tenure, removal process mentioned.
Minorities
1. Muslims,
2. Sikhs, Language of the minority
3. Christians, group need not be one of
4. Buddhists, the 22 languages of VIII
5. Jain Schedule
6. Zorastrians (Parsis)
State level
mother tongues are
different from the
principal language of
the State
District/Taluka/Tehsil level
different from the principal
language of the district or
Minority Institutions taluka/tehsil
A.P. Christians Medical Educational Society Case ((1986) Aligarh Muslim University Through its Registrar
Dayanand Anglo Vedic (DAV) College Case 2013) Faizan Mustafa v Naresh Agarwal (2024)
Conditions - 3 fold test :
1. Established by minority in that state 1. genesis of the institution
2. Administered by minority in that state 2. purpose of establishing the institution
3. Primarily for benefit of minorities of that state 3. steps taken to implement the establishment,
such as who provided the funds, land, etc.
State Intervention in Minority Edu. Institutions
Since Education is in Concurrent List, and regulation of Reservation & Minority Institutions
Higher Education is in Union List, state can prescribe
minimum standards of education religious minority edu. SC/ST/OBC/EWS Reservation not applicable to
Institutions to give recognition/equivalence Minority Edu. Institutions [Art 15(5), 15(6)]
(eg. UP Madrassa Act, 2004)
rt 15(5)
ded A
CA’ 05 ad
93rd
TMA Pai Case (2002)
Pramati Education Trust v. UoI
No aid or affiliation Only affiliation no aid Both affiliation & aid (2014) : RTE Reservation under
RTE Act 2009 does not apply to
No state intervention Academic and Academic and Affiliation Minority Edu. Insti
Affiliation provisions can be enforced
provisions can be and
enforced admit a “sprinkling of
outsiders” to comply with
Art 29(2)
Linguistic Survey is conducted by Language Division, Office of Registrar General & Census Commissioner, MHA
Census 2011 : 121 Languages : 22 Scheduled, 99 Non Scheduled, 270 mother tongues grouped under Sch/Non Sch.
‘mother tongue’ is the language spoken in childhood by the person’s mother to the person, the language mainly spoken at home
Types of Languages
Scheduled Non Scheduled Classical
22 languages as per VIII Sch. 99 incl. English Recognised by the Union Govt for
Also mentioned in Census Only mentioned in Census promotion
Languages listed here are official promoted No official mandate to promote, Criteria - Old texts, heritage value,
by Govt. hence, demand to inclusion in knowledge texts in poetry and prose.
Originally, 14 languages VIIIth Sch Tamil (‘04), Sanskrit (’04), Telugu (‘08),
21 CA 1967 - Sindhi added Kannada (’08), Malayalam (‘13), Odia
71 CA, 1992 - Konkani, Manipuri, Nepali (’14)
92 CA, 2004 - Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Santali 2024 Additions : Marathi, Bengali,
Assamese, Pali & Prakrit
Union/Official Hindi and English Art 343 & Official Languages Act, 1963
English (As per CoI) & Hindi (OLA, ‘63) Art 120, Art 348(1) & Official Languages
Parliament/Bills/Acts
Mother tongue after Chair permission Act, 1963
Hindi/English/State's official language Art 210, Art 348(1), Art 348(3), OLA, 1963
States/Bills/Acts
Eng. Translation : Other lang/Pres Lang. Various State Official Language Acts
Centre State Comm. Hindi/English; State may use regional lang. Article 346, 347
Promotional Directive Union’s duty to promote and develop Hindi Art 351
Who are FRs for? Citizens/Non Citizens/Entities/As per FR/ SC Cases/Locus Standi can be relaxed in for some Writs/PILs
Doctrine of Severability : The courts can choose to declare specifically those sections, provisions, parts of a ‘law’ that violate
FRs as invalid, and leave the rest of the law as valid. (Detailed test laid down under R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla case, 1957)
Doctrine of Waiver of FRs : FRs cannot be waived by persons. [Several SC Cases such as Yusuf Ali and Omega Adv Agency)
Type of
Jurisdiction Remedy Remarks
Violation?
Types of Writs
Locus
Type of Writ Purpose Available Against Terms & Conditions
Standi*
Wrongful
Not available to question
occupation of
Quo Warranto Executive Relaxed suitability, only eligibility
appointed public
violations are entertained
office
Provision Summary
Parliament through law can restrict the availability of FR to armed forces, public order related, intelligence
Art 33 personnel.
eg Army, Navy, Airforce Acts restrict Art 19(1)(c) for their personnel
Actions (incl. FR violations) done during a time when martial law is imposed can be excused by
Parliamentary Law if actions were in interest of public order where martial law was imposed.
Art 34
No provision in CoI defining martial law or laying down the process of enforcing it.
Doesn’t forbid martial law either, Pres. as Armed Forces Supreme Commander can authorise [Art 53(2)]
Important Doctrines
Basic Meaning
Doctrine
(Detailed Explanations covered under Specific PCNs covering the related topic)
A waiver is when someone voluntarily gives up a right or claim. However, this does
Doctrine of Waiver
not apply to fundamental rights, which cannot be waived
Allows courts to separate valid parts of a law from invalid parts. If one part of a law
Doctrine of Severability
is unconstitutional, the rest of the law can still be enforced
Doctrine of Colourable Prevents legislatures from indirectly doing something they are not allowed to do
Legislation directly. It ensures that laws are not passed under false pretenses
Doctrine of Pith and Helps determine if a law falls within a legislature's authority. It examines the true
Substance nature and essence of the law to decide its validity
Doctrine of Proportionality Ensures that any restriction on rights is proportionate to the goal being achieved. It
requires a rational connection between the means and the objective
Doctrine of Legitimate Public authorities must act fairly and consistently. If they make promises or
Expectation establish practices, they should not change them arbitrarily without notice
Doctrine of Harmonious
Used to interpret laws in a way that resolves conflicts between different provisions.
Construction
It aims to make all parts of a law work together cohesively
Constitutional
Welfarist/
Amendments
Socialist/ Extent to which
Limiting Doctrine of
Land Reforms/ Constitution can
Challenges to Land Basic Structure
Nationalisation be amended
Reforms & Nationalisation
Policies
Policies
Provision Description
Art 13(4) CA are not ‘law’ as per Art 13(4); Added via 24th CA, 1971
Art 19(1)(f) Freedom to acquire, hold and dispose of property (removed via 44 CA, 1978)
Art 31(1) No person shall be deprived of his property except by law (removed via 44 CA, 1978)
The State can only acquire property for public purposes and would have to compensate (removed via 44
Art 31(2)
CA, 1978)
Art 31A State acquisition of property not violative of FRs. (added via 1st CA, 1951)
Art 31B Inserted IXth Schedule, Laws under IXth Schedule judicially non reviewable (added via 1st CA, 1951)
Art 31C Laws made to implement Art 39(b) and 39(c) don’t violate Art 14, 19 (added via 25th CA, 1971)
State to make policies towards ensuring equitable distribution of ownership and control of material
Art 39(b)
resources of the community (used for land reforms, bank nationalisation, abolition of privy purses)
State to make policies towards preventing concentration of wealth and means of production (used for
Art 39(c)
land reforms, bank nationalisation, abolition of privy purses)
Art 300A No person shall be deprived of his property except by Law (added via 44th CA, 1978)
Art 368 Power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution and the procedure for it.
Art 15(4) : State can make provisions for SEBC, SC, ST advancement (Champakam nullified)
Art 19(2) : Restrictions relating public order, friendly relations with foreign states and incitement to
an offence added (to counter Romesh Thapar (1951) Art 19 related judgement)
1st CA, 1951
Art 19(6)(ii) : State can fully/partially monopolise any trade, business, industry or service
PM : Nehru Art 31A : Property acquisition by State would not violate Art 14, 19,31
Art 31B : Inserted IXth Schedule, any law inserted in the IXth Sch. could not challenged on grounds
of violation of FRs.
CA are not ‘law’ as per Art 13(2)
2 types of law making powers
Shankari Prasad v. Union of India (1951) :
Constituent : To amend CoI under Art 368
Parl has unlimited constituent power to amend anything in CoI
Ordinary : As per Sch VII (Included in ‘law’ as per Art 13(2)
Sajjan Singh v. State of RJ (1965) : Reaffirmed CA not law under Art 13(2) (Contention was that 17th CA reduced HC
powers by disallowing judicial review, and should have been passed using state ratification majority)
FRs have a ‘transcendental’ position in CoI
CA are ‘law’ as per Art 13(2) (overruled Shankari and Sajjan Singh)
Golak Nath v. State of PB (1967) :
Parl cannot amend anything in Part III from now on (Doctrine of prospective
overruling - judgement only applicable for future cases)
Art 13(4) : Art 13 wont apply to CA under Art 368 implying CA are not ‘law’ as per Art 13(2)
(negatived Golak Nath)
Art 368 : Title : from 'Procedure' to 'Power to amend CoI and procedure thereof.’
24th CA, 1971 : Art 368(1): Parl. has constituent power to amend any provision in CoI (negatived Golak Nath)
Art 368(2): Pres. can only give assent to CA Bills, can’t reject/return.
Art 368(3): Art 13 wont apply to CA under Art 368 implying CA are not ‘law’ as per Art 13(2)
(negatived Golak Nath)
RC Cooper v. UoI (1970) : Struck down Bank Nationalisation on grounds of inadequate
compensation and violation of property rights under Art 31 Govt had nationalised
private banks and abolished
25th CA, 1971 : Art 31 : inadequate compensation can’t be challenged in court
privy purses in pursuit of
Art 31C : 39(b)(c) > Art 14,19,31
DPSPs under Art 39(b) and
Laws enacted to implement Art 39(b)(c) can’t be challenged
Art 39(c)
Scindia v. UoI (1971) : Abolition of Privy Purses (assured under Art 291, 362)
26th CA, 1971 : Removed Art 291 and 362, inserted Art 363 A abolishing Privy Purses PM : I. Gandhi from 66-77
29th CA, 1971 : Kerala land reform Acts were added to the IXth Sch
Kesavananda Bharti v. KL (1973) CA not ‘Law’ under Art 13 (Upheld 24th CA, overruled Golak Nath)
Parliament can amend anything subject to Basic Structure (Principles laid
(24th, 25th, 29th CA Challenged)
down by SC from time to time)
Art 31C : 39(b)(c) > Art 14,19,31 BUT judicially reviewable (partially upheld 25th CA)
39th CA, 1975 : Pres, VP, PM, Lok Sabha Speaker elections not judicially reviewable
39th CA, 1975 : Pres, VP, PM, Lok Sabha Speaker elections not judicially reviewable
Struck down 39th CA as judicial review, free/fair elections are basic structure
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) :
First case of application of Basic Structure Doctrine
Removed Art 19(1)(f) and Art 31[Art 31(1), 31(2)] as FR to Property, inserted Art 300A, Art 31A-C
44th CA 1978 :
retained, (Constitutional/Legal Right available for all persons subject to certain restrictions)
PM : M. Desai Art 31C : All DPSP > 14,19 (Art 31 removed)
Struck down Art 368(4) and Art 368(5)
Minerva Mills v. UoI (1980)
Art 31 C : (restored to pre 42nd position) : 39(b)(c)>14,19 with Judicial Review
FRs and DPSP must be co-read harmoniously
Laws added to IXth Sch after Kesavananda Bharti case can be challenged on grounds of
Wama Rao v. UoI (1981):
Basic Structure but laws added before Kesavanada can’t be. (Doctrine of prospective
overruling)
Laws added to IXth Sch after Kesavananda Bharti case can be challenged on
IR Ceolho v. State of TN (2007) : Basic Structure
Essential Features
Art 14,15,19,21 specifically as well.
SC AoR Assn. v UoI (2015): (4th Judges Case) : 99th CA (NJAC) struck down;Independence of Judiciary is Basic Structure
Madras Bar Association v. UoI (2015) : Not just CA under Art 368, Ordinary laws also can’t violate Basic Structure.
Anjum Qadri v. UoI (2024) (UP Madrassa): Must be specifically shown as to how ordinary laws violate basic structure.
Art 31C’s position as per Minerva Mills and Kesavananda
Property Owners Association v. State of MH (2024): Bharti is valid.
All kinds and nature of property is not included in ‘material
resources’ as per Art 39(b), can limit Govt acquisition of
Property
Ingredients of Basic Structure (not defined in CoI)
Core Constitutional Principles
Principles Cases
Limitations of amending
Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
power under Art 368
Rights Related
Principles Cases
Balance between FRs and DPSPs Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
Concept of social and economic justice, Kesavanada Bharti v. State of Kerala (1973)
DPSP in toto Bhim Singh JI v. Union of India (1981)
Principles Cases
Parliamentary Democracy & Multi Party Systems Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006)
Judiciary Related
Principles Cases
SC Powers under Art 32, 136, 141, 142 Delhi Judicial Service Association v. State of Gujarat (1991)
Effective Access to Justice Central Coal Fields v. Jaiswal Coal Co. (1980)
By CJI or next senior most SC Judge By CJ of State HC or next senior most HC Judge
Oath
Oath mentioned in Art 62 itself. Oath mentioned in Art 159 itself.
Criteria President
CoI
Provisions
Pres & VP Elections Act, 1952 and 1974 Rules
Electors Elected Members of LS, RS, SLA, and LA of UT of Delhi & Puducherry
Method Indirect Election | Proportional Representation | Single Transferrable Vote (Preference Marked)
Ballot Secret
Authority Election Commission of India, Returning Officer - Sec Gen, Lok Sabha/Rajya Sabha on rotation
Disputes SC ONLY
Repeat for all States & add up General Election: Citizens vote for electors within their states who
pledge to support their chosen candidate
Calculate the no of times each MP’s Each state gets as many electors as it has members of Congress
vote be counted (House and Senate)
MP Votes
Total MLA Value Votes Except Maine & Nebraska, rest have ‘winner takes all’ - winner gets
Total No of Elected MPs all the electoral votes for that state, possibility of Swing States,
Possible to win Election without winning popular vote (happened 5
Total MP Votes times, last in 2016 - Trump defeating Hillary Clinton)
Total MPs(e) x Value of Each MP Vote
Electoral College Voting: Electors cast their votes for president and vice
president (Total 270/538 needed to win, California has highest no
More than 50% of total MP + MLA Votes electors)
Appoints
RS Nominated Members SLC Nominated Members
(Legislature)
Appoints
All SC and HC Judges Subordinate Judiciary’s Judges
(Judiciary)
VP
All State Ministers
All Union Ministers
Gives Oath All MLAs/MLCs (Directly or someone on her
All MPs (Directly or someone on her behalf)
to behalf)
SC Judges
HC Judges
CAG
Executive Power
If prior recommendation was needed but was not taken, but bill was given assent, then bill can’t be
What if?
invalidated (Art 255)
No timeline to decide
T&C
If houses repass the bill after it was returned then Pres/Gov has to give assent
Relief/
Punishment Length Punishment Type/Character
Clemency
Remit Reduced (eg. 7 years jail to 4 years jail) Remains the same
Pres can give any clemency/relief for Governor can give any clemency/relief
Court Martial Laws enacted by State Legislature
Scope Laws enacted by Parliament Governor can commute, suspend or give respite for
Death Penalty death penalty but NOT PARDON
Disqualify MPs on ECI Advice (Art 103) Disqualify MLA/MLCs on ECI Advice (Art 192)
Criteria Governor
Sarkaria (1983) Eminent Person from outside the state and away from Political Life
Oath of Office & Secrecy administered by Pres/Gov respectively as per III Schedule
Office Terms
Salaries, allowances as per Sch II until Parl or State Law.
CoM (U/S) include (Constitution does not classify COM into different ranks)
PM/CM (Head)
Composition Minister/Cabinet Minister (higher rank, large portfolios)
Minister of State (MoS)/Deputy Minister (assist Cabinet Ministers)
Minister of State (Independent Charge) (smaller portfolios, report directly to PM/CM)
Not more than 15% of total strength of respective lower houses (91st CA, 2003)
Quantum
CG, JH, MP, OD to compulsorily have a Min of SC,ST,OBC welfare
Cabinet
Important Ministers, only mentioned in Constitution via 44th CA, 1978, to ensure
written advice for emergency proclamation under Art 352 (National Emergency) is
given to Pres.
Groupings
Cabinet Committee
(Only referring to
Subject wise groups of Ministers such as
[Link])
Appointments, Accommodation, Economic Affairs, Security, Economic Affairs,
Parliamentary Affairs, Political Affairs, Investment & Growth, Skill Development,
Employment, Livelihood
PM chairs all except Accommodation and Parliamentary Affairs (Chaired by HM)
President
Lok Sabha Rajya Sabha
Single/Joint Committees
Govt/Private/Independent Govt/Private/Independent
Members Members
House Leader Adhoc/Standing House Leader
Opposition Leader Committees Opposition Leader
Whips Whips
COMPOSED OF
Governor
Legislative Assembly* Legislative Council^
Select/Joint Committees
Chair Panel Chair Panel
Departmentally Related
Govt/Private/Independent Standing Committess Govt/Private/Independent
Members Members
House Leader House Leader
Opposition Leader Adhoc/Standing Opposition Leader
Whips Committees Whips
SLA Sectt. : Sec Gen + Officers SLC Sectt. : Sec Gen + Officers
UTs of DL, PY, J&K also have ^only UP, BH, AP, TL, KN, MH
SLAs* have SLCs (mentioned in CoI)
Criteria LS RS
Represents All States & [Link] (Elected Only) States, UTs with LA (Elected & Nominated)
Permanent
5 yrs (1/3rd Retire every 2 years)
Full Term Member Elected for 5 yrs Full Term Member Elected for 6 yrs
Term
Member elected to fill a vacancy serves for Member elected to fill a vacancy serves for
remaining LS term remaining term of that vacant seat
Elections are generally conducted Bi-annually
Total LS Constituencies
Based on 1976 Census State Population as per 1971 Census
Initially till 2000 via 42 CA, ‘76 Mentioned in Sch IV, CoI, 1950
Basis Extended till 2026 via 84 CA, ‘01 (no specific method to calculate seat allocation to
LS Constituencies within a state states)
Based on 2001 Census
Mentioned in Sch I, RoPA, 1950
Represents Within State (Elected Only) Within State (Elected & Nominated)
Permanent
5 yrs
(1/3rd Retire every 2 years)
Full Term Member Elected for 5 yrs
Tenure Full Term Member Elected for 6 yrs
Member elected to fill a vacancy serves for
Member elected to fill a vacancy serves for
remaining LS term
remaining term of that vacant seat
State wise
Sch II, RoPA, 1950 Sch III, RoPA, 1950
Allocation
Provisions CoI, Respective House Rules CoI, Pres & VP Pres Elections Act, 1952
Qualification Member of the House 35 Yrs | Citizen | RS Member Eligible | No Office of Profit
Electors All members of the respective house All members of both houses
Indirect Election
Proportional Representation with Single
Method Indirect Election
Transferrable Vote (Preference Marked)
Vote Value : 1 for each MP
Final
Simple Majority Votes Needed (Quota) = (Total Votes/2) + 1
Majority
Conventionally,
Leaning Speaker from Ruling Party None
Dy Speaker from Opposition
Nomenclatures/Key Offices
Type Meaning
Private Member Any member who is NOT a Minister, can do everything except introduce Budget
Elected Party
Elected on party ticket
Member
Elected Independent
Elected without party ticket
Member
Nominated Member (Joined a party within 6 months) : Treated like a Party Member
Nominated Member
Nominated Member (Not joined a party within 6 months) : Treated like an independent
Leader of the House If PM is LS Member, then PM is LoH, PM appoints senior most Min as RS LoH
Whips Each party has a Whip to ensure presence, voting, participation in discussions
Nationality Citizen (in any manner) [All member elections conducted by ECI]
Age
25 Yrs 30 Yrs 25 Yrs 30 Yrs
(CoI)
Registered Voter in
Eligibility Registered Voter in Registered Voter in Registered Voter in any
any Assembly
(RoPA, any Parliamentary any Parliamentary Assembly Constituency of
Constituency of the
1950) Constituency Constituency the specific state
specific state
Proportional Rep.
Election Proportional Rep. with
First Past the Post with Single First Past the Post
Format Single Transferrable Vote
Transferrable Vote
1/3rd by MLAs
Min Votes Needed 1/3rd by Local Bodies
to win RS Seat from (Mentioned in RoPA,
specific state = 1950)
Process 1 Vote = 1 value 1 Vote = 1 value
1/12th TGT Teachers
since 3 yrs
1/12th Graduates since
3 yrs.
Oath Sch III, By Pres or someone on her behalf Sch III, By Gov or someone on her behalf
Constitution
Art 105/194 : Speech & Vote (Except on Corrupt Actions - Sita Soren Case - 2024)
Art 122 : Parliamentary Proceedings are not judicially reviewable
Immunities
Art 361A : True Publication of legislative proceedings
/Privileges/
CPC - Sec 135A : Can’t be arrested 40 days before, during, and after a session
Contempt
Rules of Procedure of Houses : Presiding Officer should be informed of any police or judicial action
(Not
against a member
singularly
British Parliamentary Conventions also applicable
codified)
Presiding Officer also has suo-moto powers, can refer to Privileges Committee also, House decides -
If Member found guilty - apology/suspension/disqualification/jail/fine
If non-member found guilty - apology/jail/fine
Every breach of privilege is also a contempt of house, but every contempt of house is not breach of privilege.
When any of the privileges either of the members individually or of the House in its collective capacity are disregarded
or attacked by any individual or authority, the offence is called a breach of privilege.
Any obstruction put before Houses or its members in due discharge of their duties, amounts to contempt of the House
Privileges also apply to non members who can participate but not vote - Attorney General/Advocate General
Electoral Disqualifications
Sec 8A, RoPA 1951 : Convicted for ‘Corrupt Practices’ defined under s. 123
Pres
S. 123 : Bribery, undue influence, or coercion etc.
Corrupt on binding
Court order should be presented before President within 3 months.
Practices ECI advice
Max 6 year ban (depending on case to case)
{Corrupt Practices & Electoral Offences are completely differently defined terms under RoPA 1951)
Sec 8, RoPA 1951 : 6 Year Ban (If only fined then from date of conviction, if jailed then from
release), [doesn’t matter if conviction appealed, (Lily Thomas Case, 2013)]
Convicted under following laws irrespective of type/nature of punishment
Civil Rights Act 1955, Customs Act 1962, UAPA 1967, Narcotics (NDPA) 1985, Religious
Institutions 1988, Places of Worship Act 1991, National Honour Act 1971, Sati
(Prevention) Act 1988, Corruption Act 1988,
Some Offences - BNS (IPC) (Promoting enmity, bribery, rape, cruelty)
Some electoral offences under RoPA 1951 (booth capturing, tampering ballot paper etc) (All
Automatic
electoral offences do not lead to disqualification, only those mentioned/cross referenced under
Statutory (by Court
Sec 8, electoral offences lead to punishments, fines, and sometimes cancellation of elections)
Violations Order/ECI)
Convicted under following laws with minimum jail of 6 months
Any law about Hoarding/profiteering/adulteration of food or drugs,
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
Convicted under any other law apart from those mentioned above with min 2 yrs jail
Sec 9, RoPA 1951 : Disqualified for 5 years if dismissed due to disloyalty/corruption
Sec 9A, RoPA 1951 : Disqualified TILL member is having commercial contracts with Union/State
Sec 10. RoPA 1951 : Disqualified TILL member is Manager, Agent of any company which is 25%
owned by Union/State (Except cooperative societies)
Sec 10. RoPA 1951 : ECI can disqualify for 3 yrs if elections expenses not filed properly
House Tenures
Baggage Principle (Discussed in class) : Anything actively unfinished from the previous LS
lapses before the new LS begins. Applies to LA/SLC.
All legislative business other than bills pending before lower houses ends with dissolution.
Assurances given by Ministers in the Lower Houses DO NOT lapse upon dissolution
As per CoI, houses must meet once within 6 months, Conventionally, houses meet thrice a
year.
Budget, Monsoon, Winter
Sessions Sessions can convened or ended (prorogued) by the President/Gov respectively ANYTIME.
Dates to convene Parliamentary session finalised by Cabinet Comm. on Parliamentary
Affairs. Communicated to House Sectt by Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs.
No impact whatsoever on any pending bills, legislative business
On a specific day
Only counted as a sitting
if Presiding Officer is present
Sitting 1/10th of Total Members of the House are present
Can be ended by Presiding Officer anytime
With the next date fixed - Adjournment
Without the next date fixed : Adjournment sine die
Parliamentary Procedures
Reverse for RS
Listed as Urgent
Zero Hour Raise urgent issues than can’t wait for notice periods Same day Ballot
Public Imp.
Calling LSR 197, RSR Urgent Public Imp. specifically towards a Minister, LS - Ballot, RS - Chair
Same Day
Attn. 180 response must for original issue and follow up. after consulting BAC
No
Trust vote for Govt to prove support Minimum support of
Confidence LSR 198 Same day
If voted and passed, govt. must resign. 50 MPs
Motion
Special Tools
Types of Bills
Every bill must be passed by both LS & RS/SLA & SLC (wherever applicable) and receive assent from Pres/Gov respectively.
Member Joint
Type of Bills Ingredients Prior Recco House Pref Maj. Assent
Pref Sitting
Taxes, CFI,
CoFI, Govt Yes, LS
Money None Yes, Pres Simple No Yes/No
Funding LS>RS
Borrowings
Ordinary +
Money Yes, LS Yes/No
Fin Bill I None Yes, Pres Simple Yes
(More Money LS = RS /Return
than Ordinary)
Ordinary +
Money Yes/No
Fin Bill II None Yes, Pres. None Simple Yes
(More Ordinary /Return
than Money)
Yes
Simple/
ONLY
CoI Amend. Art 368 None None None Spl II/ No
for CA
Spl III
u/A368
Passage of a Bill
Stages Exceptions
Assent
Components Details
Govt Receipts & Expenditures for current year, previous year, and next financial yr.
Expenditure should clearly mention
Expenses charged to CFI - non votable/only discussed
Salary, Allowances, Pension - Pres, SC Judges, CAG, Vigilance Commissions, UPSC
Annual Fin. Statement
Salary, Allowances - Presiding Officers of LS & RS, HC Judges
Debt Charges/Court Order Enforcement etc.
Expenses made from CFI - votable/discussed
President shall have this laid before both Houses (Art 112)
Finance Bill Changes to the country’s existing tax laws with an explanatory memorandum
Stages
Discussion on DFGs
Selected DFGs are discussed and voted
are selected on the recommendation of the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, which holds a meeting with
leaders of all parties to arrive at the list of Ministries.
The allocated time is split between parties based on their strength by Speaker
3rd Part Rest are ‘guillotined’ (vote w/o discussion)
Authorising expenditure
The DFGs are consolidated into an Appropriation Bill to sanction the proposed expenditure
This allows govt to withdraw from CFI
Authorising tax changes:
Finance Bill is taken up and passed after DFG Discussion
Lok Sabha must discuss and pass both the Appropriation and Finance Bills to allow implementation of budget
proposals
RS has recommendatory role as these are Money Bills
During DFG Discussion, MPs can move Cut Motions. These motions are a way to initiate a discussion on the DFGs, and express a
disapproval of the expenditure or the policy underlying the expenditure. If a cut motion is passed, the government is expected to resign
but not compulsory. Only in LS and not RS.
Disapproval of a Policy Cut: Aims to reduce the demand from a Ministry to Re 1. This indicates a disapproval of the policy
underlying the specific demand.
Economy Cut: Aims to reduce the demand from a Ministry by a specific amount
Token Cut: Aims to reduce the demand from a Ministry by Rs 100 to express a specific grievance.
During the year if Govt needs more money, can be done through Supplementary Grants
Passed as Appropriation Bills
During election year of whenever expected that budget will take longer to pass, then Vote on Account is approved for a suitable
proportion of the estimated expenditure
General Services,
Social Services,
Expenditure Economic Services,
Grants-in aid and
Revenue Contribution
General Services,
Social Services,
Economic Services,
Public Debt,
Loans and Advances,
Contingency Fund (Art 267) Inter-State Settlement,
Transfer to Contingency
Placed at the disposal of the Pres. to fund
facilitate meeting of urgent unforeseen
expenditure by the Govt pending
authorisation from the Parliament.
Later, after parliamentary approval, money
taken out of CFI and CoFI is replenished.
Jt: Total 22 Elected by LS Examines CAG reports PSUs. (Minister can’t be a member)
Comm. on PSU
15(LS) + 7(RS) & RS Comprehensive, Horizontal, and Sectoral Audits of PSUs.
Estimates
Select : 30 Elected by LS Assists with Parliament’s scrutiny over govt’s exp. and general policies (LS Only)
Comm.
Speaker & Temporary investigative Committees set up for a specific reason and duration to
Jt Parl Comm. Varies
Chair examine issues of public importance or Bills
Govt Select Speaker & Examines assurances made by ministers on the Parl’s floor, and submits reports
Assurances 15(LS)/10(RS) Chair on the status of implementation
Subordinate Speaker & Scrutinises rules and regulations made by the executive under delegated
Select
Legislation Chair legislation
Select Speaker & Examines the Rules of Procedure of the House and recommends any
Rules
15(LS)/16(RS) Chair amendments or addition (Spkr/Chair heads)
Higher Tribunals
Judiciary
High Court
Gram Nyayalayas
Key Insights
1 SC, 25 HCs, 688 District Courts, Additional sub-district courts may operate at the block level.
No State can have more than 1 HC, but can have regional benches and some High Courts have jurisdiction over multiple States & UTs
Bom HC cover MH, Goa, Dadar and Nagar Haveli & Daman & Diu and has regional benches in Nagpur & Aurangabad
SC & HC Judges are appointed by Pres. on basis of a judicially invented ‘Collegium System’ evolved from - 1st. 2nd 3rd Judges Cases and
subordinate judges are appointed by the Governor.
Each State has its own judicial service for the subordinate judiciary, and HC judges are mostly selected from the State’s judicial service
and the State HC’s practising lawyers. State’s judicial service is a competitive exam conducted by SPSC in consultation with state HC.
The judicial service in the subordinate judiciary in a State will generally be broken up between the regular judicial service and the
higher judicial service
District and Sessions Court Judges will be in the more senior cadre, while civil judges and magistrates will be in the lower cadre
Members of the bar can be recruited directly into the senior cadre if they have practised as advocates for 7 years or more -
District Judges require 7 yrs of experience as an advocate and are appointed by Gov after being recommended by concerned HC.
In most States, original jurisdiction for both civil and criminal matters begins in the subordinate courts
In metropolitan areas the distinction between JMFC or JMSC is absent and they are collectively referred to as MM.
Scope of sentencing increases with increase in hierarchy. Under the BNSS (CrPC), a JMFC may pass a sentence of imprisonment <
1 yr, while CJM can pass a sentence <7 yrs.
On the civil side, there is more State variation. Each State has a civil courts act under which a judge will have jurisdiction to hear
a case depending on the monetary amount at stake in the suit.
District courts also house family courts, juvenile courts, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) courts, rent control courts, and other
specialised courts created under specific legislation. Judges from the regular judicial service cadre will be appointed to these postings
For some particular local areas, State governments may, after consultation with the High Court of that State, establish a special court
staffed by JMFC/JMSC to try particular cases or classes of offences (only murder or rape cases)
Judges from the regular judicial cadre are also appointed to administrative posts (ie, as court registrars and other key administrative
staff in the judiciary)
SC and HC are both Constitutional Courts. Detailed note on their Powers of Judicial Review already covered under PCN 10.
[Link] | contact@[Link] | [Link]
PCN 15 : MCP 2025 : Atish Mathur
Higher Judiciary :Governing & Structural Provisions
Laws & Rules SC Cases Judicial Rules Conventions
Criteria SC HC
Appointed by Pres. after consulting SC & HC Judges (Art 124) Pres (CoI) (Art 217)
Citizen AND
Citizen AND
HC Judge for 5 Years OR
Judicial Office for 10 Years OR
Qualifications HC Lawyer for 10 Years OR
HC Lawyer for 10 Years OR
Distinguished Jurist as per the President
No minimum age
No minimum age
Security Salary & Pension charged to CFI Salary charged to CFS, pension charged to CFI
Strength Max 34 incl. CJI, Parl. by law to specify exact strength President (no max strength per HC)
Retirement 65 yrs (Can’t practice in any court after) 62 yrs (Can’t practice in same HC and all lower courts)
Resignation to President
Removal : By the President after Parliament Process : Grounds : Proven Misbehaviour or Incapacity
Authority : Parliament : Special Maj II, Process (Judges Inquiry Act, 1968)
Vacancy Motion in any house
Supported by 100 (LS) or 50 (RS), Presiding Officer may accept or reject the motion
3 member committee : CJI/SC (J) + CJ-HC/HC(J) + Distinguished Jurist, Committee report not binding
Special Majority II
Delhi, can be changed and also be at multiple locations Each State must have a HC, Parl by law can provide
Seat
as decided by CJI after Pres. Approval. for common HCs.
Type SC HC
Criteria SC HC
Both SC(Art 129) and HC (Art 215) are courts of record, all judgements etc shall be recorded till eternity.
Permanence
Also, this allows for both courts to also punish for contempt since everything is on record.
Source
Art 129 : SC can punish for contempt of itself
Art 142 : enforcement of any order
Contempt Act, 1976 + SC Rules, 2013
Contempt Act, 1976 Source
Civil Contempt : disobeying SC order Art 215 : HC can punish for contempt of itself
Criminal Contempt : disrespecting SC or SC judge Contempt Act, 1976 : Contempt of lower courts as
SC Rules, 2013 well
Contempt
Contempt inside Court Contempt Act, 1976 :
punished immediately or on later date Civil Contempt : disobeying HC/Lower court order
Contempt outside Court Criminal Contempt : disrespecting HC/lower court or
suo moto HC judge/lower court
petition by Attorney/Solicitor General
petition by any person,
If criminal contempt is alleged, then written
consent of Attorney/Solicitor General is needed
Art 138:
Parl can enhance NOT reduce SC powers acc. Union List
After agreement between GoI & Govt of a state, Parl can
enhance SC jurisdiction over agreed issue.
More Powers NA
Art 139: Parl can enhance SC writ powers beyond FR
Art 140: Parl can enhance SC powers irrespective of
constitutional provisions for better use of its jurisdiction
[SC (Enlargement of Crim. Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, ‘70]
SC Staff CJI subject to Parl Law appoints SC officers (CFI Charged) CJHC subject to state law appoints HC officers (CFS Charged)
Independence of Judiciary
Jurisdiction SC HC
(Both SC and HC can overrule/review earlier judgements of respective smaller benches but only SC can review the same
judgement again through review petitions). SC/HC overruling lower court judgements is regular appellate function NOT review.
Substitutes/subordinate to HC
(Depending on the Governing
Act)
Appeals to SC (Substitutes) Lowest subordinate court Deemed to be a decree of a civil court and
NGT, Central Admin , Estd for every panchayat at is final and binding on all parties
Hierarchy National Consumer the intermediate level No appeal
Commission, Armed Limited appeals to District No court fee/refund of earlier paid court
Forces Court and HC (Art 227) fee
Appeals to HC (Subordinate)
Income Tax, Customs
Excise
NALSA
SC Legal Services Committee
CJI
Set up by NALSA Eligibility
Sitting/Retd SC Judge (exec chair) Women and Children
Sitting SC Judge (Chair)
(Nominated by Pres after CJI Scheduled caste
Other expert members nominated by
Consultation) Scheduled Tribes
CJI as per govt prescribed
Other expert members nominated by Industrial Workmen
qualifications Persons with Disability
Govt after CJI consultation
Persons in Custody
Victims of Human trafficking
Victims of Natural Disasters,
SLSA
HC Legal Services Committee Ethnic/caste violence,
CJ-HC Industrial Disaster
Set up by SLSA
Sitting/Retd HC Judge (exec chair) Persons with an annual income of less
Sitting HC Judge (Chair)
(Nominated by Pres after CJI than Rs 1,00,000/- Or as notified by the
Other expert members nominated by
Consultation) Central/State Governments
CJHC as per govt prescribed 5,00,000 for SC LSC
Other expert members nominated by
qualifications (Legal Aid includes ALL legal costs incurred)
Govt after CJ-HC consultation
Lawyers
Type Description
Advocates Advocates Act, 1961: enrolled with any bar council, can practice in any court, can’t be full time employed
Advocates Act, 1961: only in SC/HC, right to pre-audience - heard before other advocates, can’t take clients directly,
Sr. Advocates SC/HC have their own guidelines to designate advocates as Senior Advocates, their certification necessary for a
curative petition to be filed.
Advocates on Only in SC, only AoR can file and argue cases in SC, other lawyers can argue if AoR allows in a case. Selection through
Record a written exam - 4 yrs exp and 1 yr training under AoR mandatory before appearing in exam.
Amicus Curiae SC allots a lawyer to unrepresented, compulsory for criminal cases, discretionary for civil cases
Art 76 - highest legal officer, appointed by Pres, qualifications same as to become a SC judge, term of 3 yrs.
Right to an audience (right to conduct legal proceedings) in all courts
Attorney General Right to take part in proceedings of both Houses of the Parliament, parliamentary committees, but cannot vote,
enjoys all the MP privileges
Can only represent the Govt
SG & Addl. SG 2nd/3rd highest legal offrs, statutory post, appointed by Pres for 3 yrs as per Appts. Cabinet Committee.
Art 156 - highest legal officer in the state, apptd by Governor, qualifications same as a HC judge, term of 3 yrs.
Advocate General
Powers, functions, position similar of Attorney General
Overview
Important Insights
Our Constitution does not provide for a rigid separation of legislative powers between the Union and States. This is reflected through
the existence of concurrent list and some subjects in the state list subject to the Union list as explicitly mentioned in the CoI. (e.g. -
Entry 17 of State List (Water) subject to Entry 56 of Union List (inter state rivers)
Sch VII does not defined legislative competence, it simply outlines the scope or areas or fields of law making
There are NO specific taxation powers in the Concurrent List.
While Legislative Relations and Administrative Relations are explicitly mentioned as Chapters in CoI, there is no such thing as ‘Financial
Relations’.
State lists to be interpreted as per Union and Concurrent List (Art 246)
Concurrent Lists : Union > State (Art 254)
Union List has most subjects
Residuary powers with the Parliament (Art 248)
Scenarios where Parliament can makes laws on State List Subjects :
RS passes a resolution with Special Maj II in National Interest or GST related laws authorising the Parl to make law on state list
entries (Art 249)
Such a law can be made for entire/partial Territory of India till validity of the resolution
Resolution is valid for a year and can be extended for 1 more year by same majority
During National Emergency, Parliament can make laws on all lists incl. state list. and GST for entire/partial Territory of India (Art
250)
Only when the Parl actually makes laws under Art 249/250 is when state laws/law making powers becomes restricted. Even if
resolutions and proclamations are passed/issued respectively, unless follow up Parl Laws are made, state powers are not restricted
(Art 251)
2 or more states pass a resolution using simple majority authorising the Parl to make a law on the State List (Art 252)
Other states can also adopt the same law by passing a resolution using simple majority
Such a law made can only be amended by the Parliament and not the State legislatures concerned.
If law needs to be made on a state list subject to implement an international treaty, the Parl can without any spl permission. (Art
253)
Pres. can authorise the Parl. to exercise powers of the concerned state legislature during Pres Rule (Art 356)
Parl. can make laws for Union Territories without a legislature/any territory not a state on any subject in any list (Art 246)
Parl. can set up courts for better administration of Union Laws (Art 247)
A bill imposing reasonable restrictions in public interest on inter/intra state trade and commerce w.r.t a specific state cannot be
introduced in that specific state without prior recommendation of the President [Art 304(b)]
Governor can reserve any bill for President (Art 200) (Governor’s constitutional discretion, not bound by State CoM Advice)
State Bills that should/must be reserved for Pres. Assent by Governor after being passed by the state legislatures
state bill about land acquisition/merging companies etc. (proviso to Art 31A)
state bill implementing Art 39(b)(c) (proviso to Art 31C)
state bill adversely affecting the powers of the HC as envisaged in CoI (proviso to Art 200)
state bill on concurrent list when central law exists (exception of Union Law > State Law in Concurrent List) [Art 254(2)]
state bill taxing water/electricity provided by any authority created by Parl Law [Art 288(2)]
state money and financial bills (I and II) passed during Financial Emergency if such direction issued [Art 360(4)(ii)]
Provision Meaning/Description
State executive power to be used in adherence with Parliamentary Laws and Union can use its executive power in to
Art 256
ensure states are adhering to parliamentary laws. for eg - to implement Untouchability laws made by Parl.
PRINCIPLE : Both the Union and States can delegate their functions to each other with mutual consent
Pres. can allot Union Executive functions to states WITH their consent
Art 258 Parl can authorise using state machinery with necessary powers to implement Union Laws. State consent is not
needed in this case. (C>S)
Art 258A: states via Governor can entrust state functions to the Union with Union consent.
Art 260 Union has exclusive jurisdiction over territories outside India
Full faith & credit to be given to laws, records, judicial proceedings across territory of India to ensure national
Art 261
recognition, validity, and enforcement.
Provision Meaning/Description
Parliament by law can provide for separate redressal mechanism for inter state water disputes and such a law can
even restrict SC jurisdiction for the same.
Parl created Inter State Water Disputes Act, 1956 which allows for creating specific tribunals solving disputes.
Central Govt can create a tribunal after receiving a complaint from a state govt
Such a tribunal is only created if the Centre also agrees so.
Art 262 If above both conditions are satisfied then, tribunal must be created within a year of state complaint.
Central Water Commission is a premier Technical Organisation in the field of Water Resources and is presently
functioning as an attached office of the Ministry of Jal Shakti.
Work includes initiating, coordinating and furthering in consultation of the State Governments concerned,
schemes for control, conservation and utilisation of water resources throughout the country, for purpose of
Flood Control, Irrigation, Navigation, Drinking Water Supply and Water Power Development
Finance Relations
Inter alia, Finance Commission recommends the basis of distribution of duties/taxes between the Centre & States from the divisible pool
GST
Art 273: Grants-in-aid will be given to the States of Assam, Bihar, Odhisa and West Bengal in lieu of export duty on the jute
products. The sums of such grants are prescribed by the President with the consultation of the Finance Commission.
Art. 275: Parliament to make such grants, as it may deem essential, to the States which are in need of financial assistance.
Grants Also provides for special grants given to the States which undertake schemes of development for the"purpose of promoting
the welfare of the SC/ST. Assam gets a special grant for this purpose.
Finance Commission recommends principles for distribution of these grants. These are also called statutory grants.
Art. 282: Both the Union and a State make grant for any 'public purpose’, even if it relates to a subject matter over which it
cannot make laws.
These are also called discretionary grants as they are at the discretion of the Centre,
Borrowing Art 292 : Union can borrow keeping CFI as security and conditions can be set by Parliament.
Art 293 : State Executive can also borrow keeping CFS as security and conditions can be set by State Legislature.
Centre can also give loans to states as long as overall Parliamentary Limits under Art 292 are not breached.
States normally can’t raise more loans if there’s a pending Central Loan.
Otherwise free, Parliament can impose reasonable conditions on freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse in public interest.
Unless dealing with scarcity of goods, no law can be made by either Parl. or state legislatures creating any preference/discrimination.
State legislatures can impose taxes of outside goods coming into the state so as to not have any discrimination against internally produced
goods.
State legislatures can also impose reasonable conditions on freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse in public interest but such a bill
would require Pres Sanction to be introduced in the state legislature (C>S)
PS : All bodies including the ones referred here are to be dealt separately under a different Concise Note.
Emergency
Grounds
Indian security threatened by external aggression/armed
rebellion (previously internal disturbance till 44th CA, 1978)
Imposed thrice
1961 & 71 : external aggression
1975 : internal disturbance
Conditions (Art 353 & Art 354)
Union Cabinet must recommend Nat. Emergency to Pres. in
writing (44th CA, 1978)
Proclamation valid for 6 months.
Can be imposed if before, during, and after external
Approval
aggression/armed rebellion
LS & RS both should pass with Spl Maj
If LS is dissolved, then RS approval for time being is valid, LS
II within 30 days.
can approve within 30 days of next session.
Extension/Duration
Art 20 & 21 can’t be suspended (44th CA, 1978)
Indefinitely, 6 months at a time.
Only emergency laws are protected from being challenged in
Revocation
court of law and no other laws which are not related to the
National By Pres
emergency
(Art 352) LS - simple Maj.
(44th CA, 1978)
If LS not in session, 1/10th members
Impact (Art 353 & Art 354)
can send a notice to Spkr/Pres
Union executive power shall extend to the giving of any
expressing intent to end emergency.
direction to any State in the declared emergency area
Special sitting must be conducted
Parl. can make laws on State List
in 14 days.
President can alter the distribution of revenues that are
normally for states
such orders to be placed immediately before Parl.
LS and SLA can be extended by 1 yr at a time & not
extending in any case beyond a period of six months after
the proclamation ceased to exist
Art 19 automatically suspended but only when grounds are
ext. aggression (44th CA, 1978)
such orders to be placed immediately before Parl. (44th
CA, 1978)
(National Emergency makes India Unitary, it does not lead to
dissolution/suspension of State Legislatures/Executive)
Grounds
threat to Indian financial stability or credit
Approval Conditions (Art 353 & Art 354)
LS & RS both should pass with Simple Pres must be satisfied of the situation
Maj within 60 days. If LS is dissolved, then RS approval for time being is valid, LS
Financial
Extension/Duration can approve within 30 days of next session.
(Art 360)
Indefinitely Impact (Art 353 & Art 354)
Revocation Union can give any direction to states to observe financial
By Pres prudence such as reducing salaries of state employees
President can also issue similar directions such as reducing
salaries of union employees, SC/HC judges.
Provs. Article 371 to 371J(Part XXI) Art 244 Art 244 & Art 275