Introduction
Intersectionality, a term first presented by Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989, became a primary system
inside contemporary sociologies and feminist theory (Crenshaw, 1989). At first conceptualized
to scrutinize the impediments of hostile to segregation regulations in tending to the intensified
encounters of black women, Intersectionality has since developed into a broadly involved focal
point for breaking down how covering social characteristics — like race, orientation, class,
sexuality, handicap, and religion — cooperate with frameworks of ability to shape lived
encounters (Crenshaw, 1991). Crenshaw’s pioneering work highlighted how traditional single-
axis approaches to social justice fail to capture the complexities of intersecting identities,
prompting a more nuanced understanding of oppression and privilege (Crenshaw, 1989;
Crenshaw, 1991).
This essay critically assesses how intersectionality has developed socio-historically and critically
examines its helpfulness as a hypothetical point of view. It follows the advancement of the
system from its starting points in lawful grant to its more extensive applications in areas like
social science, education, medical services, and public strategy (Davis, 2008; Collins, 1990). The
conversation will dig into the qualities of intersectionality in testing customary equality,
diversity, and inclusion (EDI) practices, especially its capacity to destroy various leveled and
exclusionary frameworks by focusing marginalized voices (Collins, 1990; McCall, 2005).
However, the system has not been without critique. Researchers have scrutinized its theoretical
ambiguity, strategic difficulties, and likely constraints in useful application (Davis, 2008; Puar,
2012). This essay will draw in with these studies while investigating how intersectionality keeps
on developing as a dynamic and groundbreaking instrument for tending to fundamental
disparities. Through theoritical talk and contextual analyses or case study, the exposition expects
to offer a nuanced assessment of the system's pertinence and utility in understanding and tending
to the intricacies of social disparities. Thusly, it will feature the basic job intersectionality plays
in progressing comprehensive and evenhanded practices while additionally thinking about its
restrictions and regions for future development.
Historical and Legislative Context of EDI Practices
The Development of EDI Legislation and Policies
The socio-political evolution of equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) legislation has
profoundly shaped the discourse around equality and inclusivity in modern society. From
landmark movements like the Civil Rights Movement in the United States (McAdam, 1982) to
administrative structures, for example, the Correspondence Demonstration of 2010 in the UK
(Government Balances Office, 2010), these endeavours have been instrumental in tending to
foundational segregation and advancing decency across different social aspects. Universally,
comparable drives, for example, South Africa's Work Value Act (1998) (Republic of South
Africa, 1998) and the European Association's Orientation Fairness Technique (European
Commission, 2020), highlight a common obligation to fighting segregation in view of race,
orientation, class, handicap, sexuality, and different tomahawks of persecution.
The Social equality Development of the 1960s denoted a defining moment in the battle against
racial isolation and segregation, finishing in the Social liberties Demonstration of 1964 (U.S.
Congress, 1964), which banned segregation in view of race, variety, religion, sex, or public
beginning in the U.S. This act turned into a model for ensuing official endeavors around the
world, stressing the requirement for institutional responsibility in advancing correspondence
(Chime, 1992). Likewise, the UK’s Equality Act 2010 consolidated previous anti-discrimination
laws into a single framework, offering protection against discrimination on multiple grounds,
including race, gender, disability, age, and sexual orientation (Hepple, 2010). These lawful
achievements have essentially progressed civil rights by setting least guidelines for fair treatment
and making systems for legitimate review (Fredman, 2011).
Nonetheless, regardless of their groundbreaking effects, these strategies frequently take on a
solitary pivot approach that ignores the interconnected idea of characters (Crenshaw, 1989). By
treating classifications of separation — like race, orientation, or inability — as secluded issues,
these systems coincidentally make storehouses. For instance, against segregation regulations
could address the difficulties looked by ladies or minorities independently however neglect to
represent the intensified disparities looked by People of color or handicapped eccentric people
(Bowleg, 2012). This hole in regulation features the restrictions of conventional EDI rehearses in
tending to the intricacies of multifaceted separation.
Furthermore, while these policies provide a foundation for tackling systemic inequities, they
often struggle to address structural power dynamics that perpetuate exclusion (Collins, 2000).
Intersectionality, as a theoretical framework, has emerged as a critical response to this gap,
emphasizing the need for holistic approaches that consider the unique experiences of individuals
at the intersections of multiple marginalized identities (Cho, Crenshaw, & McCall, 2013).
What is Intersectionality?
Intersectionality is a structure for understanding how different social personalities connect to
make special encounters of persecution or honor (Crenshaw, 1989). The term was first
acquainted by Kimberlé Crenshaw with investigate the limits of hostile to segregation
regulations and feature how they frequently neglected to address the intensified effect of race and
orientation separation on black women. Crenshaw outlined this idea through the instance of
DeGraffenreid v. General Engines (1976), where People of color offended parties couldn't
guarantee segregation as a particular gathering. The court excused their case by regarding race
and orientation as independent, totally unrelated classes of examination, in this manner
eradicating their special encounters as People of color (Crenshaw, 1989). Crenshaw contended
that this single-axis structure disregarded the intricacies of personality, building up fundamental
underestimation for those at the crossing points of numerous social classifications.
Over time, the concept of intersectionality has evolved beyond its initial legal focus. It has
become a cornerstone of feminist and critical race theory, providing a lens to examine how
systems of power and oppression—such as patriarchy, racism, classism, ableism, and
heteronormativity—intersect to shape the lived experiences of individuals and groups (Collins,
1990; Davis, 2008). Intersectionality has also expanded to include diverse identities like
sexuality, disability, religion, and immigration status, emphasizing that oppression is not additive
but rather relational and context-specific (McCall, 2005). This framework challenges the
universality of traditional social justice approaches, advocating for more inclusive and nuanced
policies that account for the diversity of human experiences (Crenshaw, 1991).
By focusing the voices and encounters of the people who have generally been underestimated,
intersectionality moves the concentration from prevailing stories to a more impartial
comprehension of underlying disparities (Collins, 1990). It gives basic understanding into how
power works across various tomahawks of personality and provokes us to move past
oversimplified "either/or" structures, embracing a more extensive and foundational way to deal
with equity and consideration (Crenshaw, 1991; McCall, 2005).
This shift in perspective is akin to adjusting the lens through which we view society, bringing
previously blurred or hidden experiences into sharper focus. By amplifying the voices of those
historically marginalised, intersectionality disrupts dominant narratives, much like turning up the
volume on overlooked frequencies to hear the full spectrum of human experience. This reframing
not only reveals the intricate ways power operates across multiple axes of identity but also
exposes how systems of oppression interlock and reinforce one another. For instance, the
experiences of a Black woman cannot be fully understood by examining racism and sexism
separately; instead, her reality is shaped by the unique convergence of both. In this way,
intersectionality challenges binary, “either/or” thinking, encouraging a more nuanced view where
individuals can simultaneously hold privilege and experience marginalisation depending on
context.
Theoretical Development of Intersectionality
Key Theoretical Authors and Approaches
Kimberlé Crenshaw: Crenshaw's basic commitment to intersectionality is certain, as her
investigate of single-pivot systems stays a foundation of contemporary women's activist and
hostile to bigoted idea. Be that as it may, Crenshaw's dependence on lawful cases, like
DeGraffenreid v. General Engines, while strong, can be studied for being relevantly bound. Her
models, however illustrative, were principally arranged inside the U.S. overall set of laws,
bringing up issues about the worldwide relevance of her system. Could intersectionality at any
point really catch the subtleties of persecution in non-Western settings where legitimate designs
vary fundamentally, or does it risk being compelled by its starting point in Western law? While
Crenshaw's structure is significant, its emphasis on character governmental issues could likewise
miss the mark concerning tending to more extensive fundamental disparities, for example,
financial globalization or environment equity, that rise above personality classes.
Patricia Hills Collins: Collins' idea of the "network of control" is notable in its acknowledgment
of the interconnectedness of force frameworks. In any case, while her work succeeds at
distinguishing how numerous tomahawks of mistreatment associate inside institutional designs,
it can at times obscure the lines between individual organization and fundamental limitation. For
example, her accentuation on focusing black womens’ voices, while vital and engaging, could be
investigated for accidentally essentializing those voices. Not all People of color experience
persecution similarly, and there is a gamble of making a solid story that disregards intragroup
contrasts, like class or geographic area. Collins' structure would profit from more unequivocal
commitment with how intersectionality works at the miniature degree of individual experience,
close by the large scale level frameworks of control she so masterfully evaluates.
Kathy Davis and Leslie McCall: Davis' contention that interconnection blossoms with its open-
endedness and versatility is convincing, yet it raises a pivotal strain: how might a hypothesis
keep up with scholarly meticulousness while remaining so flexible that it gambles with
becoming everything to everybody? Intersectionality prominence in scholar and extremist circles
has prompted its abuse as a "popular expression," frequently deprived of its basic edge and
utilized as a catch-for any conversation of variety. Additionally, McCall's strategic commitments,
especially her intercategorical approach, are significant in progressing exact exploration.
Nonetheless, by outlining intersectionality as an instrument to look at and measure characters,
there is a risk of diminishing its extreme potential to a simple scientific strategy. This dangers
failing to focus on its groundbreaking point: to destroy frameworks of mistreatment, not just
guide them.
Critical Race Theory (CRT): As a central impact on intersectionality, CRT gives basic
experiences into foundational prejudice and institutional predisposition. In any case, CRT's much
of the time unique and hypothetical nature can make it difficult to reach to those external
scholarly community. Intersectionality acquires this test, as its dependence on CRT's applied
system at times estranges experts and policymakers who need noteworthy procedures for
executing diverse methodologies in genuine settings. Moreover, Additionally, CRT’s focus on
race, while vital, can overshadow other dimensions of intersectionality, such as class and
disability, potentially narrowing its scope.
The Evolution of Intersectionality
While intersectionality’s expansion development past race and orientation is a demonstration of
its adaptability, this advancement raises basic worries. The system's developing inclusivity —
incorporating station, indigeneity, handicap, and that's only the tip of the iceberg — gambles
weakening its concentration. By endeavoring to address too many converging persecutions,
interconnection runs the risk of turning out to be excessively expansive and hypothetically
awkward. For instance, Deliovsky and Kitossa (2013) in their work, noted that by applying
intersectionality to station frameworks in South Asia or native privileges in the Americas
requires a profound comprehension of the particular verifiable and social settings of these
locales. Without this, there is a gamble of forcing a Western-driven structure that deficiently
catches the special elements of force and mistreatment in non-Western settings (Deliovsky and
Kitossa, 2013).
In addition, while postmodern and postcolonial viewpoints have improved intersectionality by
underscoring the ease of personalities and scrutinizing essentialism, they likewise present
difficulties. By taking apart classifications, for example, Moshin (2021) noted that "Woman" or
"Black," postmodern scholars risk subverting the political fortitude that interconnection tries to
cultivate. How can aggregate activity happen when the classes around which individuals put
together are persistently addressed and weakened? There is a delicate balance between rejecting
essentialism and maintaining enough stability in categories to enable meaningful resistance
Moshin (2021).
Strengths of Intersectionality
Challenging Traditional EDI Practices
O’Donovan (2019) underscored that Interconnection uncovered the crucial deficiencies of single-
pivot ways to deal with Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) by showing how covering
characters compound underestimation. Conventional EDI systems frequently centre around
segregated classes, for example, race or gender, neglecting to catch the nuanced real factors of
people who experience separation at different convergences (O’Donovan, 2019).
Case Study: The Gender Pay Gap
A frequently cited example is the gender pay hole, which is commonly dissected through a
solitary pivot focal point that looks at people's profit. Nonetheless, an interconnected
methodology uncovers that race, identity, and different factors fundamentally convolute this
difference. For example, in the US, while white ladies acquire roughly 79 pennies for each dollar
procured by white men, People of colour procure just 64 pennies, and Latinas procure just 54
pennies (U.S. Congress, 1964). These figures show that zeroing in exclusively on orientation
neglects to address how foundational bigotry crosses with sexism to make intensified
imbalances. By applying diverse examination, associations and policymakers can more readily
comprehend and address these incongruities. For instance, designated wage value drives that
consider both race and orientation have been presented in some U.S. states to battle these layered
types of imbalance.
Case Study: Maternal Health Outcomes
Another convincing model is the maternal wellbeing outcomes. Universally, maternal death rates
lopsidedly affect women of colour, especially black women. In the US, Black women are three to
multiple times bound to die from pregnancy-related complexities than white ladies, in any event,
while controlling for money and schooling levels (Chang et al, 2003). This difference comes
from the convergence of fundamental bigotry, sexism, and understood predispositions inside
medical services frameworks. Creanga et al (2015) noted that Intersectionality has roused
promotion missions and general wellbeing drives to address these differences, for example, the
Dark Maternal Wellbeing Assembly in the U.S., which looks to battle racial disparities in
maternal consideration through official activity.
Practical Applications
Intersectional systems have likewise been embraced in worldwide strategy making, with drives
like the United Nations’ "Leave No One Behind" plan, which underscores inclusivity in
accomplishing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (McEntee- Atalianis, 2018). This
plan perceives that people with converging weaknesses —, for example, ladies in struggle zones,
debilitated individuals in non-industrial nations, or native networks confronting environmental
change — require customized methodologies to guarantee value. For instance, multifaceted
examination has informed programs pointed toward enabling ladies in provincial networks,
joining orientation value objectives with endeavors to battle neediness and natural debasement
(McEntee- Atalianis, 2018).
Empowerment and Visibility
Intersectionality challenges frameworks of abuse as well as enhances the voices of those
frequently delivered undetectable in standard talk. By focusing the encounters of underestimated
gatherings, it guarantees that their accounts and battles are recognized and tended to in
significant ways.
Case Study: Transgender Individuals of Color
An especially pressing utilization of intersectionality is its emphasis on the segregation looked
by transsexual people of variety. This gathering encounters remarkable types of abuse at the
convergence of transphobia and bigotry. For instance, in the US, Dark transsexual ladies face
lopsidedly high paces of brutality and crime contrasted with different gatherings. Backing
associations, for example, the Transsexual Regulation Place have utilized interconnected
structures to feature these real factors, pushing for comprehensive enemy of separation
regulations and further developed admittance to medical care and lodging.
Case Study: Black Lives Matter and LGBTQ+ Rights
Interconnection likewise cultivates coalitional legislative issues by empowering fortitude across
different social developments. The Black Live Matter (BLM) development, for instance,
Thurston (2018) underscored that it expressly coordinates a multifaceted focal point by tending
to the encounters of black women, eccentric people, and transsexual individuals inside its more
extensive battle against foundational prejudice and police fierceness. Likewise, LGBTQ+
associations, for example, Lambda Legitimate have consolidated intersectionality to feature the
intensified segregation looked by LGBTQ+ ethnic minorities, guaranteeing their battles are not
eradicated in that frame of mind about eccentric privileges. These coalitional endeavors exhibit
the groundbreaking force of intersectionality in joining unique gatherings under a common
obligation to equity.
Practical Applications
Intersectionality has impacted the improvement of comprehensive arrangements in work
environments and instructive organizations. For example, a few organizations currently carry out
"value reviews" to distinguish and address meeting types of segregation inside their hierarchical
designs. Colleges have embraced comparative methodologies, guaranteeing that drives pointed
toward expanding variety likewise consider interconnected factors, for example, the interesting
hindrances looked by original understudies of variety or crippled LGBTQ+
Critiques of Intersectionality
Theoretical and Practical Limitations
While intersectionality has been praised for its extraordinary potential, it isn't without its
faultfinders. The system's assets — its flexibility and inclusivity — can likewise be seen as
wellsprings of critical restrictions.
Equivocalness and Unclearness
Pundits, for example, Kathy Davis, contend that intersectionality's wide materialness subverts its
hypothetical accuracy. The exceptionally quality that makes it engaging across disciplines and
settings — its open-endedness — additionally makes difficulties in characterizing its degree and
limits. Intersectionality frequently chances becoming "everything to everybody," prompting a
weakening of its basic edge. For instance, while the system is much of the time summoned in
conversations about race, orientation, and class, its absence of a brought together procedure
implies that its application can change fiercely, making it hard to quantify its viability or reach
predictable determinations. This uncertainty represents a critical obstacle for specialists and
professionals trying to operationalize intersectionality in a thorough and methodical manner.
Chance of Over-Discontinuity
One of the most tireless evaluates of intersectionality is the gamble of over-discontinuity. By
including a consistently extending exhibit of characters — like race, orientation, class, sexuality,
capacity, age, and religion — the system risks becoming inconvenient and excessively intricate.
Researchers like Leslie McCall have advised against this "multiplication of contrasts,"
contending that it can prompt scientific loss of motion. At the point when an excessive number
of tomahawks of personality are thought about at the same time, it becomes challenging to
recognize noteworthy bits of knowledge or foster strong strategy proposals. This scrutinize
brings up the issue of whether intersectionality can stay a down to earth instrument for tending to
imbalances or whether it gambles regressing into a theoretical scholarly activity.
Inadequate Underlying Examination
A few researchers, like Jasbir Puar, fight that interconnection's emphasis on individual
encounters frequently comes to the detriment of dissecting more extensive fundamental power
elements. While the system succeeds at featuring how explicit characters meet to make one of a
kind types of persecution, it can at times neglect to address the primary powers — like free
enterprise, government, and expansionism — that shape these personalities and sustain
imbalance. For example, in zeroing in on how race and orientation converge to burden people,
intersectionality might disregard how worldwide frameworks of financial double-dealing fuel
these differences on a large scale. Puar's investigate proposes that intersectionality could profit
from a more profound commitment with primary and realist hypotheses to try not to be
excessively individualistic.
Scrutinize of Intersectionality Practically speaking
Execution Difficulties
Making an interpretation of intersectionality from hypothesis into training has shown to be a
significant test, especially in hierarchical and strategy settings. Numerous establishments and
associations battle to operationalize interconnected structures because of their inborn intricacy.
For instance, while the significance of tending to numerous tomahawks of imbalance is broadly
recognized, viable execution frequently flounders since associations miss the mark on devices,
aptitude, or assets to examine and address meeting personalities exhaustively. Variety and
consideration drives might conjure intersectionality logically however neglect to address its
center standards in a significant manner. For example, a working environment variety program
could zero in on expanding portrayal among ladies yet neglect to consider how race, class, or
handicap shapes admittance to these valuable open doors.
Co-optation and Depoliticization
One more critical study is the co-optation of intersectionality in corporate and scholastic settings,
where it is frequently decreased to a "trendy expression" without its extremist political roots. In
these unique circumstances, intersectionality is regularly utilized as a performative motion to
flag inclusivity without rolling out meaningful improvements to dug in frameworks of disparity.
For instance, companies might take on intersectionality in showcasing efforts or corporate social
obligation drives while proceeding with shady work rehearses that excessively hurt
underestimated networks. Also, colleges might remember interconnection for their educational
plans or variety explanations without tending to fundamental disparities inside their own
foundations, for example, biased recruiting practices or pay holes among staff.
Weakening of Extremist Potential
Intersectionality broad fame has additionally prompted worries about its depoliticization.
Initially imagined as a device for civil rights activism, intersectionality has, at times, been
deprived of its extreme investigate of foundational persecution. Rather than testing power
structures, it is in many cases utilized in a more shallow way to celebrate variety without tending
to the underlying drivers of imbalance. For instance, intersectionality is in some cases co-picked
into neoliberal systems that accentuate individual strengthening over aggregate activity. This
shift gambles sabotaging the extraordinary capability of interconnection, decreasing it to an
instrument for overseeing variety instead of destroying persecution.
My Critique
While these scrutinizes are legitimate and feature key constraints, it is fundamental to perceive
that they don't sabotage the principal significance of intersectionality as a hypothetical structure.
All things being equal, they highlight regions where intersectionality should advance to keep up
with its significance and basic edge. The structure should work out some kind of harmony among
inclusivity and explicitness, guaranteeing that it stays both far reaching and significant.
Furthermore, more prominent consideration should be paid to incorporating intersectionality
with primary investigations, stressing the exchange between individual encounters and
fundamental powers.
To forestall its depoliticization, intersectionality should remain grounded in its unique reason: to
challenge and destroy frameworks of mistreatment. This requires a guarantee to moving past
superficial applications and drawing in with the intricacies of force in significant and
extraordinary ways. Eventually, while intersectionality isn't without its defects, its capability to
propel value and equity far offsets its constraints, given that it keeps on being basically drawn in
and mindfully applied.
Conclusion
Interconnection has certainly reshaped the talk on civil rights, giving a focal point through which
the complicated, covering nature of persecution can be perceived and tended to. By testing
single-pivot ways to deal with imbalance, it has enlightened the manners by which minimized
characters connect to make one of a kind types of burden. Its groundbreaking effect on women's
activist hypothesis, basic race studies, and civil rights activism couldn't possibly be more
significant. Nonetheless, while intersectionality's commitments are significant, its hypothetical
and reasonable restrictions feature the requirement for persistent basic commitment.
One of the structure's most prominent assets is its flexibility and open-endedness, permitting it to
be applied across assorted settings and disciplines. In any case, this equivalent transparency has
prompted worries about its weakening, as its broad reception in scholarly community,
policymaking, and corporate settings frequently strips it of its extreme goal. Intersectionality is
in danger of being decreased to a logical gadget or a tokenistic signal as opposed to a device for
meaningful primary change. This is especially obvious in spaces where intersectionality is
conjured without an unmistakable comprehension of its standards, bringing about shallow variety
drives that neglect to address fundamental power irregular characteristics.
Moreover, intersectionality accentuation on characters and individual encounters, while basic,
some of the time comes to the detriment of tending to more extensive underlying powers.
Without an unequivocal spotlight on frameworks like private enterprise, expansionism, and
neoliberalism, intersectionality gambles with turning out to be excessively centered around
miniature level examinations, possibly restricting its utility in handling the main drivers of
disparity. Future applications should coordinate intersectionality with primary and realist
speculations to make a more exhaustive system for breaking down power and mistreatment.
In spite of these difficulties, intersectionality stays a fundamental device for propelling value and
equity. Its capacity to enhance underestimated voices and cultivate coalitional legislative issues
across assorted social developments makes it extraordinarily situated to address the intricacies of
current abuse. To guarantee its proceeded with pertinence, researchers and professionals should
stay watchful against its co-optation and depoliticization, attempting to protect its extreme
evaluate of foundational disparity.
Future bearings for intersectionality ought to zero in on finding some kind of harmony between
hypothetical thoroughness and commonsense materialness. Policymakers and associations
should foster devices and procedures that make an interpretation of the structure's experiences
into significant methodologies for change. Simultaneously, scholarly and dissident networks
should keep on pushing the limits of intersectionality, drawing in with its restrictions and
refining destroying frameworks of domination potential.
All in all, while intersectionality isn't without its defects, its groundbreaking power lies in its
capacity to challenge reductive understandings of mistreatment and motivate new ways to deal
with civil rights. By staying resolved to its extreme roots and fundamentally captivating with its
constraints, intersectionality can keep on filling in as a crucial system for tending to the complex
idea of imbalance in the 21st 100 years.
References
Bowleg, L. (2012) 'The problem with the phrase "women and minorities": intersectionality, an
important theoretical framework for public health', American Journal of Public Health, vol. 102,
no. 7, pp. 1267-1273.
Chang, J., Elam-Evans, L.D., Berg, C.J., Herndon, J., Flowers, L., Seed, K.A. and Syverson,
C.J., (2003). Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance—United States, 1991–1999. MMWR
Surveill Summ, 52(2), pp.1-8.]
Chime, R. (1992) 'The Civil Rights Act of 1964', Journal of Black Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp.
157-173.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., and McCall, L. (2013) 'Toward a field of intersectionality studies:
theory, applications, and praxis', Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 38, no. 4,
pp. 785-810.
Collins, P. H. (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of
Empowerment. Routledge.
Collins, P. H. (2000) 'Gender, black nationalism, and the American dream', Feminist Theory, vol.
1, no. 1, pp. 5-34.
Creanga, A.A., Berg, C.J., Syverson, C., Seed, K., Bruce, F.C. and Callaghan, W.M., (2015).
Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2006–2010. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 125(1),
pp.5-12.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989) 'Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist
critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics', University of
Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1989, no. 1, pp. 139-167.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991) 'Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence
against women of color', Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241-1299.
Davis, K. (2008) 'Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what
makes a feminist theory successful', Feminist Theory, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 67-85.
Deliovsky, K. and Kitossa, T., (2013). Beyond Black and White: When going beyond may take
us out of bounds. Journal of Black Studies, 44(2), pp.158-181.
European Commission (2020) European Union's Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025. European
Commission.
Fredman, S. (2011) 'The future of equality law', Industrial Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 345-
364.
Government Equalities Office (2010) Equality Act 2010: Guidance. Government Equalities
Office.
Hepple, B. (2010) 'The Equality Act 2010: a new framework for equality law', Industrial Law
Journal, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 345-364.
McAdam, D. (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970.
University of Chicago Press.
McCall, L. (2005) 'The complexity of intersectionality', Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and
Society, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1771-1800.
McEntee-Atalianis, L.J., (2018). “Leave no one behind” Linguistic and digital barriers to the
dissemination and implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development
Goals. Language Problems and Language Planning, 41(3), pp.217-244.
Mohsin Alwan, R., (2021). Oppressed female protagonists and their survival strategies: An
ecofeminist perspective in Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye and Alice Walker’s The Color
Purple (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia).
O’Donovan, D. (2019) ‘Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace’, Management and Industrial
Engineering, pp. 73–108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66864-2_4.
Republic of South Africa (1998) Employment Equity Act, 1998. Republic of South Africa.
Thurston, C.N., (2018). Black Lives Matter, American political development, and the politics of
visibility. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(1), pp.162-170.
U.S. Congress (1964) Civil Rights Act of 1964. U.S. Congress.
