mmasin Medical Researeh + ‘The balance netwoen patient suletyand medical advancement + Informed consent ys desperation f terminally patients + bong-term benefits o cocety¥s. short-term sks to individuals Questions for Discussion 2. Should Dr. Jolin continue the trial, knowing that i may cause harm to some Patients bu potentially save others? 2. What role should the patient's dasperation play in deciding whether to proceed with the drugtria? fow shoul the ethical principe of “dono harm" be weighed against the potential lifesaving benefits ofthe drug? ANS: () Or Tehn face» a tough devicien while the deg could save Lives, the rick of huem 4e seme prbients is signiflant The ethicat principle ode ret homme suggests cavtier, but the potertiod long-term benefits te Society aloe need consideration - Or-Tehn shevld weigh the pelentiat for haem Against the Tikelyheed ef a positive eveeme ond ideally ensure mere exten- ~Sive feeling ee medify the 4rial te minimize isk’ hefeee centinving- Aas(i) & Pabienls deperatien sheuld inform but ne the decisien- Trfeemed consent is key and decesion must pristine safely & sciatific evidence ever” emetienall appeals Page of 10 DR. TRUPTI PATILThe’ principle of “de net harm 8 crucial , bot jhe pelentiad by saving benefits shevld oloe be Coocidened » Or Iehn sheuld peieriline pobiert safely bot the urgency f finding o cure foc 0. bife ing with coreful Trentening iWinens could justify preceedi moritering and addilienol precautioncy vs. Public Safety in Technology nny develops a popular messaging app that is encrypled, ensuring, users! vacy. Law enforcement agencies annrnaeh the companys requesting access ro the apps peed dots to investigate suspected criminal activity, including. terrorism, The st decide whether tn create 4 backdoor rmment access, which could help prevent crlines but mi lead to misuse of data and weaken ser trust. Key Ethical Issues: + Privacy rights vs, public safety * Corporate responsibility to users vs, responsibilty to society "1 for government abuse vs, potential te prevent harm Questions for Diseussion: 1. Should the tech company prioritize user privacy or cooperate with law enforcement to ensure publicsafety? 2 Could granting access to the data set a dangorous precedent for future abuses of privacy? 3. What safeguards, if any, could be put in place to balance the company’s ethical responsibilities to both users and society? The Company Sheold prietige user privacy w it is a indamental. “sight - Vewever in exteptial cm hee public safely is ab disk (eq: terrerism) ce-eperatien with law erfercertent might be justified - This sheull be dene with choict eversight ensuring that dala acceas is limited transpasent ond erly vaed for the specific cose ot hand - Page 6 of 10 DR. TRUPTI PATILt granting access could crete o dangerous precedant £ fer Flare government pelemially leading 42 caewi alien: Bee j HA cecld ered coer tout in the company ond set the ™ § Stage fer mere dala sequits in the feture increoe é ming the sisk q privacy viclationss ond bine = as £ Safeguard shecld inclods & z © feces te data shedd be granted enly in high-visk well-defined situatiens bedy cevld eversee Ye ensure. Timted Aa. A ahied - part and sieview dad requests they are Prepertisnall - « Tranepasiency The cempany shevld publidy Ayeeee nine Sequst ond the umber 4 James crccess bars grime Jo. maintein uber tnust eTridependent oversight £ been Page 7 of 10 DR. TRUPTI PATILtie for plagiarism, even though it could severely impact student 2 second chance without punishment, or does -ademic Integrity? should Sarah balance her duty to uphold academic standards with sion forthe students situation? ans Yoo, sarah gape! the phymisr aie academic integrity and. foienens te ether shudent despite the petentiall cencequence ef fenean caseer As & A second chorce cold be ethical fer a ‘inst -time efFense with cendiliens dike aedsing the werk greperly - Hewerer sepealed e(feree chevld be petteliged to airlein imtegeity ; Page 8 of 10 DR. TRUPTI PATIL, ‘ ‘uth ond oe ienpertance A * mys v Geeclly Sarah schevld of Suppect ume emphasiging he | Trdhanced appreoch intervention of Fenieg academic Wenety: A sewelve Voaying ow educationalsts by using see its prosuction 6 auions, so i not legally the CEO Is under pressure from hoard members argue that the company has ans reducing nual impact, even ifiE me: a fon vs. environment responsibility ONS Vs. ethical obligations Bt environmental sustainability vs. short-term financial gain Should the company prioritize prof, as demanded by shareholders, or focus on reducing its environmental impact? 2, Can the company justify its actions by adhering to local laws, even it they are lenient? 3. What ethical responsibility does the company have to the environment and future generations, even if the financial costs are high? ans: ()) The company ahold find a ‘dance prefit ond. belween envirermentoll geapensibili ubile share held may pier ize sheet tery pretits » The cempary ha» on alhcat cligaen 4s consider M's beng - term envirenmental — impact « Page 10 of 10 DR. TRUPTI PATIL t ‘a significant ethical geopensibility envieenment fer fotune “generation ~ cc es ve ih eu m crucial fee deng term Sustainability > concider the impact | it action wih fem fimancial goin agoinsle ils duty te the seciely- aida di.