0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views9 pages

Capacity Planning Methodology For Success

The Computer Measurement Group (CMG) is a non-profit organization focused on the measurement and management of computer systems, emphasizing performance evaluation and capacity management. This document discusses a capacity management methodology aimed at helping organizations establish effective planning functions, highlighting the importance of collaboration with various stakeholders. It also outlines the responsibilities of capacity planners and the necessity of accurate data gathering and forecasting for successful capacity management.

Uploaded by

kmdbasappa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views9 pages

Capacity Planning Methodology For Success

The Computer Measurement Group (CMG) is a non-profit organization focused on the measurement and management of computer systems, emphasizing performance evaluation and capacity management. This document discusses a capacity management methodology aimed at helping organizations establish effective planning functions, highlighting the importance of collaboration with various stakeholders. It also outlines the responsibilities of capacity planners and the necessity of accurate data gathering and forecasting for successful capacity management.

Uploaded by

kmdbasappa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

The Association of System

Performance Professionals

The Computer Measurement Group, commonly called CMG, is a not for profit, worldwide organization of data processing professionals committed to the
measurement and management of computer systems. CMG members are primarily concerned with performance evaluation of existing systems to maximize
performance (eg. response time, throughput, etc.) and with capacity management where planned enhancements to existing systems or the design of new
systems are evaluated to find the necessary resources required to provide adequate performance at a reasonable cost.

This paper was originally published in the Proceedings of the Computer Measurement Group’s 1987 International Conference.

For more information on CMG please visit [Link]

Copyright Notice and License

Copyright 1987 by The Computer Measurement Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Published by The Computer Measurement Group, Inc. (CMG), a non-profit
Illinois membership corporation. Permission to reprint in whole or in any part may be granted for educational and scientific purposes upon written application to
the Editor, CMG Headquarters, 151 Fries Mill Road, Suite 104, Turnersville , NJ 08012.

BY DOWNLOADING THIS PUBLICATION, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE READ, UNDERSTOOD AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE
FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

License: CMG hereby grants you a nonexclusive, nontransferable right to download this publication from the CMG Web site for personal use on a single
computer owned, leased or otherwise controlled by you. In the event that the computer becomes dysfunctional, such that you are unable to access the
publication, you may transfer the publication to another single computer, provided that it is removed from the computer from which it is transferred and its use
on the replacement computer otherwise complies with the terms of this Copyright Notice and License.

Concurrent use on two or more computers or on a network is not allowed.

Copyright: No part of this publication or electronic file may be reproduced or transmitted in any form to anyone else, including transmittal by e-mail, by file
transfer protocol (FTP), or by being made part of a network-accessible system, without the prior written permission of CMG. You may not merge, adapt,
translate, modify, rent, lease, sell, sublicense, assign or otherwise transfer the publication, or remove any proprietary notice or label appearing on the
publication.

Disclaimer; Limitation of Liability: The ideas and concepts set forth in this publication are solely those of the respective authors, and not of CMG, and CMG
does not endorse, approve, guarantee or otherwise certify any such ideas or concepts in any application or usage. CMG assumes no responsibility or liability
in connection with the use or misuse of the publication or electronic file. CMG makes no warranty or representation that the electronic file will be free from
errors, viruses, worms or other elements or codes that manifest contaminating or destructive properties, and it expressly disclaims liability arising from such
errors, elements or codes.

General: CMG reserves the right to terminate this Agreement immediately upon discovery of violation of any of its terms.
Learn the basics and latest aspects of IT Service Management at CMG's Annual Conference - [Link]/conference
A CAPACITY PLANNING METHODOLOGY THAT IS DESTINED TO SUCCEED

Ruu-Tian Lawrence
First Bank System Information Services, lnc.

ABSTRACT

Buy the Latest Conference Proceedings and Find Latest Computer Performance Management 'How To' for All Platforms at [Link]
This paper was written to share with you how you can successfully establish capacity management function
in your organization. The key issues this paper address are:

• A capacity management methodology that is destined to succeed.

The organizational savvy that planners necd to be effective.


Join over 14,000 peers - subscribe to free CMG publication, MeasureIT(tm), at [Link]/subscribe

To end the paper I wil' show you a recent quarterly capacity plan I developed. Please feel free to adopt
ideas that are of value to you. I hope you will enjoy the success that I have enjoyed.
absolutely essential for planners to accomplish all
1. INTRODUCTION four tasks to ffi6Ke his methodology effective.

This paper was written with the intent of sharing my 2.1 TALKING TO THE RIGHT PEOPLE
experience as a Capacity Planner in two St. Paul
organizations over the past four and one-half years. Good forecasters use good indicators. They search for
I can proudly say that in both situations the capacity strong indicator';. They normally have a good under-
management methodology was implemented with great stand i ng of where they can find good i nf ormati on to
success. base thei r forecilsts on. Good planners need to do the
same thing. We planners are forecasters. We need to
However. success was not obtained without pain. The know where to get accurate and reliable infonmation so
pain I experienced came While learning two valuable efforts spent gathering and validating data can be
lessons. One lesson concerned capacity management minimized.
methodology. The other concerned technical knowledge
and organization savvy that planners need to be I have relied on three primary sources. The first
effective. Both lessons can help you to successfully source is the sy~,tems development staff. These
establish the capacity management function in your managers. analysts. and progranrners are normally the
organization as well. first line interface with users. Because of their
combined knowledge of both business and technology.
It has been a decade since the capacity management they can greatly help in assessing the impact of new
concept was conceived and its importance generally or enhanced computer systems.
recognized. We capacity planners have come a long
way. Nowadays capacity management is a very common The second source I rely on heaVily is corporate
and prevalent discipline which can be found in most planners and marketing staff. They normally possess a
medium and large data centers. This fact is wealth of knowledge of business seasonality. trends.
illustrated by the rapid growth of attendance in customer behavior. product promotions, etc. With
annual Computer Measurement Group national con- their assistance we often can identify and explain
ferences. The capacity management function has patterned usage variations. At times we can even
transformed from an art form to more of a scientific explain odd, unique, and non-recurring behavior.
discipline.
To give you an example: during 1985 for a period of
There are numerous software packages on the market one month, Automatic TellE!r Machine (ATM) transaction
today which claim to help capacity planners do a volume increased by 40%. I was pUZZled by that fact.
convincing job in planning future computing require- After talking with one of the marketers I realized a
ments for their organizations. All these scientific. campaign had been started to encourage customers to
user-friendly, and expensive tools can help planners use Instant Cash :ards by randomly offering cash
to increase the precision of their forecasts if they prizes. This promotion resulted in a 40% increase in
are used appropriately. Higher precision may ulti- ATM transactions <:>n the mainframe. Luckily the main-
mately bolster planners ' credibility. Yet we planners frame was not satJrated and there was no negative
often place too much emphasis on the tools we need impact on the senice level. However. Had I known in
before the capacity management function has been advance of this upcoming promotion, I would have been
soundly established. We fail to recognize that a better prepared to deal with its impact--especially if
sound capacity management methodology is what provides the mainframe had been close to saturation.
the foundation that a planner needs to succeed during
the start-up phase. Attempting to use an expensive The last source of information usually comes from
analytical model without this basic foundation will diligently readin!l internal conrnunications and
result in high capital investment with low return. In following market changes and business related issues,
fact. a good planner can initially establish the such as bills to he decided during legislative
capacity management function with great success with- sessions. etc. Wf' planners need to follolJ clol;;ely all
out any analytical models. the issues which may affect the way our organization
does business.
2. LESSON ONE: THE METHOOOLOGY
In the banking inclustry for example, state reciprocal
A sound capacity planning methodology is no more than banking law allow~ banks to acquire banks in other
talking to the right people. placing accountabilities states that have corresponding reciprocal agreements.
where they belong, forecasting frequently, and taking In 1986 when the law passed in Minnesota, my organiza-
full responsibility for the recommendations. It is tion was suddenly in the position of being able to

- 496 -

Find a CMG regional meeting near you at [Link]/regions


Learn the basics and latest aspects of IT Service Management at CMG's Annual Conference - [Link]/conference
acquire a number of other banks. This could have sufficient capacity exists to support new systems lies
instantly required increased computing resource fully with the sy:.tem developers who have promised a
requirements of many times our current capacity. particular level of support to users. It is therefore
imperative that the system development staff be
2.2 ACCOUNTABILITY accountable for pl~oviding projected requirements in a
timely manner.
Capacity planners should not be the only ones
responsible for the capacity plan. In order to explain To carry this log'ic one step further. the organilation
probably should also hold the marketers and corporate

Buy the Latest Conference Proceedings and Find Latest Computer Performance Management 'How To' for All Platforms at [Link]
why. I will start by looking at the objectives of
capacity management and the planning process itself. planners accountable for providing information to
capacity management staff and for working with them to
The objective of capacity planning is to assure derive accurate predictions. However, in reality this
adequate computing resources to meet future demands in theory may not work. These groups are usually managed
a cost-effective way. The ultimate goal is to maintain by a different dbision head whose responsibility is
the level of service which is agreed on or acceptable primarily outward focused. Their data processing
to the users. Service level objectives consist of expertise is often low. They normally do not share the
availability, responsiveness, and reliability. Provid- same concern for data processing service levels.
Join over 14,000 peers - subscribe to free CMG publication, MeasureIT(tm), at [Link]/subscribe

ing high quality and stable service in essence may


increase employee productivity and maintain a good Therefore, holdinq them accountable for providing input
customer image. Since the impact of capacity manage- to the planning process may be impractical. There are
ment is corporate wide. to achieve its goal in essence other ways of obt,~ining this information which will be
is to achieve a corporate goal. Consequently, all discussed in lesscm Two: Technical Knowledge and
employees need to share this responsibility. Organizational Sa~vy.
The planning process itself consists of four major Capacity planners are responsible for developing the
components. They are data gathering. data analysis. p1ann i ng methode 1<>gy . We are likewi se respons ib 1e for
model validation, and feedback. tt is a closed-loop, marketing the met10dology to management. We are
continuous process. responsible for cJnvincing management that accounta-
bility in the pro:ess needs to be adequately placed.
+----------------+ Capacity planners also need to assist our planning
+--------+ Data Gathering +----------+ partners to better understand their current workload.
I +----------------+ I By furnishing them with information on historical
I I trends and resource consumptions for the systems under
+----------+ +---------------+ their responsibility, we will enable them to polish
+ Feedback + + Data Analysis + their forecasting skills and make them better fore-
+----------+ +---_._-------~--+ casters. Competent planning partners. it goes without
I saying. give us a better thance to derive accurate
I +------------------+ I forecasts.
+-------+ Hodel Validation +---------+
+ -----------------+ By holding the system development staff accountable for
input infonmation. we already have them agreeing with
We all know the acronym 'GIGO ' which means Garbage In the planning assumptions. By helping our planning
Garbage Out. Accurate input infonmation is critical to partners to forecast better and by truly developing a
the reliability of the outcome. partnership in the planning process, we planners will
have allied ourselves with them all. When the final
Capacity planners. generally speaking. are not plan is presented, the capacity planners can assume
chartered to work with users directly on developing new there will be no one to challenge the validity of
systems or enhancing existing systems. Many times they assumptions.
are not kept current on all upcoming projects that may
affect resource requirements. However. they are The planning process is a joint venture. The more
chartered to plan and predict future resource require- planners that can assist, the better the result will
ments for the organization. lherefore planners must be. The key is to offer our assistance and to work
get periodic updates on upcoming workloads to make the with the system development staff and other planning
planning process complete. partners to create a win~in situation.
As I indicated previously there are three sources from 2.3 FREQUENT FORECASTS
which 1 obtain information on upcoming workloads. They
are the system development staff. marketers and Good forecasters forecast often. Where 1 worked. a
corporate planners. and my own tracking of important quarterly planning cycle was adequate when supplemented
business issues. In my organization, the system by monthly comparison of actual versus forecast. A
development staff provides by far the most information short planning c~cle preclUdes us from being too far
on medium term (six to eighteen months) resource wrong. Periodic validating of our assumptions and
requirements. predictions is extremely important due to the fact that
plans and priorities inevitably change with time. When
The systems development staff interface with users changes take place it is natural that predictions as a
directly to define data processing needs and suggest result should change accordingly.
ways to satisfy the needs. They most likely maintain
and support some existing data processing applications However, when changes occur, it is critical for
for the USers as well. They are close to their users planners to be atle to explain the difference between
and they best understand users needs.
l
actual and prediction. All managers know that it is
important either to operate within budget or be able to
Frequently capacity planners need to actually beg for explain the variences. The same rule applies to
information on potential upcoming projects in order to planners. We neE'd to either be accurate in the fore-
forecast future resource requirements. This practice casts or be able to explain why the actual is different
requires unnecessary effort on the part of capacity
planners. The responsibility for ensuring that

- 497 •

Find a CMG regional meeting near you at [Link]/regions


Learn the basics and latest aspects of IT Service Management at CMG's Annual Conference - [Link]/conference
from forecast. This is the only way we planners can suaslvely and effectively. For example, graphical
establish our credibility. presentation should be considered due to its proven
effectiveness.
2.4 8E RESPONSI8LE
In short. a good planner needs to be a technician. a
Often I hear planners say. MMy management is not statistician, a communicator and a manager who is
conmitted." I challenge this type of statement. If capable of managing processes as well as people.
management is not committed. why would they have a

Buy the Latest Conference Proceedings and Find Latest Computer Performance Management 'How To' for All Platforms at [Link]
capacity planner on their payroll? I believe we 4. EXAMPLE: A RECENT CAPACITY PLAN
planners need to be responsible for the capacity
planning methodology. We need to market our ideas and I would like to end this paper by showing a recent
prove the value of our existence. We need to make Quarterly capaclty plan which I developed. The plan
ourselves understood by our management. We need to has four basic sections. They are assumptions. volume
focus on issues that our management is concerned projections. forecasts. and recommendations. Please
about. We need to present our cases in ways that feel free to adopt any ideas you feel would be
provide management all the information it needs to make valuable. However. try to be creative. Do develop a
Join over 14,000 peers - subscribe to free CMG publication, MeasureIT(tm), at [Link]/subscribe

decisions. We need to make management recognize our format that best suits your management's preferences.
contribution to the organization.
4.1 CAPACITY PLAN FIRST QUARTER 1987
In addition to our upward responsibility. we are FIRST 8ANK SYSTEM INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
responsible for working with people who provide us JANUARY 1987
information that feeds into the plan. We are respon-
sible for assisting them in forecasting better. More • The plan is developed to accommodate daily peak
importantly we are responsible for giving them feed- demand.
back. We need to convince them that the effort in
seeking better forecasts is for the benefit of the • 85% of utilization is used as processor (CPU)
organization. We need to convince them that. we are threshold. Higher usage may cause performance
there to help them look smart in their users' eyes. We degradation. therefore. decrease our ability to
are there to build a winning team. maintain the established service objectives.
3. LESSON TWO: TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE AND ORGANIZA- • Real storage ;tnd virtual storage are also [Link]
TIONAL SAVVY into consideration.
A good planner reQulres good people skills. CAPACITY PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS
Understanding bits and bytes is not enough. Unlike
performance analysts capacity planners have more
l RETAIL
exposure to the world at large. We cannot work in an
ivory tower alone and expect to be successful. • Lobby Automation
Implementation will continue. The Metro banks
For example. the problem I stated earlier about not will totally be implemented by July 1987. Five
being able to rely on outside departments for informa- region banks will be implemented by December 1987.
tion can be overcome by a planner's organizational
savvy. He can use informal influence to gather this Add Credit Scoring feature. Will test through
information from corporate planners and marketers. April 1987. Will implement in May 1987. May take
Such individuals often cannot express the details of in credit bUrl!aUS' credit rating in December 1981.
their service requirements in terms that are directly
usable in the planning process. By providing them with To allow Otts transaction be posted to CICS
historical trends of their application work volumes, d1rectly. Test through Aprl1 1987. Will
the planner can equip them with the knowledge they need implement in April 1987.
to quantify the impact of potential projects.
Large Currency Reporting system will be
Of course. a planner needs to be technically pro- implemented through February 1987. Will be in
ficient. He needs to understand operating systems. He full production in March 1987.
needs to be fully aware of the integration of all
applications. The level of application integration • CIS Expansion
often determines the portability of certain applica- Incorporated (;redit Card information in June
t ions from one rna i nf rame to another. In add iti on to 198T. Trust 1nformation in July 1987. Insurance
knowledge of operating systems. mainframes. and information in October 1987. Discount Brokerage
applications. the planner also needs to be trained in in October 1987. Mortgage in October 1987.
statistics. This knowledge will allow the planner to
better understand the data. It will also enable him to
better present the information. especially when the
• Fi rst Milwaukoe
Will convert all retail systems by March 1987.
confidence of projection is not high due to future
uncertainties. • Due From Reconciliation
Initial implementation includes Fed. Reserve
On top of all the above knowledge. the planner needs to accounts for FBMP and F8SP. Will implement online
draw all the information around him as input to the by March 1987. Accounts for other banks (ex:
planning process. He needs to have a very good under- Chase Manhattan) in June 19S7. Will include
standing of the business he is in. The understanding regions in July 198T.
of business equips him to better communicate with his
users. The planner also needs to be politically • l099 Window Tran
sensitive. He needs to understand the issues that 1099 window transaction volume peak at year end.
relate to the financial well being of his organiza-
t;on. Recommendations he makes should be technically
sound and make good business sense. Additionally he
needs to be able to present his recommendation per-

- 498 -
Find a CMG regional meeting near you at [Link]/regions
Learn the basics and latest aspects of IT Service Management at CMG's Annual Conference - [Link]/conference
1099 Year End Correction System ~loat Pricing System
• Possibly modify the existing Burroughs system to
Automate 1099 year-end-correction process by
January 19B7. provide SI mO'''e flexibility in controlling float
pricing. Expecting a decision by May 1987.
• Collection Management System Implementation in September 1987.
Will implement Credit Card by January 1987. In
production in February 1987. Routing System
Possibly repl.~ce the regional transmission (X300)
• IL and DOH Deconverslon with RJE jobs. The new system will handle the

Buy the Latest Conference Proceedings and Find Latest Computer Performance Management 'How To' for All Platforms at [Link]
IL and DOH will remain IOMS applications through- input as well as print-back capabilities. POD is
out December 1987. completed in January 1987. If approved. will test
through June 1987; and will implement in July 1987.
• First Mortgage
Sales Management System - Retail
Testing the RiSK Management module in the
Encompass system by May 19B7. Implement In June Will develop ,3 system to monitor and track retail
19B7. In production In July 19B7. sales in 1987. This is to support incentive com-
pensation pay for personal bankers. Will imple-
Join over 14,000 peers - subscribe to free CMG publication, MeasureIT(tm), at [Link]/subscribe

• Others (Impact NOT assessed) ment in Febru,lry 1987; and in production in March
1987.
Account Reconciliation System
Currently we are evaluating an ARS system from Sales Management System - Small Business
DISC corporation. Expecting to make a decision on Will develop a system to monitor and track small
software package by April 19B7. Testing by May business sales in second quarter 1987. Implemen-
1987, and implementation in June 1987. tation in third Quarter 1987; and in production in
third Quarter 1987. Mainly a batch system.
APEX System
Two alternatives are now being considered. They WHOLESALE
are IBM and Tandem softwares. Will complete soft-
ware recommendation by January 1987. Will com- • AIM System
plete hardware recofllllendation by March 1987. If 50 administration assistants are using online AIM
it is approved, then will test In third Quarter system. This usage will continue to grow. Will
1981; and be in production in fourth Quarter 1987. start CIS Monetary balances project in March
19B7. Will test through October 1987. Implement
Check Processing System in November 1987.
We are currently evaluating the whole check pro-
cessing system with SI. The result of the project Plan to modify the system to reduce online
mayor may not impact IBM mainframes. Regardless transactions. Test through June 1987. Implement
the result. we do not expect to see any implemen- In July 1987.
tation plan until the fourth Quarter 1987 at the
earliest. Will develop a product infonmation sub-system.
Will complete specification by January 1981. Test
Saving/CDls/Retirement System through May 1987. Implement first phase in June
A study will be conducted to detenmine what all 1987; and implement second phase in October 1987.
needs to be done to improve the savings, CO's, and This is mainly a batch system.
retirement systems.
• Trust System
Checking Plus Test the security movement package by December
Enhance to handle larger retail loans in second 1987. Will implement in 19BB.
quarter of 1987. This may enable the move of
retail loans from ClIl to Checking Plus systems. • Stock transfer
The system will leave us by March 1981_
CIF Files Consolidating/Marketing Analysis System
Develop a consolidated FBS customers' file. This • Due From Reccnciliation
will allow personal bankers easy accesses to a Develop a Due Rec system for Commercial loans.
complete customer business profile. Along with Complete POD by January 1987. Will test through
this effort. we are currently evaluating softwares ~arch 19B7; and will implement In April 19B7. It
which will facilitate cleaning and standardizing will be a batch system.
data elements process of CIF files. Providing
household1ng feature will be part of the project. • Others (Impact NOT Assessed)
We are developing the POD now. Will test consol-
idation in March 1987. Implement the consoli- AIM System
dation system in May 1987. Automatic clean-up by Enhance AIM ~ystem to be the wholesale CIS system.
July 1987. Manual clean-up will be part of the
routine process; and householding feature is AIM Jurdor Project
expected to be implemented in July 1987. Will eliminate the information stored in the
system for Small Business for Minneapolis and
Unistatements St. Paul. W~ll test in April 1987. lmplement in
Possibly add more types of accounts and more rela- June 19B1.
tionships to the system. For example: adding
credit card accounts to unistatements. This wi 11 Convnercial Loan II
be a batch system. Target to implement in the Automation of foreign exposure risk analysis may
thi rd quarter 1987. happen. If 0, will incorporate IBG. MIDAS
information nto eLlI database. In the second
phase. will ncorporate DDA, COls information into

- 499 -

Find a CMG regional meeting near you at [Link]/regions


Learn the basics and latest aspects of IT Service Management at CMG's Annual Conference - [Link]/conference
the ClII database. Expecting a go or no-go Issco Graphics
decision by March 19B7. Test through June 1987; FBSSI and Trust will pilot until December 1986.
and implementation in July 1987. They will be in production in January 1987. Have
approximatel~' six users in December 1986. Will
london Project have additional 24 Issco graphic users by December
This project Is currently on hold. 19B1.
SYSTEM • Others (Impa,t NOT Assessed)

Buy the Latest Conference Proceedings and Find Latest Computer Performance Management 'How To' for All Platforms at [Link]
Network Serv1 ces End User Computing
HCF facility will be installed in first quarter lssco Plan - This is a project management
19B7. This facility will allow FBS Mortgage facility. FE:SSI will be the initial user of this
system 36's to communicate with each other. HCF product. However, how the use of this product
along with reverse passthru will also allow HP proliferates is an unknown at this point of time.
devices to communicate with the IBM mainframes.
Office Auto~tion
Advanced Function Printing The possibility of implementing any office auto-
Join over 14,000 peers - subscribe to free CMG publication, MeasureIT(tm), at [Link]/subscribe

AFP is available for use. Complete implementation mation facility is unknown currently.
plan by January 1987. Will implement in IS by
March 1987. Implement production print throughout ONLINE TRANSACTION VOlUHE FORECASTS
1987. (Peak Hour Only)
System Software New Application Growth 12186 Addition by 12/87
Enhancements to system software are required to
improve availability, support new hardware or Lobby Automation 3.500 5.000
provide software for new and larger applications. AIF Expansion 5.200
Resources required for this support are included First Milwaukee 3,000
in the forecast. Collection 900 1.000
FBS Mortgage 750 100
• Others (Impact Not Assessed) Due From Reconciliation 100
Gil Regional 2.100 500
Implementation of Single System Image is not Gil Hetro 1,200 500
quantified. 1099 Correction 50
DIVESTITURE Existing Application Growth

• Sturgis An average of 3% annual growth is assessed in the


Deconversion is completed in December 1986. forecasts.

• Bremer Banks END USER COHPUTING AND OFFICE AUTOMATION


Deconversion is now in progress. Target to (Number of Users)*
complete by December 1987.
12/86 Addition by 12/87
Others
Status change from affiliate to Corr between Focus 60 110
August 1986 to July 1987. At this time. they will Issco Graphics 6 24
leave the HR, Payroll and GIL systems. Six months
after the status change they will leave FBS system * This indicates the number of users who have access
completely. to the systems. However, the real driver of the
usage is the number of logon (i.e .• active)
Mengedoth Banks - Status change in January 1988. users. In the analysis, we assume that one out of
Deconvert six months after the status change. every seven end users is active during the peak
hours.
ENTERPRISE 8USINESS
GRAPHS lAYOUTS
GIL Business line of Reporting
Full production in February 1987. Major components of the Graphs are:
Management Report/Funds Transfer Pricing • Baseline - The processor utilization consumed by
Develop funds transfer pricing module in October all existing workload which includes system and
1986. Eliminate existin9 management reporting applications ,:urrently.
system in January 1987.
Normally the declining baseline indicates the
• Others (Impact NOT Assessed) effect of div,~stitures of banks or applications.
Human Resources System • System - Forecasted growth introduced by addi-
The project is progressing slowly. No impact is tional system utilities or enhanced versions of
assessed on the IBM host in 1981. the existing 'iystem utilities.
OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY • CICS Growth - Forecasted growth introduced by the
new applications and the normal growth of the
End User Computing existing applications. However, new applications
Focus whose resource consumption are significant may be
Have approximately 60 focus users in December listed individually on the graphs.
198&. Will have another 110 focus userS by
December 1987.

• 500 .

Find a CMG regional meeting near you at [Link]/regions


Learn the basics and latest aspects of IT Service Management at CMG's Annual Conference - [Link]/conference
• Seasonality - Forecasted additional usage due to
the seasonal processing.
Significant Events - New applications whose Pruel':nor Ut iii uti Dn
3t9lnll'Ellerno Park
resource consumptions are of great significance J"nuar,. 1911
are shown individually on the graphs.
1::1 _

Buy the Latest Conference Proceedings and Find Latest Computer Performance Management 'How To' for All Platforms at [Link]
= E~::':;i;, J
~~Ie~ ~

~···. ""4
Illllr s,:tt..
PTOeuur Uti I izatien W 1. . . llllt
3191/?II-St. Pau.l
hnUllry. 1911

'00].
Join over 14,000 peers - subscribe to free CMG publication, MeasureIT(tm), at [Link]/subscribe

I'" '.1 ,III' "


".+---------- ,~~.~~--------- Jlpr Oct Apr

~ "j
.~

.
,•
u...t
II
J ~~~ml~~.W~t~~WI~~~I~!~~~~lfll\ll
m "'"
_
f1'••• thn
tIts Srwth
Sh..... llt,
-
E &5,.t..
i" rzJ .... 1111.
. ,1,,11.111111 ..
II RECOMMENDATIONS

• If we 1mplemE~nt new release of uce General ledger •


un Apr ]"111 Oct Uft .,,, two general ledger databases will merge in the
first Quarter- of 1981. The merge will move the
GIL database on the 3090/200 at St. Paul to the
30B1K at St. paul.

• Continue to "xplore the possibilities of imple-


menting CICS Single System Image. This would
allow users to access all three processors without
being burdened to logon and logoff from one
processor to the other.
The Single System Image needs to be implemented by
April 1981 e4ther partially or in full. To
alleviate capacity constraints in June 1981, we
need to position to move Corrmercial Loan II and
Internationa' Banking from 3090/200 to 30B1K in
st. Paul sitt~ and to move Personal Trust from
Pronuer UtilizatiDn 30B1K to 30901200 at St. Paul site.
lieu: - 5t. Paul
J"nu","", 1911
If Single System Image cannot be implemented by
1::i _ June 19B7. then upgrade the 30901200 to a 3090/400
at St. Paul !;ite should be considered as an
I"" alternative.
-70

-" mCICS

[Link] Utlliz"tiDn
ActUAl v,
Foncut
SYSTEM A OI9l/21U - St. P.u!
hnuAr, 1911

..
, .!
"" .
, .. •
~.
<
"
"• T1""T rT
_ hi
r r r·rr-t
~t 1"1
I I ,
_
, I I ,
~t
,
~t
1 , ,
IU'
I t 1
_
I t. .

• It_e_IIl!'' CI. II ..... 'r. . ""12" t. JIIU


••• ill Jr. Q... ~,.r. 1." l!il! ... t h h pl.<;~

- 501 •

Find a CMG regional meeting near you at [Link]/regions


Learn the basics and latest aspects of IT Service Management at CMG's Annual Conference - [Link]/conference
• Work
This is the disk space required to support
production and development work. Example: Sort
Procuur Utilization space, temporary work space, etc.
Actu«1 vt Forecut
SYSTEH B U'II1KJ - St. [Link]
tOO
[Link] 1981 • Free Space
This is the space that is available to meet future
II or unexpected demands.
00 -----------------------------------_.

Buy the Latest Conference Proceedings and Find Latest Computer Performance Management 'How To' for All Platforms at [Link]
• Recovery
" This is the space required to do recovery in case
of hardware malfunction.

• Expansion
This is the space required on each logical units
for potential file expansion and fragmentation.
Join over 14,000 peers - subscribe to free CMG publication, MeasureIT(tm), at [Link]/subscribe

Generally speaking, the expansion spaces are small


I y',TTI-r .,..,.-,-r " . " , - , j iii iii i I and fragmented. They can only be used to satisfy
1". _ hi ~t 1"1 ~ hi ~t t~ ~r
small demands. Disk management group always tries
_
• be_fl"'. a. JJ _ . fr. 3"""" t. Jt.u
in ]r" huh'. U" 11111 1I0t ta1lol O"ln
to minimize it. However, for planning purposes,
we will treat Expansion as used space.
COMMENTS
• We are currently using 2.S G1ga Bytes as the
threshold. This is equivalent to 4 33800 logical
units.
Prounor Ut i I ; ut I on
Actul.l VI Fortcut • The Expansion Factor is 8% of all the production,
SYSTEM C (]1I1/21t) - EnUII' Put development, and SOm€ system disk logical units.
t::L
00.
~~~~~_~~~ . • We are currently using 3.8 6iga Bytes for
recovery. This is equivalent to 2 3380D and 2
• ............... 3380E logical units .
:: ..
- : rt

; . ~ • The Charts du include all the 3350 disk drives


which are stn 1 in use. However, they wi 11 be
phased out ill February-March 1987 time frame.

~"L
This is the result of the replacement of IBM 3350
;: l' disk drives "/ith IBM 3380 disk drives project.
t 2'

"• -T rrT"r,.,.·~,rr, "T"'"O'T'"T",rr,"T'-r, ,


u" _, Jut Det 1.11 ..... ,.11 (ld nil Ilpr

•••

M5D DI5TRIIltJTION
P[CEt1~[Q, nih
IN GIGA8YTES
4.2 DASD PLAN FIRST QUARTER 1987
FIRST 8ANK SYSTEM INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. 'ft

e
JANUARY 1987
'"
GRAPHS LAYOUT UX. :
. . ~x
D
• Production tU
This 1s the disk space used by production systems ID
which are non-IDMS.
ST. PlU ENERGY PARK

--
Production-Database
This is the disk space used by IOMS production mJ~ rZJ~" m.......- mI~~-


systems.

Deve 1opment
IEP- J ••

Q9-••••
-
,... S.,
.mr 1lIWT
IIF- I.'
no· t.J
IP- , ••

tIl'- J ••
rp- J ••
IEP-U.l

tmI 1lP-
Df'IlMlllH
D'.
4••
t.'
This 1s the disk space used by application
programmers for developing or maintaining systems.

• System
This is the disk space used by Operating System,
System Network facilities, program products
installed in the systems, and some operational
related files.

. 502 •

Find a CMG regional meeting near you at [Link]/regions


Learn the basics and latest aspects of IT Service Management at CMG's Annual Conference - [Link]/conference
~U""AKl Ut tUIUKt UtMANU:>

ST. PAUL SITE


Systems Date Needed

• AIF File Expansion 1/87


• 1099 Correction System 1/87
• Mortgage File Expansion 1/87

Buy the Latest Conference Proceedings and Find Latest Computer Performance Management 'How To' for All Platforms at [Link]
• Collection Management 1/B7
• Lobby Automation Support 1/87
• System/Database 2/87
• Billing File Expansion
Human Resources System
2/87
• 2/B7
• Personal Trust File Expansion 3/81
• Operation Print Project 3/B7
• System/Database 3/B7
Join over 14,000 peers - subscribe to free CMG publication, MeasureIT(tm), at [Link]/subscribe

ENERGY PARK SITE


Systems Date Needed

• Human Resources - Focus


System/Database
1/87
1/B7
• Time Accounting System 1/87
• AIM File Expansion 2/87
• Focus/Gateway Expansion 2/81

MSD GROlTH PRDJECTI_


ST. PAUL SITE

.......
.'..-....-
lZl-

-
MSD G~DWTH PROJECTIONS
ENE~GY PARK SITE
.,.
,,.'10
,.
"
.... .... .......
1=
Nfl
d

.
..
lZl'-'"

~1N"
-
IllllI me, ..
....
II
10
.- II£t un m
....
.. ... MY n•
-_.
- • .....,." PIft' !ftft

. 503 •

Find a CMG regional meeting near you at [Link]/regions

You might also like