Mananasi Fibre - Pilot Case Study - July 2024
Mananasi Fibre - Pilot Case Study - July 2024
July 2024
The project, implemented by The Chequered Flag and Mananasi Fibre, has been
awarded a UK International Development grant to implement a comprehensive
solution for pineapple biomass waste, including fibre extraction using the decortication
method. This pilot is complimented by a grant from UK Department for Environment,
Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) to pilot "Pineapple Plant Waste to Biochar”.
This case study report addresses both SMEP and DEFRA pilot activities.
The views expressed and information contained in this document (including any maps
and their respective borders) are not necessarily those of, or endorsed by, the UK
government, UNCTAD or the entities managing the delivery of SMEP, which can
accept no responsibility or liability for such views, completeness, or accuracy of the
information or any reliance placed on them.
A review of the global pineapple fibre extraction industry and market, including
barriers and opportunities, is presented followed by an overview of the pineapple
waste management solutions implemented by Mananasi, which include fibre
extraction, biochar and bio-compost manufacture.
An Interactive Business Model has been developed based on the Mananasi pilot,
and the report focuses on the development of a financial model. This includes the
creation and verification of an interactive Excel tool for widespread use and
commercial viability analysis, model testing as well as assessing the potential for
scaling. This tool allows for context-specific assumptions, such as energy costs, labour
costs, volumes, scale, and pricing, which have been developed based on farm visits
and data collection. This report provides a guide on use of the tool and assesses the
viability of a pineapple fibre and biochar model in other locations.
Finally, this report provides an overview of the social relationships of the project based
on a social impact assessment that was undertaken for the Mananasi operations.
The main data collection phase includes the development, presentation, and
refinement of survey tools, training, and oversight of enumerators for field data
collection, and case study research focusing on small-scale farmers, particularly
women. In this document, only the high-level findings are included.
Tables
Table 1: Table assessing the commercial viability of the Mananasi Limited total waste
management business model across pineapple-growing countries. Electricity price,
petrol price and unskilled labour wages are coloured according to their deviations from
the Kenyan price (red high, green low, yellow middle). Commercial viability is a high -
level estimate. ..............................................................................................................23
Table 2: List the Standards and Methodologies available for Biochar Projects .........32
Table 3: Carbon Projects Key Principles .....................................................................34
Table 4: Impact of Farm Harvest Based on Percentage Yields ..................................50
1 Introduction
The Chequered Flag Ltd, and Mananasi Fibre Ltd are working collaboratively to pilot
waste management technology and business model for the disposal of pineapple plant
waste resulting from the industrial production of pineapples at the Del Monte plantation
in Thika, Nairobi Kenya. The solution presented in this project is aimed at addressing
the air pollution and greenhouse gas emission problem associated with the burning of
pineapple waste, and by creating additional value from this waste through the
production of fibre and the creation of biochar which will generate revenue from carbon
credits and sale to local smallholder farmers.
The current practice at the Del Monte plantation, like many pineapple producers
around the world, is to rotate their pineapple crops every three and a half years. After
the final harvest, the spent plants are knocked to the ground and left to dry before
being burnt. The waste material amounts to approximately 40,000 tons of dry matter
per year which, when burnt, emits approximately 52,000 tons of CO 2, 2,800 kg of NO2,
along with other particulate and noxious gases that pollute the atmosphere.
The Del Monte plantation is located on the outskirts of Nairobi where its boundaries
are densely populated. The smoke produced from the pineapple waste fires drifts into
these areas of in-habitation where the fine particulate and other products of
combustion can cause a range of health problems. The practice of burning the plant
waste is detrimental to the next rotation of pineapples in that it depletes the soil of vital
nutrients and the heat from the fires bake the soil, collapsing its structure and killing its
microbiome.
To increase soil fertility, Del Monte uses mineral fertilisers to restore nutrients in the
soil. However, these fertilisers do not replenish the organic matter or the microbiome
essential for soil health. Additionally, mineral fertilisers have a large carbon footprint,
both in their manufacture and application. The current practice of burning plant waste
is also inefficient for crop rotation. Del Monte must wait until the plant waste has
completely dried in the sun before incineration, a process that can take up to six
months depending on the weather, delaying planting and reducing productivity.
The waste management solutions address these issues by intercepting the plant waste
to produce textile-grade fibres, biochar and organic compost.
The global pineapple industry has seen notable growth and development in recent
years. The market is projected to grow at a rate of 2% annually, with total production
expected to reach 37 million metric tons by 2030. As of 2024, the global pineapple
market is valued at approximately USD 28.79 billion and is projected to grow to USD
39.13 billion by 2029, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.33%. This
growth is driven by expanding harvested areas and increasing demand, particularly in
Asia and the Americas1.
1
[Link]
XaJtPotwKJ_ABFTu5zWmLhMrdrWUN_UQHNU2LpXAyBhJd
2
[Link]
3
2
Pineapples thrive in tropical regions with high temperatures and humidity. Pineapples
grow well in acidic loams, sandy loams, and clay loam soils under warm and humid
climates with sunny days and cool nights. Fertiliser requirements increase sharply after
planting and peak at two to four months before floral initiation. The typical growth cycle
is 18-24 months from planting to harvest, with plants capable of producing multiple
harvests over several years.
Planting densities range from 50,000 to 70,000 plants per hectare, depending on the
variety and cultivation practices. Farmers employ various techniques to optimise
pineapple production, including proper land preparation, optimal planting material, and
effective post-harvest management.
Pineapples are grown in over 82 countries with over 2.1 million acres under cultivation.
Figure 3: Trend in yields of pineapple production globally from the year 2012 to 20224
As of 2022, Indonesia was the world's largest pineapple producer, with an output of
approximately 3.2 million metric tons, followed by the Philippines at 2.91 million metric
tons and Costa Rica at around 2.9 million metric tons5. In 2023, Costa Rica and the
Philippines led in fruit exports, while the United States ranked as the top importer.
By 2024, Costa Rica, Indonesia, and the Philippines remained the leading global
producers6. Other major producers include Thailand, Brazil, China, Nigeria, and the
Ivory Coast.
4
[Link]
5
[Link]
6
[Link]
7
[Link]
8
[Link]
Kakuzi has a total of 100 ha under pineapple production, while Ndemo farm has 200
ha under pineapple production. Del Monte has the largest areas of pineapple
plantation in Kenya, spanning approximately 8,900 ha across Murang'a and Kiambu
counties. Kenya produces around 400,000 metric tons of pineapples annually, driven
by large-scale producers like Del Monte and numerous smallholder farmers.
9
[Link]
10
[Link]
Upadhyay/publication/243972083_Utilization_of_pineapple_waste_a_review_2010/links/00b4951d2af280d05600000
0/[Link]
11 [Link]
While significant progress has been made in developing and implementing pineapple
waste management strategies, several challenges and barriers persist, hindering the
widespread adoption of sustainable practices. These challenges include:
• Financial constraints: Many farmers face financial limitations that restrict their
ability to invest in waste management infrastructure, technologies, or services.
Lack of access to credit, financing mechanisms, or government support can
impede the implementation of effective waste management practices. SMEP
grant support to Mananasi Fibre Ltd helped to unlock the potential of waste
management in the Kenyan context.
• Technical expertise and capacity: Effective pineapple waste management
often requires technical expertise and capacity that may be lacking in some
regions or communities. Limited access to training, knowledge transfer, and
skilled personnel can hinder the successful adoption and operation of waste
management systems. The lessons learnt by Mananasi Fibre Limited, including
the underlying business model, are shared within this document to encourage
the adoption of integrated waste management.
12
[Link]
• Pineapple fibre is renowned for its delicate texture, surpassing many other
vegetable fibres in softness.
• With a length of approximately 60 cm, a pristine white hue, and a lustrous
quality akin to silk, the fibre readily absorbs and retains various dyes.
• Despite its fine feel, the fibre possesses a robustness ten times greater than
that of cotton.
• Derived from the leaves of the pineapple plant (Ananas comosus), this
multicellular lignocellulosic fibre comprises α-cellulose, hemicelluloses, and
lignin as its primary constituents.
• Typically yielding 2.5-3.3% of the weight of green leaves, the extraction
process underscores the resourcefulness of this sustainable material.
• When employed as an end fabric, pineapple fibre imparts a lightweight, easy-
care elegance reminiscent of linen.
The demand for pineapple fibre is one of the driving reasons behind the Mananasi Ltd
business model.
13 [Link]
Mananasi Fibre Ltd has provided this document and an interactive business model,
which focuses on lessons learnt, to allow other farmers and entrepreneurs to create a
high-level understanding of the processes involved in this pineapple total waste
management project.
The concept can be separated into two activities, namely (1) fibre processing and (2)
the creation of biochar and bio-compost.
3 Fibre Extraction
The fibre extraction process, which forms the financial backbone of the project due to
the high value of pineapple fibre, is currently underway and critical to the pilot's overall
success. The ongoing activities include:
Process 1:
• Plant Harvest: Immediately after the final fruit harvest, workers uproot the
plants by hand in the field and load them into trailers for transport to a central
processing facility and select leaves over 600 mm in length, suitable for fibre
production, and cut them from the plant. These selected leaves represent
approximately 40% of the available biomass. The harvesting and transportation
of pineapple plants and their leaves to the factory involve a series of
coordinated activities and resource management, ensuring the efficient
collection and delivery of raw materials for further processing.
o Based on the Mananasi Fibre Limited model, in the harvesting stage,
each worker can harvest approximately 300 kg of pineapple leaves per
Process 3:
• Baling: The fibre is packed into 100 kg bales using a hydraulic press. These
bales are then stored in a dry, well-covered shed, ready for packing into
containers and export. Each bale weighs 100 kg, with the baling machine
consuming 0.28 kWh of electricity per bale. The baling process involves two
operators per machine and incurs PET strap costs of 0.04 USD per metre, with
15 metres of strap used per bale. Each machine has a capacity to produce 8
bales per day and requires a shed size of 20 m².
• Sale: The fibre is exported via containers to markets in Europe and South-East
Asia.
This comprehensive and ongoing process ensures the efficient extraction and
preparation of high-quality pineapple fibre, providing the financial stability needed for
the project's success.
Process 2:
• Moisture Removal with Hydraulic Press: The first significant step in the
process is removing moisture from the effluent using a hydraulic press. Each
machine has a capacity to process 5,000 kg of effluent per hour and is operated
by two operators. The electricity consumption for this process is relatively low,
at 0.62 kWh per tonne of effluent processed. The hydraulic press effectively
reduces the water content in the effluent, resulting in a wet cake with a water
fraction of 75% and a dry matter fraction of 25%. The wet cake produced
requires careful waste disposal management, costing approximately 0.23 USD
per kg of fibre. Each hydraulic press operates in a shed space of 20 m2, making
it a compact yet efficient component of the overall process.
Process 4:
• Drying and Pyrolysis to Create Biochar: Once the wet cake is prepared, the
next stage involves drying and pyrolysis to transform the dry waste into biochar.
The drying process incurs a cost of 10.00 USD, with an additional labour of 2
people per kiln. Each batch of biochar production involves 330 kg of feedstock,
and through the pyrolysis process, approximately 89.14 kg of biochar is
produced per batch using a Kontiki Kiln (see below). The biochar produced has
a density of 107.40 kg/m³ in the kiln, with a dry matter fraction of 95% after
drying, reducing the moisture content to just 5%. The labour cost for producing
biochar requires two people per kiln. The biochar produced contains 45.80%
carbon, with a CO2 equivalent conversion factor of 3.67. Each kiln run-time is
approximately 1.5 hours.
• Carbon market and local compost sale: The biochar credits are sold on the
international market (see below), and bio-compost will also be made available
for sale locally.
Box 4: Variables used in the model design phase to account for regional differences in prices.
Labour costs are a critical factor in the current design of this project, as increasing
labour costs significantly influence the cost of goods. In the interactive business model,
a rough estimate of the cost of labour is provided to account for this. Additionally,
utilities will vary from country to country, affecting the overall cost structure. The costs
of machines and transport provided in the business model are based on the Mananasi
Fibre Limited model and are used in the processing assumptions tab to calculate the
necessary capital expenditures (capex) investments. The sale price is derived from
current market engagement work and contracts from Mananasi Fibre. Each project will
also differ in its financing mechanisms, so space is included to add up to two loans
and two grants at the project's start to help estimate cash flow requirements.
The farm size in the model is set at 4,200 hectares, with an average harvest distance
of 20 km one-way and a farm radius of 3.7 km. The pineapple plant yield is modelled
with an average plant size of 5 kg, of which 40% is leaves. The plant density is 72,000
plants per hectare, with a harvest percentage of 29% per year, resulting in a total leaf
yield of 172,800 tons per farm per year. The yield distribution is projected to increase
incrementally over the first ten years, from 5% in year one to 70% in years eight
through ten.
Labour costs are detailed with unskilled labour 14 at 3.8 USD per day and skilled
labour 15 at 8.0 USD per day. Overheads, including general and administrative
expenses, HR, management, and marketing, are estimated at a minimum of 50,000
14
Unskilled labour: tasks requiring a limited set of skills or abilities and minimal knowledge, typically involving daily
production work that does not rely on technical expertise or specialised training.
15
Skilled labour: roles that require specific training, expertise, or know-how to perform mental or physical tasks. The
roles require a higher level of education or specialised training to fulfil a job effectively.
USD. These overheads account for 35% of the cost of sales. The ratio of skilled to
unskilled labour is projected at 15:1, excluding office costs.
Utilities and capital expenditures (CAPEX) include a diesel price of 1.23 USD per litre,
electricity at 0.13 USD per kWh, and water at 0.77 USD per cubic metre. Construction
costs are estimated at 220 USD per square metre. Transport vehicles, such as a bus
for 52 passengers, cost 40,000 USD, while a tipper and tractor for harvesting cost
58,000 USD. Key processing equipment includes a decorticator at 50,000 USD, a
hydraulic press at 5,000 USD, a brusher at 4,000 USD, a bailer at 10,000 USD, and a
Kontiki kiln at 2,615 USD.
Revenue projections include biochar carbon credits at 110.00 USD per tonne of CO 2
equivalent, with 70.00% of the gross sales value going to biochar revenue share. The
biochar compost sale price is set at 300.00 USD per tonne (biochar component only),
and the fibre sale price is 7,300.00 USD per tonne. The cost of shipping fibre is
estimated at 0.23 USD per kg.
Project finance considerations include two grants of 500,000 USD each, disbursed in
the first year. Loan options are provided with a primary loan of 500,000 USD at an
interest rate of 13.00% over five years and a secondary loan. These variables form the
foundation for modelling the project's operations, costs, and financial planning,
ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the project's financial requirements.
i. The high costs of harvesting the plants and loading them into trailers, as well
as the high transportation costs of moving the material back to the processing
facility. To address this, the business, in the long run, will aim to develop a
prototype harvester which will automatically uproot the plants and deposit them
into the tipper trailer. This will greatly reduce production costs and make the
solution attractive in countries with higher labour costs.
ii. The business will also implement decorticators and shredders which are mobile
in the sense that they can easily be relocated between processing sites. To
fully utilise all Del Monte's feedstock, a number of processing sites will need to
be set up across the farm to be occupied depending on which part of the farm
the feedstock is coming from.
In evaluating the commercial sustainability and potential for scaling the Mananasi
business model to other countries, it is crucial to consider the varying economic and
environmental factors that impact each region. This assessment focuses on utility
costs, labour costs, and the total area of pineapple harvested in each country. By
comparing these variables to the established model in Kenya, where the business
model is proven to be successful, we can determine the viability of expanding the
operations to new locations. The analysis categorises countries into viable, not viable,
marginal, and not assessed groups, providing a comprehensive overview of where the
Mananasi business model can be effectively scaled to ensure long-term commercial
sustainability. By comparing these factors to Kenya, where the model is known to work,
we provide a high-level and rough estimate of the viability of the current structure in
other localities.
Countries like Angola, Bangladesh, Cuba, Ethiopia, India, and Nigeria show high
viability due to their lower electricity, petrol, and unskilled labour costs compared to
Kenya. For instance, Angola benefits from a 94% reduction in electricity costs, a
78.06% reduction in petrol prices, and a 29% reduction in labour costs, making the
business model highly viable.
Conversely, countries such as Australia, Taiwan, Costa Rica, and Ecuador are
deemed not viable due to significantly higher labour costs. In Australia, for example,
unskilled labour costs are 3268% higher than in Kenya, which drastically impacts the
overall cost structure and makes the model unsustainable.
Other countries like Belize, Brazil, Cameroon, China, and Peru fall into a marginal
category. These countries have mixed results with some utility costs being lower but
labour costs remaining higher than in Kenya. For example, China shows a 60%
reduction in electricity costs and a 25% reduction in petrol prices, but the labour cost
is 155% higher, making the model only marginally viable.
• Viable: 42 countries
• Not Viable: 14 countries
• Marginal: 16 countries
• Not Assessed: 14 countries
This is equivalent to the total areas of pineapples harvested per year (2022 data) in
each of the countries:
In summary, the core business model of creating fibre and biochar remains potentially
viable across 51 % of the global pineapple industry. Restructuring to reduce labour
costs would be necessary for some countries to maintain commercial viability in
marginal areas, accounting for 30% of global production. Adjusting the model to local
economic conditions is crucial for successful scaling.
Table 1: Table assessing the commercial viability of the Mananasi Limited total waste management
business model across pineapple-growing countries. Electricity price, petrol price and unskilled
labour wages are coloured according to their deviations from the Kenyan price (red high, green
low, yellow middle)16. Commercial viability is a high-level estimate.
Bolivia (Plurinational
No data No data $2.76 Viable
State of)
16
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
Democratic Republic of
$0.10 No data No data Viable
the Congo
United Republic of
$0.10 $1.23 $2.50 Viable
Tanzania
Venezuela (Bolivarian
$0.00 $0.01 $2.28 Viable
Republic of)
In the next section, we delve into the process of obtaining and selling carbon credits
from the biochar produced during the Mananasi Fibres process. This includes a
detailed examination of the methodologies used, the verification processes involved,
and the financial benefits accrued from these activities.
7 What is biochar?
Biochar is a stable, carbon-rich product derived from the thermal decomposition of
organic material under low oxygen conditions, a process known as pyrolysis. It is
similar to charcoal but is primarily used as a soil amendment rather than as a fuel
source. Biochar is made from various organic wastes, including agricultural residues,
forestry by-products, and other biomass materials. When applied to soil, biochar can
improve soil health, enhance crop yields, and contribute to carbon sequestration.
This process results in a stable, carbon-rich product that has several beneficial
characteristics for agricultural and environmental applications, including:
8 Climate Change
The release of greenhouse gases (GHGs), primarily carbon dioxide (CO 2), methane,
and nitrous oxide, is the key driver of current climate change. These gases are
released into the atmosphere through various activities, including the burning of fossil
fuels, energy production, agriculture, and industrial processes. Additionally, the
burning of agricultural waste and the production of fertilisers can also release GHGs.
In addition, the burning of agricultural waste contributes to air pollution that, according
to the World Health Organization (WHO), kills 7 million people a year including 650,000
children17.
As a greenhouse gas, carbon traps heat from the sun, preventing it from escaping
back into space, which leads to a warming of the Earth's surface. The increase in
atmospheric CO2 has already led to higher global temperatures and altered weather
patterns, making them more extreme and less predictable. This includes more frequent
droughts, heavier rainfall, and severe flooding. If significant action is not taken, the
17 [Link]
By incorporating biochar into soils, we achieve long-term carbon storage, making the
process carbon-negative, as it removes more CO2 from the atmosphere than it emits.
Furthermore, biochar can reduce emissions of other potent greenhouse gases like
methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) from soils by improving soil aeration and
nutrient retention. This, coupled with the potential use of by-products like syngas and
bio-oil as renewable energy sources, makes biochar an effective tool for mitigating
climate change, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and promoting sustainable
agricultural practices.
Biochar holds significant promise as a tool for climate change mitigation, but it is not a
silver bullet. Its potential to sequester carbon and improve soil health makes it a
valuable component of broader climate strategies. However, several challenges and
considerations must be addressed for biochar to realise its full potential including
scaling production, economic viability and regulatory and policy support.
• Cellulose and Lignin: Pineapple leaves and cores contain significant amounts
of cellulose and lignin. These organic compounds are crucial for producing
biochar with a high carbon content and a stable structure.
• Abundance of waste: Pineapples produce a lot of by-products that can be
used to make biochar. Between 55 to 70 percent of pineapple is waste (crown,
leaves, peel and core). Utilising this waste reduces the amount of organic
waste that needs to be managed or disposed of.
• Value-added product: Converting pineapple waste into biochar adds
economic value to what would otherwise be an agricultural waste product.
• Sustainability: Pineapple plants grow relatively quickly and are cultivated in
large quantities. The waste generated from pineapple farming and processing
is a renewable resource, making it a sustainable feedstock for biochar
production.
11 Carbon credits
11.1 What are carbon credits?
Carbon credits help companies, countries and individuals meet their carbon emission
reduction targets (e.g. net zero targets - where annual carbon emissions are in balance
with carbon removals).
The most important carbon market for Biochar is the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM).
The VCM was developed separately from Compliance Carbon Markets (CCM), and
has grown rapidly since 2016, with the intention of enabling private organisations and
individuals to purchase carbon credits voluntarily, either for corporate social
responsibility, offsetting their carbon footprints or for achieving corporate net-zero
targets. Many projects already have voluntary buyers of credits lined up, including
corporations and philanthropists.
Although international compliance markets still cover more GHG emissions than the
VCM, the VCM is growing relative to compliance markets as the demand for carbon
credits by private actors increases.
The VCM is much more flexible than the CCM however, the VCM faces some
challenges:
Biochar has a high carbon content typically >40%. The carbon credits generated from
biochar production vary based on the type of feedstock and production methods.
Generally, one tonne of biochar can sequester between 1.5 to 3 tons of CO equivalent
(CO2e). This means for every tonne of biochar produced, 1.5 to 3 carbon credits can
be earned, making biochar an effective tool for carbon sequestration and a valuable
commodity in the carbon credits market.
Each carbon project must choose a standard. A carbon standard is a complete set of
rules, procedures, and approved monitoring methodologies under which certified
carbon credits are quantified and issued. The decision on the carbon credit standard
and methodology to use affects processes at later stages such as project registration,
monitoring and reporting, and markets where the credits can be sold.
Biochar projects can be ‘high or low tech’ and this is reflected in the standards and
methods chosen.
• High tech:
o Characterised by advanced, automated equipment: sophisticated,
controlled pyrolysis units or reactors that allow precise control of
temperature, residence time, and other parameters to optimise biochar
quality
Gold Standard Gold Standard Certifies carbon offset projects with High
Foundation a strong emphasis on sustainable
development and delivering high
climate benefits.
Business Plan:
If this biomass is wet, and in the field, the transport costs can be
prohibitive. Labour costs increase significantly when biochar is
delivered to farmers in a wet state, as its weight makes it difficult to
handle, requiring additional manpower for transportation and
application
Wet biomass is heavier and more voluminous than when it’s dry. This
increases the cost of loading, transport and offloading.
The drying of wet biomass after transportation from the field incurs
additional expense. In order to effectively dry the material, chipping,
mechanical dewatering, rotary dryers and sun drying are all possible
solutions however the additional operations are expensive.
Without decortication, and the value addition from fibre, it is unlikely
that a biochar project will be financially viable in its own right, due to
these high costs of transport and the costs of production, compared
to the relatively low margin of return. The cost of production in the
Mananasi Fibre business is $114 per carbon credit, excluding
transport costs. This cost is equivalent to the current market price for
these credits. Production costs vastly increase due to the costs of
drying of wet material post decortication, which must be considered.
• The farm reaches out to a project developer who specialises in biochar and
carbon credit projects. The project developer provides expertise, resources,
and guidance throughout the project lifecycle.
Scoping, Concept Development, and Feasibility Study:
• Together, the farm and the project developer conduct an initial scoping to
identify the project’s potential impact and feasibility. This includes assessing
the availability of feedstock (such as agricultural residues), potential production
methods, and initial cost estimates. A detailed feasibility study evaluates
technical, economic, and environmental aspects to ensure the project’s
viability.
o The national policy environment is a key consideration in the
development of a project. In Kenya, changing legislation and a potential
“carbon” tax being debated during the early stages of Mananasi Fibre
have created uncertainty about project financing and returns.
Project Documentation and Design including Life Cycle Assessment (LCA):
• The project documentation and LCA are carried out by the project developer
and a third-party verifier (e.g. Planboo). This documentation then forms the
PDD (project design document) which is then sent to review by the carbon
standard organisation.
Register Project with Carbon Standard:
• After proving the project’s additionality (i.e., demonstrating that the carbon
sequestration benefits would not occur without the project), early financing is
secured to kick start the implementation phase. This could involve grants,
loans, or investments from stakeholders interested in the project’s
environmental benefits.
Implementation and monitoring:
• The monitoring data is collected daily using both hardware and software. This
equipment is provided by an MRV (measuring, reporting and verification)
provider, who in this case in Planboo. This verification process confirms that
the project is achieving the expected carbon sequestration and other
environmental benefits.
Approved Carbon Credits:
• Based on the verification reports, carbon credits are approved by the carbon
standard organisation. These credits represent the quantified amount of CO 2
equivalent that has been sequestered or mitigated by the biochar project.
Sell Carbon Credits:
• The approved carbon credits are sold on the carbon market to buyers looking
to offset their emissions. The revenue generated from these sales supports the
financial sustainability of the biochar project.
• There are several markets for carbon credits produced from biochar globally.
The following are potential markets for carbon credits from the biochar.
To understand how much carbon dioxide is sequestered in a project, the project must
develop a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Using an LCA for biochar credits involves
evaluating the environmental impacts of biochar production, usage, and end-of-life
stages to determine its overall carbon sequestration benefits and sustainability. This
includes:
i. Leaves Sourcing:
Assessment: Evaluate the environmental impacts of sourcing the leaves used to
produce biochar. This includes land use, agricultural practices, transportation of
raw materials, and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
iii. Transportation:
v. End-of-Life:
Assessment: Consider the long-term stability and decomposition of biochar in soil.
Biochar is highly stable and can sequester carbon for hundreds to thousands of
years.
By applying LCA, stakeholders can ensure that biochar projects are environmentally
sustainable and that the carbon credits generated are based on a comprehensive
understanding of the entire life cycle of biochar. This approach helps in making
informed decisions, optimising processes, and enhancing the credibility of biochar as
a carbon sequestration strategy.
i. Grant funding - the project will not bear the burden of repaying a loan, and
sales revenues will immediately be available. The commercial finance sector
usually considers some projects too risky, due to uncertainty of whether a
project will achieve validation at all. Therefore, some charitable and large
donor funds are specifically geared to such projects.
ii. Loan or Project Financing - A loan designed to cover pre-issuance costs of
the project could be sought from any commercial lender (bank, financial
institution) but many of these lenders will find it hard to secure their loan. A loan
can also be secured from a buyer in the VCM. A company or reseller who is
keen to secure access to the future inventory from a project may be willing to
advance a loan to the project proponent to cover the development costs. The
funds will then be paid back out of the agreed payments for the purchase of the
future generated credits, ideally following a schedule that ensures that cash
flow to the business from sales is not affected in the early years of
implementation.
iii. Prepayment - This will allow a VCM buyer or reseller to agree at an early-stage
prices for the credits, and likely will also involve the pre-paid credits being
priced at a significant discount.
iv. Investment - Where a project financier provides upfront working capacity for a
project in return for a share of the project revenues or carbon credits.
Agreements can have a joint venture or revenue-sharing structure, including
an equity stake.
As part of the SMEP grant process, Mananasi Fibre Limited has begun to develop a
biochar carbon credit project. The following outlines the steps undertaken by Mananasi
Fibre.
ii. Initially, Planboo was the sole provider of MRV equipment for Artisan Pro
biochar production, making them the obvious choice. However, recently
other companies have registered under CSI, offering similar services.
Despite this, Planboo continues to have a strong market presence with a
high demand for biochar credits, reducing the risk of unsold credits. This
dynamic may shift as new companies grow and establish themselves,
providing potential alternatives. For projects involving smallholder
pineapple producers in cooperatives, which focus on artisan biochar
production using pit kilns, Biochar Life is another established MRV provider
and might be a better fit.
i. Criou was in the process of becoming a C-sink manager18 for CSI’s Global
Artisan C Sink methodology. A C-sink manager is legally registered in the
specific country where they manage artisan operations. Their role is to
make sure the biochar producer is adhering to the global artisan c sink
methodology, appoint an MRV provider, and act as the in-between for the
biochar producers and credit brokers/buyers.
ii. Due to the low volume of available feedstock from pineapple waste during
the early stages of the business and the fact that a Kontiki kiln was already
an accredited kiln under CSI, it meant the process of accreditation would
be quick. Kontiki kilns are the only verified kilns currently under the global
artisan C Sink method. Kontiki Kilns are relatively cheap at around $2500.
iii. There are currently two certified kilns under CSI’s Global Biochar C Sink
method (the upscaled version), Pyreg and Syncraft, these are both larger
high-tech kilns, outside the price threshold of this project. If Mananasi were
to upscale in the future and produce more than 1500m 3 per annum, then
they would be able to upgrade to the Global Biochar C Sink Methodology.
These kilns are more expensive costing > $1,000,000.
v. The project is considered Puro, Earth and Verra as other standards but
Criou had experience of the long timescale needed to establish these more
high-tech industrial solutions to generate its first credit. Not only would the
registration process take longer with Verra, but the price of credit is lower
than with CSI.
• LCA: Criou worked with Planboo to collect the data required to carry out the
pre-feasibility, feasibility and LCA19. The document that was created and the
data inputs required can be seen in the Appendix.
• Monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV): Planboo’s MRV consists of
hardware, which is attached to each kiln and software, on a smartphone, which
is used to plug in the data collected and create a report. These data take into
account the volume of feedstock per run, the volume of biochar produced per
run, moisture content of the feedstock before it is pyrolysed, temperature the
kiln reaches, videos/photos of the pyrolysis process in the Kontiki kiln,
videos/photos of quenching the biochar at the end of each run, videos/photos
of mixing the biochar with compost, manure or slurry and videos/photos of
application of the mixed biochar on the soil. The process is critical for the
transparency of the project with its credit buyers. The more transparent and
18 An Artisan C-Sink Manager is a company or organisation which manages and oversees Artisan Biochar
Producers, C-Sink Networks, Artisan Pros, and C-Sink Villages. The Artisan C-Sink Manager is legally
registered in the specific country where he manages artisan operations. Their role is to make sure the
biochar producer is adhering to the global artisan c sink methodology, appoint an MRV provider, act as
the in between for the biochar producers and credit brokers/buyers.
19 Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA): a comprehensive evaluation method used to assess the environmental
impacts associated with all stages of biochar production and utilisation, from feedstock collection,
production processes, and transportation, to application and end-of-life.
detailed you are when explaining the project to credit buyers, the more
confidence those buyers have in the project.
• Upgrading to World Biochar Certificate (WBC): Once the pilot is up and
running and the business model has been proven to work, and the project
wants to scale, it would have to move from the Global Artisan C-sink
methodology (which caps biochar production at 500 tons per annum) to a WBC
certificate, which is another methodology under CSI.
• The process of drying through hydraulic presses and in open fields, in addition
to the pyrolysis process, puts the cost of a credit at around $114, excluding the
harvesting and decortication costs.
• This cost is equal to the current price per credit, and once a revenue share is
paid to the project developers, the business will likely be incurring costs for
every credit produced.
• To overcome this, new methods for drying the feedstock before pyrolysis are
being trialled.
• In addition, there is a limited market for the bio-compost produced. This biochar
and bio-compost can have positive impacts on soil and plant health (see
below). When this revenue stream is accounted for it will be likely that the
biochar process will generate profit for the business - currently, there is no
secure large-scale purchaser of the bio-compost. Securing a market for the bio-
compost from the outset is a key lesson.
Biochar is increasingly recognized worldwide for its positive impacts on soil health and
agricultural productivity. For example:
2. China:
3. Africa:
4. South America:
20 [Link]
21 [Link]
22 [Link]
23 [Link]
To understand the impact of biochar derived from pineapple fibre and to verify if it
meets these expectations, Sandeman Agronomy Services Ltd conducted tests on the
effects of biochar and bio compost on soil and crop health that was produced by
Mananasi Fibre Ltd.
The study included 16 treatments with various rates of biochar and compost. Biochar
treatments were applied at rates of 3.7kg/M, 2.0kg/M, and 1.24kg/M. Similar rates were
applied for compost biochar mix treatments. A control treatment following the farm
standard procedure was also included for comparison. A randomised plot design with
four repetitions for each treatment was employed to ensure robust and unbiased
results. The repetitions included all treatments distributed in a randomised manner
across the plots. All treatments followed the standard procedure to ensure that the only
variable was the organic material used. The pineapple variety used was MD2, with a
planting rate equivalent to 72,500 plants per hectare. The soil pH was maintained at
5.1. Nutrient rounds consisted of applying NPK 17-17-17 granular fertiliser at a rate of
10 grams per plant during the first and second months.
Soil health analysis was conducted seven weeks post-planting, examining various
chemical aspects and parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity, phosphorus,
potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulphur, sodium, iron, manganese, boron, copper,
zinc, cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, organic matter, carbon to nitrogen ratio,
exchangeable acidity, and acid saturation. Soil samples were collected using a soil
auger to a depth of 10 cm, with 12 samples taken per treatment. These samples were
amalgamated into two comprehensive samples per treatment for
analysis. Measurements focused on key soil health indicators, providing insights into
the impact of specific soil amendment treatments.
Green Area Index (GAI) readings were taken at three- and six-weeks post-planting
using digital photography with the BASF GAI application. This method offered a
quantitative measure of the photosynthetic material present in the crop canopy, with
12 readings per treatment ensuring robust data collection.
Soil pH: Biochar-enriched compost is expected to neutralise acidic soils due to high
levels of carbonates, thus reducing exchangeable acidity. Studies, including one by
the Natural Science Foundation of China, have shown that biochar application
significantly increases soil pH and reduces exchangeable acidity, Aluminium, and
Hydrogen levels. The current study observed a 9.16% increase in soil pH in biochar-
treated plots compared to untreated plots, aligning with previous findings.
Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC): Biochar increases the CEC of soil, improving its
ability to retain positively charged cations like potassium, magnesium, and calcium.
The study found a 13.81% increase in CEC in biochar-treated plots, indicating better
nutrient retention and soil fertility.
Organic Matter: Biochar-enriched compost increased soil organic matter from 2.97%
in untreated plots to 4.26% in treated plots. This enhancement aids in moisture
retention and soil structure, promoting better crop growth.
Micronutrients: Iron and zinc levels increased by 23.48% and 45.35%, respectively,
in biochar-treated plots, while sodium and manganese levels slightly decreased.
Green Area Index (GAI): Biochar-enriched compost positively influenced the GAI of
pineapple plants. At three weeks, moderate biochar application rates showed slight
increases in GAI. By six weeks, higher application rates led to marginally significant
increases, suggesting that biochar's effects on crop growth become more pronounced
over time. The highest increase in GAI between weeks three and six was 11.96% with
biochar alone at 3.7 kg/M. The results demonstrated that the application of biochar,
both alone and in combination with compost, consistently leads to higher increases in
growth compared to the untreated control when assessing the increase in green area
index between week 3 and week 6 following planting.
Conclusion
The full socio-economic baseline and impact assessment of Mananasi Fibre's first year
of operations have been provided separately. Here, we summarise the key findings.
The report investigates the socio-economic impact of Mananasi Fibre's waste
management strategy on the local community and workforce, providing insights into
employment conditions, worker wellbeing, and the potential benefits of biochar for local
farmers. The research involved a survey of 61 workers and interviews with farm
management and three small-scale farmers who received biochar in exchange for
banana stems. Data collection occurred over five days, focusing on poverty levels,
working conditions, well-being, and the impact of biochar on farm productivity.
Results
• Wages: Most workers earn below the Living Wage benchmark but above the
national minimum wage, contributing significantly to household income. The
income earned from employment on Mananasi farm is very important for most
workers: 73% of workers stated that the income earned from their job
contributes 81-100% of their household income.
• Healthcare: More workers saw their ability to pay for healthcare improve or
remain stable than those who saw it worsen.
• Job Satisfaction: Most workers are satisfied with their jobs and would like
long-term employment.
Three farmers received biochar, predicting benefits such as cost savings on fertilisers,
reduced labour costs, and improved soil stability and moisture retention. However, it is
too early to measure the actual yield improvements.
Potential impact
Sustain East Africa supports organisations, big and small, to use the latest social and
ecological science, knowledge, and tools, to solve sustainability challenges through
evidence-informed strategies.
Sustain East Africa has supported Mananasi Fibred Limited in developing this report.
Criou Energy
Their team has several members across the sustainability and development space,
including business development, carbon credits, partnership development, project
management, stakeholder engagement, engineering, agronomy, sustainable crop
production, and product development.
RECOMMENDED CITATION
Sustain East Africa and Criou Energy (2024). Pineapple farming Waste Management:
A case study on Mananasi Fibre, Thika, Kenya. Prepared on behalf of The Chequered
Flag and Mananasi Fibre Ltd.