Scribd
Upload
37 views4 pages

Evaluation Checklist Demo

The document is an evaluation checklist for demonstration teaching in literacy training at the Philippine College of Science and Technology. It includes criteria for assessing lesson planning, instructional skills, communication skills, classroom management, and teacher personality, with a rating scale from excellent to poor. Evaluators are instructed to provide numerical ratings and comments on the practice teacher's performance.

Uploaded by

maryjanecaoile83
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views4 pages

Evaluation Checklist Demo

The document is an evaluation checklist for demonstration teaching in literacy training at the Philippine College of Science and Technology. It includes criteria for assessing lesson planning, instructional skills, communication skills, classroom management, and teacher personality, with a rating scale from excellent to poor. Evaluators are instructed to provide numerical ratings and comments on the practice teacher's performance.

Uploaded by

maryjanecaoile83
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR DEMONSTRATION TEACHING

LITERACY TRAINING SERVICE II


PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

SCHOOL
NAME OF DEMONSTRATORS
CLASSROOM NO.
COURSE/BLOCK
SUBJECT GRADE LEVEL
TOPIC/SUBJECT MATTER
DATE TIME
DIRECTION: Each item is a description of the demonstration teaching performance. Please enter your numerical rating by putting check on the appropriate box which represents your
on the practice teacher’s performance.
5- Excellent(E), 4- Very Satisfactory(VS), 3- Satisfactory(S), 2- Fair(F), 1- Poor(P)

CRITERIA E VS S
A. LESSON PLANNING
1. Skill in formulating specific and attainable objectives
2. Ability to suit subject matter to the objective(s) of the lesson
3. Congruency of learning activities with the learning objectives.
4. Ability to use appropriate assessment tools.
B. TEACHER’S INSTRUCTIONAL SKILLS
1. Ability to motivate learners
2. Knowledge of subject matter
3. Skill in selecting and using appropriate methods and techniques of
teaching
4. Creativity in adapting methods to the pupils/students’ activities
5. Organization and sequence of lesson execution.
6. Skill in selecting and using effective teaching aids and devices
7. Sustenance of learner’s interest and attention.
Ability to explain and discuss abstract concepts within the grasping .8
ability of the students
9. Ability to make use of effective evaluation of instruction
10. Ability to motivate or explain clearly the given agreements/
assignments
11. Identification and observation of safety measures
C. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
1. Voice control and modulation
2. Proficiency in the language of instruction (correct grammar and
pronunciation)
3. Ability to ask relevant and thought-provoking questions
4. Skill in writing clearly and legibly both on the board and paper /skill in
choosing appropriate font style and font size for a readable and
conducive presentation
D. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
1. Routine preparation of activities: systematic way of checking
attendance, assignment/homework, group work/projects, etc.
2. Ability to enhance pupil/student participation.
3. Maintenance of order and discipline (even in an online learning
environment)
4. Ability to organize instructional materials within easy reach
E. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
1. Physical appearance and poise
2. Ability to command respect and attention
3. Ability to project a strong teacher’s personality
AVERAGE DEMONSTRATION TEACHING PERFORMANCE
(TOTAL/26) 0.00 0.00
SCALE with DESCRIPTIVE EQUIVALENT
5.00- 4.20 – Outstanding, 3.40- 4.19 -- Very Satisfactory, 2.60- 3.39 – Satisfactory, 1.80- 2.59 – Fair, 1.00- 1.79 -- Poor
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS:

EVALUATOR/S
ON TEACHING

propriate box which represents your evaluation

r(P)

F P
00- 1.79 -- Poor

You might also like