1 CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background to the Study

Water scarcity has become an urgent challenge, impacting millions globally. As populations

grow and climate patterns shift unpredictably, freshwater resources face unprecedented strain.

By 2030, global water demand is expected to exceed supply by 40% (World Bank, 2023). In

Nigeria, rapid urbanization and outdated infrastructure have worsened this crisis. Cities like

Lagos and Abuja struggle with shortages, relying heavily on costly solutions like groundwater

pumping. However, one area often ignored in addressing water scarcity is education.

Universities and polytechnics, with their large campuses and high-water needs for labs,

dormitories, and green spaces, are ideal candidates for demonstrating sustainable solutions.

This study focuses on the Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa (FPN) Postgraduate School,

exploring how rainwater harvesting—a practice used for centuries—can be redesigned to meet

modern climate challenges.

The importance of this topic goes beyond water access. Modern architecture must balance

aesthetics, functionality, and environmental responsibility. Concepts like regenerative design

emphasize buildings that repair ecosystems rather than just reducing harm (Mang & Reed,

2021). Similarly, the circular economy model encourages reusing water continuously instead

of treating it as a single-use resource (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2020). These ideas are

already being tested globally. For example, Singapore’s BCA Academy uses rainwater

systems to cover 40% of its non-drinking water needs (Zhang et al., 2021), while Uganda’s

Makerere University cut municipal water use by 30% after installing rooftop collection tanks

1
(Nabunya et al., 2019). Such projects show that schools can act as real-world sustainability

labs.

Rainwater harvesting involves capturing rainfall before it becomes runoff. Methods vary from

basic rain barrels to advanced systems with filters and underground storage. Recent

innovations include “smart” tanks with sensors to track water quality and levels (Campisano et

al., 2021). Features like permeable pavements and bioswales also help slow runoff and

recharge groundwater. These solutions are flexible: a small building might use simple gutters

and tanks, while larger campuses can link decentralized systems into shared networks.

Existing research highlights both successes and challenges. A 2020 review of 45 projects in

Sub-Saharan Africa found rainwater systems in schools lasted longer than those in homes,

partly because institutions provided better oversight (Kayaga et al., 2020). For instance,

Kenya’s Technical University of Mombasa uses harvested water to cool HVAC systems,

reducing energy costs by 15% (Onyango & Adhiambo, 2022). However, issues like poor

maintenance and clogged tanks caused 68% of systems in Nigerian colleges to fail within five

years (Adeboye & Alabi, 2021). This shows that technology alone isn’t enough—community

involvement and training are key.

Many studies focus on standalone water systems rather than embedding them into building

design. At FPN’s proposed postgraduate school, rainwater harvesting could be central to the

architecture itself. For example, angled roofs might direct rainfall into decorative cisterns,

while sunken courtyards could serve as infiltration basins. This aligns with biophilic design,

which integrates natural elements to improve well-being (Browning et al., 2022). Students

wouldn’t just study sustainability—they’d experience it daily.

2
The impact of this work is broad. Nigeria’s universities and polytechnics enroll over 2 million

students (National Bureau of Statistics, 2023). If half adopted similar systems, water

conservation efforts could shift national consumption trends. Academically, this study

connects architecture and environmental science, encouraging collaboration across fields.

Practically, it offers designs using local materials, avoiding expensive imports that often stall

projects. Symbolically, prioritizing rainwater harvesting in schools signals that sustainability

is a necessity, not just a trend.

Policy changes could amplify these efforts. While Nigeria’s National Water Policy (2020)

vaguely supports alternative water sources, Tanzania requires rainwater systems in all new

schools in drought-prone areas (Mati et al., 2021). This research could push Nigerian

policymakers to adopt similar mandates. Additionally, architecture students involved in such

projects gain skills in climate-responsive design, preparing them for future challenges.

Some may argue rainwater harvesting is a temporary fix for Nigeria’s failing water

infrastructure. For instance, 40% of treated water is lost through leaky pipes before reaching

homes (WaterAid Nigeria, 2022). However, waiting for large-scale infrastructure repairs isn’t

practical. Harvesting provides immediate relief and resilience against climate shocks. Last

year, irregular rainfall forced FPN’s main campus to rely on water trucks for weeks (Personal

communication, FPN Facilities Office, 2023). A dedicated system would safeguard against

such disruptions, ensuring uninterrupted education.

In the end, this isn’t just about pipes and tanks. It’s about reimagining the role of educational

spaces in a resource-constrained future. Campuses have always been microcosms of society –

now they must become prototypes for its survival.

3
1.2 Statement of the Problem

While rainwater harvesting has gained traction as a sustainable water management strategy, its

application in educational institutions – particularly in Nigeria’s tertiary sector – remains

understudied and inconsistently implemented. Existing research predominantly focuses on

residential, agricultural, or commercial settings, creating a glaring gap in context-specific

frameworks for academic environments (Adeboye & Alabi, 2021; Eze et al., 2021). For

instance, a 2023 review of 28 Sub-Saharan African studies revealed that only three addressed

institutional rainwater systems, and none provided scalable design guidelines tailored to

campus architectures (Gondwe et al., 2023). This oversight is problematic because universities

and polytechnics operate differently: they combine high-density accommodations, laboratories

with stringent water quality needs, and expansive green spaces requiring irrigation. Without

systems designed for these unique demands, institutions like FPN Postgraduate School default

to unsustainable practices, such as over-reliance on groundwater extraction or water truck

deliveries during shortages – solutions that strain municipal resources and inflate operational

budgets (WaterAid Nigeria, 2022). Compounding this issue, Nigeria’s National Water Policy

(2020) lacks enforceable mandates for rainwater harvesting in public buildings, leaving

institutions without regulatory incentives or standardized benchmarks. The problem, therefore,

is twofold: How can a postgraduate school in a water-stressed region like Southeastern Nigeria

integrate a context-specific, cost-effective rainwater harvesting system into its architectural

design, and what structural, financial, and maintenance strategies ensure its long-term

viability? This question isn’t merely technical; it’s urgent. Recent droughts have forced FPN

to ration water for weeks, disrupting research and sanitation (FPN Facilities Office, 2023).

4
Meanwhile, neighboring institutions face similar crises, with 65% of Nigerian universities

reporting annual water shortages (National Universities Commission, 2022). Investigating this

problem matters because educational campuses aren’t just water consumers – they’re

community anchors. A functional harvesting system at FPN could alleviate local aquifer

depletion, reduce flood risks by managing stormwater runoff, and serve as a replicable model

for Nigeria’s tertiary institutions. Without targeted solutions, the cycle of water insecurity will

persist, undermining both academic productivity and regional ecological resilience.

1.3 Justification for the Study

The potential impact of this research spans practical, academic, and policy realms. First, a

successfully designed water harvesting system for FPN could reduce the school’s water

expenditure by up to 50%, based on comparable projects in Ghana (Domènech & Saurí, 2020).

Second, the study provides actionable data for policymakers drafting Nigeria’s National Water

Policy, which currently lacks enforceable standards for institutional water management

(Federal Ministry of Water Resources, 2020). Practitioners, including architects and engineers,

would benefit from a case study demonstrating how to retrofit existing structures with

harvesting systems without compromising aesthetics. Future researchers could expand on this

work by testing new materials for storage tanks or exploring solar-powered purification

systems. Most importantly, this study fills the gap identified earlier: it shifts the focus from

generic water harvesting models to solutions tailored for educational settings. By aligning

architectural innovation with sustainability education, FPN could become a benchmark for

Nigeria’s tertiary institutions struggling with water scarcity (National Universities

Commission, 2022).
5
1.4 Aim of the Study

The primary aim of this study is to propose a water harvesting system integrated into the

architectural design of FPN’s Postgraduate School, ensuring sustainability, cost-efficiency,

and adaptability to local climatic conditions.

1.5 Objectives of the Study

1. To assess the current water consumption patterns and infrastructure limitations at FPN.

2. To design a rainwater harvesting system compatible with the postgraduate school’s

architectural layout and regional rainfall data.

3. To evaluate the system’s feasibility based on cost, maintenance requirements, and

potential reductions in municipal water dependency.

6
 2 CHAPTER TWO

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 Review of Relevant Empirical Studies

Postgraduate schools in Nigeria face a paradox: they are expected to foster advanced research

and innovation, yet their infrastructure often lags behind global standards. Okoye, Eze, and

Onyema (2021) explored this disconnect by surveying six Nigerian polytechnics, including

Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa (FPN). Their mixed-methods study combined facility audits

with interviews of 45 postgraduate students and faculty. The researchers aimed to benchmark

Nigerian postgraduate facilities against UNESCO’s Guidelines for Quality Assurance in

Higher Education. They found that 80% of classrooms lacked adequate ventilation, and none

had integrated water harvesting systems, despite FPN’s location in Nasarawa State – a region

with seasonal water scarcity. Financial constraints and a lack of policy enforcement emerged

as key barriers. While the study successfully highlighted infrastructural gaps, its narrow focus

on polytechnics limited its applicability to universities. The team recommended prioritizing

public-private partnerships for facility upgrades but left unanswered how to retrofit existing

structures affordably.

Contrast this with South Africa’s Stellenbosch University, where van der Merwe and Jacobs

(2022) conducted a longitudinal case study on water harvesting in postgraduate facilities.

Their project, which ran from 2018 to 2021, tracked the installation of a 50,000-liter rooftop

catchment system paired with UV filtration. Using water usage logs and cost-benefit analysis,

they demonstrated a 60% reduction in municipal water dependency. However, the system’s

success relied heavily on donor funding – a luxury most Nigerian institutions lack. Notably,

7
van der Merwe’s team acknowledged that their design might not suit regions with irregular

rainfall, like Northern Nigeria, where storage demands are higher. This admission underscores

the need for climate-adaptive models tailored to specific ecological zones.

In Nigeria’s academic context, Eze, Ajayi, and Okoro (2021) provided critical insights through

their comparative analysis of water management practices in 12 universities. Using purposive

sampling, they selected institutions from six geopolitical zones, including the University of

Jos in the water-stressed Middle Belt. Their objectives were to evaluate existing rainwater

systems and identify barriers to adoption. Shockingly, only two universities had functional

harvesting systems, both installed through foreign grants. Key findings revealed that 70% of

maintenance staff lacked training in system upkeep, leading to rapid dysfunction. While the

study effectively mapped institutional inertia, it overlooked student and faculty perceptions – a

gap later addressed by Nwankwo (2023), who found that 82% of postgraduate students at FPN

supported water harvesting but felt excluded from decision-making.

2.1.1 Review of Related Projects and Designs

Architectural innovation in postgraduate schools often prioritizes aesthetics over utility, but

recent projects in West Africa hint at a shift. Daramola and Adebayo (2022) documented the

design of the African University of Science and Technology (AUST) Abuja’s postgraduate

block, which incorporates sunken courtyards inspired by Hausa earth architecture. Their case

study, part of a broader action research project, aimed to blend cultural heritage with modern

sustainability. The courtyards channel stormwater into underground tanks, reducing runoff by

45%. However, the project’s reliance on imported filtration units raised costs by 30%, limiting

scalability. The researchers concluded that localization of materials is critical but didn’t

provide a framework for achieving it – an omission this study seeks to address.

University of Science and Technology (KNUST). Their quasi-experimental study compared

water retention in buildings with conventional roofs versus those with vegetated layers. Using

sensors and rainfall simulators, they found that green roofs delayed peak runoff by 20 minutes,

allowing gradual infiltration. The design cut irrigation needs by 35%, but high installation

costs deterred university administrators from expanding the pilot. This echoes findings from

Nigeria’s University of Ibadan, where a 2020 retrofit of postgraduate hostels with rainwater

gutters failed due to poor slope calculations. Okafor (2020) attributed the failure to “copy-

paste” designs from temperate climates, emphasizing that Nigeria’s intense rains require

steeper gutter angles.

Closer to Nasarawa, the Federal University of Lafia’s 2022 postgraduate annex offers lessons.

Aliu et al. (2022) analyzed its use of perforated aluminum screens to filter rooftop debris – a

low-cost alternative to commercial filters. Their technical report noted a 25% improvement in

water quality compared to traditional mesh systems. However, the screens required monthly

cleaning during the rainy season, a labor-intensive process. The team suggested automating

maintenance but didn’t explore how. These case studies collectively reveal a pattern:

successful water harvesting in academic settings demands context-specific designs, localized

materials, and participatory maintenance plans – elements absent in most Nigerian projects.

Existing studies overwhelmingly focus on whether to implement water harvesting, not how to

integrate it seamlessly into postgraduate school designs. For instance, Adeyemi’s (2021)

comparative study of Nigerian and South African standards meticulously catalogued facility

shortcomings but offered no actionable retrofit strategies. Similarly, while Gondwe et al.

(2023) mapped policy barriers in Sub-Saharan Africa, their work neglected the role of

9
architectural pedagogy in perpetuating unsustainable designs. This study fills these voids by

proposing a phased integration model that aligns harvesting systems with FPN’s existing

layout, using cost-localized materials like reinforced bamboo gutters and laterite-coated

storage tanks. Additionally, it addresses the maintenance gap through a stakeholder co-design

framework, ensuring buy-in from students, staff, and local artisans.

2.2 Conceptual Review

2.2.1 Concept of postgraduate educational facilities in Nigeria

Postgraduate education in Nigeria is a critical driver of national development, yet the facilities

designed to support it often clash with the ambitions of advanced research and specialized

training. The National Universities Commission (NUC) and the National Board for Technical

Education (NBTE) outline minimum infrastructure standards for postgraduate schools,

emphasizing features like dedicated research labs, high-capacity digital libraries, and

collaborative workspaces (NUC, 2020). However, the reality on the ground tells a different

story. A 2023 audit of 15 Nigerian postgraduate facilities by Musa and Adewale revealed that

only 30% met the NUC’s recommended space allocation of 4.5 square meters per student in

lecture halls, with most averaging 2.1 square meters – a density comparable to crowded

marketplaces. This spatial crunch isn’t just uncomfortable; it stifles innovation. At the

University of Ibadan, postgraduate students in a 2021 survey reported that cramped labs

forced them to schedule equipment use in shifts, delaying experiments by weeks (Okoro &

Eze, 2021).

10
Design expectations for postgraduate facilities extend beyond square footage. The NBTE’s

Guidelines for Technical Education Infrastructure (2021) stress the need for soundproofed

seminar rooms, uninterrupted power supply, and ergonomic furniture to support extended

research sessions. Yet, a study of six federal polytechnics, including Federal Polytechnic

Nasarawa (FPN), found that 90% of postgraduate classrooms lacked acoustic insulation,

amplifying distractions from nearby workshops or traffic (Ibrahim et al., 2022). Power

reliability is another Achilles’ heel. While Covenant University’s postgraduate school uses

solar-hybrid systems to maintain 24/7 electricity (Babalola & Ajayi, 2023), most public

institutions rely on diesel generators that consume 40% of their operational budgets (Nigerian

Ministry of Education, 2023). These disparities highlight a systemic issue: postgraduate

infrastructure is often retrofitted from undergraduate facilities rather than purpose-built,

leading to compromised functionality.

Water and sanitation infrastructure, a cornerstone of any functional academic space, is

particularly neglected. The University of Maiduguri’s postgraduate hostel, constructed in

2018, initially included rainwater harvesting gutters, but a 2022 evaluation found them

disconnected and repurposed as laundry lines due to tank leaks (Mohammed & Aliyu, 2022).

This reflects a broader trend where sustainability features are sacrificed during budget cuts.

Even newer projects falter; the 2021 postgraduate complex at Ahmadu Bello University

prioritized aesthetic glass facades over passive cooling, resulting in a 35% increase in air

conditioning costs (Dangana, 2022). Such missteps underscore a disconnect between

architectural trends and climatic realities.

Efforts to bridge this gap remain fragmented. The Nigerian Institute of Architects’ 2020 report

Reimagining Academic Spaces proposed modular designs for postgraduate schools, allowing

11
incremental upgrades as funding permits (NIA, 2020). Pilot projects at Obafemi Awolowo

University tested this approach, using prefabricated labs that reduced construction costs by

25%. However, the modules lacked integration with water harvesting systems, perpetuating

reliance on municipal supplies (Adeyinka & Olayiwola, 2021). These case studies reveal a

critical oversight: postgraduate facilities are rarely designed as holistic ecosystems where

energy, water, and spatial efficiency reinforce one another.

2.2.2 Understanding water harvesting systems

Water harvesting systems are engineered to capture, store, and redistribute precipitation,

transforming rainfall from a seasonal nuisance into a year-round resource. At its simplest,

these systems fall into two categories: rooftop harvesting, which channels rainwater via gutters

into storage tanks, and surface runoff harvesting, which directs stormwater from paved areas

into recharge pits or reservoirs (Olajuyigbe & Rotowa, 2020). Emerging hybrid models, like

Singapore’s “Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters” program, combine both approaches, using

green roofs to slow runoff and underground tanks with filtration systems to ensure potable

quality (PUB Singapore, 2022). Functionality varies by climate – regions like Nasarawa State,

with its sharp wet-dry seasonal divide, require large storage capacities to bridge six-month dry

spells, whereas humid areas prioritize filtration to combat contamination (Olaniran et al.,

2021).

Recent advancements focus on decentralizing these systems. A 2023 study in Nairobi’s slum

schools tested modular “water cubes” – stackable, UV-resistant polyethylene tanks that

occupy minimal space – and found they reduced water costs by 55% compared to centralized

piping (Mwangi et al., 2023). Similarly, India’s “Jal Shakti Abhiyan” campaign retrofitted

1,000 rural schools with ferrocement tanks, which use locally sourced sand and wire mesh to
12
cut construction costs by 40% (Sharma & Reddy, 2021). However, these innovations often

overlook maintenance realities. For example, a project in Ghana’s Tamale Technical

University used first-flush diverters to improve water quality but failed to train staff on

cleaning the mechanisms, leading to clogging within a year (Abdulai & Mensah, 2022).

Technical barriers persist even in well-funded projects. In Lagos, a 2021 pilot at the

University of Lagos installed smart sensors to monitor tank levels and automate pump

systems. While the technology reduced spillage during heavy rains, frequent power outages

rendered the sensors useless for weeks, forcing manual overrides (Adeyemo & Bello, 2022).

This highlights a critical gap in the literature: most studies assume stable electricity, a rarity in

Nigerian institutions. Conversely, low-tech solutions thrive in resource-limited settings.

Researchers in Benin City demonstrated that simple mesh filters made from recycled mosquito

nets could reduce sediment in harvested water by 80%, outperforming expensive ceramic

filters (Ediae & Ogbebor, 2023).

The scalability of water harvesting also depends on community engagement – a factor often

sidelined in technical studies. A participatory action research project in Malawi’s Mzuzu

University involved students in designing and maintaining a campus-wide system, which

improved long-term functionality by 70% compared to top-down implementations (Phiri &

Kaunda, 2020). Similarly, a 2022 Nigerian study found that institutions with student-led

“water clubs” had higher system retention rates, as peer monitoring reduced vandalism and

neglect (Uchegbu & Okonta, 2022). These insights challenge the prevailing focus on

hardware, urging a shift toward socio-technical systems that blend engineering with

behavioral science.

13
2.2.3 Integration of sustainable features in educational infrastructure

The push to embed sustainability into educational infrastructure stems from a growing

recognition that schools must model the ecological stewardship they teach. Global frameworks

like the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) explicitly link quality education (SDG

4) with clean water access (SDG 6), urging institutions to adopt features like rainwater

harvesting, solar energy, and energy-efficient lighting (UNESCO, 2021). In Nigeria, this

alignment is increasingly urgent. With 43% of tertiary institutions facing water scarcity

(Nwankwo & Eze, 2023), schools like Alex Ekwueme Federal University have turned to

integrated designs, blending rainwater catchment with wastewater recycling for irrigation – a

system that cut municipal water use by 50% within two years (Okeke et al., 2022). Such

projects underscore a broader trend: sustainable features are no longer optional add-ons but

core components of functional academic spaces.

The “how” of integration often hinges on retrofitting versus new builds. A 2023 study of

Kenya’s Technical University of Mombasa compared both approaches. Retrofitting existing

hostels with gutters and storage tanks cost 30% less than constructing new eco-friendly blocks

but achieved only half the water savings due to incompatible roof slopes (Mugo & Kariuki,

2023). Conversely, Ghana’s University of Energy and Natural Resources designed its

postgraduate complex from scratch with angled roofs optimized for rainwater collection,

achieving 80% self-sufficiency during rainy seasons (Ansah & Owusu, 2021). These divergent

outcomes highlight a key challenge: sustainable integration demands context-specific

strategies, not one-size-fits-all blueprints.

Economic incentives also drive adoption. At Lagos State University, a 2021 solar-powered

water harvesting project reduced annual utility bills by ₦12 million, redirecting funds to
14
research grants (Akinola & Adebayo, 2022). Similarly, South Africa’s Stellenbosch University

reported a 15-year payback period for its green infrastructure investments, appealing to

fiscally cautious administrators (Van Niekerk & Booysen, 2023). However, upfront costs

remain a barrier. A survey of 20 Nigerian architects found that 75% consider sustainable

features “prohibitively expensive” for public institutions, despite lifecycle cost savings (Aliu

et al., 2023). This perception persists due to fragmented policy support. While Rwanda

mandates rainwater systems for all new schools (Ministry of Education Rwanda, 2022),

Nigeria’s National Water Policy (2020) offers vague recommendations without funding

mechanisms, leaving institutions to navigate implementation alone.

Beyond economics, sustainable infrastructure serves pedagogical ends. Uganda’s Makerere

University redesigned its engineering labs to include transparent rainwater pipes and real-time

usage dashboards, transforming the building into a teaching tool (Nabukenya & Katono,

2022). Students now analyze water flow rates as part of coursework, merging theory with

hands-on practice. This approach aligns with “hidden curriculum” theory, which posits that

physical environments subtly shape attitudes and behaviors (Lackney, 2019). Yet, few studies

explore how sustainable features influence student engagement or environmental literacy – a

gap this research begins to fill by proposing participatory design workshops at FPN.

2.3 Theoretical Framework

2.3.1 Sustainable development theory

Sustainable Development Theory, formalized in the 1987 Brundtland Report as “development

that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to
15
meet their own needs,” provides a foundational lens for understanding the integration of water

harvesting systems in institutional infrastructure (World Commission on Environment and

Development, 1987). While the theory’s principles are broad, contemporary scholars have

refined its application to urban planning and architecture, emphasizing resource circularity and

intergenerational equity (Holden et al., 2023). In the context of educational institutions like

Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa (FPN), this theory challenges designers to view water not as a

disposable commodity but as a cyclical resource that must be conserved, reused, and managed

to ensure long-term campus resilience. Recent critiques, however, argue that the Brundtland

framework’s vagueness allows institutions to adopt superficial “greenwashing” tactics –

installing token rainwater tanks without systemic changes – rather than holistic sustainability

(Benson & Craig, 2023). This tension between symbolic gestures and substantive action is

particularly acute in developing nations, where budget constraints often prioritize immediate

functionality over future-proofing.

The theory’s relevance to water harvesting in postgraduate schools becomes clear through its

emphasis on systems thinking. For instance, Málovics et al. (2021) reconceptualize sustainable

development as a nested system where ecological limits dictate socio-technical solutions.

Applying this to FPN, rainwater harvesting isn’t just about storing water; it’s about

redesigning the campus hydrology to mimic natural watersheds. Green roofs could slow

stormwater runoff, permeable pavements could enhance groundwater recharge, and storage

tanks could buffer seasonal shortages – all aligning with SDG 6 (clean water) and SDG 11

(sustainable cities). A 2023 study of Ethiopian universities demonstrated this approach,

showing that integrating water harvesting with landscape design reduced flood risks by 40%

while creating shaded outdoor study areas (Tesfaye & Abera, 2023). Such multi-functional

16
outcomes epitomize sustainable development’s core tenet: harmonizing human needs with

ecological boundaries.

Critics, however, highlight the theory’s blind spots. Sovacool et al. (2022) argue that

sustainable development often sidelines procedural justice – the inclusion of marginalized

voices in planning. In Nigeria, where top-down decision-making dominates institutional

projects, this critique resonates. A 2021 project at Bayero University Kano installed rooftop

harvesting systems without consulting maintenance staff, leading to system failures when

leaves clogged gutters (Musa et al., 2021). Similarly, Agyeman’s (2020) concept of just

sustainabilities insists that equity must be central to environmental solutions. For FPN, this

means involving students, cleaners, and local artisans in the design process to ensure the

system is socially and technically maintainable.

Recent advancements have also linked sustainable development to resilience theory, which

focuses on systems’ capacity to adapt to shocks like droughts or floods (Sharifi, 2023). FPN’s

location in Nasarawa State, which experienced a 30% drop in annual rainfall between 2015

and 2022 (NIMET, 2023), makes this intersection critical. Resilience-oriented water

harvesting would prioritize modular tanks that can be expanded during droughts and

decentralized systems that prevent total collapse if one component fails. Kenya’s Rift Valley

Technical Institute offers a model: its campus uses interconnected but independent rainwater

tanks for each hostel block, ensuring that a leak in one doesn’t drain the entire network

(Kiptoo et al., 2022).

The theory’s evolution also addresses economic viability. Traditional cost-benefit analyses

often overlook externality pricing, such as the long-term savings from reduced groundwater

depletion. A 2024 study redefined rainwater harvesting ROI by factoring in Nigeria’s

found that institutional systems pay for themselves within seven years (Alabi & Ojo, 2024).

This recalibration aligns with Stoddart’s (2023) sustainable economics framework, which

argues that upfront investments in resilience avert future crises that are costlier to mitigate.

Ultimately, Sustainable Development Theory doesn’t just justify water harvesting – it

demands it. By framing FPN’s project as a microcosm of Nigeria’s broader water challenges,

the theory elevates the design from a technical retrofit to a prototype for national policy. As

Nasarawa State grapples with aquifer depletion and erratic rainfall, the campus becomes a

living lab where sustainable development transitions from rhetoric to practice.

2.3.2 Green building design theory

Green Building Design Theory redefines architecture as a dialogue between human needs and

ecological systems, advocating for structures that minimize environmental harm while

maximizing resource efficiency. Rooted in principles like energy conservation, material

circularity, and water stewardship, this theory gained momentum with frameworks such as

LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and BREEAM (Building Research

Establishment Environmental Assessment Method). However, its application in developing

nations like Nigeria often diverges from Western models due to climatic and socioeconomic

realities. For instance, while LEED prioritizes high-tech solutions like solar panels and smart

grids, scholars like Kibert (2020) argue that tropical regions should emphasize passive design

strategies – natural ventilation, daylight optimization, and rainwater harvesting – to reduce

reliance on energy-intensive systems. This recalibration is critical for Federal Polytechnic

Nasarawa (FPN), where erratic power supply renders advanced technologies impractical.

18
Recent case studies illustrate how green building principles adapt to local contexts. In

Indonesia’s Universitas Gadjah Mada, architects used biomimicry to design lecture halls with

overhanging roofs that mimic forest canopies, channeling rainwater into cascading garden

terraces (Nguyen & Tapanaki, 2022). This approach reduced stormwater runoff by 60% while

creating microclimates that lowered indoor temperatures. Similarly, Nigeria’s Covenant

University integrated modular green walls into its postgraduate library, which not only filtered

airborne pollutants but also directed condensation into a greywater system for toilet flushing

(Ogunmakinde et al., 2021). These projects highlight a key tenet of the theory: sustainability

isn’t about adding features but embedding ecological logic into a building’s DNA.

Economic barriers, however, persist. A 2023 survey of Nigerian architects found that 68%

associate green building with inflated costs, overlooking lifecycle savings (Aliu & Adeyemi,

2023). For example, Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology

(KNUST) spent 20% more upfront on rainwater-harvesting-compatible roofing but slashed

water expenses by 45% annually, breaking even within five years (Amoako & Cobbinah,

2022). Such data challenges the myth of prohibitive costs, yet perception gaps linger. Policy

inertia exacerbates this; unlike Rwanda’s Green Building Minimum Compliance System

(2021), which mandates rainwater infrastructure for schools, Nigeria’s green building

guidelines remain advisory, stalling widespread adoption (Federal Ministry of Environment,

2020).

The theory’s strength lies in its scalability. Small interventions, like FPN’s proposed use of

laterite-coated storage tanks – a material abundant in Nasarawa State – can achieve significant

impacts without high-tech imports. Researchers in Mali validated this approach, showing that

laterite’s natural filtration properties reduce waterborne pathogens by 70%, rivaling expensive

19
ceramic filters (Diallo et al., 2023). By aligning green building with indigenous knowledge

and materials, institutions can bypass dependency on foreign solutions. Ultimately, Green

Building Design Theory isn’t a rigid checklist but a mindset – one that FPN’s project

embodies by treating rainwater not as waste to drain but as a resource to harvest, filter, and

celebrate.

2.3.3 Theory of educational environment design

Educational environments are not passive backdrops but active participants in shaping

learning experiences, a premise central to the Theory of Educational Environment Design.

Pioneered by Lackney (2014), this theory posits that spatial layouts, material choices, and

sensory elements (light, acoustics, airflow) directly influence cognitive engagement,

collaboration, and environmental consciousness. For postgraduate schools, which demand

intensive research and critical thinking, the theory emphasizes flexibility (adaptable spaces for

solo and group work), stimulation (aesthetic and functional designs that inspire innovation),

and sustainability (visible eco-features that normalize resource stewardship). A 2023 study of

Brazilian postgraduate facilities demonstrated this by redesigning labs with movable partitions

and indoor green walls, which increased interdisciplinary collaboration by 35% and self-

reported environmental awareness by 50% (Ferreira & Lima, 2023). These findings align with

neuroarchitecture research showing that natural materials and daylight boost serotonin levels,

enhancing focus and creativity (Edelstein & Macagno, 2022).

However, Nigerian postgraduate facilities often undermine these principles. A 2022 audit of

FPN’s existing infrastructure revealed rigid, box-like classrooms with poor ventilation and no

visible sustainability features – a design ethos stuck in the 1980s (Musa & Adewale, 2022).

This misalignment has tangible consequences. In a survey of 200 Nigerian postgraduate

extended research (Nwankwo & Okeke, 2023). Contrast this with Rwanda’s African

Leadership University, where lecture halls feature transparent rainwater pipes and real-time

energy dashboards, turning infrastructure into interactive learning tools (Uwimana & Kagabo,

2021). Such designs operationalize the theory’s assertion that environments should “teach by

example,” fostering ecological literacy through daily exposure.

A critical gap in applying this theory lies in its Global North bias. Most frameworks assume

reliable electricity, climate control, and maintenance budgets – conditions absent in many

Nigerian institutions. For instance, the theory’s emphasis on “biophilic design” (integrating

nature) often presumes access to lush greenery, but in arid regions like Nasarawa, this could

translate to drought-resistant landscaping paired with rainwater-fed gardens. A 2023 pilot at

Sokoto State University tested this adaptation, using harvested water to sustain native shrubs

around postgraduate blocks, which reduced indoor temperatures by 4°C and increased student

foot traffic in outdoor study areas (Bello & Shehu, 2023). This pragmatic tweak shows how

the theory must evolve to address climatic and resource realities.

The theory also underplays participatory design – involving end-users in planning. While

Western models prioritize expert-led processes, a 2022 Nigerian study found that postgraduate

students’ input on facility layouts led to 40% higher satisfaction with communal spaces

(Adeyemi & Alabi, 2022). For FPN’s water harvesting project, this suggests engaging students

in mapping gutter routes or selecting tank locations, transforming them from passive users to

co-designers. Such an approach not only improves functionality but also embeds a sense of

ownership, critical for maintaining systems long-term. By bridging the Theory of Educational

21
Environment Design with localized, participatory practices, FPN’s project can redefine

postgraduate spaces as catalysts for both academic and ecological transformation.

2.4 Summary of the Chapter

Existing research validates rainwater harvesting’s potential but lacks actionable frameworks

for Nigerian postgraduate schools. While global case studies emphasize technical solutions,

local studies overlook design integration and stakeholder training. This gap positions FPN’s

project as both a practical response to water scarcity and a testbed for redefining sustainable

academic architecture in resource-constrained settings.

22
23