DISCUSS AND ANSWER:
Sharid Objio
Marcial Gamundi
Alejandro Morel
Nataly Michelle
1. Simon Sinek begins his talk with questions: Do you ever wonder why Apple® is so
innovative or why Martin Luther King became the leader of the Civil Rights
movement? Who can you think of who is a somewhat surprising leader in your
university or community or the world? Who does not necessarily look or act the part,
yet has followers?
Miriam Laureano, because the disposition helps the students the way in which she leads the
business administration school and its processes.
2. Sinek says that all great, inspiring leaders think, act and communicate in the same
way, which is the complete opposite to everyone else. Do you agree with his assessment?
Can you think of an exception to it - a leader who thinks the same as conventional
thought in his/her arena or one who thinks differently from other leaders?
While Simon Sinek suggests all great leaders share a specific thinking, acting, and
communicating style, the reality is likely more nuanced. His Golden Circle emphasizes
starting with "why" (purpose), a potentially universal element, but diverse contexts and
leaders demand adaptability. Counterexamples like Mandela and Churchill showcase
different approaches to successful leadership. Perhaps great leaders think similarly but adapt
their outward communication ("act" and "communicate") strategically. While Sinek's model
offers valuable insights, effective leadership likely thrives on individualized approaches and
adapting to specific contexts.
3. The Golden Circle Sinek describes has three concentric rings He says that every
business knows its outer ring - the "what" - that is does. What is your what? If someone
described what you do, what would it be?
What: Students are individuals engaged in learning and acquiring knowledge, typically in an
educational setting.
How: They engage with teachers, resources, and experiences to gain knowledge and develop
skills.
Why: Students seek education to expand their minds, improve their future prospects, and
make meaningful contributions to society.
4. The middle ring is the "how" - the process - and Sinek says that some businesses
know this. Thin k about you r role as a student. What is the how, the process, of you r
role? How do you actually get the job done? Can you think of at least three processes in
place that students need to accomplish their
"what?"
Activate learning through engagement, practice and application through regular work and real
life connections, efficient time management, clear organization etc.
5. The inner, smallest ring of the Golden Circle is the why, what Sinek describes as you
r" purpose, cause, or belief." He says that this is the one that few know, and it's not just
profit. The educational equivalent of profit is a grade. If were move that as a "why,"
then what is a why for you with regard to school? If there were no grades, what would
lure you to education?
If there were no grades, my "why" for education would still be the same: to inspire curiosity,
foster critical thinking, and empower individuals to reach their full potential. Grades can be
motivators, but they are not the essence of learning. The true allure of education, for me, lies
in the opportunity to facilitate personal growth, spark a love for learning, and equip
individuals with the skills and knowledge to navigate the world effectively.
6. According to Sinek, most businesses go from the outside in, whereas inspired leaders
go from the inside out (they start with their "why"). What makes this important? What
does it matter if you start with what or start with why?
According to Sinek successful leaders prioritize their why starting with the why fosters
emotional connections guides desition making motivates everyone involved focusing on how
or what can lead to losing sight of the bigger picture.
8. In what way do you think Sinek's ideas apply to relationships? Is it important to
consider why you enter a relationship with someone, rather than simple attraction?
What impact would it have on relationships (not just romantic ones) if the people in the
relationship had different whys?
Sink's ideas, as articulated by Simon Sinek, emphasize the importance of understanding the
underlying motivations and purposes behind actions. When applied to relationships, this
perspective suggests that it's crucial to consider not only the superficial attraction but also the
deeper reasons for entering a relationship with someone. Understanding why you're drawn to
someone beyond mere physical attraction can lead to more meaningful and fulfilling
connections.
If individuals in a relationship have different underlying motivations or "whys," it can lead to
misunderstandings, conflicts, and ultimately, dissatisfaction. For example, if one person is
seeking companionship and emotional support while the other is primarily interested in
financial stability or social status, their goals and expectations may clash, causing strain on
the relationship. Clear communication and alignment of values can help mitigate these
challenges, but differing motivations can still create tensions that may be difficult to resolve.
