0 Example 2. As part of an investigation into the collapse of the roof of a building, the testing laboratory is given all the available bolts that connected the steel structure at 3 different positions on the roof. The forces required to shear each of these bolts (coded values) are as follows: Position 1 | 90 | 82} 79} 98 | 83 | 91 Position 1 | 105 | 89 | 93 | 104 | 89 | 95 | 86 Position 1 | -83 | 89 | 80] 94 Perform an analysis of variance to test at the 0.05 level of significant whether the differences among the sample means at the 3 positions are significance.Solution: Null Hypothesi: among the sample Means, Alternate Hypothesis Ay: sample means, Let we IS Ho : There j Total number of obs Tal atu ofa oe A = 17 servations, 7 Comrection Factor, 7? _ (0? ~° NO T7 =0 Total sum of squares TSS = s CrP Peay as = 29944734 166-9 =938 Sum of squares between columns SSC = (EX) | (EX)? | (Exp fi ig ie > = 217? On)? ryt BT etierg ~0 = 234.45 Sum of squares between error SSE = TSS ssc = 938 — 234.45 = 103.55 ANOVA Table to Calculate F-rato: Fe Tabi ee || Sat antl Mean sum | Variance Vale f 2 Varianed 91°"! Freedom of Squares ; Msc= peween| ssc =|C-1 | 5495 Column 23445 | =2 | =—— = 117.205 | =2' SSE Boor |3.3 Sis = “N= 7o3.ss | 17-3] _ 70355 _ 5 ih Ts =|N-1 - Total {938 "| =16 Condition Always F>1 Conclusion: Since calculate value of Fe < table value of Fe, 0 we accept Ho, Therefore there is no significance difference among the sample means. Oo Example 3. In order to determine whether there is significant difference in the durability 3 makes of computers, sample of size 5 are selected each make and the frequency of repair during the first year of purchase is observed. The results are as follows: A[s|[ 6] 38 Makes: B 8 10 ul c 7 3 5 In view of the above data, what conclusion can you draw? ution; Null Hypothesis Ho : There is no significance difference wong the computer : Hypothesis H; « There is a significance difference among the_ .. ve Le a i < Table Fe 125 206 < 591, So, wo ace PO pero is 10 signi > Table Fr ies there are sian dies nt difference between column 35 > 349, $0, we Pp sx? g+zxz-D oe pygee HEX EXT + EME Sp 4S Tp 6 + 1586 + S612-+ 2753 ~ 2051 4 randomised block design ‘oar replicatlons. The plot yield In pounds are as follows : ; ATe]e]S]Ala8 BTS c]sjals]{elelc|s Bi7{B}]6}clwolals the experimental yield and state your con TAU Np 2 ‘Suep 1: SSE = TSS -SSC-SSR "Block Total = STN ~ 161350 ~ 2623495 = 99453 eo] Se] ot GETS Sip: ANOVA : eri varieties Sane Sam a a | a | at 6 | 9 | 2 | | 36 | 36 | a Variation | squares Ical FI w | 9 | 3 | o | 2 | | a Isc IMSE> MSC [4 [tHe | 9 | 77_| 200 | 98 significant difference between column means as well as It There is significant difference between columa means of the row means, PIN ew 1-) 2:7 may LE oa? errs S18 © oxdeexterxieex?-5 $149 4.774200 198 = 588 = 36xe axa? , EX, Exo ae a a at Sa y= Number of elements in guy ot 0 4 = ayes! ew! ew eu _F gem sep 6:52 “y N Na N me pele ‘Ny = Number of elements in cag, =/36-18-8.=.10 sup 1: SSE =-TS5—SSC~ SSR Step 8 : ANOVA + Source | Sum a | of pat ‘Variation | squares £359 < 4.16. So, we accept Hy s for this ease difference between blocks, gris As By C; D.of 8 fertiliser are tested in a randomized block plication. The plot yields in pounds are as z D@ Jaetoeen |SSC=18 fo—1 Total Blocks j=4-1-3 | varieties | XI | X3 |X} | XG JBeoween |ssr=8.|p—1 Varieties j=3-1=2 \-1y¢-1) 00 Tan6 | 88 | 92 | 98 | BS fe between column means as well as fen column means oF the rowep 88 0 EE = 868, ve «sum’of Sa08"28 sup gS oma “i =x g+ EN + EXT exo, Ni rT N veo 968 +865 — 3481 = 157 en columns (SSC) EX, XS MM ON Number of elements in i N Ms in cach ie. a 34 < BBL. So, we accept Hp for this case. ficant difference between blocks. ©, 43.4 > 3.86. So, we reject Hy for this case. ore are significant differences in the vaites, 2 woe, Or , OM on sa, (OP OY OO _ 3461 A a eas Fenny sta erst he sora wits produ pe ay rs rant workers, using 4 dilleent types of machines, ves berveen rows (SSR) Oey aaeent oo a types of machines, step 6; Sum of S18 - * 3 4 ‘Machine type ew? ev ,e¥y Evo" A Bc Se TN D Ny Namber of elements in each Be Ea, Mle 296 2 4 Ds = 6 0 2 6 62, 381 = 14s Workers 3 : 4 B 8 6 33 sup 1586 = T9580 S9R_ = 157 25— MAS © 0 4 =P 5 8 2 8 ® sep 8 : ANOVA ‘Test whether the five men differ with respect to mean productivity and fest whether the mean productivity is the same for the four diferent Se | Sam rachine types. TAU, Mid 2006, N/D 2007, MU 2013} elt t 2m, AM 201) arian] squares wee | ESC Je azact 49 from the given values we et the coded data es 25 | 4-1 MSE. | ‘Machine Type = } Fe= Msc % 1% Te LiL 7 | Xs xe | xt “083 -2 7 —4 49 16 =134>1 of} 2] 3 fa] sf] o fu} 9 ro fT MSR> MSE 4 4 -3 | -4 | 36 we | 16 | 6 a3 afel-sfo}o]e|[*]* also f—-als]«f4}e|? 3a Paar freao] rer 38 | 6 | 8P 2421 icant difference between column means as well as nt difference between column means or the rowwey je. there are significant dilferencee w s+~ Example 2.4.8 Analyze the variance in the latin square of yields Q, R, S denote the different methods of cultivation. [siz ) Prt | Ris | o122 | } Q124 P120 R121wh the different methods of culti ntly different yields, [A.U. N/D 2003, M/J 2006, N/D 2012][A.U N/D 2019 R-17] esa signi ract 120 weeet 4 ib ge PSTET FITTEST STS o/4{/R}3]/Pepl2]s ts plo/Q{-a}sftofR]{a R/2/{S}3/ofi[Ppl2 X | Xs | Xa | Tota | x? | x? | x} | XG 1 3 2 8 4 1 9 4 3 2 5 4 16 9 4 Po) -1 {0 1 0 0;i1tof2 3 a 2 8 4 9 1 + 6 | 6 [ 0 | t=30 | 24 | 20 [4 [3 ‘There is no significant difference between rows, columns and treatments. ‘There is significant difference between rows or columns or treatments. 2 2 246 © Step2:T = 30 step 3: = QD = s62s 2 exteEx}+Exg+Exy-— = 24 + 20 + 14 + 34 - 56.25 = 35.75 xy , x, EX! , e xy? N; Ni N Ny N N, + Number of elements in each column 2 2 2. a ea a OY — 5625 = 275 4 4 4 4 2%" ery, e ys? @Y Np Np No Ny N N, > Number of elements in each row. eo a? © & a qtr tg tg 7 5625. = 24.752 ssk the oem ats in the OF 2 2 oF, ar a lad gsc - SSR - SSK Step 8: SSE = TSS - 3815 = 215 = AIS mA Step 9: ANOVA = Source | Sum Variance , of of af. Mean square ratio Variation| squares: [Cal F] Between ssc MSC > MSE columns | =2.75 Fe = MSC}! MSE, 0.67 = '137>1 MSR>MSE Error SSE =4 k~1)(K-2) = 2) = 6 MSE SSE “En ->| 4 6 = 067\ sign of Experiments variable trial was conducted on wheat yj Co ign. The plan of the experiment and th 2.53 th 4 varieties in a Latin Square © Per plot yield are given below: ) ‘Analyse data and interpret the result, [AU * (AU AM 2017 R-13][A.U N/D 29; NS solution + Subtract 20 from all the items, X3 X4 | Total 2 M/S 2012) [A.U N/D 2016 R-13] 19 R-13][A.U N/D 2022 (R-21)] Y, | Xi | X2 k x | 3 [xg X x 3 0 0 8 | 0 | ] -1 1 =F =—3 1 1 4 uy we 3 8 | a0 | a | ag Argel og i 0 aS | 7 8 [70 aoa thas | x4 | at HT [r= =2) 36 a6 aap - a eee ae | There is no significant difference between rows, columns and treatments. | f There is significant difference between rows or columns or E treatments. Slep1:N = 16 ‘Sep 2:T = 12 i je P_ (-ny Pry = Gas Ht ; Step 4: Tss ~ 2X +E +E +Exg-T i 36+464+11+29-9 = 123 . p , Ex Pex Step 5; ssc 2X)" Ex)? XY XY 2 rl Ng N,N ON N, + Number of elements in each column 22.54 vy 2 2 ey), 9) (ZY3)° (2 Ya) qe St “NOW Step 6: SSR = Ny N, > Number of eletients' ih: (3p) Cae Gp nah Ge ta 4 4 4 SSK = "TSS — SSC ~ SSR - SSK Step 8: SSE = 113-75 - 465-485 = 105 Step 9: ANOVA : Variance () Source 7 \ of of ag, |Mean square| ratio Mali Variation] squares {Cal F] Between | SSC=7.5 IMSC > MSE Columns fuse se msc’ |" © ore © Ms ese Teaursagie = 1.43>1|. IMSR> MSE Msa Between | SSA=465 K—1 Si Rows MSR = Fa = ySE = 886>1 Between | SSK=485 ‘SSK_|MSK’ ‘SSE=105 [K1K=2y = (32) |___SSE =6 (K=1(K=2) 105 6 = 1.75