Cell Signaling and Transduction Mechanisms
Cell Signaling and Transduction Mechanisms
INTO ANOTHER
In its broadest context, cell signaling involves the
transduction of some event into another event.
In sensory transduction, a sensory cell is exposed to
some external signal that is transduced to produce a
nervous signal, the action potential. As we will see
later in Chapter 3.2, this action potential can move
along cell membranes to rapidly convey the signal,
the action potential, to remote parts of the sensory
neuron. The action potential is then transduced to
release neurotransmitter at the synapse—the gap
between one neuron and another. The neurotransmit-
ter is then transduced to form the response of the
postsynaptic cell, the one on the other side of the
synapse. In the case of cutaneous (skin) senses, the
original sensory signal is mechanical—a push or a
pull on the nerves in the skin. The mechanical signal
is transduced to an electrical signal, and the electrical
signal is then transduced to a chemical signal.
This simple series of events illustrates the use of
mechanical, electrical, and chemical signals in the
body (see Figure 2.8.1).
Action potential
Mechanical stimulus
The final response can be
a mechanical, chemical, or
electrical response
FIGURE 2.8.1 Transduction of signals. Some kinds of sensory cells can transduce mechanical stimuli to electrical signals which can be conveyed along
their surface for rapid spatial relay of the signal. At the end of the cell, the electrical signal is transduced to a chemical signal to convey the signal
across the gap between the cells. The postsynaptic cell transduces this chemical signal back to an electrical signal.
SIGNALS ELICIT A VARIETY OF
CLASSES OF CELLULAR RESPONSES
Intra- and intercellular signals begin a cascade of events
that eventually changes cell behavior. The response of
cells to signaling events includes altered:
G ion transport;
G metabolism;
G gene expression or differentiation;
G shape, movement, or force production;
G cell growth or cell division;
G apoptosis or programmed cell death.
Barbiturates and γ-aminobutyric acid stimulate GABA-activated ion-channel- relief of anxiety; sedation
benzodiazepines (GABA) coupled receptors
(Valium and Ambien)
Morphine and heroin endorphins and stimulate G-protein-coupled opiate analgesia (relief of pain); euphoria
enkephalins receptors
3
Increased cytoplasmic [Ca2+] binds to
Ca sites on target proteins
Ca2+
VDCC
Synaptotagmin 4D
... directly activating some enzymes
Ca2+
4A RyR1 PKC
... causing stimulus-secretion Ca2+
coupling in neurons or most CSQ
Calmodulin Ca2+
endocrine cells Ca2+
Ca2+
TnC Ca2+
MLCK
Ca2+
4B Ca2+
... activating contraction in muscle
cells Ca2+
Ca 2+
Inactive Active
4C... binding to calmodulin, activating
a variety of enzymes
FIGURE 2.8.3 Electrically coupled calcium signaling. Depolarization of the cell membrane opens a calcium channel that lets Ca21 into the cell. At rest,
the cytoplasmic [Ca21] is very low. Upon stimulation, influx of Ca21 raises the [Ca21] enough for Ca21 to bind to Ca21-binding sites on specific
proteins. Ca21 binding to synaptotagmin causes fusion of secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane. Binding to troponin C (TnC) activates force in
skeletal or cardiac muscle. Ca21 binding to calmodulin activates a number of enzymes such as MLCK (myosin light chain kinase) involved in smooth
muscle contraction. In other cases, Ca21 directly activates some enzymes; PKC is shown. RyR1 is the ryanodine receptor on the endoplasmic reticulum
membrane; CSQ is calsequestrin, a calcium-binding protein in the lumen of some ER membranes.
Agonists
(e.g. glutamate, ATP)
Depolarisation
Ca2+
ATP PMCA
Sto
NCX
er
IP3
ep Ca2+
d
le Na+
ti
Agonists NAADP
on
sig
nal
GPCRs
ATP
TPC1/2
IP3R Ca RyR SERCA
sensor Ca2+
Ca2+ H+
Plasma membrane
Fig. 4.1 Regulation of intracellular calcium. The main routes of transfer of Ca2+ into, and out of, the cytosol, endoplasmic reticulum
(ER) and lysosomal structures are shown for a typical cell (see text for details). Black arrows: routes into the cytosol. Blue arrows: routes
out of the cytosol. Red arrows: regulatory mechanisms. The state of the ER store of Ca2+ is monitored by the sensor protein Stim1, which
interacts directly with the store-operated calcium channel (SOC) to promote Ca2+ entry when the ER store is depleted. Normally, [Ca2+]i is
regulated to about 10−7 mol/L in a ‘resting’ cell. Mitochondria (not shown) also function as Ca2+ storage organelles but release Ca2+ only
under pathological conditions, such as ischaemia (see pp. 55–56). There is recent evidence for a lysosomal store of Ca2+, activated by the
second messenger nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) through a two-pore domain calcium channel (TPC). GPCR, G
protein–coupled receptor; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; IP3R, inositol trisphosphate receptor; LGC, ligand-gated cation channel; NCX,
Na+–Ca2+ exchange transporter; PMCA, plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase; RyR, ryanodine receptor; SERCA, sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic
reticulum ATPase; VGCC, voltage-gated calcium channel.
1. Receptors largely determine the quantitative relations
between dose or concentration of drug and pharmacologic
effects. The receptor’s affinity for binding a drug determines the
concentration of drug required to form a significant number of
drug-receptor complexes, and the total number of receptors
may limit the maximal effect a drug may produce.
2. Receptors are responsible for selectivity of drug action.
The molecular size, shape, and electrical charge of a drug
determine whether—and with what affinity—it will bind to
a particular receptor among the vast array of chemically dif-
ferent binding sites available in a cell, tissue, or patient.
Accordingly, changes in the chemical structure of a drug can
dramatically increase or decrease a new drug’s affinities for
different classes of receptors, with resulting alterations in
therapeutic and toxic effects.
3. Receptors bring about the actions of pharmacologic
agonists and antagonists.
% Maximal Response
A B
100 100
50 50
EC50 EC50
0 0
[A] Log [A]
Figure 3–2 Graded responses (y axis as a percentage of maximal response) expressed as a function of the concentra-tion of drug A present at the
receptor. The hyperbolic shape of the curve in panel A becomes sigmoid when plotted semi-logarithmically, as in panel B. The concentration of
drug that produces 50% of the maximal response quantifi es drug activity and is referred to as the EC50 (effective concentration for 50%
response). The range of concentrations needed to fully depict the dose-response relationship (∼3 log 10 [10] units) is too wide to be useful in
the linear for-mat of Figure 3–2 A; thus, most dose-response curves use log [Drug] on the x axis, as in Figure 3–2 B. Dose-response curves
presented in this way are sigmoidal in shape and have 3 properties: threshold, slope, and maximal asymptote. These 3 parameters quantitate
the activity of the drug.
Dose-response data are often presented as a plot of the drug effect (ordinate) against the logarithm of the
dose or concentration (abscissa), transforming the hyperbolic curve of Figure 2–1 into a sigmoid curve with a
linear midportion (eg, Figure 2–2). This transformation is convenient because it expands the scale of the
concentration axis at low concentrations (where the effect is changing rapidly) and compresses it at high
concentrations (where the effect is changing slowly), but otherwise has no biologic or pharmacologic
significance.
• A drug is called an agonist when binding to the receptor results in a
response.
• A drug is called an antagonist when binding to the receptor is not
associated with a response; the drug has an effect only by preventing
an agonist from binding to the receptor.
• Occupancy: The proportion of receptors to which a drug is
bound.
• Affinity is the ability of a drug to bind to receptor, shown by the Affinity is how well a drug and
proximity of the curve to the y axis (if the curves are parallel); the a receptor recognize each other.
nearer the y axis, the greater the affinity.
• Inversely related to Kd of the drug
• Selectivity: Relative affinity or activity of a drug between differ-
ent receptor types. Largely replaced the concept of specificity,
since it is improbable that any drug is specific for a particular
receptor.
• Efficacy: The ability of an agonist to elicit a response following Efficacy is the maximal effect an
binding. agonist can achieve at the highest
practical concentration.
• Potency: A measure of the concentration of a drug (agonist or
antagonist) at which it is effective. Potency is the quantity of drug
required to achieve a desired effect.
60
C
40
20
0
0.1 1.0 10.0
Drug concentration
Concentration-response curves for drugs A, B, and C are presented. Drugs A and B have equal effi
cacy, but drug A is more potent than drug B. Drug C is less effi cacious and less potent than either
drug A or drug B.
A B X
% Response 100 100
% Response
Y
50 50
Response
Ra + Dpa
Partial agonist
Ra + Ri
Ra + Dant + Ri + Dant
Constitutive Antagonist
activity Ri + Di
Inverse agonist
Log Dose
The hypothetical receptor is able to assume two conformations. In the Ri conformation, it is inactive and
produces no effect, even when combined with a drug molecule. In the Ra conformation, the receptor can activate
downstream mechanisms that produce a small observ-able effect, even in the absence of drug (constitutive
activity). In the absence of drugs, the two isoforms are in equilibrium, and the Ri form is favored. Conventional full
agonist drugs have a much higher affinity for the Ra conformation, and mass action thus favors the formation of
the Ra–D complex with a much larger observed effect. Partial agonists have an intermediate affinity for both Ri
and Ra forms. Conventional antagonists, according to this hypothesis, have equal affinity for both receptor forms
and maintain the same level of constitutive activity. Inverse agonists, on the other hand, have a much higher
affinity for the Ri form, reduce constitutive activity, and may produce a contrasting physiologic result.
In the figure below, drug B is a full agonist while drugs A and C are partial agonists.
B
100
% Response
A C
50
• Drug A is more potent than drug C, and drug B is more potent than
drug C.
• However, no general comparisons about potency can be made between
drugs A and B because the former is a partial agonist and the latter
is a full agonist.
• At low responses, A is more potent than B, but at high responses, the
reverse is true.
Duality of Partial Agonists
In the figure below, the lower curve represents effects of a partial agonist when
used alone; its ceiling effect is 50% of maximal in this example.
50
• The upper curve shows the effect of increasing doses of the partial
agonist on the maximal response (100%) achieved in the presence of
or by pretreatment with a full agonist.
• As the partial agonist displaces the full agonist from the receptor, the
response is reduced—the partial agonist is acting as an antagonist.
COMPETITIVE ANTAGONISM
In the presence of a competitive antagonist, the agonist
occupancy (i.e. proportion of receptors to which the agonist
is bound) at a given agonist concentration is reduced,
because the receptor can accommodate only one molecule
at a time. However, because the two are in competition,
raising the agonist concentration can restore the agonist
occupancy (and hence the tissue response). The antago-
nism is therefore said to be surmountable, in contrast to
other types of antagonism (see later) where increasing the
agonist concentration fails to overcome the blocking effect.
The salient features of competitive antagonism are:
Control Competitive
100
Potentiation Antagonism
% Response
Noncompetitive
Agonist +
A+C A alone
Response
–
A+B
B
A+D
Log Dose
Competitive
inhibitor
Allosteric
activator
Allosteric inhibitor
FIGURE 1–2 Drugs may interact with receptors in several ways. The effects resulting from these interactions are
diagrammed in the dose-response curves at the right. Drugs that alter the agonist (A) response may activate the
agonist binding site, compete with the agonist (competitive inhibitors, B), or act at separate (allosteric) sites, increasing
(C) or decreasing (D) the response to the agonist. Allosteric activators (C) may increase the efficacy of the agonist or its
binding affinity. The curve shown reflects an increase in efficacy; an increase in affinity would result in a leftward shift of
the curve.
FIGURE 2–2 Logarithmic transformation of the dose axis and
experimental demonstration of spare receptors, using different
concentrations of an irreversible antagonist. Curve A shows ago-
nist response in the absence of antagonist. After treatment with a
A B C
low concentration of antagonist (curve B), the curve is shifted to
the right. Maximal responsiveness is preserved, however, because
Agonist effect