Scribd
Upload
49 views3 pages

Bail Application for Pardeep Raghav

The document is an application for bail submitted by Pardeep Raghav, who is facing charges under FIR No. 73 of 2019 for offenses including IPC sections 406 and 420. The petitioner argues that he is a permanent resident with no risk of absconding, cites legal precedents emphasizing that bail is the norm, and requests release until the trial concludes. The application asserts that detaining him serves no purpose and that he is willing to provide necessary sureties.

Uploaded by

Shubham Rana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
49 views3 pages

Bail Application for Pardeep Raghav

The document is an application for bail submitted by Pardeep Raghav, who is facing charges under FIR No. 73 of 2019 for offenses including IPC sections 406 and 420. The petitioner argues that he is a permanent resident with no risk of absconding, cites legal precedents emphasizing that bail is the norm, and requests release until the trial concludes. The application asserts that detaining him serves no purpose and that he is willing to provide necessary sureties.

Uploaded by

Shubham Rana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

In the court OF Hon’ble Illaqa magistrate / Duty Megistrate

Sahabad

…………….

STATE OF HARYANA VERSUS Pardeep Raghav son of shri


Desh Raj resident of village

bhatta kaithal , haryana pin

code 136117

FIR NO 73 of 2019
U.S – 406 ,420IPC
P.S -Sahabad

Application to put up case file


with the permission to
surrender and grant bail in the
present matter .

Respectfully showeth -

1. That the petitioner hails from the reputed family


and is permanent resident of the above
mentioned address and there is no likely hood of
his being absconding or jumping over the bail.
2. That the accused applicant declared proclaimed
offender vide order dated 04.08.2023 .
3. That the accused / applicant
4. That the bail is rule of law and the custody of the -
applicant is an exception as in State of
Rajasthan v. Bal chand ,AIR 1977SC 2447:
(1977) 4 SCC 308 :(1978) 1 SCR 535, the
supreme court observed that “ the normal rule is
bail and not jail”. In Datta Ram Singh v. State
of U.P reported as 2018 (2)RCR (criminal),
page 131 hon’ble supreme court held that grant
of bail is general
5. rule and putting a person behind jail is an
exception . Also in Arnab M.Goswami V.State
of Maharastra &ors.2021 (2) SCC 427 it has
been held that “basic rule of our criminal justice
system is “bail not jail” all court must enforce this
principal.
6. That mere allegation does not amount the guilt of
any person, as the same requires evidence which
would be taken during the course of the trial. It is
also settled law that bail is a rule and jail is an
exception.
7. That the trial of the case will take a sufficient long
time and no purpose will be served by detaining
the petitioner in the judicial custody.
8. That the petitioner is ready to furnish the
surety/bail bonds as per the entire satisfaction of
this Hon’ble Court.
9. That it is a fit case for bail.
PRAYER
It is therefore prayed that the petitioner may
kindly be ordered to be release on the bail till
pending decision of the case, in the interest of
justice, law and equity.

Dated. – 18th may 2024


Place – Ambala
Petitioner
Pardeep Raghav Bhatta

Through Counsel :Shubham Rana @ Bhanu partap

You might also like