Disaster - CLUP
Ec system of registration n info
Ec in local dialect
50% with evac guide
Mobilization of persons
Resouces psyco social, security service,
ics
Plantilla position
Social protection vawc report
Philhealth accreditation (tigbinan facility was considered )
Business boss
Po lacap utilization rate, completion rate
Envi sanitary landfill alternative tech.
Box 7 a: Combined Generic Checklists for the Project Identification and Design Stages
Element and item/question Done Score for Gender issues
(col. 1) an item/ identified (col.
element* 4)
No Partly Yes (col. 3)
(2a) (2b) (2c)
1.0 Involvement of women and
men
(max score: 2; for each
item, 1)
1.1. Participation of women and
men in beneficiary groups in
problem identification (possible
score: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
1.2. Participation of women and
men in beneficiary groups in
project design(possible scores:
0, 0.5, 1.0)
2.0. Collection of sex-
disaggregated data and gender-
related information (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
3.0. Conduct of gender analysis
and identification of gender
issues (max score: 2; for each
item, 1)
3.1. Analysis of gender gaps and
inequalities related to gender
roles, perspectives and needs,
or access to and control of
resources (possible scores: 0,
0.5, 1.0)
3.2. Analysis of constraints and
opportunities related to women
and men’s participation in the
project
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
4.0 Gender equality goals,
outcomes and outputs
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project have clearly
stated gender equality goals,
objectives, outcomes or
outputs?
5.0. Matching of strategies
with gender issues
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Do the strategies and activities
match the gender issues and
gender quality goals identified?
6.0. Gender analysis of likely
impact of the project
(max score: 2; for each
item or question, 0.67)
6.1. Are women and girl
children among the direct or
indirect beneficiaries? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
6.2. Has the project considered
its long-term impact on
women’s socioeconomic status
and empowerment? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
6.3. Has the project included
strategies for avoiding or
minimizing negative impact on
women’s status and welfare?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
7.0 Monitoring targets and
indicators
(possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does the project include
gender equality targets and
indicators to measure gender
equality outputs and
outcomes?
8.0. Sex-disaggregated
database requirement
(possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does the project M&E system
require the collection of sex-
disaggregated data?
9.0. Resources (max score: 2;
for each question, 1.0)
9.1. Is the project’s budget
allotment sufficient for gender
equality promotion or
integration? OR, will the
project tap counterpart funds
from LGUs/partners for its GAD
efforts (possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0)
9.2. Does the project have the
expertise in promoting gender
equality and women’s
empowerment? OR, does the
project commit itself to
investing project staff time in
building capacities within the
project to integrate GAD or
promote gender equality?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
10.0 Relationship with the
agency’s GAD efforts
(maximum score: 2; for each
question or item, 0.67)
10.1 Will the project build on
or strengthen the
LGU’s commitment to the
empowerment of women?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
IF THE AGENCY HAD NO GAD
PLAN: Will the project help in
the formulation of the
implementing agency’s GAD
plan?
10.2. Will the project build on
the initiatives of actions of
other organizations in the area?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
10.3. Does the project have an
exit plan that will ensure the
sustainability of GAD efforts
and benefits? (possible scores:
0, 0.33, 0.67)
TOTAL GAD SCORE – PROJECT
DESIGN STAGE
