0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views5 pages

Research Methodology

This case study examines the impact of inadequate compensation on employee performance at XYZ Corp, highlighting issues such as employee dissatisfaction, lower performance metrics, and increased turnover rates. It employs a mixed-methods approach, including surveys and interviews, to gather quantitative and qualitative data on employee perceptions and experiences. The findings suggest that improving compensation practices could enhance employee satisfaction, performance, and retention.

Uploaded by

ecargkatiyar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views5 pages

Research Methodology

This case study examines the impact of inadequate compensation on employee performance at XYZ Corp, highlighting issues such as employee dissatisfaction, lower performance metrics, and increased turnover rates. It employs a mixed-methods approach, including surveys and interviews, to gather quantitative and qualitative data on employee perceptions and experiences. The findings suggest that improving compensation practices could enhance employee satisfaction, performance, and retention.

Uploaded by

ecargkatiyar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

INTRODUCTION

Compensation is a critical factor in employee satisfaction and


performance. This case study examines the impact of inadequate
compensation on employee performance in a mid-sized manufacturing
company, XYZ Corp. It also explores strategies to overcome the
challenges posed by poor compensation practices.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this case study on the impact of poor compensation on employee
performance at XYZ Corp are as follows:
1. Assess Employee Satisfaction:
To evaluate the level of employee satisfaction with current compensation packages
and identify specific areas of concern.
2. Analyze Performance Metrics:
To analyze the correlation between employee compensation levels and
performance metrics, including productivity, quality of work, and overall job
performance.
3. Identify Turnover Trends:
To investigate the relationship between compensation dissatisfaction and employee
turnover rates within the organization.
4. Gather Qualitative Insights:
To collect qualitative data through interviews and focus groups to understand
employee perceptions regarding compensation and its impact on motivation and
engagement.
5. Benchmark Against Industry Standards:
To compare XYZ Corp’s compensation practices with industry standards and best
practices to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement.
6. Develop Strategic Recommendations:
To formulate actionable strategies aimed at improving compensation practices,
enhancing employee satisfaction, and ultimately boosting performance and
retention.
7. Evaluate Non-Monetary Factors:
To explore the role of non-monetary benefits and their influence on overall
employee satisfaction and performance.
8. Establish a Framework for Ongoing Assessment:
To create a framework for regular assessment and review of compensation policies
to ensure alignment with employee expectations and market trends.
9. Promote Employee Engagement:
To identify ways to engage employees in discussions about compensation, fostering
a culture of transparency and inclusivity.
10. Measure Long-term Impact:
To set up mechanisms to measure the long-term effects of improved compensation
strategies on employee retention, performance, and organizational success.
METHODOLOGY

To analyze the impact of poor compensation on employee performance,


a mixed-methods approach was adopted:

1. Quantitative Analysis:
Surveys: A structured questionnaire was distributed to 200 employees to
assess their perceptions of compensation, job satisfaction, and
performance levels.
Performance Metrics: Employee performance data (KPIs) were collected
over a two-year period to identify trends related to compensation
changes.

2. Qualitative Analysis:
Interviews: In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 employees
across various departments to gather insights into their experiences and
perceptions regarding compensation.
Focus Groups: Two focus groups were held with HR personnel and
management to discuss compensation strategies and employee
feedback.
RESULTS

1. Quantitative Results:
Survey Results: 70% of employees reported dissatisfaction with their
compensation. Employees who felt under-compensated had
performance ratings that were 15% lower than those who felt fairly
compensated.
Performance Metrics: Analysis revealed that departments with higher
turnover rates also had lower productivity levels, directly correlating
with employee dissatisfaction regarding pay.

2. Qualitative Insights:
Employees expressed feelings of undervaluation and lack of motivation
due to inadequate pay.
Many employees indicated that they would be more engaged and
productive if they felt they were compensated fairly for their
contributions.
CONCLUSION

This case study highlights the significant impact of poor compensation


on employee performance at XYZ Corp. By implementing strategic
changes to their compensation practices, the company can improve
employee satisfaction, enhance performance, and reduce turnover rates.
It is essential for organizations to recognize the importance of fair
compensation as part of a broader strategy for talent management and
organizational success.

You might also like