Indian Legal System Overview
Indian Legal System Overview
MEANING OF LAW
imposed by
the
duties Government for securing
welfare and
SOURCES OF LAW
Precedents or
The Constitution
the Judicial
the statutes or
( basis and source Decisions of
of all laws )
laws made by
various Courts in some cases,
Parliament and
State Assemblies established
Customs
and Usages.
(i) Constitution of India foremost law that deals with the framework within which our
democratic system works
The people who wrote the Constitution decided to divide the law-
making power between the Central Government and the various
State Governments
Indian Constitution has three lists Viz., Central List, State List and
Joint List.
ICAI BOS 1
SARANSH INDIAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
When a law is
proposed in
parliament, it is After discussion and
called a Bill. debate, the law is
passed in Lok Sabha Thereafter, it has to be
passed in Rajya Sabha.
TYPES OF LAWS
Principles
Civil Law Common
Criminal Law of Natural
Law
Justice
Criminal law-
concerned with Code of Criminal
defines exhaustive
laws pertaining Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)
procedure for executing
to violations of
the punishments of the
the rule of law or
Criminal Offences- crimes.
public wrongs
Murder, rape, theft, fraud,
and punishment
cheating and assault,
of the same
etc
ICAI BOS 2
SARANSH INDIAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Code of
Matters of Civil
Law primarily
disputes Procedure, further classified
focuses on
between 1908 (CPC) into Law of
dispute
individuals or Contract, Family
resolution
organisations Law, Property
rather than
punishment Law, and Law of
Tort
A judgment
delivered by the
Supreme Court will
be binding upon the
courts within the doctrine of
A judicial territory of India Stare Decisis -
precedent or
“to stand by
a case law
that which is
decided.
reinforces the
obligation of courts to
follow the same
principle or judgement
established by previous
decisions while ruling a
case where the facts
are similar
ICAI BOS 3
SARANSH INDIAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Rules of
Natural Justice
Natural justice, often A judgement can
known as Jus Natural override or alter a
deals with certain common law, but it
fundamental principles cannot override or
of justice going beyond change the statute
written law.
A judgement can override or alter a common law but it cannot override or change the statute.
ENFORCING THE LAW
ICAI BOS 4
SARANSH INDIAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Department
of Economic
Affairs
Department
Department of
of Public
Expenditure
Enterprise
Department of
Investment and Department
Public Asset of Revenue
Management
Department
of Financial
Services
ICAI BOS 5
SARANSH INDIAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Central Translation
DEPARTMENT OF MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS Bureau
Central Hindi
Training Institution
Department Department
of Border Department of Official
Management of Home Language
Department
of Internal Department of
Security Jammu, Kashmir
Department
and Ladakh
of States
Affairs
ICAI BOS 6
SARANSH INDIAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
is India’s Central Bank and regulatory body responsible for regulation of the Indian
banking system.
It is under the ownership of Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
It is responsible for the control, issue and maintaining supply of the Indian rupee.
It also manages the country’s main payment systems and works to promote its
economic development.
Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (BRBNM) is a specialised division of RBI through
which it prints and mints Indian currency notes (INR) in two of its currency printing
presses located in Nashik (Western India) and Dewas (Central India).
RBI established the National Payments Corporation of India as one of its specialised
division to regulate the payment and settlement systems in India.
Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation was established by RBI as one of
its specialised division for the purpose of providing insurance of deposits and
guaranteeing of credit facilities to all Indian banks.
It attempts to
It handles the cases
simplify the
using two tribunals
process of
like NCLT (National
insolvency and
Company Law
bankruptcy
Tribunal) and Debt
proceedings.
Recovery Tribunal
ICAI BOS 7
SARANSH INDIAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
od of t e
es he
fa izen
d on f th
Pr
irn
cit
o
om am e la
,
t on
es of t
i
ot ong nd.
s
Ac rpr lat
an ati
s
C
ion
u
in eg
of he
R
FUNCTIONS OF
h
te
ts
t
JUDICIARY
SYSTEM OF
INDIA
HIERARCHY OF COURTS
Supreme
Court
Hig h C o urts
D istr
ict C o urts
Me
tro p o rts
lit a n C o u
1 2 3 4 5
Principal bench Presently, the An individual
Apex body of Chief Justice of of the Supreme number has can seek
the judiciary India is the Court consists of increased to 34
including the relief in the
highest 7 members Supreme
including the Chief Justice of
authority India due to the Court by
Chief Justice of rise in the
India filing a writ
number of cases
and workload petition
under Article 126 under Article 32
ICAI BOS 8
SARANSH INDIAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
has appellant,
There must be a High original jurisdiction,
Court in each state and Supervisory
jurisdiction
High Court
An individual
can seek remedies
Highest court of against violation of
appeal in each state fundamental rights in
and union territory High Court by filing a writ
Decision of High Court is Binding in the respective State and only persuasive in other states
(iii) DISTRICT COURT
ICAI BOS 9
www.tcaludhiana.com TOPPERS COMMERCE ACADEMY (tca) CA Foundation/CH- 2 Unit- 1
CHAPTER-2
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872
UNIT – 1:- NATURE OF CONTRACT
Meaning Every promise and every set of promises, Agreement enforceable by law.
Forming the consideration for each other. (Agreement + Legal enforceability)
(Offer + Acceptance)
Scope It’s a wider term including both legal and It is used in a narrow sense with the specification that
Social agreement. contract is only legally enforceable agreement.
Legal Obligation It may not create legal obligation. An Necessarily creates a legal obligation. A contract
agreement does not always grant rights always grants certain rights to every party.
to the parties
Nature All agreements are not contracts. All contracts are agreements.
As given by SECTION 10 of Indian Contract Act, Not given by Section 10 but are also considered
1872 essential
1 Agreement 1 Two Parties
2 Free Consent 2 Intention to Create Legal relationship
3 Competency of the Parties 3 Fulfilments of legal formalities
4 Lawful Consideration 4 Certainty of meaning
5 Legal Object 5 Possibility of performance
6 Not expressly declared to be void (as per Section
24 to 30 & 56)
I. Offer and Acceptance or an agreement: An agreement is the first essential element of a valid contract.
II. Free Consent: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.
This can also be understood as identity of minds in understanding the terms viz consensus ad idem.
Further such consent must be free. Consent would be considered as free consent if it is not caused by coercion, undue
influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake.
III. Capacity of the parties: Capacity to contract means the legal ability of a person to enter into a valid contract.
Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act specifies that every person is competent to contract who
V. Lawful Consideration and Object: The CONSIDERATION and OBJECT of the agreement must be LAWFUL.
VI. Not expressly declared to be void: The agreement entered into must not be which the law declares to be either
illegal or void. An illegal agreement is an agreement expressly or impliedly prohibited by law. A void agreement is
one without any legal effects.
2. Void
• ceases to be enforceable by law
Contract:
1. Express Contracts:
2. Implied Contracts:
3. Quasi-Contract:
4. E-Contracts:
• When a contract is entered into by two or more parties using electronics means,
• such as e-mails is known as e-commerce contracts.
• These are known as EDI CONTRACTS or CYBER CONTRACTS or MOUSE CLICK
CONTRACTS.
1.4 PROPOSAL / OFFER [SECTION 2(a) OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872]
Definition of Offer/Proposal:
“when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing
anything with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is
said to make a proposal”.
Classification of offer
3. It must be
1. It must be capable of 2. It must be certain,
communicated to the
creating legal relations: definite and not vague
offeree:
9. Offer is Different
7. The offer may be
8. The offer may be from a mere statement
either specific or
express or implied: of intention, an
general:
invitation to offer
1.5 ACCEPTANCE
Definition of Acceptance: In terms of Section 2(b) of the Act, the term ‘ACCEPTANCE’ is defined as follows:
“When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, proposal is said to be
accepted.
Relationship between offer and acceptance: According to Sir William Anson “Acceptance is to offer what a
lighted match is to a train of gun powder”.
(1) Acceptance can be given only by the person to whom offer is made:
•In case of a Specific Offer, it can be accepted only by the person to whom it is made
•In case of a General Offer, it can be accepted by Any Person who has the knowledge of the offer.
(5) Time:
•Acceptance must be given within the specified time limit, if any, and
•if no time is stipulated, within the reasonable time and before the offer lapses.
•The acceptance of an offer cannot be implied from the silence of the offeree or his failure to
answer,
•unless the offeree has in any previous conduct indicated that his silence is the evidence of
acceptance.
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 gives a lot of importance to “time” element in deciding when the offer and acceptance
is complete.
(iii) By non-
(vii) By
(i) By notice of fulfilment of (v) By counter
subsequent
revocation: condition offer
illegality.
precedent
Section Description
UNIT- 1
Consideration
Meaning & Definitions Legal Rules regarding Rule of *NO Consideration Doctrine of privity of
Valid Consideration no Contract* Contract with exception
Consideration is an essential element of a valid contract without which no single promise will be
enforceable. It is a term used in the sense of quid pro quo, i.e., ’SOMETHING IN RETURN’.
“When at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from
doing, or does or abstains from doing or promises to do or abstain from doing something, such an act or
abstinence or promise is called consideration for the promise”.
(1) Consideration is
an act- Doing
Something.
(2) Consideration
(5) Consideration
is abstinence-
may be past,
Abstain From
present or future.
Doing Something.
(i) Consideration
must move at the
• at the desire or request of the promisor
desire of the
promisor:
Though under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the consideration for an agreement may proceed from a third party, the third party
cannot sue on contract. Only a person who is party to a contract can sue on it.
The aforesaid rule, that stranger to a contract cannot sue is known as a “doctrine of Privity of contract”, is however,
subject to CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS.
(1) In the case of trust, a BENEFICIARY can enforce his right under the trust, though he was not a party
to the contract between the settler and the trustee.
(2) In the case of a family settlement, if the terms of the settlement are reduced into writing, the
members of family who originally had not been parties to the settlement may enforce the agreement.
(3) In the case of certain marriage contracts/arrangements, a provision may be made for the benefit of
a person, he may file the suit though he is not a party to the agreement.
(4) In the case of assignment of a contract, when the benefit under a contract has been assigned, the
assignee can enforce the contract but such assignment should not involve any personal skill.
(5) Acknowledgement or estoppel – where the promisor by his conduct acknowledges himself as an
agent of the third party, it would result into a binding obligation towards third party.
(6) In the case of covenant running with the land, the person who purchases land with notice that the
owner of land is bound by certain duties affecting land, the covenant affecting the land may be
enforced by the successor of the seller.
(7) Contracts entered into through an agent: The principal can enforce the contracts entered by his
agent where the agent has acted within the scope of his authority and in the name of the principal.
The general rule is that an agreement made without consideration is void (Section 25). In every valid contract,
consideration is very important. A contract may only be enforceable when consideration is there. However, the Indian Contract
Act contains CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS to this rule. In the following cases, the agreement though made without
consideration, will be valid and enforceable.
(i) It must be
(ii) Parties
made out of (iv) It must
must stand in
Natural Love (iii) It must be also be
Near
and affection in Writing. Registered
Relationship
between the under the law.
to each other.
parties.
2. Compensation for past voluntary services: A promise to compensate, wholly or in part, a person who has already
voluntarily done something for the promisor, is enforceable under Section 25(2). In order that a promise to pay for the past
voluntary services be binding, the following essential factors must exist:
(i) The services should have been rendered voluntarily.
(ii) The services must have been rendered for the promisor.
(iii) The promisor must be in existence at the time when services were rendered.
(iv) The promisor must have intended to compensate the promisee.
3. Promise to pay time barred debt: Where a promise in writing signed by the person making it or by his authorised agent, is
made to pay a debt barred by limitation it is valid without consideration [Section 25(3)].
4. Agency: According to Section 185 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, no consideration is necessary to create an agency.
5. Completed gift: In case of completed gifts, the rule “No Consideration, No Contract” does not apply. Thus, gifts do not
require any consideration.
6. Bailment: No consideration is required to affect the contract of bailment. Section 148 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines
bailment as the delivery of goods from one person to another for some purpose.
7. Charity: If a promisee undertakes the liability on the promise of the person to contribute to charity, there the contract shall be
valid. (Kadarnath v. Gorie Mohammad)
CHAPTER-2
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872
UNIT – 3:- OTHER ESSENTIAL
ELEMENTS OF A CONTRACT
Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides that an agreement in order to be a contract, must satisfy the
following conditions:
(C) is not
(A) has attained disqualified from
(B) is of sound
the age of contracting by
mind and
majority, any law to which
he is subject
(A) Age of Majority: In India, the age of majority is regulated by the Indian Majority Act, 1875. Every person
domiciled in India shall attain the age of majority on the completion of 18 Years of age and not before.
1. A contract made with or by a minor is void ab-initio: A minor is not competent to contract and any agreement
with or by a minor is void from the very beginning.
2. No ratification after attaining majority: A minor cannot ratify the agreement on attaining majority as the original
agreement is void ab initio and a void agreement can never be ratified.
3. Minor can be a beneficiary or can take benefit out of a contract: Though a minor is not competent to contract,
nothing in the Contract Act prevents the minor from making the other party bound to him.
4. A minor can always plead minority: Rule of estoppel cannot be applied against a minor. It means he can be
allowed to plea his minority in defence.
5. Liability for necessaries: A claim for necessaries supplied to a minor is enforceable by law. But a minor is not
liable for any price that he may promise and never for more than the value of the necessaries. There is no personal
liability of the minor, but only his property is liable.
Expenses on minor’s Education, On Funeral Ceremonies come within the scope of the word
‘necessaries’.
6. Contract by guardian - how far enforceable: Though a minor’s agreement is void, his guardian can, under certain
circumstances enter into a valid contract on minor’s behalf.
there will be
valid contract
which is for the which the
benefit of the minor can
which is within minor, enforce.
his competence
Where the and
guardian makes
a contract for
the minor,
7. No specific performance: A minor’s agreement being absolutely void, there can be no question of the specific
performance of such an agreement.
9. Partnership: A minor being incompetent to contract cannot be a partner in a partnership firm, but under Section
30 of the Indian Partnership Act, he can be admitted to the benefits of partnership.
10. Minor can be an agent: A minor can act as an agent. But he will not be liable to his principal for his acts.
11. Minor cannot bind parent or guardian: In the absence of authority, express or implied, an infant is not capable
of binding his parent or guardian, even for necessaries. The parents will be held liable only when the child is acting
as an agent for parents.
12. Joint contract by minor and adult: In such a case, the adult will be liable on the contract and not the minor.
13. Surety for a minor: In a contract of guarantee when an adult stands surety for a minor then he (adult) is liable to
third party as there is direct contract between the surety and the third party.
14. Minor as Shareholder: A minor, being incompetent to contract cannot be a shareholder of the company. But, a
minor may, acting though his lawful guardian become a shareholder by transfer or transmission of fully paid shares
to him.
15. Liability for torts: A tort is a civil wrong. A minor is liable in tort unless the tort in reality is a breach of contract.
3. Minor can be a
1. A contract made 2. No ratification 4. A minor can
beneficiary or can
with or by a minor is after attaining always plead
take benefit out of a
void ab-initio majority minority
contract
6. Contract by
5. Liability for 7. No specific
guardian - how far 8. No insolvency
necessaries performance
enforceable
(B) Person of sound mind: According to Section 12 of Indian Contract Act, “a person is said to be of Sound Mind for
the purposes of making a contract if, at the time when he makes it is capable of understanding it and of forming a
rational judgement as to its effect upon his interests.”
Example: A patient in a lunatic asylum, who is at intervals, of sound mind, may contract during those intervals.
Position of
unsound mind
person making a
contract:
A contract by a
person who is
not of sound
mind is VOID.
(C) Contract by disqualified persons: Besides minors and persons of unsound mind, there are also other persons who
are disqualified from contracting, partially or wholly, so that the contracts by such person are VOID. Incompetency to
contract may arise from political status, corporate status, legal status, etc. The following persons fall in this category:
Foreign
Sovereigns
Alien enemy, Corporations, Convicts, Insolvent etc.
and
Ambassadors,
“Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon
“Coercion’ is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code or the unlawful
detaining, or threatening to detain any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of
causing any person to enter into an agreement.”
(ii) As to the consequences of the rescission of voidable contract, the party rescinding a void contract
should, if he has received any benefit, thereunder from the other party to the contract, RESTORE such
benefit so far as may be applicable, to the person from whom it was received.
(iii) A person to whom money has been paid or anything delivered under coercion must Repay or Return it.
(Section 72)
(i) When consent to an agreement is caused by undue influence, the agreement is a contract VOIDABLE at the option
of the party whose consent was so caused.
(ii) Any such contract may be set aside either absolutely or, if the party who was entitled to avoid it, has received
any benefit thereunder, upon such terms and conditions as to the Court may seem just.
‘Fraud’ means and includes any of the Following Acts committed by a party to a contract,
or with his connivance, or by his agent, with an intent to deceive another party thereto or
his agent, or to induce him to enter into the contract:
1. the suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true;
2. the Active Concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact;
3. a promise made without any intention of performing it;
4. any other act fitted to deceive;
5. any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent.
There Must Be A Representation or assertion and it must be false. However, silence may amount to fraud
or an active concealment may amount to fraud.
The representation should be made before the conclusion of the contract with the intention to
induce the other party to act upon it.
The representation or statement should be made with knowledge of its falsity or without belief
in its truth or recklessly not caring whether it is true or false.
The other party must have been induced to act upon the representation or assertion.
The other party must have relied upon the representation and must have been deceived.
The other party acting on the representation must have consequently Suffered A Loss.
Effect of Fraud upon validity of a contract: When the consent to an agreement in caused by the fraud, the contract is VOIDABLE
at option of the party defrauded and he has the following remedies:
(1) statement of FACT, which of false, would constitute misrepresentation if the maker believes it to be true but
which is not justified by the information he possesses;
(2) When there is a breach of duty by a person without any intention to deceive which brings an advantage to
him;
(3) When a party causes, even though done innocently, the other party to the agreement to make a mistake as to the
subject matter.
Mistake: Mistake may be defined as innocent or erroneous belief which leads the party to misunderstand the
others. Mistake may be either mistake of law or mistake of fact.
Mistake of Law: Mistake of law is further classified as mistake of Indian law or mistake of foreign law.
(i) Mistake of Indian Law: A person cannot be allowed to get any relief on the ground that it had done a
particular act in ignorance of law.
(ii) Mistake of foreign law: Such a mistake is treated as mistake of fact and the agreement in such a case is
void.
(1) Agreement in restraint of marriage (Section 26): Every agreement in restraint of marriage of any person other than a
minor is void.
(2) Agreement in restraint of trade (Section 27): An agreement by which any person is restrained from exercising a lawful
profession, trade or business of any kind, is to that extent void.
But this rule is subject to the following exceptions, namely, where a person sells the goodwill of a business and agrees
with the buyer to refrain from carrying on a similar business, within specified local limits, such an agreement is valid.
(3) Agreement in restraint of legal proceedings (Section 28): An agreement in restraint of legal proceeding is the one by
which any party thereto is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights under a contract through a Court or which abridges the
usual period for starting legal proceedings. A contract of this nature is void.
(4) Agreement - the meaning of which is uncertain (Section 29): An agreement, the meaning of which is not certain, is void,
but where the meaning thereof is capable of being made certain, the agreement is valid.
(5) Wagering agreement (Section 30): An agreement by way of a wager is void. It is an agreement involving payment of a
sum of money upon the determination of an uncertain event.
Essentials of a Wager
There must be
There must be a common
There must be
promise to pay intention to bet
uncertainty of
money or at the timing of
event.
money’s worth. making such
agreement.
(i) Lottery transactions: A lottery is a game of chance and not of skill or knowledge. Where the prime motive of participant is
gambling, the transaction amounts to a wager. Even if the lottery is sanctioned by the Government of India it is a
wagering transaction.
(ii) Crossword Puzzles and Competitions: Crossword puzzles in which prizes depend upon the correspondence of the
competitor’s solution with a previously prepared solution kept with the editor of a newspaper is a lottery and therefore, a
wagering transaction. wagers provided the prize money does not exceed Rs 1,000.
(iii) Speculative transactions: an agreement or a share market transaction where the parties intend to settle the difference
between the contract price and the market price of certain goods or shares on a specified day, is a gambling and hence void.
(iv) Horse Race Transactions: A horse race competition where prize payable to the bet winner is less than Rs 500, is a wager.
(i) Chit fund: Chit fund does not come within the scope of wager (Section 30). In case of a chit fund, a certain number of
persons decide to contribute a fixed sum for a specified period and at the end of a month, the amount so contributed is paid
to the lucky winner of the lucky draw.
(ii) Commercial transactions or share market transactions: In these transactions in which delivery of goods or shares is
intended to be given or taken, do not amount to wagers.
(iii) Games of skill and Athletic Competition: Crossword puzzles, picture competitions and athletic competitions where
prizes are awarded on the basis of skill and intelligence are the games of skill and hence such competition are valid.
According to the Prize Competition Act, 1955 prize competition in games of skill are not wagers provided the prize
money does not exceed Rs 1,000.
(iv) A contract of insurance: A contract of insurance is a type of contingent contract and is valid under law and these
contracts are different from wagering agreements.
UNIT- 3
CHAPTER-2
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872
UNIT – 4: PERFORMANCE OF A CONTRACT
Types: On the basis of Section 37, “Performance of Contract” may be actual or attempted.
(a) Actual Performance: Where a party to a contract has done what he had undertaken to do or either of the
parties has fulfilled their obligations under the contract within the time and in the manner prescribed.
Example 1: X borrows Rs 5,00,000 from Y with a promise to be paid after 1 month. X repays the amount on the
due date. This is actual performance.
(b) Offer to perform or attempted performance or tender of performance: It may happen sometimes, when the
performance becomes due, the promisor offers to perform his obligation but the promisee refuses to accept the
performance.
Example 2: A promises to deliver certain goods to B. A takes the goods to the appointed place during business
hours but B refuses to take the delivery of goods. This is an attempted performance as A the promisor has done
what he was required to do under the contract.
It must be unconditional
1. Promisor himself:
If there is something in the contract to show that it was the intention of the parties, such promise must be
performed by the promisor.
This means contracts which involve the exercise of personal skill or diligence, or which are founded on personal
confidence between the parties must be performed by the promisor himself.
2. Agent: Where personal consideration is not the foundation of a contract, the promisor or his representative
may employ a competent person to perform it.
3. Legal Representatives: A contract which involves the use of personal skill or is founded on personal
consideration comes to an end on the death of the promisor.
4. Third persons: Effect of accepting performance from third person- Section 41: When a promisee accepts
performance of the promise from a third person, he cannot afterwards enforce it against the promisor. That is,
performance by a stranger, if accepted by the promisee, this results in discharging the promisor, although the
latter has neither authorised not ratified the act of the third party.
In the matter of assignment, however the benefit of a contract can only be assigned but not the liabilities
thereunder.
When two or more persons make a joint promise, the promisee may, in the absence of express agreement to the
contrary, compel any one or more of such joint promisors to perform the whole of the promise.
Each promisor may compel contribution – If one of the joint promisors is made to perform the whole contract, he
can call for a contribution from others.
Sharing of loss by default in contribution – If any one of two or more joint promisors makes default in such
contribution, the remaining joint promisors must bear the loss arising from such default in equal shares.
The effect of release of one of the joint promisors is dealt with in Section 44 which is stated below:
Where two or more persons have made a joint promise, a release of one of such joint promisors by the promisee
does not discharge the other joint promisor or joint promisors, neither does it free the joint promisors so
released from responsibility to the other joint promisor or promisors.
(i) Promisor not bound to perform, unless reciprocal promise ready and willing to perform- Section 51
When a contract consists of reciprocal promises to be simultaneously performed, no promisor needs to perform
his promise unless the promisee is ready and willing to perform his reciprocal promise.
(ii) Order of performance of reciprocal promises- Section 52 When the order of performance of the reciprocal
promises is expressly fixed by the contract, they shall be performed in that order; and where the order is not
expressly fixed by the contract, they shall be performed in that order which the nature of the transaction
requires.
(iii) Liability of party preventing event on which the contract is to take effect – Section 53
When a contract contains reciprocal promises, and one party to the contract prevents the other from performing
his promise, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the party so prevented
(iv) Effect of default as to that promise which should be first performed, in contract consisting of reciprocal
promises (Section 54)
When a contract consists of reciprocal promises, such that one of them cannot be performed, or that its
performance cannot be claimed till the other has been performed.
(v) Effects of Failure to Perform at a Time Fixed in a Contract in which Time is Essential (Section 55)
“When a party to a contract promises to do certain thing at or before the specified time, and fails to do any
such thing at or before the specified time, the contract, or so much of it as has not been performed, becomes
voidable at the option of the promisee,
The impossibility of performance may be of the two types, namely (a) initial impossibility, and (b) subsequent
impossibility.
(1) Initial Impossibility (Impossibility existing at the time of contract): When the parties agree upon doing of
something which is obviously impossible in itself the agreement would be VOID. Impossible in itself means
impossible in the nature of things. The fact of impossibility may be and may not be known to the parties.
(i) If known to the parties: It would be observed that an agreement constituted, quite known to the parties,
may be impossible of being performed and hence VOID.
(ii) If unknown to the parties: Where both the promisor and the promisee are ignorant of the impossibility of
performance, the contract is VOID.
(iii) If known to the promisor only: Where at the time of entering into a contract, the promisor alone knows
about the impossibility of performance, or even if he does not know though he should have known it with
reasonable diligence, the promisee is entitled to claim compensation for any loss.
(2) Subsequent or Supervening impossibility (Becomes impossible after entering into contract): When
performance of promise become impossible or illegal by occurrence of an unexpected event or a change of
circumstances beyond the contemplation of parties, the contract becomes VOID e.g. change in law etc.
(vii) Reciprocal promise to do certain things that are LEGAL, and also some other things that are ILLEGAL-
Section 57-
Where persons reciprocally promise, first to do certain things which are legal and secondly, under specified
circumstances, to do certain other things which are illegal, the first set of promises is a valid contract, but the
second is a void agreement.
The law on this point is contained in Section 58 which says that “In the case of the alternative promise, one
branch of which is legal and the other illegal, the legal branch alone can be enforced”.
(i) Application of payment where debt to be discharged is indicated (Section 59): Where a debtor, owing
several distinct debts to one person, makes a payment to him either with express intimation or under
circumstances implying that the payment is to be applied to the discharge of some particular debt, the
payment, if accepted, must be applied accordingly.
(ii) Application of payment where debt to be discharged is not indicated (Section 60): Where the debtor has
omitted to intimate and there are no other circumstances indicating to which debt the payment is to be applied
the creditor may apply it at his discretion to any lawful debt actually due. However he cannot apply the
payment to the disputed debt.
(iii) Application of payment where neither party appropriates (Section 61): Where neither party makes any
appropriation, the payment shall be applied in discharge of the debts in order of time, whether they are or are
not barred by the law in force for the time being as to the limitation of suits. If the debts are of equal standing,
the payments shall be applied in discharge of each proportionately.
“If the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or alter it, the original
contract need not be performed”
Analysis of Section 62
In the case of rescission, only the old contract is cancelled and no new contract comes to exist in its
place.
Both in novation and in rescission, the contract is discharged by Mutual Agreement.
where the parties to a contract agree to alter it, the original contract is rescinded,
“Every promisee may dispense with or remit, wholly or in part, the performance of the promise made to him,. In
other words, a contract may be discharged by remission.
The party rescinding avoidable contract shall, if he has received any benefit thereunder from another party to
such contract, RESTORE such benefit, so far as may be, to the person from whom it was received”.
(iv) Obligations of Person who has Received Advantage under Void Agreement or contract that becomes void
(Section 65)
“When an agreement is discovered to be void or when a contract becomes void, any person who has received any
advantage under such agreement or contract is bound to RESTORE it, or to make compensation for it to the
person from whom he received it.”
The Act requires that a party must give back whatever he has received under the contract. The benefit to be
restored under this section must be benefit received under the contract (and not any other amount).
rescission must be communicated to the other party in the Same Manner as a proposal is communicated under
Section 4 of the Contract Act.
(vi) Effects of neglect of promisee to afford promisor reasonable facilities for performance (Section 67): If any
promisee neglects or refuses to afford the promisor reasonable facilities for the performance of his promise, the
promisor is excused by such neglect or refusal as to any non-performance caused thereby.
DISCHARGE OF A CONTRACT
(viii) Effects of
(ii) Discharge by (v) Discharge by neglect of promisee
mutual agreement operation of law to afford promisor
reasonable facilities
for performance
UNIT- 4
CHAPTER-2
Breach means failure of a party to perform his or her obligation under a contract. Breach of contract
may arise in two ways:
Anticipatory breach of a contract may take either of the following two ways:
Effect of Anticipatory Breach: The promisee is excused from performance or from further performance.
Further he gets an option:
(1) To either treat the contract as “rescinded and sue the other party for damages from breach of
contract immediately without waiting until the due date of performance; or
(2) He may elect not to rescind but to treat the contract as still operative, and wait for the time of
performance and then hold the other party responsible for the consequences of non-performance.
But in this case, he will keep the contract alive,
and the Guilty Party, if he (Guilty Party) so decides on re-consideration, may still perform his part
of the contract.
(b) During the performance of the contract: Actual breach of contract also occurs when during the
performance of the contract, one party fails or refuses to perform his obligation under it by express
or implied act.
Compensation can be claimed for any loss or damage which naturally arises
in the usual course of events.
A compensation can also be claimed for any loss or damage which the party
knew when they entered into the contract, as likely to result from the breach.
But the party suffering from the breach is bound to take reasonable steps to
minimise the loss.
1. If the sum payable is so large as to be far in excess of the probable damage on breach, it is
certainly a Penalty.
2. Where a sum is expressed to be payable on a certain date and a further sum in the event of
default being made, the latter sum is a penalty because mere delay in payment is unlikely
to cause damage.
4. English law makes a distinction between liquidated damages and penalty, but no such
distinction is followed in India. The courts in India must ascertain the actual loss and award
the same which amount must not, however exceed the sum so fixed in the contract. The
courts have not to bother about the distinction but to award reasonable compensation not
exceeding the sum so fixed.
Besides claiming damages as a remedy for the breach of contract, the following remedies are also
available:
(i) Rescission of (ii) Quantum (iii) Suit for (iv) Suit for
contract: Meruit: specific injunction:
performance:
• When a • i.e. as much as • Where damages • Where a party
contract is the party doing are not an to a contract is
broken by one the service has adequate negating the
party, deserved. remedy terms of a
• the other party • the court may contract,
may treat the direct party in • the court may,
contract as breach, restrain him
rescinded. • to carry out his from doing
promise what he
according to the promised not to
terms of the do.
contract.
UNIT- 5
CHAPTER-2
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872
Unit – 6:- CONTINGENT & QUASI
CONTRACTS
Meaning of collateral Event: Pollock and Mulla defined collateral event as “an event which is neither a
PERFORMANCE directly promised as part of the contract, nor the whole of the CONSIDERATION for a
promise”.
(c) A contract would cease to be enforceable if it is contingent upon the conduct of a living person when
that living person does something to make the ‘event’ or ‘conduct’ as impossible of happening.
if a specified uncertain event happens within a fixed time, becomes void if, at the expiration of time
fixed, such event has not happened, or if, before the time fixed, such event becomes impossible.
“Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything, if a specified uncertain event does not happen within
a fixed time, may be enforced by law when the time fixed has expired, and such event has not happened
or before the time fixed has expired, if it becomes certain that such event will not happen”.
Example 13: A promises to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship does not return within a year. The
contract may be enforced if the ship does not return within the year, or is burnt within the year.
(f) Contingent on an impossible event (Section 36): Contingent agreements to do or not to do anything,
if an impossible event happens are VOID, whether the impossibility of the event is known or not to the
parties to the agreement at the time when it is made.
Such cases are not contract in the strict sense, but the Court recognises them as relations
resembling those of contracts and enforces them as if they were contracts.
A quasi or constructive contract rest upon the maxims, “No man must grow rich out of another
person’s loss”.
Under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, the relationship of quasi contract is DEEMED TO have
come to exist in 5 different circumstances.
(a) Claim for • To establish his claim, the supplier must prove not
necessaries only that
supplied to • the goods were supplied to the person who was
persons minor or a lunatic but
incapable of
contracting • also that they were suitable to his actual
(Section 68): requirements at the time of the sale and delivery.
It is “a contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to
him by the conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person.”
Parties:
(a) The party who promises to indemnify/ save the other party from loss- “INDEMNIFIER”,
(b) The party who is saved against the loss- “INDEMNIFIED” or “Indemnity Holder”.
However, the above definition of indemnity restricts the scope of contracts of indemnity in as much as it
covers only the loss caused by:
Thus, loss occasioned by an accident not caused by any person, or an act of God/ natural event, is not
covered.
Mode of contract of indemnity: A contract of indemnity like any other contract may be express or
implied.
A contract of indemnity is like any other contract and must fulfil all the essentials of a valid
contract.
Contract of guarantee: A contract of guarantee is a contract to perform the promise made or discharge
the liability, of a third person in case of his default.
A contract of guarantee is a TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT between principal debtor, creditor and surety. There
are, in effect three contracts
An Implied Contract between the surety and the principal debtor whereby
principal debtor is under an obligation to indemnify the surety; if the surety
is made to pay or perform.
The right of surety is not affected by the fact that the creditor has refused to sue the principal debtor or
that he has not demanded the sum due from him.
Where a person
gives a guarantee
misrepresentation upon a contract
If there is no consideration The liability made by the that the creditor
principal received by must be creditor, or without shall not act upon
debt, there the principal legally his knowledge and may be either it until another
can be no debtor is enforceable assent, concerning oral or written person has joined
valid sufficient and not time a material part of in it as co-surety,
guarantee consideration barred. the transaction, is the guarantee is
invalid not valid if that
other person does
not join
A. Specific Guarantee- A guarantee which extends to a single debt/ specific transaction is called a
specific guarantee. The surety’s liability comes to an end when the guaranteed debt is duly discharged or
the promise is duly performed.
B. Continuing Guarantee [Section 129] - A guarantee which extends to a series of transaction is called a
continuing guarantee. A surety’s liability continues until the revocation of the guarantee.
The essence of continuing guarantee is that it applies not to a specific number of transactions but to any
number of transactions and makes the surety liable for the unpaid balance at the end of the guarantee.
(b) Revocation of
continuing • the death of surety operates as a revocation of a
guarantee by continuing guarantee as to the future transactions
surety’s death
(Section 131):
(a) Guarantee obtained by misrepresentation [Section 142]: Any guarantee which has been obtained by
means of misrepresentation made by the creditor, or with his knowledge and assent, concerning a
material part of the transaction, is invalid.
(b) Guarantee obtained by concealment [Section 143]: Any guarantee which the creditor has obtained by
means of keeping silence as to material circumstances is invalid.
(c) Guarantee on contract that creditor shall not act on it until co-surety joins (Section 144): Where a
person gives a guarantee upon a contract that the creditor shall not act upon it until another person has
joined in it as co-surety, the guarantee is not valid if that other person does not join.
Rights
against co-
Rights sureties.
against the
Rights principal
against the debtor,
creditor,
“Co-sureties (meaning)- When the same debt or duty is guaranteed by two or more
persons, such persons are called co-sureties”
(a) Co-sureties liable to contribute equally (Section 146): Unless otherwise agreed, each surety is
liable to contribute equally for discharge of whole debt or part of the debt remains unpaid by debtor.
(b) Liability of co-sureties bound in different sums (Section 147): The principal of equal contribution
is, however, subject to the maximum limit fixed by a surety to his liability. Co-sureties who are bound
in different sums are liable to pay equally as far as the limits of their respective obligations permit.
CHAPTER-2
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872
UNIT – 8:- BAILMENT AND
PLEDGE
Parties to bailment:
Example 1: Where ‘X’ delivers his car for repair to ‘Y’, ‘X’ is the bailor and ‘Y’ is the
bailee.
Example 3: Goods given to a friend for his own use, without any charge.
Essential Elements:
(a) Contract: Bailment is based upon a contract. The contract may be express or implied.
No consideration is necessary to create a valid contract of bailment.
(b) Delivery of goods: It involves the delivery of goods from one person to another for some
purposes. Bailment is only for moveable goods and never for immovable goods or money.
The delivery of the possession of goods is of the following kinds:
(c) Purpose: The goods are delivered For Some Purpose. The purpose may be express or
implied.
(e) Return of goods: Bailee is obliged to return the goods physically to the bailor. It should
be noted that exchange of goods should not be allowed.
Types of bailment
a. Gratuitous Bailment: The word gratuitous means free of charge. So, a gratuitous
bailment is one when the provider of service does it gratuitously i.e. free of charge.
Such bailment would be either for the exclusive benefits of bailor or bailee.
b. Non-Gratuitous Bailment: Non gratuitous bailment means where both the parties
get some benefit i.e. bailment for the benefit of both bailor & bailee.
a. In case of Gratuitous Bailment: The bailor is bound to disclose to the bailee faults in the
goods bailed, of which the bailor is aware, he is responsible for damage arising to the
bailee directly from such faults.
b. In case of Non- Gratuitous Bailment: If the goods are bailed for hire, the bailor is
responsible for such damage, whether he was or was not aware of the existence of such
faults in the goods bailed.
a. In case of Gratuitous bailment: Where, by the conditions of the bailment, the goods are
to be kept or to be carried, or to have work done upon them by the bailee for the bailor,
and the bailee is to receive no remuneration (gratuitous bailment), the bailor shall repay
to the bailee the necessary expenses incurred by him and any extraordinary expenses
incurred by him for the purpose of the bailment.
b. In case of non-gratuitous bailment the bailor is liable to pay the extraordinary expenses
incurred by the bailee.
(iii) Duty to indemnify the Bailee for premature termination [Section 159]
The bailor must compensate the bailee for the loss or damage suffered by the bailee that
is in excess of the benefit received, where he had lent the goods gratuitously and decides
to terminate the bailment before the expiry of the period of bailment.
a. Indemnify for any loss which the bailee may sustain by reason that the bailor was not
entitled to make the bailment, or to receive back the goods or to give directions, respecting
them (defective title in goods).
b. It is the duty of the bailor to receive back the goods when the bailee returns them after
the time of bailment has expired.
Not to Set
Up Adverse
Title
1. Right to Deliver the Goods to any one of the joint bailors [Section 165]
5. Right to Apply to Court to Decide the Title to the Goods [Section 167]
3. By Notice:
• (a) Where the bailee acts in a manner which is inconsistent with the
terms of the bailment, the bailor can always terminate the contract of
bailment.
• (b) A gratuitous bailment can be terminated by the bailor at any time
by giving a notice to the bailee.
4. By death:
• A gratuitous bailment terminates upon the death of either the bailor or
the bailee.
It is the duty of the finder of goods to find the true owner and surrender the goods
to him.
However, the finder of goods has no right to sue the owner for compensation for
trouble and expense voluntarily incurred by him in finding the owner and preserving
the goods found.
But he has a right to retain the goods against the owner until he receives such
compensation; and,
where the owner has offered a specific reward on the lost goods, the finder may sue
the owner for such reward, and may retain the goods until then.
(1) when the thing is in danger of Perishing or of losing the greater part of its value, or
(2) when the lawful charges of the finder in respect of the thing found amount to
two/thirds (2/3rd) of its value.
RIGHT OF LIEN
a. Particular b. General
Lien Lien
Particular Lien: It is a right to retain only the particular goods in respect of which the
claim is due. ( remuneration for services rendered on goods, until paid for )
General Lien: It is a right to retain the goods not only for demands arising out of the goods
retained but for a general balance of account in favour of certain persons (in the absence
of a contract to the contrary).
Section 171 provides this right is available to Bankers, factors, wharfingers, policy brokers
and attorneys of law.
8.10 PLEDGE
“Pledge”, “pawnor” and “pawnee” defined [Section 172]: The bailment of goods as
security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise is called “pledge”. The bailor
is in this case called the “pawnor”. The bailee is called the “pawnee”.
CHAPTER-2
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872
UNIT – 9: AGENCY
The principal means a person for whom such act is done or who is so represented.
If the answer to these questions is in affirmative (Yes), then there is a relationship of agency.
According to Section 184 of the Act any person may become an agent i.e. even a minor or a person of
unsound mind may become an agent and the principal shall be bound by his acts.
1. Express Authority: An authority is said to be express when it is given by words, spoken or written.
2. Implied Authority: An authority is said to be implied when it is to be inferred from the circumstances
of the case, conduct of the parties.
a. Agency by Estoppel [Section 237]: Where the principal by his conduct or statement wilfully induces
another person to believe that a certain person is his agent, he is subsequently prevented or estopped
from denying the fact of agency.
3. Agency by Operation of Law: When law treats one person as an agent of other. For example, a partner
is the agent of the firm for the purposes of the business of the firm.
4. Rights of person as to acts done for him without his authority, Effect of ratification [Section 196]: If
he ratifies them, the same effects will follow as if they had been performed by his authority.
a. Ratification may be expressed or Implied [Section 197]: Ratification may be expressed or may be
implied in the conduct of the person on whose behalf the acts are done.
b. Knowledge requisite for valid ratification [Section 198]: No valid ratification can be made by a person
whose knowledge of the facts of the case is materially defective.
c. The whole transaction must be ratified [Section 199]: There can be ratification of an act in Entirely or
its rejection in entirely. The principal cannot ratify a part of the transaction which is beneficial to him.
d. Ratification cannot injure third person [Section 200]: When the interest of third parties is affected, the
principle of ratification does not apply.
e. Ratification within reasonable time: Ratification must be made within a reasonable period of time.
g. Act to be ratified must be valid: Act to be ratified should not be void or illegal, for e.g. payment of
dividend out of capital, forgery of signatures, any other criminal offence.
(b) in emergency.
(a) Agent’s authority in normal circumstances [Section 188]: An agent having an authority to do an act
has authority to do every lawful thing which is necessary in order to do such act.
(b) Agent’s authority in an emergency [Section 189]: An agent has authority, in an emergency, to do all
such acts for the purpose of protecting his principal from loss as would be done by a person of ordinary
prudence, in his own case, under similar circumstances.
(i) Agent should not be a in a position or have any opportunity to communicate with his principal.
(ii) There should have been actual and definite commercial necessity for the agent to act promptly.
(iii) the agent should have acted bonafide and for the benefit of the principal.
(iv) the agent should have adopted the most reasonable and practicable course under the circumstances,
(v) the agent must have been in possession of the goods belonging to his principal and which are the
subject of contract.
9.5 SUB-AGENTS
When agent cannot delegate [Section 190]: An agent cannot lawfully employ another to perform acts
which he has expressly or impliedly undertaken to perform personally, unless by the ordinary custom of
trade a sub-agent may, or from the nature of the agency, a sub-agent must, be employed.
A contract of agency is of a Fiduciary Character. It is based on the confidence reposed by the principal in
the agent and that is why a DELEGATEE cannot further delegate.
(1) The appointment of a sub agent would be valid if the terms of appointment
originally contemplated it.
(2) Sometimes customs of the trade may provide for appointment of sub
agents. In both these cases the sub agent would be treated as the agent of
the principal.
Representation of principal by sub-agent Properly Appointed [Section 192]: Where a sub-agent is properly
appointed,
Agent’s responsibility for sub-agent Appointed without Authority [Section 193]: Where an agent, without
having authority to do so, has appointed a person to act as a sub-agent, agent will be responsible to
principal & third parties.
Substituted Agent is a person appointed by the agent to act for the principal, in the business of agency,
with the knowledge and consent of the principal. Substituted agents are not sub agents. They are agents
of the principal.
Agent’s duty in naming such person [Section 195]: In selecting such agent for his principal, an agent is
bound to exercise the same amount of discretion as a man of ordinary prudence would exercise in his own
case; and, if he does this, he is not responsible to the principal for the acts or negligence of the agent so
selected.
2. The agent delegates to him a part of his own The agent does not delegate any part of
alone. principal.
5. The agent is responsible to the principal for The agent is not responsible to the
6. The sub-agent has no right of action against The substituted agent can sue the
the principal for remuneration due to him. principal for remuneration due to him.
improperly appointed.
(i) Duty to follow • When the agent acts otherwise and any loss is sustained by the Principal,
instructions or • he must indemnify him, and, if any profit accrues, he must account for it.
customs:
• The agent is always bound to act with such skill as he possesses; and
(ii) Duty of • to make compensation to his principal in respect of the direct consequences of
reasonable care and his own neglect,
skill: • but not in respect of loss of damage which are indirectly or remotely caused by
such neglect,.
(iii) Duty to render • An agent is bound to render proper accounts to his principal on demand.
proper accounts • Rendering accounts does not mean showing the accounts but the accounts
[Section 213]: supported by vouchers.
• Agent should not deal on his own account without first obtaining the consent of
(v) Duty not to the principal,
• otherwise the principal may—
deal on his own • (a) repudiate the transaction, (Section 215)
account: • (b) claim from the agent any benefit which may have resulted to him from the
transaction. (S. 216)
(vii) Duty not to • an agent cannot lawfully employ to perform acts which he has undertaken to
perform personally,
delegate: • unless by the ordinary custom of trade a sub-agent may be employed.
(i) Right of retain out of sums received on principal’s account [Section 217]: This section empowers the
agent to retain, out of any sums received on account of the principal in the business of the agency for the
following payments:
(c) such remuneration as may be payable to him for acting as agent. The right can be exercised on
any sums received on account of the principal in the business of agency.
(ii) Right to remuneration [Section 219]: The agent in the normal course is entitled for remuneration as
per the contract.
(iii) Agent’s lien on principal’s property [Section 221]: In the absence of any contract to the contrary, an
agent is entitled to retain the goods, papers and other property, whether movable or immovable,
a. Right of indemnification for lawful acts [Section 222]: The principal is bound to indemnify the agent
against all consequences of lawful acts done in exercise of his authority.
b. Right of indemnification against acts done in good faith [Section 223]: Where the agent acts in good
faith on the instruction of principal, agent is entitled for indemnification of any loss or damage from the
principal.
c. Non-liability of employer of agent to do a criminal act: According to section 224, where one person
employs another to do an act which is criminal, the employer is not liable to the agent, either upon an
express or an implied promise, to indemnify him against the consequences of that act.
(v) Right to compensation for injury caused by principal’s neglect [Section 225]: Section 225 provides
that the principal must compensate his agent in respect of injury caused to such agent due to principal’s
neglect or want of skill.
b. Right of indemnification
(iv) Right to indemnity against acts done in good
faith [Section 223]
(i) Principal’s
liability for the Acts • Principal liable for the acts of agents which are within the
of the Agent [Section scope of his authority.
226]:
• can be separated from the part which is beyond his authority,
(ii) Principal’s so much only of what he does as is within his authority is
liability when agent binding as between him and his principal.
exceeds authority
[Section 227]: • cannot be separated from what is within it, the principal is not
bound to recognize the transaction.
(iii) Consequences of • Any notice given to or information obtained by the agent,, have
notice given to agent the same legal consequence as if it had been given to or
[Section 229]: obtained by the principal.
• Misrepresentations made, or frauds committed, by agents
acting in the course of their business for their principals, have
(iv) Principal’s the same effect on agreements made by such agents as if
liability for the such misrepresentations or frauds had been made, or
agent’s fraud, committed, by the principals;
misrepresentation or
torts [Section 238]: • but misrepresentations made, or frauds committed, by agents,
in matters which do not fall within their authority, do not
affect their principals.
EXCEPTIONS:
(1) Where the contract is made by an agent for the sale or purchase of goods for a merchant resident
abroad/foreign principal:
(2) Where the agent does not disclose the name of his principal or undisclosed principal; (Principal
unnamed):
(3) Non-existent or incompetent principal: Where the principal, though disclosed, cannot be sued, the
agent is presumed to be personally liable.
(4) Pretended agent – if the agent pretends but is not an actual agent, and the principal does not rectify
the act but disowns it, the pretended agent will be himself liable (Section 235).
(5) When agent exceeds authority- When the agent exceeds his authority, misleads the third person in
believing that the agent he has the requisite authority.
a. Revocation: An agency may be terminated by the principal revoking the authority of the agent.
Principal may revoke the authority given to his agent at any time before the authority has been exercised
so as to bind the principal [Section 203].
The principal cannot revoke the authority of his agent after the authority has been partly exercised.
Compensation for revocation by principal [Section 205]: If there is premature revocation of agency
without sufficient cause, the principal must compensate the agent, for such revocation.
b. Renunciation by agent [Section 206]: An agent may renounce the business of agency in the same
manner in which the principal has the right of revocation.
c. Completion of business: An agency is automatically and by operation of law terminated when its
business is completed.
d. Death or insanity: An agency is determined automatically on the death or insanity of the principal or
the agent.
f. On expiry of time: Where an agent has been appointed for a fixed term, the expiration of the term puts
an end to the agency.
When the agent is personally interested in the subject matter of agency the agency becomes irrevocable.
The termination of the authority of an agent does not, so far as regards the agent, take effect before it
becomes known to him, or, so far as regards third persons, before it becomes known to them.
CHAPTER-3
THE SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930
UNIT – 1: FORMATION OF
THE CONTRACT OF SALE
Sale of Goods before Sale of Goods Act, 1930
1.2 DEFINITIONS
“Goods” include both tangible goods and intangible goods like goodwill, copyrights, patents, trademarks
etc. Stock and shares, gas, steam, water, electricity and decree of the court are also considered to be
goods.
Classification of Goods
Contigent Goods
Delivery means voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another [Section 2(2)].
(i) Actual delivery: When the goods are Physically Delivered to the buyer. This is the most common
method of delivery.
(ii) Constructive delivery: When transfer of goods is affected without any change in the custody or actual
possession of the thing as in the case of delivery by attornment (acknowledgement)
(iii) Symbolic delivery: When there is a delivery of a thing in token of a transfer of something else, i.e.,
like bill of lading or railway receipt or delivery orders or the key of a warehouse. Where actual delivery is
not possible, there may be delivery of the means of getting possession of the goods.
(D) “Document of title to goods” any other document used in the ordinary course of business as proof of
the possession or control of goods. [Section 2(4)] Example: Bill of lading, dock warrant, warehouse
keeper’s certificate, wharfinger’s certificate, railway receipt, warrant, an order of delivery of goods.
However, there is a difference between a ‘document showing title’ and ‘document of title’.
(E) Mercantile Agent [Section 2(9)]: It means an agent has, as such agent, authority either to sell goods
or to consign goods for the purpose of sale or to buy goods or to raise money on the security of the goods.
Eg. Brokers and Auctioneers
(F) Property [Section 2(11)]: ‘Property’ here means ‘Ownership’ or general property. It means the general
property (right of ownership-in-goods) and not merely a special property.
The property in the goods means the general property i.e., all ownership right of the goods. Note that the
‘General Property’ in goods is to be distinguished from a ‘Special Property’.
Example 15: If A who owns certain goods pledges them to B, A has general property in the goods,
whereas B has special property or interest in the goods to the extent of the amount of advance he
has made. In case A fails to repay the amount borrowed on pledging the goods, then B may sell
his goods but not otherwise.
(G) Insolvent [Section 2(8)]: A person is said to be insolvent when he ceases to pay his debts in the
ordinary course of business, or cannot pay his debts as they become due, whether he has committed an
act of insolvency or not.
(H) Price [Section 2(10)]: Price means the Money Consideration for a sale of goods. It is the value of
goods expressed in monetary terms. It is the essential requirement to make a contract of sale of goods.
“A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer
the property in goods to the buyer for a price”.
Sale: In Sale, the property in goods is transferred Agreement to Sell: In an agreement to sell, the
from seller to the buyer IMMEDIATELY. ownership of the goods is not transferred
immediately. It is intending to transfer at a
future date upon the completion of certain
conditions thereon.
Thus, whether a contract of sale of goods is an absolute sale or an agreement to sell, depends on the fact
whether it contemplates immediate transfer from the seller to the buyer or the transfer is to take place
at a future date.
The following elements must co-exist so as to constitute a contract of sale of goods under the Sale of
Goods Act, 1930:
All other
Transfer of May be absolute essential
property or conditional elements of a
valid contract
Remedies for breach The seller can sue the buyer for the The aggrieved party can sue for
price. damages only.
Burden of risk Risk of loss is that of buyer Risk of loss is that of seller.
Nature of rights Creates Jus in rem means right Creates Jus in personam
against the whole world.
Right of resale The seller cannot resell the goods The seller may resell
In case of insolvency of The official assignee will not be The official assignee will acquire
Seller able to take over the goods. control over the goods.
Burden of Risk of The seller takes the risk of any loss The owner takes no such risk.
insolvency of the resulting from the insolvency of the
buyer buyer
Transfer of title The buyer can pass a good title to a The hirer cannot pass any title even to a
bona fide purchaser. bona fide purchaser.
Resale The buyer in sale can resell. The hire purchaser cannot resell.
(ii) Sale and Bailment: A ‘bailment’ is the delivery of goods for some specific purpose under a contract
on the condition that the same goods are to be returned when the purpose is accomplished.
Consideration The consideration is the price in terms The consideration may be gratuitous or
of money. non-gratuitous.
Goods perishing before making of contract (Section 7): the contract is VOID
Goods perishing before sale but after agreement to sell (Section 8): the agreement is VOID.
1. Where there is an agreement to sell goods on the terms that price has to be fixed by the third party
and he either does not or cannot make such valuation, the agreement will be VOID.
2. In case the third party is prevented by the default of either party from fixing the price, the party at
fault will be liable to the damages to the other party who is not at fault.
Section Description
UNIT- 1
CHAPTER-3
THE SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930
UNIT – 2:- CONDITIONS &
WARRANTIES
Right in case of The aggrieved party can repudiate the The aggrieved party can claim
breach contract. only damages .
Conversion of A breach of condition may be treated as a A breach of warranty cannot be
stipulations breach of warranty. treated as a breach of condition.
In the following cases, a contract is not avoided even on account of a breach of a condition:
(i) Where the buyer altogether waives the performance of the condition. A party may for his own benefit,
waive a stipulation. It should be a voluntary waiver by buyer.
(ii) Where the buyer elects to treat the breach of the conditions, as one of a warranty. That is to say, he
may claim only damages instead of repudiating the contract. Here, the buyer has not waived the
condition but decided to treat it as a warranty.
(iii) Where the contract is non-severable and the buyer has accepted either the whole goods or any part
thereof. For Eg. If basmati rice and lower quality rice mixed together, the contract becomes non severable.
(iv) Where the fulfilment of any condition or warranty is excused by law by reason of impossibility or
otherwise.
IMPLIED CONDITIONS
• Bought by Description
(vi) Condition as to • Seller should be a dealer in the goods of that description.
Merchantability
IMPLIED WARRANTIES
Implied Warranties: It is a warranty which the law implies into the contract of sale. In other words, it is
the stipulation which has not been included in the contract of sale in express words. But the law
presumes that the parties have incorporated it into their contract
1. Warranty as to undisturbed possession [Section 14(b)]: An implied warranty that the buyer shall have
and enjoy quiet possession of the goods. That is to say, if the buyer having got possession of the goods, is
later on disturbed in his possession, he is entitled to sue the seller for the breach of the warranty.
2. Warranty as to non-existence of encumbrances [Section 14(c)]: An implied warranty that the goods
shall be free from any charge or encumbrance in favour of any third party not declared or known to the
buyer before or at the time the contract is entered into.
3. Warranty as to quality or fitness by usage of trade [Section 16(3)]: An implied warranty as to quality
or fitness for a particular purpose may be annexed or attached by the usage of trade.
Regarding implied condition or warranty as to the quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods
supplied, the rule is ‘let the buyer beware’ i.e., the seller is under no duty to reveal unflattering truths
about the goods sold, but this rule has certain exceptions.
4. Disclosure of dangerous nature of goods: Where the goods are dangerous in nature and the buyer is
ignorant of the danger, the seller must warn the buyer of the probable danger. If there is a breach of
warranty, the seller may be liable in damages.
Exceptions: The doctrine of Caveat Emptor is, however, subject to the following exceptions:
1. Fitness as to quality or use: Where the buyer makes known to the seller the particular purpose for
which the goods are required, so as to show that he relies on the seller’s skill or judgment and the
goods are of a description which is in the course of seller’s business to supply, it is the duty of the
seller to supply such goods as are reasonably fit for that purpose [Section 16 (1)].
if goods are of single purpose use, then no need to make known. if multiple purpose,
then he needs to make the particular purpose known to hold seller liable
2. Goods purchased under patent or brand name: In case where the goods are purchased under its
patent name or brand name, there is no implied condition that the goods shall be fit for any particular
purpose [Section 16(1)]. Here, the buyer is relying on the particular brand name. (No Exception)
3. Goods sold by description: Where the goods are sold by description there is an implied condition that
the goods shall correspond with the description [Section 15]. If it is not so, then seller is responsible.
4. Goods of Merchantable Quality: Where the goods are bought by description from a seller who deals
in goods of that description there is an implied condition that the goods shall be of merchantable
quality. The rule of Caveat Emptor is not applicable for latent defects.
5. Sale by sample: Where the goods are bought by sample, this rule of Caveat Emptor does not apply if
the bulk does not correspond with the sample [Section 17].
6. Goods by sample as well as description: Where the goods are bought by sample as well as
description, the rule of Caveat Emptor is not applicable in case the goods do not correspond with both
the sample and description or either of the condition [Section 15].
7. Trade Usage: An implied warranty or condition as to quality or fitness for a particular purpose may
be annexed by the usage of trade and if the seller deviates from that, this rule of Caveat Emptor is not
applicable [Section 16(3)].
8. Seller actively conceals a defect or is guilty of fraud: Where the seller sells the goods by making
some misrepresentation or fraud and the buyer relies on it or when the seller actively conceals some
defect in the goods so that the same could not be discovered by the buyer on a reasonable
examination, then the rule of Caveat Emptor will not apply.
UNIT- 2
11 Stipulation as to time
12 Condition & warranty
12 (2) Definition of Condition
12 (3) Definition of Warranty
13 When condition to be treated as warranty
14 Condition as to title
14 (b) Warranty as to undisturbed possession
14 (c) Warranty as to non-existence of encumbrances
15 Sale by Description
16 Implied conditions as to quality or fitness
16 (1) Conditions as to quality or fitness
16 (2) Condition as to Merchantability
16 (3) Warranty as to quality or fitness by usage of trade
17 Sale by Sample
CHAPTER-3
THE SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930
UNIT – 3:- TRANSFER OF
OWNERSHIP AND DELIVERY
OF GOODS
INTRODUCTION
Sale of goods involves transfer of ownership of property from seller to buyer. It is essential to determine
the time at which the ownership passes from the seller to the buyer. The general rule is that risk prima
facie passes with the property.
The rules regarding transfer of property in goods depend on two basic factors:
(a) Identification of Goods: Section 18 provides that where there is a contract of sale for Unascertained
Goods, the property in goods cannot pass to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained. The
buyer can get the ownership right on the goods only when the goods are specific and ascertained.
(b) Intentions of parties: The property in goods is transferred to the buyer at such time as the parties to
the contract intend it to be transferred. [section 19(1)]
Section 19(2) further provides that for the purpose of ascertaining the intention of the parties regard
shall be:
A. Property (Specific or ascertained goods) passes when intended to pass (Section 19):
Where there is a contract for the sale of specific or ascertained goods, the property in them is
transferred to the buyer at such time as the parties to the contract intend it to be transferred. [sub-
section (1)]
For the purpose of ascertaining the intention of the parties, regard shall be had to the terms of the
contract, the conduct of the parties and the circumstances of the case. [sub-section (2)]
Unless a different intention appears, the rules contained in Sections 20 to 24 are rules for ascertaining
the intention of the parties as to the time at which the property in the goods is to pass to the buyer.
[sub-section (3)]
1. Specific goods in a deliverable state (Section 20): Where there is an Unconditional Contract for the sale
of Specific Goods in a deliverable state, the property in the goods passes to the buyer when the contract
is made, and it is immaterial whether the time of payment of the price or the time of delivery of the
goods, or both, is postponed. Here, the condition is goods must be ready for delivery.
2. Specific goods to be put into a deliverable state (Section 21): Where there is a contract for the sale of
Specific Goods and the seller is bound to do something to the goods for the purpose of putting them into a
deliverable state, the property does not pass until such thing is done and the buyer has NOTICE thereof.
3. Specific goods in a deliverable state, when the seller has to do anything thereto in order to ascertain
price (Section 22): Where there is a contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, but the
seller is bound to weigh, measure, test or do some other act or thing with reference to the goods for the
purpose of ascertaining the price, the property does not pass until such act or thing is done and the buyer
has NOTICE thereof.
B. Unascertained goods
Where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained goods, no property in the goods is transferred to
the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained. [Section 18]
1. Sale of unascertained goods by description and Appropriation [Section 23(1)]: Appropriation of goods
involves selection of goods with the intention of using them in performance of the contract and with the
mutual consent of the seller and the buyer.
2. Delivery of the goods to the carrier [Section 23(2)]: Where, in pursuance of the contract, the seller
delivers the goods to the buyer or to a carrier or other bailee (whether named by the buyer or not) for the
purpose of transmission to the buyer, and does not reserve the right of disposal, he is deemed to have
unconditionally appropriated the goods to the contract.
When goods are delivered to the buyer on approval or “on sale or return” or other similar terms, the
property therein passes to the buyer-
(a) when he (Buyer) signifies his approval or acceptance to the seller or does any other act adopting
the transaction;
(b) if he does not signify his approval or acceptance to the seller but retains the goods without giving
notice of rejection, then, if a time has been fixed for the return of the goods, on the expiration of
such time, and, if no time has been fixed, on the expiration of a reasonable time; or
(c) he does something to the good which is equivalent to accepting the goods e.g. he pledges or sells
the goods.
It may be noted that where the goods have been delivered by a person on “sale or return” on the terms
that the goods were to remain the property of the seller till they are paid for, the property therein does
not pass to the buyer until the terms are complied with, i.e., cash is paid for.
This section preserves the right of disposal of goods to secure that the price is paid before the property in
goods passes to the buyer.
Where there is contract of sale of specific goods or where the goods have been subsequently appropriated
to the contract, the seller may, by the terms of the contract or appropriation, as the case may be, reserve
the right to dispose of the goods, until certain conditions have been fulfilled.
i. If delivery has been delayed by the fault of the seller or the buyer, the goods shall be at the risk of
the party in default, as regards loss which might not have arisen but for the default.
ii. The duties and liabilities of the seller or the buyer as bailee of goods for the other party remain
unaffected even when the risk has passed generally.
If this rule is enforced rigidly then the innocent buyers may be put to loss in many cases. Therefore, to
protect the interests of innocent buyers, a number of exceptions have been provided to this rule.
Exceptions: In the following cases, a non-owner can convey better title to the bona fide purchaser of
goods for value.
(1) Sale by a Mercantile Agent: A sale made by a mercantile agent of the goods for document of title to
goods would pass a good title to the buyer in the following circumstances; namely;
(a) If he was in possession of the goods or documents with the consent of the owner;
(b) If the sale was made by him when acting in the ordinary course of business as a mercantile
agent; and
(c) If the buyer had acted in good faith and has at the time of the contract of sale, no notice of
the fact that the seller had no authority to sell (Proviso to Section 27).
(2) Sale by one of the joint owners (Section 28): If one of several joint owners of goods has the sole
possession of goods by permission of the co-owners.
(3) Sale by a person in possession under voidable contract: A buyer would acquire a good title to the
goods sold to him by a seller who had obtained possession of the goods under a contract voidable on the
ground of coercion, fraud, misrepresentation or undue influence provided that the contract had not been
rescinded until the time of the sale (Section 29).
(4) Sale by one who has already sold the goods but continues in possession thereof: If a person has sold
goods but continues to be in possession of them or of the documents of title to them, he may sell them to
a third person, and if such person obtains the delivery thereof in good faith .
(5) Sale by buyer obtaining possession before the property in the goods has vested in him: Where a buyer
with the consent of the seller obtains possession of the goods before the property in them has passed to
him, he may sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of the goods to a third person, and if such person obtains
delivery of the goods in good faith and without notice of the lien or other right of the original seller in
respect of the goods, he would get a good title to them [Section 30(2)].
However, a person in possession of goods under a ‘hire-purchase’ agreement which gives him only an
option to buy is not covered within the section unless it amounts to a sale.
(6) Effect of Estoppel: Where the owner is estopped by the conduct from denying the seller’s authority to
sell, the transferee will get a good title as against the true owner.
(7) Sale by an unpaid seller: Where an unpaid seller who had exercised his right of lien or stoppage in
transit resells the goods, the buyer acquires a good title to the goods as against the original buyer.
i. Sale by an Official Receiver or Liquidator of the Company will give the purchaser a valid title.
ii. Purchase of goods from a finder of goods will get a valid title under circumstances
iii. A sale by pawnee can convey a good title to the buyer
Delivery of goods is of three types: (a) Actual Delivery (b) Symbolic delivery (c) Constructive Delivery
The Sale of good Act, 1930 prescribes the following rules of delivery of goods:
(i) Delivery (Section 33): Delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree
shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or
of any person authorised to hold them on his behalf.
(ii) Effect of part delivery: A delivery of part of goods, in progress of the delivery of the whole has the
same effect. (Section 34) ( except when intention is to serve it from the whole of the goods )
(iii) Buyer to apply for delivery: Apart from any express contract, the seller of goods is not bound to
deliver them until the buyer applies for delivery. (Section 35)
(iv) Place of delivery: Whether it is for the buyer to take possession of the goods or for the seller to send
them to the buyer is a question depending in each case on the contract, express or implied, between the
parties.
(v) Time of delivery: Where under the contract of sale, the seller is bound to send the goods to the buyer,
but no time for sending them is fixed, the seller is bound to send them within a REASONABLE TIME.
(vi) Goods in possession of a third party: Where the goods at the time of sale are in possession of a third
person, there is no delivery unless and until such third person acknowledges to the buyer that he holds
the goods on his behalf. ( Constructive Delivery )
(vii) Time for tender of delivery: Demand or tender of delivery may be treated as ineffectual unless made
at a reasonable hour. What is reasonable hour is a question of fact. [Section 36(4)].
(viii) Expenses for delivery: The expenses of and incidental to putting the goods into a deliverable state
must be borne by the seller in the absence of a contract to the contrary. [Section 36(5)].
(ix) Delivery of wrong quantity [Section 37]: Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods
less than he contracted to sell, the buyer may reject them, but if the buyer accepts the goods so delivered
he shall pay for them at the contract rate. [Subsection (1)]
Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods larger than he contracted to sell, the buyer may
accept the goods included in the contract and reject the rest, or he may reject the whole. If the buyer
accepts the whole of the goods so delivered, he shall pay for them at the contract rate. [Sub-section (2)]
(x) Instalment deliveries: Unless otherwise agreed, the buyer is not bound to accept delivery in
instalments.
(xi) Delivery to carrier: Subject to the terms of contract, the delivery of the goods to the carrier for
transmission to the buyer, is prima facie deemed to be delivery to the buyer. [Section 39(1)]
(xii) Deterioration during transit: Where goods are delivered at a distant place, the liability for
deterioration necessarily incidental to the course of transit will fall on the buyer, though the seller agrees
to deliver at his own risk. (Section 40)
(xiii) Buyer’s right to examine the goods: Where goods are delivered to the buyer, who has not previously
examined them, he is entitled to a reasonable opportunity of examining them in order to ascertain
whether they are in conformity with the contract.
Buyer not bound to return rejected goods (Section 43): Unless otherwise agreed, where goods are delivered
to the buyer and he refuses to accept them, having the right so to do, he is not bound to return them to
the seller, but it is sufficient if he intimates to the seller that he refuses to accept them.
Liability of buyer for neglecting or refusing delivery of goods (Section 44): When the seller is ready and
willing to deliver the goods and requests the buyer to take delivery, and the buyer does not within a
reasonable time after such request take delivery of the goods, he is liable to the seller for any loss
occasioned by his neglect or refusal.
The seller can also repudiate the Contract
UNIT- 3
HAPTER- 3
THE SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930
UNIT – 4:- UNPAID SELLER
(a) The whole of the price has not been paid or tendered and the seller had an immediate right of
action for the price.
(b) When a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been received as conditional payment,
and the condition on which it was received has not been fulfilled by reason of the DISHONOUR of the
instrument or otherwise.
(a) a lien on the goods for the price while he is in possession of them;
(b) in case of the insolvency of the buyer a right of stopping the goods in transit after he has
parted with the possession of them;
(c) a right of re-sale as limited by this Act. [Sub-section (1)]
An unpaid seller has been expressly given the rights against the goods as well as the buyer personally
which are discussed as under:
(a) Rights of an unpaid seller against the goods: The right of unpaid seller against goods can be
categorized under two headings.
Rights of lien: The unpaid seller’s lien is a possessory lien i.e. the lien can be exercised as long as
the seller remains in possession of the goods.
Exercise of right of lien: This right can be exercised by him in the following cases only:
Seller may exercise his right of lien even where he is in possession of the goods as agent or bailee
for the buyer.
Part delivery (Section 48): Where an unpaid seller has made part delivery of the goods, he may exercise
his right of lien on the remainder.
Termination of lien (Section 49): The unpaid seller loses his right of lien under the following
circumstances:
a) When he delivers the goods to a carrier or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer
without reserving the right of disposal of the goods.
b) Where the buyer or his agent lawfully obtains possession of the goods.
c) Where seller has waived the right of lien.
d) By Estoppel i.e., where the seller so conducts himself that he leads third parties to believe that the
lien does not exist.
Exception: The unpaid seller of the goods, having a lien thereon, does not lose his lien by reason only that
he has obtained a decree for the price of the goods. (This means even if the seller has taken a price for
the goods under a court case, he can still exercise his right to lien on those goods.)
Meaning of right of stoppage in transit (Section 50): The right of stoppage in transit means the right of
stopping the goods while they are in transit, to regain the possession and to retain them till the full price
is paid.
However, the right of stoppage in transit is exercised only when the following conditions are fulfilled:
The right of stoppage in transit is lost when transit comes to an end. Transit comes to an end in the
following cases:
(1) The Unpaid Seller may exercise his right of stoppage in transit either by taking actual possession of
the goods, or by giving notice of his claim to the carrier or other bailee in whose possession the goods are.
Such notice may be given either to the person in actual possession of the goods or to his principal. In the
latter case, the notice, to be effectual, shall be given at such time and in such circumstances, that the
principal, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, may communicate it to his servant or agent in time to
prevent a delivery to the buyer.
(2) When notice of stoppage in transit is given by the seller to the carrier or other bailee in possession of
the goods, he shall re-deliver the goods to, or according to the directions of, the seller. The expenses of
such re-delivery shall be borne by the seller.
(i) The essence of a right of lien is to Retain possession whereas the right of stoppage in transit is
right to Regain possession.
(ii) Seller should be in possession of goods under lien while in stoppage in transit (i) seller should
have parted with the possession (ii) possession should be with a carrier & buyer has not acquired
the possession.
(iii)Right of lien can be exercised even when the buyer is not INSOLVENT but it is not the case with
right of stoppage in transit.
(iv) Right of stoppage in transit begins when the right of lien ends.
(v) Right of lien comes to an end as soon as the goods go out of the possession of the seller but the
right of stopping in transit comes to an end as soon as the goods are delivered to the buyer.
Exceptions where unpaid seller’s right of lien and stoppage in transit are defeated:
(a) When the seller has assented to the sale, mortgage or other disposition of the goods made by the
buyer.
(b) When a document of title to goods has been transferred to the buyer and the buyer transfers the
documents to a person who has bought goods in good faith and for value i.e. for price.
The right of resale is a very valuable right given to an unpaid seller. In the absence of this right, the
unpaid seller’s other rights against the goods that is lien and the stoppage in transit would not have been
of much use.
The unpaid seller can exercise the right to re-sell the goods under the following conditions:
(i) Where the goods are of a perishable nature: In such a case, the buyer need not be informed of the
intention of resale.
(ii) Where he gives notice to the buyer of his intention to re-sell the goods: If after the receipt of such
notice the buyer fails within a reasonable time to pay or tender the price, the seller may resell the goods.
It may be noted that in such cases, on the resale of the goods, the seller is also entitled to:
(a) Recover the difference between the contract price and resale price, from the original buyer, as
damages.
(b) Retain the profit if the resale price is higher than the contract price.
(iii) Where an unpaid seller who has exercised his right of lien or stoppage in transit resells the goods:
The subsequent buyer acquires the good title thereof as against the original buyer, despite the fact that
the notice of re-sale has not been given by the seller to the original buyer.
(iv) A re-sale by the seller where a right of re-sale is expressly reserved in a contract of sale: Sometimes,
it is expressly agreed between the seller and the buyer that in case the buyer makes default in payment
of the price, the seller will resell the goods to some other person. It may be noted that in such cases, the
seller is not required to give notice of resale.
(v) Where the property in goods has not passed to the buyer: The unpaid seller has in addition to his
remedies a right of withholding delivery of the goods. This right is similar to lien and is called “quasi-
lien”. This is the additional right used in case of agreement to sell.
(a) Where under a contract of sale, the property in the goods has passed to the buyer and the buyer
wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay for the goods according to the terms of the contract, the
seller may sue him for the price of the goods. [Section 55(1)] (This is the case of contract of
sale)
(b) Where under a contract of sale, the price is payable on a certain day irrespective of delivery and
the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay such price, the seller may sue him for the price
although the property in the goods has not passed and the goods have not been appropriated to
the contract. [Section 55(2)]. (This is the case of agreement to sell)
Where the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to accept and pay for the goods, the seller may sue him
for damages for non-acceptance.
Where the buyer repudiates the contract before the date of delivery, the seller may treat the contract as
rescinded and sue damages for the breach. This is known as the ‘rule of anticipatory breach of contract’.
Where there is specific agreement between the seller and the buyer as to interest on the price of the
goods from the date on which payment becomes due, the seller may recover interest from the buyer.
In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the Court may award interest to the seller in a suit by him
at such rate as it thinks fit.
If the seller commits a breach of contract, the buyer gets the following rights against the seller:
1. Damages for non-delivery [Section 57]: Where the seller wrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the
goods to the buyer, the buyer may sue the seller for damages for non-delivery.
2. Suit for Specific Performance (Section 58): Where the seller commits of breach of the contract of sale,
the buyer can appeal to the court for specific performance. The court can order for specific performance
only when the goods are ascertained or specific.
(a) The contract must be for the sale of specific and ascertained goods.
(b) The power of the court to order specific performance is subject to provisions of Specific Relief
Act of 1963.
(c) It empowers the court to order specific performance where damages would not be an adequate
remedy.
(d) It will be granted as remedy if goods are of special nature or are unique.
3. Suit for breach of warranty (Section 59): Where there is breach of warranty on the part of the seller,
or where the buyer elects to treat breach of condition as breach of warranty, the buyer is not entitled to
reject the goods only on the basis of such breach of warranty. But he may –
(i) sue the seller for the breach of warranty in diminution or extinction of the price; or
4. Repudiation of contract before due date (Section 60): Where either party to a contract of sale
repudiates the contract before the date of delivery, the other may either treat the contract as subsisting
and wait till the date of delivery, or he may treat the contract as rescinded and sue for damages for the
breach.
1) Nothing in this Act shall affect the right of the seller or the buyer to recover interest or special
damages, in any case where by law interest or special damages may be recoverable, or to recover
the money paid where the consideration for the payment of it has failed.
2) In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the court may award interest at such rate as it
thinks fit on the amount of the price to the buyer in a suit filed by him for the refund of the price.
An ‘Auction Sale’ is a mode of selling property by inviting bids publicly and the property is sold to the
highest bidder. An auctioneer is an agent governed by the Law of Agency.
Legal Rules of Auction sale: Section 64 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 provides following rules to regulate
the sale by auction:
(a) Where goods are sold in lots: Where goods are put up for sale in lots, each lot is prima facie deemed
to be subject of a separate contract of sale.
(b) Completion of the contract of sale: The sale is complete when the auctioneer announces its
completion by the fall of hammer or in any other customary manner. Until such announcement is made,
any bidder may retract from his bid.
(c) Right to bid may be reserved: Right to bid may be reserved expressly by or on behalf of the seller and
where such a right is expressly reserved, but not otherwise, the seller or any one person on his behalf may
bid at the auction.
(d) Where the sale is not notified by the seller: Where the sale is not notified to be subject to a right to
bid on behalf of the seller, it shall not be lawful for the seller to bid himself or to employ any person to
bid at such sale.
(e) Reserved price: The sale may be notified to be subject to a reserve or upset price; and
(f) Pretended bidding: If the seller makes use of pretended bidding to raise the price, the sale is voidable
at the option of the buyer.
The buyer would have to pay the increased price where the tax increases and may derive the benefit of
reduction if taxes are curtailed.
UNIT- 4
45 UNPAID SELLER
46 UNPAID SELLER'S RIGHT
47 SELLER'S LIEN
48 PART DELIVERY
49 TERMINATION OF LIEN
50 RIGHT TO STOPPAGE IN TRANSIT
51 DURATION OF TRANSIT
52 HOW STOPPAGE IN TRANSIT IS EFFECTED
53 EFFECTS OF SUB-SALE OR PLEDGE BY BUYER
54 RIGHT OF RE-SALE
55 SUIT FOR PRICE
56 SUIT FOR DAMAGE FOR NON-ACCEPTANCE
57 DAMAGES FOR NON-DELIVERY
58 SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
59 SUIT FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY
60 REPUDIATION OF CONTRACT BEFORE DUE DATE
61 SUIT FOR INTEREST
64 AUCTION SALE
64 (a) INCLUSION OF INCREASED OR DECREASED TAXES IN CONTRACT OF SALE
CHAPTER-4
UNIT – 1: GENERAL
NATURE OF
PARTNERSHIP
CHAPTER-4
UNIT – 1: GENERAL
NATURE OF
PARTNERSHIP
Definitions (Section 4)
‘‘Partnership’ is the relation between persons who have agreed
to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of
them acting for all.
The definition of the partnership contains the following five elements which must co-exist before a
partnership can come into existence.
• voluntary
• contractual
AGREEMENT • may be oral or in writing
- it is only a
prima facie
evidence and
Profit Sharing
not conclusive
evidence - Existence of
Mutual Agency
Mutual Agency
for Example: which is the
- by a lender of cardinal
money to principle of - partnership
arises from
Agreement
persons engaged partnership law
or about to contract
engage in any
business, - Each partner
carrying on the - not from
- by a servant business is the status
or agent as principal as well e.g. HUF
remuneration, as an agent of
- by a widow or other partners.
child of a
deceased
partner, as - So, the act of
annuity, or one partner
done on behalf
- by a previous of firm, binds
owner or part all the partners.
owner of the
business, as And act of other partners
consideration done on behalf of the firm
for the sale of binds the partner
the goodwill
Winding up A partnership firm can be dissolved at wind up by the NCLT or ROC only.
any time if all the partners agree.
Relationship Persons forming a partnership are Persons forming a club are called Members.
called partners.
Agency a partner is an agent for other A member of a club is not the agent of
partners. other members
Interest in Partner has interest in the property A member of a club has no interest in the
the property of the firm. property of the club.
Dissolution A change in the partners of the firm A change in the membership of a club does
affects its existence. not affect its existence.
Implied agency A partner is the agent of the other A co-owner is not the agent of
partners. other co-owners.
Death of a member leads to the Dissolution does not Leads to dissolution of HUF
Authority to bind Every partner can, bind the The Karta or the manager Only
firm.
Calling for A partner is entitled to ask A member is not entitled to ask for
accounts on for account account
closure
Share in the Defined Share as per Deed In a HUF, no coparceners has a definite
business share. His interest is a fluctuating one.
Kinds of Partnership
With Regard of With Regard to the
Duration extent of Business
if continued
No Provision further then For a For a
No Fixed for it is treated Particular Particular
Period Determination as adventure Undertaking
partnership
at will
Partnership Deed
Features Contents
• No Particular Format • Name of the partnership firm.
• Names of all the partners.
• In Writing or Formed Verbally • Nature and place of the business.
• Date of commencement.
• Registration & Stamping is • Duration.
optional • Capital contribution.
• Profit Sharing ratio.
• if Partnership comprises of • Admission and Retirement of a
Immovable Property, then partner.
• must be in Writing, Stamped & • Rates of interest on Capital
registered. • Drawings and loans.
• Provisions for dissolution of the firm.
• Salaries or commissions, payable if
It is the document in writing, any.
containing the various terms • Provisions for expulsion of a partner.
and conditions of partnership as • A partnership firm may add or delete
to the relation between partners. any provision according to the needs.
• Partner by agreetment
Active or • Actively Participates in firm
Ostensible • Must give a Public notice in case of Retirement
Partner
• Partner by agreetment
Sleeping • Does not Actively Participates in firm
or • Share Profit & Losses
Dormant • Liable to Third Parties
Partner • No Need to give a Public notice in case of Retirement
4. THE CONDUCT OF THE BUSINESS (SECTION 12): Subject to contract between the partners-
If contract to the contrary, then court will not interfere, unless this right used in breach or trust
5. MUTUAL RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES (SECTION 13): Subject to contract between the partners-
The property which is deemed as belonging to the firm, in the absence of any agreement showing
contrary intention, is comprised of the following items:
(i) all property, rights and interests which partners may have brought into the common stock
(ii) all the property, rights and interest acquired or purchased by or for the firm, or for the
The determination of the question whether a particular property is or is not ‘property’ of the firm
ultimately depends on the Real Intention or Agreement of the partners.
(a) he shall account for that profit and pay it to the firm;
(b) he shall pay to the firm all profits made by him in that business.
In the absence of any usage or custom of trade to the contrary, the implied authority of a partner does
not empower him to-
(b) open a banking account on behalf of the firm in his own name;
It may be noted that the above-mentioned extension or restriction is only possible with the consent
of all the partners. Any one partner, or even a majority of the partners, cannot restrict or extend the
implied authority.
According to section 21, a partner has authority, in an emergency; to do all such acts for the purpose
of protecting the firm from loss as would be done by a person of ordinary prudence, in his own case,
acting under similar circumstances, and such acts bind the firm.
The partners are jointly and severally responsible to third parties for all acts which come under
the scope of their express or implied authority.
must have been done while he was a partner.
2. LIABILITY OF THE FIRM FOR WRONGFUL ACTS OF A PARTNER (SECTION 26): The firm is liable to the
same extent as the partner for any loss or injury caused to a third party by the wrongful acts of a
partner, if they are done by the partner while acting:
(a) in the ordinary course of the business of the firm
(b) with the authority of the partners.
The fact that the method employed by the partner in doing it was unauthorized or wrongful would not
affect the question.
After coming into the Before coming into the Firm & other partners
custody of the firm custody of the firm will not be liable
Firm & other partners will Firm & other partners will
be liable in both cases. be liable in both cases.
(II) On the dissolution of the firm or on the retirement of the transferring partner, the transferee will
be entitled, against the remaining partners:
(a) to receive the share of the assets of the firm to which the transferring partner was
entitled, and
(b) for the purpose of ascertaining the share, he is entitled to an account as from the date of
the dissolution.
Thus, the dissolution of firm means the discontinuation of the legal relation existing between all the
partners of the firm. But when only one or more partners retires or becomes incapacitated from acting as
a partner due to death, insolvency or insanity, the partnership, i.e. the relationship between such a
partner and other is dissolved, but the rest may decide to continue. In such cases, there is in practice, no
dissolution of the firm. The particular partner goes out, but the remaining partners carry on the business
of the firm, it is called dissolution of PARTNERSHIP. In the case of dissolution of the firm, on the other
hand, the whole firm is dissolved. The partnership terminates as between each and every partner of the
firm.
5. Final closure of It involves final closure of It does not involve final closure
books books of the firm. of the books of the firm.
Dissolution Dissolution
Dissolution Compulsory on the by notice of
by dissolution happening of partnership
Agreement (Section 41): certain at will
(Section 40): contingencies (Section 43)
(Section 42)
by the adjudication of all the partners or of all the partners but one as INSOLVENT; or
by the happening of any event which makes it UNLAWFUL for the business of the firm to be
carried on or for the partners to carry it on in partnership.
(iii) Dissolution on the happening of certain contingencies (Section 42): Subject to contract between
the partners, a firm can be dissolved on the happening of any of the following contingencies-
(1) Where the partnership is at will, the firm may be dissolved by any partner giving notice in
writing to all the other partners of his intention to dissolve the firm.
(2) In case date is mentioned in the Notice: The firm is dissolved as from the date mentioned
in the notice as the date of dissolution, or in case no date is so mentioned, as from the
date of the communication of the notice.
Breach of
Agreement:
Embezzlement,
Erroneous
accounts, holding
excess cash than
authorised to hold
Just and Equitable
grounds:
Deadlock in management,
partners are not in talking
terms, gambling on the
stock market, loss of
substratum
UNIT- 2
UNIT- 3
39 Dissolution of Firm
40 Dissolution by Agreement
41 Compulsory dissolution
42 Dissolution on the happening of certain contingencies
43 Dissolution by notice of partnership at will
44 Dissolution by the Court
45 Liability for acts of partners done after dissolution
46 Right of partners to have business wound up after dissolution
47 Continuing authority of partners for purposes of winding up
48 Mode of Settlement of partnership accounts
49 Payment of firm debts and of separate debts
58 Application for Registration
59 Registration
59A- 1 Late Registration on payment of penalty
69 Consequences of non-registration
01 02 03 04 05
Liability of Allow the
partners will New form of Alternative partners the LLP itself will
be limited to legal business corporate flexibility of be liable for
the extent of entity with business organising the full extent
their capital limited liability vehicle their internal of its assets
contribution structure
IMPORTANT DEFINITIONS
Foreign LLP
[section 2(1)(m)]
LLP
formed
incorporated Establishes
a place of
business WITHIN INDIA
registered
OUTSIDE INDIA
Limited liability
partnership
[Section 2(1)(n)]
Save as otherwise
provided, the shall not apply to a
provisions of the LLP.
Indian Partnership
Act, 1932
4. PARTNERS (SECTION 5)
PARTNERS [SECTION 5]
If at any time the number of partners of a LLP is reduced below two and the LLP
carries on business for more than six months while the number is so reduced
7. CHARACTERISTIC OF LLP
Body Corporate
Perpetual Succession
intangible, invisible
and immortal Artificial Legal Person
Common Seal
Management of
Business
Min. and Max. number
of Partners
Business for Profit Only
E-Filling of Documents
can become a
partner in Indian Foreign LLPs
LLP
Incorporation documents
Two or more persons associated for carrying on a lawful business with a view to profit shall
subscribe their names to an incorporation document;
The incorporation document shall be filed in such manner and with such fees, as may be
prescribed with the Registrar of the State in which the registered office of the LLP is to be
situated; and
Statement to be filed:
▪ There shall be filed along with the incorporation document, a statement in the prescribed form,
▪ Made by either an advocate, or a Company Secretary or a Chartered Accountant or a Cost
Accountant, who is engaged in the formation of the LLP and
▪ By any one who subscribed his name to the incorporation document,
▪ That all the requirements of this Act and the rules made thereunder have been complied with,
▪ In respect of incorporation and matters precedent and incidental thereto.
The Registrar shall retain the incorporation the Registrar and authenticated by his
change of name:
if the central government finds the name to be
undesirable or similar to others:
having a i) direct to change its name. LLP shall change it
common seal, if and send the notice with the CG order to the
it is decided to Registrar within 15 days. After change in
Certificate of incorporation by registrar, the LLP
have one and shall change the name in LLP Agreement
ii) if default by LLP, then CG will allot the name,
Registrar will enter into Registrar and change in
Certificate of Incorporation. then LLP to use that
5. Name (Section 15) name.
Every limited liability partnership shall have either the words as the last words of its name.
No LLP shall be registered by a name which, in the opinion of the Central Government is—
undesirable; or
identical or too nearly resembles to that of any other limited liability partnership or a
company or a registered trade mark of any other person under the Trade Marks Act,
1999.
A person may apply in such form and manner and name of a proposed LLP; or
accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed to name to which a LLP
the Registrar for the reservation of a name set out proposes to change its
in the application as— name.
Separate legal It is a legal entity separate from its It is a group of persons with no
entity members. separate legal entity.
Perpetual
It has perpetual succession. It has no perpetual succession.
succession
Name of the LLP to contain the word No guidelines. The partners can have
Name
limited liability partners (LLP) as suffix. any name as per their choice.
Each partner can bind the LLP by his Each partner can bind the firm as well
Mutual agency
own acts but not the other partners. as other partners by his own acts.
Only designated partners are All partners are responsible for all the
Legal
responsible for all the compliances compliances and penalties under the
compliances
and penalties under this Act. Act.
Regulating Act The LLP Act, 2008. The Companies Act, 2013.
Private company:
Minimum – 2 members
Minimum – 2 members Maximum 200 members
Maximum – No such limit on the Public company:
No. of members in the Act. Minimum – 7 members
members/partners The members of the LLP can be Maximum – No such limit on the
individuals/or body corporate members.
through the nominees. Members can be organizations,
trusts, another business form or
individuals.
Minimum number of
Pvt. Co. – 2 directors
directors/designated Minimum 2 designated partners.
Public co. – 3 directors
partners
CHAPTER-7
NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
1. MEANING OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS
Negotiable Instruments is An Instrument (the word instrument means a document) which is
Freely Transferable (by customs of trade) from one person to another by mere delivery or by
indorsement and delivery. The property in such an instrument passes to a bonafide transferee for value.
The Act does not define the term ‘Negotiable Instruments’. However, Section 13 of the Act provides for
only three kinds of negotiable instruments namely bills of EXCHANGE, PROMISSORY NOTES and CHEQUES,
payable either to order or bearer.
It is to be noted that Hundies, Treasury Bills, Bearer Debentures, Railway Receipts, Delivery
Orders, Bill Of Lading etc. are also considered as negotiable instruments either by mercantile custom
or usage.
1. It is necessarily in writing.
2. It should be signed.
6. Every negotiable instrument must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay money.
7. The sum payable, the time of payment, the payee, must be certain.
8. The instrument should be delivered. Mere drawing of instrument does not create liability.
2. PROMISSORY NOTE
Meaning
According to section 4 of the NI Act, 1881, “A PROMISSORY NOTE' is an instrument in writing (not being a
bank-note or a currency-note) containing an Unconditional Undertaking signed by the maker, to pay a
certain sum of money only to, or to the order of, a certain person, or to the bearer of the instrument.”
1. Maker: The person who makes the promise to pay is called the Maker.
He is the debtor and must sign the instrument.
2. Payee: Payee is the person to whom the amount on the note is payable.
d. A promissory note must be signed by the maker otherwise it is incomplete and ineffective.
g. The MAKER and PAYEE must be certain, definite and different persons.
h. Stamping: A promissory note must be properly stamped in accordance with the provisions of the Indian
Stamp Act and such stamp must be duly cancelled by maker's signatures or initials on such stamp or
otherwise.
3. BILLS OF EXCHANGE
A “Bill Of Exchange” is an instrument in writing containing An Unconditional Order, signed by the maker,
directing a certain person to pay a certain sum of money only to, or to the order of, a certain person or to
the bearer of the instrument.
b. Drawee: The person directed by the drawer to pay is called the 'drawee'. On acceptance of the bill, he
is called an acceptor and is liable for the payment of the bill. His liability is primary and unconditional.
c. Payee: The person named in the instrument, to whom or to whose order the money is, by the
instrument, directed to be paid.
(e) Drawer, drawee, and payee must be certain. ( Two Distinct persons: Drawer and Payee can be the same person )
4. CHEQUE [SECTION 6]
A “CHEQUE” is a bill of exchange drawn on a specified banker and not expressed to be payable otherwise
than on demand and it includes the electronic image of a truncated cheque and a cheque in the
electronic form.
Payable on demand means- It should be payable whenever the holder chooses to present it to the drawee
(the banker). The expression “Banker” includes any person acting as a banker and any post office saving
bank [Section 3]
(a) Cheque in the electronic form-means a cheque drawn in electronic form by using any computer
resource, and signed in a secure system with a digital signature (with/without biometric signature)
and asymmetric crypto system or electronic signature, as the case may be;
(b) “A Truncated Cheque” means a cheque which is truncated during a clearing cycle, either by the
clearing house or by the bank whether paying or receiving payment, immediately on generation of an
electronic image for transmission, substituting the further physical movement of the cheque in writing.
Parties to Cheque
1. Drawer: The person who draws a cheque i.e., makes the cheque (Debtor). His liability is primary and
conditional.
2. Drawee: The specific bank on whom cheque is drawn. He makes the payment of the cheque. In case of
cheque, drawee is always banker.
“drawee in case of need”— When in the bill or in any indorsement thereon, the name of any person is
given in addition to the drawee to be resorted to in case of need such person is called a “drawee in case
of need”.
3. Payee: The person named in the instrument (i.e., the person in whose favour cheque is issued), to
whom or to whose order the money is, by the instrument, directed to be paid, is called the payee.
According to the definition of cheque under section 6, a cheque is a species of bill of exchange. Thus, it
should fulfil:
Bearer Instrument: It is an instrument where the name of the payee is blank or where the name of payee
is specified with the words “or bearer” or where the last indorsement is blank. Such instrument can be
negotiated by mere delivery.
Order Instrument: It is an instrument which is payable to a person or Payable to a person or his order or
Payable to order of a person or where the last indorsement is in full, such instrument can be negotiated
by indorsement and delivery.
“Inland instrument”: A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque drawn or made in India and made
payable in, OR drawn upon any person resident in India shall be deemed to be an inland instrument.
In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the liability of the maker or drawer of a foreign promissory
note or bill of exchange or cheque is regulated in all essential matters by the law of the place where he
made the instrument, and the respective liabilities of the acceptor and indorser by the law of the place
where the instrument is made payable (Section 134).
Example 12: A bill of exchange is drawn by A in Berkley where the rate of interest is 15% and accepted
by B payable in Washington where the rate of interest is 6%. The bill is indorsed in India and is
dishonoured. An action on the bill is brought against B in India. He is liable to pay interest at the rate of
6% only. But if A is charged as drawer, he is liable to pay interest at 15%.
Inchoate Instrument: It means an instrument that is INCOMPLETE in certain respects. The drawer/
maker/ acceptor/ indorser of a negotiable instrument may Sign And Deliver the instrument to another
person in his capacity leaving the instrument, either wholly blank or having written on it the word
incomplete. The principle of this rule of an inchoate instrument is based on the principle of estoppel.
Liability on drawing inchoate instrument: The person signing and delivering the inchoate instrument is
liable both to a holder and holder in due course. However, there is a difference in their respective rights:
“Where an instrument may be construed either as a promissory note or bill of exchange, the
holder may at his election treat it as either, and the instrument shall be thenceforward treated
accordingly.“
Modes of Negotiation
(i) A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable to bearer is negotiable by the delivery thereof.
(ii) A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable to order is negotiable by the holder by
indorsement and delivery thereof.
Delivery of an instrument is essential whether the instrument is payable to bearer or order for effecting
the negotiation. The delivery must be voluntary, and the object of delivery should be to pass the property
in the instrument to the person to whom it is delivered. The delivery can be, actual or constructive.
Actual delivery takes place when the instrument changes hand physically. Constructive Delivery takes
place when the instrument is delivered to the agent, clerk or servant of the endorsee on his behalf or
when the indorser, after indorsement, holds the instrument as an agent of the endorsee.
Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker—
▪ amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honor the cheque, or
▪ that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made
with that bank, Criminal Offence
such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, be punished with imprisonment for
a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque,
or with both.
[A cheque given as gift or donation, or as a security or in discharge of a mere moral obligation, or for an
illegal consideration, would be outside the purview of this section]
When section 138 shall be not apply: unless the below given conditions are complied with—
(a) Cheque presented within validity period: The cheque has been presented to the bank
within a period of 3 months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of
its validity, whichever is earlier.
(b) Demand for the payment through the notice: the payee or the holder in due course
of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the payment of the said
amount of money by giving a notice, in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, within 30
days of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the
cheque as unpaid, and
(c) Failure of drawer to make payment: the drawer of such cheque fails to make the
payment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the
holder in due course of the cheque, within 15 days of the receipt of the said notice.
Explanation: For the purpose of this section, “debt or other liability” means a legally enforceable debt.
Therefore we may conclude that compliant can be filed after 45 days of dishonour of the cheque i.e., 30
days of notice period +15 days of the receipt of the said notice.
A Post-Dated Cheque is deemed to have been drawn on the date it bears and the three months period for
the purposes of section 138 is to be counted from that date.
DEFENCE WHICH MAY NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION 138 [SECTION 140]
It shall not be a defence in a prosecution of an offence under section 138 that the drawer had no reason
to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonoured on presentment for the
reasons stated in that section.
8. PRESENTMENT OF INSTRUMENTS
Presentment for acceptance [Section 61]
A bill of exchange payable after sight must [if no time or place is specified therein for
presentment] be presented to the drawee thereof for acceptance [if he can, after
reasonable search, be found] by a person entitled to demand acceptance, within a
reasonable time after it is drawn, and in business hours on a business day.
In default of such presentment, no party thereto is liable thereon to the person making such default. If
the drawee cannot, after reasonable search, be found, the bill is dishonoured.
The holder must, if so required by the drawee of a bill of exchange presented to him for acceptance, allow
the drawee 48 hours (exclusive of public holidays) to consider whether he will accept it.
Presentment for payment must be made during the usual hours of business, and, if at a banker's within
banking hours.
Presentment for payment of instrument payable after date or sight (Section 66)
A promissory note or bill of exchange, made payable at a specified period after date or sight thereof,
must be presented for payment at maturity.
A promissory note payable by instalments must be presented for payment on the 3rd day after the date
fixed for payment of each instalment; and non-payment on such presentment has the same effect as
non-payment of a note at maturity.
Presentment for payment of instrument payable at specified place and not elsewhere (Section 68)
A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque made, drawn or accepted payable at a specified place and
not elsewhere must, in order to charge any party thereto, be presented for payment at that place.
A promissory note or bill of exchange, not made payable as mentioned in sections 68 and 69, must be
presented for payment at the place of business (if any) or at the usual residence, of the maker, drawee
or acceptor thereof, as the case may be.
Presentment when maker, etc., has no known place of business or residence (Section 71)
Presentment for acceptance or payment may be made to the duly authorised agent of the drawee, maker
or acceptor, as the case may be, or, where the drawee, maker or acceptor has died, to his legal
representative, or, where he has been declared an insolvent, to his assignee.
Delay in presentment for acceptance or payment is excused if the delay is caused by circumstances
beyond the control of the holder, and not imputable to his default, misconduct or negligence. When the
cause of the delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made within a reasonable time.
No presentment for payment is necessary, and the instrument is dishonoured at the due date for
presentment, in any of the following cases:
(a) (i) If the maker, drawee or acceptor intentionally prevents the presentment of the instrument, or
(ii) if the instrument being payable at his place of business, he closes such place on a business day
during the usual business hours, or
(iii) if the instrument being payable at some other specified place, neither he nor any person
authorised to pay it attends at such place during the usual business hours, or
(iv) if the instrument not being payable at any specified place, he cannot after due search be found;
(b) as against any party sought to be charged therewith, if he has engaged to pay notwithstanding non-
presentment;
(c) as against any party if, after maturity, with knowledge that the instrument has not been
presented—
(d) as against the drawer, if the drawer could not suffer damage from the want of such presentment.
9. RULES OF COMPENSATION
Rules as to compensation (Section 117)
The compensation payable in case of dishonour of promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque, by any
party liable to the holder or any endorsee, shall be determined by the following rules:
(a) the holder is entitled to the amount due upon the instrument, together with the expenses properly
incurred in presenting, noting and protesting it;
(b) when the person charged resides at a place different from that at which the instrument was
payable, the holder is entitled to receive such sum at the current rate of exchange between the two
places;
(c) an indorser who, being liable, has paid the amount due on the same is entitled to the amount so paid
with interest at 18% per annum from the date of payment until tender or realisation thereof, together
with all expenses caused by the dishonour and payment;
(d) the party entitled to compensation may draw a bill upon the party liable to compensate him,
payable at sight or on demand, for the amount due to him, together with all expenses properly incurred
by him.