Must Do Questions FR May' 25 - CA Final
Must Do Questions FR May' 25 - CA Final
CA FINAL FR
MUST DO QUESTIONS FOR EXAMS MAY’25
INDEX
TOPIC 1
IND AS 1 – PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Prepare a consolidated balance sheet using current and non-current classification in accordance with Ind AS
1. Assume operating cycle is 12 months
SOLUTION
A Limited
Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 31stMarch 20X1
(₹ In crores)
Particulars Note 31st March, 31st March,
20X1 20X0
ASSETS
Non-current assets
(a) Property, plant and equipment 1 3,590 3,460
(b) Investment property 3,100 3,100
Total non-current assets 6,690 6,560
Current assets
(a) Inventory 2 1,680 1,780
V'Smart Academy Page | 3
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
Working Notes:
Notes Particulars Basis Calculation Amount
₹ crores ₹ crores
1 Property, plant and Property, plant and equipment 5,200 – 1,610 3,590 (3,460)
equipment (PPE) at cost less Accumulated (4,700 – 1,240)
(depreciation on PPE
2 Inventory Inventory at cost add Inventory 1,500 + 180 1,680 (1,780)
at fair value less cost to (1,650 + 130)
complete and sell
3 Trade and other Accounts receivable less 2,300 – 200 2,100 (1,735)
receivables Provision for doubtful (1,800 – 65)
receivables
4 Cash and cash Cash and Cash equivalents 250 + 70 320
equivalents (170 + 30) (200)
5 Other Equity Retained earnings at the 1,875 + 1,200– 2,825
beginning of the year add Profit 160 – 90
for the year less Non- (1,740 + 830 –
controlling interest’s share of 150 – 70) (2,350)
profit for the year less Dividend
declared by A Limited
6 Long-term debt Long-term debt 3,300 – 500 2,800
less Due on 1stJanuary each (3,885 – 500) (3,385)
year
7 Trade & other Trade payables 880 + 15 895
payables add Accrued expenses (790 + 30) (820)
TOPIC 2
INDAS 2 – INVENTORIES
QUESTION 3: (SIMILAR TO MTP Oct18 & Dec21 EXAMS)
([Link].109 - Question Bank)
In a manufacturing process of Mars ltd, one by-product BP emerges besides two main products MP1 and MP2
apart from scrap. Details of cost of production process are here under:
Item Unit Amount Output Closing Stock 31-3-20X1
Raw material 14,500 1,50,000 MP I-5,000 units 250
Wages - 90,000 MP II - 4,000 units 100
Fixed overhead - 65,000 BP- 2,000 units -
Variable overhead - 50,000 - -
Average market price of MP1 and MP2 is ₹60 per unit and ₹50 per unit respectively, by- product is sold @ ₹20
per unit. There is a profit of ₹5,000 on sale of by-product after incurring separate processing charges of ₹8,000
and packing charges of ₹2,000, ₹5,000 was realised from sale of scrap.
Required:
Calculate the value of closing stock of MP1 and MP2 as on 31-03-20X1.
SOLUTION
As per Ind 2 ‘Inventories’, most by-products as well as scrap or waste materials, by their nature, are
immaterial. They are often measured at net realizable value and this value is deducted from the cost of the
main product.
2) Calculation of cost of conversion for allocation between joint products MP1 and MP2
Raw material 1,50,000
Wages 90,000
Fixed overhead 65,000
Variable overhead 50,000
Less: NRV of by-product BP (See Calculation 1) 30,000
Sale value of scrap 5,000 (35,000)
Joint cost to be allocated between MP1 and MP2 3,20,000
3) Determination of “basis for allocation” and allocation of joint cost to MP1 and MP2
MP I MP 2
Output in units (a) 5,000 4,000
Sales price per unit (b) 60 50
Sales value (a x b) 3,00,000 2,00,000
Ratio of allocation 3 2
Joint cost of ₹ 3,20,000 allocated in the ratio of 3:2 (c) 1,92,000 1,28,000
Cost per unit [c/a] 38.4 32
Total 2,720
QUESTION 5:
([Link].304 - Question Bank)
Particulars Kg. units ₹
Opening Inventory: Finished Goods 1,000 25,000
Raw Materials 1,100 11,000
Purchases 10,000 1,00,000
Labour 76,500
Overheads (Fixed) 75,000
V'Smart Academy Page | 7
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
The expected production for the year was 15,000 kg of the finished product. Due to fall in market demand
the sales price for the finished goods was ₹ 20 per kg and the replacement cost for the raw material was ₹
9.50 per kg on the closing day. You are required to calculate the closing inventory as on that date.
SOLUTION
Calculation of cost for closing inventory
Particulars ₹
Cost of Purchase (10,200 x 10) 1,02,000
Direct Labour 76,500
Fixed Overhead 75000/15000 x 10200 51,000
Cost of Production 2,29,500
Cost of closing inventory per unit (2,29,500/10,200) ₹ 22.50
Net Realisable Value per unit ₹ 20.00
Since net realisable value is less than cost, closing inventory will be valued at ₹ 20.
As NRV of the finished goods is less than its cost, relevant raw materials will be valued at replacement cost
i.e. ₹ 9.50.
Therefore, value of closing inventory: Finished Goods (1,200x20) ₹ 24,000
Raw Materials (900 x 9.50) ₹ 8,550
₹ 32,550
` `
Description `
Purchase price 30,000
Import duty and other non-refundable purchase taxes 8,000
Freight costs for bringing the goods to the factory storeroom 3,000
TOPIC 3
INDAS 7 - STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
QUESTION 7: (RTP Nov19)
([Link].11 - Question Bank)
Following is the balance sheet of Kuber Limited for the year ended 31 March, 20X2
(Rs. in lacs)
20X2 20X1
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 13,000 12,500
Intangible assets 50 30
Other financial assets 145 170
Deferred Tax Asset (net) 855 750
Other non-current assets 800 770
Total non-current assets 14,850 14,220
Current assets
Financial assets
Investments 2,300 2,500
Cash and cash equivalents 220 460
Other current assets 195 85
Total current assets 2,715 3,045
Total assets 17,565 17,265
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Equity share capital 300 300
Other equity 12,000 8,000
Total equity 12,300 8,300
Liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Long-term borrowings 2,000 5,000
Other non-current liabilities 2,740 3,615
Total non-current liabilities 4,740 8,615
Current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables 150 90
Bank overdraft 75 60
Other current liabilities 300 200
Total current liabilities 525 350
Total liabilities 5,265 8,965
Total equity and liabilities 17,565 17,265
Additional Information:
1) Profit after tax for the year ended March 31, 20X2 - Rs. 4,450 lacs
2) Interim dividend paid during the year - Rs. 450 lacs
3) Depreciation and amortisation charged in the statement of profit and loss during the current year are
as under
a) Property, Plant and Equipment - Rs. 500 lacs
b) Intangible Assets - Rs. 20 lacs
4) During the year ended March 31, 20X2 two machineries were sold for Rs. 70 lacs. The carrying amount
of these machineries as on March 31, 20X2 is Rs. 60 lacs.
5) Income taxes paid during the year Rs. 105 lacs
6) Other non-current / current assets and liabilities are related to operations of Kuber Ltd. and do not
contain any element of financing and investing activities.
Using the above information of Kuber Limited, construct a statement of cash flows under indirect method.
Solution:
Statement of Cash Flows
Rs. in lacs
Cash flows from Operating Activities
Net Profit after Tax 4,450
Add: Tax Paid 105
4,555
Add: Depreciation & Amortisation (500 + 20) 520
Less: Gain on Sale of Machine (70-60) (10)
Less: Increase in Deferred Tax Asset (855-750) (105)
4,960
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Add: Decrease in financial asset (170 - 145) 25
Less: Increase in other non-current asset (800 - 770) (30)
Less: Increase in other current asset (195 - 85) (110)
Less: Decrease in other non-current liabilities (3,615 – 2,740) (875)
Add: Increase in other current liabilities (300 - 200) 100
Add: Increase in trade payables (150-90) 60
4,130
Less: Income Tax (105)
Cash generated from Operating Activities 4,025
Cash flows from Investing Activities
Sale of Machinery 70
Purchase of Machinery [13,000-(12,500 – 500-60)] (1,060)
Purchase of Intangible Asset [50-(30-20)] (40)
Sale of Financial asset - Investment (2,500 – 2,300) 200
Cash outflow from Investing Activities (830)
Cash flows from Financing Activities
Dividend Paid (450)
Long term borrowings paid (5,000 – 2,000) (3,000)
Cash outflow from Financing Activities (3,450)
Net Cash outflow from all the activities (255)
Opening cash and cash equivalents (460 – 60) 400
Closing cash and cash equivalents (220 – 75) 145
QUESTION 8:
(Q.INDAS7. SM12- Question Bank)
The relevant extracts of consolidated financial statements of A Ltd. are provided below:
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended (Rs. in Lac)
31st March 20X2 31st March 20X1
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment 4,750 4,650
Investment in Associate 800 -
Financial Assets 2,150 1,800
Current Assets
Inventories 1,550 1,900
Trade Receivables 1,250 1,800
Cash and Cash Equivalents 4,650 3,550
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Trade Payables 1,550 3,610
Extracts from Consolidated Statement of Profit and Loss for the year ended 31st March 20X2
Particulars Amount (Rs. in Lac)
Revenue 12,380
Cost of Goods Sold (9,860)
Gross Profit 2,520
Other Income 300
Operating Expenses (450)
Other expenses (540)
Interest expenses (110)
Share of Profit of Associate 120
Profit before Tax 1,840
Working Notes:
1) Profit before tax Amount in Rs. Lacs
Reported profit as per Profit or Loss Statement 1,840
Add back: Renovation costs charged as expense 30
Construction costs charged as expense 40
Borrowing costs to be capitalized 10
Revised Profit before tax 1,920
2) Changes in Trade Receivables Amount in Rs. Lacs
Opening Balance 1,800
Add: Receivables of S Ltd. 30
1,830
Less: Closing Balance (1,250)
580
3) Changes in Inventories Amount in Rs. Lacs
Opening Balance 1,900
Add: Receivables of S Ltd. 60
1,960
Less: Closing Balance (1,550)
410
4) Changes in Trade Payables Amount in Rs. Lacs
Opening Balance 3,610
Add: Receivables of S Ltd. 50
3,660
Less: Closing Balance (1,550)
2,110
Working Note:
Computation of Foreign Exchange Gain
Bank Account USD Date USD Exchange Rs.
Rate
Opening balance 1.4.2019 7,000 70.00 4,90,000
Less: Purchase of Computer 30.11.2019 280 71.00 19,880
Closing balance calculated 6,720 4,70,120
Closing balance (at year end spot rate) 31.3.2020 6,720 71.50 4,80,480
Foreign Exchange Gain credited to Profit
and Loss account 10,360
TOPIC - 4
INDAS 8 - ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING
ESTIMATES & ERRORS
QUESTION 10: (RTP May19 & MTP Oct18)
(Q.INDAS8.SM12 - Question Bank)
ABC Ltd. changed its method adopted for inventory valuation in the year 20X2-20X3. Prior to the
change, inventory was valued using the first in first out method (FIFO). However, it was felt that
in order to match current practice and to make the financial statements more relevant and reliable,
a weighted average valuation model would be more appropriate.
The effect of the change in the method of valuation of inventory was as follows:
● 31st March, 20X1 - Increase of Rs. 10 million
● 31st March, 20X2 - Increase of Rs. 15 million
● 31st March, 20X3 - Increase of Rs. 20 million
Profit or loss under the FIFO valuation model are as follows:
20X2-20X3 20X1-20X2
Revenue 324 296
Cost of goods sold (173) (164)
Gross profit 151 132
Expenses (83) (74)
Profit 68 58
Retained earnings at 31st March, 20X1 were Rs. 423 million
Present the change in accounting policy in the profit or loss and produce an extract of the statement of changes
in equity in accordance with Ind AS 8.
Solution:
Profit or loss under weighted average valuation method is as follows:
20X2-20X3 20X1-20X2 (Restated)
Revenue 324 296
Cost of goods sold (168) (159)
Gross profit 159 137
Expenses (83) (74)
Profit 73 63
inventory was reported at cost ₹ 15,000 in the 20X2-20X3 financial statements when its selling price less costs
to complete and sell was estimated at ₹ 18,000. The accounting estimates made in preparing the 31 March
20X3 financial statements were appropriately made using all reliable information that the entity could
reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the preparation and presentation of
those financial statements.
Analyse the above situation in accordance with relevant Ind AS.
Solution
Ind AS 8 is applied in selecting and applying accounting policies, and accounting for changes in accounting
policies, changes in accounting estimates and corrections of prior period errors. A change in accounting
estimate is an adjustment of the carrying amount of an asset or a liability, or the amount of the periodic
consumption of an asset. This change in accounting estimate is an outcome of the assessment of the
present status of, and expected future benefits and obligations associated with, assets and liabilities.
Changes in accounting estimates result from new information or new developments and, accordingly, are
not corrections of errors. Further, the effect of change in an accounting estimate, shall be recognised
prospectively by including it in profit or loss in:
(a) The period of the change, if the change affects that period only; or
(b) The period of the change and future periods, if the change affects both. Prior period errors are omissions
from, and misstatements in, the entity's financial statements for one or more prior periods arising from a
failure to use, or misuse of, reliable information that: (a) was available when financial statements for those
periods were approved for issue; and
(b) Could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the preparation and
presentation of those financial statements.
Such errors include the effects of mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying accounting policies,
oversights or misinterpretations of facts, and fraud. On the basis of above provisions, the given situation
would be dealt as follows: The defect was neither known nor reasonably possible to detect at 31 March
20X3 or before the financial statements were approved for issue, so understatement of the warranty
provision ₹ 1,00,000 and overstatement of inventory ₹ 2,000 (Note 1) in the 31 March 20X3 financial
statements are not a prior period errors. The effects of the latent defect that relate to the entity's financial
position at 31 March 20X3 are changes in accounting estimates. In preparing its financial statements for
31 March 20X3, the entity made the warranty provision and inventory valuation appropriately using all
reliable information that the entity could reasonably be expected to have obtained and had taken into
account the same in the preparation and presentation of those financial statements. Consequently, the
additional costs are expensed in calculating profit or loss for 20X3-20X4.
Working Note:
Inventory is measured at the lower of cost (i.e. ₹ 15,000) and fair value less costs to complete and sell (i.e.
₹ 18,000 originally estimated minus ₹ 5,000 costs to rectify latent defect) = ₹ 13,000.
At 31st March 20X3 as a result of usage of improved lubricants, Y Ltd. Reassessed the useful life of Machine
A from Years. Machine A is depreciated on the straight-line method to a Nil residual value. It was acquired for
` 6,000 on 1st April, 20X0.
SOLUTION:
Extract of Y Ltd.’s Statement of Profit and Loss
for the year ended 31st March, 20X3
20X2- Referen 20X1- Referen
20X3 ce to 20X2 ce to
W.N. Restated W.N.
` `
Revenue 1,04,000 73,500
Cost of sales (20X1-
20X2 previously ` (79,100) 1 (60,000) 4
53,500)
Gross profit 24,900 13,500
Other income — change
in the measurement
policy
i.e. the value of
investment in associate 5,000 2 2,000 5
at FVTPL
Profit before tax 29,900 15,500
Income tax expense (8,970) 3 (4,650) 6
Profit for the year 20,930 10,850
` `
Retained earnings, as
restated, at the
beginning of the year
- effect of a change 12
in accounting 11,900 13 10,500
policy
41,350 30,500
Profit for the year 20,930 10,850
Retained earnings at the
end of the year
62,280 41,350
Y Ltd.
Extract of Notes to the Financial Statements for the year ended 31st March, 20X3
Note X : Change in Accounting Estimates
Due to usage of improved lubricants the estimated useful life of the machine used for production was
increased from four years to seven years. The effect of the change in the useful life of the machine is to
reduce the depreciation allocation by ` 900 in 20X2-20X3 and 20X3-20X4. The after-tax effect is an increase
in profit for the year of ` 630 for each of the two years.
Depreciation expense in 20X4-20X5 to 20X6-20X7 is increased by ` 600 because of revision in the useful
life of machinery, as under the initial estimate, the asset would have been fully depreciated at the end of
20X3-20X4. The after-tax effect for these three years is a decrease in profit for the year by ` 420 per year.
Working Notes:
1. ` 86,500 (given) minus ` 6,500 correction of error (now recognised as an expense in 20X1-20X2)
minus ` 900 (W.N.9) effect of the change in accounting estimate.
2. ` 25,000 fair value (20X2-20X3) minus ` 20,000 fair value (20X1-20X2) = ` 5,000 (the effect of
applying the new accounting policy (fair value model) in 20X2-20X3).
3. ` 5,250 + ` 1,950 (W.N.8) + 30% (` 900 (W.N.9) reduction in depreciation resulting from the change
in accounting estimate) + 30% (` 5,000 increase in the fair value of investment property — change in
accounting policy) = ` 8,970.
4. ` 53,500 as previously stated + ` 6,500 (products sold and incorrectly included in closing inventory
in 20X1-20X2) = ` 60,000 (that is, the prior period error is corrected retrospectively by restating the
comparative amounts).
5. ` 20,000 fair value (20X1-20X2) minus ` 18,000 fair value (20X0-20X1) = ` 2,000 (the effect in 20X1-
20X2 of the change in accounting policy for investments in associates from the cost model to the fair
value model).
6. ` 6,000 as previously stated minus ` 1,950 (W.N.8) correction of prior period error + 30% (` 2,000
change in accounting policy) = ` 4,650.
7. ` 6,500 (products sold and incorrectly included in inventory in 20X1 -20X2) – ` 1,950 (W.N.8) (tax
overstated in 20X1-20X2) = ` 4,550.
8. ` 6,500 (products sold and incorrectly included in inventory in 20X1 -20X2) x 30% (income tax rate)
= ` 1,950.
9. ` 1,500 depreciation (using old estimate, that is, ` 6,000 cost ÷ 4 years) minus ` 600 (W.N.10) (using
new estimate of useful life) = ` 900.
10. ` 3,000 (W.N.11) carrying amount ÷ 5 years remaining useful life = ` 600 depreciation per year.
11. [` 6,000 cost minus (` 1,500 depreciation x 2 years)] = ` 3,000 carrying amount at 31st March,
20X2.
12. (` 18,000 fair value of investment in associates at 31 st March, 20X1 minus ` 3,000 carrying amount
based on the cost model at the same date) x 0.7 (to reflect 30% income tax rate) = ` 10,500 (effect of
a change in accounting policy (from cost model to fair value model)).
13. ` 10,500 (W.N.12) + [` 2,000 (W.N.5) x 0.7 (to reflect 30% income tax rate)] = ` 11,900.
TOPIC - 5
IND AS 10 - EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
QUESTION 13: (Nov19 EXAMS) (Multiple Cases)
([Link].221 – Question Bank)
Discuss with reasons whether these events are in nature of adjusting or non-adjusting and the treatment
needed in light of accounting standard Ind AS 10.
(i) Moon Ltd. won an arbitration award on 25th April, 2019 for Rs. 1 crore. From the arbitration proceeding,
it was evident that the Company is most likely to win the arbitration award. The directors approved the
financial statements for the year ending 31.03.2019 on 1st May, 2019. The management did not consider
the effect of the above transaction in Financial Year 2018-2019, as it was favourable to the Company and
the award came after the end of the financial year.
(ii) Zoom Ltd. has a trading business of Mobile telephones. The Company has purchased 1000 mobiles phones
at Rs 5,000 each on 15th March, 2019. The manufacturers of the phone had announced the release of the
new version on 1stMarch, 2019 but had not announced the price. Zoom Ltd. has valued inventory at cost
of Rs 5,000 each at the year ending 31st March, 2019.
Due to the arrival of a new advanced version of Mobile Phone on 8th April, 2019, the selling prices of
the mobile stocks remaining with the Company were dropped at Rs. 4,000 each.
The financial statements of the company valued mobile phones @ Rs. 5,000 each and not at the value @
Rs 4,000 less expenses on sales, as the price reduction in selling price was affected after 31.03.2019.
(iii) There was an old due from a debtor amounting to Rs. 15 lakh against whom proceedings was instituted
prior to the financial year ending 31st March, 2019. The debtor was declared insolvent on 15th April,
2019.
(iv) Assume that subsequent to the year end and before the financial statements are approved, Company’s
management announces that it will restructure the operation of the company. Management plans to
make significant redundancies and to close a few divisions of the company's business; however, there is
no formal plan yet. Should management recognise a provision in the books, if the company decides
subsequent to the end of the accounting year to restructure its operations?
SOLUTION
As per Ind AS 10, the treatment of stated issues would be as under:
(i) Adjusting event: It is an adjusting event as it is the settlement after the reporting period of a court
case that confirms that the entity had a present obligation at the end of the reporting period. Even
though winning of award is favorable to the company, it should be accounted in its books as receivable
since it is an adjusting event.
(ii) Adjusting event: The sale of inventories after the reporting period may give evidence about their net
realizable value at the end of the reporting period; hence it is an adjusting event as per Ind AS 10.
Zoom Limited should value its inventory at Rs. 40,00,000. Hence, appropriate provision must be made
for Rs. 15 lakh.
(iii) Adjusting event: As per Ind AS 10, the receipt of information after the reporting period indicating that
an asset was impaired at the end of the reporting period, or that the amount of a previously recognised
impairment loss for that asset needs to be adjusted.
The bankruptcy of a customer that occurs after the reporting period usually confirms that the
customer was credit-impaired at the end of the reporting period.
or on the reporting date. Hence, it does not give rise to a constructive obligation at the end of the
reporting period to create a provision.
The effects of the damage to the warehouse are recognised in the year 2019 reporting period. Prior
periods will not be adjusted because those financial statements were prepared in good faith (e.g.
regarding estimate of useful life, assessment of impairment indicators etc.) and had not affected the
financials of prior years.
b) Damage of inventory due to seepage of rainwater Rs. 1,00,000 occurred during the year 2020. It is a
non-adjusting event after the end of the 2019 reporting period since the inventory was in good condition
at 31st December 2019. Hence, no accounting has been done for it in the year 2019.
H Ltd. must disclose the nature of the event (i.e. rain-damage to inventories) and an estimate of the
financial effect (i.e. Rs. 1,00,000 loss) in the notes to its 31st December 2019 annual financial
statements.
iii) If the damage to the warehouse had been caused by an event that occurred after 31st December 2019
and was not due to structural fault, then it would be considered as a non-adjusting event after the end
of the reporting period 2019 as the warehouse would have been in a good condition at 31st December
2019.
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of additional depreciation to be charged in the year 2019
Original depreciation as per SLM already charged during the year 2019
= Rs. 10,00,000/ 30 years = Rs. 33,333.
Carrying value at the end of 2018 = 10,00,000 – (Rs. 33,333 x 3 years)
= Rs. 9,00,000 Revised depreciation = 9,00,000 / 17 years = Rs. 52,941
Additional depreciation to be recognised in the books in the year 2019
= Rs. 52,941 – Rs. 33,333 = Rs. 19,608
TOPIC - 6
INDAS 12 – INCOME TAXES
B) Charge to Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31st March 20X2: Investment in L Ltd.
Particulars Carrying Tax Base Temporary
amount Difference
Opening Balance (1st April 20X1) ₹ 70 Cr ₹ 45 Cr ₹ 25Cr
Closing Balance (31st March 20X2) ₹ 75 Cr ₹ 45 Cr ₹ 30 Cr
Net Change ₹ 5 Cr
Increase in Deferred Tax Liability (20% tax rate) ₹ 1 Cr
Considering the increase in the value of investment arising through Statement of Profit or Loss, the
accounting for the increase in deferred tax liability is made as under:
Tax expense (Profit or Loss Statement) Dr ₹ 1 Cr
To Deferred Tax Liability ₹ 1 Cr
(Being increase in deferred tax liability recognized)
QUESTION 17: (Similar to RTP Nov18 May19, Nov20 EXAMS, MTP May’24)
([Link].205 - Question Bank)
X Ltd. prepares consolidated financial statements to 31st March each year. During the year ended 31st March
2018, the following events affected the tax position of the group:
i) Y Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of X Ltd., made a loss adjusted for tax purposes of ₹ 30,00,000. Y Ltd.
is unable to utilise this loss against previous tax liabilities. Income-tax Act does not allow Y Ltd. to transfer
the tax loss to other group companies. However, it allows Y Ltd. to carry the loss forward and utilise it
against company’s future taxable profits. The directors of X Ltd. do not consider that Y Ltd. will make
taxable profits in the foreseeable future.
ii) Just before 31st March, 2018, X Ltd. committed itself to closing a division after the year end, making a
number of employees redundant. Therefore, X Ltd. recognised a provision for closure costs of ₹ 20,00,000
in its statement of financial position as at 31st March, 2018. Income-tax Act allows tax deductions for
closure costs only when the closure actually takes place. In the year ended 31st March 2019, X Ltd. expects
to make taxable profits which are well in excess of ₹ 20,00,000. On 31st March, 2018, X Ltd. had taxable
temporary differences from other sources which were greater than ₹ 20,00,000.
iii)During the year ended 31st March, 2017, X Ltd. capitalised development costs which satisfied the criteria
in paragraph 57 of Ind AS 38 ‘Intangible Assets’. The total amount capitalised was ₹ 16,00,000. The
development project began to generate economic benefits for X Ltd. from 1st January, 2018. The directors
of X Ltd. estimated that the project would generate economic benefits for five years from that date. The
development expenditure was fully deductible against taxable profits for the year ended 31st March, 2018.
iv) On 1st April, 2017, X Ltd. borrowed ₹ 1,00,00,000. The cost to X Ltd. of arranging the borrowing was ₹
2,00,000 and this cost qualified for a tax deduction on 1st April, 2017. The loan was for a three-year period.
No interest was payable on the loan but the amount repayable on 31st March, 2020 will be ₹ 1,30,43,800.
This equates to an effective annual interest rate of 10%. As per the Income-tax Act, a further tax deduction
of ₹ 30,43,800 will be claimable when the loan is repaid on 31st March, 2020.
Explain and show how each of these events would affect the deferred tax assets / liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet of X Ltd. group at 31st March, 2018 as per Ind AS. Assume the rate of corporate
income tax is 20%.
SOLUTION:
i) The tax loss creates a potential deferred tax asset for the group since its carrying value is nil and its tax
base is ₹ 30,00,000.
However, no deferred tax asset can be recognised because there is no prospect of being able to reduce
tax liabilities in the foreseeable future as no taxable profits are anticipated.
ii) The provision creates a potential deferred tax asset for the group since it’s carrying value is ₹ 20,00,000
and its tax base is nil.
This deferred tax asset can be recognised because X Ltd. is expected to generate taxable profits in excess
of ₹ 20,00,000 in the year to 31st March, 2019.
The amount of the deferred tax asset will be ₹ 4,00,000 (₹ 20,00,000 x 20%).
This asset will be presented as a deduction from the deferred tax liabilities caused by the (larger) taxable
temporary differences.
iii)The development costs have a carrying value of ₹ 15,20,000 (₹ 16,00,000 – (₹ 16,00,000 x 1/5 x 3/12)).
The tax base of the development costs is nil since the relevant tax deduction has already been claimed.
The deferred tax liability will be ₹ 3,04,000 (₹ 15,20,000 x 20%). All deferred tax liabilities are shown
as non-current.
iv) The carrying value of the loan at 31st March, 2018 is ₹ 1,07,80,000 (₹ 1,00,00,000 – ₹ 2,00,000 + (₹
98,00,000 x 10%)).
The tax base of the loan is ₹ 1,00,00,000.
This creates a deductible temporary difference of ₹ 7,80,000 (₹ 1,07,80,000 – ₹ 1,00,00,000) and a
potential deferred tax asset of ₹ 1,56,000 (₹ 7,80,000 x 20%). Due to the availability of taxable profits
next year (see part (ii) above), this asset can be recognised as a deduction from deferred tax liabilities.
SOLUTION:
a) Because the unrealised gain on revaluation of the equity investment is not taxable until sold, there are
no current tax consequences. The tax base of the investment is ₹ 2,00,000. The revaluation creates a
taxable temporary difference of ₹ 40,000 (₹ 2,40,000 – ₹ 2,00,000).
This creates a deferred tax liability of ₹ 10,000 (₹ 40,000 x 25%). The liability would be non-current.
The fact that there is no intention to dispose of the investment does not affect the accounting treatment.
Because the unrealised gain is reported in other comprehensive income, the related deferred tax expense
is also reported in other comprehensive income.
b) When K Ltd sold the products to A Ltd, K Ltd would have generated a taxable profit of ₹ 16,000 (₹
80,000 – ₹ 64,000). This would have created a current tax liability for K Ltd and the group of ₹ 4,000 (₹
16,000 x 25%). This liability would be shown as a current liability and charged as an expense in arriving
at profit or loss for the period. In the consolidated financial statements the carrying value of the unsold
inventory would be ₹ 38,400 (₹ 64,000 x 60%). The tax base of the unsold inventory would be ₹ 48,000
(₹ 80,000 x 60%). In the consolidated financial statements there would be a deductible temporary
difference of ₹ 9,600 (₹ 38,400 – ₹ 48,000) and a potential deferred tax asset of ₹ 2,400 (₹ 9,600 x 25%).
This would be recognised as a deferred tax asset since A Ltd is expected to generate sufficient taxable
profits against which to utilise the deductible temporary difference. The resulting credit would reduce
consolidated deferred tax expense in arriving at profit or loss.
c) The receipt of revenue in advance on 1st October 20X1 would create a current tax liability of ₹ 50,000
(₹ 200,000 x 25%) as at 31st March 20X2. The carrying value of the revenue received in advance at
31st March 20X2 is ₹ 80,000 (₹ 200,000 – ₹ 120,000). Its tax base is nil. The deductible temporary
difference of ₹ 80,000 would create a deferred tax asset of ₹ 20,000 (₹ 80,000 x 25%). The asset can be
recognised because K Ltd has sufficient taxable profits against which to utilise the deductible temporary
difference.
You are required to calculate the deferred tax arising on acquisition of Entity S. Also calculate the Goodwill
arising on acquisition.
SOLUTION
Calculation of Net assets acquired (excluding the effect of deferred tax liability):
Net assets acquired Tax base Fair values
Rs.’000 Rs.’000
Land and buildings 500 700
Property, plant and equipment 200 270
Inventory 100 80
Accounts receivable 150 150
Cash and cash equivalents 130 130
Total assets 1,080 1,330
Accounts payable (160) (160)
Retirement benefit obligations - (100)
Net assets before deferred tax liability 920 1,070
Note: Since, the tax base of the goodwill is nil, taxable temporary difference of Rs. 4,90,000 arises on
goodwill. However, no deferred tax is recognised on the goodwill. The deferred tax on other temporary
differences arising on acquisition is provided at 40% and not 30%, because taxes will be payable or
recoverable in entity S’s tax jurisdictions when the temporary differences will be reversed.
Additional information:
● Corporate income tax rate applicable to EARTH Limited is 30%.
● Other income includes long-term capital gains of Rs. 10 crore which are taxable at the rate of 10%.
● Other expenses include the following items which are not deductible for income tax purposes:
Item Rs. in Crore
Penalties 1.00
Impairment of goodwill 44.00
Corporate Social Responsibility expense 6.00
● Other expenses include research and development (R & D) expenditure of Rs. 8 crore in respect of which
a 200% weighted deduction is available under income tax laws.
● Other income includes dividends of Rs. 4 crore, which is exempt from tax.
● Profit before tax of Rs. 594 crore includes (i) agriculture income of Rs. 55 crore which is exempt from tax;
and (ii) profit of Rs. 60 crore earned in the USA on which EARTH Limited is required to pay tax at the rate
of 20%.
● Depreciation as per income tax laws is Rs. 25.0 crore.
During review of the financial statements of EARTH Limited, the CFO multiplied profit before tax by the income
tax rate and arrived at Rs. 178.2 crore as the tax expense (Rs. 594 crore x 30% = Rs. 178.2 crore). However,
actual income tax expense appearing in the summarized statement of profit and loss is Rs. 166.9 crore.
The CFO has sought your help in reconciling the difference between the two tax expense amounts. Prepare
a reconciliation containing the disclosure as required under the relevant Ind AS.
SOLUTION
Reconciliation of Tax on Accounting Profit and Tax Expense as per P&L
Particulars Amount
Tax on A/c Profit @ 30% 594 × 30% 178.20
Less: 10 × 20% (2)
Long Term Capital Gain × Difference in Tax
Rate
R&D additional 100 % deduction (16- 8) x 30% (2.4)
Dividend exempt 4 x 30% (1.2)
Agriculture Income Exempt 55 x 30% (16.5)
Profit From USA 60 x 10 % (6)
Taxable at 20%
Disallowed permanently
Penalty/Goodwill/CSR
51 x 30% 15.30
Current Tax 165.40
DTL in relation to depreciation (30-25) x 30% 1.50
Tax Expense 166.90
Rates Reconciliation:
Particulars Amount
Effective Tax Rate 166 .90/594 x 100 28.10%
Differences due to:
(+) Long Term Capital Gain 2/594 x 100 0.34%
(+) R&D Expenses 2.4/594 x 100 0.404%
(+) Dividend Exempt 1.2/594 x 100 0.202%
(+) Agriculture Income 16.5/594 x 100 2.78%
(+) Profit from USA 6/594 x 100 1.01%
(-) Permanent Deductions 15.3/594 x 100 (2.58%)
(-) DTL 1.5/594 x 100 (0.256%)
Applicable Tax Rate 30%
QUESTION 21
([Link].220A - Question Bank)
H Ltd. is a manufacturing company, wanting to calculate its taxable profit or loss for the year
ended 31 March 20X8. The statement of profit and loss and other comprehensive income, the
balance sheet and the notes are given below.
Tax rate for the financial year 20X7-20X8 is 30%, but the new tax rate of 32%, for the year 20X8-20X9 and
beyond, has already been enacted before the year end.
Calculate taxable profit for the financial year 20X7-20X8 and the related current tax expense.
Balance Sheet as of 31 March 20X8
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 4,20,00,000
Product development costs 21,00,000
Investment in subsidiary – S Ltd. 1,54,00,000
Current assets
Trading investments 72,80,000
Trade receivables 2,19,10,000
Inventories 1,06,40,000
Cash and cash equivalents 63,00,000
TOTAL ASSETS 10,56,30,000
EQUITY & LIABILITIES
Equity
Share capital 4,20,00,000
Accumulated profits 2,86,24,330
Revaluation surplus 30,80,000
Non-current liabilities
Deferred income - government grants 14,00,000
Liability for product warranty costs 5,60,000
Deferred tax liability (from 20X6-20X7) 7,75,670
Current liabilities
Trade payables 2,67,40,000
Medical benefits for employees 24,50,000
TOTAL EQUITY & LIABILITIES 10,56,30,000
Extract of Statement of profit and loss for the year ended 31 March 20X8
Revenue 16,81,40,000
Cost of sales (13,44,00,000)
Gross profit 3,37,40,000
Operating costs (2,68,80,000)
Profit from operations 68,60,000
Finance costs (9,10,000)
Profit before taxation 59,50,000
Notes:
1. Depreciation expense for the year financial year 20X7-20X8 allowable as per the Income Tax Rules is
72,10,000. Depreciation as allowed for the purposes of financial reporting included in operating costs is
59,50,000. Cost of PPE is 5,60,00,000 and H Ltd. deducted expenses of 1,45,60,000 in its tax returns
prior to financial year 20X7-20X8. Further, as of 31 March 20X8, H Ltd. for the first time revalued its
property, plant and equipment to market value of 4,20,00,000 (revaluation surplus = 30,80,000).
2. In 20X4-20X5, H Ltd. incurred product development costs of 35,00,000. These costs were recognized
as an asset and amortized over period of 10 years. For tax purposes, H Ltd. deducted full product
development costs when they were in 20X4-20X5.
3. Trading investments were acquired in the preceding year at a cost of 80,50,000. These investments
are classified as at fair value through profit or loss and thus recognized in their fair value. Fair value
adjustments are not allowable by the tax authorities.
4. Bad debt provision amounts to 45,50,000 and relates to 2 debtors: debtor A – 28,00,000 (receivable
originates in 20X5-20X6 and 100% provision was recognized in the preceding year) and debtor B –
17,50,000 (receivable originates in 20X6-20X7 and 100% provision was recognized in F.Y. 20X7-20X8).
Tax law allows deduction of 20% of provision for debtors overdue for more than 1 year, another 30% for
debtors overdue for more than 2 years and remaining 50% for debtors overdue for more than 3 years.
5. H Ltd. created a provision for inventory obsolescence in accordance with Ind AS 2 requirements. New
provision created in 20X7-20X8 was 3,78,000 (total provision: 6,30,000). Being a general provision,
this provision is not tax deductible.
6. Government grants are not taxable. Full government grant received in 20X7-20X8 is included in the
balance sheet.
7. In 20X7-20X8, H Ltd. increased a liability for product warranty costs by 1,75,000. Product warranty
costs are not tax deductible until the company pays claims. Claims paid in 20X7-20X8 amounted to
2,17,000.
8. During the year, H Ltd. introduced health care benefits for employees. The expenses are allowable for
tax purposes only when benefits are paid but in line with Ind AS 19, recognized in profit or loss when
employees provide service.
9. Penalties towards violation of laws included in operating expenses amount to 63,000. These are not
deductible for tax purposes.
10. Tax law allows to deduct expenses for petrol only up to 1,40,000 per vehicle per year. H Ltd. had 4
vehicles in 20X7-20X8 and its total petrol expenses amounted to 7,21,000.
Note: This illustration is prepared for the purposes of understanding the computation of current tax and is in
no way based on the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For the purposes of Financial Reporting, the tax
treatments will be given in the question.
Solution:
Calculation of current tax expense
Accounting profit (A) 59,50,000
Add back:
Accounting depreciation 59,50,000
Amortization of product development costs (W.N.1) 3,50,000
Journal Entry
Profit or loss - Current income tax expense Dr. 28,14,000
To Credit Current income tax liabilities 28,14,000
Working Notes:
1. Product development costs:
Annual amortization ( 35,00,000/ 10) 3,50,000
2. Bad debt provisions:
3. Petrol expenses
Actual expenses 7,21,000
Excess 1,61,000
QUESTION 22
([Link].220B - Question Bank)
Based on the balance sheet and notes of H Ltd. from previous example, calculate tax base of its assets and
liabilities as of 31 March 20X8. Note that balance sheet has been adjusted by current tax expense and liability.
Balance Sheet as of 31 March 20X8
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 4,20,00,000
Solution:
Determination of Tax Base
Item Carrying amount Tax base
Property, plant and equipment 420,00,000 342,30,000
Product development costs 21,00,000 0
Investment in subsidiary 154,00,000 154,00,000
Trading investments 72,80,000 80,50,000
Trade receivables 219,10,000 247,10,000
Inventories 106,40,000 112,70,000
Cash and cash equivalents 63,00,000 63,00,000
Deferred income - government grants -14,00,000 0
Liability for product warranty costs -5,60,000 0
Trade payables -267,40,000 -267,40,000
Health care benefits for employees -24,50,000 0
Working Notes:
1. Property, plant and equipment
Cost 560,00,000
Less: current tax depreciation (72,10,000)
I Calculation of cost
Carrying amount 219,10,000
QUESTION 23
([Link].220C - Question Bank)
Based on the data from above illustration 1A of H Ltd., calculate temporary differences and deferred tax. Note
from Illustration 1A: Tax rate for 20X7-20X8 is 30%, but the new tax rate of 32% for the year 20X8-20X9 and
beyond has already been enacted before the year end.
Solution:
Calculation of Temporary Differences / Deferred Tax
Answers
Paragraphs 51 and 51A of Ind AS 12, state that the measurement of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax
assets shall reflect the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the entity expects, at
the end of the reporting period, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.
In some jurisdictions, the manner in which an entity recovers (settles) the carrying amount of an asset
(liability) may affect either or both of:
(a) the tax rate applicable when the entity recovers (settles) the carrying amount of the asset (liability);
and
(b) the tax base of the asset (liability).
In such cases, an entity measures deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets using the tax rate and the
tax base that are consistent with the expected manner of recovery or settlement.
The expectation of the entity at the end of the reporting period with regard to the manner of recovery or
settlement of its assets and liabilities will require exercise of judgement based on evaluation of facts and
circumstances in each case. It may be relevant to consider that there is substance to management’s
expectation of the entity being able to recover the asset through slump sale or otherwise.
Depending on the facts and circumstances, it is generally assumed that the Company will act in the most
economically advantageous way.
If a non-depreciable asset is measured using the revaluation model, then an entity is required to measure
the DTA / DTL considering the tax consequences of recovering the carrying amount through sale.
Accordingly, based on assumption around supporting facts and circumstances to support management
expectation around recovery or settlement, following will be the tax base for computing the deferred tax
assets/ liability, in the given case:
(i) X Ltd. intends to sell it as slump sale eventually after using it for business purpose
If it is concluded based on evaluation of facts that the freehold land will be sold through slump sale,
then the tax base of the land will be the same as the carrying amount of the land, as indexation benefit
is not available in case of slump sale and hence there will not be any temporary difference.
(ii) X Ltd. intends to sell the land individually and not on a slump sale basis
In the given scenario, the company intends to sell the land individually and not on a slump sale such
that the company would get indexation benefit.
Thus, book base of land, i.e. carrying amount of freehold land in the balance sheet is Rs. 10,00,000.
As per paragraph 51A of Ind AS 12, the tax base (amount that will be deductible for tax purposes
against any taxable economic benefits that will flow to the entity when it recovers the carrying amount
of the asset) is the indexed valued of Rs. 15,00,000 since the company intends to sell the land
individually and not on slump sale and thus get indexation benefit. Deferred tax assets will be set up,
subject to recoverability, on a deductible tax difference of Rs. 5,00,000.
(iii) X Ltd. has classified such land as investment property and intends to sell it individually and
not on a slump sale
Paragraph 56 of Ind AS 40, Investment property, requires that after initial recognition, an entity shall
measure all of its investment properties in accordance with the requirement for cost model as per Ind
AS 16, other than those that meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale in accordance with Ind
AS 105, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. Ind AS 40 does not allow fair
value model. Accordingly, freehold land classified as investment property will be measured at cost.
Thus, book base of land, i.e. carrying amount of freehold land in the balance sheet is Rs. 10,00,000.
The Company intends to sell the land individually and not on a slump sale and thus get indexation
benefit. Hence, as per paragraph 51A of Ind AS 12, the tax base (amount that will be deductible for
tax purposes against any taxable economic benefits that will flow to the entity when it recovers the
carrying amount of the asset) is the indexed valued of Rs. 15,00,000. Accordingly, deferred tax assets
will be set up, subject to recoverability, on deductible tax difference of Rs. 5,00,000.
(iv) X Ltd. follows a revaluation model for freehold land and intends to sell it individually and not on a
slump sale. If X Ltd. follows a revaluation model, carrying amount of freehold land in the balance sheet
TOPIC - 7
INDAS 16 – PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
QUESTION 25: (MTP Nov23)
([Link].104 – Question Bank)
MS Ltd. has acquired a heavy machinery at a cost of Rs. 1,00,00,000 (with no breakdown of the component
parts). The estimated useful life is 10 years. At the end of the sixth year, one of the major components, the
turbine requires replacement, as further maintenance is uneconomical. The remainder of the machine is perfect
and is expected to last for the next four years. The cost of a new turbine is Rs. 45,00,000. Appropriate Discount
Rate is 5% pa
Can the cost of the new turbine be recognised as an asset, and, if so, what treatment should be used?
SOLUTION:
The new turbine will produce economic benefits to MS Ltd., and the cost is measurable. Hence, the item
should be recognised as an asset. The original invoice for the machine did not specify the cost of the
turbine; however, the cost of the replacement Rs. 45,00,000 can be used as an indication (usually by
discounting) of the likely cost, six years previously.
If an appropriate discount rate is 5% per annum, Rs. 45,00,000 discounted back six years amounts to Rs.
33,57,900 [Rs. 45,00,000/(1.05)6], i.e., the approximate cost of turbine before 6 years.
The current carrying amount of the turbine which is required to be replaced of Rs. 13,43,160 would be
derecognised from the books of account, (i.e., Original Cost Rs. 33,57,900 as reduced by accumulated
depreciation for past 6 years Rs. 20,14,740, assuming depreciation is charged on straight-line basis.)
The cost of the new turbine, Rs. 45,00,000 would be added to the cost of machine, resulting in a revision
of carrying amount of machine to Rs. 71,56,840. (i.e., Rs. 40,00,000* – Rs. 13,43,160 + Rs. 45,00,000).
*Original cost of machine Rs. 1,00,00,000 reduced by accumulated depreciation (till the end of 6 years) Rs.
60,00,000.
The construction of the factory was partly financed by a loan of Rs. 17500 taken out on 1 April 20X1. The loan
was at an annual rate of interest of 6%. During the period 1 April 20X1 to 31 August 20X1 (when the loan
proceeds had been fully utilised to finance the construction), Sun Ltd received investment income of Rs 100 on
the temporary investment of the proceeds.
Required:
Compute the carrying amount of the factory in the Balance Sheet of Sun Ltd at 31 March 20X2. You should
explain your treatment of all the amounts referred to in this part in your answer.
SOLUTION:
Computation of the cost of the factory
Description Included in Explanation
P.P.E.
Purchase of land 10,000 Both the purchase of the land and the associated legal costs
are direct costs of constructing the factory.
Preparation and leveling 300 A direct cost of constructing the factory
Materials 6,080 A direct cost of constructing the factory
Employment costs of 1,400 A direct cost of constructing the factory for a seven-month
construction workers period
Direct overhead costs 700 A direct cost of constructing the factory for a seven-month
period
Allocated overhead costs Nil Not a direct cost of construction
Income from use as a car Nil Not essential to the construction so recognised directly in
park profit or loss
Relocation costs Nil Not a direct cost of construction
Opening ceremony Nil Not a direct cost of construction
Finance costs 612.50 Capitalise the interest cost incurred in as even month period
(purchase of land would not trigger off capitalisation since land
is not a qualifying asset and it is separate from building.
Construction started from 1st May)
Investment income on (100) offset against the amount capitalized
temporary investment of
the loan proceeds
Demolition cost 920 Where an obligation must recognise as part of the initial cost
recognised as a provision at PV.
Total cost of Land & 19,912.50
Building
Computation of accumulated depreciation
Total depreciable amount 9,912.50 All of the net finance cost of 512.50 (612.50 – 100) has been
allocated to the depreciable amount. Also acceptable to reduce
by allocating a portion to the non- depreciable land element
principle
Depreciation must be in
two parts: Depreciation 49.56 9,912.50x 30% x 1/20 x 4/12
of roof component 57.82 9,912.50x 70% x 1/40 x 4/12
Depreciation of
remainder
Total depreciation 107.38
Computation of 19,805.12 19,912.50 – 107.38
carrying amount
Details Amount
Rs.’000
Costs of the basic materials (list price Rs.12.5 million less a 20% trade discount) 10,000
Recoverable goods and services taxes incurred not included in the purchase cost 1,000
Employment costs of the construction staff for the three months (April to June) 1,200
Other overheads directly related to the construction 900
Payments to external advisors relating to the construction 500
Expected dismantling and restoration costs 2,000
Additional Information
The construction staff was engaged in the production line, which took two months to make ready for use and
was brought into use on 31 May 20X1.
The other overheads were incurred in the two months period ended on 31 May 20X1. They included an
abnormal cost of Rs. 3,00,000 caused by a major electrical fault.
The production line is expected to have a useful economic life of eight years. At the end of that time Flywing
Airways Ltd was legally required to dismantle the plant in a specified manner and restore its location to an
acceptable standard. The amount of Rs.2 million mentioned above is the amount that is expected to be incurred
at the end of the useful life of the production line. The appropriate rate to use in any discounting calculations
is 5%. The present value of Re.1 payable in eight years at a discount rate of 5% is approximately Re.0·68.
Four years after being brought into use, the production line will require a major overhaul to ensure that it
generates economic benefits for the second half of its useful life. The estimated cost of the overhaul, at current
prices, is Rs.3 million.
The Company computes its depreciation charge on a monthly basis. No impairment of the plant had occurred
by 31 March 20X2.
Analyze the accounting implications of costs related to production line to be recognized in the balance sheet
and profit and loss for the year ended 31 March, 20X2.
SOLUTION
Statement showing Cost of production line:
Particulars Amount Rs.’000
Purchase cost 10,000
Goods and services tax – recoverable goods and services tax not included -
Employment costs during the period of getting the production line ready 800
for use (1,200 x 2 months / 3 months)
Other overheads – abnormal costs 600
Payment to external advisors – directly attributable cost 500
Dismantling costs – recognized at present value where an obligation 1,360
exists (2,000 x 0.68)
Total 13,260
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of depreciation charge
Particulars Amount Rs. ’000
In accordance with Ind AS 16 the asset is split into two depreciable
components: Out of the total capitalization amount of 13,260,
Depreciation for 3,000 with a useful economic life (UEL) of four years (3,000 x
¼ x 10/12). 625
This is related to a major overhaul to ensure that it generates economic benefits
for the second half of its useful life
For balance amount, depreciation for 10,260 with an useful economic life of 1,069
eight years will be : 10,260 x 1/8 x 10/12
Total (To Statement of Profit & Loss for the year ended 31stMarch 20X2) 1,694
2. Finance costs
Particulars Amount Rs. ’000
Unwinding of discount (Statement of Profit and Loss – 57
finance cost) 1,360 x 5% x 10/12
QUESTION 28:
([Link].203 - Question Bank)
H Limited purchased an item of PPE costing Rs. 100 million which has useful life of 10 years.
The entity has a contractual decommissioning and site restoration obligation, estimated at Rs.
5 million to be incurred at the end of 10th year. The current market based discount rate is 8%.
The company follows SLM method of depreciation. H Limited follows the Cost Model for accounting of PPE.
Determine the carrying value of an item of PPE and decommissioning liability at each year end when
(a) There is no change in the expected decommissioning expenses, expected timing of incurring the
decommissioning expense and / or the discount rate
(b) At the end of Year 4, the entity expects that the estimated cash outflow on account of decommissioning
and site restoration to be incurred at the end of the useful life of the asset will be Rs. 8 million (in place
of Rs. 5 million, estimated in the past).
Determine in case (b), how H Limited need to account for the changes in the decommissioning liability?
SOLUTION
The present value of such decommissioning and site restoration obligation at the end of 10th year is Rs.
2.32 million [being 5 / (1.08)10]. H Limited will recognise the present value of decommissioning liability of
Rs. 2.32 million as an addition to cost of PPE and will also recognize a corresponding decommissioning
liability. Further, the entity will recognise the unwinding of discount as finance charge.
(a) The following table shows the relevant computations, if there is no change in the expected
decommissioning expenses, expected timing of incurring the decommissioning expense and / or the
discount rate:
TOPIC - 8
INDAS 19 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Amount of Rs. 6,00,000 will be charged to Profit and Loss Account of the company every year as cost for
Defined Benefit Obligation.
Calculation of Current Service Cost
Yr Equal apportioned amount of Discounting @ 8% Current service cost
DBO [i.e. Rs. 30,00,000/5 PV factor (Present Value)
years]
A B C d=bxc
1 6,00,000 0.735 (4 Years) 4,41,000
2 6,00,000 0.794 (3 Years) 4,76,400
3 6,00,000 0.857 (2 Years) 5,14,200
4 6,00,000 0.926 (1 Year) 5,55,600
5 6,00,000 1 (0 Year) 6,00,000
Note: Above working seems incorrect, the increment of 10% should be considered from 2 nd Year onwards
till 5th Year i.e. 4 Times and therefore the Amount of Final Salary should be Rs. 21,81,816/-. Accordingly
entire working will be changed.
QUESTION 32
([Link].204 - Question Bank)
The fair value of plan assets of Anupam Ltd. was Rs. 2,00,000 in respect of employee benefit pension plan
as on 1st April, 2009. On 1st April, 2009 the plan paid out benefit of Rs. 25,000 and received inward
contributions of 55,000.
On 31st March, 2010 the fair value of plan assets was Rs. 2,40,560.
On 1st April, 2009 the company made the following estimates, based on its market studies and prevailing
prices:
Interest and dividend income (after tax) payable by fund 10.00 %
Realised gains on plan assets (after tax) 3.00 %
Fund administrative costs (2.00) %
Expected rate of return 11.00 %
Calculate the expected and actual returns on plan assets as on 31st March, 2010, as per INDAS- 19.
SOLUTION
PLAN ASSET A/C
Date Particulars Amount Date Particulars Amount
1/01 To Opening Balance 200000 01/04 By Benefits Paid 25000
01/04 To Bank (Contr.) 55000 31/03 By Actuarial Loss (b/f) 14740
31/03 To Expected Return 25300 By Closing Balance
31/12 (Fair Value) 240560
280300 280300
Actuarial loss of 14740 will be transfer to OCI
QUESTION 33:
([Link].205 - Question Bank (Old Syllabus)
On 1.1.2008, the fair value of plan assets is Rs.10,000. On 30.6.2008 it paid benefits of Rs.
1,500 and received contributions of Rs. 4,500. On 31.12.2008 fair value of plan assets is
Rs.15,000 and PV of obligation was Rs. 14,972. Actuarial losses on obligation were Rs. 60 on
31.12.2008.
Find the net actuarial gain/losses on 31.12.2008 based on the following estimates:
Interest and dividend income 9.25%
Realised and unrealized gain on plan assets 2.00%
Administration costs 1.00%
(Answer: Act. Gain on PA – 825/-; Net Act Gain – 825 – 60 = 765)
SOLUTION
[Link]. 1 – Calculation of Six Monthly Rate:
{[Square Root of (1 + 0.1025)] – 1 } x 100 = 5%
PLAN ASSET A/C
Date Particulars Amount Date Particulars Amount
1/01 To Opening Balance 10000 30/06 By Benefits Paid 1500
30/06 To Expected Return 500
30/06 To Bank (Contr.) 4500
31/12 To Exp. Return 675 31/12 By Closing Balance 15000
31/12 To Actuarial Gain (b/f) 825 (Fair Value)
16500 16500
Net Actuarial Gain = 825 – 60 = 765 will be transfer to OCI
QUESTION 34: (SIMILAR TO May22 EXAM & MTP Oct20 & RTP May20)
([Link].306 - - Question Bank)
On 1 April 20X1, the fair value of the assets of XYZ Ltd’s defined benefit plan were valued at ₹ 20,40,000 and
the present value of the defined obligation was ₹ 21,25,000. On 31st March,20X2 the plan received
contributions from XYZ Ltd amounting to ₹ 4,25,000 and paid out benefits of ₹ 2,55,000. The current service
cost for the financial year ending 31 March 20X2 is ₹ 5,10,000. An interest rate of 5% is to be applied to the
plan assets and obligations. The fair value of the plans assets at 31 March 20X2 was ₹ 23,80,000, and the
present value of the defined benefit obligation was ₹ 27,20,000. Provide a reconciliation from the opening
balance to the closing balance for Plan assets and Defined benefit obligation. Also show how much amount
should be recognised in the statement of profit and loss, other comprehensive income and balance sheet?
SOLUTION:
Reconciliation of Plan assets and Defined benefit obligation
Particulars Plan Assets Defined benefit
(₹) obligation (₹)
Fair value/present value as at 1st April 20X1 20,40,000 21,25,000
Interest @ 5% 1,02,000 1,06,250
Current service cost 5,10,000
Contributions received 4,25,000 -
Benefits paid (2,55,000) (2,55,000)
Return on gain (assets) (balancing figure) 68,000 -
Actuarial Loss (balancing figure) - 2,33,750
Closing balance as at March 31,20X2 23,80,000 27,20,000
QUESTION 35:
([Link].507 – Question Bank)
Acer Ltd. has 350 employees (same as a year ago). The average staff attrition rates observed
during past 10 years represents 6% per annum. Acer Ltd. provides the following benefits to all
its employees:
Paid vacation - 10 days per year regardless of date of hiring. Compensation for paid vacation
is 100% of employee's salary and unused vacation can be carried forward for 1 year. As of 31st March,
20X1, unused vacation carried forward was 3 days per employee, average salary was ₹ 15,000 per day
and accrued expense for unused vacation in 20X0-20X1 was ₹ 65,00,000. During 20X1-20X2, employees
took 9 days of vacation in average. Salary increase in 20X1-20X2 was 10%.
How would Acer Ltd. recognize liabilities and expenses for these benefits as of 31st March, 20X2? Pass the
journal entry to show the accounting treatment.
SOLUTION
Paid Vacation:
Step 1: Calculation of Unused Vacation in man-days as on 31st March, 20X2:
A. No. of Employees in service for the whole year (94%):
Particulars Man-days
Unused vacation as on 31st March, 20X1 3 days per employee
Entitlement to vacation for 20X1-20X2 10 days per employee
Average vacation availed in 20X1-20X2 (9) days per employee
Unused vacation as on 31st March, 20X2 4 days per employee
(being unused leaves of 20X1-20X2 on FIFO basis)
Total Unused vacation as on 31st March, 20X2 - (A) 1,316 man-days
(350 employees x 94% x 4 days per employee)
B. Newcomers (6%)
Particulars Man-days
Entitlement to vacation for 20X1-20X2 10 days per employee
Average vacation availed in 20X1-20X2 (9) days per employee
Unused vacation as on 31st March, 20X2 1 days per employee
(being unused leaves of 20X1-20X2 on FIFO basis)
Total Unused vacation as on 31st March, 20X2 - (A) 21 man-days
(350 employees x 94% x 4 days per employee)
Total unused vacation as on 31st March, 20X2 (A+ B) 1,337 man-days
2,20,60,500
Provision for unused paid vacation 20X0-20X1 65,00,000
On 31 st March 2024, Tuna Ltd. will report a net pension liability in the balance sheet. The amount of the
liability will be ` 58,140 (` 3,26,480 – ` 2,68,340).
For the year ended 31 st March 2024, Tuna Ltd. will report the current service cost as an operating cost in
the statement of profit or loss. The amount reported will be ` 29,760. The same treatment applies to the past
service cost of ` 7,280.
For the year ended 31 st March 2024, Tuna Ltd. will report a finance cost in profit or loss at the start of the
year of ` 38,750 (` 2,88,420 - ` 2,49,670).
The amount of the finance cost will be ` 3,100 (` 38,750 x 8%). The redundancy programme represents the
partial settlement of the curtailment of a defined benefit obligation. The gain on settlement of ` 2,120 (`
38,390 – ` 36,270) will be reported in the statement of profit and loss.
Other movements in the net pension liability will be reported as remeasurement gains or losses in other
comprehensive income.
For the year ended 31 st March, 2024, the remeasurement loss will be ` 15,020 (Refer above table).
In the Statement of Profit and loss, the following will be recognised:
`
Current service cost 29,760
Net interest on net defined liability (` 23,074 – ` 19,974) 3,100
Gain on settlement (` 38,390 – ` 36,270) 2,120
TOPIC - 9
IND AS – 20 ACCOUNTING FOR GOVERNMENT GRANTS AND
DISCLOSURE OF GOVT. ASSISTANCE
QUESTION 37: (SIMILAR TO RTP Nov’20)
([Link].304 - Question Bank)
Entity A is awarded a government grant of ₹60,000 receivable over three years (₹40,000 in year 1 and ₹10,000
in each of years 2 and 3), contingent on creating 10 new jobs and maintaining them for three years. The
employees are recruited at a total cost of ₹30,000, and the wage bill for the first year is ₹ 1,00,000, rising by
₹10,000 in each of the subsequent years. Calculate the grant income and deferred income to be accounted for
in the books for year 1, 2 and 3.
SOLUTION:
The income of ₹ 60,000 should be recognised over the three year period to compensate for the related costs.
Calculation of Grant Income and Deferred Income:
Year Labour Cost Grant Deferred
Income Income
₹ ₹ ₹
1 1,30,000 21,667 60,000 x (130/360) 18,333 (40,000 – 21,667)
2 1,10,000 18,333 60,000 x (110/360) 10,000 (50,000 – 21,667 – 18,333)
3 1,20,000 20,000 60,000 x (120/360) - (60,000 – 21,667 – 18,333 –
20,000)
3,60,000 60,000
Therefore, Grant income to be recognised in Profit & Loss for years 1, 2 and 3 are ₹ 21,667, ₹ 18,333 and
₹ 20,000 respectively.
Amount of grant that has not yet been credited to profit & loss i.e.; deferred income is to be reflected in the
balance sheet. Hence, deferred income balance as at year end 1, 2 and 3 are ₹ 18,333, ₹ 10,000 and Nil
respectively.
QUESTION 38
([Link].401 - Question Bank)
A Limited received from the government a loan of Rs. 50,00,000 @ 5% payable after 5 years in a bulleted
payment. The prevailing market rate of interest is 12%. Interest is payable regularly at the end of each year.
Calculate the amount of government grant and Pass necessary journal entry. Also examine how the
Government grant be realized.
SOLUTION
The fair value of the loan is calculated at Rs. 37,38,328.
Year Opening Balance Interest Interest paid @ 5% Closing Balance
calculated @ on Rs 50,00,000 +
12% principal paid
(a) (b) (c) = (b) x 12% (d) (e) =(b) + (c) – (d)
1. 37,38,328 4,48,600 2,50,000 39,36,928
2. 39,36,928 4,72,431 2,50,000 41,59,359
3. 41,59,359 4,99,123 2,50,000 44,08,482
4. 44,08,482 5,29,018 2,50,000 46,87,500
5. 46,87,500 5,62,500 52,50,000 Nil
A Limited will recognise Rs. 12,61,672 (Rs. 50,00,000 – Rs. 37,38,328) as the government grant and will
make the following entry on receipt of loan:
Bank Account Dr. 50,00,000
To Deferred Income 12,61,672
V'Smart Academy Page | 49
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
Rs.12,61,672 is to be recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which A Limited
recognised as expenses the related costs for which the grant is intended to compensate.
QUESTION 39
([Link].402 - Question Bank)
Continuing with the facts given in the [Link].401, state how the grant will be recognized in the
statement of profit or loss assuming:
(a) The loan is an immediate relief measure to rescue the enterprise
(b) The loan is a subsidy for staff training expenses, incurred equally, for a period of 4 years
The loan is to finance a depreciable asset.
SOLUTION
Rs. 12,61,672 is to be recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which A Limited
recognised as expenses the related costs for which the grant is intended to compensate.
Assuming (a), the loan is an immediate relief measure to rescue the enterprise. Rs. 12,61,672 will be
recognised in profit or loss immediately.
Assuming (b), the loan is a subsidy for staff training expenses, incurred equally, for a period of 4 years. Rs.
12,61,672 will be recognised in profit or loss over a period of 4 years.
Assuming (c), the loan is to finance a depreciable asset. Rs. 12,61,672 will be recognised in profit or loss
on the same basis as depreciation.
Rainbow Limited to commence the research, yet the grant will be recognised immediately in profit or loss
for the year ended 31st March, 20X2.
Alternatively, in case, the grant is conditional as to expenditure on research, the grant will be recognised
in the books of Rainbow Limited over the year the expenditure is being incurred.
2. Second Grant
The second grant related to commercial development of a new equipment is a grant related to depreciable
asset. As per the information given in the question, the equipment will be available for sale in the market
from April, 20X3. Hence, by that time, grant relates to the construction of an asset and should be initially
recognised as deferred income.
The deferred income should be recognised as income on a systematic and rational basis over the asset's
useful life.
The entity should recognise a liability on the balance sheet for the years ending 31st March, 20X2 and 31st
March, 20X3. Once the equipment starts being used in the manufacturing process, the deferred grant
income of ₹ 100,000 should be recognised over the asset's useful life to compensate for depreciation costs.
Alternatively, as per Ind AS 20, Rainbow Limited would also be permitted to offset the deferred income of
₹ 100,000 against the cost of the equipment as on 1st April, 20X3.
SOLUTION
As per the principles of Ind AS 20 “Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government
Assistance”, the benefits of a government loan at a below market rate of interest is treated as a government
grant. The loan shall be recognized and measured in accordance with Ind AS 109 “Financial Instruments”.
The benefit of the below market rate of interest shall be measured as the difference between the initial
carrying value of the loan determined in accordance with Ind AS 109 and the proceeds received. The benefit
is accounted for in accordance with Ind AS 20. As per Ind AS 109, the loan should be initially measured at
its fair value.
Initial recognition of grant as on 1st April, 20X1
Fair value of loan = Rs. 25,00,000 x 0.567 (PVF @ 12%, 5th year) = Rs. 14,17,500
A Limited will recognize Rs. 10,82,500 (25,00,000 – 14,17,500) as the government grant and will make the
following entry on receipt of loan:
Journal Entries
Date Particulars Dr. (Rs.) Cr. (Rs.)
31.3.20X Depreciation (Profit or Loss A/c) Dr. 10,00,000
2 To Property, Plant & Equipment 10,00,000
(Being depreciation provided for the
year)
Deferred grant income Dr. 2,16,500
To Profit or Loss 2,16,500
(Being deferred income adjusted)
Impact on profit or loss due to revocation of government grant as on 31st March 20X3
As per para 32 of Ind AS 20, a government grant that becomes repayable shall be accounted for as a
change in accounting estimate. Repayment of a grant related to income shall be applied first against any
unamortised deferred credit recognised in respect of the grant. To the extent that the repayment exceeds
any such deferred credit, or when no deferred credit exists, the repayment shall be recognised
immediately in profit or loss.
V'Smart Academy Page | 52
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
Journal Entries
Date Particulars Dr. (Rs.) Cr. (Rs.)
31.3.20X Deferred grant income Dr. 2,16,500
3 To Profit or Loss 2,16,500
(Being deferred income adjusted)
Loan account (W.N.1) Dr. 17,78,112
Deferred grant income (W.N.2) Dr. 6,49,500
Profit or Loss Dr. 72,388
To Government grant payable 25,00,000
(Being refund of government grant)
Profit or Loss Dr. 10,00,000
To Government grant payable (Being 10,00,000
penalty payable to government)
Therefore, total impact on profit or loss on account of revocation of government grant as on 31st March,
20X3 will be Rs. 10,72,388 (10,00,000 + 72,388).
Circumstances giving rise to repayment of a grant related to an asset may require consideration to be
given to the possible impairment of the new carrying amount of the asset.
Working Notes:
1. Amortisation Schedule of Loan
Year Opening balance Interest @ Closing balance
of Loan 12% of Loan
31.03.20X2 14,17,500 1,70,100 15,87,600
31.03.20X3 15,87,600 1,90,512 17,78,112
Note:
In the above solution, Income and Interest Expense is recognised in the year X2-X3 i.e. in the year of
refund order. Alternatively, both can also be ignored (not to be recognised) since refund order is already
recorded in march month. Therefore, entry would be:-
cost of Rs. 6 lakh, and the maintenance cost for financial year 2019-2020 is Rs. 12 lakh, for financial
year 2020-2021 is Rs. 15 lakh and for financial year 2021-2022 is Rs. 17 lakh.
Calculate the grant income and deferred income to be accounted for in the books for financial years 2019-
2020, 2020-2021 & 2021-2022.
SOLUTION
(i) At 31st March, 2020 the grant would be recognised as a liability and presented in the balance sheet as
a split between current and non-current amounts.
Rs. 16 lakh [(12 months / 18 month) x 24 lakh] is current and would be recognised in profit and loss
for the year ended 31st March, 2021. The balance amount of Rs. 8 lakh will be shown as non-current.
At the end of the year 2020-2021, there would be a current balance of Rs. 8 lakh (being the non-current
balance at the end of year 2019-2020 reclassified as current) in the balance sheet. This would be
recognised as profit in the statement of profit and loss for the year ended on 2021-2022.
(ii) The income of Rs. 10 lakh should be recognised over the three-year period to compensate forthe related
costs. Since the receipt of grant is depending on fulfilling the contract, it is assumed that on initial date
certainty to fulfil the conditions by the entity could not be established. Hence, the grant is recognised
in the books on receipt basis.
TOPIC - 10
IND AS 21 – THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FOREIGN
EXCHANGE RATES
₹ ₹
Machinery A/c (5,000 x $ 60) Dr. 3,00,000
To Trade Payables 3,00,000
(Initial transaction will be recorded at exchange rate on the
date of transaction)
Exchange difference arising on translating monetary & non-monetary item on 31st March 20X1:
₹ ₹
Profit & Loss A/c Dr. 25,000
[(5,000 x $ 65) – (5,000 x $ 60)] 25,000
To Trade Payables
Machinery A/c Dr. 32,500
To Revaluation Surplus (OCI) 32,500
[Being Machinery revalued to USD 5,500; (₹ 65 x (USD 5,500
- USD 5,000)]
Machinery A/c Dr. 25,000
To Revaluation Surplus (OCI) 25,000
(Being Machinery measured at the exchange rate on 31-03-
20X1 [USD 5,000 x (₹ 65 - ₹ 60)]
Revaluation Surplus (OCI) Dr. 17,250
To Deferred Tax Liability 17,250
(DTL created @ of 30% of the total OCI amount)
Exchange difference arising on translating monetary item and settlement of creditors on 31st March 20X2:
₹ ₹
Trade Payables A/c (5,000 x $65) Dr. 3,25,000
Profit & loss A/c [(5,000 x ($ 67 -$ 65)] Dr. 10,000
To Bank A/c 3,35000
Machinery A/c Dr. 11,000
To Revaluation Surplus (OCI) 11,000
Revaluation Surplus (OCI) Dr. 3,300
To Deferred Tax Liability 3,300
(DTL created @ of 30% of the total OCI amount)
Ind AS 21, "The Effect of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates" states that foreign currency transactions are
initially recorded at the rate of exchange in force when the transaction was first recognized.
Loan to be converted in INR = 58,00,000 FCY x ₹ 2.50/FCY
= ₹ 1,45,00,000
M Ltd sold pharmaceuticals bottles to G Ltd for Euro 12 lacs on 1st February, 20X1. The cost of these bottles
was ₹830 lacs in the books of M Ltd at the time of sale. At the year-end i.e. 31st March, 20X1, all these bottles
were lying as closing stock with G Ltd. What should be the accounting treatment for the above?
Following additional information is available:
Exchange rate on 1st February, 20X1 1 Euro = ₹83
Exchange rate on 31st March, 20X1 1 Euro = ₹85
SOLUTION:
Accounting treatment in the books of M Ltd
M Ltd will recognize sales of ₹996 lacs (12 lacs Euro X 83)
Profit on sale of inventory = 996 lacs – 830 lacs = ₹166 lacs.
On balance sheet date receivable from G Ltd. will be translated at closing rate i.e. 1 Euro = ₹ 85. Therefore,
unrealised forex gain will be recorded in standalone profit and loss of ₹ 24 lacs. (i.e. (85 - 83) x 12 Lacs)
Journal Entries
₹ (in Lacs) ₹ (in Lacs)
G Ltd. A/c Dr 996
To Sales 996
(Being revenue recorded on initial recognition)
G Ltd. A/c Dr 24
To Foreign exchange difference (unrealised) 24
(Being foreign exchange difference recorded at year end)
Balance Sheet
Particulars 31st March, 20X3 31st March, 20X2
USD USD
Property, plant and equipment 50,000 55,000
Trade Receivables 68,500 56,000
Inventory 8,000 5,000
Cash 40,000 35,000
Total assets 1,66,500 1,51,000
Share Capital 50,000 50,000
Retained earnings 29,500 18,000
Total Equity 79,500 68,000
Trade payables 40,000 38,000
Loan 47,000 45,000
Total liabilities 87,000 83,000
Total equity and liabilities 1,66,500 1,51,000
Revenue 1,77,214
Dividends (3,000)
● Share capital was issued when the exchange rate was USD 1 = INR 70.
● Retained earnings on 1st April, 20X1 was INR 4,00,000.
● At 31st March, 20X2, a cumulative gain of INR 4,92,000 has been recognised in the foreign
exchange reserve, which is due to translation of entity’s financial statements into INR in the
previous years.
● Entity paid a dividend of USD 3,000 when the rate of exchange was USD 1 = INR 73.5
● Profit for the year 20X1-20X2 of USD 8,000, translated in INR at INR 5,72,000.
● Profit for the year 20X2-20X3 of USD 14,500, translated in INR at INR 10,72,985.
For the sake of simplicity, items of income and expense are translated at weighted average monthly rate as
there has been no significant exchange rate fluctuation during the entire year and the business of the entity is
not cyclical in nature.
Relevant exchange rates are as follows:
● Rate at 31st March, 20X2 USD 1= INR 73
● Rate at 31st March, 20X3 USD 1= INR 75
Prepare financial statements of Infotech Global Ltd. translated from functional currency (USD) to presentation
currency (INR).
SOLUTION:
As per paragraph 39 of Ind AS 21, all assets and liabilities are translated at the closing exchange rate, which
is USD 1 = INR 73 on 31st March, 20X2 and USD 1 = INR 75 on 31st March, 20X3.
In the given case, share capital is translated at the historical rate USD 1 = INR 70. The share capital will not
be restated at each year end. It will remain unchanged.
Accordingly, the translated financial statements will be as follows:
Note 1: Retained earnings at 31st March, 20X3 and 31st March, 20X2:
INR INR
Balance Sheet
Particulars 31st March, 20X3 31st March, 20X2
The foreign exchange reserve is the exchange difference resulting from translating income and expense at
the average exchange rate and assets and liabilities at the closing rate.
Other Comprehensive Income
Exchange differences on translating from USD to INR INR 1,46,015
(6,38,015 - 4,92,000)
Exchange difference
(transferred to OCI) - - 1,46,015 1,46,015
Balance at 31st March, 20X3 35,00,000 18,24,485 6,38,015 59,62,500
QUESTION 47:
([Link].103 – Question Bank)
A is an Oman based company having a foreign operation, B, in India. The foreign operation was primarily
set up to execute a construction project in India. The functional currency of A is OMR.
78% of entity B ’s finances have been raised in USD by way of contribution from A. B’s bank accounts are
maintained in USD as well as INR. Cash flows generated by B are transferred to A on a monthly basis in
USD in respect of repayment of finance received from A.
Revenues of B are in USD. Its competitors are globally based. Tendering for the construction project happened
in USD.
B incurs 70% of the cost in INR and remaining 30% costs in USD.
Since B is located in India, can it presume its functional currency to be INR?
SOLUTION:
No, B can-not presume INR to be its functional currency on the basis of its location. It needs to consider
various factors listed in Ind AS for determination of functional currency.
B can-not be said to have functional currency same as that of A Ltd.
Hence primary and secondary indicators should be used for the determination of functional currency of B
giving priority to primary indicators. The analysis is given below:
● Its significant revenues and competitive forces are in USD.
● Its significant portion of cost is incurred in INR. Only 30% costs are in USD.
● 78% of its finances have been raised in USD.
● It retains its operating cash flows partially in USD and partially in INR.
Keeping these factors in view, USD should be considered as the functional currency of B.
TOPIC - 11
INDAS 23 – BORROWING COSTS
QUESTION 48:
([Link].204 - Question Bank)
Alpha Ltd. on 1stApril 20X1 borrowed 9% ₹30,00,000 to finance the construction of two qualifying assets.
Construction started on 1st April 20X1. The loan facility was availed on 1st April 20X1 and was utilized as
follows with remaining funds invested temporarily at 7%.
Factory Building Office Building
1st April 20X1 5,00,000 10,00,000
1st October 20X1 5,00,000 10,00,000
Calculate the cost of the asset and the borrowing cost to be capitalized.
SOLUTION:
(b) Interest that would have resulted if the loan was taken in Indian Currency:
USD 20,000 x Rs. 45/USD x 11% = Rs. 99,000
(c) Difference between Interest on Foreign Currency borrowing and local Currency borrowing: Rs. 99,000 -
48,000 = Rs. 51,000
Hence, out of Exchange loss of Rs. 60,000 on principal amount of foreign currency loan, only exchange
loss to the extent of Rs. 51,000 is considered as borrowing costs.
QUESTION 50: (SIMILAR TO RTP May18, MTP May21 & Nov19 EXAMS)
([Link].304 - Question Bank)
An entity constructs a new head office building commencing on 1 st September 20X1, which
continues till 31st December20X1. Directly attributable expenditure at the beginning of the
month on this asset are Rs. 100,000 in September 20X1 and Rs. 250,000 in each of the
months of October to December 20X1.
The entity has not taken any specific borrowings to finance the construction of the asset but has incurred
finance costs on its general borrowings during the construction period. During the year, the entity had issued
10% debentures with a face value of Rs. 20 lacs and had an overdraft of Rs. 500,000, which increased to
Rs. 750,000 in December 20X1. Interest was paid on the overdraft at 15% until 1 October 20X1, then the rate
was increased to 16%.
Calculate the capitalization rate for computation of borrowing cost in accordance with Ind AS 23
‘Borrowing Costs’.
SOLUTION
Since the entity has only general borrowing hence first step will be to compute the capitalisation rate. The
capitalisation rate of the general borrowings of the entity during the period of construction is calculated
as follows:
Finance cost on Rs. 20 lacs 10% debentures during September – December 20X1 Rs. 66,667
Interest @ 15% on overdraft of Rs. 5,00,000 in September 20X1 Rs. 6,250
Interest @ 16% on overdraft of Rs. 5,00,000 in October and November 20X1 Rs. 13,333
Interest @ 16% on overdraft of Rs. 750,000 in December 20X1 Rs. 10,000
Total finance costs in September – December 20X1 Rs. 96,250
Capitalisation rate = Total finance costs during the construction period / Weighted average
borrowings during the construction period
= 96,250 / 25,62,500 = 3.756%
Capitalisation rate = Total finance costs / Weighted average borrowings = 2,79,583 / 25,20,833 =
11.09% p.a.; and for 4 Months = 11.09x4/12 = 3.70%
Assumption - Debentures and overdraft were existing from the beginning of the year. Question asks to
compute the total borrowing cost capitalization rate. Total borrowing cost using this rate will then be
divided between capitalized and expense.
The construction of building was completed by 31 st January, 20X2. Following the provisions of Ind AS 23
‘Borrowing Costs’, calculate the amount of interest to be capitalized and pass necessary journal entry for
capitalizing the cost and borrowing cost in respect of the building as on 31 st January, 20X2.
SOLUTION
(i) Calculation of capitalization rate on borrowings other than specific borrowings
Amount of loan (Rs.) Rate of Amount of
interest interest
(Rs.)
7,00,000 12% = 84,000
9,00,000 11% = 99,000
16,00,000 1,83,000
Weighted average rate of interest = 11.4375%
(1,83,000/16,00,000) x 100
(ii) Computation of borrowing cost to be capitalized for specific borrowings and general borrowings
based on weighted average accumulated expenses
Date of Amount Financed through Calculation Rs.
Incurrence of spent
expenditure
1st April, 20X1 1,50,000 Specific borrowing 1,50,000 x 9% x 10/12 11,250
1st August, 20X1 2,00,000 Specific borrowing 50,000 x 9% x 10/12 3,750
General borrowing 1,50,000 x 11.4375% x 6/12 8,578.125
1st October, 20X1 3,50,000 General borrowing 3,50,000 x 11.4375% x 4/12 13,343.75
1st January, 20X2 1,00,000 General borrowing 1,00,000 x 11.4375% x 1/12 953.125
37,875
Note: Since construction of building started on 1st April, 20X1, it is presumed that all the later
expenditures on construction of building had been incurred at the beginning of the respective
month.
cost)
(Being expenditure incurred on
construction of building and
borrowing cost thereon capitalized)
Note: In the above journal entry, it is assumed that interest amount will be paid at the year
end. Hence, entry for interest payable has been passed on 31.1.20X2.
Alternatively, following journal entry may be passed if interest is paid on the date of
capitalization:
Date Particulars Rs. Rs.
31.1.20X2 Building account Dr. 8,37,875
To Bank account 8,37,875
(Being expenditure incurred on construction of
building and borrowing cost thereon
capitalized)
Borrowing Costs eligible for capitalisation = 18.75 cr. x 10% = ₹ 1.875 cr.
*LT Ltd. cannot capitalise borrowing costs before 1st July, 20X1 (the day it starts to incur borrowing
costs). Accordingly, this calculation uses a capitalization period from 1st July, 20X1 to 31st March, 20X2
for this expenditure.
Construction Company
▪ No borrowings during the period.
▪ Financed Rs. 10,00,000 of expenditures on qualifying assets using its own cash resources.
Finance Company
▪ Raised Rs. 20,00,000 at 7% p.a. externally and issued a loan to Parent Company for general corporate
purposes at the rate of 8%.
Parent Company
▪ Used loan from Finance Company to acquire a new subsidiary.
▪ No qualifying assets apart from those in Real Estate Company and Construction Company.
▪ Parent Company did not issue any loans to other entities during the period.
What is the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation in the financial statements of
each of the four entities for the current reporting period 20X1-20X2?
SOLUTION
Following is the treatment as per Ind AS 23:
Finance Company
No expenditure on qualifying assets have been incurred, so Finance Company cannot capitalise anything.
Construction Company
No interest expense has been incurred, so Construction Company cannot capitalise anything.
SOLUTION:
As per Ind AS 23 ‘Borrowing Costs’, the commencement date for capitalisation of borrowing cost on
qualifying asset is the date when the entity first meets all of the following conditions:
(a) it incurs expenditures for the asset;
(b) it incurs borrowing costs; and
V'Smart Academy Page | 66
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
(c) it undertakes activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or
sale.
Further, an entity also does not suspend capitalising borrowing costs when a temporary delay is a
necessary part of the process of getting an asset ready for its intended use or sale. For example,
capitalisation continues during the extended period that high water levels delay construction of a bridge,
if such high-water levels are common during the construction period in the geographical region involved.
An entity shall cease capitalising borrowing costs when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare
the qualifying asset for its intended use or sale are complete.
Further, paragraph 23 explains that an asset is normally ready for its intended use or sale when the
physical construction of the asset is complete even though routine administrative work might still
continue. If minor modifications, such as the decoration of a property to the purchaser’s or user’s
specification, are all that are outstanding, this indicates that substantially all the activities are complete.
In the given case since the site planning work started for the project on 1st June, 20X2, the commencement
of capitalisation of borrowing cost will begin from 1st June, 20X2.
(i) When landslide is not common in Shimla and delay in approval from District Administration
Office is minor administrative work leftover
In such a situation, suspension of capitalisation of borrowing cost on construction work will be
considered for 3 months i.e. from October, 20X2 to December, 20X2 and cessation of capitalization
of borrowing cost shall stop at the time of completion of physical activities.
Accordingly, the borrowing cost to be capitalized will be effectively for 6 months i.e. from 1st June,
20X2 to 30th September, 20X2 and then from 1st January, 20X3 to 28th February, 20X3 i.e. total
6 months. The amount of borrowing cost will be ` 6,00,000 (1,00,00,000 x 6/12 x 12%).
(ii) When landslide is common in Shimla and delay in approval from District Administration Office
is major administrative work leftover
Since landslides are common in Shimla during monsoon period, there shall be no suspension of
capitalisation of borrowing cost during that period.
Further, an asset can be considered to be ready for its intended use only on receipt of approvals and
after compliance with regulatory requirements such as “Fire Clearances” etc. These are very
important to declare the asset as ready for its scheduled operation.
In the given case, obtaining the safety approval is a necessary condition that needs to be complied
with strictly and before obtaining the same the entity will not be able to use the building. Accordingly,
it is appropriate to continue capitalisation until the said approvals are obtained.
Hence, the capitalisation of the borrowing cost will be for 9.5 months i.e. from 1st June, 20X2 till
15th March, 20X3. The amount of borrowing cost will be ` 9,50,000 (1,00,00,000 x 9.5/12 x 12%).
TOPIC – 12
INDAS – 24
RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
Mr. X has a 100% investment in A Limited. He is also a member of the key management personnel (KMP) of C
Limited. B Limited has a 100% investment in C Limited.
Required
(a) Examine related party relationships from the perspective of C Limited for A Limited.
(b) Examine related party relationships from the perspective of C Limited for A Limited if Mr. X is a KMP of B
Limited and not C Limited.
(c) Will the outcome in (a) & (b) would be different if Mr. X has joint control over A Limited.
(d) Will the outcome in (a) & (b) would be different if Mr. X has significant influence over A Limited?
SOLUTION:
(a) A Limited is related to C Limited because Mr. X controls A Limited and is a member of KMP of C Limited.
(d) Yes, A Ltd. is not controlled by Mr. X. Therefore, despite Mr. X being KMP of C Ltd., A Ltd., having
significant influence of Mr. X, will not be considered as related party of C Limited.
Mr. X is a member of ‘key management personnel’ of the two entities (see (a) above) if, as seems likely, he
continues to direct their operating and financial policies. The substance of the relationship and not merely
the legal form should be considered. If Mr. X is regarded as a member of the key management personnel
of, say, entity A, entity B is a related party, because he exercises control or significant influence over entity
B by virtue of his control over the trust.
ABC Ltd. is a long-standing customer of XYZ Ltd. Mrs. P whose husband is a director in XYZ Ltd. purchased a
controlling interest in entity ABC Ltd. on 1st June, 20X1. Sales of products from XYZ Ltd. to ABC Ltd. in the
two-month period from 1st April 20X1 to 31st May 20X1 totalled ₹ 8,00,000. Following the share purchase by
Mrs. P, XYZ Ltd. began to supply the products at a discount of 20% to their normal selling price and allowed
ABC Ltd. three months' credit (previously ABC Ltd. was only allowed one month's credit, XYZ Ltd.'s normal
credit policy). Sales of products from XYZ Ltd. to ABC Ltd. in the ten-month period from 1st June 20X1 to 31st
March 20X2 totalled ₹ 60,00,000. On 31st March 20X2, the trade receivables of XYZ Ltd. included ₹ 18,00,000
in respect of amounts owing by ABC Ltd.
Analyse and show (where possible by quantifying amounts) how the above event would be reported in the
financial statements of XYZ Ltd. for the year ended 31st March 20X2 as per Ind AS. You are required to mention
the disclosure requirements as well.
SOLUTION:
XYZ Ltd. would include the total revenue of ₹ 68,00,000 (₹ 60,00,000 + ₹8,00,000) from ABC Ltd.
received/receivable in the year ended 31st March 20X2 within its revenue and show ₹ 18,00,000 within
trade receivables at 31st March 20X2.
Mrs. P would be regarded as a related party of XYZ Ltd. because she is a close family member of one of the
key management personnel of XYZ Ltd.
From 1st June 20X1, ABC Ltd. would also be regarded as a related party of XYZ Ltd. because from that
date ABC Ltd. is an entity controlled by another related party.
Because ABC Ltd. is a related party with whom XYZ Ltd. has transactions, then XYZ Ltd. should disclose:
– The nature of the related party relationship.
– The revenue of ₹ 60,00,000 from ABC Ltd. since 1st June 20X1.
– The outstanding balance of ₹ 18,00,000 at 31st March 20X2.
In the current circumstances it may well be necessary for XYZ Ltd. to also disclose the favourable terms
under which the transactions are carried out.
SOLUTION:
Paragraph 9 of Ind as 24 related party disclosure defines related party transactions as under:
“A Related party transaction is a transfer of resources, service or obligations between a reporting entity
and the related party, regardless of whether a price is charged.”
In the given case, there is a transfer of resources to the extent of Rs. 12 Lac from the company to the parent
towards software license. Of this transfer of resources the company has consumed the benefit relating to
Rs. 3 lacs of software license cost which is recognise in profit or loss. The benefit relating to Rs. 9 lacs of
software license cost will be consumed in the next reporting period and therefore is recognized in the
balance sheet as prepaid expenses.
TOPIC - 13
INDAS 28 - INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES & JV
QUESTION 59
([Link].205 - Question Bank)
A Ltd. acquired 40% share in B Ltd. on April 01, 20X1 for Rs. 10 lacs. On that date B Ltd. had 1,00,000 equity
shares of Rs10 each fully paid and accumulated profits of Rs. 2,00,000.
During the year 20X1-20X2, B Ltd. suffered a loss of Rs. 10,00,000.
During 20X2-20X3 loss of Rs. 12,50,000 and during 20X3-20X4 again a loss of Rs. 5,00,000. Show the
extract of consolidated balance sheet of A Ltd. on all the four dates recording the above events.
Solution
Calculation of Goodwill/Capital Reserve under Equity Method
Particulars Rs
Equity Shares 10,00,000
Reserves & Surplus 2,00,000
Net Assets 12,00,000
40% of Net Asset 4,80,000
Less: Cost of Investment (10,00,000)
Goodwill 5,20,000
Note: Investment can be remeasured downward due to post acquisition losses in associate/JV, in that
case first investment will be reduced and then goodwill. However, it can-not be negative.
QUESTION 60
([Link].207 - Question Bank)
AT Ltd. purchased a 100% subsidiary for Rs. 50,00,000 on 31st March 20X1 when the fair value of the BT
Ltd. whose net assets was Rs. 40,00,000. Therefore, goodwill is Rs. 10,00,000. The AT Ltd. sold 60% of its
investment in BT Ltd. on 31st March 20X3 for Rs. 67,50,000, leaving the AT Ltd. with 40% and significant
influence. At the date of disposal, the carrying value of net assets of BT Ltd., excluding goodwill is Rs.
80,00,000. Assume the fair value of the investment in associate BT Ltd. retained is proportionate to the fair
value of the 60% sold, that is Rs. 45,00,000.
Calculate gain or loss on sale of proportion of BT Ltd. in AT Ltd’s separate and consolidated
financial statements as on 31st March 20X3.
SOLUTION:
QUESTION 61: (MTP Nov’22 & Nov’22 EXAM & RTP Nov’20, MTP May’24)
([Link].209 - Question Bank)
On 1st April 2019, Investor Ltd. acquired 35% interest in another entity, XYZ Ltd. Investor Ltd. determines that
it is able to exercise significant influence over XYZ Ltd. Investor Ltd. has paid total consideration of Rs.
47,50,000 for acquisition of its interest in XYZ Ltd. At the date of acquisition, the book value of XYZ Ltd.’s net
assets was Rs. 90,00,000 and their fair value was Rs. 1,10,00,000. Investor Ltd. has determined that the
difference of Rs. 20,00,000 pertains to an item of property, plant and equipment (PPE) which has remaining
useful life of 10 years.
During the year, XYZ Ltd. made a profit of Rs. 8,00,000. XYZ Ltd. paid a dividend of Rs. 12,00,000 on 31st
March, 2020. XYZ Ltd. also holds a long-term investment in equity securities. Under Ind AS, investment is
classified as at FVTOCI in accordance with Ind AS 109 and XYZ Ltd. recognized an increase in value of
investment by Rs. 2,00,000 in OCI during the year. Ignore deferred tax implications, if any.
Calculate the closing balance of Investor Ltd.’s investment in XYZ Ltd. as at 31 st March, 2020 as
per the relevant Ind AS.
SOLUTION
Calculation of Investor Ltd.’s investment in XYZ Ltd. under equity method:
Rs. Rs.
Acquisition of investment in XYZ Ltd.
A. Cost of investment 47,50,000
less: Share in book value of XYZ Ltd.’s net assets (35% of Rs. 90,00,000) 31,50,000
less: Share in fair valuation of XYZ Ltd.’s net assets [35% of (Rs.
1,10,00,000 – Rs. 90,00,000)] 7,00,000
Goodwill on investment in XYZ Ltd. 9,00,000
B. Profit during the year
Share in the profit reported by XYZ Ltd. (35% of Rs. 8,00,000) 2,80,000
Adjustment to reflect effect of fair valuation [35% of (Rs. 20,00,000/10
years)] - depreciation on the increased value (70,000)
Share of profit in XYZ Ltd. recognised in income by Investor Ltd. 2,10,000
C. Long term equity investment
FVTOCI gain recognised in OCI (35% of Rs. 2,00,000) 70,000
D. Dividend received by Investor Ltd. during the year [35% of Rs. (4,20,000)
12,00,000]
Closing balance of Investor Ltd.’s investment in XYZ Ltd. (A+B+C+D) 46,10,000
QUESTION 62
([Link].601 - Question Bank)
An entity has following three type interests in an associate:
● Equity shares: 25% of the equity shares to which equity method of accounting is applied
● Preference shares: Non-cumulative preference shares that form part of net investment in
the associate. Such preference shares are measured at fair value as per Ind AS 109.
● Long-term loan: The loan carrying interest of 10% p.a. The interest income is received at the end of
each year. The long-term loan is accounted as per amortised cost as per Ind AS 109. This loan also
forms part of net investment in the associate.
At the start of year 1, the carrying value of each of the above interests is as follows:
● Equity shares – Rs. 10,00,000
● Preference shares – Rs. 5,00,000
● Long-term loan – Rs. 3,00,000
Following table summarises the changes in the fair value of preference shares as per Ind AS 109,
impairment loss on long-term loan as per Ind AS 109 and entity’s share in profit / loss of associate for year
1-5.
Rs.
End Increase / (Decrease) in Impairment loss / Entity’s share in
of fair value of preference (reversal) on long-term profit / (loss) of
Year shares as per Ind AS 109 loan as per Ind AS 109 associate
1 (50,000) (50,000) (16,00,000)
2 (50,000) - (2,00,000)
3 1,00,000 50,000 -
4 50,000 - 1000,000
5 30,000 - 10,00,000
Throughout year 1 to 5, there has been no objective evidence of impairment in the net investment in the
associate. The entity does not have any legal or constructive obligation to share the losses of the associate
beyond its interest in the associate.
Based on above, determine the closing balance of each of the above interests at the end of each
year.
SOLUTION:
Year 1 below table summarises the closing balance of each of the interest at the end of year 1:
Rs.
Type of interest Opening Adjustment Balance after Share in Closing
balance at the as per Ind applying Ind profit / (loss) balance at
start of the AS 109 AS 109 of the end of
year Associate the year
(A) (B) (A+B) (D) (C+D)
Equity shares 10,00,000 NA 10,00,000 (10,00,000) -
Preference shares 5,00,000 (50,000) 4,50,000 (4,50,000) -
Long-term loan 3,00,000 (50,000) 2,50,000 (1,50,000) 1,00,000
Total 18,00,000 (1,00,000) 17,00,000 (16,00,000) 1,00,000
The entire loss of Rs. 16,00,000 is recognised. Hence, there is no unrecognized loss at the end of year 1.
Year 2
Below table summarises the closing balance of each of the interest at the end of year 2:
Rs.
Type of interest Opening Adjustment as Balance after Share in Closing
balance at the per Ind AS 109 applying Ind profit / (loss) balance at the
start of AS 109 of Associate end of
the year the year
(A) (B) (A+B) (D) (C+D)
Equity shares - NA - - -
Preference shares - (50,000) (50,000) 50,000* -
Long-term loan 1,00,000 - 1,00,000 (1,00,000) -
Total 1,00,000 (1,00,000) 17,00,000 (50,000) -
* Recognition of changes in fair value as per Ind AS 109 has resulted in the carrying amount of Preference
shares being negative Rs. 50,000. Consequently, the entity shall reverse a portion of the associate’s losses
previously allocated to Preference shares.
Out of the total loss of Rs. 2,00,000 for the year, loss of only Rs. 50,000 is recognized. Hence, there is un-
recognized loss to the extent of Rs. 1,50,000 at the end of year 2.
Year 3
Below table summarises the closing balance of each of the interest at the end of year 3:
Rs.
Type of interest Opening Adjustment Balance Share in profit Closing
balance at the as per Ind after / (loss) of balance at the
start of AS 109 applying Associate end of the
the year Ind year
AS 109
(A) (B) (A+B) (D) (C+D)
Equity shares - NA - - -
Preference shares - 1,00,000 1,00,000 (1,00,000) -
Long-term loan - 50,000 50,000 (50,000) -
Total - 1,50,000 1,50,000 (1,50,000) -
The share in profit / loss for the year is nil. However, there was previously unrecognised loss of Rs.
1,50,000 which is allocated in current year. After recognising the above loss, there is no unrecognised loss
at the end of year 3.
Year 4
Below table summarises the closing balance of each of the interest at the end of year 4:
Rs.
Type of interest Opening Adjustment Balance Share in Closing
balance at the as per Ind after profit / (loss) balance at the
start of the AS 109 applying of Associate end of the
year Ind year
AS 109
(A) (B) (A+B) (D) (C+D)
Equity shares - NA - 2,00,000 2,00,000
Preference shares - 50,000 50,000 5,00,000 5,50,000
Long-term loan - - - 3,00,000 3,00,000
Total - 50,000 50,000 10,00,000 10,50,000
The entity’s share in profit of associate for the year is Rs. 10,00,000. The entity shall allocate such profit to
each of the instruments in order of their seniority in liquidation. The entity should limit the amount of
profit to be allocated to preference shares and long-term loan to the extent of losses previously allocated to
them. Hence, the entity has allocated Rs. 5,00,000 to preference shares and Rs. 3,00,000 to long-term
debt.
There is no unrecognised loss at the end of year 4.
Year 5
Below table summarises the closing balance of each of the interest at the end of year 5:
Rs.
Type of interest Opening Adjustment Balance Share in Closing
balance at the as per Ind after profit / (loss) balance at the
start of AS 109 applying of Associate end of the
the year Ind year
AS 109
(A) (B) (A+B) (D) (C+D)
Equity shares 2,00,000 NA 2,00,000 10,00,000 12,00,000
Preference shares 5,50,000 30,000 5,80,000 - 5,80,000
Long-term loan 3,00,000 - 3,00,000 - 3,00,000
Total 10,50,000 30,000 10,80,000 10,00,000 20,80,000
The entity’s share in profit of associate for the year is Rs. 10,00,000. The entire profit is allocated to equity
shares since there is no loss previously allocated to either preference shares or long-term loan.
There is no recognized loss at the end of year 5.
Year 1 to 5
The interest accrual on long-term loan would be done in each year at 10% p.a. This will be done without
taking into account any adjustment done in the carrying value of long-term loan as per Ind AS 28. Hence,
the entity will accrue interest of Rs. 30,000 (3,00,000 x 10%) in each year.
The carrying amount of the investment in the associate on 31st March, 20X2 was therefore Rs. 8,850 crore
(8,000 + 700 + 100 + 50).
On 1st April, 20X2, PQR Ltd. acquired the remaining 70% of XYZ Ltd. for cash Rs. 25,000 crore. The following
additional information is relevant at that date:
(Rs. in crore)
Fair value of the 30% interest already owned 9,000
Fair value of XYZ's identifiable net assets 30,000
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of Goodwill
(Rs. in crore)
Cash consideration 25,000
Add: Fair value of previously held equity interest in XYZ Ltd. 9,000
Total consideration 34,000
Less: Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired (30,000)
Goodwill 4,000
2. The credit to retained earnings represents the reversal of the unrealized gain of Rs. 50 crore in Other
Comprehensive Income related to the revaluation of property, plant and equipment. In accordance with
Ind AS 16, this amount is not reclassified to profit or loss.
3. The gain on the previously held equity interest in XYZ Ltd. is calculated as follows:
(Rs. in crore)
Fair Value of 30% interest in XYZ Ltd. at 1st April, 20X2 9,000
Carrying amount of interest in XYZ Ltd. at 1st April, 20X2 (8,850)
150
Unrealised gain previously recognized in OCI 100
Gain on previously held interest in XYZ Ltd. recognized in profit or loss 250
TOPIC - 14
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
INDAS-109, 32 & 107
Required
What is the amount transferred to the OCI at the end of Year 1?
Answer
The amount of change in fair value of the bond that is not attributable to changes in market conditions
giving rise to market risk is estimated as follows:
Step (a)
The bond’s IRR at the start of the period is 8%.
Step (b)
Because the benchmark interest rate (SOFR) is 5%, the instrument - specific component of the IRR is 3%.
Step (c)
The contractual cash flows of the instrument at the end of the period are:
• Interest of Rs. 1,20,000 [Rs. 15,00,000 x 8%] per year for the next 9 years.
• Principal repayment of Rs. 15,00,000 at the end of 9th year.
The present value of these cash flows is calculated using a discount rate of 7.75%. This rate is arrived at as
below:
• 4.75% end of period SOFR, plus
• 3% instrument - specific component calculated as at the start of the period
This gives a notional present value of Rs. 15,23,670
= [(15,00,000 x 0.511) + (1,20,000 x 6.312)].
Step (d)
The fair value of the liability at the end of the period is Rs. 15,38,110. Hence, ABC Ltd. should present Rs.
14,440 [Rs. 15,38,110 – Rs. 15,23,670] in the OCI.
SOLUTION
In the financial statements of A Ltd., the carrying amount of the debenture is allocated on issue as
follows:
Rs.
Liability component
Present value of 20 half-yearly interest payments of
Rs. 598
50, discounted at 11% (Rs. 50 x 11.95)
Present value of Rs. 1,000 due in 10 years, discounted
at 11%, compounded half-yearly (Rs. 1,000 x 0.342) 342
940
Equity component
Difference between Rs. 1,000 total proceeds and Rs.
940 allocated above 60
Total proceeds 1,000
The debt settlement expense represents the difference between the carrying value of the debt component
and its fair value.
QUESTION 66: (MTP Nov’22 & RTP Nov’20 & RTP Nov’19)
([Link].306 - Question Bank)
An Indian entity, whose functional currency is rupees, purchases USD denominated bonds at its fair value of
USD 1,000. The bond carries stated interest @ 4.7% p.a. on its face value. The said interest is received at the
year end. The bond has maturity period of 5 years and is redeemable at its face value of USD 1,250. The fair
value of the bond at the end of year 1 is USD 1,060. The exchange rate on the date of transaction and at the
end of year 1 are USD 1 = Rs 40 and USD 1 = Rs 45, respectively. The weighted average exchange rate for the
year is 1 USD = Rs 42.
The entity has determined that it is holding the bond as part of an investment portfolio whose objective is met
both by holding the asset to collect contractual cash flows and selling the asset. The purchased USD bond is
to be classified under the FVTOCI category.
The bond results in an effective interest rate (EIR) of 10% p.a. Calculate gain or loss to be recognised in Profit
& Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for year 1. Also pass journal entry to recognise gain or loss on above.
(Round off the figures to nearest rupees)
SOLUTION:
Computation of amounts to be recognized in the P&L & OCI:
Particulars USD Exchange Rs
rate
Cost of the bond 1,000 40 40,000
Interest accrued @ 10% p.a. 100 42 4,200
Interest received (USD 1,250 x 4.7%) (59) 45 (2,655)
Amortized cost at year-end 1,041 45 46,845
Fair value at year end 1,060 45 47,700
Interest income to be recognized in P & L 4,200
Exchange gain on the principal amount [1,000 x (45-40)] 5,000
Exchange gain on interest accrual [100 x (45 - 42)] 300
Total exchange gain/loss to be recognized in P&L 5,300
Fair value gain to be recognized in OCI [45 x (1,060 - 1,041)] 855
SOLUTION:
As the loan is not at a market interest rate, hence it is not recorded at the transaction price of Rs. 5,00,000.
Instead, the entity measures the loan receivable at the present value of the future cash inflows discounted
at a market rate of interest available for a similar loan.
The present value of the loan receivable (financial asset) discounted at 5% per year is Rs. 5,00,000 ÷ (1.05)3
= Rs. 4,32,000. Therefore, Rs. 4,32,000 is recorded on initial measurement of the loan receivable. This
amount will accrete to Rs. 5,00,000 over the three-year term using the effective interest method.
The difference between Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 4,32,000 i.e., Rs. 68,000 is accounted for as prepaid employee
cost in accordance with Ind AS 19 ‘Employee Benefits’, which will be deferred and amortised over the period
of loan on straight line basis.
The journal entries on initial recognition are:
Rs. Rs.
Loan receivable (financial asset) Dr. 4,32,000
Prepaid employee cost (asset) Dr. 68,000
To Cash / Bank (financial asset)
(Being loan granted to the employee recognised) 5,00,000
SOLUTION:
The loan taken by A Ltd shall be measured at amortised cost as follows:
- Initial measurement – At transaction price less processing fees = 10,000 – 500 = 9,500
- Subsequently – interest to be accrued using effective rate of interest as follows:
Date Amount Re- Upfront Amount Day IRR Revised Loan
of Loan paymen fees of s Calculatio Interest Balanc
t paid Interest n compute e
d
1-Apr-20X1 10,000 - 500 - - 9,500 - -
30-Jun-20X1 - - - 300 90 (300) 389 9,589
30-Sep-20X1 - 2500 - 300 92 (2,800) 401 7,190
31-Dec-20X1 - - - 225 92 (225) 301 7,266
31-Mar 20X2 - 2500 - 225 90 (2,725) 297 4,838
30-Jun-20X2 - - - 150 91 (150) 200 4,888
30-Sep-20X2 - 2500 - 150 92 (2,650) 204 2,442
31-Dec-20X2 - - - 75 92 (75) 102 2,473
31-Mar-20X3 - 2500 - 75 91 (2,575) 102 -
IRR 16.60%
(b) The stream of interest expense is summarised below, where interest for a given year is calculated
by multiplying the present value of the liability at the beginning of the period by the market rate of
interest, this is being 8 per cent.
Date Payment Interest expense at Increase in bond Total bond
8% liability liability
01 July 20X1 8,850,960
30 June 20X2 600,000 708,077 108,077 8,959,037
30 June 20X3 600,000 716,723 116,723 9,075,760
30 June 20X4 600,000 726,061 126,061 9,201,821
30 June 20X5 600,000 736,146 136,146 9,337,967
30 June 20X6 600,000 747,037 147,037 9,485,004
30 June 20X7 600,000 758,800 158,800 9,643,804
30 June 20X8 600,000 771,504 171,504 9,815,308
30 June 20X9 600,000 784,692* 184,692 10,000,000
*for rounding off
(c) if the holders of the options elect to convert the options to ordinary shares at the end of the third
year of the debentures (after receiving their interest payments), the entries in the third would be:
Dr. Amount Cr. Amount
(INR) (INR)
30 June 20X4
Interest expense Dr. 726,061
To Cash 600,000
To Convertible bonds (liability) 126,061
(Being entry to record interest expense for the period)
30 June 20X4
Convertible bonds (liability) Dr. 9,201,821
Convertible bonds (equity component) Dr. 1,149,040
To Contributed equity 10,350,861
(Being entry to record the conversion of bonds into
shares of A Limited).
QUESTION 70: (SIMILAR TO MTP Oct’21 & MTP Oct’19, May’19 EXAM, MTP May’23)
([Link].610 - Question Bank)
ABC Company issued 10,000 compulsory cumulative convertible preference shares (CCCPS) as on 1 April
20X1 @ Rs 150 each. The rate of dividend is 10% payable every year. The preference shares are convertible
into 5,000 equity shares of the company at the end of 5th year from the date of allotment. When the CCCPS
are issued, the prevailing market interest rate for similar debt without conversion options is 15% per annum.
Transaction cost on the date of issuance is 2% of the value of the proceeds.
Key terms:
Date of Allotment 01-Apr-20X1
Date of Conversion 01-Apr-20X6
Number of Preference Shares 10,000
Face Value of Preference Shares 150
Total Proceeds 15,00,000
Rate Of dividend 10%
Market Rate for Similar Instrument 15%
Transaction Cost 30,000
Face value of equity share after conversion 10
Number of equity shares to be issued 5,000
SOLUTION:
This is a compound financial instrument with two components – liability representing present value of
future cash outflows and balance represents equity component.
a. Computation of Liability & Equity Component
Date Particulars Cash Flow Discount Factor Net present Value
01-Apr-20X1 0 1 0.00
31-Mar-20X2 Dividend 150,000 0.869565 130,434.75
31-Mar-20X3 Dividend 150,000 0.756144 113,421.6
31-Mar-20X4 Dividend 150,000 0.657516 98,627.4
31-Mar-20X5 Dividend 150,000 0.571753 85,762.95
31-Mar-20X6 Dividend 150,000 0.497177 74,576.55
Total Liability Component 502,823.25
Total Proceeds 1,500,000.00
Total Equity Component (B/f) 997,176.75
On 1 January 20X5, the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial
liability is Rs. 10,00,000.
On this date, XYZ Ltd. will compute the present value of:
● cash flows under the new terms – i.e., Rs. 15,00,000 payable on 31 December 20Y1 and Rs. 50,000
payable for each of the 7 years ending 31 December 20Y1.
● any fee paid (net of any fee received) – i.e., Rs. 1,00,000
using the original effective interest rate of 10%.
The total of these amounts to Rs. 11,13,158 (Refer Working Note). This differs from the discounted present
value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial liability by 11.32% i.e., by more than 10%. Hence,
extinguishment accounting applies.
The next step is to estimate the fair value of the modified liability. This is determined as the present value
of the future cash flows (interest and principal), using an interest rate of 11% (the market rate at which XYZ
Ltd. could issue new bonds with similar terms). The estimated fair value on this basis is Rs. 958,097 (Refer
Working Note). A gain or loss on modification is then determined as:
Gain (loss) = carrying value of existing liability - fair value of modified liability - fees and costs incurred i.e.,
Rs. 10,00,000 – Rs. 9,58,097 – Rs. 1,00,000 = Loss of Rs. 58,097
Working Note:
Year Discount factor @ 10% Discount factor @ 11%
1 0.909091 0.900901
2 0.826446 0.811622
3 0.751315 0.731191
4 0.683013 0.658731
5 0.620921 0.593451
6 0.564474 0.534641
7 0.513158 0.481658
Annuity 4.868419 4.712196
QUESTION 72: (SIMILAR TO MTP Nov’22 & July’21 EXAM & Jan’21 EXAM,
May’23 Exam)
([Link].706 - Question Bank)
Wheel Co. Limited has a policy of providing subsidized loans to its employees for the purpose of
buying or building houses. Mr. X, who’s executive assistant to the CEO of Wheel Co. Limited,
took a loan from the Company on the following terms:
● Principal amount: 1,000,000
● Interest rate: 4% for the first 400,000 and 7% for the next 600,000
● Start date: 1 January 20X1
● Tenure: 5 years
● Pre-payment option: Full or partial pre-payment at the option of the employee
● The principal amount of loan shall be recovered in 5 equal annual installments and will be first applied to
7% interest bearing principal
(Amount in Rs)
Inflows
Date Outflows Principal Interest Interest Principal
income 7% income 4% outstanding
1-Jan-20X1 (1,000,000) 1,000,000
31-Dec-20X1 200,000 42,000 16,000 800,000
31-/Dec-20X2 200,000 28,000 16,000 600,000
31-Dec-20X3 200,000 14,000 16,000 400,000
31-Dec-20X4 200,000 - 16,000 200,000
31-Dec-20X5 200,000 - 8,000 -
Mr. X, pre-pays Rs 200,000 on 31 December 20X2, reducing the outstanding principal as at that date to Rs
400,000.
Following table shows the actual cash flows from the loan given to Mr. X, considering the pre-payment event
on 31 December 20X2:
(amount in Rs)
Inflows
Date Outflows Principal Interest Interest Principal
income 7% income 4% outstanding
1-Jan-20X1 (1,000,000) 1,000,000
31-Dec-20X1 200,000 42,000 16,000 800,000
31-Dec-20X2 400,000 28,000 16,000 400,000
31-Dec-20X3 200,000 - 16,000 200,000
31-Dec-20X4 200,000 - 8,000 -
31-Dec-20X5 - - - -
Record journal entries in the books of Wheel Co. Limited considering the requirements of Ind
AS 109.
SOLUTION:
As per requirement of Ind AS 109, a financial instrument is initially measured and recorded at its fair
value. Therefore, considering the market rate of interest of similar loan available to Mr. X is 12%, the fair
value of the contractual cash flows shall be as follows:
Inflows Discount
Date Principal Interest Interest factor @12% PV
income 7% income 4%
31-Dec-20X1 200,000 42,000 16,000 0.8929 2,30,357
31-Dec-20X2 200,000 28,000 16,000 0.7972 1,94,515
31-Dec-20X3 200,000 14,000 16,000 0.7118 1,63,709
31-Dec-20X4 200,000 - 16,000 0.6355 1,37,272
31-Dec-20X5 200,000 - 8,000 0.5674 1,18,025
Total (fair value) 8,43,878
Benefit to Mr. X, to be considered a part of employee cost for Wheel Co. Rs. 1,56,122
The deemed employee cost is to be amortised over the period of loan i.e. the minimum period that Mr. X
must remain in service.
The amortization schedule of the Rs 843,878 loan is shown in the following table:
Date Loan outstanding Total cash inflows (principal Interest @
repayment + interest 12%
1-Jan-20X1 843,878
31-Dec-20X1 687,143 258,000 101,265
31-Dec-20X2 525,600 244,000 82,457
31-Dec-20X3 358,672 230,000 63,072
31-Dec-20X4 185,713 216,000 43,041
b. 31 December 20X1 –
Particulars Dr. Amount Cr. Amount
(Rs) (Rs)
Cash A/c Dr. 258,000
To Interest income (P&L) @12% A/c 101,265
To loan to employee A/c 156,735
(Being first instalment of repayment of loan
accounted for using the amortised cost and effective
interest rate of 12%)
c. 31 December 20X2 –
Particulars Dr. Amount (Rs) Cr. Amount (Rs)
Cash A/c Dr. 244,000
To Interest income (P&L) @12% A/c 82,457
To loan to employee A/c 161,543
(Being second instalment of repayment of loan
accounted for using the amortised cost and effective
interest rate of 12%)
The difference between the amount of pre-payment and adjustment to loan shall be considered a gain,
though will be recorded as an adjustment to pre-paid employee cost, which shall be amortised over the
remaining tenure of the loan.
The amortisation schedule of the new carrying amount of loan shall be as follows:
Date Loan Total cash inflows (principal Interest @ 12%
outstanding repayment + interest
31-Dec-20X2 358,673
31-Dec-20X3 185,714 216,000 43,041
31-Dec-20X4 - 208,000 22,286
e. 31 December 20X3 –
Particulars Dr. Amount (Rs) Cr. Amount (Rs)
Cash A/c Dr. 216,000
To Interest income (P&L @12% A/c 43,041
To loan to employee A/c 172,959
(Being third instalment of repayment of loan
accounted for using the amortised cost and effective
interest rate of 12%)
Extinguishment Accounting
QUESTION 73: (SIMILAR TO MTP May’22, Dec’21 EXAM, MTP Oct’18, MTP May’23)
([Link].707 - Question Bank)
Wheel Co. Limited borrowed Rs 50,00,00,000 from a bank on 1 January 20X1. The original
terms of the loan were as follows:
● Interest rate: 11%
● Repayment of principal in 5 equal instalments
● Payment of interest annually on accrual basis
● Upfront processing fee: Rs 5,870,096
● Effective interest rate on loan: 11.50%
On 31 December 20X2, Wheel Co. Limited approached the bank citing liquidity issues in meeting the cash
flows required for immediate instalments and re-negotiated the terms of the loan with banks as follows:
● Interest rate 15%.
● Repayment of outstanding principal in 10 equal instalments starting 31 December 20X3
● Payment of interest on an annual basis
Record journal entries in the books of Wheel Co. Limited till 31 December 20X3, after giving effect
of the changes in the terms of the loan on 31 December 20X2
SOLUTION:
On the date of initial recognition, the effective interest rate of the loan shall be computed keeping in view
the contractual cash flows and upfront processing fee paid. The following table shows the amortisation of
loan based on effective interest rate:
Date Cash flows Cash flows Amortised cost Interest @ EIR
(principal) (interest and (opening + (11.50%)
fee) interest – cash
flows)
1-Jan-20X1 (500,000,000) 5,870,096 494,129,904
31-Dec-20X1 100,000,000 55,000,000 395,954,843 56,824,939
31-Dec-20X2 100,000,000 44,000,000 297,489,650 45,534,807
31-Dec-20X3 100,000,000 33,000,000 198,700,959 34,211,310
31-Dec-20X4 100,000,000 22,000,000 99,551,570 22,850,610
31-Dec-20X5 100,000,000 11,000,000 (0) 11,448,430
a. 1 January 20X1 –
Particulars Dr. Amount (Rs) Cr. Amount (Rs)
Cash A/c Dr. 494,129,904
To Loan from bank A/c 494,129,904
(Being loan recorded at its fair value less transaction costs
on the initial recognition date)
b. 31 December 20X1 –
Particulars Dr. Amount (Rs) Cr. Amount (Rs)
Loan from bank A/c Dr. 98,175,061
Interest expense (profit and loss) Dr. 56,824,939
To Cash A/c 155,000,000
(Being first instalment of loan and payment of interest
accounted for as an adjustment to the amortised cost
of loan)
Note: Calculation above done on full decimal, though in the table discount factor is limited to 4 decimals.
Considering a more than 10% change in PV of cash flows compared to the carrying value of the loan, the
existing loan shall be considered to have been extinguished and the new loan shall be accounted for as a
separate financial liability. The accounting entries for the same are included below:
e. 31 December 20X3
Particulars Dr. Amount (Rs) Cr. Amount (Rs)
Loan from bank A/c Dr. 40,000,000
Interest expense (profit and loss) Dr. 60,000,000
To cash A/c 100,000,000
(Being first instalment of the new loan and payment
of interest accounted for as an adjustment to the
amortised cost of loan)
including the applicable interest rates on such loans. The Board of Directors of the Company are evaluating
various options and has requested your firm to provide your views under Ind AS in following situations:
1. The Loan given by KK Ltd. to its wholly owned subsidiary YK Ltd. is interest free and such loan is
repayable on demand.
2. The said Loan is interest free and will be repayable after 3 years from the date of granting such loan. The
current market rate of interest for similar loans is 10%. Considering the same, the fair value of the loan at
initial recognition is Rs 8,10,150.
3. The said loan is interest free and will be repaid as and when the YK Ltd. has funds to repay the Loan
amount.
4. Further the Company is also planning to grant interest free loan from YK Ltd. to KK Ltd. in the subsequent
period. What will be the accounting treatment of the same under applicable Ind AS?
Based on the same, KK Ltd. has requested you to suggest the accounting treatment of the above
loan in the stand-alone financial statements of KK Ltd. and YK Ltd. and also in the consolidated
financial statements of the group. Consider interest for only one year for the above loan.
SOLUTION
Scenario (i)
Since the loan is repayable on demand, it has fair value equal to cash consideration given. KK Ltd. and YK
Ltd. should recognize financial assets and liability, respectively, at the amount of loan given (assuming
that loan is repayable within a year). Upon repayment, both the entities should reverse the entries that
were made at the origination.
Scenario (ii)
Applying the guidance in Ind AS 109, a ‘financial asset’ shall be recorded at its fair value upon initial
recognition. Fair value is normally the transaction price. However, sometimes certain types of instruments
may be exchanged at off market terms (i.e., different from market terms for a similar instrument if exchanged
between market participants).
If a long-term loan or receivable that carries no interest while similar instruments if exchanged between
market participants carry interest, then the fair value for such loan receivable will be lower from its
transaction price owing to the loss of interest that the holder bears. In such cases where part of the
consideration given or received is for something other than the financial instrument, an entity shall measure
the fair value of the financial instrument. The difference in fair value and transaction cost will be treated as
investment in Subsidiary YK Ltd.
Both KK Ltd. and YK Ltd. should recognise financial asset and liability, respectively, at fair value on initial
recognition, i.e., the present value of Rs10,00,000 payable at the end of 3 years using discounting factor of
10%. Since the question mentions fair value of the loan at initial recognition as Rs8,10,150, the same has
been considered. The difference between the loan amount and its fair value is treated as an equity
contribution to the subsidiary. This represents a further investment by the parent in the subsidiary.
Journal entries in the books of KK Ltd. (holding Company) (for one year)
At origination
Loan to YK Ltd. A/c Dr. Rs 8,10,150
Investment in YK Ltd. A/c Dr. Rs 1,89,850
To Bank A/c Rs 10,00,000
During periods to repayment- to recognise interest
Year 1 – Charging of Interest
Loan to YK Ltd. A/c Dr. Rs 81,015
To Interest income A/c Rs 81,015
Transferring of interest to Profit and Loss
Interest income A/c Dr. Rs 81,015
To Profit and Loss A/c Rs 81,015
On repayment
Bank A/c Dr. Rs 10,00,000
To Loan to YK Ltd. A/c Rs 10,00,000
Note- Interest needs to be recognised in statement of profit and loss. The same cannot be adjusted
against capital contribution recognised at origination.
Journal entries in the books of YK Ltd. (Subsidiary Company) (for one year)
At origination
Bank A/c Dr. Rs 10,00,000
To Loan from KK Ltd. A/c Rs 8,10,150
To Equity Contribution in KK Ltd. A/c Rs 1,89,850
During periods to repayment- to recognise interest
Year 1
Interest expense A/c Dr. Rs 81,015
To Loan from KK Ltd. A/c Rs 81,015
On repayment
Loan from KK Ltd. A/c Dr. Rs 10,00,000
To Bank A/c Rs 10,00,000
In the consolidated financial statements, there will be no entry in this regard since loan and interest
income/expense will get set off.
Scenario (iii)
Generally, a loan which is repayable when funds are available, cannot be stated as loan repayable on
demand. Rather the entity needs to estimate the repayment date and determine its measurement accordingly
by applying the concept prescribed in Scenario
In the consolidated financial statements, there will be no entry in this regard since loan and interest
income/expense will get set off.
Scenario (iv)
In case the subsidiary YK Ltd. is planning to grant interest free loan to KK Ltd., then the difference between
the fair value of the loan on initial recognition and its nominal value should be treated as dividend
distribution by YK Ltd. and dividend income by the parent KK Ltd.
Journal entries
In books of parent In books of subsidiary
Bank a/c Dr. Financial Asset (Loan) a/c Dr.
To Financial Liability a/c (at Present Value) Dividend (P&L) a/c Dr.
To Dividend Income (P/L) To Bank a/c
QUESTION 75
([Link].1104 - Question Bank)
Sea Ltd. has lent a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs @ 18% pa for 10 years. The loan had a fair value of Rs. 12,23,960 at
the effective interest rate of 13%. To mitigate prepayment risks but at the same time retaining control over the
loan, Sea Ltd. transferred its right to receive the principal amount of the loan on its maturity with interest, after
retaining rights over 10% of principal and 4% interest that carries Fair Value of Rs. 29000, and 184620
respectively. The consideration for the transaction was Rs. 990000. The interest component retained included
a 2% fee towards collection of principal and interest that has a fair value of 65160. Defaults, if any are
deductible to a maximum extent of the company‟s claim on principal portion. You are required to show the
journal entries to the record the derecognition of Loan.
SOLUTION:
CA of Loan = 10,00,000
Fair Value of Loan @13% ERI = 12,23,960
In this case, 90% Principal & 14% Interest repayment have been transferred. Therefore, it is a case of
Partial Derecognition.
● Fair value of Entire FA = 12,23,960
● FV of principal retain = 29,000
● FV of Interest 4% retained = 1,84,620
1) Interest Comp = 1,19,460
2) Service Asset = 65,160
● FV of Strip Transferred (Bal. Fig.) = 10.10.340
Journal Entries
Principal Strip A/c Dr. 23,694
Interest Strip A/c Dr. 97601
Service Asset A/c Dr. 53,237
Strip Transferred A/c Dr. 8,25,468
To Loan A/c 10,00,000
Bank A/c Dr. 9,90,000
To Gain of Derecognition (P&L) 1,64,532
To Strip Transferred A/c 8,25,468
SOLUTION:
Based on the guidance above, the USD contract for purchase of machinery entered into by company A
includes an embedded foreign currency derivative due to the following reasons:
▪ The host contract is a purchase contract (non-financial in nature) that is not classified as, or measured
at FVTPL.
▪ The embedded foreign currency feature (requirement to settle the contract by payment of USD at a
future date) meets the definition of a stand-alone derivative – it is akin to a USD-₹ forward contract
maturing on 31 December 20X1.
▪ USD is not the functional currency of either of the substantial parties to the contract (i.e., neither
company A nor company B).
Accordingly, company A is required to separate the embedded foreign currency derivative from the
host purchase contract and recognise it separately as a derivative.
The separated embedded derivative is a forward contract entered into on 9 September 20X1, to exchange
USD 10,00,000 for ₹ at the USD/₹ forward rate of 67.8 on 31st December 20X1. Since the forward exchange
rate has been deemed to be the market rate on the date of the contract, the embedded forward contract has
a fair value of zero on initial recognition.
Subsequently, company A is required to measure this forward contract at its fair value, with changes in fair
value recognised in the statement of profit and loss. The following is the accounting treatment at quarter-
end and on settlement:
Accounting treatment:
Date Particulars Amount (₹) Amount (₹)
09-Sep-X1 On initial recognition of the forward contract
(No accounting entry recognised since initial fair value of Nil Nil
the forward contract is considered to be nil)
30-Sep-X1 Fair value change in forward contract
Derivative asset (company B) Dr. 3,00,000
31-Dec-X1 [(67.8-67.5) x10,00,000]
To Profit or loss 3,00,000
Fair value change in forward contract
31-Dec-X1 Forward contract asset (company B) Dr. 5,00,000
[{(67.8-67) x 10,00,000} - 3,00,000] 5,00,000
To Profit or loss
Recognition of machinery acquired and on settlement
Property, plant and equipment (at forward rate) Dr. 6,78,00,000
To Forward contract asset (company B) 8,00,000
To Creditor (company B) / Bank 6,70,00,000
D designates and documents the forward contract as the hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge of the
variability in cash flows arising from the repayment of the principal amount of the bond due to movements in
forward US dollar/sterling exchange rates.
D states in its hedge documentation that it will use the hypothetical derivative method to assess hedge
effectiveness. D identifies the hypothetical derivative as a forward contract under which it sells USD 15 million
and purchases GBP 9,835,389 at 31 December 20X3 (the repayment date of the bond). The hypothetical foreign
currency forward contract has a fair value of zero at 1 January 20X1. The spot and the forward exchange
rates and the fair value of the foreign currency forward contract are as follows:
Date Spot rate FWD rate FV of forward FWD points
1-Jan-20X1 0.6213 0.6557 - 0.0344 USD 15,000,000
31-Dec-20X1 0.5585 0.5858 (957,205) 0.0273 Forward points 516,000
31-Dec-20X2 0.5209 0.528 (1,833,346) 0.0071
31-Dec-20X3 0.5825 0.5825 (1,097,789) -
Pass necessary journal entries.
SOLUTION
The hedge remains effective for the entire period, with changes in the fair value of the forward
contract and the hedging instrument being perfectly offset. Because D has designated the variability in
cash flows arising from movements in the forward rates as the hedged risk, the entire change in the fair
value of the forward contract is recognised in OCI.
At each reporting date, G reclassifies from equity an amount equal to the movement in the spot rate on the
principal amount of the bond.
In addition, to ensure that the forward points recognised in OCI are reclassified fully to profit or loss over
the life of the hedge, D reclassifies from equity the forward points recognised in OCI amortised over the life
of the hedging relationship. Assuming that all criteria for hedge accounting have been met, D records the
following journal entries:
Particulars Dr Cr
Cash Dr. 93,19,500
To Bond 93,19,500
(Being bond liability recognized at spot rate)
31 December 20X1
Hedging Reserve (OCI) Dr. 9,57,205
To Derivative 9,57,205
(Being loss on hedging instrument i.e. forward contract (as per Ind AS
[Link](b), change in fair value of spot element – loss of 9,42,000
and as per Ind AS [Link], change in fair value of forward element –
loss of 15,205) recognized in OCI)
Bond Dr. 9,42,000
To Foreign currency (P&L) 9,42,000
(Being gain on restatement of hedged item i.e. foreign currency bond
recognized in P&L as per Ind AS 21)
Foreign currency (P&L) Dr. 9,42,000
To Hedging Reserve (OCI) 9,42,000
(Being cash flow hedge reserve associated with hedged item recognized
as per Ind AS [Link](a))
Foreign currency (P&L) Dr. 1,72,000
To Hedging Reserve (OCI) 1,72,000
(Being reclassification adjustment in respect of amortization of forward
element at the date of designation of the forward contract as hedging
instrument over the tenor of forward contract)
Interest expense Dr. 4,60,763
To Cash 4,60,763
(Being interest expense recognized (for sake of simplicity, the same is
recognized at closing spot rate whereas Ind AS 21.21-22 mandates use
of exchange rate on the date of transaction or an average rate over the
relevant period))
31 December 20X2
TOPIC - 15
IND AS 33 – EARNING PER SHARE
QUESTION 78
([Link].203 - Question Bank)
X Ltd.
1 January 1,000,000 shares in issue
28 February Issued 200,000 shares at fair value
31 August Bonus issue 1 share for 3shares held
30 November Issued 250,000 shares at fair value
Calculate the number of shares which would be used in the basic EPS calculation. Consider reporting date
as December end.
SOLUTION:
Period Calculations Weighted average number
of shares
1 January -28 February 1,000,000 × 2 / 12 × 4 / 3 222,222
1 March -31 August 1,200,000 × 6 / 12 × 4 / 3 800,000
1 September -30 November1,600,000 × 3 / 12 400,000
1 December -31 December 1,850,000 × 1 / 12 154,167
1,576,389
Non-cumulative dividends paid on equity-classified preference shares are not deducted in arriving at net
profit or loss for the period, but they are not returns to ordinary shareholders. Accordingly, these dividends
are deducted from net profit or loss for the period in arriving at the numerator.
(₹)
Net profit 46,00,000
Preference dividends (5,00,000 shares x 1.2) (6,00,000)
Related tax (₹ 6,00,000 x 30%) 1,80,000 (4,20,000)
Profit or loss attributable to P’s ordinary shareholders 41,80,000
Accordingly, the numerator for calculation of Basic EPS is ₹ 41,80,000
QUESTION 80
([Link].504 - Question Bank)
(This illustration does not illustrate the classification of the components of convertible financial instruments as
liabilities and equity or the classification of related interest and dividends as expenses and equity as required
by Ind AS32).
Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent entity Rs. 100,000
Ordinary shares outstanding 10,000
Non-convertible preference shares 6,000
Non-cumulative annual dividend on preference shares (before any dividend is paid Rs. 5.50 per
on ordinary shares) share
After ordinary shares have been paid a dividend of Rs. 2.10 per share, the preference shares
participate in any additional dividends on a 20:80 ratio with ordinary shares.
Compute the allocation of earnings for the purpose of calculation of Basic EPS when an entity has ordinary
shares & participating equity instruments that are not convertible into ordinary shares.
SOLUTION
Dividends on preference shares paid (6000 x Rs. 5.50 per share) Rs. 33,000
Dividends on ordinary shares paid (10,000 x Rs. 2.10 per share) Rs. 21,000
SOLUTION
Allocation of proceeds of the bond issue:
Liability component (Refer Note 1) Rs. 1,848,122
Equity component Rs. 151,878
Rs. 2,000,000
The liability and equity components would be determined in accordance with Ind AS 32. These amounts are
recognised as the initial carrying amounts of the liability and equity components. The amount assigned to
the issuer conversion option equity element is an addition to equity and is not adjusted.
Basic earnings per share Year 1:
Rs.1,000,000 = Rs. 0.83 per ordinary share
1,200,000
Diluted earnings per share Year 1:
It is presumed that the issuer will settle the contract by the issue of ordinary shares. The dilutive effect is
therefore calculated in accordance with the Standard.
Rs.1,000,000 + Rs.166,331 = Rs. 0.69 per ordinary share
1,200,000 + 500,000
Notes:
1) This represents the present value of the principal and interest discounted at 9% – Rs. 2,000,000
payable at the end of three years; Rs. 120,000 payable annually in arrears for three years.
2) Profit is adjusted for the accretion of Rs. 166,331 (Rs. 1,848,122 x 9%) of the liability because of the
passage of time. However, it is assumed that interest @ 6% for the year has already been adjusted.
3) 500,000 ordinary shares = 250 ordinary shares x 2,000 convertible bonds.
Since diluted earnings per share is increased when taking the convertible preference shares into account
(Rs. 2.939 to Rs. 3.344), the convertible preference shares are anti- dilutive and are ignored in the calculation
of diluted earnings per share for the year ended 31 March 2020. Therefore, diluted earnings per share for
the year ended 31 March 2020 is Rs. 2.939.
Working Note:
Calculation of incremental earnings per share and allocation of rank
Increase in Increase in Earnings per Rank
earnings number of incremental
(1) equity Share (3) = (1)
shares ÷ (2)
(2)
Rs. Rs.
Options
Increase in earnings Nil
No. of incremental shares issued for no
consideration [900 x (90-75)/90] 150 Nil 1
Convertible Preference Shares
Note: Grossing up of preference share dividend has been ignored here. At present dividend distribution tax
has been abolished. However, the question has been solved on the basis of the information given in the
question.
*Alternatively,
Increase in earnings for equity holders = saving due to non-payment to preference shareholders (net of tax)
= 9 x 7,500 = 67,500 - 8% = 62,100
Incremental no. of shares = 15,000
Parent:
Profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the ₹ 12,000 (excluding any earnings of, or dividends
parent entity paid by, the subsidiary)
Ordinary shares outstanding 10,000
Instruments of subsidiary owned by the parent 800 ordinary shares
Subsidiary:
Profit ₹ 5,400
Ordinary shares outstanding 1,000
Warrants 150, exercisable to purchase ordinary shares of the
subsidiary
Exercise price ₹ 10
Average market price of one ordinary share ₹ 20
Convertible preference shares 400, each convertible into one ordinary share
Dividends on preference shares ₹ 1 per share
No inter-company eliminations or adjustments were necessary except for dividends.
Ignore income taxes. Also, ignore classification of the components of convertible financial
instruments as liabilities and equity or the classification of related interest and dividends as expenses and equity as
required by Ind AS 32.
SOLUTION
Subsidiary’s earnings per share
Basic EPS ₹ 5.00 calculated: ₹ 5,400 (a) – ₹400 (b)
1,000 I
Notes:
(a) Subsidiary’s profit attributable to ordinary equity holders.
(b) Dividends paid by subsidiary on convertible preference shares.
(c) Subsidiary’s ordinary shares outstanding.
(d) Subsidiary’s profit attributable to ordinary equity holders (₹ 5,000) increased by ₹ 400 preference
dividends for the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share.
(e) Incremental shares from warrants, calculated: [(₹ 20 – ₹ 10) ÷ ₹ 20] × 150.
(f) Subsidiary’s ordinary shares assumed outstanding from conversion of convertible preference
shares, calculated: 400 convertible preference shares × conversion factor of 1.
(a) Parent’s profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent entity.
(b) Portion of subsidiary’s profit to be included in consolidated basic earnings per share, calculated:
(800 × ₹ 5.00) + (300 × Re 1.00).
(c) Parent’s ordinary shares outstanding.
(d) Parent’s proportionate interest in subsidiary’s earnings attributable to ordinary shares,
calculated: (800 ÷ 1,000) × (1,000 shares × ₹ 3.66 per share).
(e) Parent’s proportionate interest in subsidiary’s earnings attributable to warrants, calculated: (30
÷ 150) × (75 incremental shares × ₹ 3.66 per share).
(f) Parent’s proportionate interest in subsidiary’s earnings attributable to convertible preference
shares, calculated: (300 ÷ 400) × (400 shares from conversion × ₹ 3.66 per share).
TOPIC 16
IND AS 34 – INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORTING
SOLUTION:
If it is considered that there is no quarterly / seasonal variation, therefore normal expected production for
each quarter is 500 MT and fixed production overheads for the quarter are Rs. 2,500.
Fixed production overhead to be allocated per unit of production in every quarter will be Rs. 5 per MT
(Fixed overheads / Normal production).
Quarters Allocations
First ⮚ Actual fixed production overheads = Rs. 2,500
Quarter ⮚ Fixed production overheads based on the allocation rate of Rs. 5 per unit allocated to actual
production = Rs. 5 x 400 = Rs. 2,000
⮚ Unallocated fixed production overheads to be charged as expense as per Ind AS 2 and
consequently as per Ind AS 34 = Rs. 500
Second ⮚ Actual fixed production overheads on year-to-date basis = Rs. 5,000
Quarter ⮚ Fixed production overheads to be absorbed on year-to-date basis = 1,000 x Rs. 5 = Rs. 5,000
⮚ Earlier, Rs. 500 was not allocated to production in the 1st quarter. To give effect to the entire
Rs. 5,000 to be allocated in the second quarter, as per Ind AS 34, Rs. 500 are reversed by way
of a credit to the statement of profit and loss of the 2nd quarter.
Third ⮚ Actual production overheads on year-to-date basis = Rs. 7,500
Quarter ⮚ Fixed production overheads to be allocated on year-to-date basis = 1,500 x 5 = Rs. 7,500
⮚ There is no under or over recovery of allocated overheads. Hence, no further action is required.
Fourth ⮚ Actual fixed production overheads on year-to-date basis = Rs. 10,000
Quarter ⮚ Fixed production overheads to be allocated on year-to-date basis 1,900 x 5 = Rs. 9,500
⮚ Rs. 500, i.e., [Rs. 2,500 – (Rs. 5 x 400)] unallocated fixed production overheads in the 4th
quarter, are to be expensed off as per the principles of Ind AS 2 and Ind AS 34 by way of a
charge to the statement of profit and loss.
⮚ Unallocated productions overheads for the year Rs. 500 (i.e., Rs. 10,000 – Rs. 9,500) are
expensed in the Statement of profit and loss as per Ind AS 2.
The cumulative result of all the quarters would also result in unallocated overheads of Rs. 500, thus,
meeting the requirements of Ind AS 34 that the quarterly results should not affect the measurement of the
annual results.
QUESTION 85: (SIMILAR TO Nov 18, Dec21 EXAM & MTP April21, May’24 Exam)
([Link].05– Question Bank)
ABC Limited manufactures automobile parts. ABC Limited has shown a net profit of Rs. 20,00,000
for the third quarter of 20X1.
Following adjustments are made while computing the net profit:
i) Bad debts of Rs. 1,00,000 incurred during the quarter. 50% of the bad debts have been deferred to the next
quarter.
ii) Additional depreciation of Rs. 4,50,000 resulting from the change in the method of depreciation.
iii) Exceptional loss of Rs. 28,000 incurred during the third quarter. 50% of exceptional loss have been deferred
to next quarter.
iv) Rs. 5,00,000 expenditure on account of administrative expenses pertaining to the third quarter is deferred
on the argument that the fourth quarter will have more sales; therefore, fourth quarter should be debited by
higher expenditure. The expenditures are uniform throughout all quarters.
Ascertain the correct net profit to be shown in the Interim Financial Report of third quarter to be
presented to the Board of Directors.
SOLUTION:
In the instant case, the quarterly net profit has not been correctly stated. As per Ind AS 34, Interim
Financial Reporting, the quarterly net profit should be adjusted and restated as follows:
i) The treatment of bad debts is not correct as the expenses incurred during an interim reporting period
should be recognised in the same period. Accordingly, Rs. 50,000 should be deducted from Rs.
20,00,000.
ii) Recognising additional depreciation of Rs. 4,50,000 in the same quarter is correct and is in tune with
Ind AS 34.
iii) Treatment of exceptional loss is not as per the principles of Ind AS 34, as the entire amount of Rs.
28,000 incurred during the third quarter should be recognized in the same quarter. Hence Rs. 14,000
which was deferred should be deducted from the profits of third quarter only.
iv) As per Ind AS 34 the income and expense should be recognised when they are earned and incurred
respectively. As per para 39 of Ind AS 34, the costs should be anticipated or deferred only when:
1) It is appropriate to anticipate or defer that type of cost at the end of the financial year, and
2) Costs are incurred unevenly during the financial year of an enterprise.
Therefore, the treatment done relating to deferment of Rs. 5,00,000 is not correct as expenditures are
uniform throughout all quarters.
Thus, considering the above, the correct net profits to be shown in Interim Financial Report of the third
quarter shall be Rs. 14,36,000 (Rs. 20,00,000 -Rs. 50,000 - Rs. 14,000 - Rs. 5,00,000).
TOPIC 17
IND AS 36 – IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
SOLUTION
Ignoring depreciation, the loss that would be reported in the Profit & Loss as a result of the impairment is
as follows:
£
*Carrying value at balance sheet date-US 16,20,000 @ £ 1.8 = 9,00,000
Historical cost- US 18,00,000 @ £ 1.6 = 11,25,000
Impairment loss recognised in profit and loss (2,25,000)
The components of the impairment loss can be analysed as follows:
Change in value due to impairment = US 1,80,000# @ £ 1.8 = (1,00,000)
Exchange component of change =
US 18,00,000 @ 1.8 – US 18,00,000 @ £ 1.6 (1,25,000)
* Recoverable Amount being less than cost becomes the Carrying Value.
# 18,00,000-16,20,000 = 1,80,000
QUESTION 87:
([Link].302– Question Bank)
SUN ltd is an entity with various subsidiaries. The entity closes its books of account at every
year ended on 31st March. On 1st July 20X1 Sun ltd acquired an 80% interest in Pluto ltd.
Details of the acquisition were as follows:
– Sun ltd acquired 800,000 shares in Pluto ltd by issuing two equity shares for every five
acquired. The fair value of Sun Ltd’s share on 1st July 20X1 was Rs 4 per share and the fair value of a Pluto’s
share was Rs. 1·40 per share. The costs of issue were 5% per share.
– Sun ltd incurred further legal and professional costs of Rs. 100,000 that directly related to the acquisition.
– The fair values of the identifiable net assets of Pluto Ltd at 1st July 20X1 were measured at Rs. 1·3 million.
Sun ltd initially measured the non-controlling interest in Pluto ltd at fair value. They used the market value of
a Pluto ltd share for this purpose. No impairment of goodwill arising on the acquisition of Pluto ltd was required
at 31st March 20X2 or 20X3.
Pluto ltd comprises three cash generating units A, B and C. When Pluto ltd was acquired the directors of Sun
ltd estimated that the goodwill arising on acquisition could reasonably be allocated to units [Link] on a [Link]
basis. The carrying values of the assets in these cash generating units and their recoverable amounts are as
follows:
A 600 740
B 550 650
C 450 400
Required:
(i) Compute the carrying value of the goodwill arising on acquisition of Pluto Ltd in the consolidated Balance
Sheet of Sun ltd at 31st March 20X4 following the impairment review.
(ii) Compute the total impairment loss arising as a result of the impairment review, identifying how much of
this loss would be allocated to the non-controlling interests in Pluto ltd.
SOLUTION
1. Computation of goodwill on acquisition
Particular Amount (Rs 000)
Cost of investment (8,00,000 x 2/5 x Rs. 4) 1,280
Fair value of non-controlling interest (2,00,000 x Rs. 1·4) 280
Fair value of identifiable net assets at date of acquisition (1,300)
So goodwill equals 260
Acquisition costs are not included as part of the fair value of the consideration given under Ind AS 103,
Business Combination.
Rs 21·2 (20%) of the above is allocated to the NCI with the balance allocated to the shareholders of Sun ltd.
On 31st March, 2018, the professional valuers have estimated that the current market value of Machinery A
is ₹ 7 lakhs. The valuation fee was ₹ 1 lakh. There is a need to dismantle the machinery before delivering it to
the buyer. Dismantling cost is ₹ 1.50 lakhs. Specialised packaging cost would be ₹ 25 thousand and legal fees
would be ₹ 75 thousand.
The Inventory has been valued in accordance with Ind AS 2. The recoverable value of CGU is ₹ 10 Lakh as on
31st March, 2018. In the next year, the company has done the assessment of recoverability of the CGU and
found that the value of such CGU is ₹ 11 Lakhs i.e. on 31st March, 2019. The Recoverable value of Machine A
is ₹ 4,50,000 and combined Machine A and B is ₹ 7,60,000 as on 31st March, 2019.
Required:
a) Compute the impairment loss on CGU and carrying value of each asset after charging impairment loss for
the year ending 31st March, 2018 by providing all the relevant working notes to arrive at such calculation.
b) Compute the prospective depreciation for the year 2018-2019 on the above assets.
c) Compute the carrying value of CGU as at 31st March, 2019.
SOLUTION
(a) Computation of impairment loss and carrying value of each of the asset in CGU after impairment loss
* Balancing figure.
QUESTION 89:
([Link].304– Question Bank)
Parent acquires an 80% ownership interest in Subsidiary for Rs 2,100 on April 1, 20X1. At that
date, Subsidiary’s net identifiable assets have a fair value of Rs 1,500. Parent chooses to
measure the non-controlling interests as the proportionate interest of Subsidiary’s net
identifiable assets. The assets of Subsidiary together are the smallest group of assets that
generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or
groups of assets. Because other cash-generating units of Parent are expected to benefit from the synergies of
the combination, the goodwill of Rs 500 related to those synergies has been allocated to other cash-generating
units within Parent. On March 31, 20X2, Parent determines that the recoverable amount of cash-generating
unit Subsidiary is ₹ 1,000. The carrying amount of the net assets of Subsidiary, excluding goodwill, is Rs
1,350. Allocate the impairment loss on March 31, 20X2.
SOLUTION:
Non-controlling interests is measured as the proportionate interest of Subsidiary’s net identifiable assets,
i.e., Rs 300 (20% of Rs 1,500). Goodwill is the difference between the aggregate of the consideration
transferred and the amount of the non-controlling interests (Rs 2,100 + Rs 300) and the net identifiable
assets (Rs 1,500), i.e., Rs 900.
Since, the assets of Subsidiary together are the smallest group of assets that generate cash inflows that
are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets; therefore, Subsidiary is
a cash-generating unit. Because other cash-generating units of Parent are expected to benefit from the
synergies of the combination, the goodwill of Rs 500 related to those synergies has been allocated to other
cash-generating units within Parent. Because the cash-generating unit comprising Subsidiary includes
goodwill within its carrying amount, it should be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if
there is an indication that it may be impaired.
Therefore, Rs 500 of the Rs 850 impairment loss for the unit is allocated to the goodwill. If the partially-
owned subsidiary is itself a cash-generating unit, the goodwill impairment loss should be allocated to the
controlling and non-controlling interests on the same basis as that on which profit or loss is allocated. In
this case, profit or loss is allocated on the basis of relative ownership interests. Because the goodwill is
recognised only to the extent of Parent’s 80% ownership interest in Subsidiary, Parent recognises only 80%
of that goodwill impairment loss (i.e., Rs 400).
The remaining impairment loss of Rs 350 is recognised by reducing the carrying amounts of Subsidiary’s
identifiable assets.
Allocation of the impairment loss for Subsidiary on March 31, 20X2 Allocation of the impairment
loss for Subsidiary on March 31, 20X2
On March 31, 20X2 Goodwill of Net identifiable Total (Rs)
subsidiary (Rs) assets (Rs)
Carrying amount 400 1,350 1,750
V'Smart Academy Page | 111
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
SOLUTION
The goodwill on consolidation of Mission Ltd that is recognized in the consolidated balance sheet of Vision
Ltd is Rs. 30 million (Rs.190 million – 80% x Rs.200 million). This can only be reviewed for impairment as
part of the cash generating units to which it relates. Since here the goodwill cannot be meaningfully
allocated to the units, the impairment review is done in two parts.
Units A and C have values in use that are more than their carrying values. However, the value in use of Unit
B is less than its carrying amount. This means that the assets of unit B are impaired by Rs. 24 million (Rs.
90 million – Rs.66 million). This impairment loss will be charged to the statement of profit and loss.
Assets of Unit B will be written down on a pro-rata basis as shown in the table:
(Rs. in million)
Asset Impact on carrying value
Existing Impairment Revised
Intangible assets 10 (4)# 6
Property, plant and Equipment 50 (20)## 30
Current assets 30 Nil* 30
Total 90 (24) 66
* The current assets are not impaired because they are expected to realize at least their carrying value when
disposed of.
# 24*10/60 = 4
## 24*50/60 = 20
Following this review, the three units plus the goodwill are reviewed together i.e. treating Mission Limited
as a single cash generating Unit. The impact of this is shown in the following table, given that the recoverable
V'Smart Academy Page | 112
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
In 20X2, the net cash flows without restructuring (RS. 8,70,000) exceed the net cash flows with
restructuring (RS. 5,20,000) by the amount of the restructuring costs (RS. 3,50,000).
The future cash flows (which exclude inflation) have been discounted at a rate of 4%. For simplicity, it has
been assumed that the cash flows arise at the end of each year.
Compute Impairment Loss at 31st March, 20X1 when-
(i) Restructuring costs is recognised in the financial statements at 31st March, 20X1
(ii) Restructuring costs is not recognised in the financial statements at 31st March, 20X1
Answer
Computation of present value of cash flows under both the following conditions:
(Amount in RS.)
Year Discount factor With restructuring With restructuring
consideration consideration
Future net cash Present value Future net cash Present value
flows flows
(a) (b) (c)=(a)x(b) (d) (e)=(a)x(d)
20X1-20X2 0.962 5,20,000 5,00,000 8,70,000 8,36,000
V'Smart Academy Page | 113
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
The impairment calculations at 31st March, 20X1 differ according to whether or not provision for the
restructuring costs is recognised in the financial statements. This will depend on whether the requirements
of Ind AS 37 have been met for recognition.
TOPIC 18
IND AS 37: PROVISIONS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND
CONTINGENT ASSETS
QUESTION 92: (RTP May22)
([Link].214– Question Bank)
XYZ Ltd. offers a six-month warranty on its small to medium sized equipment, which can be put to use by the
customer with no installation support. The warranty comes with the equipment and the customer cannot
purchase it separately. This equipment is typically sold at a gross margin of 40%. XYZ Ltd. has made a
provision of Rs. 30,000 during the year ended 31st March, 20X2, which is approximately 1% of its gross margin
on the sale of these equipment. Based on past experience, it is expected that 1% of equipment sold have been
returned as faulty within the warranty period. Faulty equipment returned to XYZ Ltd. during the warranty
period are scrapped and the sale value is fully refunded to the customer.
Assuming that sales occurred evenly during the year, how should XYZ Ltd. evaluate whether any
additional warranty provision is required on equipment sold in the past as at 31st March, 20X2?
Had the warranty period been 2 years instead of six months, what additional criteria would XYZ
Ltd. need to consider?
SOLUTION
Calculation of additional warranty provisions:
Warranty claim covers 1% of gross margin, whereas customers are refunded the full selling price. As the
goods are scrapped it is assumed XYZ Ltd has no potential for re- imbursement from its supplier regarding
the faulty goods.
A calculation of warranty provision is set out below:
1% of annual gross margin is Rs. 30,000 therefore 100% of annual gross margin must be Rs. 30,00,000.
Since gross margin is 40%, sales should be Rs. 75,00,000. As provide in the question that the sales are
evenly spread during the year and given the six month warranty, half of the sales occurred in the second
half of the year is still covered within the warranty period as follows.
% Annual Product under Percentage Warranty
age sales warranty at 31st expected to provision
March, 20X2 be returned
Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs.
Gross 40% 30,00,000
margin
Selling 100% 75,00,000 37,50,000 1% 37,500
price
The warranty provision should therefore be increased by Rs. 7,500 (Rs. 37,500 – Rs. 30,000). As the
provision is expected to be used in the next 6 months no discounting is required.
If the warranty period is 2 years:
Since the outstanding period of warranties is 6 months (i.e. less than a year), no discounting is required.
However, if a longer warranty period is to be given, the entity will have to take into account the effect of the
time value of money. The amount of provision shall be the present value of the expenditures expected to
be required to settle the warranty obligation. (Refer Para 45 of Ind AS 37)
The discount rate shall be a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the liability. The discount rate shall not reflect risks for which future cash
flow estimates have been adjusted. (Refer Para 47 of Ind AS 37)
% Annual Product under Percentage Warranty
age sales warranty at expected to provision
31st March, be returned
20X2
Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs.
Gross 40% 30,00,000
margin
Selling 100% 75,00,000 75,00,000 1% 75,000
V'Smart Academy Page | 115
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
price
The warranty provision should therefore be increased by Rs. 45,000 (Rs. 75,000 – Rs. 30,000).
Further discounting of provision would be required.
SOLUTION
As per para 68 of Ind AS 37, onerous contract is a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the
obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it. The
unavoidable cost under a contract reflects the least net cost of exiting from the contract, which is the lower
of the cost of fulfilling it and any compensation for penalties arising from failure to fulfilling it.
Ind AS 37 provides that the amount recognised shall be the best estimate of the expenditure required to
settle the present obligation, which is the amount that an entity would rationally pay to settle the obligation
at the end of the reporting period or to transfer it to a third party at that time. In case of onerous contracts,
an amount that an entity would rationally pay to settle the obligation would be the lower of the
compensation or penalties arising from failure to fulfil the contacts and excess of unavoidable cost of
meeting the obligations under the contract from the economic benefits expected to be received under it.
As per para 68 of Ind AS 37, the cost of fulfilling a contract comprises the costs that relate directly to the
contract. Costs that relate directly to a contract consist of both -
(a) The incremental costs of fulfilling that contract—for example, direct labour and materials; and
(b) An allocation of other costs that relate directly to fulfilling contracts— for example, an allocation of the
depreciation charge for an item of property, plant and equipment used in fulfilling that contract among
others.
The unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract are only costs that:
● "Are directly variable with the contract and therefore incremental to the performance of the contract;"
V'Smart Academy Page | 116
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
● Do not include allocated or shared costs that will be incurred regardless of whether the entity fulfils
the contract or not; and
● Cannot be avoided by the entity's future actions.
Accordingly, HVCL has correctly measured the cost for creation of provision for onerous contracts
by considering material cost, labour cost (to the extent it relates directly to production) and material
overheads (to the extent it relates directly to production).
Further, HVCL is correct that the period cost will not be considered for measurement of cost for the
purpose of creation of provision on onerous contracts as they do not relate directly to fulfilling the
contracts.
Answers
As per Ind AS 37 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets’, closure of a division is a
restructuring exercise. Ind AS 37 states that a constructive obligation to proceed with the restructuring
arises when at the reporting date the entity has:
– Commenced activities connected with the restructuring; or
– Made a public announcement of the main features of the restructuring to those affected by it. In this
case a public announcement has been made and so a provision will be necessary at 31st March, 20X2.
This will result in the following charges to the Statement of Profit and Loss:
(i) Estimate of redundancy costs of Rs. 1.9 million is the best estimate of the expenditure at the date the
financial statements are authorized for issue. Changes in estimates after the reporting date are taken
into account for this purpose as an adjusting event after the reporting date. No charge is necessary
for the retraining costs as these are not incurred in 20X1-20X2 and cannot form part of a restructuring
provision as they are related to the ongoing activities of the entity.
(ii) Impairment of plant and equipment of Rs. 6.5 million is although not strictly part of the restructuring
provision the decision to restructure before the year-end means that related assets need to be reviewed
for impairment. In this case the recoverable amount of the plant and equipment is only Rs. 1.5 million.
As per Ind AS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’, property, plant and equipment should be written down to
this amount, resulting in a charge of Rs. 6.5 million to the income statement.
(iii) For compensation for breach of contract of Rs. 0.55 million, same principle applies here as applied to
the redundancy costs.
(iv) No charge is recognized in 20X1-20X2 with respect to future operating losses of 20X2-20X3. Future
operating losses relate to future events and provisions are made only for the consequences of past
events.
(v) Ind AS 37 states that an onerous contract is one for which the expected cost of fulfilling the contract
exceeds the benefits expected from the contract. Provision is made for the lower of the expected net
cost of fulfilling the contract and the cost of early termination (not available in this case).
The net cost of fulfilling the contract is Rs. 4.51 million [Rs. 1.5 million x 4.32 – Rs. 0.3 million x 0.95
– Rs. 0.5 million x (4.32 – 0.95)].
TOPIC 19
IND AS 38 -INTANGIBLE ASSETS
QUESTION 95: (MTP May’24)
([Link].107– Question Bank)
X Pharmaceutical Ltd. seeks your opinion in respect of following accounting transactions:
1. Acquired a 4 year license to manufacture a specialized drug at a cost of Rs. 1,00,00,000
at the start of the year. Production commenced immediately.
2. Also purchased another company at the start of year. As part of that acquisition the
company acquired a brand with a FV of Rs. 3,00,00,000 based on sales revenue. The life of the brand is
estimated at 15 years.
3. Spent Rs. 1,00,00,000 on an advertising campaign during the first six months. Subsequent sales have
shown a significant improvement and it is expected this will continue for 3 years.
4. It has commenced developing a new drug ‘Drug-A’. The project cost would be Rs. 10,00,00,000. Clinical
trial proved successful and such drug is expected to generate revenue over the next 5 years.
Cost incurred (accumulated) till March 31, 20X1 is Rs. 5,00,00,000.
Balance cost incurred during the financial year 20X1-20X2 is Rs. 5,00,00,000.
5. It has also commenced developing another drug ‘Drug B’. It has incurred Rs. 50,00,000 towards research
expenses till March 31, 20X2. The technological feasibility has not yet been established.
How the above transactions will be accounted for in the books of account of X Pharmaceutical Ltd?
SOLUTION
X Pharmaceutical Ltd. is advised as under:
1. It should recognise the drug license as an intangible asset, because it is a separate external purchase,
separately identifiable asset and considered successful in respect of feasibility and probable future cash
inflows.
The drug license should be recorded at Rs. 1,00,00,000.
2. It should recognise the brand as an intangible asset because it is purchased as part of acquisition and
it is separately identifiable. The brand should be amortised over a period of 15 years.
The brand will be recorded at Rs. 3,00,00,000.
3. The advertisement expenses of Rs. 1,00,00,000 should be expensed off.
4. The development cost incurred during the financial year 20X1-20X2 should be capitalised.
Cost of intangible asset (Drug A) as on March 31, 20X2
Opening cost Rs. 5,00,00,000
Development cost Rs. 5,00,00,000
Total cost Rs. 10,00,00,000
5. Research expenses of Rs. 50,00,000 incurred for developing ‘Drug B’ should be expensed off since
technological feasibility has not yet established.
QUESTION 96: (Jan21 EXAMS) & (MTP Nov22 & RTP NOV’24)
([Link].209– Question Bank)
Super Sounds Limited had the following transactions during the Financial Year 2019-2020.
(i) On 1st April 2019, Super Sound Limited purchased the net assets of Music Limited for Rs.
13,20,000. The fair value of Music Limited’s identifiable net assets was Rs. 10,00,000. Super Sound
Limited is of the view that due to the popularity of Music Limited’s product, the life of goodwill is 10 years.
(ii) On 4th May 2019, Super Sounds Limited purchased a Franchisee to organize musical shows from Armaan
TV for Rs. 80,00,000 and at an annual fee of 2% of musical shows revenue. The Franchisee expires after
5 years. Musical shows revenue was Rs.10,00,000 for financial year 2019-2020. The projected future
revenues for financial year 2020-2021 is Rs. 25,00,000 and Rs. 30,00,000 p.a. for the remaining 3 years
thereafter.
(iii) On 4th July 2019, Super Sounds Limited was granted a Copyright that had been applied for by Music
Limited. During the financial year 2019-2020, Super Sound Limited incurred Rs. 2,50,000 on legal cost to
register the Patent and Rs. 7,00,000 additional cost to successfully prosecute a copyright infringement
suit against a competitor.
The life of the copyright is for 10 years.
Super Sound Limited follows an accounting policy to amortize all intangible on SLM (Straight Line Method) basis
or any appropriate basis over a maximum period permitted by relevant Ind AS, taking a full year amortization
in the year of acquisition.
You are required to prepare:
(i) A Schedule showing the intangible section in Super Sound Limited Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2020,
and
(ii) A Schedule showing the related expenses that would appear in the Statement of Profit and Loss of Super
Sound Limited for the year ended 2019-2020.
SOLUTION
i)
Super Sounds Limited
Balance Sheet (Extract relating to intangible asset) as at 31st March 2020
Note No. Rs.
Assets
(1) Non- current asset
Intangible assets 1 69,45,000
*As per Ind AS 36, irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment, an entity shall test goodwill
acquired in a business combination for impairment annually. This implies that goodwill is not amortised
annually but is subject to annual impairment, if any.
**As per the information in the question, the limiting factor in the contract for the use is time i.e., 5 years
and not the fixed total amount of revenue to be generated. Therefore, an amortisation method that is based
on the revenue generated by an activity that includes the use of an intangible asset is inappropriate and
amortisation based on time can only be applied.
2. Amortization expenses
Franchise (W.N.2) 16,00,000
. Copyright (W.N.3) 25,000 16,25,000
Other expenses
Legal cost on copyright 7,00,000
Fee for Franchise (10,00,000 x 2%) 20,000 7,20,000
Working Notes:
P Particulars Rs.
(1) Goodwill on acquisition of business
Cash paid for acquiring the business 13,20,000
Less: Fair value of net assets acquired (10,00,000)
Goodwill 3,20,000
Note 1: The software was developed in nine months ended 31st December, 20X1 and was capable of
operating in the manner intended by the entity. It was brought into use on 31st March, 20X2. The
employment costs are for the period of twelve months (i.e. up to 31 st March, 20X2). The employees were
engaged in developing the software and related activities.
Note 2: Other costs directly related to development include an abnormal cost of Rs. 50,000 in respect of
repairing the damage which resulted from a security breach.
What will be the amount of the software development costs that can be capitalized by explaining the reason
for each element of cost?
Solution
In the given fact pattern, the entity should apply the recognition and measurement principles relevant for
an internally generated intangible asset. The entity has to ensure compliance with additional
requirements relating to internally generated intangible assets in addition to general recognition criteria
and initial measurement of intangible asset. In the instant case, for the measurement of software
development cost, entity must evaluate the costs incurred for recognition of an intangible asset arising
from development phase with reference to paragraphs 65 to 67 of Ind AS 38.
V'Smart Academy Page | 121
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
According to the said paragraphs, the initial carrying amount of the software will be computed as follows:
Particulars Amount Amount to be Remarks
(Rs. capitalised as
in Intangible Assets
thousands) (Rs. in thousands)
Purchase price of 600 600 The cost of materials or / and
imported software services used or consumed in
generating the intangible asset
and any directly attributable
cost of preparing the asset for
its intended use.
Accordingly, the initial carrying value of the software is Rs. 39,20,000. The remaining costs
will be charged to profit or loss.
SOLUTION:
Ind AS 38 'Intangible Assets' requires an intangible asset to be recognised if, and only if, certain criteria
are met. Regulatory approval on 1 June 20X5 was the last criterion to be met, the other criteria have been
met as follows:
• Intention to complete the asset is apparent as it is a major project with full support from board
• Finance is available as resources are focused on project
• Costs can be reliably measured
• Benefits are expected to exceed costs – (in 2 years)
Amount of Rs. 15,00,000 (Rs. 18,00,000 x 10/12) should be capitalised in the Balance sheet of year ending
20X5-20X6 representing expenditure since 1 June 20X5.
The expenditure incurred prior to 1 June 20X5 which is Rs. 3,00,000 (2/12 x Rs. 18,00,000) should be
recognised as an expense, retrospective recognition of expense as an asset is not allowed.
Ind AS 36 'Impairment of assets' requires an intangible asset not yet available for use to be tested for
impairment annually.
Cash flow of Rs. 12,00,000 in perpetuity would clearly have a present value in excess of Rs. 12,00,000 and
hence there would be no impairment. However, the research director is technically qualified, so impairment
tests should be based on her estimate of a four-year remaining life and so present value of the future cost
savings of Rs. 9,60,000 should be considered in that case.
Rs. 9,60,000 is greater than the offer received (fair value less costs to sell) of Rs. 7,80,000 and so Rs.
9,60,000 should be used as the recoverable amount.
So, the carrying amount should be consequently reduced to Rs. 9,60,000.
Impairment loss of Rs. 5,40,000 is to be recognised in the profit and loss for the year
20X5-20X6.
TOPIC 20
IND AS 40 - INVESTMENT PROPERTY
QUESTION 99: (SIMILAR TO RTP May21 & EXAM MAY22 & MTP May23 )
([Link].401– Question Bank)
X Ltd owned a land property whose future use was not determined as at 31 March 20X1.
How should the property be classified in the books of X Ltd as at 31 March 20X1?
During June 20X1, X Ltd commenced construction of office building on it for own use.
Presuming that the construction of the office building will still be in progress as at 31 March 20X2
(a) How should the land property be classified by X Ltd in its financial statements as at 31 March 20X2?
(b) Will there be a change in the carrying amount of the property resulting from any change in use of the
investment property?
(c) Whether the change in classification to, or from, investment properties is a change in accounting policy to
be accounted for in accordance with Ind AS 8, Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and
Errors?
(d) Would your answer to (a) above be different if there were to be a management intention to commence
construction of an office building for own use; however, no construction activity was planned by 31 March
20X2?
SOLUTION:
As per paragraph 8(b) of Ind AS 40, any land held for currently undetermined future use, should be
classified as an investment property. Hence, in this case, the land would be regarded as held for capital
appreciation. Hence the land property should be classified by X Ltd as investment property in the financial
statements as at 31 March 20X1.
As per Para 57 of the Standard, an entity can change the classification of any property to, and from, an
investment property when and only when evidenced by a change in use. A change occurs when the property
meets or ceases to meet the definition of investment property and there is evidence of the change in use.
Mere management's intention for use of the property does not provide evidence of a change in use.
(a) Since X Ltd has commenced construction of office building on it for own use, the property should be
reclassified from investment property to owner occupied as at 31 March 20X2.
(b) As per Para 59, transfers between investment property, owner occupied and inventories do not
change the carrying amount of the property transferred and they do not change the cost of the
property for measurement or disclosure purposes.
(c) No. The change in classification to, or from, investment properties is due to change in use of the
property. No retrospective application is required and prior period's financial statements need not be
re-stated.
(d) Mere management intentions for use of the property do not evidence change in use. Since X Ltd has
no plans to commence construction of the office building during 20X1-20X2, the property should
continue to be classified as an investment property by X Ltd. in its financial statements as at 31
March 20X2.
Note: The answer to the above is as per ICAI Module. However, Different opinion exist and the
property can be reclassified as PPE.
Floor 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th
Use Waiting Area Admin HR Accounts Inspection MD Office Canteen Vacant
Since UK Ltd. did not need the floors 8, 9 and 10 for its business needs, it has leased out the same to a
restaurant on a long-term lease basis. The terms of the lease agreement are as follows:
V'Smart Academy Page | 124
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
SOLUTION
(a) Ind AS 16 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ states that property, plant and equipment are tangible items
that are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others, or for
administrative purposes.
(b) As per Ind AS 40‘Investment property’, investment property is a property held to earn rentals or for
capital appreciation or both, rather than for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for
administrative purposes or sale in the ordinary course of business.
(c) Further, as per Ind AS 40, the building owned by the entity and leased out under one or more operating
leases will be classified as investment property. Here the top three floors have been leased out for 5
years with a non-cancellable period of 3 years. The useful life of the building is 50 years. The lease
period is far less than the useful life of the building leased out. Further, the lease rentals of three years
altogether do not recover the fair value of the floors leased i.e. 15 crore x 30% = 4.50 crore. Hence the
lease is an operating lease. Therefore, the 3 floors leased out as operating lease will be classified as
investment property in the books of lessor i.e. UK Ltd.
(d) However, for investment property, Ind AS 40 states that an entity shall adopt as its accounting policy
the cost model to all of its investment property. Ind AS 40 also requires that an entity shall disclose the
fair value of such investment property (ies).
(In crore)
PPE (70%) Investment Total
property (30%)
Land (25%) Building (75%)
Cost 1.75 5.25 3 10
FV 2.625 7.875 4.5 15
Valuation model followed Cost Cost Cost
Value recognized in the books 1.75 5.25 3
Less: Depreciation Nil (5.25/50) = (3/50) = 0.06
0.105 crore
Carrying value as on 31st March, 1.75 5.145 2.94
2018
Impairment loss No impairment loss since fair value is more than the cost
Property Details
A Ltd.’s office building A Ltd.’s registered office in Delhi, is a 15 storey building, of which only 3 floors
(registered office) are occupied by A Ltd., whereas remaining floors are given on rent to other
companies. These agreements are usually for a period of 3 years. According
to A Ltd., such excess office space will continue to be let out on lease to
external parties and have no plans to occupy it, at least in near future.
Flats in Township As regards township in Location 1, there are approximately 2,000 flats in the
located in location 1 said township. It was built primarily for A Ltd.’s employees, hence,
approximately 80% of the flats are allotted to employees and remaining flats
are either kept vacant or given on rent to other external parties. A lease
agreement is signed between A Ltd. and an individual party for every 12
months being 1st April to 31st March. The lease entered is a cancellable lease
(cancellable at the option of any of the parties). Also, besides monthly rent,
additional charges are levied by A Ltd. on account of electricity, water, cable
connection, etc.
According to A Ltd., there is no intention of selling such excess flats or
allotting it to its employees.
Flats in township There are 1,000 flats in location 2 township, of which:
located in location 2 • 400 flats are given to employees for their own accommodation.
• 350 flats are given on rent to Central Government and State
Government for accommodation of their employees. Average lease
period being 12 months with cancellable clause in lease agreements.
• 250 flats are kept vacant.
Hostel located in 60 rooms in the hostel have been let out to G Ltd., to give accommodation to
location 1 their personnel. Lease agreement is prepared for every 11 months and
renewed thereafter. Besides the monthly rent amount, some charges are
levied towards water, electricity and other amenities, e.g., cable connection,
etc.
Land in location 1 In 20X4, A Ltd. purchased a plot of land on the outskirts of a major city. The
area has mainly low-cost public housing and very limited public transport
facilities. The government has plans to develop the area as an industrial park
in 5 years’ time and the land is expected to greatly appreciate in value if the
government proceeds with the plan. A Ltd. has not decided what to do with
the property.
Land in location 1 A portion of land has been leased out to C Ltd. for its manufacturing
operations. Land has been given on lease on a lease rental of Rs. 10 lacs p.a.
with a lease term of 25 years.
Land in location 2 A portion of the land has been given on rent to D Ltd. which has constructed
a petrol pump on such land. It has been leased for a period of 40 years and
renewed for a further period of 40 years.
Determine the classification of properties which are not held for operational
purposes, with suitable reasoning in the financial statements of A Ltd.
Answers
Property Classification of properties not held for operational purpose
A Ltd.’s office building Excess portion of office space has been given on lease to earn rental
(registered office) income. Out of 15 storey building, only 3 floors are occupied by A Ltd.
Such excess office space was constructed for the purpose of letting
it out. According to A Ltd., such excess office space will continue to
be let out on lease to external parties and have no plans to occupy it,
at least in near future. Further, office space given on rent, although in
same building, is separately identifiable from another owner-occupied
portion and hence can be sold separately (if required). Hence, the
excess space will qualify to be an investment property.
Flats in Township Excess flats have been given on lease to earn rental income. According
located in location 1 to A Ltd., there is no intention of selling such excess flats or allotting it
to its employees. Further, flats given on rent, can be sold separately
from flats occupied by A Ltd.’s employees as they are separately
identifiable. A Ltd. also charges its lessees on account of ancillary
services, i.e., water, electricity, cable connection, etc., but the monthly
V'Smart Academy Page | 126
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
TOPIC 21
IND AS 41 - AGRICULTURE
QUESTION 102: (Similar to Exam May’23)
([Link].205– Question Bank)
XY Ltd. is a farming entity where cows are milked on a daily basis. Milk is kept in cold
storage immediately after milking and sold to retail distributors on a weekly basis. On 1
April 20X1, XY Ltd. ad a herd of 500 cows which were all three years old.
During the year, some of the cows became sick and on 30 September 20X1, 20 cows died.
On 1 October 20X1, XY Ltd. purchased 20 replacement cows at the market for ₹ 21,000 each. These 20
cows were all one year old when they were purchased.
On 31 March 20X2, XY Ltd. had 1,000 litres of milk in cold storage which had not been sold to retail
distributors. The market price of milk at 31 March 20X2 was ₹ 20 per litre. When selling the milk to
distributors, XY Ltd. incurs selling costs of ₹ 1 per litre. These amounts did not change during March 20X2
and are not expected to change during April 20X2.
Information relating to fair value and costs to sell is given below:
Date Fair value of a dairy cow (aged) Costs to sell a cow
1 Year 1.5 Years 3 Years 4 Years
1st April 20X1 20,000 22,000 27,000 25,000 1,000
1st October 20X1 21,000 23,000 28,000 26,000 1,000
31st March 20X2 21,500 23,500 29,000 26,500 1,100
You can assume that fair value of a 3.5 years old cow on 1st October 20X1 is ₹ 27,000.
Pass necessary journal entries of above transactions with respect to cows in the financial statements of XY
Ltd. for the year ended 31st March, 20X2? Also show the amount lying in inventory if any.
SOLUTION:
Journal Entries on 1st October, 20X1
(All figures in ₹)
Loss (on death of 20 cows) (Refer W.N.) Dr. 5,20,000
To Biological asset 5,20,000
(Loss booked on death of 20 cows)
Biological Asset (purchase of 20 new cows) (Refer W.N.) Dr. 4,00,000
To Bank 4,00,000
(Initial recognition of 20 new purchased cows at fair value less costs to sell)
Journal Entries on 31st March, 20X2
Loss on remeasurement of old cows Dr. 2,88,000
To Biological asset [(1,30,00,000 – 5,20,000) – 1,21,92,000] 2,88,000
(Subsequent measurement of cows at fair value less costs to sell)
Biological Asset (4,48,000 – 4,00,000) Dr. 48,000
To Gain on remeasurement of new cows 48,000
(Subsequent measurement of cows at fair value less costs to sell)
Inventory (Milk) as at 31st March, 20X2 = ₹ 19,000 (1,000 x (20 – 1))
Working Note:
Calculation of Biological asset at various dates
Number Age Fair Value Cost to Net(₹) Biological
Date (₹) Sell(₹) Assets(₹)
1st April 20X1 500 3 Years 27,000 1000 26,000 1,30,00,000
1st October 20X1 -20 3.5 Years 27,000 1,000 26,000 -5,20,000
1st October 20X1 20 1 Year 21,000 1,000 20,000 4,00,000
1,28,80,000
31st March 20X2 480 4 Years 26500 1100 25,400 1,21,92,000
20 1.5 Years 23500 1100 22,400 4,48,000
1,26,40,000
QUESTION 103:
([Link].206– Question Bank)
Company X purchased 100 beef cattle at an auction for ₹ 1,00,000 on 30 September 20X1.
Subsequent transportation costs were ₹ 1,000 that is similar to the cost X would have to
incur to sell the cattle at the auction. Additionally, there would be a 2% selling fee on the
market price of the cattle to be incurred by the seller.
On 31 March 20X2, the market value of the cattle in the most relevant market increases to ₹ 1,10,000.
Transportation costs of ₹ 1,000 would have to be incurred by the seller to get the cattle to the relevant market.
An auctioneer’s fee of 2% on the market price of the cattle would be payable by the seller.
On 1 June 20X2, X sold 18 cattle for ₹ 20,000 and incurred transportation charges of ₹150. In addition, there
was a 2% auctioneer’s fee on the market price of the cattle paid by the seller.
On 15 September 20X2, the fair value of the remaining cattle was ₹ 82,820. 42 cattle were slaughtered on
that day, with a total slaughter cost of ₹ 4,200. The total market price of the carcasses on that day was ₹
48,300, and the expected transportation cost to sell the carcasses is ₹ 420. No other costs are expected.
On 30 September 20X2, the market price of the remaining 40 cattle was ₹ 44,800. The expected transportation
cost is ₹ 400. Also, there would be a 2% auctioneer’s fee on the market price of the cattle payable by the
seller.
Pass Journal entries so as to provide the initial and subsequent measurement for all above transactions.
Interim reporting periods are of 30 September and 31 March and the company determines the fair values on
these dates for reporting.
SOLUTION:
Value of cattle at initial recognition (30 September 20X1)
(All figures in ₹)
Biological asset (cattle) Dr. 97,000*
Loss on initial recognition Dr. 4,000
To Bank (Purchase and cost of transportation) 1,01,000
(Initial recognition of cattle at fair value less costs to sell)
QUESTION 104:
([Link].303– Question Bank)
Agro Foods Ltd. runs a poultry farm business. It has received a government grant from the government for
setting up a new poultry unit in a backward area. Agro Foods Ltd used the amount of government grants
to buy the first batch of broiler birds, incubators etc. The broiler birds are measured at fair value less costs
to sell. However, the incubator machine is measured as per the cost model in Ind AS 16.
As such there are no conditions attached to the release of the government grants pertaining to purchase
of poultry birds. However, as regards the investment in incubators and other related plant and machinery
items, the government grant contains a condition that the plant and machinery item should be used for a
minimum period of 3 years. The useful life of the incubator machine has also been determined to be 3
years in accordance with the management estimate of the time period over which the economic benefits
embedded in the incubator machine shall be consumed.
Advise the accounting requirements prescribed in Ind AS 41 Agriculture and Ind AS 20 Accounting for
Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance in respect of both the government grants?
SOLUTION
Ind AS 41 requires an unconditional government grant related to a biological asset measured at its fair
value less costs to sell to be recognised in profit or loss when, and only when, the government grant
becomes receivable.
If a government grant is conditional, including when a government grant requires an entity not to engage
in specified agricultural activity, an entity should recognize the government grant in profit or loss when,
and only when, the conditions attaching to the government grant are met.
This provision of Ind AS 41 is not applicable as we have been informed that there are no conditions attached
to the release of the government grant pertaining to broiler birds.
Accordingly, the amount of government grant attributable to the broiler birds which qualify as a biological
bird shall be recognized in profit or loss account when the grant becomes receivable.
If a government grant relates to a biological asset measured at its cost less any accumulated depreciation
and any accumulated impairment losses, the entity applies Ind AS 20 Accounting for Government Grants
and Disclosure of Government Assistance.
The incubator machine does not qualify as a biological asset as it is specifically covered by Ind AS 16 which
states that plant and machinery items used to develop or maintain biological assets is covered by Ind AS
16. Therefore, the provisions relating to Government grants contained in Ind AS 41 will not apply
to the incubator machine.
Therefore, we have to apply directly the provisions contained in Ind AS 20. Ind AS 20 contains two methods
of presentation in financial statements of grants (or the appropriate portions of grants) related to assets
TOPIC 22
INDAS 101 - FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF IND AS
QUESTION 105: (July21 EXAM, MTP May’23)
([Link].103– Question Bank)
Government of India provides loans to MSMEs at a below-market rate of interest to fund the set-up of a new
manufacturing facility. Sukshma Limited's date of transition to Ind AS is 1 st April 2020.
In financial year 2014-2015, the Company had received a loan of Rs. 2.0 crore at a below - market rate of
interest from the government. Under Indian GAAP, the Company had accounted for the loan as equity and the
carrying amount was Rs. 2.0 crore at the date of transition. The amount repayable on 31 st March 2024 will be
Rs. 2.50 crore.
The Company has been advised to recognize the difference of Rs. 0.50 crores in equity by correspondingly
increasing the value of various assets under property, plant & equipment by an equivalent amount on
proportionate basis. Further, on 31st March 2024 when the loan has to be repaid, Rs. 2.50 crore should be
presented as a deduction from property, plant & equipment.
Discuss the above treatment and share your views as per applicable Ind AS.
SOLUTION
Requirement as per Ind AS:
A first-time adopter shall classify all government loans received as a financial liability or an equity
instrument in accordance with Ind AS 32. A first-time adopter shall apply the requirements in Ind AS 109
and Ind AS 20, prospectively to government loans existing at the date of transition to Ind AS and shall not
recognise the corresponding benefit of the government loan at a below-market rate of interest as a
government grant.
Treatment to be done:
Consequently, if a first-time adopter did not, under its previous GAAP, recognise and measure a
government loan at a below-market rate of interest on a basis consistent with Ind AS requirements, it shall
use its previous GAAP carrying amount of the loan at the date of transition to Ind AS as the carrying
amount of the loan in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet. An entity shall apply Ind AS 109 to the
measurement of such loans after the date of transition to Ind AS.
In the instant case, the loan meets the definition of a financial liability in accordance with Ind AS 32.
Company therefore reclassifies it from equity to liability. It also uses the previous GAAP carrying amount
of the loan at the date of transition as the carrying amount of the loan in the opening Ind AS balance sheet.
It calculates the annual effective interest rate (EIR) starting 1 st April 2020 as below: EIR = Amount /
Principal(1/t) i.e. 2.50/2(1/4) i.e. 5.74%. approx. At this rate, Rs. 2 crore will accrete to Rs. 2.50 crore as at
31st March 2024.
During the next 4 years, the interest expense charged to statement of profit and loss shall be:
Year ended Opening Interest expense for the year (Rs.) @ Closing amortised cost
amortised cost 5.74% p.a. approx. (Rs.)
(Rs.)
31st March 2021 2,00,00,000 11,48,000 2,11,48,000
31st March 2022 2,11,48,000 12,13,895 2,23,61,895
31st March 2023 2,23,61,895 12,83,573 2,36,45,468
31st March 2024 2,36,45,468 13,54,532 2,50,00,000
An entity may apply the requirements in Ind AS 109 and Ind AS 20 retrospectively to any government loan
originated before the date of transition to Ind AS, provided that the information needed to do so had been
obtained at the time of initially accounting for that loan.
The accounting treatment is to be done as per above guidance and the advice which the company has been
provided is not in line with the requirements of Ind AS 101.
SOLUTION
The carrying amount of the debenture on the date of transition under previous GAAP, assuming that all
interest accrued other than premium on redemption have been paid, will be Rs. 31,50,000 [(30,000 x 100)
+ (30,000 x 100 x 10/100 x 2/4)]. The premium payable on redemption is being recognised as borrowing
costs as per para 4(b) of AS 16 i.e., under previous GAAP on straight-line basis.
As per para D18 of Ind AS 101, Ind AS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, requires an entity to split
a compound financial instrument at inception into separate liability and equity components. If the liability
component is no longer outstanding, retrospective application of Ind AS 32 would involve separating two
portions of equity. The first portion is recognised in retained earnings and represents the cumulative
interest accreted on the liability component. The other portion represents the original equity component.
However, in accordance with this Ind AS, a first-time adopter need not separate these two portions if the
liability component is no longer outstanding at the date of transition to Ind AS.
In the present case, since the liability is outstanding on the date of transition, Sigma Ltd. will need to split
the convertible debentures into debt and equity portion on the date of transition. Accordingly, we will first
measure the liability component by discounting the contractually determined stream of future cash flows
(interest and principal) to present value by using the discount rate of 10% p.a. (being the market interest
rate for similar debentures with no conversion option).
(Rs.)
Interest payments p.a. on each debenture 6
Present Value (PV) of interest payment for years 1 to 4 (6 X 3.17) (Note 1) 19.02
PV of principal repayment (including premium) 110 X 0.68 (Note 2) 74.80
Total liability component per debenture 93.82
Equity component per debenture (Balancing figure) 6.18
Face value of debentures 100.00
Total equity component for 30,000 debentures 1,85,400
Total debt amount (30,000 X 93.82) 28,14,600
Thus, on the date of initial recognition, the amount of Rs. 30,00,000 being the amount of debentures will
be split as under:
Debt Rs. 28,14,600
Equity Rs. 1,85,400
However, on the date of transition, unwinding of Rs. 28,14,600 will be done for two years as follows:
Year Opening balance Finance cost Interest paid Closing balance
@ 10%
1 28,14,600 2,81,460 1,80,000 29,16,060
2 29,16,060 2,91,606 1,80,000 30,27,666
Therefore, on transition date, Sigma Ltd. shall –
a) Recognise the carrying amount of convertible debentures at Rs. 30,27,666;
b) Recognise equity component of compound financial instrument of Rs. 1,85,400;
c) Debit Rs. 63,066 to retained earnings being the difference between the previous GAAP amount of Rs.
31,50,000 and Rs. 30,27,666 and the equity component of compound financial instrument of Rs.
1,85,400; and
d) Derecognise the debenture liability in previous GAAP of Rs. 31,50,000.
Notes:
1. 3.17 is present value of annuity factor of Rs. 1 at a discount rate of 10% for 4 years.
2. On maturity, Rs. 110 will be paid (Rs.100 as principal payment + Rs. 10 as premium)
SOLUTION
For 80,000 share-based options vested before transition date:
Ind AS 101 provides that a first-time adopter is encouraged, but not required, to apply Ind AS 102 on
‘Share-based Payment’ to equity instruments that vested before the date of transition to Ind AS. Hence,
Nuogen Ltd. may opt for the exemption given in Ind AS 101 for 80,000 share options vested before the
transition date. However, since no earlier accounting was done for these share-based options under
previous GAAP too, therefore this led to an error on the transition date, as detected on the reporting date
i.e. 31st March, 20X4. Hence, being an error, no exemption could be availed by Nuogen Ltd. on transition
date with respect to Ind AS 102.
While preparing the financial statements for the financial year 20X3 -20X4, an error has been discovered
which occurred in the year 20X1 -20X2, i.e., for the period which was earlier than earliest prior period
presented. The error should be corrected by restating the opening balances of relevant assets and/or
liabilities and relevant component of equity for the year 20X2-20X3. This will result in consequential
restatement of balances as at 1st April, 20X2 (i.e., opening balance sheet as at 1st April, 20X2).
Accordingly, on retrospective calculation of Share based options with respect to 80,000 options, Nuogen
Ltd. will create ‘Share based payment reserve (equity)’ by Rs. 16,00,000 and correspondingly adjust the
same though Retained earnings.
Further, expenses for the year ended 31st March, 20X3 and share based payment reserve (equity) as at
31st March, 20X3 were understated because of non-recognition of ‘employee benefits expense’ and related
reserve. To correct the above errors in the annual financial statements for the year ended 31st March,
20X4, the entity should restate the comparative amounts (i.e., those for the year ended 31 st March, 20X3)
in the statement of profit and loss. In the given case, ‘Share based payment reserve (equity)’ would be
credited by Rs. 2,00,000 and ‘employee benefits expense’ would be debited by Rs. 2,00,000
For the year ending 31st March, 20X4, ‘Share based payment reserve (equity)’ would be credited by Rs.
2,00,000 and ‘employee benefits expense’ would be debited by Rs. 2,00,000.
Working Note:
SOLUTION:
Transition date (opening) IND-AS BALANCE SHEET of SHAURYA LIMITED As at 1 April 2018
(All figures are in ‘000, unless otherwise specified)
V'Smart Academy Page | 136
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
OTHER EQUITY
Retained Earnings (Rs.) Fair value reserve Total
As at 31 March, 2018 27,90,000 (W.N.1) 5,00,000 32,90,000
Working Note 1:
Retained earnings balance:
Balance as per Earlier GAAP 25,00,000
Transitional adjustment due to loan’s fair value 10,000
Transitional adjustment due to increase in mutual fund’s fair value 30,000
Transitional adjustment due to decrease in deferred tax liability 50,000
Transitional adjustment due to decrease in provisions (dividend) 2,00,000
Total 27,90,000
Disclosure forming part of financial statements:
Proposed dividend on equity shares is subject to the approval of the shareholders of the company at the
annual general meeting and should not recognized as liability as at the Balance Sheet date.
Para D7AA has to be applied for all items of property, plant and equipment. So, if D5 exemption is taken
for buildings, Ind AS will have to be applied retrospectively for other assets as well. Since, an entity elects
to measure an item of property, plant and equipment at the date of transition to Ind AS at its fair value
and use that fair value as its deemed cost at that date, it is assumed that the carrying amount of other
assets based on retrospective application of Ind AS is equal to their fair value of Rs. 10 lakhs.
Note 2: Goodwill:
Ind AS 103 mandatorily requires measuring the assets and liabilities of the acquiree at its fair value as on
the date of acquisition. However, a first-time adopter may elect to not apply the provisions of Ind AS 103
with retrospective effect that occurred prior to the date of transition to Ind AS.
Hence company can continue to carry the goodwill in its books of account as per the previous GAAP.
Note 4: Loan:
Para B8C of Ind AS 101 states that if it is impracticable (as defined in Ind AS 8) for an entity to apply
retrospectively the effective interest method in Ind AS 109, the fair value of the financial asset or the
financial liability at the date of transition to Ind ASs shall be the new gross carrying amount of that financial
asset or the new amortised cost of that financial liability at the date of transition to Ind AS.
Accordingly, Rs. 50,000 would be the gross carrying amount of loan and difference of Rs. 10,000 (Rs.
50,000 – Rs. 40,000) would be adjusted to retained earnings.
Note 8: Dividend
Dividend should be deducted from retained earnings during the year when it has been declared and
approved. Accordingly, the provision declared for preceding year should be reversed (to rectify the wrong
entry). Retained earnings would increase proportionately due to such adjustment.
Additional Information:
The Company has entered into a joint arrangement by acquiring 50% of the equity shares of ABC Pvt. Ltd.
Presently, the same has been accounted as per the proportionate consolidated method. The proportionate share
of assets and liabilities of ABC Pvt. Ltd. included in the consolidated financial statement of XYZ Pvt. Ltd. is as
under:
Particulars ₹ in Lakhs
Property, Plant & Equipment 1,200
Long Term Loans & Advances 405
Trade Receivables 280
Other Current Assets 50
Trade Payables 75
Short Term Provisions 35
SOLUTION
As per paras D31AA and D31AB of Ind AS 101, when changing from proportionate consolidation to the
equity method, an entity shall recognise its investment in the joint venture at transition date to Ind AS.
That initial investment shall be measured as the aggregate of the carrying amounts of the assets and
liabilities that the entity had previously proportionately consolidated, including any goodwill arising from
acquisition. If the goodwill previously belonged to a larger cash-generating unit, or to a group of cash-
generating units, the entity shall allocate goodwill to the joint venture on the basis of the relative carrying
amounts of the joint venture and the cash-generating unit or group of cash-generating units to which it
belonged. The balance of the investment in joint venture at the date of transition to Ind AS, determined in
accordance with paragraph D31AA above is regarded as the deemed cost of the investment at initial
recognition.
Accordingly, the deemed cost of the investment will be
Property, Plant & Equipment 1,200
Goodwill (Refer Note below) 119
Long Term Loans & Advances 405
Trade Receivables 280
Other Current Assets 50
Total Assets 2,054
Less: Trade Payables 75
Short Term Provisions 35
Deemed cost of the investment in JV 1,944
Transition Date Ind AS Balance Sheet of XYZ Pvt. Ltd. as at 1st April, 20X1
Particulars Previous Ind AS Ind AS
GAAP Adjustment GAAP
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant & Equipment 22,288 (1,200) 21,088
Investment Property 5,245 - 5,245
Intangible assets – Goodwill on Consolidation 1,507 (119) 1,388
Financial Assets
Long Term Loans & Advances 6,350 (405) 5,945
Non-current investment in JV - (405) 5,945
Current Assets
Financial Assets Investment 3,763 - 3,763
Trade Receivables 1,818 (280) 1,538
Other Current Assets 104 (50) 54
Total 41,075 (110) 40,965
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Share Capital 7,953 - 7,953
Other Equity 16,597 - 16,597
Non-Current Liabilities
Financial Liabilities
Borrowings 1,000 - 1,000
Long Term Provisions 691 - 691
Other Long Term Liabilities 5,904 - 5,904
Current Liabilities
Financial Liabilities
Trade Payables 5,455 (75) 8,380
Short Term Provisions 475 (35) 440
Total 41,075 (110) 40,965
TOPIC 23
IND AS 102 - SHARE BASED PAYMENT
QUESTION 110:
([Link].205– Question Bank)
Marathon Inc. issued 150 share options to each of its 1,000 employees subject to the service
condition of 3 years. Fair value of the option given was calculated at INR 129. Below are the
details and activities related to the SBP plan-
Year 1:
35 employees left and further 60 employees are expected to leave
Share options re-priced (as MV of shares has fallen) as the FV fell to INR 50.
After the re-pricing they are now worth INR 80, hence expense is expected to increase by INR 30.
Year 2:
30 employees left and further 36 employees are expected to leave
Year 3:
39 employees left
How the modification/ re-pricing will be accounted?
SOLUTION
The re-pricing has been done at the end of year 1, and hence the increased expense would be spread over
next 2 years equally.
Total increased value due to INR 30 (1/2 weight each years)
modification is
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
No. of employees 1,000 1,000 1,000
Employee left (35) (65) 104
Expected to leave (60) (36) -
Net employees 905 899 896
Options per employee 150 150 150
Fair value of the option 129 129 129
Period weight 1/3 2/3 3/3
Modification: 30 30
Expense (original) 58,37,250 57,59,850 57,40,500
Modification Nil 20,22,750 20,09,250
(899x150x30x1/2) (896x150x30x2/2)-
(20,22,750)
QUESTION 111:
([Link].208– Question Bank)
An entity P issues share-based payment plan to its employees based on the below details:
Number of employees 100
Fair value at grant date Rs. 25
Market condition Share price to reach at Rs. 30
Service condition To remain in service until market condition is fulfilled
Expected completion of market condition 4 years
Define expenses related to such share-based payment plan in each year subject to the below scenarios -
a) Market condition if fulfilled in year 3, or
b) Market condition is fulfilled in year 5.
SOLUTION
Market conditions are required to be considered while calculating fair value at grant date. However, service
conditions will be considered as per the expected vesting right to be exercised by the employees and would
be re-estimated during vesting period. However, if the market related condition is fulfilled before it is
expected then all remaining expenses would immediately be charged off. If market related condition takes
longer than the expected period then original expected period will be followed.
No. of Employees covered 400 Nominal Value per share Rs. 100
No. of options per Employee 60 Exercise price per share Rs. 125
Shares offered were put in three groups. Group 1 was for 20% of shares offered with vesting period one-year.
Group II was for 40% of shares offered with vesting period two- years. Group III was for 40% of shares offered
with vesting period three-years. Fair value of option per share on grant date was Rs. 10 for Group I, Rs. 12.50
for Group II and Rs. 14 for Group III.
Options not exercised immediately on vesting, were forfeited. Compute expenses to recognise in each year and
show important accounts in the books of the company.
SOLUTION
Total number of Options per employee = 60
Group I - 20% vesting in Group II - 40% vesting in Year Group III - 40% vesting in Yr.
Year 1 2 3
= 12 options, = 24 options, = 24 options,
Vesting period = 1 Yr. Vesting period = 2 Yrs. Vesting period = 3 Yrs.
Working Note:
Calculation of Securities Premium
Group I Group II Group III
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Exercise Price received per share 125.00 125.00 125.00
Value of service received per share, being the
FV of the Options 10.00 12.50 14.00
Total Consideration received per share 135.00 137.50 139.00
Less: Nominal Value per share (100.00 (100.00) (100.00)
)
Securities Premium per share 35.00 37.50 39.00
SOLUTION:
Number of employees at the grant date to whom the SARs were granted = 492 + 15 + 10 + 8 = 525
employees
The amount recognized as an expense in each year and as a liability at each year-end is as follows:
V'Smart Academy Page | 145
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
*Difference of opening liability ₹ 23,61,600 and actual liability paid ₹ 24,60,000 [(492 x 100 x 50) -
23,61,600] is recognised to Profit and loss i.e. ₹ 98,400.
SAR Ledger
Date Particular Amount Date Particular Amount
31.3.2021 To Balance 6,86,000 31.3.2021 By Employee
c/d benefits expenses 6,86,000
6,86,000 6,86,000
31.3.2022 To Balance 14,87,333 1.4.2021 By Balance b/d 6,86,000
c/d
31.3.2022 By Employee
benefits expenses 8,01,333
14,87,333 14,87,333
31.3.2022 To Balance 23,61,600 1.4.2022 By Balance b/d 14,87,333
c/d
31.3.2023 By Employee benefits
expenses 8,74,267
23,61,600 23,61,600
30.6.2023 To Bank 24,60,000 1.4.2022 By Balance b/d 23,61,600
30.6.2023 By Employee benefits
expenses 98,400
24,60,000 24,60,000
SAR Account is in the nature of liability because it is a cash settled share-based transaction which is
summed up on payment of cash to the employees at the end of the exercise period.
SOLUTION
Note: The first para of the question states that “benefits will then be settled in cash of an equivalent amount
of share price.” This implies that the award is cash settled share-based payment. However, the second and
third para talks about repricing of the option which arises in case of equity settled share-based payment.
Hence, two alternative solutions have been provided based on the information taking certain assumptions.
1st Alternative based on the assumption that the award is cash settled share-based payment.
In such a situation, the services received against share-based payment plans to be settled in cash are
measured at fair value of the liability and the liability continues to be re-measured at every reporting date
until it is actually paid off.
There is a vesting condition attached to the share-based payment plans i.e. to remain in service for next 3
years. The recognition of such share-based payment plans should be done by recognizing the fair value of
the liability at the time of services received and not at the date of grant. The liability so recognized will be
fair valued at each reporting date and difference in fair value will be charged to profit or loss for the period.
Calculation of expenses:
For the year ended 31st March 2018
= Rs. 50 x 150 awards x 900 employees x (1 year /3 years of service)
= Rs. 22,50,000
2nd Alternative based on fair value at the grant date (ignoring the fact that the award has to be
settled in cash).
Calculation of expenses:
For the year ended 31st March 2018
= [Rs. 129 x 150 awards x 900 employees x (1 year /3 years of service)]
= Rs. 58,05,000
the measurement of the amount recognised for services received as consideration for the equity
instruments granted.
If the repricing occurs during the vesting period, the incremental fair value granted is included in the
measurement of the amount recognised for services received over the period from the repricing date until
the date when the repriced equity instruments vest, in addition to the amount based on the grant date fair
value of the original equity instruments, which is recognised over the remainder of the original vesting
period. Accordingly, the amounts recognised are as follows:
Journal Entry
31st March, 2018
Employee benefits expenses Dr. 58,05,000
To SBP Reserve A/c 58,05,000
(Fair value of the liability recognized)
31st March, 2019
Employee benefits expenses Dr. 85,87,500
To SBP Reserve A/c 85,87,500
(Fair value of the liability re-measured)
31st March, 2020
Employee benefits expenses Dr. 77,88,000
To SBP Reserve A/c 77,88,000
(Fair value of the liability recognized)
SBP Reserve A/c Dr. 2,21,80,500
To Equity share capital 2,21,80,500
(Being award settled)
QUESTION 115:
([Link].601– Question Bank)
Anara Fertilizers Limited issued 2000 share options to its 10 directors for an exercise price of INR [Link]
directors are required to stay with the company for next 3 years.
Fair value of the option estimated INR 130
Expected no of Directors to vest the option 8
During the year 2, there was a crisis in the company and Management decided to cancel the scheme
immediately. It was estimated further as below-
Fair value of option at the time of cancellation was INR 90
Market price of the share at the cancellation date was INR 99
There was a compensation which was paid to directors and only 9 directors were currently in employment.
At the time of cancellation of such scheme, it was agreed to pay an amount of INR 95 per option to each of 9
directors.
How the cancellation would be recorded?
SOLUTION
Year 1 Year 2
A)
Expected directors to vest 8 9
Fair value of option 130 130
No. of options 2,000 2,000 2,000
Total 20,80,000 23,40,000
Expense weightage 1/3 Full, as it is cancelled
Expense for the year 6,93,333 16,46,667 Remaining amount since cancelled
B) Cancellation compensation
No. of directors 9
Amount agreed to pay 95
No. of options/ director 2,000
Compensation amount (9 x 95 x 2,000)Also refer working notes 1 and 17,10,000
Working Notes:
1. Amount to be deducted from Equity
No. of directors 9
Fair value of option (at the date of cancellation) 90
No. of options/ director 2,000
Total 16,20,000
QUESTION 116:
([Link].703– Question Bank)
A parent, Company P, grants 30 shares to 100 employees each of its subsidiary, Company S, on condition
that the employees remain employed by Company S for three years. Assume that at the outset, and at the
end of Years 1 and 2, it is expected that all the
employees will remain employed for all the three years. At the end of Year 3, none of the employees has left.
The fair value of the shares on grant date is ₹ 5 per share.
Company S agrees to reimburse Company P over the term of the arrangement for 75 percent of the final
expense recognised by Company S. What would be the accounting treatment in the books of Company P and
Company S?
SOLUTION:
Company S expects to recognise an expense totaling ₹15,000 (30 shares x 100 employees x ₹5 per share)
and, therefore, expects the total reimbursement to be ₹11,250 (₹15,000 x 75%). Company S therefore
reimburses Company P ₹3,750 (₹11,250 x 1/3) each year.
Accounting by Company S
In each of Years 1 to 3, Company S recognises an expense in profit or loss, the cash paid to Company P,
and the balance of the capital contribution it has received from Company P.
Journal Entry
Employee benefits expenses Dr. 5,000
To Cash/Bank 3,750
To Equity (Contribution from the parent) 1,250
(To recognise the share-based payment expense and partial
reimbursement to parent)
Accounting by Company P
In each of Years 1 to 3, Company P recognises an increase in equity for the instruments being granted, the
cash reimbursed by Company S, and the balance as investment for the capital contribution it has made to
Company S.
Journal Entry
Investment in Company S Dr. 1,250
Cash/Bank Dr. 3,750
To Equity
(To recognise the grant of equity instruments to employees of 5,000
subsidiary less partial reimbursement from subsidiary)
TOPIC 24
INDAS 105 - NON-CURRENT ASSETS
HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
QUESTION 117: (Similar in MTP Nov’23)
([Link].202– Question Bank)
S Ltd purchased a property for ₹6,00,000 on 1 April 20X1. The useful life of the property is 15 years.
On 31 March 20X3 S ltd classify the property as held for sale. The impairment testing provides the estimated
recoverable amount of ₹4,70,000.
The fair value less cost to sell on 31 March 20X3 was ₹4,60,000. On 31 March 20X4 management change
the plan as property no longer met the criteria of held for sale. The recoverable amount as at 31 March 20X4
is ₹5,00,000.
Value the property at the end of 20X3 and 20X4.
SOLUTION
(a) Value of property immediately before the classification as held for sale as per Ind AS 16 as on 31 March
20X3
Purchase Price 6,00,000
Less: Accumulated Depreciation 80,000 (for two years)
Less: Impairment loss 50,000 (5,20,000-4,70,000)
Carrying Amount 4,70,000
On initial classification as held for sale on 31 March 20X3, the value will be lower of:
Carrying amount ₹ 4,70,000
Fair Value less Cost to sell ₹ 4,60,000
On 31 March 20X3 Non-current classified as held for sale will be recorded at ₹ 4,60,000.
Depreciation of ₹ 40,000 and Impairment Loss of ₹ 60,000 (50,000 +10,000) is charged in profit or loss for
the year ended 31 March 20X3.
(b) On 31 March 20X4 held for sale property is reclassified as criteria doesn’t met. The value will be lower
of:
Carrying amount had the asset is not classified as held for sale ₹ 4,33,846
Carrying amount immediately before classification on 31 March 20X3 ₹ 4,70,000
Less Depreciation based on 13 years balance life ₹ 36,154
Recoverable Amount ₹ 5,00,000
On 15th September 20X1, Entity A decided to sell the business. It noted that the business meets the
condition of disposal group classified as held for sale on that date in accordance with Ind AS 105. However,
it does not meet the conditions to be classified as discontinued operations in accordance with that standard.
The disposal group is stated at the following amounts immediately prior to reclassification as held for sale.
Entity A proposed to sell the disposal group at ₹ 19,00,000. It estimates that the costs to sell will be ₹ 70,000.
This cost consists of professional fee to be paid to external lawyers and accountants.
As at 31st March 20X2, there has been no change to the plan to sell the disposal group and entity A still
expects to sell it within one year of initial classification. Mr. X, an accountant of Entity A remeasured the
following assets/ liabilities in accordance with respective standards as on 31st March 20X2:
Available for sale: (In ₹ ‘000)
Financial assets 410
Deferred tax assets 230
Current assets- Inventory, receivables and cash balances 400
Current liabilities 900
Non- current liabilities- provisions 250
The disposal group has not been trading well and its fair value less costs to sell has fallen to ₹ 16,50,000.
Required:
What would be the value of all assets/ labilities within the disposal group as on the following dates in
accordance with Ind AS 105?
(a) 15 September, 20X1 and
(b) 31st March, 20X2
SOLUTION:
a) As at 15 September, 20X1
The disposal group should be measured at ₹ 18,30,000 (19,00,000-70,000). The impairment write down
of ₹ 3,30,000 (₹ 21,60,000 – ₹ 18,30,000) should be recorded within profit from continuing operations.
The impairment of ₹ 3,30,000 should be allocated to the carrying values of the appropriate non-current
assets.
Asset/ (liability) Carrying value as Impairment Revised carrying
at15 September, value as per IND
20X1 AS 105
Attributed goodwill 200 (200) -
Intangible assets 930 (62) 868
Financial asset measured at fair value through other 360 - 360
comprehensive income
Property, plant & equipment 1020 (68) 952
The impairment loss is allocated first to goodwill and then pro rata to the other assets of the disposal group
within Ind AS 105 measurement scope. Following assets are not in the measurement scope of the
standard- financial asset measured at other comprehensive income, the deferred tax asset or the current
assets. In addition, the impairment allocation can only be made against assets and is not allocated to
liabilities.
b) As on 31 March, 20X2:
All of the assets and liabilities, outside the scope of measurement under Ind AS 105, are remeasured in
accordance with the relevant standards. The assets that are remeasured in this case under the relevant
standards are the financial asset measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (Ind AS 109),
the deferred tax asset (Ind AS 12), the current assets and liabilities (various standards) and the non-current
liabilities (Ind AS 37).
SOLUTION:
PROVISION AS PER IND AS 105
1. In terms of Ind AS 105, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, an entity shall
classify a non-current asset (or disposal group) as held for sale if its carrying amount will be recovered
principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use.
2. For this to be the case, the asset (or disposal group) must be available for immediate sale in its present
condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets (or disposal groups)
and its sale must be highly probable.
3. For the sale to be highly probable, the appropriate level of management must be committed to a plan to
sell the asset (or disposal group), and an active programme to locate a buyer and complete the plan must
have been initiated. Further, the asset (or disposal group) must be actively marketed for sale at a price
that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value.
4. In addition, the sale should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year
from the date of classification, except in specific cases as permitted by the Standard, and actions
required to complete the plan should indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will
be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
5. The probability of required approvals (as per the jurisdiction) should be considered as part of the
assessment of whether the sale is highly probable.
6. An entity that is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control of a subsidiary shall classify all the
assets and liabilities of that subsidiary as held for sale when the criteria set out above are met, regardless
of whether the entity will retain a non-controlling interest in its former subsidiary after the sale.
1) Based on the provisions highlighted above, the disposal of D Ltd. appears to meet the criteria of held
for sale. J Ltd. is the probable acquirer, and the sale is highly probable, expected to be completed seven
months after the year end, well within the 12-months criteria highlighted above.
2) Accordingly, D Ltd. should be treated as a disposal group, since a single equity transaction is the most
likely form of disposal.
3) In case D Ltd. is deemed to be a separate major component of business or geographical area of the group,
the losses of the group should be presented separately as a discontinued operation within the Financial
Statements of M Ltd.
4) In terms of Ind AS 105, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, an entity shall
measure a non-current asset (or disposal group) classified as held for sale at the lower of its carrying
amount and fair value less costs to sell.
5) The carrying amount of D Ltd. (i.e., the subsidiary of M Ltd.) comprises of the net assets and goodwill
less the non-controlling interest. The impairment loss recognised to reduce D Ltd. to fair value less costs
to sell should be allocated first to goodwill and then on a pro-rata basis across the other non-current
assets of the Company.
6) The Chief Operating Officer (COO) is incorrect to exclude any form of restructuring provision in the
Financial Statements. Since the disposal is communicated to the media as well as the Stock Exchange,
a constructive obligation exists. However, ongoing costs of business should not be provided for,
only directly attributable costs of restructuring should be provided. Future operating losses should be
excluded as no obligating event has arisen, and no provision is required for impairment losses of
Property, Plant and Equipment as it is already considered in the remeasurement to fair value less costs
to sell.
7) Thus, a provision is required for ₹ 13.75 crores (₹ 3.75 crores + ₹ 10 crores).
TOPIC 25
INDAS 108 - OPERATING SEGMENTS
SOLUTION:
An entity has eight segments and the relevant information is as follows:
Criteria 1: Segment revenue is 10% or more of total external + intersegment sales
Segments A B C D E F G H Total
Total sales 100 315 45 15 15 50 25 35 600
% to total sales 16.7 52.5 7.5 2.5 2.5 8.3 4.2 5.8
Reportable segments A B - - - - -
Segments A B C D E F G H Total
% to segment loss 5 90 15 5 8 5 5 7
Reportable segments - B C - - - - -
Hence, in the above scenario, additional operating segments need to be identified as reportable segments,
till the 75% test is satisfied, even if those segments do not satisfy the quantitative threshold limits.
QUESTION 121: (SIMILAR TO MTP May22 & July21 EXAM & May18 EXAM, Exam May’23)
([Link].401– Question Bank)
X Ltd. is operating in coating industry. Its business segment comprise coating and others consisting of
chemicals, polymers and related activities. Certain information for financial year 20X1-20X2 is given below :
(Rs in lakhs)
Segments External sale Tax Other operating Result Assets Liabilities
income
Coating 2,00,000 5,000 40,000 10,000 50,000 30,000
Others 70,000 3,000 15,000 4,000 30,000 10,000
Additional information:
1. Unallocated revenue net of expenses is Rs. 30,00,00,000
2. Interest and bank charges is Rs. 20,00,00,000
3. Income tax expenses is Rs. 20,00,00,000 (current tax Rs. 19,50,00,000 and deferred tax Rs. 50,00,000)
4. Investments Rs. 1,00,00,00,000 and unallocated assets Rs. 1,00,00,00,000.
5. Unallocated liabilities, Reserve & surplus and share capital are Rs. 2,00,00,00,000, Rs. 3,00,00,00,000 &
Rs. 1,00,00,00,000 respectively.
6. Depreciation amounts for coating & others are Rs. 10,00,00,000 and Rs. 3,00,00,000 respectively.
7. Capital expenditure for coating and others are Rs. 50,00,00,000 and Rs. 20,00,00,000 respectively.
8. Revenue from outside India is Rs. 3,00,00,00,000 and segment asset outside India Rs. 1,00,00,00,000.
Based on the above information, how X Ltd. would disclose information about reportable segment
revenue, profit or loss, assets and liabilities for financial year 20X1-20X2?
SOLUTION:
Segment information
(A) Information about operating segment
(1) the company’s operating segments comprise :
Coatings: consisting of decorative, automotive, industrial paints and related activities. Others:
consisting of chemicals, polymers and related activities.
Investments 10,000
Unallocated assets 10,000
Total Assets 1,00,000
(b) Liabilities/Shareholder’s funds
Segment liabilities 30,000 10,000 40,000
Unallocated liabilities 20,000
Share capital 10,000
Reserves and surplus 30,000
Total liabilities/shareholder’s funds 1,00,000
(c) Others
Capital Expenditure (5,000) (2,000)
Depreciation (1,000) (300)
Geographical Information (Rs in lakhs)
India (Rs ) Outside Total (Rs )
India (Rs)
Revenue 2,00,000 62,000 2,62,000
Segment assets 90,000 10,000 1,00,000
Capital expenditure 7,000 - 7,000
Notes:
(i) The operating segments have been identified in line with the Ind AS 108, taking into account the nature
of product, organisation structure, economic environment and internal reporting system.
(ii) Segment revenue, results, assets and liabilities include the respective amounts identifiable to each of
the segments. Unallocable assets include unallocable fixed assets and other current assets.
Unallocable liabilities include unallocable current liabilities and net deferred tax liability.
(iii) Corresponding figures for previous year have not been provided. However, in practical scenario the
corresponding figures would need to be given.
TOPIC 26
INDAS 111 - JOINT ARRANGEMENTS
SOLUTION
For a joint arrangement to be either a joint operation or joint venture, it depends on whether the parties to
the joint arrangement have rights to the assets and obligations for liabilities (will be a joint operation) OR
whether the parties to the joint arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement (will be joint
venture).
(i) In order to fit into the definition of a joint arrangement, the parties to the joint arrangement should
have joint control over the arrangement. In the given case, decisions relating to relevant activities, i.e.,
marketing and distribution, are solely controlled by X Ltd and such decisions do not require the
consent of Y Ltd. Hence, the joint control test is not satisfied in this arrangement and the
arrangement does not fit into the definition of a joint arrangement in accordance with the
Standard.
(ii) Where X Ltd and Y Ltd both jointly control all the relevant activities of the arrangement and since no
separate entity is formed for the arrangement, the joint arrangement is in the nature of a joint
operation.
(iii) Where under a joint arrangement, a separate vehicle is formed to give effect to the joint arrangement,
then the joint arrangement can either be a joint operation or a joint venture.
Hence in the given case, if:
(a) The contractual terms of the joint arrangement, give both X Ltd and Y Ltd rights to the assets and
obligations for the liabilities relating to the arrangement, and the rights to the corresponding
revenues and obligations for the corresponding expenses, then the joint arrangement will be in
the nature of a joint operation.
(b) The contractual terms of the joint arrangement, give both X Ltd and Y Ltd. rights to the net assets
of the arrangement, then the joint arrangement will be in the nature of a joint venture.
(iv) Where the rights to assets and liabilities to obligations are not clear from the contractual arrangement,
then other facts and circumstances also need to be considered to determine whether the joint
arrangement is a joint operation or a joint venture.
When the provision of the activities of the joint venture is primarily to produce output and the output
is available / distributed only to the parties to the joint arrangement in some pre-determined ratio,
then this indicates that the parties have substantially all the economic benefits of the assets of the
arrangement. The only source of cash flows to the joint arrangement is receipts from parties through
their purchases of the output and the parties also have a liability to fund the settlement of liabilities
of the separate entity. Such an arrangement indicates that the joint arrangement is in the nature of a
joint operation.
In the given case, the output of the joint arrangement is exclusively used by X Ltd. and Y Ltd. and the
joint arrangement is not allowed to sell the output to outside parties. Hence, the joint arrangement
between X Ltd. and Y Ltd. is in the nature of a joint operation.
(v) It makes no difference whether the output of the joint arrangement is exclusively for use by the parties
to the joint arrangement or the parties to the arrangement sold their share of the output to third
parties.
Hence, even if X Ltd. and Y Ltd. sold their respective share of output to third parties, the fact still
remains that the joint arrangement cannot sell output directly to third parties. Hence, the joint
arrangement will still be deemed to be in the nature of a joint operation.
(vi) Where the terms of the contractual arrangement enable the separate entity to sell the output to third
parties, this would result in the separate entity assuming demand, inventory and credit risks. Such
facts and circumstances would indicate that the arrangement is a joint venture.
For the above Block, Company X, Y & Z has entered into unincorporated Joint Venture.
Company Y is the Operator of the Block AWM/01. Company X & Company Z are the Joint Operators.
Company Y incurs all the expenditure on behalf of Joint Venture and raise cash call to Company X &
Company Z at each month end in respect of their share of expenditure incurred in Joint Venture. All the
manpower and requisite facilities / machineries owned by the Joint venture and thereby owned by all the
Joint Operators.
For past few months, due to liquidity issues, Company Z defaulted in payment of cash calls to operators.
Therefore, company Y (Operator) has issued notice to company Z for withdrawal of their participating right
from on 01.04.20X1. However, company Z has filed the appeal with arbitrator on 30.04.20X1.
Financial performance of company Z has not been improved in subsequent months and therefore company
Z has decided to withdraw participating interest rights from Block AWM/01 and entered into sale agreement
with Company X & Company Y. As per the terms of the agreement, dated 31.5.20X1, Company X will receive
33.33% share & Company Y will receive 66.67% share of PI rights owned by Company Z.
Company X is required to pay ₹ 1 Lacs against 33.33% share of PI rights owned by Company Z.
After signing of sale agreement, Operator (company Y) approach government of India for modification in PSC
(Production Sharing Contract) i.e. removal of Company Z from PSC of AWM/01 and government has approved
V'Smart Academy Page | 159
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
this transaction on 30.6.20X1. Government approval for the modification in PSC is essential given the
industry in which the joint operators operate.
Additional Information:
1. Fair Value of PPE & Development CWIP owned by Company Z as per Market participant approach is ₹
5,00,000 & ₹ 2,00,000 respectively.
2. Fair Value of all the other assets and liabilities acquired are assumed to be at their carrying values (except
cash & cash equivalent). Cash and cash equivalents of Company Z are not to be acquired by Company X
as per the terms of agreement.
3. Tax rate is assumed to be 30%.
4. As per Ind AS 28, all the joint operators are joint ventures whereby each parties that have joint control of
the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement and therefore every operator records
their share of assets and liabilities in their books.
SOLUTION:
(1) Ind AS 103 defines business as an integrated set of activities and assets that is capable of being
conducted and managed for the purpose of providing goods or services to customers, generating
investment income (such as dividends or interest) or generating other income from ordinary activities.
For a transaction to meet the definition of a business combination (and for the acquisition method of
accounting to apply), the entity must gain control of an integrated set of assets and activities that is
more than a collection of assets or a combination of assets and liabilities.
To be capable of being conducted and managed for the purpose identified in the definition of a business,
an integrated set of activities and assets requires two essential elements—inputs and processes applied
to those inputs.
Therefore, an integrated set of activities and assets must include, at a minimum, an input and a
substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output.
In the aforesaid transaction, Company X acquired share of participating rights owned by Company Z
for the producing Block (AWM/01). The output exist in this transaction (Considering AWM/01) is a
producing block. Also all the manpower and requisite facilities / machineries are owned by Joint venture
and thereby all the Joint Operators. Hence, acquiring participating rights tantamount to acquire inputs
(Expertise Manpower & Machinery) and it is critical to the ability to continue producing outputs. Thus,
the said acquisition will fall under the Business Acquisition and hence standard Ind AS 103 is to
be applied for the same.
(2) As per paragraph 8 of Ind AS 103, acquisition date is the date on which the acquirer obtains control of
the acquiree. Further, paragraph 9 of Ind AS 103 clarifies that the date on which the acquirer obtains
control of the acquiree is generally the date on which the acquirer legally transfers the consideration,
acquires the assets and assumes the liabilities of the acquiree—the closing date. However, the acquirer
might obtain control on a date that is either earlier or later than the closing date.
An acquirer shall consider all pertinent facts and circumstances in identifying the acquisition date.
Since government of India (GOI) approval is a substantive approval for Company X to acquire control of
Company Z's operations, the date of acquisition cannot be earlier than the date on which approval is
obtained from GOI. This is pertinent given that the approval from GOI is considered to be a substantive
process and accordingly, the acquisition is considered to be completed only on receipt of such approval.
Hence acquisition date in the above scenario is 30.6.20X1.
Working Notes
1. Determination of Company Z's balance acquired by Company X on 30.6.20X1
(Acquisition Date)
Particulars As per Company Carrying Acquisition Remarks
Z Books Value 33.33% Date Value
30.6.20X1 Share
₹ ₹ ₹
Assets
Non - Current Assets
Property, Plant & Equipment 3,00,000 99,990 1,66,650 Note 1
Right of Use Asset 20,000 6,666 6,666
Development CWIP 1,00,000 33,330 66,660 Note 2
Financial Assets
Loan receivable 50,000 16,665 16,665
Total Non-Current Assets 4,70,000 1,56,651 2,56,641
Current assets
Inventories 3,00,000 9,999 9,999
Financial Assets
Trade receivables 1,00,000 33,330 33,330
Cash and cash equivalents 2,00,000 66,660 66,660
Other Current Assets 50,000 6,665 16,665
*In extremely rare circumstances, an acquirer will make a bargain purchase in a business combination in
which the value of net assets acquired in a business combination exceeds the purchase consideration. The
acquirer shall recognise the resulting gain in other comprehensive income on the acquisition date and
accumulate the same in equity as capital reserve, if the reason for bargain purchase gain is clear and
evidence exist. If there does not exist clear evidence of the underlying reasons for classifying the business
combination as a bargain purchase, then the gain shall be recognised directly in equity as capital reserve.
Since in above scenario it is clearly evident that due to liquidity issues, Company Z has to withdraw their
participating right from AWM/01. The said bargain purchase gain should be transferred to other
comprehensive income on the acquisition date.
Note: As per Ind AS 103, in case an entity acquires another entity step by step through series of purchase
then the acquisition date will be the date on which the acquirer obtains control. Till the time the control is
obtained the investment will be accounted as per the requirements of other Ind AS 109, if the investments
are covered under that standard or as per Ind AS 28, if the investments are in Associates or Joint Ventures.
If a business combination is achieved in stages, the acquirer shall remeasure its previously held equity
interest in the acquiree at its acquisition-date fair value and recognise the resulting gain or loss, if any, in
profit or loss or other comprehensive income, as appropriate.
Since in the above transaction, company X does not hold any prior interest in Company Z & company holds
only 30% PI rights in Block AWM/01 trough unincorporated joint venture, this is not a case of step
acquisition.
Answer
Paragraphs 15-17 of Ind AS 111 state that a joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that
have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities, relating to
the arrangement. Those parties are called joint operators.
Further, a joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement
have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. Those parties are called joint venturers.
Furthermore, an entity applies judgement when assessing whether a joint arrangement is a joint operation
or a joint venture. An entity shall determine the type of joint arrangement in which it is involved by
considering its rights and obligations arising from the arrangement. An entity assesses its rights and
obligations by considering the structure and legal form of the arrangement, the terms agreed by the parties
in the contractual arrangement and, when relevant, other facts and circumstances.
In the given case, accounting by P Limited and Q Limited would be as follows:
(i) Five floors that P Limited controls
Five floors that are controlled by P Limited shall be accounted for by P Limited as investment
property under Ind AS 40, Investment Property, which defines the term ‘investment property’
as property (land or a building—or part of a building—or both) held (by the owner or by the
lessee under a finance lease) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both, rather than for:
(a) use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes; or
(b) sale in the ordinary course of business.
For the two floors that are jointly controlled by P Limited and Q Limited, as per the contractual arrangement,
both P Limited and Q Limited will share net profits or net losses equally i.e. they both have the rights to the
net assets of the arrangement. Thus, the arrangement in respect of these two floors is a joint venture and
shall be accounted for accordingly by P Limited and Q Limited.
TOPIC 27
INDAS 113 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
QUESTION 125:
([Link].02– Question Bank)
ABC Ltd. acquired 5% equity shares of XYZ Ltd. for Rs. 10 crore in the year 20X1-X2. The company is in
process of preparing the financial statements for the year 20X2-X3 and is assessing the fair value at
subsequent measurement of the investment made in XYZ Ltd. Based on the observable input, the ABC Ltd.
identified a similar nature of transaction in which PQR Ltd. acquired 20% equity shares in XYZ Ltd. for Rs. 60
crore. The price of such transaction was determined on the basis of Comparable Companies Method (CCM) -
Enterprise Value (EV) / EBITDA which was 8. For the current year, the EBITDA of XYZ Ltd. is Rs. 40 crore. At
the time of acquisition, the valuation was determined after considering 5% of liquidity discount and 5% of non-
controlling stake discount. What will be the fair value of ABC Ltd.’s investment in XYZ Ltd. as on the balance
sheet date?
SOLUTION:
Determination of Enterprise Value of XYZ Ltd.
Particulars Rs. in crore
EBITDA as on the measurement date 40
EV/EBITDA multiple as on the date of valuation 8
Enterprise value of XYZ Ltd. 320
a. Labour costs
Labour costs are developed based on current marketplace wages, adjusted for expectations of future wage
increases, required to hire contractors to dismantle and remove offshore oil platforms. A Ltd. assigns
probability to a range of cash flow estimates as follows: Cash Flow Estimates: 100 Cr 125 Cr 175 Cr
Probability: 25% 50% 25%
c. The compensation that a market participant would require for undertaking the activity and for assuming
the risk associated with the obligation to dismantle and remove the asset. Such compensation includes
both of the following:
i. Profit on labour and overhead costs:
A profit mark-up of 20% is consistent with the rate that a market participant would require as
compensation for undertaking the activity
ii. The risk that the actual cash outflows might differ from those expected, excluding inflation:
A Ltd. estimates the amount of that premium to be 5% of the expected cash flows. The expected cash
flows are 'real cash flows' / 'cash flows in terms of monetary value today'.
d. Effect of inflation on estimated costs and profits
A Ltd. assumes a rate of inflation of 4 percent over the 10-year period based on available market data.
SOLUTION
Amount (In Cr)
Expected Labour Cost (Refer W.N.) 131.25
Allocated Overheads (80% x 131.25 Cr) 105.00
Profit markup on Cost (131.25 + 105) x 20% 47.25
Total Expected Cash Flows before inflation 283.50
Inflation factor for next 10 years (4%) (1.04)10 = 1.4802
Expected cash flows adjusted for inflation 283.50 x 1.4802 419.65
Risk adjustment - uncertainty relating to cash flows (5% x 419.64) 20.98
Total Expected Cash Flows (419.65+20.98) 440.63
Discount rate to be considered = risk-free rate + 5% + 3.5% 8.5%
entity's non-performance risk
Expected present value at 8.5% for 10 years (440.63 / (1.08510)) 194.97
Working Note:
Expected labour cost:
Cash Flows Estimates Probability Expected Cash Flows
100 Cr 25% 25 Cr
125 Cr 50% 62.50 Cr
175 Cr 25% 43.75 Cr
Total 131.25 Cr
QUESTION 127: (SIMILAR TO May’22 EXAM, RTP Nov’21, MTP May’23, MTP Nov’23)
([Link].08– Question Bank)
(I) Entity A owns 250 ordinary shares in company XYZ, an unquoted company. Company XYZ has a total share
capital of 5,000 shares with nominal value of ₹ 10. Entity XYZ’s after-tax maintainable profits are estimated
at ₹ 70,000 per year. An appropriate price/earnings ratio determined from published industry data is 15
(before lack of marketability adjustment). Entity A’s management estimates that the discount for the lack of
marketability of company XYZ’s shares and restrictions on their transfer is 20%. Entity A values its holding in
company XYZ’s shares based on earnings. Determine the fair value of Entity A’s investment in XYZ’s
shares.
(ii) Based on the facts given in the aforementioned part (I), assume that, Entity A estimates the fair value of
the shares it owns in company XYZ using a net asset valuation technique. The fair value of company XYZ’s
net assets including those recognised in its balance sheet and those that are not recognised is ₹ 8,50,000.
Determine the fair value of Entity A’s investment in XYZ’s shares.
SOLUTION
(i) An earnings-based valuation of Entity A's holding of shares in company XYZ could be calculated as
follows:
Particulars Unit
Entity XYZ's after-tax maintainable profits (A) ₹ 70,000
QUESTION 128: (SIMILAR TO MTP Aug18 & Nov18 EXAM & Nov19 EXAM)
([Link].09– Question Bank)
An asset is sold in two different active markets at different prices. Manor Ltd. enters into transactions in
both markets and can access the price in those markets for the asset at the measurement date.
In the Mumbai market, the price that would be received is Rs 290, transaction costs in that market are Rs
40 and the costs to transport the asset to that market are Rs 30. Thus, the net amount that would be
received is Rs 220.
In the Kolkata market the price that would be received is Rs 280, transaction costs in that market are Rs
20 and the costs to transport the asset to that market are Rs 30. Thus, the net amount that would be
received in Kolkata market is Rs 230.
(i) What should be the fair value of the asset if Mumbai Market is the principal market? What should be
fair value if none of the markets is a principal market?
(ii) The net realization after expenses is more in the export market, say Rs 280, but the Government allows
only 15% of the production to be exported out of India. Discuss what would be fair value in such a
case.
SOLUTION
i)
a) If Mumbai Market is the principal market
If Mumbai Market is the principal market for the asset (i.e., the market with the greatest volume and level
of activity for the asset), the fair value of the asset would be measured using the price that would be received
in that market, after taking into account transportation costs.
Fair value will be
Rs.
Price receivable 290
Less: Transportation cost (30)
Fair value of the asset 260
Rs
Price receivable 280
Less: Transportation cost (30)
Fair value of the asset 250
V'Smart Academy Page | 167
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
ii) Export prices are more than the prices in the principal market and it would give the highest return
compared to the domestic market. Therefore, the export market would be considered as the most
advantageous market. But since the Government has capped the export, maximum upto 15% of total
output, maximum sale activities are being done at domestic market only i.e. 85%. Since the highest level
of activities with the highest volume is being done in the domestic market, the principal market for assets
would be the domestic market. Therefore, the prices received in the domestic market would be used for
fair valuation of assets.
TOPIC – 28
INDAS 103 – BUSINESS COMBINATION
QUESTION 129
([Link].802 - Question Bank)
P Ltd. acquired 30% shares in S Ltd. for Rs. 3,50,000 on 1/04/2017, thereafter purchased another lot of
40% shares in S Ltd. for Rs. 5,25,000 on 1/10/2017. Followings are the Balance Sheets of P and S as on
31/03/2018:
Particulars Parent Ltd. Subsidiary Ltd.
PPE 15,00,000 9,00,000
Investments in S Ltd. 8,75,000 -
Other Assets 6,25,000 6,00,000
Share Capital 12,00,000 8,00,000
Other Equity 10,00,000 3,50,000
Liabilities 8,00,000 3,50,000
1. At the time of acquiring control, NCI was calculated at Fair Value based on the shares acquired by P
on that date.
2. Fair value of previous equity investment of P on 30/09/2017 is to be calculated with reference to the
transaction value of purchase of 2nd lot.
3. Subsidiary co. paid dividend on 15/12/18 for the year 16-17 Rs. 80000.
4. Abnormal loss on 21/08/2017 was Rs. 25000 in subsidiary co.
Statement of Profit and Loss for the year ending 31/03/2018 of P and S
Particulars Parent Ltd. Subsidiary Ltd.
Incomes
Revenue from Operation 18,00,000 10,00,000
Dividend Received 56,000 -
Expenses (including abnormal loss) 12,00,000 8,50,000
Net Profits/Total Comprehensive Income 6,56,000 1,50,000
W.N. 1: -
NCI: -
NCI as on DOA (FV) 3,93,750
+ Post Acquisition share 26,250
(-) Dividend Paid (24,000)
3,96,000
W.N.2: -
Cost of Control: -
FV of 40% Consideration 5,25,0000
FV of 30% Investment 3,93,750
+ NCI 30% as on DOA 3,93,750
(-) 100% Net Assets (11,42,500)
Goodwill 1,70,000
W.N. 3: -
DOA Changes Balance Sheet
ESC 8,00,000 - 8,00,000
Other Equity 2,80,000 70,000 3,50,000
+ DIvidend - 80,000
10,80,000 1,50,000
+ Abnormal Loss - 25,000
10,80,000 1,75,000
+/- T. Adjustment (6 Months) 87,500 (87,500)
11,67,500 87,500
(-) Abnormal Loss (25,000) -
11,42,500 87,500
100% Net Assets P – 61,250
NCI – 26,250
(Rs. in crore)
Share of profit or loss 700
Share of exchange difference in OCI 100
SOLUTION:
Paragraph 42 of Ind AS 103 provides that in a business combination achieved in stages, the acquirer
shall remeasure its previously held equity interest in the acquiree at its acquisition-date fair value
and recognize the resulting gain or loss, if any, in statement of profit and loss or other comprehensive
income, as appropriate. In prior reporting periods, the acquirer may have recognized changes in the value
of its equity interest in the acquiree in other comprehensive income. If so, the amount that was recognized
in other comprehensive income shall be recognized on the same basis as would be required if the acquirer
had disposed directly of the previously held equity interest.
Applying the above, PQR Ltd. records the following entry in its consolidated financial statements:
(Rs. in crore)
Debit Credit
Identifiable net assets of XYZ Ltd. Dr. 30,000
Goodwill (W.N.1) Dr. 4,000
Foreign currency translation reserve Dr. 100
PPE revaluation reserve Dr. 50
To Cash 25,000
To Investment in associate -XYZ Ltd. 8,850
To Retained earnings (W.N.2) 50
To Gain on previously held interest in XYZ recognized in P or l 250
(W.N.3)
(To recognize acquisition of XYZ Ltd.)
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of Goodwill
(Rs. in crore)
Cash consideration 25,000
Add: Fair value of previously held equity interest in XYZ Ltd. 9,000
Total consideration 34,000
Less: Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired (30,000)
Goodwill 4,000
2. The credit to retained earnings represents the reversal of the unrealized gain of Rs. 50 crore in
Other Comprehensive Income related to the revaluation of property, plant and equipment. In
accordance with Ind AS 16, this amount is not reclassified to profit or loss.
3. The gain on the previously held equity interest in XYZ Ltd. is calculated as follows:
(Rs. in crore)
Fair Value of 30% interest in XYZ Ltd. at 1st April, 20X2 9,000
Carrying amount of interest in XYZ Ltd. at 1st April, 20X2 (8,850)
150
Unrealised gain previously recognized in OCI 100
Gain on previously held interest in XYZ Ltd. recognized in profit or 250
loss
(b) transfer the reserve relating to the net measurement losses on the defined benefit liability of ₹ 2.7
crore (90% of ₹ 3 crore) attributable to the owners of the parent within equity to retained earnings. It
is not reclassified to profit or loss. The remaining 10% (i.e., ₹ 0.3 crore) attributable to the NCI is
included as part of the carrying amount of NCI that is derecognised in calculating the gain or loss on
loss of control over the subsidiary. No amount is reclassified to profit or loss, nor is it transferred
within equity, in respect of the 10% attributable to the non-controlling interest.
(c) reclassify the cumulative gain on fair valuation of equity investment of ₹ 3.6 crore (90% of ₹ 4 crore)
attributable to the owners of the same parent from OCI to retained earnings under equity as per
paragraph B5.7.1 of Ind AS 109, Financial Instruments, which provides that in case an entity has
made an irrevocable election to recognise the changes in the fair value of an investment in an equity
instrument not held for trading in OCI, it may subsequently transfer the cumulative amount of gains
or loss within equity. The remaining 10% (i.e., ₹ 0.4 crore) related to the NCI are derecognised along
with the balance of NCI and not reclassified to profit and loss.
(d) reclassify the foreign currency translation reserve of ₹ 7.2 crore (90% × ₹ 8 crore) attributable to the
owners of the parent to statement of profit or loss as per paragraph 48 of Ind AS 21 ‘The Effects of
Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates’, which specifies that the cumulative amount of exchange
differences relating to the foreign operation, recognised in OCI, shall be reclassified from equity to
profit or loss on the disposal of foreign operation. This is reflected in the gain on disposal. Remaining
10% (i.e., ₹ 0.8 crore) relating to the NCI is included as part of the carrying amount of the NCI that is
derecognised in calculating the gain or loss on the loss of control of subsidiary, but is not reclassified
to profit or loss in pursuance of paragraph 48B of Ind AS 21, which provides that the cumulative
exchange differences relating to that foreign operation attributed to NCI shall be derecognised on
disposal of the foreign operation, but shall not be reclassified to profit or loss.
The impact of loss of control over BC Limited on the consolidated financial statements of AB Limited is
summarised below: (₹ in crore)
QUESTION 132
([Link].1104 - Question Bank)
The Balance Sheets of three companies Sun Ltd., Moon Ltd. and Light Ltd. as at 31st March, 2018 are given
below:
Sun Ltd. Moon Ltd. Light Ltd.
Equity & Liabilities:
Shareholder Funds:
Share Capital (of Rs.10 each) 1,50,000 1,00,000 60,000
Reserves 50,000 40,000 30,000
Profit and Loss A/c 60,000 50,000 40,000
Current Liabilities:
Sundry Creditors 30,000 35,000 25,000
Sun Ltd. - 10,000 8,000
2,90,000 2,35,000 1,63,000
Assets:
Non-Current Assets:
Fixed Assets 70,000 1,20,000 1,03,000
Investments (at Cost)
Shares in Moon Ltd. 90,000 - -
Shares in Light Ltd. 40,000 - -
Shares in Light Ltd. - 50,000 -
Current Assets:
Stock-in-Trade 40,000 30,000 20,000
Debtors 20,000 25,000 30,000
Due from Moon Ltd. 12000 - -
Due from Light Ltd. 8,000 - -
Cash in Hand 10,000 10,000 10,000
2,90,000 2,35,000 1,63,000
(a) Sun Ltd. held 8,000 shares of Moon Ltd. and 1,800 shares of Light Ltd.
(b) Moon Ltd. held 3,600 shares of Light Ltd.
(c) All investments were made on 1st July, 2017.
(d) The following balances were there on 1st July, 2017:
SOLUTION:
Sun Ltd. hold 8% in Moon Ltd.
Moon Ltd. hold 60% in Light Ltd.
Sun Ltd. hold 30% in Light Ltd.
Working Note - 1:
a) Sun to Moon:
Sun’s Share in Moon 80%
NCI in Moon 20%
B) Sun to Light
Sun’s Share in Light (60% x 80%) + 30% = 78%
NCI in Light = 22%
Working Note – 2:
Statement of Changes in Net assets:
Particulars DOA Changes Balance Sheet
Profit & Loss General Reserve
Equity share Capital 1,00,000 - - 1,00,000
Profit & Loss 20,000 30,000 - 50,000
General Reserve 25,000 - 15,000 40,000
(-) Eliminate - (1,000) - -
1,45,000 29,000 15,000
100% Net Assets as 80% - Holding- 80% - Holding-
on Date of 23,200 12,000
Acquisition 20% -NCI- 5,800 20% -NCI- 3,000
Moon Limited:
Particulars DOA Changes Balance
Sheet
Profit & Loss General Reserve
Equity share Capital 60,000 - - 60,000
Profit & Loss 25,000 15,000 - 40,000
General Reserve 15,000 - 15,000 30,000
- (1,000) - -
1,00,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
100% Net Assets as 78% - Holding- 78% - Holding-
on Date of 11,700 11,700
Acquisition 22% -NCI- 3,300 22% -NCI- 3,300
Working Note – 3:
Cost of Control:
Particulars For Moon For Light
Investment by Sun in Moon 90,000 -
Investment by Sun in Light (Direct) (30%) - 40,000
Investment by Sun in Light (Indirect) - 40,000
(50,000 x 80%)
90,000 80,000
(+) Non-Controlling Interest : - -
(1,45,000 x 20%) in Moon @ 20% 29,000 -
(1,00,000 x 22%) in Light @ 22% - 22,000
(-) 100% Met Assets (1,45,000) (1,00,000)
Goodwill / (Gain from Bargain Purchase) (26,000) 2,000
Working Note – 4:
Calculation of Non-Controlling Interest:
Working Note – 5:
Consolidated other Equity:
Particulars Profit & General Other Comprehensive
Loss Reserve Income / Capital Reserve
Balance of Sun limited 60,000 50,000 -
(+) Post Acquisition share - - -
From Moon 23,200 12,000 -
From Light 11,700 11,700 -
Gain from Bargain Purchase - - 26,000
Total 94,900 73,700 26,000
Division Mobiles along with its assets and liabilities was sold for Rs. 25 crores to Turnaround Ltd. a new
company, who allotted 1 crores equity shares of Rs. 10 each at a premium of Rs. 15/- per share to the members
of Enterprise Ltd. in full settlement of the consideration, in proportion to their shareholding in the company.
One of the members of the Enterprise Ltd. was holding 52% shareholding of the Company.
Assuming that there no other transactions, you are asked to:
(i) Pass journal entries in the books of Enterprise Ltd.
(ii) Prepare the Balance Sheet of Enterprise Ltd. after the entries in (i)
(iii) Prepare the Balance Sheer of Turnaround Ltd.
Solution:
Journal of Enterprise Ltd.
(Rs. in crores)
Dr. Rs Cr. Rs
Loan funds Dr. 300
Current liabilities Dr. 400
Provision for Depreciation Dr. 400
To fixed Assets 500
To Current Assets 500
To Capital Reserve 100
(Being division Mobiles along with its assets and liabilities sold to
turnaround Ltd. for Rs 25 crores)
Notes:
(i) Any other alternative set of entries, with the same net effect on various accounts, may be
given by the students.
(ii) In the given scenario, this assets and liabilities will meet the definition of common control
transaction.
Accordingly, the transfer of assets and liabilities will be derecognized and recognized as per book value
and the resultant loss or gain will be recorded as capital reserve in the books of demerged entity
(Enterprise Ltd.).
Enterprise Ltd.
Balance Sheet after reconstruction
(Rs. in crores)
Assets Note No. Amount
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 25
Current assets
Other current assets 200
225
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Equity share capital (of face value of INR 10 each) 25
Other equity (R&S + CR) 1 175
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Current liabilities 25
225
Notes to Account:
(Rs. in crores)
1. Reserves and surplus 75
Add: Capital Reserves on reconstruction 100
175
Notes to Accounts:
Consequent on transfer of Division Mobiles to newly incorporated company Turnaround Ltd. the
member of the company have been allotted 1 crore equity shares of Rs 10 each at a premium of Rs
V'Smart Academy Page | 177
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
15 per share of Turnaround Ltd. in full settlement of the consideration in proportion to their
shareholding in the company.
Balance Sheet of Turnaround Ltd.
Assets Note No. Amount
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 100
Current assets
Other current assets 500
600
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Equity share capital (of face value of INR 10 each) 1 10
Other equity (Security Premium + {Surplus} + {CR}) (110)
Liabilities
Non-Current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Borrowings 300
Current liabilities
Current liabilities 400
600
Notes to Accounts
(Rs in crores)
1. Shares Capital:
Issued and paid-up capital
1 crores Equity shares of Rs 10 each fully paid up 10
All the above share have been issued for consideration other than cash, to the
members of Enterprise ltd. on takeover of Division Mobiles from Enterprise Ltd.)
Working Notes:
In the given case, since both the entities are under common control, this will be accounted as
follows”
❖ All assets and liabilities will be recorded at book value
❖ Identity of reserves to be maintained.
❖ No goodwill will be recorded.
❖ Securities issued will be recorded as per the nominal value.
ABX Ltd. issued requisite number of shares to discharge the claims of the equity shareholders of the
transferor companies.
Prepare a note showing purchase consideration and discharge thereof and draft the Balance Sheet of ABX
Ltd:
(a) Assuming that both the entities are under common control
(b) Assuming BX ltd is a larger entity and their management will take the control of the entity. The
fair value of net assets of AX and BX limited are as follows;
SOLUTION
(a) (Assumption: Common control transaction)
1. Calculation of Purchase Consideration
AX Ltd. BX Ltd.
(Rs. ‘000) (Rs. ‘000)
Assets taken over:
Fixed assets 8500
Investments 1050
Inventory 1250
Trade receivable 1800
Cash & bank 450
Gross Assets 13050
Less: Liabilities
12% Debenture 300 4000
Trade payables 1000 (4000) 1500 (5500)
Net Assets taken over 9050 9700
Less: Reserve and surplus:
General Reserve 1500 2000
P & L A/c 1000 500
Investment Allowance Reserve 500 100
Export Profit Reserve 50 (3050) 100 (2700)
Purchase Consideration 6000 7000
The total purchase consideration is to be discharged by ABX Ltd. in such a way that the rights of the
shareholders of AX Ltd. and BX Ltd. remain unaltered in the future profit of ABX Ltd.
Notes to Accounts
(Rs. 000) Rs. 000)
1 Share capital
13,00,000 Equity Shares of Rs 10 each 13000
2. Reserve and surplus
General Reserve (1500+2000) 3500
Profit & Loss (1000+500) 1500
Investment Allowance Reserve (500+100) 600
Export Profit Reserve (50+100) 150 5750
3 Long term Borrowing
12% debenture (Assumed that new debenture were issued in 7000
exchanged of the old series) (3000+4000)
(b) Assessment: In this case BX Ltd. and AX Ltd. are not under common control and hence Ind AS
103 for business combination accounting will be applied. A question arises here is who is the
accounting acquirer AXBCX Ltd which is issuing the share or AX Ltd. or BX Ltd. As per the
accounting guidance provided in Ind AS 103 sometimes the legal acquirer may not be the
accounting acquirer. In the given scenario although AX BX Ltd. is issuing the share but the BX
Ltd. post-merger will have control and is bigger in size which is a clear indicator that BX Ltd.
will be accounting acquirer. Accordingly, the following accounting steps has to be followed:
❖ BX Ltd. assets will be recorded at historical cost in the merged financial statements.
❖ Shares issued to the shareholders of BX Ltd. will be recorded at nominal value and the shares
issued to the members of AX Ltd. will be recorded at the fair value of the business which is 11000.
❖ The above purchase price will be allocated to the assets and liabilities of AX Ltd. at fair value and
the resultant amount will be recorded as goodwill.
(In ‘000s)
X Ltd. Y Ltd.
Fair Value 11,000 14,000
Value per share 10 10
No. of shares 1,100 1,400
i.e. Total No. of shares in XY Ltd. = 2,500 thousand shares
Thus, % Held by each Company in Combined Entity 44% 56%
Notes to Accounts
Rs (‘000) Rs (‘000)
1. Share Capital
1,25,000 Equity Shares of Rs 10 each (700,000) to BX 12500
Ltd and 550,000 as computed above to AX Ltd)
2. Reserves and Surplus
Security Premium 5500
General reserve of BX Ltd 2200
P & L BX Ltd 500
Export Profit Reserve of BX Ltd 100
Investment Allowance Reserve of BX Ltd 100 8200
3. Long Term Borrowings
12% Debenture (Assumed that new debenture were 7000
issued in exchanged of the old series)
QUESTION 135
([Link].1403 - Question Bank)
'Bread' Limited is a company carrying on the business of Dairy products and is having a subsidiary 'Butter'
Limited. Their Balance-sheets as on 31st March 2019 were as under:
ASSETS Bread Limited Butter
(Rs) Limited (Rs)
Non-Current Assets
Fixed Assets 21,70,000 6,25,000
Investments
4060 Shares in Butter 5,10,400 -
Current Assets
Inventories 4,80,000 3,19,200
Trade Receivable 1,80,000 1,64,000
Bills Receivable 68,000 1,00,000
Cash and Bank Balance 87,100 15,300
Total 34,95,500 12,23,500
SOLUTION:
Working Note – 1: Statement of Changes in Net assets:
Particulars DOA Changes Balance Sheet
General Profit & 31/03/2019
Reserve Loss
Equity share Capital 5,80,00 5,80,00
Profit & Loss 1,02,000 1,03,000 2,05,000
General Reserve 85,000 35,000 65,000
7,67,000 1,38,000
(+/-) Dividend Paid - 58,000
Normal Profits 7,67,000 1,96,000
(+/-) Time Adjustments - -
Normal Balance 7,67,000 1,96,000
100% Net 75% - Holding-
Assets as on 1,37,200
Date of 30% -NCI-
Acquisition 58,800
1) Shareholder’s Fund
a) Equity share Capital 25,00,000
b) Other equity 6,35,600
c) Non-Controlling Interest 2,71,500
2) Non-Current Liabilities
3) Current Liabilities
a) Trade Receivable 6,90,500
b) Bills Payable 96,000
41,93,600
6,45,000 5,90,000
3,00,000 2,50,000
1,00,000 1,75,000
4,00,000 4,25,000
58,60,000 26,15,000
Additional Information:
Ishwar Ltd.’s investment in Vinayak Ltd.
On 1st April, 20X1, Ishwar Ltd. acquired 400 million shares in Vinayak Ltd. by means of a share exchange of
one share in Ishwar Ltd. for every two shares acquired in Vinayak Ltd. On 1st April, 20X1, the market value
of one share of Ishwar Ltd. was ₹ 7.
Ishwar Ltd. appointed a professional firm for conducting due diligence for acquisition of Vinayak Ltd., the cost
of which amounted to ₹ 15 million. Ishwar Ltd. included these acquisition costs in the carrying amount of the
investment in Vinayak Ltd. in the draft balance sheet of Ishwar Ltd. There has been no change to the carrying
amount of this investment in Ishwar Ltd.’s own balance sheet since 1 st April, 20X1.
On 1st April, 20X1, the individual financial statements of Vinayak Ltd. showed the following balances:
- Retained earnings ₹ 750 million
- Other components of equity₹ 25 million
The directors of Ishwar Ltd. carried out a fair value exercise to measure the identifiable assets and liabilities
of Vinayak Ltd. at 1st April, 20X1. The following matters emerged:
- Property having a carrying amount of ₹ 800 million (land component ₹ 350 million, buildings
component ₹ 450 million) had an estimated fair value of ₹ 1,000 million (land component ₹ 400
million, buildings component ₹ 600 million). The buildings component of the property had an
estimated useful life of 30 years at 1st April, 20X1.
- Plant and equipment having a carrying amount of ₹ 600 million had an estimated fair value of ₹
700 million. The estimated remaining useful life of this plant at 1st April, 20X1 was four years.
None of this plant and equipment had been disposed of between 1st April, 20X1 and 31st March,
20X4.
- On 1st April, 20X1, the notes to the financial statements of Vinayak Ltd. disclosed contingent
liability. On 1st April, 20X1, the fair value of this contingent liability was reliably measured at ₹
30 million. The contingency was resolved in the year ended 31st March, 20X2 and no payments
were required to be made by Vinayak Ltd. in respect of this contingent liability.
- The fair value adjustments have not been reflected in the individual financial statements of
Vinayak Ltd. In the consolidated financial statements, the fair value adjustments will be
regarded as temporary differences for the purposes of computing deferred tax. The rate of
deferred tax to apply to temporary differences is 20%.
The directors of Ishwar Ltd. used the proportion of net assets method when measuring the non-controlling
interest in Vinayak Ltd. in the consolidated balance sheet.
Provision
On 1st April, 20X3, Ishwar Ltd. completed the construction of a non-current asset with an estimated useful life
of 20 years. The costs of construction were recognised in property, plant and equipment and depreciated
appropriately. Ishwar Ltd. has a legal obligation to restore the site on which the non-current asset is located
on 31st March, 2X43. The estimated cost of this restoration work, at 31st March, 2X43 prices, is ₹ 125 million.
The directors of Ishwar Ltd. have made a provision of ₹ 6.25 million (1/20 x ₹ 125 million) in the draft balance
sheet at 31st March, 20X4.
An appropriate annual discount rate to use in any relevant calculations is 6% and at this rate the present value
of ₹ 1 payable in 20 years is 31.2 paise.
Prepare the consolidated balance sheet of Ishwar Ltd. at 31 st March, 20X4. Consider deferred tax
implications.
Solution :
Consolidated Balance Sheet of Ishwar Ltd. at 31st March, 20X4
Particulars ₹ in ‘000s
Assets
Non-current Assets:
Property, Plant and Equipment
[(26,20,000 + 18,50,000) + {(2,00,000 (W.N.1) – 15,000 (W.N.1)) +
(1,00,000 (W.N.1) – 75,000 (W.N.1)) + (39,000 – 1,950) (WN 7)}] 47,17,050
Investment (21,15,000 – 14,00,000 – 15,000) 7,00,000
Goodwill (W.N.2) 1,85,600
Total non-current assets 56,02,650
Current Assets:
Inventories (6,00,000 + 3,75,000) 9,75,000
Trade Receivables (4,50,000 + 3,30,000) Cash and Cash 7,80,000
Equivalents (75,000 + 60,000) 1,35,000
Total current assets 18,90,000
TOTAL ASSETS 74,92,650
Equity and Liabilities
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent Share Capital
Retained Earnings (W.N.5) 7,00,000
Other Components of Equity (W.N.6) 30,31,960
12,70,000
Non-controlling Interest (W.N.4) 50,01,960
Total equity 3,53,600
53,55,560
Non-current Liabilities
Provisions (39,000 + 2,340 (W.N.7))
Long-term Borrowings (4,13,750 + 4,50,000) Deferred Tax (W.N.8) 41,340
Total non-current liabilities 8,63,750
4,07,000
13,12,090
Current Liabilities
Trade and Other Payables (3,00,000 + 2,50,000) 5,50,000
Short-term Borrowings (1,00,000 + 1,75,000) 2,75,000
Total Current Liabilities 8,25,000
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 74,92,650
Working Notes:
1. Computation of Net Assets of Vinayak Ltd.
1st April, 31st March, 20X4
20X1 (Date of
(Date of consolidation)
acquisition) ₹ in ‘000s
₹ in ‘000s
Share Capital 5,00,000 5,00,000
Retained Earnings:
Per accounts of Vinayak Ltd. 7,50,000 10,50,000
Fair Value Adjustments:
Property (10,00,000 – 8,00,000)* #2,00,000 $2,00,000
(1,00,000 x ¾) $(75,000)
(from
above)) (54,000)
Date of Consolidation (20% x $2,10,000
(from above)) (42,000)
Net Assets for Consolidation 14,91,000 17,68,000
The post-acquisition increase in Net Assets is ₹ 2,77,000 (₹ 17,68,000 –
₹ 14,91,000). ₹ 25,000 of this increase is due to changes in Other Components
of Equity and the remaining ₹ 2,52,000 due to changes in retained earnings.
B. Current Assets
Financial Assets
A. Equity
Financial Liabilities
Borrowings 4 - 1,00,000
C. Current Liabilities
Financial Liabilities
Notes to Accounts
Note Particulars Hammer Sleek Ltd.
No. Ltd. (₹)
(₹)
1. Property, Plant and Equipment
(a) Plant and Machinery 2,00,000 1,25,000
(b) Furniture and Fittings 4,00,000 2,00,000
6,00,000 3,25,000
2. Intangible Assets
Goodwill 1,25,000 75,000
3. Other Equity
(a) General Reserve 2,00,000 1,25,000
(b) Retained Earnings 3,50,000 2,50,000
5,50,000 3,75,000
4. Borrowings
8% Debentures of ₹ 100 each - 1,00,000
Additional information:
Hammer Ltd. acquired 20,000 equity shares of Sleek Ltd. on 1 st April, 2022 at a cost of ₹ 2,40,000 and
further acquired 17,500 equity shares on 1 st October, 2022 at a cost of ₹ 1,92,500;
The 8% debentures of Sleek Ltd. includes debentures held by Hammer Ltd. of nominal value of ₹ 35,000.
These were acquired by Hammer Ltd. on 1st January, 2022 at a cost of ₹ 84,000;
The retained earnings of Sleek Ltd. had a credit balance of ₹ 75,000 as on 1st April, 2022. On that date the
balance of General Reserve was ₹ 50,000;
- Sleek Ltd. had paid dividend @ 10% on its paid-up equity share capital out of the balance of
retained earnings as on 1st April, 2022 for the financial year 2021-2022. The entire dividend
received by Hammer Ltd. was credited in its statement of profit and loss;
- As per the resolution dated 28th February 2023, Sleek Ltd. had allotted bonus shares @ 1 equity
share for every 10 shares held out of its general reserve. The accounting effect has not been given;
- Trade receivables of Hammer Ltd. includes bills receivables of ₹ 2,00,000 drawn upon Sleek Ltd.
Out of this, bills of ₹ 50,000 have been discounted with bank;
- During the financial year 2022-2023, Hammer Ltd. purchased goods from Sleek Ltd., of
₹ 25,000 at a sales price of ₹ 30,000, 40% of these goods remained unsold on 31st March, 2023;
- On 1st October, 2022, machinery of Sleek Ltd. was overvalued by 20,000 for which necessary
adjustments are to be made. Depreciation is charged @ 10% per annum:
- The parent company i.e., Hammer Ltd. has adopted an accounting policy to measure non-controlling
interest at fair value (quoted market price) applying Ind AS 103. Assume the fair value per equity
share of Sleek Ltd. at ₹ 11 on the date when control of Sleek Ltd. was acquired by Hammer Ltd.
You are required to prepare a consolidated balance sheet, as per Ind AS, of Hammer Ltd. and its subsidiary
Sleek Ltd. as at 31st March, 2023.
Solution
Consolidated Balance Sheet of Hammer Ltd. as at 31st March, 2023
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 1 9,06,000
Intangible assets 1 2,00,000
Financial assets
Investment 1 2,33,500
Current assets
Inventories 1 2,83,000
Financial assets
Total 25,87,500
Equity
Share capital - Equity shares of ₹ 10 each 2 10,00,000
Other equity 3 7,47,750
Non-controlling interest (W.N.) 1,74,750
Non-current liabilities:
Financial liabilities
Borrowings 1 65,000
Current Liabilities:
Financial liabilities
Bank Overdraft 1 1,50,000
Trade payables 1 4,50,000
Total 25,87,500
Notes to Accounts
Note 1: Assets and Liabilities ₹
*6,25,000 – 2,40,000-1,92,500
Working Notes:
1. Consolidated Other Equity
Particulars General Retained
Reserve Earnings
Standalone - Hammer Ltd. 2,00,000 3,50,000
Less: Fair Value Loss of existing stake
[2,40,000 - (20,000 x 11)] (20,000)
Less: Loss on cancellation of debentures (49,000)
Add: Share in Post-acquisition Profits 28,125 83,625
2,28,125 3,64,625
*Note: Bonus shares issued in 1:10 ratio i.e. ₹ 50,000 and bonus issue has not been accounted for yet. The
opening balance of the general reserve is ₹ 50,000 while the closing balance is ₹ 1,25,000 which implies that
₹ 75,000 have been transferred during the year and this amount should be allocated between pre and post-
acquisition based on time proportion. Therefore, the general reserve on the date of acquisition will be ₹
50,000 + 50% of ₹ 75,000 i.e. ₹ 37,500 = ₹ 87,500. Here, it should be noted that the date of bonus issue is
28th February, 2023 and bonus amount is ₹ 50,000. Since the balance of post-acquisition general reserve
(50% of ₹ 75,000 i.e. ₹ 37,500) is insufficient, it is assumed that bonus shares are issued from pre-
V'Smart Academy Page | 191
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
acquisition general reserve i.e. balance on the date of acquisition assuming that transfer to general reserve,
in general, is an appropriation of profit which is done at the end of the year. This implies that outstanding
balance in general reserve at the time of bonus issue is the opening balance.
However, one may assume otherwise like insufficient post-acquisition balance of ₹ 12,500 (50,000 – 37,500)
has only been adjusted through pre-acquisition share of ₹ 87,500 or first adjustment of bonus issue has
been done and later bifurcation of remaining balance has been done into pre and post-acquisition. In such
a case balance of consolidated general reserve (post-acquisition), net worth, bargain purchase and NCI will
undergo a change.
(vii) Dividends were declared but were not accounted for by all these companies in the books before the
year end. Similarly, the bonus issued by S Limited was not reflected in the statement of financial
position as on 31st March 2024.
You are required to take note of the above available information and draw the consolidated balance – sheet
of H Limited as at 31st March 2024. Notes to accounts are not required.
Solution
Note: Since adjustments (v) and (vii) of the question state that dividend has been declared by all the entities
but no information is provided whether it has been paid or due. In this regard, it may be noted that since
dividend is paid for the entire year 2023-2024, it is assumed as final dividend which is approved in the
Annual General Meeting conducted at later point time from the reporting date.
Accordingly, following assumptions are possible based on which alternative solutions have been provided:
A. Ignored the adjustment for dividend completely as dividend has to be approved in the Annual
General Meeting.
B. Considered dividend as declared but not paid.
C. Considered dividend as declared and paid.
Alternative A:Ignored the adjustment for dividend completely as it has to be approved in the AGM.
Consolidated Balance Sheet of H Ltd. and its subsidiary S Ltd. and Associate A Ltd. as at 31st
March, 2024
Rs.
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (Rs. 5,50,000 + Rs. 10,30,000
4,80,000)
Goodwill (Rs. 70,000- Impaired Rs. 70,000) Nil
Financial assets
Investment in A Ltd. (W.N.1 (iii)) 2,05,600
Current assets
Inventory (Rs. 4,85,000+ Rs. 3,82,500) 8,67,500
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents (Rs. 89,000 + Rs. 98,000) 1,87,000
Trade receivables (Rs. 3,95,000+Rs. 3,05,000) 7,00,000
Total 29,90,100
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Share capital - Equity shares of Rs. 10 each 5,00,000
Other equity (W.N.4+ W.N.1(i)) 11,10,600
Non-controlling interest (W.N.3) 2,85,000
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Borrowings-term loans (Rs. 4,00,000 + Rs. 1,50,000) 5,50,000
Current Liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables (Rs.3,79,000+Rs. 1,65,500) 5,44,500
Total 29,90,100
Working Notes:
1. Computation of Investment in Associate A Ltd. as per Equity method
(i) Capital reserve on the date of acquisition
The cost of the investment is lower than the net fair value of the investee’s identifiable assets and
liabilities. Hence there is capital reserve calculated as follows:
Rs.
Cost of acquisition of investment 1,00,000
H Ltd.’s share in fair value of net assets of A Ltd.
on the date of acquisition [(1,00,000 + 1,75,000)
x 40%] (1,10,000)
Capital Reserve 10,000
(ii) Closing balance of investment of Associate A Ltd. at the end of the year
Rs.
Cost of acquisition of investment 1,00,000
Add: Capital reserve 10,000
Share in post-acquisition profit 99,600
Less: Unrealised gain on inventory [(60,000 x
20/120) x 40%] (4,000)
Closing balance of investment 2,05,600
2. Analysis of Retained Earnings of S Ltd.
(i) Retained Earnings (RE) of S Ltd. Rs.
(ii) Computation of net worth (net identifiable assets) as on 31st October, 2023
Rs.
Goodwill 70,000
9,25,600 1,75,000
Note: Bonus issue by a subsidiary is a transaction with owner in their capacity as owner. Therefore, bonus
issue is only a transfer from one component of equity to the other thereby not changing the equity.
Accordingly, though bonus issue shall be accounted in the individual financial statements of subsidiary,
the same shall not have any effect in consolidated financial statements of the Group.
Alternative B: Considered dividend as declared but not paid Consolidated Balance Sheet of H Ltd.
and its subsidiary S Ltd. and
Associate A Ltd. as at 31st March, 2024
Rs.
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (Rs. 5,50,000 +
Rs. 4,80,000) 10,30,000
Goodwill (Rs. 70,000- Impaired Rs. 70,000) Nil
Financial assets
Investment in A Ltd. (Refer W.N.1 (iii)) 1,99,600
Current assets
Inventory (Rs. 4,85,000 + Rs. 3,82,500) 8,67,500
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents (Rs. 89,000+ Rs. 1,87,000
98,000)
Trade receivables (Rs. 3,95,000+Rs. 3,05,000) 7,00,000
Other Receivables
(Dividend receivable from A Ltd. (Rs. 15,000 x 6,000
40%)
Total 29,90,100
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Share capital - Equity shares of Rs. 10 each 5,00,000
Other equity (W.N.4+W.N.1(i)) 10,60,600
Non-controlling interest (W.N.3) 2,79,000
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Borrowings- term loans (Rs. 4,00,000 + Rs. 1,50,000) 5,50,000
Current Liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables (Rs. 3,79,000+Rs. 1,65,500) 5,44,500
Other payables 56,000
[Dividend payable to NCI by S Ltd. (Rs. 20,000 x 30%)
Rs. 6,000+ Dividend payable by H Ltd. to its
shareholders Rs. 50,000)
Total 29,90,100
Working Notes:
1. Computation of Investment in Associate A Ltd. as per Equity method
(i) Capital reserve on the date of acquisition
The cost of the investment is lower than the net fair value of the investee’s identifiable assets
and liabilities. Hence there is capital reserve calculated as follows:
Rs.
Cost of acquisition of investment 1,00,000
Less: H Ltd.’s share in fair value of net assets of A
Ltd. on the date of acquisition [(1,00,000 +
1,75,000) x 40%] (1,10,000)
Capital Reserve 10,000
Capital reserve is recorded directly in equity.
(ii) Share in profit of A Ltd.
Rs.
Share in post-acquisition profit of A Ltd.
[(4,24,000-1,75,000) x 40%] 99,600
Less: Dividend (1,00,000 x 15% x 40%) (6,000)
Share in profit of A Ltd. 93,600
(i) Closing balance of investment of Associate A Ltd. at the end of the year
V'Smart Academy Page | 197
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
Rs.
Cost of acquisition of investment 1,00,000
Add: Capital reserve 10,000
Share in post-acquisition profit 93,600
Less: Unrealised gain on inventory
[(60,000 x 20/120) x 40%] (4,000)
Closing balance of investment 1,99,600
(ii) Computation of net worth (net identifiable assets) as on 31st October, 2023
Rs.
8,89,600 1,61,000
Rs.
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (Rs. 5,50,000 +
Rs. 4,80,000) 10,30,000
Goodwill (Rs. 70,000- Impaired Rs. 70,000) Nil
Financial assets
Investment in A Ltd. (Refer W.N.1 (iii)) 1,99,600
Current assets
Inventory (Rs. 4,85,000+ Rs. 3,82,500) 8,67,500
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents [(Rs. 89,000 - Rs.
50,000 + 1,37,000
Rs. 14,000 + Rs. 6,000) + (Rs. 98,000 - Rs.
20,000)]
Trade receivables (Rs. 3,95,000+Rs. 3,05,000) 7,00,000
Total 29,34,100
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Share capital - Equity shares of Rs. 10 each 5,00,000
Other equity (W.N.4+W.N.1(i)) 10,60,600
Non-controlling interest (W.N.3) 2,79,000
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Borrowings- term loans (Rs. 4,00,000 + Rs. 5,50,000
1,50,000)
Current Liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables (Rs. 3,79,000+Rs. 1,65,500) 5,44,500
Total 29,34,100
Working Notes:
1. Computation of Investment in Associate A Ltd. as per Equity method
(i) Capital reserve on the date of acquisition
The cost of the investment is lower than the net fair value of the investee’s identifiable assets
and liabilities. Hence there is capital reserve calculated as follows:
Rs.
Cost of acquisition of investment 1,00,000
Less: H Ltd.’s share in fair value of net assets
of A Ltd. on the date of acquisition
[(1,00,000 + 1,75,000) x 40%] (1,10,000)
Rs.
Share in post-acquisition profit of A Ltd. [(4,24,000 - 99,600
1,75,000) x 40%]
Less: Dividend (1,00,000 x 15% x 40%) (6,000)
Share in profit of A Ltd. 93,600
(iii) Closing balance of investment of Associate A Ltd. at the end of the year
Rs.
Cost of acquisition of investment 1,00,000
Add: Capital reserve 10,000
Share in post-acquisition profit 93,600
Less: Unrealised gain on inventory [(60,000 x
20/120) x 40%] (4,000)
Closing balance of investment 1,99,600
(ii) Computation of net worth (net identifiable assets) as on 31st October, 2023
Rs.
8,89,600 1,61,000
Note: Bonus issue by a subsidiary is a transaction with owner in their capacity as owner. Therefore, bonus
issue is only a transfer from one component of equity to the other thereby not changing the equity.
Accordingly, though bonus issue shall be accounted in the individual financial statements of subsidiary, the
same shall not have any effect in consolidated financial statements of the Group.
each of Swan Limited in lieu of every six shares held by the shareholders of Duck Limited. The fair value of
the shares of Swan Limited was ₹100 per share as on the date of acquisition.
Swan Limited also agreed to pay an additional consideration being higher of ₹90 lakhs and 30% of any
excess profits in the first year, after acquisition, over Duck Limited's profits in the preceding 12 months
(financial year 2022-2023) made by Duck Limited. The additional amount will be due in 3 years post the
date of acquisition. Duck Limited earned ₹30 lakhs profit in the preceding year and expects to earn ₹40
lakhs in financial year 2023-2024.
The fair value exercise resulted in the following:
i. Fair value of Property, Plant and Equipment and Investments of Duck Limited on 1 st April, 2023
was ₹1,200 lakhs and ₹300 lakhs respectively.
ii. Duck Limited owns a popular brand name that meets the recognition criteria for Intangible
Assets under Ind AS 103 'Business Combinations'. Independent valuers have attributed a fair
value of ₹250 lakhs for the brand. However, the brand does not have any cost for tax purposes
and no tax deductions are available for the same.
iii. Following is the statement of contingent liabilities of Duck Limited as on 1st April, 2023:
Solution
(a) Consolidated Balance Sheet of Swan Ltd as on 1st April, 2023
Notes No. ₹in lakhs
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 9 2,000.00
Intangible assets 10 250.00
Financial assets
Investment 11 1,200.00
Current assets
Inventories 12 620.00
Financial assets:
Trade receivables 13 1,580.00
Cash and cash equivalents 14 640.00
Other current assets 15 1,050.00
Total 7,340.00
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
Share capital - Equity shares of ₹10 each 1 1,260.00
Other equity 2 2,475.18
Non-controlling interest (W.N.4) 330.70
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Long-term borrowings 3 1,200.00
Long-term provisions 4 407.62
Deferred tax liability 5 231.50
Current Liabilities
Financial liabilities
Short-term borrowings 6 540.00
Trade payables 7 870.00
Short-term provision 8 25.00
Total 7,340.00
2) Other Equity
As per the balance sheet before acquisition of Duck Ltd. 1,450
3) Long-term borrowings
As per the balance sheet before acquisition of Duck Ltd. 700
Duck Ltd. 500 1,200
4) Long-term provisions
As per the balance sheet before acquisition of Duck Ltd. 140
Deferred consideration 67.62
Duck Ltd. 200 407.62
7) Trade payables
As per the balance sheet before acquisition of Duck Ltd. 500
Duck Ltd. 370 870
8) Short-term provisions
Lawsuit damages 5
Income-tax demand 20 25
11) Investment
As per the balance sheet before acquisition of Duck Ltd. 900
Duck Ltd. 300 1,200
12) Inventories
As per the balance sheet before acquisition of Duck Ltd. 360
Duck Ltd. 260
620
640
Working Notes:
1. Computation of Purchase Consideration
Particulars No. of ₹ in
shares lakhs
2. Computation of deferred tax impact due to change in fair value of asset and liabilities
acquired
Particulars Book Fair FV
value value adjustment
(A) (B) (A-B)
3. Computation of fair value of net identifiable assets acquired f rom Duck Ltd.
Particulars Book value
Total assets as per the balance sheet 2,680
Add: Fair value adjustment in PPE and Investment 260
(200+60)
Add: Intangible assets (Brand) 250
Fair value of total identifiable assets 3,190
Less: Total liabilities as per the balance sheet (1,360)
(500+200+290+370)
Less: Contingent liability acquired
Lawsuit damages 5
Income tax demand 20 (25)
Notes:
(a) The value of replacement award is allocated between consideration transferred and post combination
expense. The portion attributable to purchase consideration is determined based on the fair value of
the replacement award for the service rendered till the date of the acquisition. Accordingly, ₹4.8 lakh
(12 x 2/5) is considered as a part of purchase consideration and is credited to Swan Ltd.’s equity as
this will be settled in its own equity. Since the fair value of the award on the acquisition date is ₹18 lakh
the balance of (18 - 4.8) ₹13.2 lakh will be recorded as employee expense in the books of Duck Ltd. over
the remaining life, which is 1 year in this scenario.
(b) With respect to deferred consideration, ₹90 lakh is the minimum payment to be paid after 3 years. The
other element is if company meet certain target then they will get 30% of that or ₹90 lakh whichever is
higher. In the given case, since the minimum what is expected to be paid the fair value of the contingent
consideration has been considered as zero. The impact of time value on deferred consideration has been
given @ 10%.
(c) The additional consideration of ₹15 lakhs to be paid to the founder shareholder is contingent to him/her
continuing in employment and hence this will be considered as employee compensation and will be
recorded as post combination expenses in the statement of profit and loss of Duck Ltd.
TOPIC - 29
INDAS 115 - REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH
CUSTOMERS
QUESTION 140
([Link].104 - Question Bank)
An entity promises to sell 120 products to a customer for Rs. 120,000 (Rs. 1,000 per product). The products
are transferred to the customer over a six-month period. The entity transfers control of each product at a point
in time. After the entity has transferred control of 60 products to the customer, the contract is modified to
require the delivery of an additional 30 products (a total of 150 identical products) to the customer at a price
of Rs. 950 per product which is the standalone selling price for such additional products at the time of placing
this additional order. The additional 30 products were not included in the initial contract.
It is assumed that additional products are contracted for a price that reflects the stand-alone selling price.
Determine the accounting for the modified contract?
SOLUTION
Solution Suggested by ICAI:
When the contract is modified, the price of the contract modification for the additional 30 products is an
additional Rs. 28,500 or Rs. 950 per product. The pricing for the additional products reflects the stand-
alone selling price of the products at the time of the contract modification and the additional products are
distinct from the original products.
Accordingly, the contract modification for the additional 30 products is, in effect, a new and separate contract
for future products that does not affect the accounting for the existing contract and Rs. 950 per product for
the 30 products in the new contract.
QUESTION 141: (SIMILAR TO Nov’22 EXAM & MTP May’20, Exam May’24)
([Link].304 - Question Bank)
An entity enters into a contract for the sale of Product A for Rs. 1,000. As part of the contract, the entity gives
the customer a 40% discount voucher for any future purchases up to Rs. 1,000 in the next 30 days. The entity
intends to offer a 10% discount on all sales during the next 30 days as part of a seasonal promotion. The 10%
discount cannot be used in addition to the 40% discount voucher.
The entity believes there is 80% likelihood that a customer will redeem the voucher and on an average, a
customer will purchase Rs. 500 of additional products.
Determine how many performance obligations does the entity have and their stand-alone selling
price and allocated transaction price?
SOLUTION
Since all customers will receive a 10% discount on purchases during the next 30 days, the only additional
discount that provides the customer with a material right is the incremental discount of 30% on the
V'Smart Academy Page | 208
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
products purchased. The entity accounts for the promise to provide the incremental discount as a
separate performance obligation in the contract for the sale of Product A.
The entity believes there is 80% likelihood that a customer will redeem the voucher and, on an average, a
customer will purchase Rs. 500 of additional products. Consequently, the entity’s estimated stand-alone
selling price of the discount voucher is Rs. 120 (Rs. 500 average purchase price of additional products ×
30% incremental discount × 80% likelihood of exercising the option). The stand-alone selling prices of
Product A and the discount voucher and the resulting allocation of the Rs. 1,000 transaction price are as
follows:
Performance obligations Stand-alone selling
price
Product A Rs 1000
Discount voucher Rs 120
Total Rs 1120
The entity allocates Rs. 890 to Product A and recognises revenue for Product A when control transfers. The
entity allocates Rs. 110 to the discount voucher and recognises revenue for the voucher when the customer
redeems it for goods or services or when it expires.
QUESTION 142
([Link].314 - Question Bank)
VT Limited enters into a contract with a customer to sell equipment. Control of the equipment transfers to the
customer when the contract is signed. The price stated in the contract is Rs. 1 crore plus a 10% contractual
rate of interest, payable in 60 monthly instalments of Rs. 212,470. Determine the discounting rate and the
transaction price when
Case A—Contractual discount rate reflects the rate in a separate financing transaction
Case B—Contractual discount rate does not reflect the rate in a separate financing transaction i.e., 14%.
SOLUTION
Case A—Contractual discount rate reflects the rate in a separate financing transaction
In evaluating the discount rate in the contract that contains a significant financing component, VT Limited
observes that the 10% contractual rate of interest reflects the rate that would be used in a separate
financing transaction between the entity and its customer at contract inception (i.e., the contractual rate
of interest of 10% reflects the credit characteristics of the customer).
The market terms of the financing mean that the cash selling price of the equipment is Rs. 1 crore. This
amount is recognised as revenue and as a loan receivable when control of the equipment transfers to the
customer. The entity accounts for the receivable in accordance with Ind AS 109.
Case B—Contractual discount rate does not reflect the rate in a separate financing transaction
In evaluating the discount rate in the contract that contains a significant financing component, the entity
observes that the 10% contractual rate of interest is significantly lower than the 14% interest rate that
would be used in a separate financing transaction between the entity and its customer at contract inception
(i.e., the contractual rate of interest of 10% does not reflect the credit characteristics of the customer). This
suggests that the cash selling price is less than Rs. 1 crore.
VT Limited determines the transaction price by adjusting the promised amount of consideration to reflect
the contractual payments using the 14% interest rate that reflects the credit characteristics of the
customer. Consequently, the entity determines that the transaction price is Rs. 9,131,346 (60 monthly
payments of Rs. 212,470 discounted at 14%). The entity recognises revenue and a loan receivable for that
amount. The entity accounts for the loan receivable in accordance with Ind AS 109.
SOLUTION:
Journal Entries showing accounting for the significant financing component:
(a) Recognise a contract liability for the ₹ 4,000 payment received at contract inception:
Cash Dr. ₹ 4,000
To Contract liability ₹ 4,000
(b) During the two years from contract inception until the transfer of the asset, the entity adjusts the
promised amount of consideration and accretes the contract liability by recognising interest on ₹ 4,000 at
6% for two years:
Interest expense Dr. ₹ 494*
To Contract liability ₹ 494
* ₹ 494 = ₹ 4,000 contract liability × (6% interest per year for two years).
(e) How much revenue will the merchant recognize in the year 2019-2020, if 3,00,000 points are redeemed in
the year 2019-2020?
SOLUTION
a) Points earned on Rs. 10,00,000 @ 10 points on every Rs. 500 = [(10,00,000/500) x 10] = 20,000 points.
Value of points = 20,000 points x Rs. 0.5 each point = Rs. 10,000
Journal Entry
Rs Rs
Bank A/c Dr. 10,00,000
To Sales A/c 9,90,099
To Liability under Customer Loyalty programme 9,901
b) Points earned on Rs. 50,00,00,000 @ 10 points on every Rs. 500 = [(50,00,00,000/500) x 10] =
1,00,00,000 points.
Value of points = 1,00,00,000 points x Rs. 0.5 each point = Rs. 50,00,000
Total liability = 49,50,495 for 1,00,00,000 points. Out of this, 82,00,000 points will be redeemed in 17-18
and remaining 18,00,000 in 18-19 & 19-20.
As per company expectations, only 80% of remaining points will be redeemed .i.e. 80% x 18,00,000 =
14,40,000 points.
Therefore, the liability of 49,50,495 is actually for 96,40,000 points only (82,00,000 + 14,40,000) and not
1,00,00,000 points.
d) In 2018-2019, KK Ltd. would recognize revenue for discounting of 60% of outstanding points as follows:
Outstanding points = 18,00,000 x 60% = 10,80,000 points
Total points discounted till date = 82,00,000 + 10,80,000 = 92,80,000 points
Revenue to be recognized in the year 2018-2019 = [{49,50,495 x (92,80,000 / 96,40,000)} - 42,11,002]
= Rs. 5,54,620.
The Liability under Customer Loyalty programme at the end of the year 2018-2019 will be Rs. 7,39,493 –
5,54,620 = 1,84,873.
e) In the year 2019-2020, the merchant will recognize the balance revenue of Rs. 1,84,873 irrespective of
the points redeemed as this is the last year for redeeming the points. Journal entry will be as follows:
QUESTION 145: (RTP May’22, MTP Nov’22, MTP May’23, Exam May’23)
([Link].336 - Question Bank)
On 1st April, 20X1, S Limited enters into a contract with Corp Limited to construct heavy- duty equipment for
a promised consideration of Rs. 20,00,000 with a bonus of Rs. 2,50,000 if the equipment is completed within
24 months. At the inception of the contract, S Limited correctly accounts for the promised bundle of goods and
services as a single performance obligation in accordance with Ind AS 115. At the inception of the contract,
the Company expects the costs to be Rs. 11,00,000 and concludes that it is highly probable that a significant
reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognised will occur. Completion of the heavy-duty equipment
is highly susceptible to factors outside of the Company’s influence, mainly due to difficulties with the supply
of components.
At 31st March, 20X2, S Limited has satisfied 65% of its performance obligation on the basis of costs incurred
to date and concludes that the variable consideration is still constrained in accordance with Ind AS 115.
However, on 4 June 20X2, the contract is modified with the result that the fixed consideration and expected
costs increase by Rs. 1,50,000 and Rs. 80,000 respectively. The time allowable for achieving the bonus is
extended by six months with the result that S Limited concludes that it is highly probable that the bonus will
be achieved and that the contract remains a single performance obligation.
S Limited wants your opinion on the accounting treatment of contract with Corp Limited in light
of Ind AS 115, for the year 20X1-20X2 and 20X2-20X3.
ANSWER:
For the year 20X1-20X2
S Limited accounts for the promised bundle of goods and services as a single performance obligation
satisfied over time in accordance with Ind AS 115. At the inception of the contract, S Limited expects the
following:
Transaction price – Rs. 20,00,000
Expected costs – Rs. 11,00,000
Expected profit (45%) – Rs. 9,00,000
At contract inception, S Limited excludes the Rs. 2,50,000 bonus from the transaction price because it
cannot conclude that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue
recognised will not occur. Completion of the heavy-duty equipment is highly susceptible to factors outside
the entity’s influence.
V'Smart Academy Page | 212
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
By the end of the first year, the entity has satisfied 65% of its performance obligation on the basis of costs
incurred to date. Costs incurred to date are therefore Rs. 7,15,000 and S Limited reassesses the variable
consideration and concludes that the amount is still constrained. Therefore at 31st March, 20X2, the
following would be recognised:
QUESTION 146: (Nov’20 EXAM, MTP May’23, MTP Nov’23, MTP May’24)
([Link].337 - Question Bank)
ABC Limited supplies plastic buckets to wholesaler customers. As per the contract entered into between ABC
Limited and a customer for the financial year 2019-20, the price per plastic bucket will decrease retrospectively
as sales volume increases within the stipulated time of one year.
The price applicable for the entire sale will be based on the sales volume bracket during the year.
Price per unit (INR) Sales volume
90 0 — 10,000 units
80 10,001 —35,000 units
70 35,001 units & above
All transactions are made in cash.
(i) Suggest how revenue is to be recognised in the books of accounts of ABC Limited as per expected value
method, considering a probability of 15%, 75% and 10% for sales volumes of 9,000 units, 28,000 units and
36,000 units respectively. For workings, assume that ABC Limited achieved the same number of units of
sales to the customer during the year as initially estimated under expected value method for the financial
year 2019-20.
(ii) In case ABC Limited decides to measure revenue, based on the most likely method instead of expected
value method, how will the revenue be recognised in the books of accounts of ABC Limited based on above
available information? For workings, assume that ABC Limited achieved the same number of units of sales
to the customer during the year as initially estimated under most likely value method for the financial year
2019-20
You are required to pass Journal entries in the books of ABC Limited if the revenue is accounted for as per
expected value method for financial year 2019-20.
SOLUTION
i) Determination of how revenue is to be recognised in the books of ABC Ltd. as per expected value
method
Calculation of probability weighted sales volume
Sales volume Probability Probability-weighted sales volume
(units) (units)
9,000 15% 1,350
28,000 75% 21,000
36,000 10% 3,600
25,950
Revenue is recognised at ₨. 79.13 for each unit sold. First 10,000 units sold will be booked at ₨.90 per
unit and liability is accrued for the difference price of ₨. 10.87 per unit (₨. 90 – ₨. 79.13), which will be
reversed upon subsequent sales of 15,950 units (as the question states that ABC Ltd. achieved the same
number of units of sales to the customer during the year as initially estimated under the expected value
method for the financial year 2019-2020). For, subsequent sale of 15,950 units, contract liability is accrued
at ₨. 0.87 (80 – 79.13) per unit and revenue will be deferred.
(ii) Determination of how revenue is to be recognised in the books of ABC Ltd. as per most likely
method
Note: It is assumed that the sales volume of 28,000 units given under the expected value method,
with highest probability is the sales estimated under the most likely method too.
Transaction price will be:
28,000 units x ₨. 80 per unit = ₨. 22,40,000
Average unit price applicable = ₨. 80
First 10,000 units sold will be booked at ₨. 90 per unit and liability of ₨. 1,00,000 is accrued for the
difference price of ₨. 10 per unit (₨. 90 – ₨. 80), which will be reversed upon subsequent sales of 18,000
units (as question states that ABC Ltd. achieved the same number of units of sales to the customer during
the year as initially estimated under the most likely method for the financial year 2019-2020).
Note: Alternatively, the question may be solved based on 25,950 units (as calculated under expected value
method assuming that the targets were met) as follows:
Transaction price will be:
25,950 units x ₨. 80 per unit = ₨. 20,76,000
Average unit price applicable = ₨. 80.
First 10,000 units sold will be booked at ₨. 90 per unit and liability is accrued for the difference price of
₨.10 per unit (₨. 90 – ₨. 80), which will be reversed upon subsequent sales of 15,950 units.
Rs Rs
1. Bank A/c (10,000 x ₨. 90) 9,00,000
Dr.
Alternatively, in place of first two entries, one consolidated entry may be passed as follows:
The entity enters into a contract with a customer to sell Products X, Y and Z as described in Case A. The
contract also includes a promise to transfer Product Alpha. Total consideration in the contract is Rs. 130,000.
The stand-alone selling price for Product Alpha is highly variable because the entity sells Product Alpha to
different customers for a broad range of amounts (Rs. 15,000 – Rs. 45,000). Determine the stand-alone selling
price of Products, X, Y, Z and Alpha using the residual approach.
SOLUTION
Case A—Allocating a discount to one or more performance obligations
The contract includes a discount of Rs. 20,000 on the overall transaction, which would be allocated
proportionately to all three performance obligations when allocating the transaction price using the relative
stand-alone selling price method.
However, because the entity regularly sells Products Y and Z together for Rs. 50,000 and Product X for Rs.
50,000, it has evidence that the entire discount should be allocated to the promises to transfer Products Y
and Z in accordance with paragraph 82 of Ind AS 115.
If the entity transfers control of Products Y and Z at the same point in time, then the entity could,
as a practical matter, account for the transfer of those products as a single performance obligation. That
is, the entity could allocate Rs. 50,000 of the transaction price to the single performance obligation and
recognise revenue of Rs. 50,000 when Products Y and Z simultaneously transfer to the customer.
If the contract requires the entity to transfer control of Products Y and Z at different points in time,
then the allocated amount of Rs. 50,000 is individually allocated to the promises to transfer Product Y
(stand-alone selling price of Rs. 25,000) and Product Z (stand-alone selling price of Rs. 45,000) as follows:
Product Allocated transaction price
Rs
Product Y 17,857 (Rs. 25,000 ÷ Rs. 70,000 total stand-alone selling price
× Rs. 50,000)
Product Z 32,143 (Rs. 45,000 ÷ Rs. 70,000 total stand-alone selling price
× Rs. 50,000)
Total 50,000
As in Case A, because the entity regularly sells Products Y and Z together for Rs. 50,000 and Product X for
Rs. 50,000, it has observable evidence that Rs. 100,000 should be allocated to those three products and a
Rs. 20,000 discounts should be allocated to the promises to transfer Products Y and Z in accordance with
paragraph 82 of Ind AS 115.
Using the residual approach, the entity estimates the stand-alone selling price of Product Alpha to be Rs.
30,000 as follows:
Product Stand-alone selling price Method
Rs
Product X 50,000 Directly observable
Products Y & Z 50,000 Directly observable with discount
Product Alpha 30,000 Residual approach
Total 130,000
The entity observes that the resulting Rs30,000 allocated to Product Alpha is within the range of its
observable selling prices (Rs. 15,000 – Rs. 45,000).
SOLUTION:
Case A — Variable consideration allocated entirely to one performance obligation
To allocate the transaction price, the entity considers the criteria in paragraph 85 and concludes that the
variable consideration (i.e. the sales-based royalties) should be allocated entirely to Licence B. The entity
concludes that the criteria are met for the following reasons:
(a) The variable payment relates specifically to an outcome from the performance obligation to transfer
Licence B (i.e. the customer's subsequent sales of products that use Licence B).
(b) Allocating the expected royalty amounts of ₹ 2,000,000 entirely to Licence B is consistent with the
allocation objective in paragraph 73 of Ind AS 115. This is because the entity's estimate of the amount of
sales-based royalties (₹ 2,000,000) approximates the stand-alone selling price of Licence B and the fixed
amount of ₹ 1,600,000 approximates the stand-alone selling price of Licence A. The entity allocates ₹
1,600,000 to Licence A. This is because, based on an assessment of the facts and circumstances relating
to both licences, allocating to Licence B some of the fixed consideration in addition to all of the variable
consideration would not meet the allocation objective in paragraph 73 of Ind AS 115.
The entity transfers Licence B at inception of the contract and transfers Licence A one month later. Upon
the transfer of Licence B, the entity does not recognise revenue because the consideration allocated to
Licence B is in the form of a sales-based royalty. Therefore, the entity recognises revenue for the sales-
based royalty when those subsequent sales occur.
When Licence A is transferred, the entity recognises as revenue the ₹ 1,600,000 allocated to Licence A.
To allocate the transaction price, the entity applies the criteria in paragraph 85 of Ind AS 115 to determine
whether to allocate the variable consideration (i.e. the sales-based royalties) entirely to Licence B.
In applying the criteria, the entity concludes that even though the variable payments relate specifically to
an outcome from the performance obligation to transfer Licence B (i.e. the customer's subsequent sales of
products that use Licence B), allocating the variable consideration entirely to Licence B would be
inconsistent with the principle for allocating the transaction price. Allocating ₹ 600,000 to Licence A and ₹
3,000,000 to Licence B does not reflect a reasonable allocation of the transaction price on the basis of the
stand-alone selling prices of Licences A and B of ₹ 1,600,000 and ₹ 2,000,000, respectively. Consequently,
the entity applies the general allocation requirements of Ind AS 115.
The entity allocates the transaction price of ₹ 600,000 to Licences A and B on the basis of relative stand-
alone selling prices of ₹ 1,600,000 and ₹ 2,000,000, respectively. The entity also allocates the consideration
related to the sales-based royalty on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. However, when an entity
licenses intellectual property in which the consideration is in the form of a sales-based royalty, the entity
cannot recognise revenue until the later of the following events: the subsequent sales occur or the
performance obligation is satisfied (or partially satisfied).
Licence B is transferred to the customer at the inception of the contract and Licence A is transferred three
months later. When Licence B is transferred, the entity recognises as revenue ₹ 333,333 [(₹ 2,000,000 ÷ ₹
3,600,000) × ₹ 600,000] allocated to Licence B. When Licence A is transferred, the entity recognises as
revenue ₹ 266,667 [(₹ 1,600,000 ÷ ₹ 3,600,000) × ₹ 600,000] allocated to Licence A.
In the first month, the royalty due from the customer's first month of sales is ₹ 400,000. Consequently,
the entity recognises as revenue ₹ 222,222 (₹ 2,000,000 ÷ ₹ 3,600,000 × ₹ 400,000) allocated to Licence B
(which has been transferred to the customer and is therefore a satisfied performance obligation). The entity
recognises a contract liability for the ₹ 177,778 (₹ 1,600,000 ÷ ₹ 3,600,000 × ₹ 400,000) allocated to Licence
A. This is because although the subsequent sale by the entity's customer has occurred, the performance
obligation to which the royalty has been allocated has not been satisfied.
The entity has extensive experience creating products that meet the specific performance criteria. Based on its
experience, the entity has identified five engineering alternatives that will achieve the 10 percent incentive and
two that will achieve the 25 percent incentive. In this case, the entity determined that it has 95 percent
confidence that it will achieve the 10 percent incentive and 20 percent confidence that it will achieve the 25
percent incentive.
Based on this analysis, the entity believes 10 percent to be the most likely amount when estimating the
transaction price. Therefore, the entity includes only the 10 percent award in the transaction price when
calculating revenue because the entity has concluded it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of
cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration
is subsequently resolved due to its 95 percent confidence in achieving the 10 percent award.
The entity reassesses its production status quarterly to determine whether it is on track to meet the criteria for
the incentive award. At the end of the year four, it becomes apparent that this contract will fully achieve the
weight-based criterion. Therefore, the entity revises its estimate of variable consideration to include the entire
25 percent incentive fee in the year four because, at this point, it is probable that a significant reversal in the
amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when including the entire variable consideration in the
transaction price.
Evaluate the impact of changes in variable consideration when cost incurred is as follows:
Year ₹
V'Smart Academy Page | 218
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
1 50,000
2 1,75,000
3 4,00,000
4 2,75,000
5 50,000
SOLUTION
Note: For simplification purposes, the table calculates revenue for the year independently based on costs
incurred during the year divided by total expected costs, with the assumption that total expected costs do
not change.
Fixed consideration A 1,000,000
Estimated costs to complete* B 950,000
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Total estimated variable consideration C 100,000 100,000 100,000 250,000 250,000
Fixed revenue D=A x H/B 52,632 184,211 421,053 289,474 52,632
Variable revenue E=C x H/B 5,263 18,421 42,105 72,368 13,158
Cumulative revenue adjustment F (see below) - - - 99,370 -
Total revenue G=D+E+F 57,895 202,632 463,158 461,212 65,790
Costs H 50,000 175,000 400,000 275,000 50,000
Operating profit I=G–H 7,895 27,632 63,158 186,212 15,790
Margin (rounded off) J=I/G 14% 14% 14% 40% 24%
* For simplicity, it is assumed there is no change to the estimated costs to complete throughout the contract
period.
* In practice, under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, total revenue for each period is determined by
multiplying the total transaction price (fixed and variable) by the ratio of cumulative cost incurred to total
estimated costs to complete, less revenue recognized to date.
(ii) Calculate the amount of revenue which A Ltd. must allocate to each component of the transaction;
(iii) Prepare journal entries to record the information set out above in the books of accounts of A Ltd. for the
years ended 31st March·2019 and 31st March 2020; and
(iv) Draft an extract showing how revenue could be presented and disclosed in the financial statements of A
Ltd. for the year ended 31st March 2019 and 31st March 2020.
SOLUTION
(i) As per Ind AS 115, a good or service that is promised to customer is distinct if both of the
following criteria are met:
a) The customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources
that are readily available to them. A readily available resource is a good or service that is sold
separately (by the entity or another entity) or that the customer has already obtained from the entity
or from other transactions or events; and
b) The entity’s promise to transfer the goods or service to the customer is separately identifiable from
other promises in the contract.
Factors that indicate two or more promise to transfer goods or services to a customer are separately
identifiable include, but are not limited to, the following:
a) Significant integration services are not provided (i.e. the entity is not using the goods or services
as inputs to produce or deliver the combined output called for in the contract)
b) The goods or services do not significantly modify or customize other promised goods or services
in the contract.
c) The goods or services are not highly inter–dependent or highly interrelated with other promised
goods or services in the contract.
Accordingly, on 1st April, 2018, entity A entered into a single transaction with three identifiable
separate components:
1. Sale of goods (i.e. engineering machine);
2. Rendering of services (i.e. engineering machine maintenance service on 30th September, 2018
and 1st April, 2019); and
3. Providing finance (i.e. sale of engineering machine and rendering of services on extended period
credit)
(iv) Extract of Notes to the financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 2019 and 31st
March 2020
2019-2020 2018-2019
Rs. Rs.
Sale of goods - 2,51,927
Rendering of machine- maintenance services 75,000 45,000
Finance income (12,596 + 15,477) - 28,073
75,000 3,25,000
SOLUTION
To determine whether the entity’s performance obligation is to provide the specified goods or services itself
(i.e. the entity is a principal) or to arrange for another party to provide those goods or services (i.e. the entity
is an agent), the entity considers the nature of its promise. The entity determines that its promise is to
provide the customer with a ticket, which provides the right to enter the particular amusement park on a
particular date. The entity considers the following indicators for assessment as principal or agent under the
contract with the customers:
a) the entity is primarily responsible for fulfilling the contract, which is providing the right to enter the
amusement part. However, the entity is not responsible for providing the services in amusement
park, which will be provided by the amusement park owner.
V'Smart Academy Page | 221
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
b) the entity has inventory risk for the tickets because they are purchased before they are sold to the
entity’s customers and the entity is exposed to any loss as a result of not being able to sell the tickets
for more than the entity’s cost.
c) the entity has discretion in setting the sales prices for tickets to its customers.
The entity i.e. XYZ Limited concludes that its promise is to provide a ticket (i.e. a right to enter the
amusement park on a particular date) for the customer. On the basis of the indicators, the entity concludes
that it controls the ticket before it is transferred to the customer. Thus, the entity concludes that it is a
principal in the transaction and recognises revenue in the gross amount of consideration to which it is
entitled in exchange for the tickets transferred.
QUESTION 152
([Link].803 - Question Bank)
Sports Team D enters into a three-year agreement to license its team name and logo to Apparel Maker M. The
license permits M to use the team name and logo on its products, including display products, and in its
advertising or marketing materials.
(i) Determine the nature of license in the above case.
(ii) Modifying above facts that, Sports Team D has not played games in many years and the licensor is Brand
Collector B, an entity that acquires IP such as old team or brand names and logos from defunct entities or
those in financial distress. B’s business model is to license the IP, or obtain settlements from entities that
use the IP without permission, without undertaking any ongoing activities to promote or support the IP
Would the answer be different in this situation?
SOLUTION:
(i) The nature of D’s promise in this contract is to provide M with the right to access the sports team’s IP
and, accordingly, revenue from the license will be recognised over time. In reaching this conclusion,
D considers all of the following facts:
- M reasonably expects D to continue to undertake activities that support and maintain the value of
the team name and logo by continuing to play games and field a competitive team throughout the
license period. These activities significantly affect the IP’s ability to provide benefit to M because the
value of the team name and logo is substantially derived from, or dependent on, those ongoing
activities.
- The activities directly expose M to positive or negative effects (i.e., whether D plays games and fields
a competitive team will have a direct effect on how successful M is in selling its products featuring
the team’s name and logo).
- D’s ongoing activities do not result in the transfer of a good or a service to M as they occur (i.e., the
team playing games does not transfer a good or service to M).
(ii) Based on B’s customary business practices, Apparel Maker M probably does not reasonably expect B to
undertake any activities to change the form of the IP or to support or maintain the IP. Therefore, B
would probably conclude that the nature of its promise is to provide M with a right to use its IP as it
exists at the point in time at which the license is granted.
SOLUTION
(i) Here the operator has a contractual right to receive cash from the grantor. The grantor has little, if
any, discretion to avoid payment, usually because the agreement is enforceable by law. The operator
has an unconditional right to receive cash if the grantor contractually guarantees to pay the operator.
Hence, operator recognizes a financial asset to the extent it has a contractual right to receive cash.
(ii) Here the operator has a contractual right to charge users of the public services. A right to charge users
of the public service is not an unconditional right to receive cash because the amounts are contingent
on the extent that the public uses the service. Therefore, the operator shall recognise an intangible
asset to the extent it receives a right (a license) to charge users of the public service.
(iii) Accounting treatment for preparation of financial statements
Note: Amount in entry 4 is kept blank as no information in this regard is given in the question.
SOLUTION
Extracts of Balance Sheet of Nivaan Ltd. as on 31stMarch, 2019
Rs in lakh
Current Assets
Contract Assets- Work-in-progress (Refer W.N. 3) 9.0
Current Liabilities
Contract Liabilities (Advance from customers) (Refer W.N. 2) 4.5
Working Notes:
1. Table showing calculation of total revenue, expenses and profit or loss on contract for the year
Rs in lakh
A & Co. B & Co. Total
Revenue from contracts (40 x 30%) = 12 (30 x 20%) = 6 18
Expenses due for the year (34 x 30%) = 10.2 (24 x 20%) = 4.8 15
Profit or loss on contract 1.8 1.2 3
3. Work in Progress recognised as part of contract asset at the end of the year
Rs in lakh
A & Co. B & Co. Total
Total actual cost incurred during the year 16 8 24
Less: Cost recognised in the books for the year 31.3.2019 (10.2) (4.8) (15)
Work-in-progress recognised at the end of the year 5.8 3.2 9.0
Alternate Answer -
Additional rectification cost of Rs 2 lakh has been treated as normal cost. Hence total expected cost has
been considered as Rs 34 lakh. However, in case this Rs. 2 lakh is treated as an abnormal cost, then
expense due for the year would be Rs. 11.6 lakh (i.e. 30% of Rs. 32 lakh + Rs. 2 lakh). Accordingly, with
respect to A & Co., the profit for the year would be Rs. 0.4 lakh and work-in-progress recognised at the
end of the year would be Rs. 4.4 lakh.
Working Notes:
1. Table showing calculation of total revenue, expenses and profit or loss on contract for the year
Rs in lakhs
A & Co. B & Co. Total
Revenue from contracts 12 6 18
Expenses due for the year 11.60 4.80 16.40
Profit or loss on contract 0.40 1.20 1.60
2. Work in Progress recognised as part of contract asset at the end of the year
Rs in lakhs
A & Co. B & Co. Total
Total actual cost incurred during the year 16 8 24
Less: Cost recognised in the books for the year 31.3.2019 (11.60) (4.80) (16.40)
Work-in-progress recognised at the end of the year 4.40 3.2 7.60
QUESTION 155
On 1st April, 20X1, Entity X enters into a contract with Entity Y to sell mobile chargers for Rs. 100 per
charger. As per the terms of the contract, if Entity Y purchases more than 1,000 chargers till March 20X2,
the price per charger will be retrospectively reduced to Rs. 90 per unit. Till September 20X1, Entity X sold
95 chargers to Entity Y. Entity X estimates that Entity Y's purchases by March 20X2 will not exceed the
required threshold of 1,000 chargers.
In October 20X1, Entity Y acquires another Entity C and from October 20X1 to December 20X1, Entity X
sells an additional 600 chargers to Entity Y. Due to these developments, Entity X estimates that purchases
of Entity Y will exceed the 1,000 chargers threshold for the period and therefore, it will be required to
retrospectively reduce the price per charger to Rs. 90.
Analyse the above scenario in light of Ind AS 115 and state how the revenue should be recognised in such
a situation.
Answers
Paragraph 56 of Ind AS 115 states that an entity shall include in the transaction price some or all of an
amount of variable consideration estimated in accordance with paragraph 53 only to the extent that it is
highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognised will not occur
when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
Further, paragraph 57 of Ind AS 115 state that in assessing whether it is highly probable that a significant
reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognised will not occur once the uncertainty related to the
variable consideration is subsequently resolved, an entity shall consider both the likelihood and the
magnitude of the revenue reversal. Factors that could increase the likelihood or the magnitude of a revenue
reversal include, but are not limited to, any of the following:
(a) the amount of consideration is highly susceptible to factors outside the entity’s influence. Those factors
may include volatility in a market, the judgement or actions of third parties, weather conditions and
a high risk of obsolescence of the promised good or service.
(b) the uncertainty about the amount of consideration is not expected to be resolved for a long period of
time.
(c) the entity’s experience (or other evidence) with similar types of contracts is limited, or that experience
(or other evidence) has limited predictive value.
(d) the entity has a practice of either offering a broad range of price concessions or changing the payment
terms and conditions of similar contracts in similar circumstances.
(e) the contract has a large number and broad range of possible consideration amounts.
Entity X estimates that the consideration in the above contract is variable. Therefore, in accordance with
paragraphs 56 and 57 of Ind AS 115, Entity X is required to consider the constraints in estimating variable
consideration. Entity X determines that it has significant experience with this product and with the
purchasing pattern of Entity Y. Thus, if Entity X concludes that it is highly probable that a significant
reversal in the cumulative amount of revenue recognised (i.e. Rs. 100 per unit) will not occur when the
uncertainty is resolved (i.e. when the total amount of purchases is known), then the Entity X will recognise
revenue of Rs. 9,500 (95 chargers x Rs. 100 per charger) for the half year ended 30th September, 20X1.
Further, paragraphs 87 and 88 of Ind AS 115 that after contract inception, the transaction price can change
for various reasons, including the resolution of uncertain events or other changes in circumstances that
change the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for the promised
goods or services.
An entity shall allocate to the performance obligations in the contract any subsequent changes in the
transaction price on the same basis as at contract inception. Consequently, an entity shall not reallocate
the transaction price to reflect changes in stand-alone selling prices after contract inception. Amounts
allocated to a satisfied performance obligation shall be recognised as revenue, or as a reduction of revenue,
in the period in which the transaction price changes.”
In accordance with the above, in the month of October 20X1, due to change in circumstances on account of
Entity Y acquiring Entity C and consequential increase in sale of chargers to Entity Y, Entity X estimates
that Entity Y's purchases will exceed the 1,000 chargers threshold till March 20X2 for the period and
therefore, it will be required to retrospectively reduce the price per charger to Rs. 90.
Consequently, the Entity X will recognise revenue of Rs. 53,050 for the quarter ended December 20X1 which
is calculated as follows:
TOPIC – 30
IND AS 116 - LEASES
QUESTION 156: (Exam Nov’23)
([Link].137 - Question Bank)
A consumer products entity, Entity A Limited (lessee) enters into a lease agreement with Entity B Limited
(lessor) for a dedicated production line to manufacture one of its store - brand household products for a
period of three years. Entity A Limited has agreed to order a minimum 1,00,000 units per month and to
make a payment to Entity B Limited as per the following agreed rates:
(i) ₹ 240 per unit if the ordered quantity is between 1 ,00,000 to 1,20,000 units;
(ii) ₹ 246 per unit if the ordered quantity is between 1,20,001 to 1,50,000 units.
As per the terms of the agreement, Entity A Limited has the exclusive right to use the production line. Entity
B Limited cannot use the specified production line for any other customer. The type of household product is
specified in the contract. Entity A Limited issues instructions to Entity B about the quantity and timing of
products to be delivered. If the production line is not producing the household product for Entity A, it remains
idle. Entity B Limited operates and maintains the production line on a daily basis. Entity A Limited has
estimated that for manufacturing each unit, Entity B Limited incurs an average cost of ₹ 195. Further, the
observable stand-alone price for the rent of the production line is ₹ 60,00,000 per month. Entity A Limited's
incremental borrowing rate at the commencement date of the lease is 10% per annum.
Entity A Limited concludes that the arrangement contains a lease as per Ind AS 116. It also elects not to
apply the practical expedient in paragraph 15 of Ind AS 116 of not to separate the non-lease component(s)
from the lease component(s). Accordingly, it separates non-lease components from lease components.
You are required to:
(i) Analyse the above and identify lease component(s) and non-lease component(s);
And at the commencement of the lease:
(ii) Compute and allocate the consideration into lease component(s) & non-lease component(s);
(iii) Compute the lease liability (the present value factor @ 10% per annum of 2.49 for 3 years may be
adopted);
Determine the recognition / treatment of lease component(s) and non-lease component(s).
SOLUTION
(i) and (ii) Identification of lease and non-lease components and allocation of consideration into these
components
In the given case, the agreement contains a lease component (production line) and a non-lease component
(job work). As Entity A has not elected to apply the practical expedient as provided in paragraph 15 of Ind
AS 116, it will separate the lease and non-lease components and allocate the total consideration to the
lease and non- lease components in the ratio of their relative stand-alone selling prices.
As Entity A is required to purchase a minimum of 1,00,000 units per month at the rate of ₹ 240 per unit,
there is in substance fixed payment of ₹ 2,40,00,000 per month – although the payments are structured
as variable lease payments, there is no genuine variability in those payments as Entity A is required to
purchase a minimum quantity 1,00,000 units per month, i.e., for ₹ 2,40,00,000 per month.
The observable stand-alone price for lease component (which is factory rent) is ₹ 60,00,000. The observable
stand-alone price of non-lease component (which is job work charges) is ₹ 1,95,00,000 (₹ 195 x 1,00,000
units).
Entity A is required to allocate the total consideration per month as follows:
Observable standalone price: Lease component ₹ 60,00,000
Total ₹ 2,55,00,000
Lease component as a percentage of observable prices 23.53%
(₹ 60 lakh / ₹ 255 lakh) x 100
(₹ 2,40,00,000 x 23.53%)
Non-lease component (₹ 2,40,00,000 – ₹ 56,47,200) ₹ 1,83,52,800
(iii) Computation of lease liability
The total allocation for a year will be ₹ 6,77,66,400 (₹ 56,47,200 x 12)
As Entity A's incremental borrowing rate is 10%, it discounts lease payments using this rate and
the lease liability at the commencement date is calculated as follows:
Lease Liability at commencement date = ₹ 6,77,66,400 x 2.49 = ₹ 16,87,38,336.
(iv) Accounting treatment of lease components and non-lease components
(a) Entity A recognises lease liability amounting to ₹ 16,87,38,336 as at commencement date
based on lease payments amounting to ₹ 56,47,200 per month.
(b) The remaining amount of ₹ 1,83,52,800 (₹ 2,40,00,000 – ₹ 56,47,200) which is attributable to
job work charges is recognised in the statement of profit and loss as and when incurred.
QUESTION 157:
([Link].205 - Question Bank)
Company EFG enters into a property lease with Entity H. The initial term of the lease is 10 years with a 5-
year renewal option. The economic life of the property is 40 years and the fair value of the leased property is
Rs50 Lacs. Company EFG has an option to purchase the property at the end of the lease term for Rs30 lacs.
The first annual payment is Rs5 lacs with an increase of 3% every year thereafter. The implicit rate of interest
is 9.04%. Entity H gives Company EFG an incentive of Rs2 lacs (payable at the beginning of year 2), which is
to be used for normal tenant improvement.
Company EFG is reasonably certain to exercise that purchase option. How would EFG measure the right-of-
use asset and lease liability over the lease term?
SOLUTION:
As per Ind AS 116, Company EFG would first calculate the lease liability as the present value of the annual
lease payments, less the lease incentive paid in year 2, plus the exercise price of the purchase option using
the rate implicit in the lease of approximately 9.04%.
PV of lease payments, less lease incentive (W.N. 1) Rs. 37,39,648
PV of purchase option at end of lease term (W.N. 2) Rs. 12,60,000
Total lease liability Rs. 49,99,648 or Rs. 50,00,000
(approx)
The right-of-use asset is equal to the lease liability because there is no adjustment required for initial direct
costs incurred by Company EFG, lease payments made at or before the lease commencement date, or lease
incentives received prior to the lease commencement date.
Entity EFG would record the following journal entry on the lease commencement date.
Right-of-use Asset Dr. Rs 50,00,000
To Lease Liability Rs 50,00,000
To record ROU asset and lease liability at the commencement date.
Since the purchase option is reasonably certain to be exercised, EFG would amortize the right-of-use asset
over the economic life of the underlying asset (40 years). Annual amortization expense would be Rs.
1,25,000 (Rs. 50,00,000 / 40 years)
Interest expense on the lease liability would be calculated as shown in the following table. This table
includes all expected cash flows during the lease term; including the lease incentive paid by Entity H and
Company EFG’s purchase option.
Although the lease was for 10 years, the asset had an economic life of 40 years. When Company EFG
exercises its purchase option at the end of the 10-year lease, it would have fully extinguished its lease
liability but continue depreciating the asset over the remaining useful life.
Working Notes
1. Calculating PV of lease payments, less lease incentive:
Year Lease Present value Present value of
Payment (A) factor @ 9.04% (B) lease payments
(A*B=C)
Year 1 5,00,000 1 5,00,000
Year 2 3,15,000 0.92 2,89,800
Year 3 5,30,450 0.84 4,45,578
Year 4 5,46,364 0.77 4,20,700
Year 5 5,62,754 0.71 3,99,555
Year 6 5,79,637 0.65 3,76,764
Year 7 5,97,026 0.59 3,52,245
Year 8 6,14,937 0.55 3,38,215
Year 9 6,33,385 0.50 3,16,693
Year 6,52,387 0.46 3,00,098
10
Total 37,39,648
The discount rate for year 10 is different in the above calculations because in the earlier one its beginning
of year 10 and in the later one its end of the year 10.
QUESTION 158:
([Link].206 - Question Bank)
Entity W entered into a contract for lease of retail store with Entity J on January 01/01/2017. The initial term
of the lease is 5 years with a renewal option of further 3 years. The annual payments for initial term and
renewal term isRs100,000 and Rs110,000 respectively. The annual lease payment will increase based on the
annual increase in the CPI at the end of the preceding year. For example, the payment due on 01/01/18 will
be based on the CPI available at 31/12/17.
Entity W’s incremental borrowing rate at the lease inception date and as at 01/01/2020 is 5% and 6%
respectively and the CPI at lease commencement date and as at 01/01/2020 is 120 and 125 respectively.
At the lease commencement date, Entity W did not have a significant economic incentive to exercise the renewal
option. In the first quarter of 2020, Entity W installed unique lease improvements into the retail store with an
estimated five-year economic life. Entity W determined that it would only recover the cost of the improvements
if it exercises the renewal option, creating a significant economic incentive to extend.
Is Entity W required to remeasure the lease in the first quarter of 2020?
SOLUTION:
Since Entity W is now reasonably certain that it will exercise its renewal option, it is required to remeasure
the lease in the first quarter of 2020.
The following table summarizes information pertinent to the lease remeasurement.
Year 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Lease payment 104,167 104,167 114,583 114,583 114,583 552,083
Discount 1 0.943 0.890 0.840 0.792
Present value 104,167 98,230 101,979 96,250 90,750 491,376
To calculate the adjustment to the lease liability, Entity W would compare the recalculated and original
lease liability balances on the remeasurement date.
Revised lease liability 491,376
Original lease liability (1,95,244)
2,96,132
Entity W would record the following journal entry to adjust the lease liability.
ROU Asset Dr. 2,96,132
To Lease liability 2,96,132
Being lease liability and ROU asset adjusted on account of remeasurement.
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of ROU asset before the date of remeasurement
Year Lease Present value Present value of lease
beginning Payment(A) factor @ 5%(B) payments(AxB=C)
1 1,00,000 1.000 1,00,000
2 1,00,000 0.952 95,200
3 1,00,000 0.907 90,700
4 1,00,000 0.864 86,400
5 1,00,000 0.823 82,300
Lease liability as at commencement date 4,54,600
Year Lease Payments Present Value Present Value of Conversion INR value
(USD) factor @ 5% Lease Payment rate (spot
rate)
1 10,000 0.952 9,520 68 6,47,360
2 10,000 0.907 9,070 68 6,16,760
3 10,000 0.864 8,640 68 5,87,520
4 10,000 0.823 8,230 68 5,59,640
5 10,000 0.784 7,840 68 5,33,120
Total 43,300 29,44,400
As per Ind AS 21, the Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, monetary assets and liabilities are
restated at each reporting date at the closing rate and the difference due to foreign exchange movement is
recognised in profit and loss whereas non-monetary assets and liabilities carried measured in terms of
historical cost in foreign currency are not restated.
Accordingly, the ROU asset in the given case being a non-monetary asset measured in terms of historical
cost in foreign currency will not be restated but the lease liability being a monetary liability will be restated
at each reporting date with the resultant difference being taken to profit and loss.
At the end of Year 1, the lease liability will be measured in terms of USD as under:
Lease Liability:
Year Initial Value Lease Payment Interest @ 5% Closing Value (USD)
(USD) (a) (b) (c) = (a x 5%) (d = a + c - b)
1 43,300 10,000 2,165 35,465
Interest at the rate of 5% will be accounted for in profit and loss at average rate of ₹ 69
(i.e., USD 2,165 x 69) = ₹ 1,49,385.
Lease payment would be accounted for at the reporting date exchange rate, i.e. ₹ 70 at the end of year 1
Particulars Dr. (₹) Cr. (₹)
Lease liability Dr. 7,00,000
To Cash 7,00,000
As per the guidance above under Ind AS 21, the lease liability will be restated using the reporting date
exchange rate i.e., ₹ 70 at the end of Year 1. Accordingly, the lease liability will be measured at ₹ 24,82,550
(35,465 x ₹ 70) with the corresponding impact due to exchange rate movement of ₹ 88,765 (24,82,550 –
(29,44,400 + 1,49,385 – 700,000) taken to profit and loss.
(iii) The cost per soap will be calculated for each year in advance based on the budgeted number of soaps
to be produced each year. An amount of Rs. 1,74,015 shall be considered each year for the cost of
machine for year 1 to year 8 while calculating the cost per soap. Any differential under absorbed amount
shall be paid by the Company to M/s. Radhey at the end of that year. A charge of Rs. 1,74,015 per
annum for the machine is derived using borrowing cost of 8% p.a. For year 9 and year 10, only variable
cost and margins will be paid.
(iv) M/s. Radhey does not have any right to terminate the contract but the Company has the right to
terminate the contract at the end of each year. However, if the Company terminates the contract, it has
to compensate M/s. Radhey for any unabsorbed cost of Machine. For example, if the Company
terminates the contract at the end of second year then it has to pay Rs. 10,44,090 (i.e. 1,74,015 per
year x 6 remaining years). If it terminates the contract after the 8th year then the Company does not
have to pay the compensation since the cost of the machine would have been absorbed.
(v) In the first year, the Company purchases 5,50,000 soaps at Rs. 4.75 per soap.
Evaluate the contract of the Company with M/s. Radhey and provide necessary accounting entries for first
year in accordance with Ind AS with working notes. Assume all cash flows occur at the end of the year.
SOLUTION
Identification of the contract (by applying para 9 of Ind AS 116)
(a) Identified asset
Feel Fresh Ltd. (a customer company) enters into a long-term purchase contract with M/s Radhey (a
manufacturer) to purchase a particular type and quality of soaps for 10 year period.
V'Smart Academy Page | 232
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
Since for the purpose of the contract M/s Radhey has to buy a customized machine as per the
directions of Feel Fresh Ltd. and also the machine cannot be used for any other type of soap, the
machine is an identified asset.
(b) Right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset throughout the
period of use
Since the machine cannot be used for manufacture of soap for any other buyer, Feel Fresh Ltd. will
obtain substantially all the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the period of use.
(c) Right to direct the use
Feel Fresh Ltd. controls the use of machine and directs the terms and conditions of the contract with
respect to recovery of fixed expenses related to machine.
Hence the contract contains a lease.
Lease term
The lease term shall be 10 years assuming reasonable certainty. Though the lessee is not contractually
bound till 10th year, i.e., the lessee can refuse to make payment anytime without lessor’s permission
but, it is assumed that the lessee is reasonably certain that it will not exercise this option to terminate.
Identification of lease payment
Lease payments are defined as payments made by a lessee to a lessor relating to the right to use an
underlying asset during the lease term, comprising the following:
(a) fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments), less any lease incentives
(b) variable lease paym
(c) ents that depend on an index or a rate
(d) the exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option
(e) payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising an
option to terminate the lease
Here in-substance fixed payments in the given lease contract are Rs. 1,74,015 p.a. The present value
of lease payment which would be recovered in 8 years @ 8% would be Rs. 10,00,000 (approx.)
Variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or rate and are not, in substance, fixed are
not included as lease payments. Instead, they are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which
the event that triggers the payment occurs (unless they are included in the carrying amount of another
asset in accordance with other Ind AS).
Hence, lease liability will be recognized by Rs. 10,00,000 in the books of Feel Fresh Ltd. Since there
are no payments made to lessor before commencement date less lease incentives received from lessor
or initial direct costs incurred by lessee or estimate of costs for restoration / dismantling of underlying
asset, the right of use asset is equal to lease liability.
Journal Entries
On initial recognition
ROU Asset Dr. 10,00,000
To Lease Liability 10,00,000
To initially recognise the Lease Liability and the corresponding ROU Asset
*(refer note 1)
At the effective date of the modification (at the beginning of Year 6), Lessee remeasures the lease liability
based on:
(a) a five-year remaining lease term,
(b) annual payments of Rs. 30,000 and
(c) Lessee’s incremental borrowing rate of 5% p.a.
Year Lease Present value factor Present value of
Payment(A) @ 5% (B) lease payments (A x
B = C)
6 30,000 0.952 28,560
7 30,000 0.907 27,210
8 30,000 0.864 25,920
9 30,000 0.823 24,690
10 30,000 0.784 23,520
Total 1,29,900
Lessee determines the proportionate decrease in the carrying amount of the ROU Asset on the basis of the
remaining ROU Asset (i.e., 2,500 square meters corresponding to 50% of the original ROU Asset).
Consequently, Lessee reduces the carrying amount of the ROU Asset by Rs. 91,987.50 and the carrying
amount of the lease liability by Rs. 1,05,273. Lessee recognises the difference between the decrease in the
lease liability and the decrease in the ROU Asset (Rs. 1,05,273 – Rs. 91,987.50 = Rs. 13,285.50) as a gain
in profit or loss at the effective date of the modification (at the beginning of Year 6).
Lessee recognises the difference between the remaining lease liability of Rs. 1,05,273 and the modified
lease liability of Rs. 1,29,900 (which equals Rs. 24,627) as an adjustment to the ROU Asset reflecting the
change in the consideration paid for the lease and the revised discount rate.
Working Note:
Calculation of Initial value of ROU asset and lease liability:
Year Lease Present value Present value of lease
Payment(A) factor @ 6% (B) payments (A x B = C)
1 50,000 0.943 47,150
2 50,000 0.890 44,500
3 50,000 0.840 42,000
4 50,000 0.792 39,600
5 50,000 0.747 37,350
6 50,000 0.705 35,250
7 50,000 0.665 33,250
8 50,000 0.627 31,350
9 50,000 0.592 29,600
10 50,000 0.558 27,900
3,67,950
QUESTION 162:
([Link].305 - Question Bank)
Lessee enters into a 10-year lease for 2,000 square metres of office space. The annual lease payments are
Rs1,00,000 payable at the end of each year. The interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily
determined. Lessee’s incremental borrowing rate at the commencement date is 6% p.a.
At the beginning of Year 6, Lessee and Lessor agree to amend the original lease to:
(a) Include an additional 1,500 square metres of space in the same building starting from the beginning of
Year 6 and
(b) Reduce the lease term from 10 years to eight years. The annual fixed payment for the 3,500 square metres
is Rs1,50,000 payable at the end of each year (from Year 6 to Year 8). Lessee’s incremental borrowing rate
at the beginning of Year 6 is 7% p.a.
The consideration for the increase in scope of 1,500 square metres of space is not commensurate with the
stand-alone price for that increase adjusted to reflect the circumstances of the contract. Consequently, Lessee
does not account for the increase in scope that adds the right to use an additional 1,500 square metres of
space as a separate lease.
How should the said modification be accounted for?
SOLUTION:
The pre-modification ROU Asset and the pre-modification lease liability in relation to the lease are as
follows:
The modified liability equals Rs3,93,600, of which (a) Rs1,31,200 relates to the increase of Rs50,000 in the
annual lease payments from Year 6 to Year 8 and (refer note 1) (b) Rs2,62,400 relates to the remaining
three annual lease payments of Rs1,00,000 from Year 6 to Year 8 with reduction of lease term (Refer Note
3)
At the effective date of the modification (at the beginning of Year 6), the pre-modification lease liability is
Rs. 4,21,090. The remaining lease liability for the original 2,000 square metres of office space is Rs.
2,67,300 (i.e., present value of three annual lease payments of Rs. 1,00,000, discounted at the original
discount rate of 6% p.a.) (refer note 2).
Consequently, Lessee reduces the carrying amount of the ROU Asset by Rs. 1,47,180 (Rs. 3,67,950 – Rs.
2,20,770), and the carrying amount of the lease liability by Rs. 1,53,790 (Rs. 4,21,090 – Rs. 2,67,300).
Lessee recognises the difference between the decrease in the lease liability and the decrease in the ROU
Asset (Rs. 1,53,790 – Rs. 1,47,180 = Rs. 6,610) as a gain in profit or loss at the effective date of the
modification (at the beginning of Year 6).
Lease Liability Dr. 1,53,790
To ROU Asset 1,47,180
To Gain 6,610
At the effective date of the modification (at the beginning of Year 6), Lessee recognises the effect of the
remeasurement of the remaining lease liability reflecting the revised discount rate of 7% p.a., which is
Rs4,900 (Rs2,67,300 – Rs2,62,400*), as an adjustment to the ROU Asset.
*(Refer note 3)
Lease Liability Dr. 4,900
To ROU Asset 4,900
The modified ROU Asset and the modified lease liability in relation to the modified lease are as follows:
Lease liability ROU Asset
Year Opening Interes Lease Closing Opening Depreciati Closing
balance t payment balance balance on charge balance
expens
e @ 7%
6 3,93,600 27,552 (1,50,000) 2,71,152 3,47,100 (1,15,700) 2,31,400
**
7 2,71,152 18,981 (1,50,000) 1,40,133 2,31,400 (1,15,700) 1,15,700
8 1,40,133 9,867* (1,50,000) - 1,15,700 (1,15,700) -
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of lease liability on increased consideration:
Year Lease Payments Present value @7% Present value of
(A) (B) lease payments (A x
B = C)
1 50,000 0.935 46,750
2 50,000 0.873 43,650
3 50,000 0.816 40,800
Modified lease liability 1,31,200
2. Calculation of remaining lease liability for the original contract of 2000 square meters at
Original discount rate:
Year Lease Payments (A) Present value factor @ Present value of lease
6% (B) payments (A x B = C)
1 1,00,000 0.943 94,300
2 1,00,000 0.890 89,000
3 1,00,000 0.840 84,000
Remaining lease liability 2,67,300
3. Calculation of remaining lease liability for the original contract of 2000 square meters at
revised discount rate:
Year Lease Payments (A) Present value factor Present value of lease
@ 7%(B) payments (A x B = C)
1 1,00,000 0.935 93,500
2 1,00,000 0.873 87,300
3 1,00,000 0.816 81,600
Remaining lease liability 2,62,400
5. Calculation of opening balance of Modified ROU Asset at the beginning of 6th year:
The remaining ROU Asset for the original 2,000 square metres of office 2,20,770
space after decrease in term
Less: Adjustment for increase in interest rate from 6% to 7% (4,870)
Add: Adjustment for increase in leased space 1,31,200
3,47,100
QUESTION 163:
([Link].401 - Question Bank)
A Lessor enters into a 10-year lease of equipment with Lessee. The equipment is not specialised in nature and
is expected to have alternative use to Lessor at the end of the 10-year lease term. Under the lease:
❖ Lessor receives annual lease payments of Rs15,000, payable at the end of the year
❖ Lessor expects the residual value of the equipment to be Rs50,000 at the end of the 10-year lease term
❖ Lessee provides a residual value guarantee that protects Lessor from the first Rs30,000 of loss for a sale
at a price below the estimated residual value at the end of the lease term (i.e., Rs50,000)
❖ The equipment has an estimated remaining economic life of 15 years, a carrying amount of Rs1,00,000
and a fair value of Rs1,11,000
❖ The lease does not transfer ownership of the underlying asset to Lessee at the end of the lease term or
contain an option to purchase the underlying asset
❖ The interest rate implicit in the lease is 10.078%.
How should the Lessor account for the same in its books of accounts?
SOLUTION:
Lessor shall classify the lease as a FINANCE LEASE because the sum of the present value of lease
payments amounts to substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset.
At lease commencement, Lessor accounts for the finance lease, as follows:
Net investment in the lease
Rs 1,11,000(a)
Cost of goods sold
Rs 92,340(b)
Revenue
Rs 1,03,340(c)
Property held for lease
Rs 1,00,000(d)
To record the net investment in the finance lease and derecognise the underlying asset.
(a) The net investment in the lease consists of:
(1) The present value of 10 annual payments of Rs15,000 plus the guaranteed residual value of
Rs30,000, both discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease, which equals Rs1,03,340 (i.e.,
the lease payment) (Refer note 1) AND
(2) The present value of unguaranteed residual asset of Rs20,000, which equals Rs7,660 (Refer note
2).Note that the net investment in the lease is subject to the same considerations as other assets
in classification as current or non-current assets in a classified balance sheet.
(b) Cost of goods sold is the carrying amount of the equipment of Rs1,00,000 (less) the present value of
the unguaranteed residual asset of Rs7,660.
(c) Revenue equals the lease receivable.
(d) The carrying amount of the underlying asset.
At lease commencement, Lessor recognises selling profit of Rs11,000 which is calculated as = lease
payment of Rs1,03,340 – [carrying amount of the asset (Rs1,00,000) – net of any unguaranteed
residual asset (Rs7,660) i.e. which equals Rs92,340]
Cash
Rs 15,000(e)
Net investment in the lease
Rs 3,813(f)
Interest income
Rs 11,187(g)
The following table summarises the interest income from this lease and the related amortisation of the
net investment over the lease term:
Year Annual Rental Annual Interest Net investment at the end
Payment Income(h) of the year
Initial net - - 1,11,000
investment
1 15,000 11,187 1,07,187
2 15,000 10,802 1,02,989
3 15,000 10,379 98,368
4 15,000 9,914 93,282
5 15,000 9,401 87,683
6 15,000 8,837 81,520
7 15,000 8,216 74,736
8 15,000 7,532 67,268
9 15,000 6,779 59,047
10 15,000 5,953
50,000(i)
(h) Interest income equals 10.078% of the net investment in the lease at the beginning of each year. For
e.g., Year 1 annual interest income is calculated as Rs1,11,000 (initial net investment) x 10.078%.
(i) The estimated residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease term.
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of net investment in lease:
Year Lease Payment Present value factor @ Present value of lease
(A) 10.078% (B) payments (A x B = C)
1 15,000 0.908 13,620
2 15,000 0.825 12,375
3 15,000 0.750 11,250
4 15,000 0.681 10,215
5 15,000 0.619 9,285
6 15,000 0.562 8,430
7 15,000 0.511 7,665
8 15,000 0.464 6,960
9 15,000 0.421 6,315
10 15,000 0.383 5,745
10 30,000 0.383 11,480*
1,03,340
* Figure has been rounded off for equalization of journal entry.
How should the said transaction be accounted by the Seller-lessee and the Buyer-lessor?
SOLUTION:
Considering facts of the case, Seller-lessee and buyer-lessor account for the transaction as a sale and
leaseback.
Firstly, since the consideration for the sale of the building is not at fair value, Seller-lessee and Buyer -
lessor make adjustments to measure the sale proceeds at fair value. Thus, the amount of the excess sale
price of Rs3,00,000 (as calculated below) is recognised as additional financing provided by Buyer-lessor to
Seller-lessee.
Sale Price: 30,00,000
Less: Fair Value (at the date of sale): (27,00,000)
Additional financing provided by Buyer-lessor to Seller-lessee 3,00,000
Next step would be to calculate the present value of the annual payments which amounts to Rs14,94,000
(calculated considering 20 payments of Rs2,00,000 each, discounted at 12% p.a.) of which Rs3,00,000
relates to the additional financing (as calculated above) and balance Rs11,94,000 relates to the lease —
corresponding to 20 annual payments of Rs40,164 and Rs1,59,836, respectively (refer calculations below).
Seller-Lessee:
At the commencement date, Seller-lessee measures the ROU asset arising from the leaseback of the
building at the proportion of the previous carrying amount of the building that relates to the right-of-use
retained by Seller-lessee, calculated as follows:
Seller-lessee recognises only the amount of the gain that relates to the rights transferred to Buyer-lessor,
calculated as follows:
Fair Value (at the date of sale) (A) 27,00,000
Carrying Amount (B) 15,00,000
Discounted lease payments for the 20-year ROU asset (C) 11,94,000
Gain on sale of building (D) = (A -B) 12,00,000
Relating to the right to use the building retained by Seller-lessee(E) = [(D / A) 5,30,667
x C]
Relating to the rights transferred to Buyer-lessor (D -E) 6,69,333
After the commencement date, Buyer-lessor accounts for the lease by treating Rs1,59,840 of the annual
payments of Rs2,00,000 as lease payments. The remaining Rs40,160 of annual payments received from
Seller-lessee are accounted for as:
(a) payments received to settle the financial asset of Rs3,00,000 AND
(b) Interest revenue.
TOPIC - 31
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
QUESTION 165: (SIMILAR TO RTP Nov’20, MTP Nov’23)
([Link].05 – Question Bank )
Deepak started a new company Softbharti Pvt. Ltd. with Iktara Ltd. wherein investment of 55% is done by
Iktara Ltd. and rest by Deepak. Voting powers are to be given as per the proportionate share of capital
contribution. The new company formed was the subsidiary of Iktara Ltd. with two directors, and Deepak
eventually becomes one of the directors of company. A consultant was hired and he charged Rs. 30,000 for
the incorporation of company and to do other necessary statuary registrations. Rs. 30,000 is to be charged as
an expense in the books after incorporation of company. The company, Softbharti Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated
on 1st April 20X1.
The financials of Iktara Ltd. are prepared as per Ind AS.
An accountant who was hired at the time of company’s incorporation, has prepared the draft financials of
Softbharti Pvt. Ltd. for the year ending 31st March, 20X2 as follows:
Balance Sheet
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
(1) Shareholders’ Funds
(a) Share Capital 1,00,000
(b) Reserves & Surplus 2,27,500
(2) Non-Current Liabilities
(a) Long Term Provisions 25,000
(b) Deferred tax liabilities 6,000
(3) Current Liabilities
(a) Trade Payables 11,000
(b) Other Current Liabilities 45,000
(c) Short Term Provisions 1,06,500
TOTAL 5,21,000
ASSETS
(1) Non-Current Assets
(a) Property, plant and equipment (net) 1,00,000
(b) Long-term Loans and Advances 40,000
(c) Other Non-Current Assets 50,000
(2) Current Assets
(a) Current Investment 30,000
SOLUTION
If Ind AS is applicable to any company, then Ind AS shall automatically be made applicable to all the
subsidiaries, holding companies, associated companies, and joint ventures of that company, irrespective
of individual qualification of set of standards on such companies.
In the given case it has been mentioned that the financials of Iktara Ltd. are prepared as per Ind AS.
Accordingly, the results of its subsidiary Softbharti Pvt. Ltd. should also have been prepared as per Ind
AS. However, the financials of Softbharti Pvt. Ltd. have been presented as per accounting standards (AS).
Hence, it is necessary to revise the financial statements of Softbharti Pvt. Ltd. as per Ind AS after the
incorporation of necessary adjustments mentioned in the question. The revised financial statements of
Softbharti Pvt. Ltd. as per Ind AS and Division II to Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013 are as follows:
STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS
for the year ended 31st March, 20X2
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
Revenue from operations 10,00,000
Other Income (1,00,000 + 20,000) (refer note -1) 1,20,000
Total Revenue 11,20,000
Expenses:
Purchase of stock in trade 5,00,000
(Increase) / Decrease in stock in trade (50,000)
BALANCE SHEET
as at 31st March, 20X2
Particulars Rs.
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 1,00,000
Financial assets
Other financial assets (Long-term loans and advances) 40,000
Other non-current assets (capital advances) (refer note-2) 50,000
Current assets
Inventories 80,000
Financial assets
Investments (30,000 + 20,000) (refer note -1) 50,000
Trade receivables 55,000
Cash and cash equivalents/Bank 1,15,000
Other financial assets (Interest receivable from trade receivables) 51,000
TOTAL ASSETS 5,41,000
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Equity share capital 1,00,000
Other equity 2,45,200
Non-current liabilities
Provision (25,000 – 1,000) 24,000
Deferred tax liabilities (4800 + 300) 5,100
Current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables 11,000
Other financial liabilities (Refer note 5) 15,000
Other current liabilities (Govt. statuary dues) (Refer note 3) 15,000
Current tax liabilities 1,25,700
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 5,41,000
B) OTHER EQUITY
Reserves & Surplus
Retained Earnings Rs.
As at 31st March, 20X1-
Profit for the year 2,44,500
Other comprehensive income for the year 700
Total comprehensive income for the year 2,45,200
Less: Dividend on equity shares (refer note – 4) -
As at 31st March, 20X2 2,45,200
Rs.
Balance of other current liabilities as per financial statements 45,000
Less: Dividend declared for FY 20X1 – 20X2 (Note – 4) (15,000)
Reclassification of government statuary dues payable to ‘other current liabilities’ (15,000)
Closing balance 15,000
Working Note:
Calculation of deferred tax on temporary differences as per Ind AS 12 for financial year 20X1 – 20X2
Item Carrying Tax Base Difference DTA / DTL
amount Rs. (Rs.) Rs. @ 30% Rs.
Property, Plant and Equipment 1,00,000 80,000 20,000 6,000-DTL
Pre-incorporation expenses Nil 24,000 24,000 7,200-DTA
Current Investment 50,000 30,000 20,000 6,000-DTL
Net DTL 4,800-DTL
Additional Information:
1. On 1st April 20X1, 8% convertible loan with a nominal value of ₹ 64,00,000 was issued by the entity. It is
redeemable on 31st March 20X5 also at par. Alternatively, it may be converted into equity shares on the
basis of 100 new shares for each ₹ 200 worth of loan.
An equivalent loan without the conversion option would have carried interest at 10%. Interest of ₹ 5,12,000
has already been paid and included as a finance cost.
Present Value (PV) rates are as follows:
2. After the reporting period, the board of directors have recommended dividend of ₹ 50,000 for the year
ending 31st March, 20X1. However, the same has not been yet accounted by the company in its financials.
6. Current Investments consist of securities held for trading which are carried at fair value through profit &
loss. Investments were purchased on 1st January,20X2 at ₹ 55,000 and accordingly are shown at cost as
at 31st March 20X2. The fair value of said investments as on 31st March 20X2 is ₹ 60,000.
7. Trade payables and Trade receivables are due within 12 months.
8. There has been no changes in equity share capital during the year.
9. Entity has the intention to set off a deferred tax asset against a deferred tax liability as they relate to
income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the entity has a legally enforceable right to set off
taxes.
10. Other Equity consists retained earnings only. The opening balance of retained earnings was ₹ 21,25,975
as at 1st April 20X1.
11. No dividend has been actually paid by company during the year.
12. Assume that the deferred tax impact, if any on account of above adjustments is correctly calculated in
financials.
Being Finance & Accounts manager, you are required to identify the errors and misstatements if any in the
balance sheet of Master Creator Private Limited and prepare corrected balance sheet with details on the face
of the balance sheet i.e. no need to prepare notes to accounts, after considering the additional information.
Provide necessary explanations/workings for the treated items, wherever necessary.
Solution
Balance Sheet of Master Creator Private Limited as at 31st March, 20X2
Current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables 13 6,69,180
Other financial liabilities 14 1,19,299
Other current liabilities (TDS payable) 15 81,265
Current tax liabilities 9,30,820
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 1,24,50,850
B. Other Equity
Item Retained Equity component of Total (₹)
Earnings (₹) Compound Financial
Instrument (₹)
As at 31st March, 20X1 21,25,975 - 21,25,975
Total comprehensive income for the year (25,00,150 + 2,93,671 - 2,93,671
5,000 - 85,504- 21,25,975)
Issue of compound financial instrument during the year - 4,24,960 4,24,960
As at 31st March, 20X2 24,19,646 4,24,960 28,44,606
Prepaid expenses does not result into receipt of any cash or financial asset. However, it results into future
goods or services. Hence, it is not a financial asset.
9. As per Ind AS 10, 'Events after the Reporting Period', If dividends are declared after the reporting period
but before the financial statements are approved for issue, the dividends are not recognized as a liability
at the end of the reporting period because no obligation exists at that time. Such dividends are disclosed
in the notes in accordance with Ind AS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements.
10. 'Other Equity' cannot be shown under 'Non-current liabilities'. Accordingly, it is reclassified under
'Equity'.
11. There are both 'equity' and 'debt' features in the instrument. An obligation to pay cash i.e. interest at
8% per annum and a redemption amount will be treated as 'financial liability' while option to convert
the loan into equity shares is the equity element in the instrument. Therefore, convertible loan is a
compound financial instrument.
Calculation of debt and equity component and amount to be recognised in the books:
S. No Year Interest Discounting Amount
amount @ 8% factor @ 10%
Year 1 20X2 5,12,000 0.91 4,65,920
Year 2 20X3 5,12,000 0.83 4,24,960
Year 3 20X4 5,12,000 0.75 3,84,000
Year 4 20X5 69,12,000 0.68 47,00,160
Amount to be recognised as a liability 59,75,040
Initial proceeds (64,00,000)
Amount to be recognised as equ 4,24,960
* In year 4, the loan note will be redeemed; therefore, the cash outflow would be ₹ 69,12,000 (₹ 64,00,000 +
₹ 5,12,000).
Presentation in the Financial Statements:
In Statement of Profit and Loss for the year ended on 31 March 20X2
Finance cost to be recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss (59,75,040 x 10%) ₹ 5,97,504
Less: Already charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss (₹ 5,12,000)
Additional finance charge required to be recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss ₹ 85,504
12. Since entity has the intention to set off deferred tax asset against deferred tax liability and the entity
has a legally enforceable right to set off taxes, hence their balance on net basis should be shown as:
Particulars Amount (₹)
Deferred tax liability 4,74,850
Deferred tax asset (2,54,150)
Deferred tax liability (net) 2,20,700
13. A liability that is a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity is
a financial liability. Trade payables is a financial liability in this case.
14. 'Other current financial liabilities':
Particulars Amount (₹)
Wages payable 21,890
Salary payable 61,845
15. Liabilities for which there is no contractual obligation to deliver cash or other financial asset to another
entity, are not financial liabilities. Hence, TDS payable should be reclassified from 'Other current
financial liabilities' to 'Other current liabilities' since it is not a contractual obligation.
Notes to Accounts:
Note 1: Reserves and surplus (Rs in lakh)
Capital reserve 500
Surplus from P & L
Additional information:
(i) Share capital comprises of 100 lakh shares of Rs 10each.
(ii) Term Loan from bank for Rs 5,700 lakh also includes interest accrued and due of Rs 700 lakh as on the
reporting date.
(iii) Reserve for foreseeable loss is created against a service contract due within 6months.
(iv) Inventory should be valued at cost Rs 1,500 lakh, NRV as on date is Rs1,200 lakh.
(v) Adividendof10%wasdeclaredbytheBoardofdirectorsofthecompany.
(vi) Accrued Interest income of Rs 300 lakh is not booked in the books of the company.
(vii) Deferred taxes related to taxes on income are levied by the same governing tax laws.
Identify and report the errors and misstatements in the above extracts and prepare corrected Balance Sheet
and Statement of Profit & Loss and where required the relevant notes to the accounts with explanations thereof.
SOLUTION
Following adjustments / rectifications are required to be done
1. Reserve for foreseeable loss for Rs 400 lakh, due within 6 months, should be a part of provisions. Hence
it needs to be regrouped. If it was also part of previous year’s comparatives, a note should be added in
the notes to account on the regrouping done this year.
2. Interest accrued and due of Rs 700 lakh on term loan will be a part of current liabilities.
Thus, it should be shown under the heading “Other Current Liabilities”.
3. As per Ind AS 2, inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net real is able value. The amount
of any write down of inventories to net realisable value is recognised as an expense in the period the
write-down occurs. Hence, the inventories should be valued at Rs 1,200 lakh and write down of Rs 300
lakh (Rs 1,500 lakh – Rs 1,200 lakh) will be added to the operating cost of the entity.
4. In the absence of the declaration date of dividend in the question, it is presumed that the dividend is
declared after the reporting date. Hence, no adjustment for the same is made in the financial year 2018-
2019. However, a note will be given separately in this regard (not forming part of item of financial
statements).
5. Accrued income will be shown in the Statement of Profit and Loss as ‘Other Income’ and as ‘Other
Current Asset’ in the Balance Sheet.
6. Since the deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets relate to taxes on income levied by the same
governing taxation laws, these shall be set off, in accordance with IndAS12. The net DTA of Rs 300 lakh
will be shown in the balance sheet.
7. As per Division II of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013, the Statement of Profit and Loss should
present the Earnings per Equity Share.
V'Smart Academy Page | 251
Must Do Questions by Jai Chawla Sir CA Final FR
8. In Ind AS, Assets are not presented in the Balance sheet as ‘Fixed Asset’; rather they are classified
under various categories of Non-current assets. Here, it is assumed as ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’.
9. The presentation of the notes to ‘Trade Receivables’ will be modified as per the requirements of Division
II of Schedule III.
Balance Sheet of Abraham Ltd. For the year ended 31stMarch, 2019
Note No. (Rs in lakh)
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 5,000
Deferred tax assets 1 300
Current assets
Inventories 1,200
Financial assets
Trade receivables 2 1,100
Cash and cash equivalents 2,000
Others financial asset (accrued interest) 300
TOTAL 9,900
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Equity share capital 3 1,000
Other equity 4 2,000
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Long-term borrowings 5 5,000
Current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables 300
Others 6 710
Short-term provisions (300 + 400) 7 700
Other current liabilities 8 190
TOTAL 9,900
1,000 0 1,000
4. Other Equity (Rs in lakh)
Particulars Reserves & Surplus Total
Capital Retained
reserve Earnings
Balance at the beginning of the year 500* 550 1,050
Total comprehensive income for the year 950 950
Balance at the end of the year 500 1,500 2,000
*Note: Capital reserve given in the Note 1 of the question is assumed to be brought forward from the previous
year. However, alternatively, if it may be assumed as created during the year.