the draft RFP for application for automation of
ion Meetinf in the Tarini
Conference Hall of 2nd floor, Star
Following members attended the meeting:
joined through WEB
Convenor of the committee welcomed the members of the Committee and
The draft RFP was deliberated in detail and committee suggested their
Recommender for Deviation/ Exception is mentioned as CGM ofConcerneiT
Item 14 of Para 3. 4.1 Vertical. But it may be noted that all departments are not headed by GMs.
Hence CGM to be replaced with CGM/ GM (GM in case where department in
_are not assigned;
3. 4. 3.6 In Enforcement Module Root-Cause Analysis and Validation by Complianc''e'
and IS A are to be included as an additional actionable.
cover page
Point No 12 of RFP -: Pre-bid meeting may be s
oflTi To be re-drafted in line with Point No 2 of RFP cover page.
also include gulatory compliances of other department (like
regulatory ai System should
with option
RFP should contain table ch should ask the dder for the list of services
Additional Para
Sank of India ing the concentr
(ration risk).
•••!:f, 'S:
yv f. r-
~[ ^r H
j^iSi^^Eion:ints
RFP should cisntair 1 that proposed system slhoiild have ca[lability to integrate
Additional Para with existing s•ysten n (likei AD server, IDAM ii~ite\ gration, DM S etc. ) No extra
charges shoy IId be paid!for this integration.
From scope it seen1S theit it is addressing onily<Jomestic re gulatory
Additional Para compliances. Scopie sho uld also cover the liitei'national co mpliances. Centre
wise.
SAST/DAST £ >houl( 1 be c:onducted by vendo r b<sfore the apiplication live.
Additional Para Further SAST /DAS T she>uld be conducted o n q uarterly bas is from CERT-IN
,
auditors.
Additional Para VAPT complic shou ild be responsibility oft he vendor.
after the members made the requested changes. Wit!
above, the gathering came to an end with vote of thanks.
Asst. General Manager
Ciasslfication; ^nterm