CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
Session : July 2021
Lecture-6
Design of Slab Bridge
Ishfaq Aziz
Assistant Professor
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (BUET)
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
2
Lecture Outline
Design of a SLAB BRIDGE
• We will design superstructure:
➢ Deck Slab and
➢ Curb (Edge Beam)
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
3
Slab Bridge
Bituminous
wearing
course
Slab Bridge:
• Small Span
• No navigation (ships/boats)
• Only water flows
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
4
Design of Deck Slab
Deck DECK SLAB ts
Slab
Abutment
Clear Span
Figure: Longitudinal Section
18” 18”
Design of Curb
CL
DECK SLAB
CURB CURB
Figure: Transverse section of the bridge
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
5
Loading for slab design
Two directions of traffic are
a) Dead Load Longitudinal section
• From self weight of Slab Traffic Parallel to the span
• From wearing course
b) Live load
From vehicular loading-HL93
a) Truck Load
Transverse section
b) Tandem Load
Traffic Perpendicular to the span
c) Lane Load (similar to the one in cantilever bridge)
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
6
Vehicular Loading (HL-93)
Both Truck and Tandem loads are subjected to dynamic allowance (impact)
Lane load is not subjected
to dynamic allowance
(impact) Design Lane
Load
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
7
Load Combination→ Strength-I: 1.25DC+1.5DW+1.75LL
Considering impact allowance:
1.25(DC) + 1.5(DW) + 1.75(LL)(1+IM/100)Truck/Tandem + 1.75(LL)Lane
Design of Deck Slab
Steps of Design of the Deck slab by USD method:
1. Determine ‘Effective Span’ and ‘Thickness’ of the slab
2. Determine loads on the bridge and calculate moments
3. Design the reinforcement
a. Main reinforcement
b. Distribution reinforcement
c. Temperature and shrinkage reinforcement
4. Detailing
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
8
Determine ‘Effective Span’ and ‘Thickness’ of the slab
a. Effective Span, L = S =smaller of (c/c distance between supports) and (clear span + slab thickness)
Find by b. Determine minimum thickness of the slab.
trials 𝑆 + 10
𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 1.2 × deflection control criteria ; 𝑆 in feet
between 30
these two
Deck DECK SLAB ts
Slab
Abutment
Clear Span
Figure: Longitudinal Section
18” 18”
Loads
a) Dead load b) Live load
wsw = UDL due to slab self-weight From Influence Line Analysis
wwc = UDL due to wearing course=30 psf
wsw×𝑆2 wwc×𝑆2
MDC= ; MDW=
8 8
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
9
b) Live load
From vehicular loading
• Wheel load distribution width,
𝐸 = (4 + 0.06𝑆) ft ≤ 7 𝑓𝑡
Figure: Longitudinal Section
Deck ts
Slab
Abutment
• Actual Load = Axle Load/2E Clear Span
18” 18”
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
10
Figure: Longitudinal Section
Calculate Live load moment: Deck
Slab
ts
1. Draw Influence Line for Moment at Mid-Span
Abutment
Clear Span
2. Calculate Truck Load Moment
3. Calculate Tandem Load Moment 18” 18”
4. Calculate Lane Load Moment ILM(midspan)
S
• Calculate Impact Factor.
Truck Load
𝐼𝑀
𝐼𝐹 = 1+ = 1.33
100
Tandem Load
Lane Load
Design Moment,
𝑴𝒖 = 1.25𝑀𝐷𝐶 + 1.5𝑀𝐷𝑊 + 1.75[1.33𝑀𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑘/𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚 +𝑀𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒 ]
𝑀𝑢 𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦
𝐴𝑠 = 𝑎 ; 𝑎 = 0.85𝑓 ′ 𝑏 → 𝑨𝒔(𝒎𝒂𝒊𝒏) ; b=12” for slab
∅𝑓𝑦 (𝑑 − ) 𝑐
2
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
11
Calculate and design Reinforcement b)Distribution reinforcement
a. Main reinforcement
• For main reinforcement parallel to traffic:
• Along the span (parallel to traffic direction here)
• Comes from flexural requirement (100/ 𝑠 ≤ 50) % of 𝐴𝑠(𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛)
• For main reinforcement perpendicular to traffic:
b. Distribution reinforcement (220/ 𝑠 ≤ 67 ) % of 𝐴𝑠(𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛)
• Perpendicular to traffic direction here
c. Temperature and shrinkage reinforcement 𝑨𝒔(𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏) →#?? @??” c/c
• Along both direction
c)Temperature and shrinkage reinforcement
• Provide Temperature reinforcement.
According to AASHTO 8.20.1, As(temp. & shrnkg)= 1/8 in2 /ft
need to be provided under all exposed surfaces.
𝑨𝒔(𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒑.& 𝒔𝒉𝒓𝒏𝒌𝒈.) →#?? @??” c/c
k DECK SLAB ts • Check for shear and bond. Not necessary for slabs
b
designed for bending in this method.
tment
Clear Span
Figure: Longitudinal Section
18” 18”
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
12
Detailing of the Deck slab:
Temp. and Shrinkage reinforcement Wearing course
Deck d ts
Slab
1.5”
Main rebar Distribution Reinforcement
Abutment
Abutment
Clear Span
18” 18”
Figure: Longitudinal Section
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
13
Design of Curb/Edge Beam
**Similar to Beam**
Analysis and Design:
• Assume width of the beam, b .
• Provide a curb 10” high.
• Calculate wDc for self weight & railing.
Self weight includes slab and curb weight.
Weight of railing is assumed to be 15 lb/ft.
• Compute DL & LL Moments.
MDC = wDCL2/8 lb-ft= wDCS2/8
CL
MLL = 0.10 P×S
Deck slab
P is wheel load of HS 20 truck = 16 kip Curb Curb
Figure: Transverse section of the bridge
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
14
Curb Design
CL
Analysis and Design:
10" + 𝑡𝑠" 24"
Self weight = × × 150 = ? ? lb/ft Deck slab
12 12
Curb Curb
Railing weight = 15 lb/ft (assumed) Figure: Transverse section of the bridge
wDL = ??
MDC= wDL×S2/8
MLL=0.1×P×S [P= 16k for HS 20]
Design Moment, 𝑴𝒖 = 1.25𝑀𝐷𝐶 + 1.75𝑀𝐿𝐿 #?? Stirrup @ ??” c/c
CL
Design Shear, 𝑽𝒖 = 1.25𝑉𝐷𝐶 + 1.75𝑉𝐿𝐿 ≥ 10"
Deck slab 𝑡𝑠
Rest of the design is the same as a beam design for
shear and flexure
24"
??#??
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
15
Design Data
• Clear Span= 20+n/2 (n=1,2,3,.......34) Wearing surface loading = 30 psf
• Abutment width = 1.5 ft Vehicular Live Load→HL-93
• Clear Width = 24 ft (Odd roll nos.)
30 ft (Even roll nos.)
CL
• Tensile strength of steel, Deck slab
• fy = 40 ksi (Odd roll nos.) Clear Width
Curb
60 ksi (Even roll nos.) Figure: Transverse section of the bridge
• Concrete Compressive Strength
fc'= 4000 psi (Odd roll nos.)
3500 psi (Even roll nos.)
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
16
Report-6: Design of Slab Bridge
e . and Shrin age reinforce ent earing course
• Design of Deck Slab Deck
s
Slab
• Design of Curb/Edge Beam 1.5
ain rebar i trib tion einforce ent
Detailing
butment
• butment
lear Span
Design Drawings: 18 18
i re on it dinal Section
• One longitudinal section showing deck slab
?? Stirrup @ ?? c/c
reinforcement
• One transverse section showing both slab 10"
and edge beam reinforcement
c s
24"
?? ??
Reference: Figure: Transverse section of the bridge
• AASHTO code
• Design of Modern Highway Bridges
→ Example 6.1 by WSD method
-Narendra Tally
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET
CE 316: Bridge Design Sessional
17
End of Lecture 6
End of Mid-Term Syllabus!
THANK YOU!
Any Question?
IA Dept. of Civil Engg. BUET