Why the future does not need us
In 2000, Bill Joy, the chief scientist of Sun Microsystems, wrote a controversial
essay that warned about the potential threat that the advances in
nanotechnology, genetic engineering, and robotics could pose to humans. He
stated that these technologies could make them extinct.
The main argument of Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us is that we
have been living on top of a finite resource for thousands of years.
Earth’s natural resources like oil, metals and minerals. These
resources will eventually run out, so when they do, we will no longer
be able to survive without technological advances. However, the
experiences of atomic scientists have shown that we need to take responsibility
for our actions and learn from the mistakes that we make. They also warned
that we can create problems that are impossible to solve in a short time. We
must do more to anticipate the consequences of our inventions. It allows them
to share their personal interests and support the growth of their environment. I
want to say that the future is not like a wave of water, but it's more
like a wave of sand. We can build on top of that wave, and we will be
able to make our own future. But if we just let the wave wash over us,
then we're going to lose everything. That's why I think it's important
for people to do their best in school and work hard, so they can have
jobs when they grow up because there are going to be all these waves
coming at you from different directions, and you need something
solid underneath your feet, so you don't get washed.
The powers of our intellect, our rationality, and our technology are capable of
corrupting human nature if they are not reined in. If we are not able to rein in
these forces, then we will destroy the world.