0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 41 views 9 pages Communicative Approach
Chapter 6 discusses the Communicative Approach to Language Teaching, emphasizing the importance of communicative competence, which includes grammatical, discourse, strategic, and sociolinguistic knowledge. The approach prioritizes interaction and real-life communication over mere grammatical accuracy, aiming to develop learners' ability to use language functionally in various contexts. While it offers advantages such as increased language practice and fluency, it also faces challenges like teacher competence and neglect of reading skills.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save communicative approach For Later
CHAPTER 6
Communicative Approach to
Language Teaching.
Language, as we know, is a means of communication. When we
use language for communication, we must have a knowledge of
the linguistic forms of the language. The user of a language, to
make communication effective, requires a knowledge of the
social meaning of the linguistic forms and their functions. If the
user of a language has only the knowledge of language rules
and forms, then he is said to have ‘linguistic competence’, and
if he also has the knowledge that enables him to communicate
functionally and interactively then he is said to have
‘communicate competence’. The term ‘communicative
competence’ has now become a household word in second
language teaching.
What is Communicative Competence?
It is that aspect of our competence that enables us to convey
and interpret messages and to negotiate meaning interpersonally
within specific contexts, ‘communicate competence is relative,
not absolute, and depends on the cooperation of all the participants
involved’ (Savignon 1983). It is an interpersonal construct that
can only be examined by means of the overt performance of
two or more individuals in the process of negotiating meaning.
It is an ability not only to apply the grammatical rules of a
language in order to form grammatically correct sentences but
also know when and where to use these sentences and to whom.
Communicative competence includes:
(a) knowledge of the grammar and vocabulary of the
language158. Teaching of English
0) Knowledge of ‘rules of speaking”
{knowing how to use and respond to different types of
pooch sets such ne requests apologies, thanks ete. and
(2) moving how to use the language appropriately
owe canconcladeand s3ythatcommunicative competence
includes (a) grammatical competence () discourse competence
@) strategic competence and (€) sociolinguistic competence,
‘Grammatical or Kingustie competence isthe communicative
nowledge of grammar and vocabulary. Discourse competence
fers to the interpretation of individual message elements in
terms of (a) the content, (b) elation in which the discourse takes
place and (c) the interconnectedness employed to initiate,
terminate, maintain, repair and redirect communication. Socio-
linguistic competence refers to an undestanding of the social
context in which communication takes place and of the role
lationship of the participants
‘Communicative Approach to language teaching alms at
developing the communicative competence of the learners which
‘would include the learners acquiring the knowledge.
The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching
The basic idea that communicative ability is the goal of
foreign language leaming is not a new one. The structural
approach and the audio-lingual method stressed communicative
ability. “If developments since the 1970s have special claim to
the label ‘communicative’, itis because the implications of
‘goal have been explored more thoroughly and expliitly than
before.”
‘The communicative approach to language teaching is based
‘on the belief that acquiring a language means to communicate
confidently and flueetly in the language.
Perspective on Language and Language Learning
1. Communicative approach opens up a wider perspective
(on language learning. In particular, it makes us move strongly
amare that itis not enough to teach learners how to manipulate
structures of the foreign language. They must also develop
Communicative Approach to Teaching English 159
strategies for relating these stuctutes to theie communicative
functions in real situations and geal time
ics of the communicative view of
2, The main character
language are:
(i) Language is a system of the expression of meaning.
(i). The primary function of language is for interaction and
communication.
(ii) The structure of language reflects its functional anc
Gv) The primary units of language ate not merely is
(9 ammatcl and stractural fenures, Bat etegore ot
Fintona and communicative meaning 3s examples
in discoure
Communicative Approach aims at developing
commansntive competence othe leamers which would ede
thelenmers asjuling the rowledge of communicative functors
tthe language and the linguistic means to perfor the diferest,
kinds of functions
Fanaions
‘ing language to ge Bins
2. The regulatory function sing language to conte be
Tange
The intramentlFancions
sing language to crea,
3. The interactional function
using language to express
4. The personal functions:
personal feelings and meanings,
5. The heuristic fonctions tusing language to Fearn and
discover.
6, The imaginative functions using language to create Weel
‘of the imagination
7. The representational functions : using language #9
‘Communicative Functions of Language
The term ‘Functions’ refers to ‘What the speaker uses
language for as opposed to how he does160 Tracking of English
‘The term function refers tothe purpose for which an ut
for unit of langage i= deed. In language teaching,
functions are often described as categories of behaviour such as
requests, apologies, complaints, suggestions, offers,
compliments and # function may be expressed using different
[grammatical forms
Give me that pen——(orden),
Pass the salt————{request).
Turn to the left and proceed —— instruction).
Try this cycle { suggestions)
Come home on Sunday ———( invitation).
(a) Be quiet — is in order.
() Have some coffee — is an offer
(©) Give ws this day our daly bread — is a plea.
‘Also a function like a greeting can be expressed using
various forms as given below:
Notional-Functional Syllabus
‘The earlier approaches to language teaching were grammar
based, but Wilkins in 1976 brought out a ‘Notional syllabus’. A
notional syllabus, is an arrangement of pieces of language
functions and notions and not forms.
‘That language syllabus, in which the language content is
arranged in terms of functions or specch acts-together with the
language items needed for them is called a functional syllabus.
‘what do the learners communicate through language?
Instead of asking how the speakers of the language express
themselves or when and where they use the language, we ask
‘what they communicate through language. We are then able to
lrganize language teaching in terms of content rather than the
form of the language.’ (Wilkins 1976).
What are Notions?
We know ‘functions’ are labels attached to sentences saying
what they do. In sentences, there may be other units of content,
Communicative Approach 19 Teaching Engh voy
called concepts. These concepts which also help ta conse
Sfeaning ofthe sentence and meaning ae called rotons ies,
re eategories of meaning such as time, durtion, at
Sha location. For example the preposition “ina rowea
Lused to express time and space sin the evening, In hey
‘A notional functional syllabus can then be described as a
syllabus that isbased on an analysis of what notions o
Particular learners need to express themselves in
Binguage and the language items
‘meaning,
‘A ntionlfntiona slabs is need based fakes ito
account the needs of the letnetss N asares ceeie
Stemuniction snke the grammer based yay cheeses
Gre mere knowledge ef srcure and les ene
functional slab nso focuses mare on wing eae
fara purpose. This Kind of yas best sual for epee
tourss lke English fr Doctors, Engh or Engineers Sapich
fer Englsh for Scents ct Aetna faker ayes
{io focus on giving minimus adequate renner.
wrmeanings
the target
required to express these
Difference between Communicative Approach and Structural
Approach
The following table will summarise the difference between
the two:
Toad Tngual method Cvaive Apres eh
Ty Focuses on tructare and) Meaning is paramount
form more than meaning.
2. Memorsing dialogues that No such demand on memorisstion
srebased on structures is of dialogues that centre around
encouraged and demanded functions.
3. Language tems are not con- Contextualistion isa base
texualised. premise,
4. Language lesming is viewed Language latring is wiewed as
as leaming, learn to communicate
5, Mastery of structures is __ Effective communication f=
sought stressed,162 Teaching of English
© Dring stahenas prime Daingay occur priphera
Deni ingmay our but pecpheray,
7 Natwesreoer ke pronun- Conprehensible pronunciation i
atom sought sour
& Grammatical explanations _Any device whch helpsthe learners
seo ised re
9. Meuse ofthe kamer'sative_Juiows us ofthe ive angus
language is forbidden. race 2
10. Reading and wong are Reading ad verng can sat ftom
set aside til speech is mastered, the begining
1, Linguistic competence isthe Communicative competence
goal the gol
_—S—$iese
Communicate Approach to Language Teaching
Communicative language teaching looks at language as a
system for the expression of meaning using functions sed vetione
The primary function of language is interaction ond
communication, the structure of a language is not merely ie
‘grammatical and structural features, ut categories of funtion]
and communicative meaning as exemplified in discourse (Richards
1986),
Communicative language teaching is an approach that
focusses onal the components ofthe comerunicatveee tenet
of the leaner and isnot resected to grammatical o eens
competence, In this approach, form’ is not primase, bee
‘functions’ are primary. Tt holds the view tat Hanctigs”
the framework thvough Which ‘orm are taught
Strong and Weak Versions
There are two versions of communicative language teaching:
strong and weak. Howatt distinguishes between the two versions
in the following words
“There is ina sense, a ‘strong’ version ofthe communicative
approach and a ‘weak’ version. The weak version which has
become more or less standard practice in the last ten years,
stresses the importance of providing learners with opportunities
fo use their English for communicative purposes and
Communities ArroachoTeding tng fa
acteristic tems 1 inept sch sing
iter peogram of language the th nw
Snmrictive ching om ciher hae a i
that angunse i seared through communication sore
rotmerlya question facing aneastng tat
fake language, ut of simchtng the deere se
faagoase 290M sll. the former cou bra
‘eaming t0 use’ English, the later ens “wring Eaeg
yearn i
Features ofthe Communicate Approach
“The major distinctive features of the commuriaive approach
as contested With the audio-ingual method athe ee
1. Meaning is paramount.
Dialogues, if used, centre around communictive
> Tandtions and ste not nonally memosaed,
43. Contextualization isa premise.
44. Language learning is learning to communicate.
5. Effective communication is sought
6. Drilling may occur, but pesiphealy.
7. Comprehensive pronunciation i sought
{8 Any device whichelps the lamersisaccepled {varying
"according to their age interest, et) _
9, Attempts to communicate may be encouraged from
very beginning a
10. Judicious use of native language is accepted whe
feasible. :
11, Translation may be used where students need or benefit
eons 7 first day, if
aut from the
12. Reading and writing can start f
oa stem willbe leamed best hough
18. ‘The argettingusics st
rece of sgn SI
cor ingltjstem flv APPRot Teaching of English
5 Linguist
a ra methstogy
vrouingveeterinet hy any consideration of content,
fe ce ‘hich maintains interest,
function oF meaning
12.Teachers help learners #9 any way that motivates them
fevwsork with the language.
18. Language is created by the Individual after thorough
tal and error.
18. Fluency, and acceptable Ianguage is the primary goal:
secrecy: judged notin the abstract but in context
2? Siustents ate expected fo interact with other people,
‘hough pair and group work, or in their writings.
The teacher cannot know exactly what language the
students will use
122. Intinsic motivation will spring feom an interest in what
fs being communicated by the language.
Procedures in Communicative Language Teaching—While
Presenting a Language Function
1. The teacher presents a brief dialogue or several mini
dialogues preceded by motivation and a discussion of
the function and situation,
2. The teacher allows oral practice of each utterance of the
dialogues either in chorus, in groups or individually.
‘The oral practice is preceded by the teacher model
3. The teacher sets questions based on the dialogues
practised and elicits answers.
4. The teacher sets questions on the students personal
‘experiences,
He reads one of the basic communicative expressions
or one of the structures which illustrates or exemplifies
the function,
Givesa few more examples ofthe functions using pictures
real objets or dramatisation to clanfy the meaning of
the function,
Communicative Approves to Teaching Engh 45
rote fhe Teacher |
tn communicative language teaching, the teacher neds vy
adopt a vatety of tle. These cae the felony, 7
= _Asageneraloverser of his students earning, thet
ing th ache
ints 0 coordinate the aie woth ty
1 coherent progression, leading towards yroser on
imnicative ability. J ao
= sa clsrcom manages es espero pn
Sivtes into esse snd for octng he ee
Sisco onsnbea ws urea
— Inmany activites, hesnay perons the fa eo
thelangonge instartor tev remee se ere
cocoa dre contol oer he ease pee,
elute and coat tan an
Tn other, he wil not Intervene aftr iting the
proceeding, but wil et ering abe pe eh
Eicpendat cctv ora ode Dest
| When such an activi in progres he may aca»
Mtoctant or edna beping'ebee nears) Bt tap
| Sihomevesbot the dasoum in esto nonter tg
| fowagl wd wetted ol Oe anes ose Po
for parang fotze ening ates
“= He wl sometimes wih oparcpate nan act as
‘Seconmutantor wit te lames ni le been
SSESESEL ten poser ne lngunge nu ing
| thea nae for ekg avy Bom te nes
themveles >
Advantages ’ ;
‘The following are the advantages of the communicative
language approach:
4 More language practice: Pupils get more langusge practice
‘As most of the work in the communicative approach is done in
* pairs apd small groups, pupils have more opportunities tointeract
in the foreign language.
2. More involvement: Pupils are more involved in leasing,166 Tosching of Pnelich
They feel eocure arnt ds not feel shy of speaking English in a
mall group, Thus they get confidence to speak the language.
‘They share their nfeae with others. They get more opportunities
to eaprese their oven indivicuality
3. Fluency in speech: As pupils concentrate on speaking,
Enelish ther become fluent speakets. They lear the appropriate
suse of lancuage
4 Co-operative relationships: The teacher’s role in the
teaching learning process is Tess dominant. There are more
cppertunities for coveperative relationship to emerge, both
[etween the feacher and pupils, and among pupils.
Limitations of the Communicative Approach fo Language
Teaching,
1. The suggestion that grammatical structure might better
be subsumed under various functional categories will
make us pay considerably less attention to the overt
presentation and discussion of grammatical rules than
wwe traditionally did.
2. The use of authentic language may make it difficult for
a non-native speaking teacher who is not Very proficient
in the second language to teach dialogues elfectively.
Drills, rehearsed excercise and discussions of grammatical
rules are much simpler for the average non-native
speaking teacher to start with
Problems
‘Some of the problems of the communicative approach are
2s follows:
1. Teacher's competence: Itis doubtful whether an average
teacher of English can make a success ofthis approach,
‘Some teachers themselves cannot speak English fluently.
In any case the teacher has to be reoriented to use the
new approach.
2. Neglect of reading skill: With its over-emphasis on
‘ral communication the communicative approach neglects
reading. This drawback needs to be removed.
7 Fossinissming ion thelanguageas
Communicative Approach to Teaching English V67
3. Over-crowded classes: The Indian «lassrnmins ate
overflowing with pupils, It is not rasy to seat them
properly for paie work an grip work
4, Unanswered questions: According, to Kicharty an
Rogers the following questions eegarding the
communicative approach age still debatable,
() Con the communicative approach be applied at all
levels in a language programme?
Gi) Ts communicative approach equally suited to ESL.
(English as a second language) and EPL (Fnglish a
18 foreign language) situations
(il) Does the communicative approach require grammar-
based syllabus to be abondoned or merely revised?
Difference between the Traditional Approaches and
Communicative Approaches
Traditional Comnanitioe
srpronces appro,
Tsone communication
Caracestes
Sstructoredystem of
grammatical pater.
Selectionof _igdonecnlinguste onthe asisof what
a citer Engng sent
= Teter cet
tordetogettigs done
sequenng is determined onother
signe Hogiegnans pour”
tems imeaningand interes.
coat aimstocoverthe——_tcoverony what
Et tapitreot thelr aedsand
IMgugesrctre ——andoessimpotnt
byspstenatilnese
Progression.
the variety ot
View oflanguage Language issen ss
ne nied ent wih
Taedgeammaeal
mes and coe
Eitan words for
emmucaieeeeds.
languagets accepted an
fd som as determined
by thecharacterat
particule168 Teaching of Engtich
remineeveryday
tote formal
bgfail Frnungeisempaiced
= Tongs rntingandweriting spoken
coat
studentceneed
paca onset nd ine
fk Tonter/nun— teachercentered
Aneto
= re mectons complete uleanees are
AGaeemomsel —Seenassuch ther than
Sontndgrammae jst wrong
sosmiy, mental ube trl
Seco’ fieentyconcnt+— inthat the content ofthe
oral ——Etonentheformof erancesisemphasised
amine Shtemmcesrathrtian —ratherthan the fem.
cnthecontent
CHAPTER 7
The Situational Approach to
Language Teaching
In the situational approach English is taught tothe child in the
‘same way he learns his mother-tongue. Prof. P. Guerey while
explaining the Direct Method says, “The principles may be
explained as the associating of words with things or things with
context, idea, event or whole situation.”
In the opinion of H. Champion, “we employ means which
make the students understand (events, ations, pictures, context
and situations) they think in the same manner they do so in
their mother-tongue. It is therefore necessary that English should
‘also be taught in the same manner by establishing a link between
new words and real situations. The problem now is how to
‘reate situations in the classroom.
Main Features of the Situational Approach
"1. The new word is incidently intoduced in the class by
the teacher.
2. Whatever the child understands and expresses is
connected with his own life
3. The teacher offers many opportunities to the students
to associate the meaning of new words with the
corresponding situations
». Appropriate material are used to create proper situations.
S. Contant rept seed
eval done psn and aps
2. Totencher pu lege rumber fqn bot he
created situation and himself answers them.170. Teaching of English
Principles of Situational Approach
Ta the wonds of A.S Hoenby, the situational approach is
Ises om the fllsing principles.
1. Princes of Attention and Interest
“hawaing to Ross “interest i Intent attention and attention
i itenest in action “The feacher ean arouse the interest of the
Icamer ty this method of presentation. It is sound linguistic
ponsle that in language teaching we should begin with the
Exmuliae objects, relations, activities and situations as these are
text book or story book.
Likely to arouse more interest than
2. Principle of Acton Chain
Action chain isa sequence of activities inside the classroom.
to present the meaning of new words content words or action
swords. These action chains are the essenatial procedure for the
rect association between the word and the situation But caution
trust be used with this approach since this procedure if carried
far too long tends to become boring,
3. Principles of Variety & Simplicity
‘The action chain selected by the class must be practical.
There must be variety and simplicity and classroom activities
should net tend to become uninteresting. Repetition has to be
there but the changing situations should be such tha they enable
the students to understand through the meanings.
4. Using Pictures to Create New Situations
Pictures may be used to supply situations which are outside
the classroom, because every picture tells its own story. The
Picture may be designed in a series which can show the stages
in the story and the teacher can put questions on that.
5. The Principles of Hearing
In this approach the language teacher should do a lot of
talking. The pinciples involved is thatthe students must hear
and hear repeatedly al the words thatthe teacher is using. The
pupils should also do a lot of talking about the action being.
performed.
The Situational Approach to Language Learning 74
In the words of Hornby, the situational approach makes a
feat demand upon the teacher ile munt hare realy ison
‘nd eresteasituation—he must himself be fluent int lange
Procedure of the Approach
1. For presenting a new vocabulary and syntax teacher
‘can make use of objects avaliable inthe classroom
2. The teacher can use the objects for presenting and
recognising affirmative, negative and interrogative fort of
speech eg What ot?
3. The teacher can ask questions pointing to the object in
the class. Is this a letter?” rs * 9
4. Situation canbe crete by the teacher using imperative
for eg. Iam closing the door. Am I going to lose the door?
Merits of the Approach
1. Te follows the principle of interest.
2. Action chain make the clas lively
3. It follows the principles of variety and simplicity.
4. It makes use of leaning through hearing,
5. It makes use of teaching aids
6. It ays emphasis a learning through pl
Demerits of the Situational Approach
1. The approach can be used to teach wel selected words
and sentence pattems
Its suitable for teaching lower classes.
Its not possible to create situations for all words.
Itis not possible to teach text book through this method,
It is diffiult to teach prose, poetry and composition
‘through this method,
Suggestions in Using the Approach
“According to Homby, a teacher teaching by the situational
should keep the following points in mind:172 Teaching of English
1.
All new words must be presented clearly to the class in
meaningful situations that make the meaning clear.
The pupils must make numerous repetition before being
asked to produce a situation.
Action chains of long sequence
action.
The teacher must be efficient enou; gh to use the approach.
oduced in the class should not be too much,
h which is able to being assimilated by the
are preferable to isolated
Material intr’
only that muc
pupils.