AMITY UNIVERSITY HARYANA

Regulations

for

Conduct of Examinations,
Scheme of Evaluation and
Discipline Among Students in Examinations

1
 CONTENTS

Page

1. Definitions 4

2. Examination Committee 7

3 Examination – Sub Committee 8

4 Moderation Board for Moderating Question Papers 10

5 Examination Discipline Committee 10

6 Results Moderation Committee 11

7 Controller of Examinations 11

8 Course Evaluation 12

9 Attendance and Computation of Attendance 14

10 Make-up of Deficiency in Attendance 15

11 Examination Fees 16

12 Grading System 17

13 Passing Criteria 21

14 Re-appearing 19

15 Improvement of Score 24

16 Appointment and Qualifications of Paper Setters 25

17 Setting of Question Papers 29

18 Conduct of Examinations 30

19 Supplementary Examinations 30

20 Appointment of Amanuensis for writing examinations 31

21 Disciplinary Control of students in relation to Examinations 32

22 Reporting of Unfair means Cases & Disciplinary Proceedings 35

2
23 Penalties 38

24 Inspection of Examination Centres 39

25 Re-Examination/Quashing/Revision of Results 39

26 Re-checking/Re-evaluation of Answer Books 41

27 Refund of Examination Fees 42

28 Award of Degrees, Diplomas, certificates etc. 43

29 Withdrawal of Degree/Diploma 44

30 Residual Provisions 45

3
 AMITY UNIVERSITY
——— Haryana ———

Regulations on Conduct of Examinations, Scheme of Evaluation of Student

Performance and Discipline among Students in relation to University Examinations

1. DEFINITIONS:

(1) In these Regulations, unless the context otherwise requires –

1. ―Academic Year‖ is a period of nearly 12 months devoted to

completion of requirements specified in the Scheme of Teaching and the
related examinations.

2. ―Amity Common Admission Test (AMCAT)‖ shall mean the Common

Admission Test conducted by the University for admission to Academic
Programmes of the University.

3. ―Annual Grade Point Average(AGPA)‖ means the Annual Grade

Point Average under Annual Examination system.

4 ―Answer Book‖ means the document containing the answer or answers

as given by a candidate during examination to the question or questions
contained in the question paper meant for the said examination and
include a part of an answer book.

5 ―Audit Course‖ shall mean a Course Unit opted by a student

out of Course Units for which the student is not awarded
grades and does not earn credits.

6 ―Board of Examiners‖ shall mean a Board constituted with the approval

of the Vice Chancellor for the conduct of practical examinations,
workshops, viva-voce examination and evaluation of student
performance at the Departments and Constituent Units of the University.

7 Common Admission Test (CAT) shall mean the Common Admission

Test conducted for admission to Academic Programmes of the
University.

8 ―Course Unit ― is a component of an Academic Programme for which a

syllabus and required number of contact hours per week are specified

9 ―Course Code‖ shall mean a curricular component identified by a

designated code number normally consisting of a string of alphanumeric
characters.
4
10 ―Course Credits‖ shall mean an integer number indicating the
weightage assigned to a Course Unit, project, research work or any other
academic component, on the basis of contact hours per week on all
learning activities.

11 ―CGPA‖ shall mean the cumulative grade point average of a student.

12 ―End Term Examination‖ means an examination conducted by the

Amity University Haryana at the end of year/semester/trimester as
prescribed in Scheme of Evaluation of a programme.

13 ―Examination Centre‖ means any institution, or part thereof, or any

other place, fixed by the University for the purpose of holding its
examinations and includes the entire premises attached thereto.

14 ―Examination Committee‖ means the Examination Committee

constituted by the Academic Council to devise detailed procedure for an
efficient, transparent and fair evaluation of students, including
coordination of activities relating to conduct of examinations.

15 ―Examination Discipline Committee‖ shall mean the Committee

constituted by the Vice Chancellor at the University to consider and
decide the cases relating to the acts of misconduct, misbehaviour,
indiscipline and/or use of unfair means by the students in the
examinations.

16 ―External Examiner‖ shall mean a person who is not in the employment

of the Amity University Haryana or its Constituent Units and is appointed
as an Examiner.

17 ―Examination Sub- Committee‖ shall mean a Sub- Committee

constituted at each Constituent Unit by the University

18 ―Internal Examiner‖ shall mean an Examiner for practical, viva-voce,

workshop practice, seminars etc. including a paper setter and evaluator
who is a teacher of the University and its Constituent Units.

19 ―Invigilator‖ means a person who assists the Superintendent of the

Examination Centre in conducting and supervising an examination at a
center.

20 ―Maximum Registration Period‖ shall mean the maximum period

specified in the Scheme of Teaching and Evaluation for a degree,
diploma and certificate programme for which a candidate may be
registered.

5
21 ―Minimum Registration Period‖ shall mean the minimum period
specified in the Scheme of Teaching and Evaluation of a degree, diploma
and certificate programme for which a candidate may be registered.

22 ―Ordinances‖ shall mean the Ordinances of Amity University Haryana

23 ―PG Diploma‖ shall mean the Post Graduate Diploma in areas approved
by the Executive Council.

24 ―Question Paper‖ means a document containing the question(s) to be

administered at an examination to be answered by a candidate.

25 ―Results Moderation Committee‖ shall mean the Committee appointed

by the University to moderate grades/ marks awarded by the Evaluators
in different course units at a given level of a curriculum.

26 ―Scheme of Teaching and Examination‖ shall mean the scheme of

teaching and examination for a programme as approved by the Academic
Council.

27 ―Scrutinizer‖ means a person engaged to check the compilation of the

result by comparison of award lists and the result sheets prepared by the
office.

28 ―Semester System‖ means a modus operandi of

teaching/learning/evaluation of student performance in an academic
programme of the University and its Constituent Units in segments in an
Academic Year.

29 ―SGPA‖ shall mean the Semester Grade Point Average.

30 ―Statutes‖ shall mean the Statutes of Amity University Haryana

31 ―Superintendent of an Examination Centre‖ means a person appointed

by the University to conduct and supervise its examinations held or to be
held at a centre, and includes an Additional Superintendent or Associate
Superintendent of such centre.

32 ―Tabulator‖ means a person, specially engaged for tabulating the result

from award lists and the result sheets prepared by the Office.

33 ―Teaching Experience‖ denotes teaching experience in the subject in an

institution recognized by the University.

34 ―Trimester Grade Point Average (TGPA)‖ means the Trimester Grade

Point Average in trimester examinations of the programmes where
trimester system is followed.

6
 35 ―Year‖ means the academic year.

(2) Definitions specified in the Act, the Statutes and the Ordinances shall apply
unless the context requires otherwise.

(3) ―He‖ & ―His‖ imply ―he‖/ ―she‖ and ―His‖/ ―Her‖ respectively.

(4) Wherever Trimester or annual system is followed, TGPA and AGPA shall be
assessed in the same manner as SGPA and regulations for promotion etc.
will apply accordingly.

2. EXAMINATION COMMITTEE

(1) There shall be an Examination Committee at the University level constituted

by the Academic Council.

(2) The composition of the Examination Committee shall be as under:

(i) Pro-Vice Chancellor - Chairperson

(ii) Deans of Faculties/ Heads of Constituent

Units not exceeding eight nominated by
the Vice Chancellor

(iii) Controller of Examinations -Member Secretary

The tenure of the Examination Committee shall be two years. Two third
members will form the quorum of the meeting. There will be at least one
meeting of the Examination Committee in each semester. The decisions of
the Examination Committee shall be placed before the Academic Council.

(3) Functions of the Examination Committee shall be :

(a) To frame detailed guidelines and procedures for an efficient,

transparent and fair evaluation of students performance and conduct
of examinations as well as for tabulators/programmers for preparing
the results of the examinations.

(b) To supervise generally all the examinations of the University and

issue such directions as it may consider necessary for conduct of
examinations.

(c) To review from time to time the results of the University

examinations and submission of reports thereon to the Academic
Council.

(d) To make recommendations to the Academic Council for the

improvement of the examination system.

7
 (e) To appoint such number of sub-committees as it may think fit, and in
particular, may delegate to any one or more persons or sub-
committee(s), its powers to deal with examination matters.

(f) To consider the complaints received against Officers and Staff

engaged for conduct of examinations and recommend to the Vice
Chancellor about the action to be taken against the concerned
person(s).

(g) To consider and recommend the rates of remuneration for the

Examiners, Superintendents of Examination Centres and other staff
engaged on examination duty, Tabulators and Collators etc
associated with the examination duty.

(h) To consider any written report/ representation/complaints received

within seven days after completion of the examination regarding
setting up of question paper etc. along with specific
recommendations of the Examination Sub-Committees of
Departments/Constituent Units and to recommend for consideration
of the Vice Chancellor the action to be taken against any examiner/
paper-setter/Moderator in cases of mistakes/ omissions/ negligence/
leakage in paper-setting/ moderation/ evaluation etc,

(l) To investigate the cases of understandable divergence in the results

of any Course Unit. For this purpose, the Examination Committee
may itself scrutinize the answer books or may order their scrutiny by
other person(s), and may also call an explanation from the examiner
concerned for the divergence of marks. If after the investigation, the
Committee is of the opinion that such divergence is due to leakage
of paper, personal favouritism or animosity, it may recommend to
the Vice Chancellor such action as it may deem fit such as debar the
examiner/evaluator from examinership permanently or for a
specified period, a revaluation of the answer books etc.

3. EXAMINATION SUB - COMMITTEE

(1) Each Department/Constituent Unit will constitute an Examination Sub-

Committee to oversee the examinations at the concerned
Department/Constituent Unit. The composition of the Sub-Committee shall be
as under:

(i) Head of Institute Chairperson

(ii) Two senior faculty members of the

Institute Members

8
(2) Functions of Examination Sub - Committee

The Examination Sub - Committee shall have the following major functions :

(a) Prepare tentative Examination Schedule and submit the same to the
Controller of Examinations for approval and notification.

(b) Prepare panels of paper setters, examiners, evaluators and submit the
same to the Controller of Examinations for approval by the Vice
Chancellor. It will also suggest the names of external experts for
moderation of question papers.

(c) Make arrangements for printing of Question Papers for internal class
tests and other components of internal assessment.

(d) Keep the Question Papers received from the Controller of

Examinations in safe custody and keep proper record of the used and
unused question papers.

(e) Arrange printing of Answer Books on standard format provided by the

University and maintain record of used and unused answer books.

(f) Scrutinize the examination forms of the students and determine

eligibility of students for taking examination. In case any student is
found ineligible, it will record reasons of ineligibility against each
student.

(g) Ensure compliance of provisions of Regulations and Guidelines

relating to conduct of examinations.

(h) Make all necessary arrangements for conduct of Examinations

including display of examinations schedule, seating arrangements,
security arrangements, if required, and for recording attendance of
students.

(i) Appoint amanuensis for visually handicapped and disabled students

who are unable to write with their own hands.

(j) Appoint Invigilators (minimum two in a room) and other supporting

staff; and supervise their functioning.

(k) Ensure smooth conduct of Examination.

(l) Report immediately cases of use of unfair means by the students in

the examinations, if any, to the Controller of Examinations for
consideration by the Examination Discipline Committee of the
University.
9
 (m) Arrange spot evaluation of answer books from the Evaluators
approved by the Vice Chancellor, if desired by the University.

4. MODERATION BOARD FOR MODERATION OF QUESTION PAPERS

(1) There shall be a Moderation Board constituted by the Vice Chancellor as

under for one or more courses:

(a) Head of Department/ Centre /Institution Chairperson

(b) Senior most Professor/ senior most teacher and

the teaching faculty of the discipline concerned.
Member

(c) Two experts in the discipline/specialization

of whom one shall be external Members

(d) Controller of Examinations Member Secretary

Provided that the Heads of Institutes may co-opt other experts not exceeding
two, if required.

(2) Three members shall constitute the quorum for meetings.

(3) The tenure of the Moderation Board shall be two years.

(4) Functions of the Moderation Board shall be:

(a) To ensure that question papers are strictly in accordance with the
course contents and the instructions, if any;

(b) To remove ambiguity in the language of questions, if any;

(c) To moderate/reframe the questions so as to give opportunities to

students of varying abilities;

(d) To ensure proper coverage of course contents and indicate weightage/

marks for each question or part/parts thereof, time prescribed and to
correct errors, if any.

5. EXAMINATION DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

(a) There shall be an Examination Discipline Committee at the University level

constituted by the Vice Chancellor to consider the cases of misconduct,
misbehaviour of students and their use of unfair means in examinations and
disorderly conduct of examinations.

10
 (b) The constitution of the Examination Discipline Committee will be as under:

(i) Pro-Vice Chancellor Chairperson

(ii) Two Heads of Institutes.
(iii) One Senior Officer of the University
(iv) Controller of Examinations Member Secretary

The Chairperson may co-opt any Head of Institutes for particular meeting of
the Examination Discipline Committee.

(c) The tenure of the nominated members of the Committee shall be two years.

(d) A member shall be eligible for re-appointment.

(e) Three members present shall constitute the quorum

6. RESULTS MODERATION COMMITTEE

(1) The University will constitute a Results Moderation Committee for each
Programme/course as under:

(i) Pro-Vice Chancellor - Chairperson

(ii) Head of Department/Constituent Unit
(iii) One Senior Faculty member from each broad discipline
(iv) Controller of Examinations

(2) The functions of Results Moderation Committee are as under:

(i) The Committee shall scrutinize the statistics of results prepared by the
Controller of Examinations and if need be, moderate the same after
satisfying itself that the results on the whole and in various subjects
are in conformity with the usual standards before declaration of
results.

(ii) The Committee shall bring to the notice of the Vice Chancellor lapse
or omission on the part of the paper setter and/or the examiners, if any.
It will also suggest steps to be taken by the University to rectify the
same as well as the action to be taken in any case where the result is
unbalanced.

(3) The recommendations of the Moderation Committee shall be placed before

the Vice Chancellor for approval.

7. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS

(1) The Controller of Examinations shall be a whole time Officer of the

University.

11
 (2) The Controller of Examinations shall perform the following functions:

(a) Subject to the superintendence of the Examination Committee, and

Examination Sub-Committees, he shall conduct all the examinations
of the University and shall make all other arrangements therefor and
be responsible for the due execution of all processes connected
therewith.

(b) He shall be ex-officio Member Secretary of the Examination

Committee and such other Committee(s) as may be constituted by
the University, but he shall not, by virtue of this sub-section, be
entitled to vote. He shall be bound to place before such
Committee(s) all such information as may be necessary for
transaction of its business.

(c) He shall be responsible for the due custody of the records pertaining
to evaluation, examinations and related activities.

(d) He shall collect information from the Departments/ Constituent

Units of the University, as may be necessary, for the discharge of
his duties.

(e) He shall also perform such other duties as may be prescribed in the
Guidelines on Conduct of Examinations and Evaluation of Students
Performance from time to time, by the Executive Council or
Academic Council or other authorities of the University.

(f) While he, for any reason, is unable to act or the office of the
Controller of Examinations falls vacant, all the duties of the Office
shall be performed by such person as may be appointed by the Vice
Chancellor, until the Controller of Examinations resumes his duties
or the vacancy is filled.

8. COURSE EVALUATION

(1) The Course structures, and examinations shall normally be based on

Semester System. However, the Academic Council may approve Trimester/
Annual system for specified programmes.

(2) In addition to end term examinations, student shall be evaluated for his
academic performance in a course through case discussion/ presentation/
analysis, practical, home work assignments, term papers, projects, field
work, seminars, quizzes, class tests or any other mode as may be prescribed
in the syllabi. The basic structures of each course shall be prescribed by the
Board of Studies and approved by the Academic Council.

12
 (3) Each course shall have a number of credits assigned to it depending upon
the academic load of the course which shall be assessed on the basis of
weekly contact hours of lecture, tutorial and laboratory classes, field study
and/or self study. The credits for the project and the dissertation shall be
based on the quantum of work expected.

(4) Depending upon the nature of the programme, the components of internal
assessment may vary. However, the following suggestive table indicates
the distribution of marks for various components in a semester:

Component of evaluation Frequency Code Weightage(%)

Case Discussion/Presentation/Analysis 1-3 C 10-15
Home Assignment 1-3 H 5-10
Project 1 P 10-15
Seminar 1-2 S 5-10
Viva – Voce 1-2 V 5-10
Quiz 1-3 Q 5-10
Class Test (s) 1-2 CT 20
Term Paper 1 TP 10-15
End – Semester Examination 1 EE 60
Total 100

The above components for continuous evaluation, in addition to the class

test(s) and their weightage shall be selected so as to have a combined
weightage of 20 marks. The total number of components for continuous
evaluation, including class test(s) should be 3-4. The distribution of
weightage for each internal assessment component shall be decided by the
concerned Board of Studies and approved by the Academic Council
ensuring that the weightage of all components of internal assessment does
not exceed 40% and term end examinations carry weightage of not less than
60%.

(5) The project and dissertation shall be evaluated by Board of Examiners

through seminar(s), presentation(s), report submission(s) and the viva-voce
examination.

9. AUDIT COURSE

A student who registers for audit course(s) shall be eligible to take examinations
provided the attendance requirement of the course unit is duly certified by the Head
of Department/Constituent Unit to have been met. The audit course(s) shall be
shown in the final Grade sheets /Marks sheets under a distinct head of ―Audit
Course(s)‖. However, a student shall neither be entitled to any credits for such
course(s), nor these shall be considered for the purpose of declaration of results.

13
10. ATTENDANCE

(1) Every student shall be required to achieve 100% attendance in all the
lectures, tutorials and practicals and participate in seminars arranged in the
Institutes during the programme. However, to account for late joining or
other contingencies such as prolonged illness, accidents, tragedy in the
family etc., a relaxation up to a maximum of 25% can be granted. Thus, the
attendance requirement for appearing at the examinations shall be a
minimum of 75% of the classes actually held in each course units.
Attendance in seminars, tutorials, practicals etc. is compulsory. In
exigencies, permission shall be taken by the student for absence.

(2) If a student is found to be continuously absent from the classes without any
information for a period of 15 days, a notice may be sent to the student
about his unauthorized absence under intimation to his guardian/parents. If
he still remains absent unauthorizedly for another 15 days after the date of
issue of the notice, the name of such a student shall be struck off from the
rolls. Such a student may, however, apply for re-admission which may be
considered by the Head of Department/Constituent Unit as per prescribed
procedure, and only after his permission, the student shall be re-admitted on
payment of prescribed re-admission fee, under intimation to the University.

(3) A student with less than 75% of attendance in the lectures, seminars and
practicals, separately in each course-unit in a semester/trimester/year, shall
be detained from appearing at the examinations of relevant course unit(s).
The Vice Chancellor may, however, consider written requests made on very
genuine grounds for the condonation of deficiency in attendance up to 5%
on the recommendations of the Head of Department/ Constituent Unit,
before the commencement of the examinations. Under no circumstances, the
student shall be allowed to sit for the examination of relevant Course Unit(s)
if his attendance in concerned course unit is below 70%.

11. COMPUTATION OF ATTENDANCE:

(1) Attendance at lectures, tutorials, practicals, clinicals, sessionals, if any, held

during the academic session shall be counted.

(2) Attendance at NCC/NSS camp, Amity Cadet Corps/ Amity Military

Training Camp, seminars/workshops organized by other
Institutions/Universities as approved by the University or any such other
training organized by the University during the session shall be taken as full
attendance at lectures/ practicals/ tutorials on each such day of camp/
training and the days of journey to such camp/ training (excluding the
period of holidays/vacations) .

14
 (3) Participation as a member of the University/ Constituent Unit team in any
inter-University competition games & sports and/or other extra curricular
activities shall be taken as full attendance on the days of such competition
and the days of journey for participating therein.

(4) Participation as a member of a recognized/approved team in any

Competition shall be taken as full attendance. The period will also include
the days of actual coaching, competition and the days of journey for
participating therein.

(5) In determining the exact number of minimum requisite attendance in

lectures, tutorials, seminars, moots, practicals, sessionals etc. fraction shall
be ignored.

(6) For re-admission of a student whose name was struck off from the rolls due
to continuous absence from the classes without information, attendance in
lectures, tutorials, practicals etc. in that semester/trimester/year prior to re-
admission shall be counted.

12. MAKE-UP OF DEFICIENCY IN ATTENDANCE

(1) Each Department/Constituent Unit of the University will prescribe

― Guided Self Study Course‖ for the course units in which the students
failed or are detained due to shortage of attendance in a semester and
arrange counselling sessions for the students on week ends and holidays
in the same odd or even semesters.

(2) The students who are detained due to shortage of attendance in any subject
of a semester, shall register with their Department/Constituent Unit for
guided self study course in the beginning of next semester/trimester/year
scheduled for next batch of students. They will be required to pay a fee
per subject as prescribed by the Department/Constituent units.

(3) Such students will have to attend contact classes as and when scheduled by
the Department/Constituent Unit on week ends / holidays in the relevant
semester to complete the package of study for the course designed by the
Department/Constituent Unit.

(4) The Departments/Constituent Units may prescribe term papers / home

assignments which the students will submit to their teachers subject-wise
within the due dates.

(5) The regularity in attending the classes and prompt submission of

assignments by due date will determine whether a debarred or detained
candidate is permitted to take the re-examination or not. The schedule for
regular collection and submission of term paper/ home assignments will be
announced by the Department/ Constituent Unit.
15
 (6) Only those who register for Guided Self Study Course and complete the
requirements as prescribed by the Department/Constituent Units will be
permitted to take the examination in the respective subject when the
examinations of such Course Units are conducted in normal schedule along
with next batch of students. The scheme of re-examination will be
announced by the University on receipt of report from the
Department/Constituent Unit.

13. EXAMINATION FEES

(1) The examination fees, if any, approved by the Finance Committee shall be
payable by the students of Departments/ Constituent Units for various
examinations.

(2) A student who, due to sickness or otherwise is unable to present himself at

an examination, shall not be entitled to receive a refund of his fee. Provided
that the Vice Chancellor, if he is satisfied about the genuineness, or merit of
it, may order for adjustment of fee towards the immediately next
examination.

(3) Application for such adjustment from a candidate shall be accompanied by a

Medical Certificate of illness, if applicable, not later than ten days from the
date of commencement of the examination at which the candidate was to
appear.

Provided, however, that a candidate shall not be entitled to the adjustment of

examination fee mentioned above if he changes the faculty or his course
unitt in case of any examination.

(4) Examination and other fees of a candidate whose application for appearing
at an examination has been rejected for some reason, or who could not
furnish his form within the prescribed date, necessary fees having been paid
in University account, may be refunded after a deduction of a sum as
specified by the University. Examination fee of a candidate who dies before
appearing at the examination shall be refunded in full to his guardian or his
successor.

(5) The entire fees paid by a candidate whose application for appearing at an
examination is cancelled on account of producing fraudulent documents or
giving false particulars, or is debarred/ detained from taking examination
due to shortage of attendance or otherwise shall stand forfeited.

16
14. GRADING SYSTEM

(1) The level of students academic performance as the aggregate of continuous

evaluation and end term examination shall be reflected by letter grades on a
ten point scale according to the connotation as per Table –A

TABLE -A
Grade Qualitative Meaning Grade Point Attached
A+ Outstanding 10
A Excellent 9
A- Very Good 8
B+ Good 7
B Above Average 6
B- Average 5
C+ Satisfactory 4
C Border Line 3
F Fail 0

(2) General guidelines for award of Grades are:

(i) Evaluation of different components of a Course Unit for each student

shall be initially done in numerical marks.

(ii) The marks of different components viz., internal continuous

assessment of course work, practical etc. and end term examinations
shall be assigned relative weightage as prescribed in curriculum and
scheme of examination of a programme and added. The total marks
obtained shall be out of 100 and the same would be converted into
grades in 10 point scale.

(iii) A+ (A Plus) grade shall not be awarded for percentage of marks less
than 80% under any circumstance. Normally, there will not be
more than 10% (rounded off to integer value) A+ grade in any
Course Unit.

(iv) For award of C+ grade, the minimum percentage of marks shall not
be less than 40% in the case of Post Graduate level programmes and
35% in Under Graduate level programmes.

(v) C grade shall be decided on a case by case basis keeping in view the
consistency of performance, progressive improvement, exceptionally
good performance in semester examination, regularity in attendance
which may be upgraded to C+ or down graded to F grade.

(vi) The results, if considered necessary, shall be moderated by a duly

constituted Results Moderation Committee.

17
 (vii) The procedure for evaluation and award of grades for
Project/Training/Seminar/Comprehensive viva-voce shall be such as
may be decided by the respective Board of Studies

(3) Conversion of numerical marks into letter grades

(a) In order to arrive at the letter grades based on relative grading, the total
marks in a particular course for all the students in the class of more
than 30 students shall be tabulated in a descending order list
(equivalently a histogram). The performance of the class shall be
analysed in terms of average, highest and the lowest marks and dividing
lines between the clusters of students. Gaps and dips between the
clusters and the nature of the clusters will guide in drawing the dividing
lines between the Grades. B and B- bands usually indicate the average
mark.

(b) If the marks obtained by a student of a class of more than 30 students are
not close to normal distribution curve, the marks awarded to a student in
a Course Unit shall be transformed into a normal distribution curve by
using Statistical Method in accordance with Table B to ensure the
uniformity in spread of scores regardless of the nature of curricular
areas.
TABLE – B

Lower Range of Grade Upper Range of

Marks Marks
A+ > x¯ + 1.5 
x¯ + 1.0  < A  x¯ + 1.5 
x¯ + 0.5  < A-  x¯ + 1.0 
x¯ < B+  x¯ + 0.5 
x¯ - 0.5  < B  x¯
x¯ - 1.0  < B-  x¯ - 0.5 
x¯ - 1.5  < C+  x¯ - 1.0 
x¯ - 2.0  < C  x¯ - 1.5 
F  x¯ - 2.0 

The mean ( x¯) and the standard deviation () of marks obtained of
all the students in a course shall be calculated and the grades shall be
awarded to a student depending upon the marks and the mean and
the standard deviation as per table B.

18
 (c) In a class of students upto 30, the minimum cut off for various grades
shall be assessed as given in Table C.

TABLE - C
Minimum Minimum
Percentage of Percentage of
Qualitative Value of
Grade marks for letter marks for letter
Grade
Grade for PG Grade for UG
Programmes. Programmes.
A+ Outstanding 80 80
A Excellent 75 70
A- Very Good 68 65
B+ Good 60 55
B Above Average 52 50
B- Average 45 45
C+ Satisfactory 40 35
C Border Line 35 30
F Fail Less than 35 Less than 30

(d) In the case of non-credit and Audit Courses which are not reckoned
for assessment of SGPA and CGPA, the students shall be awarded
―S‖ Grade for satisfactory performance and ―U‖ Grade for
unsatisfactory performance.

(4) The Semester performance of a student will be indicated as ―Semester

Grade Point Average (SGPA). The SGPA will be weighted average of
Grade Points of all letter grades received by a student for all the Course
units in the semester. The formula for Computing SGPA is given below:

U1 G1+ U2 G2 + U3 G3 + -----------------
SGPA=
U1 + U2 + U3+ -----------------------

Where U1, U2, U3 denote credits associated with courses taken by the
Student and G1,G2,G3 are the Grade Point of the letter grades awarded in
the respective Course. An example of these calculations is given below:

19
 I Semester

Course Associated Grade Credits Grade Point

code Course Unit Awarded earned Point Secured
Credits
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
MAL 101 5 C(+) 5 4 20
CSL 102 4 C 0 3 12
PHP 103 4 A 4 9 36
PHL 104 3 B 3 6 18
MEL 105 4 F 0 0 00
AML 106 4 B(-) 4 5 20
Total 24 16 106

Total associated credits in the semester (total of column 2) = 24

Earned credits in the semester (total of column 4) = 16
Points secured in this semester (total of column 6)= 106

Points secured in the semester 106

SGPA= —————————————— = 4.42
Credit Units in Courses appeared 24

CGPA is not applicable in first semester

II Semester

Course Associated Grade Earned Grade Point

code Course Awarded credits Point Secured
credits
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
MAL 201 5 A(+) 5 10 50
EEL 202 5 B(+) 5 7 35
CYL 203 5 C(+) 5 4 20
CYP 204 4 A 4 9 36
MEL 205 4 B 4 6 24
AML 206 5 C 0 3 15
HUL 207 3 F 0 0 00
Total 31 23 39 180

20
 Associated Credit Units in the semester (total of column 2 ) = 31

Earned Units in the semester (total of column 4 ) = 23

Cumulative associated credit Units (in previous semesters 24 and current

semester 31) = 55. Points Secured in II semester (total of column 6) = 180

Cumulative points secured (total of points secured in 1st semester 106 and
in II semester 180) =286

Points secured in II semester 180

SGPA = —————————————————— =5.806
Credit Units of appeared courses in II semester 31

Cumulative points secured in all passed course in I & II Sem 286

CGPA= —————————————————————————— = 5.20
Cumulative Associated Credit Units in I & II semesters 55

(5) In the case of Trimester or Annual system of evaluation of students

performance, trimester grade point average (TGPA) or Annual Grade Point
Average (AGPA) shall be assessed as per above guidelines.

(6) In final Grade Card will indicate Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA)
which shall be calculated as in Para 14(4) and shall be based only on Grade
Points obtained in courses for which units have been earned.

(7) Conversion from Grade Point Averages to percentages of marks do not have
rigor or rationale. However, an approximate and indicative equivalence
between CGPA and percentage of marks can be assessed by simple
mathematical calculation i.e. CGPA multiplied by 10.

(8) The successful candidates shall be placed in Divisions as below:

CGPA EQUIVALENT DIVISION

8.5 and above First class with Distinction

6.5 but less than 8.5 First Division
5.5 but less than 6.5 for UG programmes Second Division
6.00 but less than 6.5 for PG programmes Second Division

15. PASSING CRITERIA

A student has to fulfill the following conditions to pass any academic programme
of the University:

(1) A student who has earned minimum number of credits prescribed for the
concerned programme as per the Structure, Curriculum and Scheme of
21
 Examinations, shall be declared to have passed the programme of study.
Credit Units for each programme shall be decided by the Board of Studies
of each Institution and shall normally be as follows:

Minimum Maximum
(Average per semester) (Average per semester)

(a) Under Graduate Programmes 25 30

(b) Post Graduate Programmes 30 35
(c) Integrated Programmes 30 35

(2) Each Course Unit shall have two components of evaluation: continuous
internal assessment through ‗Course Work‘ which carries weightage of not
exceeding 40% and the term end examination which will carry weightage of
not less than 60%. For successful completion of a Course Unit, student must
score C+ grade and also a minimum of 30% marks each in continuous
evaluation and end term examination. However, the aggregate marks of
continuous evaluation and end term examination shall not be below 35% for
UG programmes and 40% for PG programmes and the Integrated
Programmes.

(3) One ―Fail‖ (F) Grade in a Course Unit can be permitted in an academic year
provided, the number of earned credit units does not fall below the
minimum number of qualifying credits prescribed in a programme.

(4) However, a student must pass in summer training or project dissertation

(wherever prescribed), by securing at least C+ Grade

(5) Students of both UG and PG programmes should also pass in each term/
semester separately by securing a minimum Semester Grade Point Average
(SGPA) of 5 on a 10 point scale.

(6) For successful completion of a programme, the student should secure a

minimum Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) of 5.5 at the end of
final year of an Under Graduate programme and of 6 at the end of final year
of Post Graduate Programme/Integrated Programme.

(7) A student who has reappeared/repeated the examination of course unit(s),

the marks obtained in the repeat Coure Unit(s) shall be taken into
consideration for calculating the SGPA and CGPA and eligibility for award
of a degree.

(8) A student registered for an audit course may be awarded ―S‖ grade for his
satisfactory performance if his minimum score in audit course is 40% in
Post Graduate and Integrated Programmes and 35% in Under Graduate
Programmes. A ―U‖ (unsatisfactory) Grade will be awarded for his
unsatisfactory performance i.e. if the score is less than 40% in PG/Integrated
programmes and 35% in UG programmes by the concerned teacher. Such
audit course(s) shall be shown in the final Grade Card under a distinct head
22
 of the ―Audit Course(s)‖ However, a student shall neither be entitled to any
credits for such course(s), nor these shall be considered for the purpose of
declaration of results.

16. PROMOTION TO NEXT SEMESTER/YEAR

(1) A student will be registered for the next semester/year of a programme, if

he has obtained -

(a) SGPA of minimum 5 in each of the semesters (in the case of

semester system)

(b) AGPA of minimum of 5 in each of the annual examination(s) (in the

case of annual system)

(c ) SGPA and CGPA between 4 and 5 in not more than two previous
semesters and summer training, if any, prescribed in the semester(s);

(2) A student will be registered to the next semester/year of a programme

provisionally subject to the fulfillment of conditions mentioned in Para
16(1) above, if the result of previous end term examination has not been
declared before commencement of next semester/academic session. If he
fails to fulfill those requirements, his registration will automatically stand
cancelled.

(3) A student will be placed under Academic Probation as mentioned in Para

17. During the period of his Academic Probation, he will make up the
deficiency of minimum SGPA of 5 in each semester and minimum CGPA of
5.5 at an Under Graduate Programme and of 6 at a Post Graduate
Programme/ Integrated Programme at the end of final year by re-appearing
in the end term examinations of relevant Course Units as provisions of sub
Para 15(5).

(4) If a student fails to score SGPA of 4 in any semester and CGPA of 4 in

any academic year, he will be declared ―Fail‖ in that year. He will be
required to repeat the Semester in which his SGPA is less than 4 with the
junior batch of students by taking re-admission. The score secured by such
student in the relevant semester prior to re-admission will not be carried
over on re-admission.

(5) If a student fails to qualify all the Course Units prescribed in a programme,
the maximum permissible number of ―fail‖ in a programme for award of a
Degree, Diploma, Certificate shall be equal to the duration of the
programme in years for award of a Degree. While counting the number of
―Fail‖ Grade, a Course Unit shall be considered as full course unit
irrespective of the number of credits assigned to such course units. The total
credits earned by the students shall not fall below the minimum prescribed
credits as per Para 15(1) after excluding the ―Fail‖ Courses.
23
17. ACADEMIC PROBATION

(1) Every student shall meet the minimum passing requirements during each
year of the programme. In the event of failure to meet these requirements,
he shall be placed in Academic Probation and shall undergo counseling
sessions with the faculty assigned to him. The concerned faculty shall
monitor his performance and shall submit a report on his performance to the
HOD.

(2) If a student fails to secure TGPA/SGPA/AGPA of at least 5 in any

semester/ term or his CGPA at any stage is less than 4, he shall
automatically be on Academic Probation.

(3) If the report of the faculty assigned to a student on academic probation is

found to be unsatisfactory, the student shall be liable to be terminated from
the programme.

(4) A student who is terminated due to unsatisfactory performance shall be

eligible to seek re-admission. In such case, the Regulations relating to
admissions shall apply.

18. RE-APPEARING

(1) A student who has fulfilled the attendance requirements and is eligible to
appear in an Examination, fails to appear in the examination shall be
required to subsequently appear in the examination when scheduled for
next batch of students on payment of prescribed fee.

(2) A student who has not fulfilled the minimum attendance requirement in any
Course Unit(s) shall not be allowed to appear in the end term Examination
of that Course Unit but shall be allowed to subsequently appear in the
examination when scheduled for the next batch of students, on payment of
prescribed examination fee and fulfillment of such eligibility conditions as
prescribed in the Regulations.

(3) A student who fails to secure passing score in internal continuous evaluation
and or term end examination of any Course Unit(s) shall be required to
secure passing Grade in those Course Units by repeating internal continuous
assessment components and or the end term examination(s) in the concerned
Course Unit(s) in which he has failed when these are held in normal
schedule.

(4) A student, who has failed to secure the required passing SGPA i.e. 5 shall,
in order to secure a passing SGPA, apart from fulfilling the requirements of
Para 16 above, has the option to repeat the end term examinations also of
the Course Units of the concerned term in which he desires to improve his
performance, when these examinations are held on normal schedule.

24
 (5) A student who has to reappear/repeat in an end term examination in terms of
provisions made above shall be examined as per the syllabus in the Scheme
of Teaching & Examination and syllabus applicable at the time of joining
the concerned programme. However, in cases where only some minor
modifications have been made in the syllabus of the course(s), and the HOD
of the concerned Department/Institution so certifies, the examination may be
held in accordance with the revised syllabus.

(6) Students who are eligible to re-appear in an examination, or are repeating

the course(s) shall have to apply to the Controller of Examinations to be
allowed to reappear in an examination or to repeat the course(s), and pay the
fees prescribed by the University.

(7) The Departments/Constituent Units may, at their discretion, arrange for

additional teaching for students repeating the examination of course(s)
during the breaks. The modus operandi of such instructions shall be as
notified by the Department/Constituent Unit. Extra fee shall be charged
from such students.

19. IMPROVEMENT OF SCORE

(1) If a student has poor performance in a number of courses in a particular

term, he may at his option, take an academic break for one year, and re-
register for both the semesters of that academic year in the next academic
year. Such a student may have the option of repeating any or all of the
courses in the semester(s) and retain the credits already earned by him in
other course(s).

(2) A student shall be allowed two chances to improve his SGPA and CGPA by
repeating the Semester Examination(s) in the Course Units of his choice
when these examinations are held in normal schedule or in supplementary
examination, if any, when scheduled, in which case his internal evaluations
shall be carried forward. He can alternatively be allowed to do so by
repeating the Course Unit(s) of his choice when they are offered. The marks
obtained in repeat course unit(s) shall be taken into consideration for
calculating the SGPA and CGPA and eligibility for award of a degree.

(3) Improvement in the score of courses completed by a student prior to his

lateral entry in the University shall not be allowed.

20 APPOINTMENT OF PAPER SETTERS, EXAMINERS & EVALUATORS

(1) On the recommendations of the Examination Sub-Committee, the Head of

Department/Constituent Units shall forward to the Controller of
Examinations the panels of internal and external paper setters, examiners
for practical examinations, viva-voce examinations, workshops, etc.,
evaluators of answer books, head examiners, external experts for
moderation of question papers.

25
(2) The Controller of Examinations shall prepare a consolidated panel of paper
setters, examiners, evaluators, moderators, head examiners on the basis of
names received from the Examination Sub- Committees. He may at his
discretion add or delete the name(s) from the panel recommended by the
Examination Sub-Committees.

(3) The Vice Chancellor on the recommendations of the Controller of

Examinations, shall approve the panel of paper setters, examiners,
evaluators, Head Examiners, moderators ordinarily from amongst persons
recommended by the Controller of Examinations. He may, however, appoint
a person whose name is not included in the panel recommended by the
Controller of Examinations, if he is satisfied that the person in question
possesses the minimum qualifications and experience as prescribed in these
regulations.

(4) The qualifications of the paper-setter/ Examiners/Evaluators shall be as

follows ;

S. Examination Qualifications
No
.
1 Post Graduate Experience of teaching the subject at the post graduate
Examinations in all level for at least five years;
faculties other than OR
Law Experience of teaching the subjects at the under
graduate level for at least seven years together with
research / teaching experience at the degree and/post
graduate level or seven years of industry experience
2 LLM Master‘s or higher degree in law and teaching
experience at LL.M level for at least five years , OR
Experience as High Court Judge. OR Standing of at
least ten years at the Bar.
3 Degree examination Teaching the subject at Under Graduate and/or Post
in all faculties other Graduate level for atleast five years in relevant field.
than Engg.
Technology, Law,
Medicine etc.
4 Degree examination Teaching experience at UG/Post Graduate level and or
in faculties of Professional experience of at least five years, or seven
Engineering & years professional experience in relevant area.
Technology
5 Degree examination Teaching experience in the subject at the degree and/or
in the faculty of post graduate level for at least five years.
Medicine
6 LLB Teaching experience of LLB and/or LLM classes for at
least five years
OR
26
 Judicial experience as District Judge for atleast five
years
OR
Standing Council at Bar for atleast ten years.
7 Diploma examination Teaching experience of at least five years of Degree or
in all faculties other Diploma or above classes.
than those in
Medicine, and Post
Graduate Diploma
examination in
Business
Administration
8 Diploma examination A Doctor‘s or Master‘s Degree or a post graduate
in the faculty of Diploma of a recognized University or equivalent
Medicine/Pharmacy/ qualification in the subject and at least five years
Nursing teaching experience in the subject in any University or
College recognized by the Medical Council of
India/Pharmacy Council of India/Nursing Council of
India
9 Post Graduate Master‘s Degree with at least five years teaching
Diploma in Business experience at the degree level or post graduate classes
Administration and in the subject.
equivalent
10 Degree in Masters Degree with five years teaching experience in
Architecture/Planning the relevant area.

(5) The appointment of Paper Setters/ Examiners for practicals/Viva-voce and

Evaluators of answer books and Head Examiners etc., shall be made as per
Guidelines on Conduct of Examinations and Evaluation of Student
Performance.

(6) A viva-voce examination prescribed in a programme shall be conducted by

a board of two examiners of whom one shall be an external examiner and
the other internal examiner.

(7) In case of practical and Viva-Voce examinations at the post graduate level,
external examiner shall be a person not below the rank of an Assistant
Professor and shall not ordinarily be a teacher of the
Department/Constituent Unit. In case of practical and Viva-Voce
examination at the under graduate programmes, the external examiner shall
be a teacher of the subject with not less than three years experience of
teaching the subject at the degree and/or post graduate level.

(8) The internal examiners in case of practical examinations both at the UG

degree and the PG degree level shall be appointed from amongst the
teachers of the University and its Constituent Units whose candidates are to
be examined on the recommendation of the Examination Sub-Committee.

27
(9) Ordinarily at least three Paper-setters shall be appointed for every subject.
They shall normally belong to different Departments/Constituent Units.

(10) No one who is a Paper-setter at any post-graduation examination shall be

appointed as an external Viva-Voce examiner at the examination.

(11) No external examiner shall ordinarily be given examinership for more than
two external practicals. Provided, however, the Controller of Examination
may relax the condition.

(12) In case of under graduate practical examinations, one external examiner

shall not ordinarily examine more than 120 students.

(13) In case of written examinations an examiner shall not ordinarily evaluate /

value more than 250 scripts.

(14) Any person who has acted as an examiner /paper-setter for three
consecutive years, shall ordinarily not be eligible for re-appointment until a
period of one year has elapsed between the year in which he last acted as an
examiner and the year in which he is re-appointed.

Provided that such gap will not be necessary in case of internal

examiners if the number of available eligible examiners in the subject
concerned is less than the number of internal examiners required

Provided also that on the recommendation of the Examination Sub-

Committee, a specialist or expert may be continued for two more years
after the expiry of the three years period without a gap.

(15) An examiner may be discontinued any time even before the expiry of the
three year period if in the opinion of the Controller of Examinations his
work is found to be unsatisfactory.

(16) An examiner‘s work shall be deemed to be unsatisfactory if (i) mistakes of

such a nature are found in his work in the course of checking and scrutiny
that affect the result or (ii) he is found to have delayed the work without
good cause or (iii) he has an adverse report from the Head Examiner, or (iv)
any external expert so nominated by the Controller of Examinations or (v) in
the opinion of the Examination Committee and or the Controller of
Examinations or any Authority of the University, there are reasonable
doubts about his integrity or suspicion that he is accessible to examinees or
their relations and (vi) if there are serious complaints against his paper e.g
that the paper was much above or below the standard or contained questions
outside the prescribed course or the breach of any such condition.

28
 (17) The paper-setter, while setting the question papers, shall draw a
memorandum of instructions for the guidance of the examiners/ evaluators
so that the evaluation of answer books may be in conformity/uniformity
with the standard of the paper setter.

(18) In the case of programmes where thesis is permissible in lieu of a paper or a

project, there shall be a Board of two examiners for evaluating the thesis/
project. The maximum number of marks for the thesis shall be equally
divided between the two examiners each of whom shall mark the thesis
independently. If the evaluation of these two examiners differs by 20%, the
project report/ thesis shall be referred to the third examiner, (other than a
teacher of the University). The average of two (of the three) awards nearest
to each other and to the best advantage of the candidate shall be taken as the
correct evaluation.

(19) No person shall act as a paper-setter or examiner or moderator either in

theory, viva-voce or practical examination, if any of his relations is taking
the examination. Provided, however, this provision shall not debar a person
from acting as an examiner for practical examination at a centre other
thanthat at which his relation is appearing.

(20) No person shall act as tabulator for any examination, if any of his relations
is appearing or has appeared at that examination.

21. SETTING OF QUESTION PAPERS

(1) The syllabus in each paper shall be demarcated into well-defined units/areas
of content along with a topic-wise breakdown. The Units shall be
numbered.

(2) The question papers for the end term examinations shall be set in such a
manner as to ensure that they cover the entire syllabus of the concerned
course unit.

(3) The tests and examinations shall aim at evaluating not only the student‘s
ability to recall information, which he had memorized, but also his
understanding of the subject and ability to synthesize scattered bits of
information into a meaningful whole. Some of the questions shall be
analytical and invite original thinking or application of theory.

(4) The Examiners shall be free to repeat questions set in previous

examinations. This is necessary in order to ensure that students do not leave
out important portions of the syllabus. Suitable instructions should be given
to paper setters in this regard.

29
 (5) The paper setters should give wider choice to the students for answering
questions, by providing alternate questions in each of the syllabus. The
total option in a question paper should not be more than 30% of the total
marks assigned to a question paper.

22. SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATIONS

(1) For the final year students, special supplementary examinations for those
who have not secured passing grades, or were debarred/detained from
appearing in any examination and they made up the deficiency in attendance
as per provisions of these Regulations, will normally be held within sixty
days after the declaration of results of the final Semester Examinations. For
this purpose, the students of one year courses shall be deemed as final year
students.

(2) A student who fails to appear or qualify in Supplementary Examinations,

shall reappear in the examinations when scheduled for the next batch of
students within the time span prescribed for the programme.

(3) A student wishing to appear/reappear in the Supplementary Examination

shall apply to the Head of Department/Constituent Units on the prescribed
form within fifteen days of the date of declaration of result enclosing
therewith the prescribed Examination Fee.

(4) The eligibility of a student for appearing in the Supplementary examination

shall be verified by the Head of Department/Constituent Unit and a list of
eligible students containing the details of Course Units in which the students
are recommended for appearing in the supplementary examination shall be
forwarded to the Controller of Examinations within one week along with
prescribed fee, after the last date for submission of examination forms.

(5) The marks obtained in repeat course unit(s) in Supplementary Examination

shall be taken into consideration for calculating the SGPA and CGPA and
eligibility for award of a degree/diploma.

23. CONDUCT OF EXAMINATIONS:

(1) The examinations shall be held for all such academic programmes as are
approved by the Academic Council and as it may notify from time to time
for awarding degree, diploma, certificates, as per the prescribed Schemes of
Teaching & Examinations and Syllabi as approved by the Academic Council

(2) Examinations shall be open to regular students i.e. candidates who have
undergone a course of study in the Institutes and those registered under
distance learning mode for a specified period of that programme of study in

30
 the Scheme of Teaching & Examination and Syllabi.

Provided that the Academic Council may allow any other category of
candidates to take the University Examination for any specified academic
programme subject to the fulfillment of such conditions as may be laid
down by the Academic Council from time to time.

(3) The last date for receipt of examination forms and fees shall be notified by
the Controller of Examinations. The schedule of end term examinations
including practicals will be notified by him through the
Departments/Constituent Units.

(4) A student may not be admitted into the examination hall, if he fails to
present to the Examination Centre Superintendent/Invigilator of the
examination his admit card or fails to satisfy the officer that it will be
produced within a reasonable time.

(5) The Centre Superintendent shall have the power to call upon any student
appearing at an examination to give a specimen signature for purpose of
identification.

(6) Permission to appear/ re-appear at a University examination may be

withdrawn before or during the course of the examination which, in the
opinion of the Vice Chancellor, justifies the student‘s expulsion..

(7) Notwithstanding anything contrary to these Regulations, no student who is

undergoing any restriction at the time of submitting the application form or
during the period of examination or who was expelled during the academic
year just preceding the date of examination at which he intends to appear
shall be admitted to the examination.

(8) Detailed Guidelines relating to the conduct of examinations such as dates

for submission of examination forms, issue of examination admit cards,
issue of duplicate certificates, instructions to examiners, examination centre
superintendents, invigilators, other members of staff engaged in examination
duty shall be approved by the Vice Chancellor. The Examination Centres
shall be advised through Guidelines to take all steps for proper conduct of
examinations such as proper supervision and invigilation, effective security
cordoning off the examination centres from the range of loudspeakers and
other interference and taking stern action in all cases involving copying and
use of unfair means misbehaviour or misconduct of students during
examinations.

24 APPOINTMENT OF AMANUENSIS FOR WRITING EXAMINATION

(1) Amanuensis shall be provided on request made by the student to the Head
of Department/Constituent Unit on the recommendations of Examination
Sub-Committee well in advance duly supported with a Medical Certificate
from authorized Medical Officer under the following cases:
31
 (a) candidates having impairment of movement in arms and hands, can read
independently but have problem in writing .
(b) locomotors impaired and cerebral palsy students
(c) sudden illness rendering the candidate unable to write.
(d) an accident involving injury rendering the candidate unable to write

(2) The amanuensis must be a student of atleast one lower grade of education
than that of the candidate.

(3) The Examination Sub- Committee shall select suitable amanuensis from an
institution as far as possible and forward to the Controller of Examinations,
the details of the person appointed as amanuensis and of the candidate for
whom amanuensis has been appointed.

(4) A separate room for such disabled candidate and one separate Invigilator to
supervise his examination shall be provided.

(5) The amanuensis shall be paid an honorarium as prescribed by the University

from time to time.

(6) No extra fee shall be charged from the student for providing the facility of
amanuensis.

(7) For a written examination of duration of one hour, twenty minutes extra
time shall be provided. Similarly, for written examination involving more
than one or less than one hour extra time shall be worked out on the basis of
twenty minutes per one hour criteria.

25 DISCIPLINARY CONTROL OF STUDENTS IN RELATION TO

UNIVERSITY EXAMINATIONS
(1) During examinations, the candidates shall be under the disciplinary control
of the Examination Centre Superintendent who will issue necessary
instructions. If a candidate disobeys instructions or misbehaves with any
member of the supervisory staff or University Observer or representative or
the invigilators at the Centre, he may be expelled from the examination for
that session. The Examination Centre Superintendent shall immediately
report the facts of such a case with full details of evidence to the Controller
of Examinations who will refer the matter to the Examination Discipline
Committee. The said Committee will make recommendations for
disciplinary action as it may deem fit, to the Vice Chancellor.

(2) The students shall maintain proper discipline and orderly conduct during the
examinations. They shall not make use of any unfair or dishonest means or
indulge in disorderly conduct in the examinations.

(3) ACTS OF DISORDERLY CONDUCT IN THE EXAMINATION:

Acts of disorderly conduct in the examination, a practical or oral

examination include:
32
 (a) Misbehaviour in the examination hall with the Centre
Superintendent, the Invigilator on duty, the Examiner conducting a
practical or oral examination or the members of flying squads, the
observers, the representatives of the University or the other staff
working at the Examination Centre, or with any other Candidate, in
or around the examination centre, or threat to life of these
examination staff, observers, members of flying squads etc. before,
during or after the examination hour.

(b) Intentionally tearing off the answer book(s) or a part thereof or a

continuation sheet or any other specific response sheet used in the
examination;

(c ) Causing damage to laboratory equipments, books in library and other

properties.

(d) Disturbing or disrupting or instigating others to disturb/disrupt the

examination.

(e) Instigating others to leave the examination room.

(f) Carrying any weapons into the examination centre.

(g) Non-surrender of previous Grade sheets as required under Para 30(5)

(h). Any act not specified above as determined by the Academic

Council.

(4) ACTS OF UNFAIR MEANS

The following shall be deemed to be the act of unfair means:

(a) Talking to another candidate or any person, inside or outside the

examination hall, during the examination without the permission of a
member of the supervisory staff;

(b) Leaving the examination hall without handing over the answer book
and or continuation sheet, if any, or any other specifically designed
response sheet to the Invigilator or Supervisor concerned or Centre
Superintendent or the concerned authorized officer of the University
deputed to the examination centre, and taking away, tearing off or
otherwise disposing off the same or any part thereof;

(c) Writing matter connected with or relating to a question or solving a

question on any thing (such as piece of paper or cloth, scribbling pad),
other than the answer book, the continuation sheet, any other
response sheet specifically provided by the University to the
candidate.
33
(d) Writing or sketching abusive or obscene expressions on the answer
book or the continuation sheet or any other response sheet.

(e) Deliberately disclosing one‘s identity or making any distinctive

marks in the answer book for that purpose.

(f) Making appeal to the Examiner/Evaluator soliciting favour through

the answer book or through any other mode.

(g) Possession by a Candidate or having access to books, notes, paper or

any other material, whether written, inscribed or engraved, or any
other device, which could be of help or assistance to him in answering
any part of the question paper.

(h) Concealing, destroying, disfiguring, swallowing, running away with,

causing disappearance of or attempting to do any of these things in
respect of any book, notes, paper or other material or device, used or
attempted to be used by a student for assistance or help in answering a
question or a part thereof.

(i) Passing on or attempting to pass on, during the examination hours, a

copy of a question, or a part thereof, or solution to a question paper or
a part thereof, to any other Candidate or to any person;

(j) Smuggling into the examination hall and or receiving/attempting to

receive an answer book or a continuation sheet, or any other form of
response sheet or a solution to a question paper or to a part thereof or
taking out or arranging to send an answer book or continuation sheet,
or replacing or attempting to get replaced the answer book or
continuation sheet or any other response sheet during or after the
examination with or without the help of or in connivance with any
person connected with the examination, or through any other agency,
whatsoever.

(k) Approaching or influencing directly or indirectly a paper setter,

examiner, evaluator, moderator, tabulator or printer or any other
person connected with the University examination with the object,
directly or indirectly, of influencing him to leak out the question paper
or any part thereof, or stealing/procuring the question paper from any
source before the examination or to enhance marks, or favourably
evaluate, or to change the award in favour of the candidate.

(l) Any attempt by a candidate or by any person on his behalf to

influence, or interfere with, directly or indirectly, the discharge of the
duties of a member of the supervisory or inspecting staff of an
examination centre before, during or after the examination. Provided
that without prejudice to the generality of the provision of the clause,
this would include any such person who;
34
 (i) abuses, insults, intimidates, assaults any member of the
supervisory or inspecting staff, or threatens to do so;

(ii) abuses, insults, intimidates, assaults any other candidate or

threatens to do so, shall be deemed to have interfered with or
influenced the discharge of the duties of the Supervisory and
the inspecting staff within the meaning of this para.

(m) Copying, attempting to copy, taking assistance or help from any book,
notes, paper or any other material or device or from any other
candidate, to do any of these things or facilitating or rendering any
assistance to any other candidate to do any of these things;

(n) Arranging to impersonate for any person, whosoever he may be, or for
himself or impersonating for other candidate at the examination.

(o) Forging a document or using a forged document knowing it to be

forged in any manner relating to the examination.

(p) Any other act of omission or commission declared by the Academic

Council/Executive Council to be unfair means in respect of any or all
the examinations.

(5) REPORTING OF CASES OF UNFAIR MEANS, MISBEHAVIOUR,

MISCONDUCT OR DISORDERLY CONDUCT OF EXAMINATIONS:

(a) A candidate who is suspected to have used unfair means or

misbehaved or commits any of the acts mentioned in Paras 25(3) &
25(4) above during the course of the examinations is expected to
give a statement about the facts of the incident. He shall, however,
not be forced to give a statement, but the fact of his having refused
to make a statement shall be recorded by the Invigilator and the
Centre Superintendent which shall be witnessed in writing by two
other members of the supervisory staff on duty at the time of
occurrence of the incident

(b) A candidate detected or suspected of using unfair means in the

examination may be permitted to answer the question paper, on a
separate answer book in the remaining duration of the examination..
The answer book in which the use of unfair means is suspected shall
be seized by the Invigilator or Centre Superintendent, who shall send
both the answer books to the Controller of Examinations with his
report. This will not affect the concerned candidate appearing in the
rest of the examinations

(c) All the cases relating to disorderly conduct of examinations,

misbehaviour/ misconduct of students and their use of unfair means
in the examinations and mass copying shall be reported by the
35
 concerned invigilator through the Centre Superintendent/
Examination Sub-Committee or by the examiner, paper-setter,
evaluator, moderator, tabulator or the person connected with the
University examinations as the case may be, with all the relevant
material. The Controller of Examinations shall place before the
Examination Discipline Committee all those cases for consideration
and decision in each individual case. The Committee shall
recommend penalties, if any.

(6) DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS:

(a) The Controller of Examinations or any person authorized by him in

this behalf shall communicate to the candidate, in respect of whom a
report has been received pursuant to Para 25(5), the precise nature of
allegations against him and shall require him to furnish his written
explanation within a stipulated period under intimation to the Head
of Department/Constituent Unit.

(b) On receipt of the explanation from the candidate through the Head of
Department/ Constituent Unit or on the expiry of the period
stipulated for submitting explanation, if no explanation is received
from the candidate, the Controller of Examinations shall submit the
case before the Examination Discipline Committee for consideration
and make recommendations to the Vice Chancellor.

(c) After considering all the material on record including the

explanation, if any, submitted by the candidate, the Examination
Discipline Committee, if satisfied that the candidate is guilty of the
use of dishonest or unfair means or disorderly conduct in the
examination, will take a decision in each case and recommend to the
Vice Chancellor the punishment that may be imposed on the
candidate according to the nature of the offence.

(d) Ordinarily, all decisions shall be taken by the Examination

Discipline Committee by simple majority. If the members are
equally divided, the case shall be referred to the Vice Chancellor,
whose decision shall be final

(e) All decisions of the Examination Discipline Committee as approved

by the Vice Chancellor shall be communicated to the student through
the Head of Department/Constituent Unit by the Controller of
Examinations.

(f) Notwithstanding anything contained expressly or impliedly in these

Regulations, the Vice Chancellor may, on being satisfied after such
enquiry as he may deem fit for the following contingencies,
withdraw retrospectively, prior to the publication of the final results
of a student in a course, the permission granted to such candidate to

36
 pursue that course or to appear at a University examination in
relation thereto:

(i) the student was ineligible for admission to the course but was
wrongly admitted, or

(ii) the student was ineligible to take the examination on account of

shortage of attendance but was permitted to do so by some
mistake or some other unavoidable reason, or

(iii) a discrepancy was found in the attendance record on account

of which the candidate who had taken the examination was in
fact ineligible, or

(iv) a discrepancy was discovered in the award of marks etc. which

rendered that result of the student liable to be cancelled to his
disadvantage.

Provided, that no such action shall be taken by the Vice Chancellor

without giving an opportunity to the concerned student to show
cause against the proposed action and provided further that such
action shall require the confirmation of the Academic Council.

(g) If a student is found guilty of having impersonated for any candidate

not otherwise covered by these provisions or of having got the
answer book written by any one outside the examination hall and his
answer book is smuggled into the examination hall for his benefit, or
of having managed otherwise to replace the answer book or its any
page of the candidate after the examination, disciplinary proceedings
shall be instituted against the student and the candidate in the
manner prescribed.

(7) MASS SCALE COPYING OR USE OF UNFAIR MEANS

(a) If the Invigilator incharge is satisfied that 33-1/3% or more students

were involved in using unfair means or copying in a particular
examination/hall, it shall be deemed to be a case of mass copying.
A report to this effect shall be sent to the Controller of Examinations
by the Superintendent of the examination centre without any delay
and on the day of the occurrence, if possible, each case where use of
unfair means in the examination is suspected or discovered with full
details of the evidence in support thereof and the statement of the
candidate(s) concerned, if any, on the prescribed form supplied by
the University for the purpose;

(b). Where the Evaluator/Examiner is satisfied that 33-1/3% of the

answer books evaluated by him have identical response in a
particular Examination, it shall be deemed to be a case of mass
copying and a detailed report to this effect with documentary
37
 evidence shall be prepared by the concerned Evaluator/Examiner
and sent to the Controller of Examinations separately in sealed
cover. The answer books of copying cases shall be separately sealed
before transmission to the Controller of Examinations;

(c) If the Vice Chancellor is satisfied that there has been a mass-scale
copying or use of unfair means at a particular centre(s), he may
cancel the examination of all the candidates concerned and order re-
examination.

(8) PENALTIES

(A) The Examination Discipline Committee may recommend penalties as

under:

S.No. Sub-para of Penalties to be recommended by Examination

Regulation Discipline Committee
25(3) & 25(4)
for Acts of
Students
1 25(3) The entire examinations of the Candidate in respect of
which he is found to have committed an act of disorder
during conduct of examinations be cancelled.
2 25(4)(a) & (b) The examination for the session or course unit in
respect of which a candidate is found to have used
unfairmeans be cancelled.
3 25(4)(c),(d),(e) The examination for the session or course unit or the
&(f) entire examination of a candidate in respect of which
he is found to have used unfairmeans be cancelled
4 25(4)(g), (h), The entire examination of the candidate in respect of
(i), (j), (k), (l), which he is found to have used unfairmeans be
(m), (n), (o), cancelled and he shall further be disqualified from
&(p) appearing at any University examination for a period to
be specified by the Committee.

(B) A candidate against whom an enquiry is pending about his allegedly

having resorted to the use of dishonest or unfair means, or disorderly
conduct in the examination or against whom action is initiated under the
provisions of the preceding clause shall, if he takes or has taken any
subsequent examination, be deemed to have been only provisionally
admitted to that subsequent examination. That subsequent examination will
stand cancelled and his result thereof shall not be declared if on account of
the punishment imposed on him as a result of the said enquiry or action, he
would not have been entitled to take that examination but for his provisional
admission thereto.

(9) APPEALS AND REVIEW

38
 (a) A student on whom any punishment has been imposed may, within 30 days
from the date of the receipt of the communication in that behalf, make a
representation to the Vice Chancellor for review of his case. The Vice
Chancellor, if he deems it necessary, refer it back to Examination Discipline
Committee for review. The recommendations of the Examination Discipline
Committee on the Appeal shall be placed before the Vice Chancellor who
will thereupon review the case and pass such orders as he may consider fit
or refer it to the Academic Council for advice.

(b) In the case of a candidate who has been expelled from the University in
terms of provisions of these Regulations, the Academic Council on the
recommendation of the Vice Chancellor, on the expiry of three years or such
period as specified after such expulsion exempt a candidate from further
operation of the punishment awarded.

(c) If within four months of the publication of the results, it is brought to the
notice of the Controller of Examinations that a candidate was guilty of the
use of dishonest or unfair means at the examination in respect of which his
result was declared, the provisions of these regulations shall apply mutatis
mutandis to the case of such a candidate provided that before imposing any
penalty including the penalty of cancellation of his result, he shall be given
another opportunity to show cause against the proposed punishment and his
explanation, if any, shall be considered by the Academic Council.

26. INSPECTION OF EXAMINATION CENTRE

(1) Every examination centre shall be open to inspection by the Chancellor,

Vice Chancellor, Pro-Vice Chancellor or Controller of Examinations and
such other officers so authorised by the Vice Chancellor or Controller of
Examinations in this behalf.

(2) There shall be the Observers/Flying Squads who shall be required to visit
centres allotted to them during the course of examination and check that the
examinations are being conducted properly according to the Regulations.
Every Observer/member of Flying Squad shall submit his inspection report
on the same day to the Controller of Examinations by name.

27. RE-EXAMINATION/QUASHING/REVISION OF RESULTS

(1) If the Vice Chancellor is satisfied that a situation did arise or has arisen
which calls for re-examination in particular course units, he may issue
necessary directions to that effect.

(2) Notwithstanding any thing contrary to these Regulations, the Vice

Chancellor shall have the powers to:

(a) order for holding a special examination for any reason;

(b) cancel the paper/entire examination(s) held at a particular
examination centre/all examination centres, if he is satisfied that the
39
 examination has not been held under proper conditions and make
necessary arrangements of affected candidates in the same year or
when it deems fit.

(3) The Vice Chancellor shall have the powers to quash the result of a candidate
wholly or partially after it has been declared, if :

(a) any error (such as error in recording of score in result, ineligibility

of student for admission due to falsification of documents etc) or
mistake is found in his result;
(b) it is found that he was not eligible to appear in the examination;
(c) there is any other reason which may be determined by the Vice
Chancellor.

(4) If in quashing the result, a candidate is declared as failed who was

previously declared to have passed in an examination, the University may,
after considering the circumstances of the case give to the candidate the
benefit of any privilege which he may have acquired by studying in the next
higher class in a Department/Constituent Unit or taking an examination
conducted by the University.

(5) The University shall have the powers to revise the result of the candidate(s)
in a particular subject(s), if it is satisfied that a malafide has been shown by
the examiner or any other concerned person. In such a case the revision will
be made on the recommendations of the examiner/examiners appointed by
the Vice Chancellor for this purpose.

28. LOSS OF ANSWER BOOK(S)

(1) If any answer book of student(s) is lost at the Examination Centre after
having been received by the Centre Superintendent of the examination or by
any of the invigilators or during transmission to concerned person and if he
passes in all other subjects of the examination, he may be required to re-
appear in that particular paper in which the answer book was lost, on a date
fixed by the Vice Chancellor and if he obtains pass marks, he shall be
deemed to have passed the examination.

(2) If an answer book of a student received by the Controller of Examinations

or the Officer authorised in this behalf or by an examiner is lost, the Vice
Chancellor shall have the power to decide:

(a) whether the student be given in missing paper, the average of marks
earned by him in other papers as per formula given in para 28(3);
(b) whether the student be required to appear again in that paper on a
date to be fixed by the Vice Chancellor.

(3) The following formula shall be applicable for determining the average of
missing paper(s)

40
 (a) Compulsory paper(s): Average of other Compulsory Papers
(b ) Elective Paper(s): Average of other Elective Papers
(c) Practical Paper(s): Average of other Practical Papers

(4) In case of loss of Project Report/Summer Placement Report/ Dissertation of

a student, the student will be required to submit duplicate copy thereof

(5) In case of a dispute whether answer book(s) of students was/were duly

received or not, the decision of the Vice Chancellor shall be final.

29. ISSUE OF GRADE SHEETS

(1) In the Grade Sheets, the marks of internal continuous evaluation and end
term examination shall be shown separately. The total marks obtained in
internal continuous evaluation and end term examination of a course unit
shall be converted into letter grades as per Para 14(3). The letter Grade so
assessed shall also be shown along with its equivalent grade point in the
Grade Sheets. An over-all AGPA/SGPA/TGPA and CGPA shall also be
shown.

(2) Duplicate grade sheet shall be issued against payment of fee as may be
prescribed.

30. RECHECKING/RE-EVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOKS/PROJECT

REPORTS AND EXAMINATION RESULTS

(1) The answer book of a student in any examination shall not be reassessed
under any circumstances. However, after the publication of the results of
the University examinations, if a candidate, whether passed or failed, has
strong grounds and belief that some mistake has been made in connection
with his results, he may apply to the Controller of Examinations through
HOD on prescribed application form along with attested copy of his Grade
sheet for re-checking of his answer book in one or more papers as the case
may be on payment of prescribed fee within two weeks of the date of
declaration of results.

(2) The Controller of Examinations may accept the application for rechecking
of answer books upto 15 days from the expiry of the date in exceptional
cases.

(3) Whereas, the re-checking does not mean reassessment or re-evaluation of

the answer book, the Controller of Examination may appoint any Officer to
see that:

(a) There is no mistake in the grand total on the title page of the answer
book
(b) The total of various parts of a question has been correctly made at
the end of each question;

41
 (c) All totals have been correctly brought forward on the title page of
the answer book;
(d) No portion of any answer has been left un-evaluated;
(e) Total marks in the answer book tally with the marks sheet;
(f) The answer book or any part thereof has not been changed/detached;
(g) The handwriting of the candidate supplementary answer sheet tally
with the main answer book

(4) In the event of detection of any omission or mistake in the script or in the
compilation of the result of a student, the matter shall be reported to the
Controller of Examinations who will get the omission rectified by referring
the answer book to the concerned examiner. .

(5) If the re-checking revealed, subject to the provisions made under Para 30 (4)
above, any discrepancy by virtue of which the marks of the student are
revised, the record shall be corrected accordingly and revised grade sheet
shall be issued after the previous grade sheet is surrendered.

(6) If any such student refuses to surrender his previous grade sheet required
under Para 30 (5) above shall be treated to have misbehaved and shall be
dealt with by the Examination Discipline Committee under the relevant
provisions of these Regulations.

(7) The Vice Chancellor shall also have the powers to effect the recovery of the
Grade Sheet by force through any of the law enforcing agencies.

31. REFUND OF EXAMINATION FEE

(1) Examination fee, if any, once paid shall not be refunded or transferred to a
Subsequent examination even if the candidate fails to present himself for the
examination, except in the following cases:

(a) If the name of the candidate has been submitted by the Head of
department/Constituent Unit but later on his attendance is found to
be short of the required percentage and his name has been withdrawn
at least 10 days before the commencement of examination, 90% of
the fee so deposited will be refunded.

(b) If a student is declared pass in the subject(s) and on rechecking

resulted into correction in result (even enrolment is allotted), 90% of
the fee deposited meant for examination shall be refunded.

(c) If the student expires before appearing in the examination, 100% of

the fee shall be refunded to the legal heirs.

(2) The claim for refund of any fee, if admissible under these regulations, must
be made within one year after the fee is deposited. No claim shall be
entertained thereafter.

42
32. REMUNERATION TO THE EXAMINERS, MODERATORS,
INVIGILATORS, TABULATORS AND OTHER STAFF ENGAGED ON
EXAMINATION DUTY

The examiners, evaluators, moderators, external experts invited for Examination

work, Centre Superintendent, Invigilators, Observers, members of flying squads,
examination staff shall be paid remuneration as recommended by the Finance
Committee and approved by the Academic Council/ Executive Council from time
to time.

33. AWARD OF DEGREES, DIPLOMAS, CERTIFICATES AND OTHER

ACADEMIC DISTINCTIONS

(1) The text and the format of the degrees and diploma documents, certificates,
citations and other documents of academic distinctions shall be as approved
by the Academic Council. The nomenclature of Degree, Diploma, and
Certificate etc. shall be same as specified by the UGC, AICTE, NCTE,
MCI, Pharmacy Council of India and such other Statutory Bodies.

(2) The degrees, diplomas, certificates, citations and other documents relating to
other academic distinctions shall be signed by the Registrar and
countersigned by the Vice Chancellor. Provisional Certificates shall be
signed by the Controller of Examinations.

(3) A student shall be awarded a degree/diploma, if:

(a) He has registered himself, undergone the course of studies,

completed the project report/dissertation / training report as specified
in the curriculum of his programme within the stipulated time, and
secured the minimum Grades prescribed for award of the concerned
degree/diploma/certificate;

(b) There are no dues outstanding in his/her name to the

University/Department/Constituent Unit; and

(c) No disciplinary action is pending against him.

(4) The Registrar shall place the particulars of all the successful and eligible
students for the award of certificate, diploma, or degree before the
Academic Council after declaration of results.

(5) Approval accorded by the Academic Council for award of the respective
degrees, diplomas, certificates etc. shall be placed before the Executive
Council for its concurrence. On being concurred by the Executive Council,
the degree shall be awarded to the successful candidates at convocation

(6) In extreme emergency, the degrees, diplomas, certificates shall be awarded

to the successful students before the Convocation with the approval of Vice
Chancellor and the matter be reported to the Academic Council.
43
34. WITHHOLDING CONFERMENT OF ANY DEGREE/DIPLOMA OR
AWARD OF ANY CERTIFICATE

Notwithstanding anything contained in these regulations or in any other Statute,

Ordinance or regulations, the Academic Council may, on the recommendations of
the Vice – Chancellor, withhold for such period as they may deem fit, conferment
of any Degree/Diploma or Award of any certificate to any successful candidate at
an examination of the University, for reasons, which, in their opinion, justify such
withholding e.g. unruly or disorderly conduct, or violence on the campus or in a
Constituent Unit or conviction for an offence involving violence or moral turpitude.

35. WITHDRAWAL OF DEGREES, DIPLOMAS AND OTHER ACADEMIC

DISTINCTIONS
(1) If any student has secured admission by falsification of documents or
concealment of material facts or conviction for an offence involving
violence and moral turpitude, or for such other serious offence, the
degree/diploma/certificate/other academic distinction awarded to him shall
be withdrawn by the University with the approval of the Executive Council.

(2) In order to take action the withdrawal of any

degree/diploma/certificate/other academic distinction conferred or granted

by the University, the Registrar shall frame charges against the person
concerned which shall be approved by the Vice Chancellor. The charge
sheet along with the list of witnesses and documents on the basis of which
the charges are relied upon shall be communicated by him by registered post
or by hand. The person concerned shall be required to submit his
explanation of the charges within a period of fifteen days or such time as
may be granted in the notice of the receipt of charges.

(3) If the concerned person fails to submit his reply within the stipulated time,
the matter shall be placed before the Vice Chancellor for a decision on the
basis of facts and documents on record. If the concerned person submits his
reply to the charges, the same shall be considered by the Executive Council.

(4) Every proposal for the withdrawal of an honorary degree shall require prior
approval of the Chancellor.

36. OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPTS TO STUDENTS

The University will issue Official Transcript to a student for seeking admission to
pursue higher studies in foreign universities/institutions per the guidelines.

44
37. RESIDUAL PROVISIONS

(1) The Academic Council may, in exceptional cases, grant exemption from the
operation of any of the Regulations governing migration, the courses to be
pursued by the students, attendance at lectures or sessional or other work or
the examination of candidates and authorize what is proper to be done
instead in such cases, provided that no such exemption and authority shall
be deemed to have been granted unless not less than two-thirds of the
members of the Academic Council present voted in favour of the motion
for such exemption and authority made by, or with the written authority of
the Vice Chancellor;

(2) Notwithstanding anything stated in these Regulations, for any unforeseen

issues arising, or not covered by these Regulations or in the event of
differences of interpretation, the Vice-Chancellor may take a decision, with
the approval of the Founder President of the Foundation.

______________________

45