SECOND TERM EXAMINATION IN SED 3203-ASSESSMENT IN LEARNING 2
Writing Performance Task Design: PROCESS ORIENTED
Grade Level: 7
Quarter: Fourth Quarter
Content Standard: Employ a variety of strategies for effective interpersonal communication
(Interview, Dialogue, Conversation)
Code: EN7OL-I-b1.14
Lesson: Strategies for Effective Interpersonal Communication (Conversation, Dialogue,
Interview)
Type of Task: Process Oriented
Name of Task: Oral Interview: A Group Activity
I. Objectives: To conduct an oral interview employing the strategies used for an
effective interpersonal communication.
II. Title: Oral Interview
III. Description of the Expected Output:
• Choose a topic for which the students aim to conduct an interview.
• Formulate five (5) questions to be used in the interview. Make sure that the
questions are elaborative, descriptive, and relevant to the selected topic.
• There should be five (5) respondents or interviewees.
• The interview, which can take place in person or online, will be videotaped.
A transcription of the interview is also required from the students.
• Employ the following interview strategies to ensure its effectiveness and
also for the benefit of both the interviewer and respondent.
• The students will be grouped into five (5).
IV. Learning Competencies
a. To understand the different strategies and techniques used to conduct an
effective interview.
b. Employ the strategies and techniques for an effective interview in your own
interview.
c. To write effective interview questions.
d. To interview someone orally in order to practice interpersonal
communication.
V. Assessment Plan
Points Allotted: The task will have a total of 100 points.
Assessment tool: An Analytic Rubric using a 4-point scale will be used to
evaluate the task, and the criteria include the following:
a. Structure of Interview 20%
b. Delivery 25%
c. Engagement 20%
d. Quality of Questions 25%
e. Completeness of the Interview 10%
The scores will be transmuted using the scale:
5.00 100 3.25 – 3.49 65
4.75 – 4.99 95 3.00 – 3.24 60
4.50 – 4.74 90 2.75 – 2.99 55
4.25 – 4.49 85 2.50 – 2.74 50
4.00 – 4.24 80 2.25 – 2.49 45
3.75 – 3.99 75 2.00 – 2.24 40
3.50 – 3.74 70 1.00 – 1.99 39
Oral Interview: ANALYTIC RUBRIC
Criteria 4 3 2 1 % TOTAL
Excellent Good Fair Needs
Improvement
Structure of The interview is The interview is The interview is The interview is 20%
Interview well-structured somewhat well- poorly structured not well-
and organized in structured and and arranged in structured and
a logical organized in a a logical manner, organized.
manner. The logical manner. lacking some
interviewer crucial parts of
starts with an an interview.
introduction,
formal inquiry
with regards the
respondents’
personal
information then
proceeds to the
main questions.
The interview is
also carefully
wrapped up.
Delivery The interviewer The interviewer The interviewer The interviewer 25%
delivers the is adequately lacks is not confident,
questions with confident, confidence, struggles to
confidence, communicates communicates communicate
communicates clearly and poorly and properly and
clearly and demonstrates seldom demonstrate
demonstrates active listening. demonstrates active listening.
active listening. active listening.
Maintains Does not
Maintains eye minimal eye Barely maintains maintain eye
contact with the contact and eye contact and contact, always
respondent, looks at their constantly look looking at their
barely looking at notes in few at their notes. notes.
their notes. instances.
Lacks vocal The interviewer
Speaks with Somewhat clarity and demonstrates
vocal clarity and speaks with proper inarticulacy; no
modulation. vocal clarity and modulations. vocal clarity and
modulations. proper
Pronunciations Majority of modulations.
are all correct. Almost all pronunciations
pronunciations are incorrect. All
are correct. pronunciations
are incorrect.
Engagement The interviewer The interviewer The interviewer The interviewer 20%
effectively engages with lacks does not engage
engages with the respondent, engagement with the
the respondent, occasionally with the respondent,
giving them giving them respondent. struggles to
empathetic empathetic Environment provide
responses and responses and also lacks empathetic
also maintain a tries to maintain conduciveness. responses and
conducive conducive maintaining
environment. environment. conducive
environment.
Quality of The formulated The formulated The formulated The formulated 25%
Questions questions are questions are questions are questions are
well- somewhat well- well-researched not well-
researched, researched, but lacks researched and
elaborative, elaborative, relevance in the is not relevant to
descriptive and descriptive, and chosen topic. the topic
is relevant to the relevant to the chosen.
chosen topic. chosen topic.
Completeness The interview is The interview is The interview is The interview 10%
of the Interview complete with almost incomplete with only has two (2)
five (5) complete with only three (3) respondents
respondents four (4) respondents and and questions.
and questions. respondents questions. Transcriptions is
Transcriptions is and questions. Transcriptions is not provided.
also provided. Transcriptions is provided.
also provided.
Scoring Guide:
4 = 20 points 3 = 15 points 2 = 10 points 1 = 5 points
Oral Interview: HOLISTIC RUBRIC
Score Descriptions
Level 4 (Excellent) The work reflects all of the following:
20 pts • The interview is logically arranged and well-structured, with an
introduction, a probe into the key questions, and a conclusion.
• The interviewer/s exhibits good verbal and non-verbal
communication skills:
Speaks with confidence and clarity.
Demonstrates active listening.
Speaks with vocal clarity and modulation.
Maintains eye contact with the respondents, barely looking at their
notes.
All words are pronounced correctly.
• The interviewer effectively engages with the respondent, giving
them empathetic responses and also maintain a conducive
environment.
• The questions are descriptive, elaborative, well-researched, and
pertinent to the subject matter.
• The interview exhibits completeness, containing five questions,
respondents, and transcriptions.
Level 3 (Good) The work reflects most or many of the following:
15pts • The interview is logically arranged and well-structured, with an
introduction, a probe into the key questions, and a conclusion.
• The interviewer/s fairly exhibits good verbal and non-verbal
communication skills:
Speaks with confidence and clarity.
Demonstrates active listening.
Speaks with vocal clarity and modulation.
Maintains eye contact with the respondents, barely looking at their
notes.
All words are pronounced correctly.
• The interviewer effectively engages with the respondent, giving
them empathetic responses and also maintain a conducive
environment.
• The questions are descriptive, elaborative, well-researched, and
pertinent to the subject matter.
• The interview exhibits completeness, containing five questions,
respondents, and transcriptions.
Level 2 (Fair) The work reflects only two (2) of the following:
10 pts • The interview is logically arranged and well-structured, with an
introduction, a probe into the key questions, and a conclusion.
• The interviewer/s exhibits good verbal and non-verbal
communication skills:
Speaks with confidence and clarity.
Demonstrates active listening.
Speaks with vocal clarity and modulation.
Maintains eye contact with the respondents, barely looking at their
notes.
All words are pronounced correctly.
• The interviewer effectively engages with the respondent, giving
them empathetic responses and also maintain a conducive
environment.
• The questions are descriptive, elaborative, well-researched, and
pertinent to the subject matter.
• The interview exhibits completeness, containing five questions,
respondents, and transcriptions.
Level 1 The work reflects only one (1) of the following:
(Needs • The interview is logically arranged and well-structured, with an
Improvement) introduction, a probe into the key questions, and a conclusion.
5 pts • The interviewer/s exhibits good verbal and non-verbal
communication skills:
Speaks with confidence and clarity.
Demonstrates active listening.
Speaks with vocal clarity and modulation.
Maintains eye contact with the respondents, barely looking at their
notes.
All words are pronounced correctly.
• The interviewer effectively engages with the respondent, giving
them empathetic responses and also maintain a conducive
environment.
• The questions are descriptive, elaborative, well-researched, and
pertinent to the subject matter.
• The interview exhibits completeness, containing five questions,
respondents, and transcriptions.