International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) E-ISSN: 2581-5946

DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p115

Volume: 6 Issue: 4 July to August 2023 https://www.ijsmsjournal.org

Unemployment and Economic Growth: An

In-depth Analysis
Dimitra Mitsi#1
#
Ministry of Finance
15 Diotimas Street, Tripolis Arcadias, Greece

Abstract - Unemployment and economic growth are two crucial factors that significantly impact a nation's
socio-economic landscape. This paper delves into the intricate relationship between unemployment and
economic growth, exploring the underlying causes, consequences, and potential policy interventions. It aims to
provide a comprehensive understanding of how unemployment influences economic growth and vice versa,
while shedding light on the measures that policymakers can undertake to foster a more resilient and prosperous
economy.

Keywords - economic growth, unemployment, Philips curve

I. INTRODUCTION

Unemployment and economic growth are pivotal aspects that deeply influence the well-being and stability of
any nation's economy. The relationship between these two variables is complex and multifaceted, with their
interplay often shaping the overall economic landscape. High unemployment rates can pose significant
challenges to a country's prosperity, social fabric, and individual livelihoods, while robust economic growth has
the potential to generate ample job opportunities and raise the living standards of the populace.

Unemployment occurs when individuals who are actively seeking employment are unable to find suitable jobs.
This phenomenon can arise from a variety of factors, such as shifts in business cycles, technological
advancements leading to skill mismatches, or frictional movements in the labor market. Understanding the
different forms of unemployment and their underlying causes is crucial for devising effective policy measures to
address this issue.

On the other hand, economic growth is the manifestation of an expanding economy over a specific period. It is
typically measured by changes in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and reflects the overall increase in the
production of goods and services within a country. A thriving economy fosters optimism and prosperity, as it
creates opportunities for investment, innovation, and increased consumer spending.

The intricate relationship between unemployment and economic growth often revolves around a delicate
balancing act. A growing economy may lead to reduced unemployment as more jobs are created, providing
individuals with opportunities for gainful employment. Conversely, high levels of unemployment can
undermine economic growth, as a significant portion of the workforce remains unproductive and unable to
contribute fully to the nation's productivity and output.

This paper aims to delve deeper into the connection between unemployment and economic growth, exploring
how fluctuations in one variable can impact the other and vice versa. It will also examine various forms of
unemployment and their implications for economic stability and social welfare. Additionally, the paper will
analyze the role of government policies, monetary measures, and fiscal interventions in mitigating
unemployment and fostering sustainable economic growth.

By shedding light on the nuances of this relationship and examining successful case studies, this paper seeks to
equip policymakers, economists, and stakeholders with valuable insights to formulate informed strategies and
policies that can lead to a more resilient and prosperous economy, benefiting the populace at large.

II. UNDERSTANDING UNEMPLOYMENT

Understanding unemployment is crucial for comprehending the dynamics of an economy and devising effective
policies to address this socio-economic challenge. Unemployment refers to the situation in which individuals of
working age, who are willing and able to work, are unable to find gainful employment despite actively seeking

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Page 120
International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) E-ISSN: 2581-5946

DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p115

Volume: 6 Issue: 4 July to August 2023 https://www.ijsmsjournal.org

it. It is a multifaceted phenomenon that can be categorized into different types based on its underlying causes.
Here are the main forms of unemployment:

a) Cyclical Unemployment: Cyclical unemployment is directly linked to the business cycle and the
overall health of the economy. During economic downturns or recessions, demand for goods and
services decreases, leading to a decline in production and layoffs by businesses. As a result, workers
are left unemployed due to the reduced demand for labor in the market. Conversely, during economic
expansions, cyclical unemployment tends to decrease as demand rises, and businesses hire more
workers to meet increasing production needs.
b) Structural Unemployment: Structural unemployment occurs when there is a mismatch between the
skills possessed by the workforce and the skills demanded by employers. This mismatch can be caused
by technological advancements, changes in consumer preferences, or shifts in the economy's industrial
composition. As industries evolve, certain jobs become obsolete, leaving workers without the necessary
skills to fit the requirements of new job opportunities. Realigning the skills of the labor force with the
demands of the job market often takes time and may require education and training programs to bridge
the gap.
c) Frictional Unemployment: Frictional unemployment results from the normal and temporary transitions
that occur in the labor market. It is the brief period of unemployment that individuals experience while
searching for new jobs or transitioning between different positions. Job seekers may take time to find
suitable employment due to factors such as location preferences, information gaps, or the time it takes
for employers to process applications and conduct interviews. Frictional unemployment is an inherent
part of a dynamic labor market and is generally considered less concerning than other forms of
unemployment.
d) Seasonal Unemployment: Seasonal unemployment is tied to certain industries or jobs that experience
fluctuations in demand based on the time of year. For example, ski resort workers may be unemployed
during the summer months when ski activities decline, but they regain employment during the winter
season. Similarly, agricultural workers may experience seasonal unemployment during off-peak
periods between planting and harvesting seasons.

Understanding the various forms of unemployment is essential for policymakers to develop targeted strategies
and policies to combat the specific factors driving unemployment in their respective economies. Addressing
unemployment requires a multi-pronged approach that may include macroeconomic policies to stimulate
economic growth, labor market reforms to enhance workforce skills, education and training programs to equip
individuals with relevant abilities, and measures to promote entrepreneurship and small business growth, all
aimed at creating a more robust and inclusive job market.

III. IMPACT OF UNEMPLOYMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH

Unemployment has a significant impact on economic growth and can influence the overall health and
performance of an economy in several ways. Understanding these effects is crucial for policymakers and
economists to devise appropriate strategies to foster sustainable economic development. Here are some of the
key impacts of unemployment on economic growth:

a) Reduced Consumer Spending: Unemployed individuals typically have lower disposable income, which
leads to decreased consumer spending. When a significant portion of the population is out of work,
there is a decline in the demand for goods and services, which, in turn, negatively affects businesses
and hampers economic growth.
b) Decreased Tax Revenues: High unemployment rates can lead to a decrease in tax revenues for the
government. Fewer people employed means lower income tax collections, reduced consumption tax
revenues, and a potential increase in government expenditure on social welfare programs, all of which
can strain public finances and hinder economic growth.
c) Increased Government Expenditure: As unemployment rises, there is an increased demand for social
welfare programs, such as unemployment benefits and other forms of support. While these programs
are essential to provide a safety net for those in need, they also increase government expenditure,
which can impact fiscal stability and economic growth.
d) Human Capital Erosion: Prolonged unemployment can lead to a loss of human capital, as individuals
may experience skill degradation or become discouraged from actively seeking employment. This

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Page 121
International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) E-ISSN: 2581-5946

DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p115

Volume: 6 Issue: 4 July to August 2023 https://www.ijsmsjournal.org

erosion of human capital can hinder productivity and innovation in the long run, impeding overall
economic growth.
e) Impact on Productivity: High levels of unemployment can create labor market slack, meaning that there
are more job seekers than available job openings. This situation can lead to reduced competition for
labor, potentially resulting in lower productivity and lower wages for those who are employed. Lower
productivity levels can limit economic growth and overall output.
f) Social Costs: Unemployment can have significant social costs, such as increased poverty, homelessness,
and social unrest. These issues can create an unstable environment, impacting investor confidence and
hindering business investment, which is crucial for economic growth.
g) Entrepreneurial Constraints: Unemployment can discourage entrepreneurship, as individuals may
prefer seeking stable employment rather than taking the risk of starting a business. Entrepreneurial
activity is a vital driver of innovation and economic growth, and reduced entrepreneurial spirit can
hinder overall economic development.
h) Potential Negative Feedback Loop: Unemployment can lead to a vicious cycle wherein reduced
consumer spending and economic contraction further contribute to job losses, exacerbating the
unemployment situation. Breaking this negative feedback loop requires targeted policy interventions
and measures to stimulate economic growth and job creation.

In summary, high unemployment rates can have far-reaching consequences for an economy, impacting
consumer spending, government finances, human capital, productivity, and social cohesion. Addressing
unemployment and promoting economic growth require a comprehensive approach that involves a combination
of monetary and fiscal policies, targeted interventions to enhance workforce skills, and measures to foster a
conducive business environment that encourages investment and job creation.

IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNEMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

The relationship between economic growth and unemployment is a fundamental aspect of macroeconomics that
plays a critical role in shaping the overall health and performance of an economy. The dynamic interplay
between these two variables has significant implications for policymakers, businesses, and individuals alike.
Understanding this relationship is essential for devising effective strategies to promote sustainable economic
development and reduce unemployment rates. Here are some key aspects of the relationship between economic
growth and unemployment:

a) Job Creation and Economic Growth: Economic growth typically leads to job creation. As the economy
expands, businesses experience increased demand for goods and services, which prompts them to hire
additional workers to meet the rising production needs. This surge in job opportunities helps to reduce
the overall unemployment rate as more individuals find employment.
b) Lagging Indicator: Unemployment is often considered a lagging indicator of economic growth. This
means that changes in unemployment tend to occur after changes in economic growth. During periods
of economic expansion, it may take time for businesses to ramp up hiring and for individuals to find
new job opportunities, resulting in a gradual decline in unemployment. Similarly, during economic
downturns, job losses may occur with a time lag, leading to a delayed increase in unemployment rates.
c) Skill Mismatch and Structural Unemployment: Even during periods of economic growth, there may be
instances of structural unemployment. This type of unemployment arises from a mismatch between the
skills demanded by employers and the skills possessed by the available workforce. Technological
advancements and shifts in industry demands can create skill gaps, making it challenging for some
individuals to secure employment even in a growing economy.
d) Quality of Economic Growth: The quality of economic growth matters for its impact on unemployment.
If economic growth is skewed towards capital-intensive industries or sectors with limited job creation
potential, it may not lead to significant reductions in unemployment or improvement in living standards.
Inclusive growth that benefits various segments of society is more likely to have a positive impact on
unemployment, fostering a more equitable distribution of opportunities.
e) Productivity and Unemployment: Improvements in labor productivity can influence the relationship
between economic growth and unemployment. Higher productivity allows businesses to produce more
output with the same or fewer resources, potentially leading to lower demand for labor. While
productivity gains are essential for overall economic efficiency, managing the potential trade-off
between increased productivity and job creation is a critical consideration for policymakers.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Page 122
International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) E-ISSN: 2581-5946

DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p115

Volume: 6 Issue: 4 July to August 2023 https://www.ijsmsjournal.org

f) Policy Interventions: Policymakers play a crucial role in influencing the relationship between economic
growth and unemployment. Appropriate monetary and fiscal policies can stimulate economic activity
and promote job creation. Additionally, targeted interventions such as education and training programs,
labor market reforms, and support for small and medium-sized enterprises can address structural
unemployment and enhance the labor market's efficiency.

In conclusion, the relationship between economic growth and unemployment is complex and multifaceted.
Economic growth can lead to job creation and reduce unemployment, but the nature and quality of growth, as
well as structural factors, can influence the extent of this impact. Policymakers need to adopt a holistic approach
that considers various economic indicators and employs a mix of policies to foster sustainable economic growth
and reduce unemployment rates for the benefit of society as a whole.

V. UNEMPLOYMENT AND INFLATION

Unemployment and inflation are two critical macroeconomic variables that are often studied together due to
their interconnectedness and impact on overall economic conditions. The relationship between unemployment
and inflation is commonly represented by the Phillips curve, which illustrates the inverse relationship between
these two variables. Let's explore the relationship between unemployment and inflation:

a) The Phillips Curve: The Phillips curve, first introduced by economist A.W. Phillips in the 1950s, shows
a historical inverse relationship between the rate of unemployment and the rate of inflation. According
to the curve, when unemployment is low, inflation tends to be high, and vice versa. This relationship is
often depicted as a downward-sloping curve on a graph.
b) Inflationary Pressures at Low Unemployment: When the economy is operating near or at full
employment, the labor market becomes tight, with a scarcity of available workers. This situation puts
upward pressure on wages as employers compete for a limited pool of skilled labor. With rising wages,
production costs increase for businesses, leading to higher prices for goods and services. This
phenomenon is known as demand-pull inflation, where excessive demand drives up prices.
c) Deflationary Pressures at High Unemployment: Conversely, during periods of high unemployment,
there is less pressure on wages and production costs. Businesses may find it easier to hire workers at
lower wage levels due to the surplus of labor. With reduced consumer demand, businesses may be
forced to lower prices to attract customers, leading to deflationary pressures.
d) The Natural Rate of Unemployment: The Phillips curve suggests that there exists a "natural" rate of
unemployment, also known as the Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment (NAIRU). This
is the level of unemployment below which inflation starts to rise. At the natural rate of unemployment,
the economy is considered to be at its potential output, and there is no cyclical unemployment.
Policymakers often aim to maintain the economy close to the natural rate of unemployment to achieve
stable inflation and sustainable economic growth.
e) Expectations and Adaptive Behavior: In the long run, the Phillips curve may not hold true due to
adaptive expectations. As people and businesses adjust their expectations based on past experiences of
inflation and unemployment, they begin to anticipate future changes. As a result, any temporary trade-
off between unemployment and inflation may disappear, and the Phillips curve may shift upward or
become less steep.
f) Supply Shocks: Supply-side factors, such as changes in oil prices, technological advancements, or
disruptions in production, can lead to temporary shifts in the Phillips curve. Supply shocks can impact
both unemployment and inflation simultaneously, making it challenging for policymakers to address
the situation with traditional monetary or fiscal policies.
g) Phillips Curve Trade-off: The Phillips curve trade-off implies that policymakers face a choice between
unemployment and inflation. If they aim to reduce unemployment below the natural rate, it may lead to
higher inflation. Conversely, to reduce inflation, policymakers may need to accept a higher level of
unemployment in the short term.

In conclusion, the relationship between unemployment and inflation is a crucial consideration for policymakers
seeking to achieve stable and sustainable economic conditions. While the Phillips curve historically depicted an
inverse relationship between these two variables, various factors, including expectations and supply shocks, can
influence their dynamics in the long run. Striking the right balance between unemployment and inflation
remains a key challenge for central banks and policymakers to ensure optimal economic outcomes.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Page 123
International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) E-ISSN: 2581-5946

DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p115

Volume: 6 Issue: 4 July to August 2023 https://www.ijsmsjournal.org

VI. POLICY INTERVENTIONS TO TACKLE UNEMPLOYMENT AND FOSTER ECONOMIC GROWTH

Addressing unemployment and fostering economic growth requires a comprehensive set of policy interventions
that tackle various aspects of the labor market and overall economic conditions. These policy measures should
be targeted, well-coordinated, and adaptable to the specific needs and challenges of each economy. Here are
some key policy interventions to tackle unemployment and foster economic growth:

a) Monetary Policy: Central banks can use monetary policy tools, such as setting interest rates and open
market operations, to influence borrowing costs and the money supply. During periods of economic
slowdown and high unemployment, central banks may adopt expansionary monetary policies by
lowering interest rates to encourage borrowing and investment. Lower interest rates can stimulate
consumer spending and business investment, leading to increased economic activity and job creation.
b) Fiscal Policy: Governments can use fiscal policy to boost aggregate demand and support economic
growth. During times of recession and high unemployment, expansionary fiscal policies can be
employed, involving increased government spending on infrastructure projects, education, healthcare,
and other public investments. Tax cuts and direct financial assistance to individuals and businesses can
also boost spending and support economic activity.
c) Labor Market Reforms: Implementing labor market reforms can enhance workforce flexibility and
improve job matching. Measures such as reducing excessive regulations and administrative burdens on
businesses, promoting wage flexibility, and encouraging the use of modern hiring platforms can
facilitate the transition of job seekers into suitable employment. These reforms can help reduce
structural unemployment and improve labor market efficiency.
d) Education and Training Programs: Investing in education and vocational training programs is essential
to equip the workforce with relevant skills and adapt to changing labor market demands. Government
and private sector collaboration on initiatives to upskill and reskill workers can enhance their
employability, reducing frictional unemployment and boosting productivity.
e) Support for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): SMEs are significant contributors to job creation
and economic growth. Governments can provide targeted support for SMEs through access to credit,
simplified regulations, and business development programs. Encouraging entrepreneurship and small
business growth can lead to increased innovation and job opportunities.
f) Infrastructure Development: Investments in infrastructure projects can create jobs in the short term
while improving the overall productivity and competitiveness of the economy in the long run. Projects
such as road and transportation networks, energy facilities, and digital infrastructure can stimulate
economic activity and generate employment.
g) Export Promotion: Promoting exports can help boost economic growth by tapping into foreign markets
and diversifying revenue streams. Governments can provide export incentives, remove trade barriers,
and offer support to industries with export potential, leading to increased production and job creation.
h) Sustainable Development Initiatives: Investing in environmentally sustainable and socially inclusive
projects can have positive impacts on both economic growth and unemployment. Renewable energy
projects, sustainable agriculture, and green technology initiatives can create employment opportunities
while contributing to environmental protection and social well-being.
i) Active Labor Market Programs: Governments can implement active labor market programs that
provide job search assistance, training, and temporary employment opportunities for the unemployed.
These programs can help individuals transition back into the workforce more effectively and reduce the
duration of unemployment spells.
j) Encouraging Research and Development (R&D): Supporting research and development activities can
foster innovation and create high-value jobs in cutting-edge industries. Governments can provide
incentives for private sector R&D investments and fund public research institutions to drive
technological advancements and economic growth.

In conclusion, addressing unemployment and fostering economic growth require a mix of monetary, fiscal, labor
market, and education-related policy interventions. By implementing a well-coordinated and targeted set of
policies, governments can create a conducive environment for job creation, skill development, and sustainable
economic development, leading to improved living standards and social well-being.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Page 124
International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) E-ISSN: 2581-5946

DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p115

Volume: 6 Issue: 4 July to August 2023 https://www.ijsmsjournal.org

VII. CASE STUDIES

To illustrate the effectiveness of policy interventions in tackling unemployment and fostering economic growth,
let's explore two case studies from different countries:

7.1 Case Study: Germany

Germany's labor market and economic performance in the early 2000s provide an interesting case study in
addressing unemployment and promoting economic growth.

In the early 2000s, Germany faced high unemployment rates and sluggish economic growth, largely due to the
structural challenges in its labor market. The country was burdened with rigid labor laws, high labor costs, and
low labor market flexibility, resulting in difficulty for employers to adjust to changing economic conditions.

The German government implemented a series of labor market reforms known as the "Hartz reforms" between
2003 and 2005. These reforms aimed to increase labor market flexibility, encourage job creation, and reduce
long-term unemployment. Key policy interventions included:

a) Introduction of "Hartz IV": This reform consolidated various social welfare benefits and simplified the
unemployment benefit system. It also required recipients to actively seek employment and accept
available job offers, promoting a stronger focus on job placement and reducing long-term
unemployment.
b) Labor Market Flexibility: The Hartz reforms encouraged greater labor market flexibility by easing
restrictions on temporary work contracts and providing incentives for part-time work.
c) Training and Skill Development: The government invested in vocational training and retraining
programs to equip the unemployed with relevant skills demanded by the labor market, enhancing their
employability.
d) Results: The Hartz reforms had a significant impact on Germany's labor market and economic
performance. The country experienced a substantial decline in unemployment rates over the following
years, and the labor market became more dynamic and responsive to changing economic conditions.
The reforms facilitated a smoother matching of job seekers with available vacancies, leading to a
reduction in structural unemployment.

The improved labor market conditions contributed to stronger economic growth as businesses found it easier to
adapt and expand their workforce. Germany's economy became more competitive and resilient, leading to
sustained economic growth in the subsequent years.

7.2 Case Study: South Korea

South Korea's transformation from an agrarian-based economy to a leading industrial powerhouse provides an
instructive case study on tackling unemployment and fostering economic growth.

Background: In the 1960s, South Korea faced high levels of unemployment and limited economic opportunities,
with much of the population employed in low-productivity agricultural activities.

Policy Interventions: To promote economic growth and reduce unemployment, the South Korean government
pursued a series of ambitious industrialization and development policies:

a) Export-Oriented Industrialization: South Korea adopted an export-oriented industrialization strategy,

focusing on developing a strong manufacturing sector for exports. The government provided various
incentives to attract foreign investment and support domestic industries.
b) Investment in Education and Human Capital: The government invested heavily in education and skill
development to equip the labor force with the necessary capabilities for industrialization and
technological advancements.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Page 125
International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) E-ISSN: 2581-5946

DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p115

Volume: 6 Issue: 4 July to August 2023 https://www.ijsmsjournal.org

c) Targeted Industrial Policies: The government identified key industries for development, such as
shipbuilding, steel, and electronics, and provided financial and regulatory support to encourage their
growth.
d) Land Reform: Land reform was implemented to redistribute land and promote small-scale farming,
increasing productivity in agriculture while freeing up labor for the growing industrial sector.
e) Results: South Korea's industrialization and development policies proved highly successful in
transforming the economy. The country experienced rapid economic growth and industrialization,
leading to a significant decline in unemployment rates. By promoting manufacturing and export-led
growth, South Korea created numerous job opportunities, and the labor force transitioned from
agriculture to higher-productivity industries.

The emphasis on education and skill development also played a crucial role in building a skilled labor force
capable of supporting the growing industries. South Korea's sustained economic growth and employment
generation earned it the nickname of the "Miracle on the Han River."

These case studies demonstrate how targeted and well-coordinated policy interventions can effectively tackle
unemployment and foster economic growth. By implementing labor market reforms, investing in education and
skill development, and pursuing targeted industrial policies, countries can create a conducive environment for
job creation and economic prosperity. The experiences of Germany and South Korea offer valuable lessons for
policymakers around the world seeking to address unemployment and achieve sustained economic growth.

VIII. CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the relationship between unemployment and economic growth is intricate and multidimensional,
significantly influencing the overall well-being and performance of an economy. unemployment, encompassing
cyclical, structural, and frictional aspects, can pose significant challenges, affecting consumer spending,
government finances, and social stability. on the other hand, economic growth, driven by factors like investment,
innovation, and productivity, has the potential to generate job opportunities and improve living standards for the
population.

Policy interventions play a crucial role in addressing unemployment and fostering sustainable economic growth.
these interventions should be tailored to address specific challenges and opportunities within each economy.
monetary and fiscal policies can be employed to stimulate economic activity, while labor market reforms and
education initiatives can enhance workforce skills and job matching. support for small and medium-sized
enterprises, infrastructure development, and sustainable initiatives also contribute to economic growth and
employment creation.

Case studies from countries like germany and south korea highlight successful examples of policy interventions
that have effectively tackled unemployment and spurred economic growth. the german hartz reforms and south
korea's industrialization and development policies demonstrate the positive impact of targeted and well-
coordinated measures.

While addressing unemployment and achieving sustainable economic growth can be complex, it is essential for
governments and policymakers to adopt a holistic and adaptive approach. the quest for a balanced economy
requires constant monitoring and fine-tuning of policies to meet evolving challenges and seize opportunities.

by understanding the dynamics between unemployment and economic growth and learning from successful
policy interventions, countries can build more resilient and prosperous economies. a focus on inclusive growth,
human capital development, and entrepreneurship can lead to a more equitable distribution of opportunities and
a brighter future for societies worldwide. ultimately, the pursuit of reducing unemployment and fostering
economic growth remains a critical endeavor in enhancing the well-being and prosperity of nations and their
citizens.

IX. REFERENCES
[1] Abdul-Khaliq S, Soufan T, Shihab RA (2014) The relationship between unemployment and economic growth rate in Arab Country. J
Econ Sustain Develop 5(9):56–59.

[2] Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Page 126
International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) E-ISSN: 2581-5946

DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p115

Volume: 6 Issue: 4 July to August 2023 https://www.ijsmsjournal.org

[3] Barro, R. J. (1990). Economic growth and convergence across the United States (NBER Working Paper No. 3419). National Bureau
of Economic Research.

[4] Barro, R. J. (2001). Human capital and growth. American Economic Review, 91(2), 12-17.

[5] Blanchard, O. (1998). The hysteresis of unemployment: A review. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1-76.

[6] Summers, L. H. (1988). Why is the unemployment rate so very high near full employment? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,
2, 339-384.

[7] Chand K, Tiwari R, Phuyal M (2017). Economic growth and unemployment rate: an empirical study of Indian economy. PRAGATI:
J Indian Econ 4(2):130–137.

[8] Eriksson, C. (1997). Is there a trade-off between employment and growth? Oxford Economic Papers 49, 77-88.

[9] Khrais I, ve Al-Wadi M (2016). Economic growth and unemployment relationship: an empirical study for MENA countries. Int J
Managerial Stud Res 4(12):19–24.

[10] Summers, L. H. (1981). Investment and unemployment: The role of profit margins. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 187-
231.

[11] Summers, L. H. (1988). Macroeconomics and labor market policy. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41(3), 363-378.

[12] Summers, L. H. (1999). On the welfare consequences of the increase in inequality in the United States. Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 13(2), 3-19.

[13] Summers, L. H. (1985). Flexible exchange rates and employment policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 85-150.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Page 127