See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]

net/publication/269131303

Effect of Condenser Air Flow on the Performance of Split Air Conditioner

Conference Paper · November 2011

DOI: 10.3384/ecp110572134

CITATIONS READS

22 2,676

2 authors:

Amr Owes Elsayed Abdulrahman Hariri

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Engineering Imam Abdul Rahman bin Faisal University
18 PUBLICATIONS 190 CITATIONS 3 PUBLICATIONS 31 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Abdulrahman Hariri on 18 June 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

Effect of Condenser Air Flow on the Performance of Split Air Conditioner

Amr O. Elsayed1,*, Abdulrahman S. Hariri1

1
College of Engineering, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia
* Corresponding author. Tel: +966551885676, Fax: +966 3 8584331, E-mail:amro9992000@[Link]

Abstract: Split air conditioning units are usually used for small and medium scale residential buildings.
Therefore, more energy efficiency and lower cost are needed along with reliable control for the air conditioning
units. An experimental investigation has been carried out to study the performance of a direct expansion air
conditioning (A/C) unit having a variable speed condenser fan. The modulation of heat rejection airflow has
been controlled with the outdoor air temperature via a Proportional Integral Differential (PID) controller. The
control algorithm allows increasing the speed of condenser fan with the increase of outdoor air temperature and
vice verse. The maximum rated air flow of the fan is 0.43 m3/s at 42ºC outdoor air temperature and the minimum
is 0.28m3/s. To facilitate variation of refrigerant flow rate according to the evaporator load, the traditional
capillary tube was replaced with a suitable thermostatic expansion valve and liquid refrigerant reserve. The
influence of condenser airflow and its temperature on the A/C unit performance and compressor power
consumption has been investigated and presented at different evaporator cooling load. It has been found that a 10
% reduction in compressor power consumption is achieved by increasing the condenser air flow by about 50%.

Keywords: Split air conditioners, A/C unit performance, Variable speed condenser fan.

Nomenclature
COP coefficient of performance Tcond condensation temperature...….…°C
h refrigerant enthalpy….….…...[Link]-1 Qev evaporator cooling capacity...... kW
mref refrigerant flow rate……….…. kg.s-1 Wcomp compressor power consumption...kW
P pressure………………………….kPa WFan condenser fan power…………….kW
Tev evaporation temperature….…… °C
1. Introduction
Energy saving is the practice of decreasing the quantity of energy used. It may be achieved
through efficient energy use or by reducing the consumption of energy services [e.g. 1-3]. Air
conditioning units are usually used for small and medium scale residential buildings. The
amount of energy consumed by air conditioners, refrigerators and water heaters is increasing
rapidly, since the consumed power by air conditioners occupies about 20% of the total power
consumption. The improvement of refrigeration cycle performance can be done by lowering
the compressor power consumption, increasing the condenser heat rejection capacity or
reducing the difference between condenser and evaporator pressures.

A. Benamer and D. Clodic [4] offered a method for the comparison of energy consumption of
variable and fixed speed scroll compressor in a refrigeration system. They showed that the
lower the heat load, the higher the energy savings associated with variable speed. Also,
variable speed compressor generates up to 40% savings in power consumption. S. Hu and B.
Huang [5] presented a high efficiency split residential water-cooled air conditioner that
utilizes cellulose pads as a filling material of the cooling tower. They showed that the water
cooled condenser results in decreasing the compressor power consumption from 1.189 to 1.02
kW and the cycle COP is improved from 2.96 to 3.45. S. Wang et al. [6] presented a split air
conditioner with a hybrid equipment of energy storage and water heater all year around. In
summer, ice storage coils work as evaporator. In winter, energy storage tank absorbs the
condenser heat to store heat during the heating process. They obtained around 28% increase
in cooling capacity and 21.5% improvement in the COP. F. Yu and K. Chan [7] showed how
the COP of air-cooled chillers can be improved by modulating heat rejection airflow via
World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

variable speed condenser fans. They introduced an algorithm that makes use of a set point of
condensing temperature to determine the number and speed of condenser fans staged to
provide the airflow required for any given heat rejection. Also, in order to achieve maximum
COP under condensing temperature control with variable speed condenser fans, the set point
of condensing temperature should be adjusted based on the chiller load together with the
outdoor temperature. Potential energy saving for using water cooled air conditioner in
residential building has been illustrated by H. Chen et al. [8]. A split air conditioner with air
and water cooled options was set up for experimental study at different indoor and outdoor
conditions. The overall energy saving were estimated to be around 8.7% of the total electricity
consumption.

Recently, T. Mahlia and R. Saidur [9] reviewed requirements and specifications of various
international test standards for testing and rating of room air conditioners and refrigerators
sacking for efficiency improvement of these appliances. Also, M. Jiang et al [10] evaluated
the influence of condensing heat recovery on the dynamic behavior and performance of air
conditioners. They showed that the condensing heat recovery has a negative effect on the
cooling capacity at the start of the heat recovery process, while the average COP of the
system is improved.

As shown in the previous literature, variable speed condenser fans have been handled for a
large scale (i.e. chiller). The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of
condenser heat rejection modulation, via a variable speed fan, on the energy consumption and
on the performance of a residential air conditioner. The speed of condenser fan is
simultaneously controlled with the outdoor air temperature. The characteristics of
refrigeration cycle that served by a thermostatic expansion valve will be presented at different
indoor and outdoor temperatures at the steady state operation condition.

2. Experimental apparatus and procedure

A split type, 2.64 kW nominal capacity, air conditioner using R-22 was employed to exam the
modulation of condenser heat rejection and its effect on the conditioner performance. The
conditioner contains the basic components of a vapor compression system: a compressor, a
condenser, a capillary tube, an evaporator and such attachments as filter/dryer and fans. The
indoor unit includes a DX evaporator with copper tubes and aluminum fins, a fan and a
capillary tube. The outdoor unit includes a constant speed rotary compressor and an aluminum
finned-plate condenser that is provided with a constant speed propeller fan. The cooling
output has ON/OFF control in accordance with the indoor set point temperature.

The normal method of adjusting the refrigerant mass flow in the evaporator is to add an
expansion valve and an accumulator to the system. Therefore, a thermostatic expansion valve
(with 0-1 orifice) and 1 kg liquid refrigerant accumulator have been installed in the
refrigeration cycle. The condenser fan was employed to extract the room air through a foam
duct and discharge it outside the room as shown in Photo 1, where Photo 2 shows the
evaporating unit. Electric heaters were installed in the path of entering air to evaporator and
condenser. Each heater was connected with a variable capacity transformer to control the
heater power.

The refrigeration cycle of the conditioner was provided with controlling and measuring
devices at the key locations of cycle. A schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus is
shown in Fig. 1.
World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

Photo 1: Condensing unit Photo 2: Evaporating unit

Controller
Fan

T
Condenser
T
P
T T

Compressor
P T

T
T
T Expansion
T
valve
Evaporator

Fig. 1 A schematic view of the experimental apparatus

The temperature was measured via a type-T thermocouple with a maximum uncertainty of ±
0.2ºC. Thermocouples were placed at the inlet and outlet of the evaporator and condenser.
Also, thermocouples were installed along the tube length of the evaporator and condenser to
determine the condensation and evaporation temperatures. The thermocouple junctions were
soldered at the outer surface of the tubes and the thermocouple wires were connected to a
digital thermometer. The condition of air at the inlet and outlet of each of evaporator and
condenser was measured by means of a digital humidity/temperature meter with 1% accuracy
of relative humidity and ±0.1 accuracy of dry bulb temperature. The liquid refrigerant mass
flow rate was measured by a calibrated flowmeter with a maximum uncertainty of ±0.5 kg/hr.
A digital wattmeter with ±1% reading uncertainty was provided to measure the compressor
power consumption.

A Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller was used to control the speed of
condenser fan. The controller had been connected with a temperature sensor, thermistor
(LM35), which was positioned inside the foam duct at the front of condenser. When the
condenser inlet air temperature is increased above the desired set point, the condenser fan
speed is increased and vice verse. The velocity of air at the inlet condenser coil was measured
via a digital vane anemometer with 0.1 m/s accuracy, where the air velocity inside the
condenser duct was ranged from 1.25 to 1.9 m/s.

It is worth mentioning that the room temperature was maintained at 24-26 ºC during the
experiments. All test runs were performed in an identical manner and at the steady state
condition.
World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

3- Data reduction
As mentioned, the air velocity (m/s) inside the condenser duct is measured via a vane
anemometer and the rate of air flow (m3/s) is calculated by multiplying the duct cross section
into the average air velocity. The evaporator cooling capacity, Qev, can be calculated as:
Qev = mref (h1-h4) (1)
Where: h1, h4 are enthalpies of the refrigerant at evaporator inlet and outlet, respectively
(kJ/kg). The common approach in determining the refrigeration cycle performance is to use
the coefficient of performance, COP, depending on the compressor power consumption as;
COP = Qev / Wcomp (2)

4. Results and discussion

The performance of the refrigeration cycle is a result of the balance between the four essential
cycle components. When the outside ambient temperature varies, it affects the performance of
the condenser, which in turn, affects the performance of the evaporator, expansion device and
the compressor. The affecting parameters that influence the conditioner performance have
been considered for illustration. Also, the modulation of condenser heat rejection airflow and
its effect on the conditioner performance has been presented.

4.1. Effect of evaporator inlet air temperature

The refrigeration load of indoor unit may vary due to several reasons, such as the variation of
ambient temperature. The influence of evaporator entering air temperature (return air
temperature) on the evaporating temperature and evaporator cooling capacity, Qev, is
presented in Fig. 2. It is observed in this figure that higher cooling capacity is achieved at
26ºC which is the design operation condition recommended by manufacturers. As the inlet air
temperature increases the evaporating temperature increases and the cooling capacity
decrease.
Compressor power consumption (W)

14 8 1200 5

Coefficient of Performance, COP

Power Comsumption
Evaporating temperature ( oC)

Evaporating temperature
12
Cooling capacity COP
Cooling capacity (kW)

6 1000 4
10

8 4 800 3

6
2 600 2
4

2 0 400 1
20 25 30 35 40 24 26 28 30 32 34 36

Evaporator inlet air temperature (oC) Evaporator inlet air temperature (oC)

Fig.2 Variation of evaporator entering air Fig.3 Effect of evaporator inlet air
temperature with evaporating temperature temperature on compressor power
and evaporator cooling capacity consumption and cycle COP
World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

The reduction of Qev is about 25%, when the inlet air temperature increased from 26 to 35ºC.
This reduction in Qev is referred to the evaporator starving which reduces the heat transfer
coefficient in evaporator, since there is no sufficient refrigerant to accommodate the heat load.
Here, it should be mentioned that the degree of superheating was varying from 5 to 9 ºC and
the corresponding mass flow rate of the refrigerant varied from 0.0106 to 0.0133 kg/s. Also,
the degree of subcooling was varying from 2 to 3 ºC. Fig. 3 reveals that when the inlet air
temperature increases the compressor power consumption increases causing a reduction in the
coefficient of performance of the cycle. The increase of power consumption is about 12%,
while the reduction of COP is about 35%.

4.2. Effect of condenser inlet air temperature

The effect of condenser inlet air temperature on the cycle performance is shown in figures 4
and [Link] temperature of air entering the condenser was varied by heating the supply air to
the desired temperature. During these experiments, the ambient temperature was kept constant
at 26 ºC and the speed of condenser fan was constant which gives 0.28m 3/s of air. It is seen
from Fig. 4 that the condensation temperature increases as the inlet air temperature increases,
as expected, and the cooling capacity decreases with the increase of condenser temperature.
This reduction in cooling capacity is due to the increase of evaporation temperature which is
accompanied with the condenser temperature, since the compressor has a constant speed. The
reduction of cooling capacity is about 32% as the condensing temperature increased by 17%.
Fig.5 shows the variation of compressor power consumption and the cycle COP with the
condensation temperature. The increase in condensing temperature, so thus the condenser
pressure and the pressure ratio, leads to an increase in power consumption and a decrease in
the cycle COP. The power consumption is increased by 36% and the reduction in COP is
about 45% as shown in the figure.
Compressor power consumption (W)

60 6 1600 8

Coefficient of performance, COP

Condensation temperature (oC)

Condensation Temperature Power Consumption

1400
Cooling Capacity 5
COP
Cooling capacity (kW)

6
50 1200
4

1000
3 4
40 800
2
600
2
1
30 400

0 200 0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 40 42 44 46 48 50 52

Condenser inlet air temperature (oC) Condensation temperature (oC)

Fig.4 Variation of condenser entering air Fig.5 Effect of condensation temperature

temperature with condensing temperature on compressor power consumption and
and evaporator cooling capacity cycle COP

4.3. Modulation of condenser air flow at constant inlet air temperature

During these experiments, the temperature of air, which cools the condenser, was kept
constant at 36ºC and the airflow through the condenser was varied by controlling the speed of
fan manually. Although the increased heat rejection airflow causes the additional fan electric
World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

demand, the decreased condensing temperature results in a considerable reduction in

compressor electric demand. This is shown in Fig.6, as the rate of air flow increases from 0.28
to 0.43 m3/s the condensing temperature decreased by about 8% and the corresponding
reduction in compressor power consumption is about 10%. These findings indicate that the
compressor power depends on how condenser fan is controlled to provide the heat rejection
airflow required for any given cooling capacity.

50 1200

Compressor power consumption (W)

Condensation Temperature
Condensation temperature (oC)

Power Consumption
1100
45

1000
40

900

35
800

30
700

Condenser inlet air temperature = 36 oC

25 600
0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45

Air flow rate of condenser cooling (m3/s)

Fig.6 Variation of condenser airflow with condensation temperature and compressor power
consumption

4.4. Modulation of condenser air flow at different inlet air temperature

The condensing temperature can be controlled at a minimum point by modulating the heat
rejection airflow continuously. During these experiments, the condenser fan speed was varied
according to the condenser inlet air temperature that represents outdoor air temperature. To
show the effect of variable air flow for improving condenser heat rejection, a comparison
between constant and variable fan speed has been presented in Figs. 7-9. Fig.7 illustrates the
variation of condensing temperature with the inlet air temperature for constant and variable
airflow.

55
Condensation temperataure (oC)

Variable Speed Fan (0.28 - 0.43 m3/s)

50 Constant Speed Fan (0.28 m3/s)

45

40

35
20 25 30 35 40 45 50
o
Condenser inlet air temperature ( C)
Fig.7 Variation of condensing temperature with condenser inlet air temperature for constant and
variable airflow
World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

As expected, by increasing the rate of airflow an improvement in condenser heat rejection is

observed during which the condensing temperature has been reduced by 7% at 42ºC inlet air
temperature as shown in figure. The corresponding reduction in compressor power
consumption is recorded in Fig.8. It is seen from this figure that at 42ºC inlet air temperature
the power consumption has been reduced by about 15%, while at 36ºC inlet air temperature
the reduction is about 9%. As mentioned earlier, the increase of heat rejection airflow needs
an additional fan electric demand; however, this demand is small compared with the energy
saved by the compressor. In addition, the max power required for condenser fan is only used
at the peak of outdoor air.
Compressor power consumption (W)

1400 4

Coefficient of performance, COP

Variable Speed Fan Variable Speed Fan
Constant Speed Fan Constant Speed Fan
1200 3

1000 2

800 1

600 0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Condenser inlet air temperature (oC) Condenser inlet air temperature (oC)
Fig.8 Variation of compressor power Fig.9 Variation of cycle COP with
consumption with condenser inlet air condenser inlet air temperature for
temperature for constant and variable airflow constant and variable airflow

Fig.9 reveals the coefficient of performance of the conditioner during constant and variable
airflow for condenser cooling. It is seen in this figure that, the COP of the cycle decreases as
the condenser inlet air temperature increases for both constant and variable airflow. Since the
increase in compressor power consumption is higher than the increase of the evaporator
cooling capacity, so the COP of the cycle decreases. On the other hand, an improvement,
about 28%, in the cycle COP is observed for variable condenser airflow due to the lower
compressor power consumption.

To evaluate the energy saving due to the improvement of COP, shown in Fig. 9, the unit
coefficient of performance is presented in Fig. 10. This performance coefficient includes the
power consumption of the condenser fan and is defined as:

COPU = Qev / (Wcomp + WFan) (3)

As Fig. 10 shows, the unit COPU for variable condenser fan is greater than that for constant
speed fan. The profit payback of the present energy saving method can be calculated by the
economic analysis. The retrofitting of the present conditioner will be handled in a future
work.
World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

Unit coefficient of performance, COPU

4 6

Coefficient of performance, COP

Present unit
Variable Speed Fan
5 Water cooled condenser unit [5]
Constant Speed Fan
3
4

2 3

2
1
1

0 0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52

Condenser inlet air temperature (oC) Condensation temperature (oC)

Fig.10 Variation of unit COP with condenser Fig.11 Comparison between the COP of the
inlet air temperature present conditioner and water cooled high
performance conditioner in Ref [5]

The study is conducted to compare the present conditioner performance with the performance
of water-cooled air conditioner in Ref [5]. As shown in Fig. 11, the COP of the water-cooled
air conditioner is higher by about 35% than that for the present conditioner. This is due to the
high heat capacity of water compared with the air.

5. Conclusions
From the above findings, it can be concluded that:
- The power consumption of the compressor was increased by 12% and the cooling capacity
was decreased by 25%, when rising the evaporator inlet air temperature from 26 to 35 ºC.
- The cooling capacity of the evaporator was decreased by 32% when rising the condenser
entering air temperature from 30 to 42ºC, while the compressor power consumption was
increased by about 36 %.
- At constant inlet air temperature, a 10 % reduction in compressor power consumption has
been obtained when increasing the condenser cooling air flow by about 1.5 times.
- For variable speed condenser fan, it is found that the compressor power requirement has
been reduced by 15% at 42ºC condenser entering air temperature; while at 36ºC the
reduction is about 9%.
- The use of variable speed condenser fan causes an increase in the COP of the conditioner
by 28% at 42ºC condenser entering air temperature.

Variable speed motor is recommended for the condenser fan with advanced control to
accommodate the variation of outdoor air temperature for tracking and adjusting the
condensing temperature.

References
[1] C.F. Gao, W.L. Lee, and Hua Chen, Locating Room Air-Conditioners at Floor Level for
Energy Saving in Residential Buildings, Applied Thermal Engineering, 29, issues 2-3,
2009, pp. 310-316.
 World Renewable Energy Congress 2011 – Sweden Low-Energy Architecture (LEA)
8-11 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

[2] E. Hajidavalloo, H. Eghtedari, Performance Improvement of Air -Cooled Refrigeration

System by Using Evaporatively Cooled Air Condenser, Int. Journal of Refrigeration, 33,
issue 5, 2010, pp. 982-988.
[3] Zhenjun Xu, Huaizhi Wu, Meiling Wu, Energy Performance and Consumption for
Biogas Heat Pump Air Conditioner, Energy, 35, issue 12, 2010, pp. 5497-5502.
[4] A. Benamer, D. Clodic, Comparison of Energy Efficiency Between Variable and Fixed
Speed Scroll Compressors in Refrigeration System, Proceedings of technological
innovations in refrigeration in air conditioning and in the food industry into third
millennium, 8th-9 June, 1999, pp.1-8.
[5] S.S. Hu, B.J. Huang, Study of a High Efficiency Residential Split Water-Cooled Air
Conditioner, Applied Thermal Engineering, 25, 2005, pp. 1599–1613.
[6] S. Wang, Z. Liu, Y. Li, K. Zhao and Z. Wang, Experimental Study on Split Air
Conditioner with New Hybrid Equipment of Energy Storage and Water Heater All Year
Round, Energy Conversion and Management, 46, 2005, pp. 3047–3059.
[7] F.W. Yu and K.T. Chan, Advanced Control of Heat Rejection Airflow for Improving the
Coefficient of Performance of Air Cooled Chillers, Applied Thermal Engineering, 26,
2006, pp. 97–110.
[8] H. Chen, W.L. Lee and F.W. Yik, Applying Water Cooled Air Conditioners in
Residential Buildings in Hong Kong, Energy Conversion and Management, 49, 2008, pp.
1416–1423.
[9] T. Mahlia and R. Saidur, A Review on Test Procedure Energy Efficiency Standards and
Energy Labels for Room Air Conditioners and Refrigerator-Freezers, Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, Issue 7, 2010, pp. 1888-1900.
[10] M. L. Jiang, J. Yi Wu, Y. X. Xu and R. Z. Wang, Transient Characteristics and
Performance Analysis of a Vapor Compression Air Conditioning System with
Condensing Heat Recovery, Energy and Buildings, 42, Issue 11, 2010, pp. 2251-2257.

View publication stats