Boundaries 1 Key
Boundaries 1 Key
Rationale
Choice C is the best answer. A comma is the appropriate way to link the dependent clause “While...not” and the
independent clause that follows.
Choice A is incorrect. This choice creates a run-on sentence error. “While...not” is a dependent clause, which
must be separated from the independent clause that follows with some sort of punctuation. Choice B is
incorrect. This choice creates a sentence fragment. “While one requires oxygen and one does not” isn’t an
independent clause, so it can’t stand alone as a complete sentence. Choice D is incorrect. This choice creates a
punctuation error. “While one requires oxygen and one does not” isn’t an independent clause, so it can’t be
linked to the clause that follows with a semicolon.
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. The convention being tested is the coordination of main clauses within a
sentence. This choice correctly uses a comma and the coordinating conjunction “but” to join the first main
clause (“Human-made...fibers”) and the second main clause (“the manufacture...water”).
Choice A is incorrect because it results in a comma splice. Without a conjunction following it, a comma can’t
be used in this way to join two main clauses. Choice B is incorrect because when coordinating two longer
main clauses such as these, it’s conventional to use a comma before the coordinating conjunction. Choice C is
incorrect because it results in a run-on sentence. The two main clauses are fused without punctuation and/or
a conjunction.
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. Notice that "the sanctity of animal life" is the first item in a list of three things. We
must use a comma to separate the first two items in the list, just as a comma is used to separate "the just
treatment of the elderly" and "the abolition of the slave trade."
Choice A is incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error. Notice that "the sanctity of animal life" is the
first item in a list of three things. To appropriately format the list, we need punctuation to separate each item.
Choice B is incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error. Notice that "the sanctity of animal life" is the
first item in a list of three things. While semicolons are sometimes used to separate list items, this list uses
commas to separate the other list items, and lists must use the same punctuation throughout. Choice C is
incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error. Notice that "the sanctity of animal life" is the first item in a
list of three things. While colons can be used to introduce lists, they can’t be used to separate items within a
list.
Rationale
Choice C is the best answer. The clause “A subseasonal…advance” and the clause “its predictions…forecast” are
both independent clauses, so using a semicolon to separate them is grammatically correct.
Choice A is incorrect. This choice creates a run-on sentence error. The clause “A subseasonal…advance” and
the clause “its predictions…forecast” are both independent clauses, so a comma is not enough to separate
them. Choice B is incorrect. This choice creates a run-on sentence error. The clause “A subseasonal…advance”
and the clause “its predictions…forecast” are both independent clauses, so they need to be separated with
specific punctuation (a period, a semi-colon, a colon, a dash, or a comma + a coordinating conjunction). Choice
D is incorrect. This choice creates a run-on sentence error. The clause “A subseasonal…advance” and the
clause “its predictions…forecast” are both independent clauses, so the word “and” by itself is not enough to
separate them. There would need to be a comma before “and” for this choice to work.
Rationale
Choice B is the best answer. “Themes of childhood” is one noun phrase, with “themes of” implicitly carrying
over to the other items on the list (“themes of childhood, [themes of] womanhood, and [themes of] Chinese
American identity”).
Choice A is incorrect. This choice inappropriately breaks up the introduction of a list. Also, “In her book…
themes of” is not an independent clause, thanks to the dangling “of” at the end, so it can’t precede a
colon. Choice C is incorrect. This choice inappropriately breaks up the introduction of a list. Also, “In her
book…themes of” is not an independent clause, thanks to the dangling “of” at the end, so it can’t precede a
single dash. Choice D is incorrect. This choice inappropriately breaks up the introduction of a list. “Themes of”
implicitly carries over to each item on the list (“themes of childhood, [themes of] womanhood, and [themes of]
Chinese American identity”), so we don’t want to use a comma to separate it.
Rationale
Choice B is the best answer. The convention being tested is punctuation between a subordinate clause and a
main clause. This choice correctly uses a comma to mark the boundary between the subordinate clause
(“Because...content”) and the main clause (“scientists...settlements”).
Choice A is incorrect. Joining the subordinate clause (“Because...content”) and the clause that follows
(“scientists...settlements”) with the conjunction “and” results in an ungrammatical sentence that lacks a main
clause. Choice C is incorrect because it fails to mark the boundary between the subordinate clause and the
main clause with appropriate punctuation. Choice D is incorrect. Joining the subordinate clause
(“Because...content”) and the clause that follows (“scientists...settlements”) with a comma and the conjunction
“and” results in an ungrammatical sentence that lacks a main clause.
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. This sentence is a statement: “Moskowitz was hired by a soda company to
determine how much artificial sweetener most people prefer in a diet drink.” So a period is the most
appropriate punctuation mark.
Choice A is incorrect. This doesn’t complete the text in a way that conforms to the conventions of Standard
English. This sentence is not a question—it’s a statement. So a question mark is not the appropriate
punctuation. Choice B is incorrect. This doesn’t complete the text in a way that conforms to the conventions of
Standard English. We already have the verbs “was hired…to determine” in this sentence. The verb “do” is not
needed and results in a confusing, ungrammatical sentence. Choice C is incorrect. This doesn’t complete the
text in a way that conforms to the conventions of Standard English. This sentence is not a question—it’s a
statement. So a question mark is not the appropriate punctuation.
Rationale
Choice B is the best answer. This choice uses a comma to correctly separate the dependent clause "although…
asteroids" from the independent clause "several hundred have been…Mars."
Choice A is incorrect. This choice results in a sentence fragment. "Although…asteroids" is a dependent clause.
It can’t stand on its own as a sentence, which means it can’t end in a period. Choice C is incorrect. This choice
results in a punctuation error. "Although…asteroids" is a dependent clause and can’t be joined to the
independent clause "several hundred have been…Mars" with a semicolon. A semicolon can only join two
independent clauses. Choice D is incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error. A colon can only come
after an independent clause, but "although…asteroids" is a dependent clause.
Rationale
Choice C is the best answer. The word “from” introduces a prepositional phrase that modifies the noun “pages”
and provides essential information about their origin. No additional punctuation is needed after “from” in this
context.
Choice A is incorrect. This choice results in a punctuation error, illogically separating the preposition “from”
from the rest of the prepositional phrase with a colon. Also, a colon can only follow an independent clause, but
what comes before the blank could not stand on its own as a complete sentence. Choice B is incorrect. This
choice results in a punctuation error, illogically separating the preposition “from” from the rest of the
prepositional phrase with a comma. Choice D is incorrect. This choice results in a punctuation error, illogically
separating the preposition “from” from the rest of the prepositional phrase with a dash.
Rationale
Choice B is the best answer. This choice correctly uses commas to set off the nonessential relative clause
"which is known as Brownian motion" that provides extra information about the "random, continuous
movement" that isn’t necessary for the function of the sentence.
Choice A is incorrect. This choice results in a punctuation error. The relative clause "which is known as
Brownian motion" is a nonessential supplement. Nonessential supplements need to be set apart from the rest
of the sentence with a pair of commas, dashes, or parentheses, so we can’t use a colon here. Also, notice that
colons can only come after an independent clause, which isn’t the case here. Choice C is incorrect. This choice
results in a punctuation error. The relative clause "which is known as Brownian motion" is a nonessential
supplement, so it should be separated from the rest of the sentence by a pair of matching punctuation marks.
We already have a comma after "motion," so we need to add a comma before "which." This choice is missing
that comma. Choice D is incorrect. This choice results in a sentence fragment. "This type of random,
continuous movement" is not an independent clause and can’t stand alone as a full sentence, so we can’t put a
period here.
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. The comma appropriately separates the nonessential descriptive aside "such as…
scene" from the independent clause "Theaters were…movie." Since the descriptive example of roses isn’t
necessary for the sentence to function, it needs to be set off with punctuation.
Choice A is incorrect. This choice results in a run-on sentence. Since the example of roses isn’t necessary for
the sentence to function, the descriptive aside "such as…scene" needs to be separated from the preceding
independent clause with some sort of punctuation. Choice B is incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation
error. A semicolon can only be used to separate two independent clauses, but "such…scene" is not an
independent clause and couldn’t stand on its own as a sentence. Choice C is incorrect. This choice results in a
sentence fragment. The descriptive aside "Such…scene" is not an independent clause and can’t stand on its
own as a sentence.
Rationale
Choice B is the best answer. The convention being tested is the punctuation of items in a series. The comma
after “themselves” is used conventionally to separate the first item (“they can clone themselves”) and the
second item (“enter a dormant state in times of drought”) in the series of things mosses can do.
Choice A is incorrect because a semicolon can’t be used in this way to separate items in a simple series such
as this. Choice C is incorrect because it results in a rhetorically unacceptable sentence fragment beginning
with “And enter.” Choice D is incorrect because it fails to use appropriate punctuation to separate the first and
second items in the series.
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. The convention being tested is punctuation between a verb and a prepositional
phrase. No punctuation is needed between the verb “blend” and the prepositional phrase “with Charlie
Adams’s delightfully catchy vocal melodies.” The prepositional phrase completes the idea of the sentence,
explaining with what Koperqualuk’s guitar riffs blend.
Choice A is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the verb and the prepositional phrase.
Choice B is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the verb and the prepositional
phrase. Choice C is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the verb and the prepositional
phrase.
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. It appropriately uses a period to mark the end of one independent clause ("In
2000…settings") and the start of another ("She founded…professionals").
Choice A is incorrect. This choice results in a run-on sentence error. Both the clause before the blank ("In
2000…settings") and the clause after the blank ("she…professionals") are independent clauses, so they need to
be separated by punctuation. Choice B is incorrect. This choice results in a comma splice error. It incorrectly
joins two independent clauses with just a comma. Linking two independent clauses with a comma also
requires the use of a coordinating conjunction (like for, and, nor, but, or, yet, or so). Choice C is incorrect. This
choice results in a run-on sentence, an error caused when two independent clauses are joined without
punctuation or appropriate conjunctions. Since both the clause before the blank ("In 2000…settings") and the
clause after the blank ("she…professionals") are independent, a comma would be required in addition to the
coordinating conjunction "and."
Rationale
Choice A is the best answer. The convention being tested here is punctuation between a verb and object. No
punctuation is needed between the verb ("appreciate") and its object ("the multiple references..."). The object
helps complete the idea of the verb—in this case, it explains what fans of science fiction will appreciate—and
any punctuation between the two results in an ungrammatical sentence.
Choice B is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the verb and its object. Choice C is incorrect
because no punctuation is needed between the verb and its object. Choice D is incorrect because no
punctuation is needed between the verb and its object.
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. No punctuation should separate the verb "unearthed" and its objects (i.e, what was
"unearthed"): "knives, horseshoes, wool tunics, and thousands of other artifacts."
Choice A is incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error, separating the verb "unearthed" from its objects
(i.e, what was "unearthed") with a colon. Choice B is incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error,
separating the verb "unearthed" from its objects (i.e, what was "unearthed") with a comma. Choice C is
incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error, separating the verb "unearthed" from its objects (i.e, what
was "unearthed") with a dash.
Rationale
Choice A is the best answer. “That is…field” is an essential supplement, so we should not use punctuation to
separate it from “scuba diving club.” .
Choice B is incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error. “That is…field” is an essential supplement, so we
should not use a comma (or any kind of punctuation) to separate it from “scuba diving club.” . Choice C is
incorrect. This choice creates a punctuation error. “That is…field” is an essential supplement, so we should not
use a dash (or any kind of punctuation) to separate it from “scuba diving club.” . Choice D is incorrect. This
choice creates a run-on sentence. It makes “that is…United States” into an awkward independent clause, but it
also makes “that has…field” into its own awkward independent clause without the correct punctuation
separating it.
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. The clause before the colon tells us that the novel “asks a question,” so the clause
after the colon should be in the conventional form of a question: with the verb before the subject, and a
question mark at the end.
Choice A is incorrect. This choice ends the sentence with a period, which isn’t right. The clause before the
colon tells us that the novel “asks a question,” so the clause after the colon should be that question. Choice B is
incorrect. This choice ends the sentence with a period, which isn’t right. The clause before the colon tells us
that the novel “asks a question,” so the clause after the colon should be that question. In Standard English,
questions place the verb before the subject and end with a question mark. Choice C is incorrect. This choice
doesn’t conform to the conventions of Standard English. In Standard English, questions place the verb before
the subject.
ID: 9f0ac61d
1.19
Dolores Huerta’s advocacy on behalf of farmworkers was rooted in her experience as a schoolteacher in Stockton, California,
in the early 1950s. Hoping to help her students and their families outside the ______ Huerta left teaching to start the Stockton
chapter of the Community Service Organization, a group focused on the needs of local farmworkers.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A. classroom.
B. classroom;
C. classroom,
D. classroom
Rationale
Choice C is the best answer. The convention being tested is the use of punctuation within a sentence. This choice correctly
uses a comma to mark the boundary between the introductory participial phrase ("Hoping…classroom") and the main clause
("Huerta…farmworkers").
Choice A is incorrect because it results in a rhetorically unacceptable sentence fragment beginning with "hoping." Choice B is
incorrect because a semicolon can’t be used in this way to mark the boundary between the participial phrase ("Hoping…
classroom") and the main clause ("Huerta…farmworkers"). Choice D is incorrect because it fails to mark the boundary
between the participial phrase ("Hoping…classroom") and the main clause ("Huerta…farmworkers").
ID: 6997261f
1.20
In 2009, researchers determined that pottery fragments from a cave in China were close to 18,000 years old. These are some
of the oldest ______ of pottery ever found.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A. pieces:
B. pieces,
C. pieces
D. pieces—
Rationale
Choice C is the best answer. The convention being tested is punctuation use between a noun and a prepositional phrase. No
punctuation is needed between the noun "pieces" and the prepositional phrase "of pottery." The prepositional phrase
provides essential information about what kind of pieces were found, so it shouldn’t be separated from the rest of the noun
phrase ("some of the oldest pieces") with punctuation.
Choice A is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the noun phrase "some of the oldest pieces" and the
prepositional phrase "of pottery." Choice B is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the noun phrase "some of
the oldest pieces" and the prepositional phrase "of pottery." Choice D is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between
the noun phrase "some of the oldest pieces" and the prepositional phrase "of pottery."
ID: eb03096e
1.21
According to the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, aloha ʻāina is “a recognition, commitment, and practice sustaining the ea—
or life breath” between the Hawaiian people and their natural environments. The concept has been proudly embodied ______
Native Hawaiians for generations, contributing to the lush flora and renowned beauty of the islands.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A. by;
B. by:
C. by,
D. by
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. The convention being tested is punctuation use between a preposition and its complement. No
punctuation is needed between the preposition "by" and its complement "Native Hawaiians." The complement completes the
meaning of the preposition in the phrase "proudly embodied by Native Hawaiians," and any punctuation within it results in an
ungrammatical sentence.
Choice A is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement. Choice B is incorrect
because no punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement. Choice C is incorrect because no
punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement.
ID: b5ff8f8e
1.22
The element carbon has the highest melting point ______ all the elements on the periodic table—3,500 degrees Celsius.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A. of
B. of—
C. of,
D. of:
Rationale
Choice A is the best answer. The convention being tested is punctuation use between a preposition and its complement. No
punctuation is needed between the preposition "of" and its complement "all the elements on the periodic table." The
complement completes the meaning of the preposition in the phrase "the highest melting point of all the elements on the
periodic table," and using punctuation to separate the complement from the preposition results in an ungrammatical
sentence.
Choice B is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement. Choice C is incorrect
because no punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement. Choice D is incorrect because no
punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement.
ID: 60dd03bc
1.23
Located in the northern United States, the Great Lakes Basin contains roughly 35,000 islands. Lake Superior has Grand
Island, for example. Lake Michigan has Belle Isle. Lake Huron, though, is home ______ the largest island of them all:
Manitoulin Island.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A. to;
B. to—
C. to
D. to,
Rationale
Choice C is the best answer. The convention being tested is punctuation use between a preposition and its complement. No
punctuation is needed between the preposition "to" and its complement "the largest island of them all." The complement
completes the meaning of the preposition in the phrase "home to the largest island of them all," and any punctuation within it
results in an ungrammatical sentence.
Choice A is incorrect because no punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement. Choice B is incorrect
because no punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement. Choice D is incorrect because no
punctuation is needed between the preposition and its complement.
ID: 02871a0d
1.24
In her large-scale sculpture Casa-Isla, artist Edra Soto included references to her childhood in Puerto Rico. For example, the
sculpture’s steel panels have a crisscrossing pattern inspired by the iron gates ______
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Rationale
Choice B is the best answer. The convention being tested is end-of-sentence punctuation. This choice correctly uses a period
to punctuate a declarative sentence ("For example...neighborhood").
Choice A is incorrect. It’s unconventional to use a question mark in this way to punctuate a declarative sentence. Choice C is
incorrect. The structure requires a declarative clause at the end of the sentence that states where Soto saw the steel panels,
not an incomplete interrogative clause that asks a direct question, such as "would Soto see in her neighborhood." Choice D is
incorrect. The structure requires a period and a declarative clause at the end of the sentence that states where Soto saw the
steel panels, not an incomplete interrogative clause asking a direct question, such as "would Soto see in her neighborhood?"
ID: a7fdf862
1.25
Azulejos, mosaics made of glazed ceramic tiles, can be found throughout Portugal. These mosaics beautify places such as
______ stations, and public squares.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A. libraries train
B. libraries: train
C. libraries—train
D. libraries, train
Rationale
Choice D is the best answer. The convention being tested is the punctuation of items in a simple series. The comma after
"libraries" is used conventionally to separate the first and second items ("libraries" and "train stations") in the series.
Choice A is incorrect because it fails to separate the first two items ("libraries" and "train stations") in the series. Choice B is
incorrect because a colon can’t be used in this way to separate items in a simple series. Choice C is incorrect because a
dash can’t be used in this way to separate items in a simple series.
ID: 8b002b08
1.26
Many Samoans enjoy a sport called kilikiti. This bat-and-ball game was derived from ______ kilikiti differs from cricket in a
few key ways.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A. cricket but:
B. cricket but,
C. cricket, but
D. cricket, but,
Rationale
Choice C is the best answer. The convention being tested is the coordination of main clauses within a sentence. This choice
correctly uses a comma before the coordinating conjunction "but" to join the first main clause ("This bat-and-ball game was
derived from cricket") and the second main clause ("kilikiti differs from cricket in a few key ways").
Choice A is incorrect. When coordinating two main clauses such as these, it’s not conventional to use a colon in this way
after the coordinating conjunction. Choice B is incorrect. When coordinating two main clauses such as these, it’s not
conventional to use a comma in this way after the coordinating conjunction. Choice D is incorrect. When coordinating two
main clauses such as these, it’s not conventional to use a comma in this way after the coordinating conjunction.
ID: 155239cf
1.27
By analyzing ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica, a research team at Sweden’s Lund University discovered evidence of a
solar storm that occurred 9,200 years ago. Scientists had previously thought the Sun to be in a relatively “quiet” phase at that
______ the Lund team’s finding suggests otherwise.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
A. time but
B. time, but
C. time,
D. time
Rationale
Choice B is the best answer. The convention being tested is the coordination of main clauses within a sentence. This choice
correctly uses a comma and the coordinating conjunction "but" to join the first main clause ("Scientists...time") and the
second main clause ("the Lund...otherwise").
Choice A is incorrect because when coordinating two longer main clauses such as these, it’s conventional to use a comma
before the coordinating conjunction. Choice C is incorrect because it results in a comma splice. Without a conjunction
following it, a comma can’t be used in this way to join two main clauses. Choice D is incorrect because it results in a run-on
sentence. The two main clauses are fused without punctuation and/or a conjunction.
ID: 4b0c7b62
1.28
The algaita is a double reed wind instrument from West Africa. The reed of a wind instrument is the mouthpiece ______ A
double reed contains two pieces of cane that vibrate and produce sound as air passes between them.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Rationale
Choice C is the best answer. The convention being tested is end-of-sentence punctuation. This choice correctly uses a period
to punctuate a declarative sentence ("the reed of a wind instrument is the mouthpiece") that ends with a prepositional phrase
("where sound is made").
Choice A is incorrect. It’s unconventional to use a question mark to punctuate a declarative sentence. Choice B is incorrect.
The structure requires that the sentence continue as a declarative clause, not end with an interrogative clause. Choice D is
incorrect. The structure requires that the sentence continue as a declarative clause and end with a period, not end with an
interrogative clause and a question mark.