0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views2 pages

Introduction

This document compares the total cost of ownership (TCO) of deploying SAP S/4HANA on Dell VxRail hyperconverged infrastructure versus Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud. It focuses on a specific case of a Sydney-based Dell Technologies customer migrating from SAP ECC to S/4HANA. The analysis includes sizing, reference architecture, and commercial considerations for both deployment options.

Uploaded by

gusoviedo001
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views2 pages

Introduction

This document compares the total cost of ownership (TCO) of deploying SAP S/4HANA on Dell VxRail hyperconverged infrastructure versus Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud. It focuses on a specific case of a Sydney-based Dell Technologies customer migrating from SAP ECC to S/4HANA. The analysis includes sizing, reference architecture, and commercial considerations for both deployment options.

Uploaded by

gusoviedo001
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Introduction

(The Total Cost of Ownership of On-Premises SAP on Dell VxRail HCI Versus Amazon Web Services Public
Cloud)
10-07-2021
目次

Executive summary
References

Executive summary
One of the most critical decisions a customer makes when planning an SAP S/4HANA migration is selecting
the type of deployment option best suits their business needs: on-premises; private cloud; public cloud; or
hybrid cloud. As they evaluate the options, total cost of ownership (TCO) is top of mind.

This document presents the result of a three-year TCO comparison of an SAP HANA database and S/4HANA
application server landscape that is deployed on-premises, running on Dell EMC VxRail hyperconverged
infrastructure, against another deployed on an Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing platform. An
overview of sizing, reference architecture, and commercials is provided for both options.

The TCO analysis focuses on a Sydney, Australia-based Dell Technologies customer with plans to upgrade
and migrate their SAP ERP Central Component (ECC) on Microsoft SQL Server to an SAP S/4HANA
environment.

References
Documentation

The following documentation provides more information:

SAP Quick Sizer tool

SAP documentation

Access to the following SAP notes requires login credentials:

Business Suite on HANA and S/4HANA Sizing Report


Sizing Report for BW on HANA
SAP Activate Methodology for SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP Activate Methodology for SAP S/4HANA Cloud, extended edition

We value your feedback

1
Introduction

Dell Technologies and the authors of this document welcome your feedback on the solution and the solution
documentation. Contact the Dell Technologies Solutions team by email.

The following are acknowledged for significant contributions to this document, along with many others who
have contributed and reviewed its content for accuracy.

Authors: Ambar Hassani; Paul Lewis Greenstock; Beverley Allsop

Support: David Siroky, Steve Earl

Note: For links to more information about this solution, see the Dell Technologies Solutions Info Hub for SAP.

Revisions

Date Description

April 2021 Initial release

May 2021 Reviewed by contributors

September 2021Document release

April 2022 Document revision

Introduction

You might also like