Organizing
Organizing
MEANING
Let us take an example to understand how organising takes place. Have
you ever paid attention to how, the school fete which you enjoy so much,
actually takes place? What goes on behind the scene to make it the
desired reality you want? The whole activity is divided into task groups
each dealing with a specific area like the food committee, the decoration
committee, the ticketing committee and so on. These are under the
overall supervision of the official in charge of the event. Coordinating
relationships are established among the various groups to enable smooth
interaction and clarity about each group’s contribution towards the
event. All the above activities are a part of the organising function.
Organising essentially implies a process which coordinates human
efforts, assembles resources and integrates both into a unified whole to
be utilized for achieving specified objectives. Organising can be defined
as a process that initiates implementation of plans by clarifying jobs and
working relationships and effectively deploying resources for attainment
of identified and desired results (goals).
Importance OF Organizing
Performance of the organising function can pave the way for a smooth
transition of the enterprise in accordance with the dynamic business
environment. The significance of the organising function mainly arises
from the fact that it helps in the survival and growth of an enterprise and
equips it to meet various challenges. In order for any business enterprise
to perform tasks and successfully meet goals, the organising function
must be properly performed. The following points highlight the crucial
role that organising plays in any business enterprise:
(i) Benefits of specialization: Organising leads to a systematic
allocation of jobs amongst the work force. This reduces the
workload as well as enhances productivity because of the specific
workers performing a specific job on a regular basis. Repetitive
performance of a particular task allows a worker to gain
experience in that area and leads to specialization.
(ii) Clarity in working relation ships: The establishment of working
relationships clarifies lines of communication and specifies who is to
report to whom. This removes ambiguity in transfer of information
and instructions. It helps in creating a hierarchical order thereby
enabling the fixation of responsibility and specification of the extent of
authority to be exercised by an individual.
(iii) Optimum utilization of resources: Organising leads to the proper
usage of all material, financial and human resources. The proper
Organising 3
assignment of jobs avoids overlapping of work and also makes
possible the best use of resources. Avoidance of duplication of
work helps in preventing confusion and minimizing the wastage of
resources and efforts.
(iv) Adaptation to change: The process of organising allows a business
enterprise to accommodate changes in the business environment. It
allows the organization structure to be suitably modified and the revision
of interrelationships amongst managerial levels to pave the way for
a smooth transition. It also provides much needed stability to the
enterprise as it can then continue to survive and grow in spite of
changes.
(v) Effective administration: Organising provides a clear
description of jobs and related duties. This helps to avoid confusion and
duplication. Clarity in working relationships enables proper execution of
work. Management of an enterprise thereby becomes easy and this
brings effectiveness in administration.
(vi) Development of personnel: Organising stimulates creativity amongst
the managers. Effective delegation allows the managers to reduce their
workload by assigning routine jobs to their subordinates. The reduction
in workload by delegation is not just necessary because of limited
capacity of an individual but also allows the manager to develop new
methods and ways of performing tasks. It gives them the time to
explore areas for growth and the opportunity to innovate thereby
strengthening the company’s competitive position. Delegation also
develops in the subordinate the ability to deal effectively with
challenges and helps them to realize their full potential.
(vii)Expansion and growth: Organ icing helps in the growth and
diversification of an enterprise by enabling it to deviate from existing
norms and taking up new challenges.
It allows a business enterprise to add more job positions, departments and
even diversify their product lines. New geographical territories can be
added to current areas of operation and this will help to increase customer
base, sales and profit.
Thus, organising is a process by which the manager brings order out of
chaos, removes conflict among people over work or responsibility sharing and
creates an environment suitable for teamwork.
Organization Structure
Organization structure is the outcome of the organising process. An effective
structure will result in increased profitability of the enterprise. The need for
an adequate organization structure is felt by an enterprise whenever it
4 Business Studies
grows in size or complexity. It is only those enterprises which do not focus
on growth that can maintain a particular structure for a long period of time.
However, it is important to understand that such stagnancy may p r o v e t o
b e d e t r i m e n t a l t o an enterprise as those companies which do not change
at all will close down or cease to grow.
As an organization grows, cord nation becomes difficult due to the
emergence of new functions and increase in structural hierarchies. Thus,
for an organization to function smoothly and face environmental
changes, it becomes necessary to pay attention to its structure.
Peter Drucker emphasizes on the importance of having an appropriate
organization structure when he says, “organization structure is an
indispensable means; and the wrong structure will seriously impair busy
ness performance and even destroy it.” The organization structure can
be defined as the framework within which managerial and operating
tasks are performed. It specifies the relationships between people, work
and resources. It allows correlation and coordination among human,
physical and financial resources and this enables a business enterprise
to accomplish desired goals. The organization structure of a firm is
shown in an organization chart.
The span of management, to a large extent gives shape to
the
Organizational structure. Span of management refers to the number of
subordinates that can be effectively managed by a superior. This
determines the levels of management in the structure.
A proper organization structure is essential to ensure a smooth flow of
communication and better control over the operations of a business
enterprise.
An organization structure provides the framework which enables the
enterprise to function as an integrated unit by regulating and coordinating
the responsibilities of individuals and departments. Let us try and
understand this through an example.
For example: Suita opened her own travel agency. The success of her
travel agency depends on a harmonious relationship between the
customer and the employees of the travel agency. In order to achieve this
objective she has divided the entire work of the agency into three
subheads based on the functions namely Operations, sales and
administration. Operations include travel counsellor, reservation and
ticketing and customer care. Sales include the Accounts executive.
Administration includes Book Keeper, Cashier and utility personnel. This
division of work on the basis of functions has resulted into an
organizational structure specifying the line of authority and responsibility.
Organising 5
Functional structure
Grouping of jobs of similar nature under functional and organising these
major functions as separate
Managing Director
Research
Human Resources Marketing and Purchasing
Development
Divisional Structure
Many large organizations with diversified activities have reorganized
themselves away from the simpler and basic functional structure towards
a divisional structure which is more suited to their activities. This is
particularly true of those enterprises which have more than one category
of products to offer. This is because although every organization performs
a set of homogenous functions, as it diversifies into varied product
categories, the need for a more evolved structural design is felt to cope
with the emerging complexity.
Organising 7
In a d i v i s i o n a l s t r u c t u r e , t h e
Organization structure comprises of separate business units or divisions.
Each unit has a divisional manager responsible for performance and who has
authority over the unit. Generally, manpower is grouped on the basis of
different products manufactured. Each division is multifunctional because
within each division functions like production, marketing, finance, purchase,
etc., are performed together to achieve a common goal. Each division is
self-contained as it develops expertise in all functions related to a product line.
In other words, within each division, the functional structure tends to be
adopted. However, functions may vary across divisions in accordance with a
particular product line. Further, each division works as a profit center where
the divisional head is responsible for the profit or loss of his division. For
example, a large company may have divisions like cosmetics, clothing, etc.
Advantages: The divisional structure offers many benefits. Prominent
among these are as follows:
(a) Product specialization helps in the development of varied skills in a
divisional head and this prepares
Research
Human Resources Marketing and Purchasing
Developmen
8 Business Studies
May gain power and in a bid to assert his independence may ignore
organizational interests.
Suitability: Divisional structure is suitable for those business
enterprises where a large variety of products are manufactured using
different productive resources. When an organization grows and needs to
add more employees, create more departments and introduce new levels
of management, it will decide to adopt a divisional structure. Table 1
provides a comparison of functional and divisional structure to provide
further clarity on the topic.
Thus, it can be said that business operates in a dynamic environment and
those enterprises which fail to adapt to change are unable to survive.
Hence, management must continuously review its plans and objectives and
accordingly the organization structure of the enterprise should also be subjected
to periodic review to determine if modification is required. An organization
structure, at all times should contribute towards the achievement of the
enterprise’s objectives and should provide scope for initiative so that
contribution of personnel can be maximum and effective.
Organization Chart of ONGC
120
GVK
Basin IRSwar
ONGC
Medical
Security
Legal
(Frontier)
Corporate
Karakul
Head, Regional
Offshore
Rajahmundry
&
Mehran
Comer-
Assam
Tripura
Ankles
Uren Plant
Academy
(Cauvery)
PSC Comma
Officer
- JV
Satellite
(KG)
coal
C & MD
Company Secretary
Corporate Affairs MD, ONGC Vides Ltd.
Chief Vigilance Officer
Director Director
Director Director Director Director
Tech & ... To be filled...
Offshore Onshore Exploration HR Finance
Field
Services
Business Studies
Regional Geo- Nance Engineering
CBMMBP
physical Services
Design
Exploration
Directorate
EX COM Works
11
Delegation
A manager, no matter how capable he is, cannot manage to do every task
on his own. The volume of work makes it impractical for him to handle it
all by himself. As a consequence, if he desires to meet the organizational
goals, focus on objectives and ensure that all work is accomplished, he
must delegate authority.
Delegation refers to the downward transfer of authority from a superior to
a subordinate. It is a prerequisite to the efficient functioning of an
organization because it enables a manager to use his time on high
priority activities. It also satisfies the subordinate’s need for recognition and
provides them with opportunities to develop and exercise initiative.
Delegation helps a manager to extend his area of operations as without it,
his activities would be restricted to only what he himself can do. However,
delegation does not mean abdication. The manager shall still be
accountable for the performance of the assigned tasks. Moreover, the
authority granted to a subordinate can be taken back and relegated to
another person. Thus, irrespective of the extent of delegated authority, the
manager shall still be accountable to the same extent as before delegation.
Elements of Delegation
According to Louis Allen, delegation is the entrustment of responsibility and
authority to another and the creation of accountability for performance.
A detailed analysis of Louis Allen’s definition brings to light the following
essential elements of delegation:
(i) Authority: Authority refers to the right of an individual to command
his subordinates and to take action within the scope of his position.
The concept of authority arises from the established scalar
16 Business Studies
chain which links the various job positions and levels of an
organization. Authority also refers to the right to take decisions
inherent in a managerial position to tell people what to do and
expect them to do it.
In the formal organization authority originates by virtue of an
individual’s position and the extent of authority is highest at the top
management levels and reduces successively as we go down the
corporate ladder. Thus, authority flows from top to bottom, i.e., the
superior has authority over the subordinate.
Authority relationships helps to maintain order in the organization by
giving the managers the right to exact obedience and give directions to
the workforce under them.
Authority determines the superior subordinate relationship wherein the
superior communicates his decision to the subordinate, expecting
compliance from him and the subordinate executes the decision as per
the guidelines of the superior. The extent to which a superior can exact
compliance also depends on the personality of the superior. It must be
noted that authority is restricted by laws and the rules and regulation of
the organization, which limit its scope. However, as we go higher up in the
management hierarchy, the scope of authority increases.
(ii) Responsibility: Responsibility is the obligation of a subordinate to
properly perform the assigned duty. It arises from a superior–
subordinate relationship because the subordinate is bound to perform the
duty assigned to him by his superior. Thus, responsibility flows upwards,
i.e., a subordinate will always be responsible to his superior.
Decentralization
In many organizations the top management plays an active role in taking all
decisions while there are others in which this power is given to even the lower
levels of management. Those organizations in which decision making
authority lies with the top management are termed as centralized
organizations whereas those in which such authority is shared with lower
levels are decentralized organizations.
Decentralization explains the manner in which decision making
responsibilities are divided among hierarchical levels. Put simply,
decentralization refers to delegation of authority throughout all the levels of
the organization. Decision making authority is shared with lower levels and is
consequently placed nearest to the points of action. In other words decision
making authority is pushed down the chain of command.
When decisions taken by the lower levels are numerous as well as
important an organization can be regarded as greatly decentralized.
Centralization and Decentralization
Centralization and decentralization are relative terms, as seen from the
existing status of various business enterprises.
An organization is centralized when decision-making authority is
retained by higher management levels whereas it is decentralized when
such authority is delegated.
Complete centralization would imply concentration of all decision
making functions at the apex of the management hierarchy. Such a
scenario would obviate the need for a management hierarchy. On the
other hand, c o m p l e t e d e c e n t r a l i z a t i o n would
imply the delegation of all decision making functions to the lower level of
the hierarchy and this would obviate the need for higher managerial
positions. Both the scenarios are unrealistic.
An organization can never be completely centralized or decent raised.
As it grows in size and comp laxity, there is a tendency to move towards
decentralized decision making. This is because in large organizations
those employees who are directly and closely involved with certain
operations tend to have more knowledge about them than the top
management which may only be indirectly associated with individual
operations.
20 Business Studies
Hence, there is a need for a balance between these coexisting forces.
Thus, it can be said that every organization will be characterized by both
centralization and decentralization.
Importance
Decentralization is much more than a mere transfer of authority to the
lower levels of management hierarchy. It is a philosophy that implies
selective dispersal of authority because it propagates the belief that
people are competent, capable and resourceful. They can assume the
responsibility for the effective implementation of their decisions. Thus this
philosophy recognizes the decision maker’s need for a u t o n o m y . The
m a n a g e m e n t , however, needs to carefully select those decisions which
will be pushed down to lower levels and those that will be retained for higher
levels. Table 4 provides a comparative look between delegation and
decentralization.
Decentralization is a fundamental step and its importance can be
understood from the following points:
(i) Develops initiative among subordinates: Decentralization helps to
promote self-reliance and confidence amongst the subordinates. This is
because when lower managerial levels are given freedom to take their
own decisions they learn to depend on their own judgment. It also keeps
them in a state wherein they are constantly challenged and have to
develop solutions for the various problems they encounter. A
decentralization policy helps to identify those executives who have the
necessary potential to become dynamic leaders.
(ii) Develops m a n a g e r i a l t a l e n t
for the future: Formal training plays an important part in equipping
subordinates with skills that help them rise in the organization but
equally important is the experience gained by handling assignments
independently. Decentralization gives them a chance to prove their
abilities and creates a reservoir of qualified manpower who can be
considered to fill up more challenging positions through promotions. It
also helps to identify those who may not be successful in assuming
greater responsibility. Thus, it is a means of management education as
well as an opportunity for trained manpower to use its talent in real life
situations.
(iii) Quick decision making: The management hierarchy can be looked
upon as a chain of communication. In centralized organization because
every decision is taken by the top management the flow of
information is slow as it has to traverse many levels. Response also takes
Organising 21
time. This reduces the speed of decision making and makes it difficult for
an enterprise to adapt to dynamic operating conditions. In a decentralized
organization, however, since decisions are taken at levels which are
nearest to the points of action and there is no requirement for approval
from many levels, the process is much faster. There are also less chances
of information getting distorted because it doesn’t have to go through
long channels.
(iv) Relief t o t o p m a n a g e m e n t :
Decentralization diminishes the amount o f d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n
exercised by a superior over the activities of a subordinate because they
are given the freedom to act and decide albeit within the limits set by the
superior. Also, personal supervision is generally replaced by other forms
of control such as return on investment etc. Decentralization also leaves
the top management with more time which they can devote to important
policy decisions rather than occupying their time with both policy as well
as operational decisions. In fact decentralization is greatest when checking
required on decisions taken by lower levels of management is least.
(v) Facilitates growth: Decentral station awards greater autonomy to
the lower levels of management as well as divisional or departmental
heads. This allows them to function in a manner best suited to their
department and fosters a sense of competition amongst the
departments. Consequently, with each department doing its best in a
bid to outdo the other, the productivity levels increase and the
organization is able to generate more returns which can be used for
expansion purposes.
(vi) Better control: Decentralization makes it possible to evaluate
performance at each level and the departments can be individually
Held accountable for their results. The extent of achievement of
organizational objectives as well as the contribution of each
department in meeting the overall objectives can be ascertained.
Feedback from all levels helps to analyses variances and improve
operations. In decentralization, one of the challenges is the
accountability of performance. In response to this challenge, better
control systems are being evolved such as the balance score card and
management information system. Decentralization compels the
management to innovative performance measurement systems.
As a conclusion, it must be noted that in spite of its benefits
decentralization should be applied with caution as it can lead to
organizational disintegration if the departments start to operate on their
own guidelines which may be contrary to the interest of the organization.
22 Business Studies
Decentralization must always be balanced with centralization in areas of
major policy decisions.